Crypto World
White House Adviser Says Banks Shouldn’t Fear
The regulatory dispute shaping crypto markets intensified as lawmakers push the CLARITY Act, a proposal aimed at reconciling jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) while introducing a formal taxonomy for digital assets. In this environment, White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt argued that allowing stablecoin reward programs offered by crypto platforms should not threaten traditional banks, urging room for compromise between the industry and incumbents. He described the current clash over stablecoin yields as “unfortunate,” insisting that platforms can offer yield products without disrupting existing bank models. A key line of debate centers on whether such yields amount to an unfair advantage or a natural extension of crypto services that banks are already pursuing through OCC charters.
Witt spoke publicly amid ongoing negotiations about the CLARITY Act, a comprehensive bill that would delineate regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC and codify a framework for classifying crypto assets. He told Yahoo Finance that the industry and banks should be able to operate with shared, competitive product offerings, and that cooperation could unlock new services for customers while preserving financial stability. The interview underscored a broader stance within the administration: innovation should not be stifled, but it must be channeled through clear, enforceable rules.
“They can also offer stablecoin products to their customers, just the same as crypto. This is not an unfair advantage in either way, and many banks are now applying for OCC bank charters themselves to start offering bank-like products to their customers.”
As the debate continues, industry observers note that stablecoin yield programs—long a source of friction between crypto platforms and traditional banks—have become a focal point in how the market structures, and how lawmakers will eventually codify governance for digital assets. The tension has contributed to delays in passing the CLARITY market structure bill, even as proponents emphasize that regulatory clarity would reduce risk and foster legitimate growth. The discussion is not limited to the United States; its outcomes could influence international actors seeking a predictable framework for crypto activities and yield-bearing products.
The CLARITY Act is not just about power delineations; it is also about process. The proposal would establish a formal taxonomy for digital assets and set clear boundaries on which agency leads on what types of instruments. In doing so, it aims to reduce the ambiguity that many market participants say has slowed product development and investment decisions. Yet with the 2026 U.S. midterm elections looming, policymakers and industry executives warn that a shift in control or a politicized environment could derail momentum and threaten the timeline for implementing new rules.
Supporters of the bill have argued that the current regulatory haze is a drag on innovation and market integrity alike. Opponents worry about overreach and the potential for regulatory fragmentation to create compliance burdens. The administration’s line, echoed by Witt, is that a pragmatic path exists: a framework that protects consumers and ensures fair competition while allowing crypto firms to compete on a level playing field with traditional financial institutions.
The debate has drawn attention from high-level voices inside and outside government. Some officials warn that if the House shifts control or if the midterms redraw the political map, the chance to finalize the act could slip away, raising the specter of a regulatory rollback under future administrations. In the meantime, proponents are pushing to keep the window open, arguing that a timely compromise would deliver much-needed clarity and enable continued innovation in a sector that has already reshaped payments, asset custody, and yield strategies for many users.
As markets watch for signs of movement, Witt cautions that a sense of urgency remains essential. The White House Crypto Council has signaled a preference to have the CLARITY Act signed into law before the midterms absorb all policy energy, a reflection of how election cycles can impact regulatory priorities in Washington. The broader industry context remains one of cautious optimism tempered by the reality that policy change in this arena tends to unfold incrementally, with multiple committees, hearings, and competing priorities shaping the final form of any legislation.
Key takeaways
- The CLARITY Act seeks to resolve regulatory overlaps by defining clear jurisdiction for crypto markets between the SEC and CFTC and by creating an asset taxonomy.
- Stablecoin reward programs offered by crypto platforms have emerged as a central flashpoint in negotiations, affecting how banks perceive competition and the potential for OCC charters to offer similar products.
- White House and industry voices emphasize that allowing yield-bearing crypto products does not inherently threaten bank models and may spur collaboration between fintechs and traditional banks.
- The approach hinges on political timing: the 2026 U.S. midterm elections could derail momentum, prompting urgency from policymakers to secure legislation before the election cycle dominates attention.
- Market participants are watching for concrete signals on regulatory alignment, licence pathways for banks, and any new guidance from the White House Crypto Council ahead of meaningful legislative action.
- Beyond domestic debates, the outcome of CLARITY could influence global regulatory expectations and how exchanges, lenders, and wallets structure risk and compliance moving forward.
Sentiment: Neutral
Market context: The ongoing CLARITY discussions sit within a broader climate of regulatory scrutiny and evolving risk sentiment in crypto markets. Investors and institutions await a coherent framework that reduces ambiguity around asset classification, custody, and product permissions, all while remaining sensitive to political timelines and potential shifts in congressional control. As regulators debate jurisdiction, market participants recalibrate liquidity strategies and risk management practices in anticipation of clarity rather than ambiguity.
Why it matters
The core significance of these negotiations lies in the potential for a formal, nationwide framework that makes it easier for crypto firms to operate with confidence while offering consumers clearer protections. A codified taxonomy and clarified agency responsibilities would reduce the current patchwork of guidance, enabling more predictable product development and risk management for platforms that offer yield-based services tied to stablecoins. For banks, the debate tests their willingness to engage with digital-asset ecosystems in a way that preserves safety and soundness while exploring new revenue streams through regulated, bank-like products.
For users, regulatory clarity could translate into more robust consumer protections, standardized disclosures, and a more consistent set of custodial and settlement practices. For builders—exchanges, wallets, and fintechs—a stable, rule-based environment lowers compliance risk and potentially unlocks new partnerships with traditional financial institutions. Yet until legislation passes, the sector remains exposed to policy fluctuations, with funding cycles, product launches, and strategic investments hinging on regulatory signals rather than market fundamentals alone.
In a sector that has repeatedly demonstrated the rapidity with which innovation can outpace policy, the CLARITY Act represents more than a legal instrument; it is a test of the industry’s ability to coexist with traditional finance under a framework that seeks to prevent systemic risk. The administration’s emphasis on timely action underscores the stakes: jurisdictions, product categories, and the balance of powers in financial regulation are all at stake as negotiators weigh how to translate high-level principles into enforceable rules. The outcome could set a template for how the United States integrates crypto assets into the broader financial system, with potential ripple effects across markets, liquidity flows, and investor confidence.
What to watch next
- Progress in CLARITY Act negotiations in Congress, including committee votes and potential amendments (date-dependent).
- Election results and the political balance of the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms and their impact on crypto policy agendas.
- Official guidance or announcements from the White House Crypto Council regarding timelines for the bill’s signing or regulatory clarifications.
- Any movement on OCC charter applications or other pathways for banks to offer crypto-related, yield-bearing products to customers.
- Public disclosures or hearings that illuminate how the SEC and CFTC would implement the proposed asset taxonomy and jurisdictional boundaries.
Sources & verification
- What the CLARITY Act is actually trying to clarify in crypto markets — Cointelegraph
- White House crypto adviser says there’s no time to wait as CLARITY Act window closes — Yahoo Finance
- Delays in passing the CLARITY market structure bill — Cointelegraph
- White House crypto bill talks ‘productive,’ but no deal yet — Cointelegraph
Market reaction and key details
What the debate means for users and institutions
The conversations around the CLARITY Act reflect a pivotal moment for crypto policy: designers of the framework aim to secure a balance between encouraging innovation and maintaining financial stability. The tension over stablecoin yields reveals a deeper question about alignment between rapidly evolving digital-asset products and traditional financial services. As negotiators seek to codify roles and product allowances, market participants should monitor statements from policymakers and industry leaders, as these will influence funding choices, product roadmaps, and risk management practices in the near term.
Why it matters next
Regulatory clarity could enable more predictable product development and safer consumer experiences within the crypto-finance ecosystem. For lenders and exchanges, a clear taxonomy and jurisdictional split reduces the risk of misclassification and regulatory overlap, potentially easing cross-border participation and institutional involvement. For policymakers, the CLARITY Act offers a framework to reconcile innovation with oversight, aiming to prevent systemic risk while preserving competitive, diverse financial services in the digital asset space.
Key Highlights
- ACHR advanced approximately 5% during Tuesday’s session to reach $5.185, up from the previous day’s close of $4.94, with trading volume hitting ~33.5 million shares.
- The company fell short of Q4 projections for both earnings per share (($0.26) actual vs. ($0.17) forecast) and quarterly revenue ($0.30M actual vs. $1.4M forecast).
- Institutional investors now control more than 50% of shares, including Vanguard Index Funds’ 5.86% position and ARK’s holdings of roughly 35 million shares.
- Wall Street consensus remains at “Moderate Buy” with a mean price objective of $12.00; TipRanks shows an average projection of $13.20.
- Archer concluded 2025 holding approximately $2 billion in liquid assets and received FAA approval for its eVTOL compliance methodology, maintaining its late 2026 passenger service launch schedule.
Archer Aviation ($ACHR) shares have declined approximately 30% since the beginning of 2026, but Tuesday brought a modest recovery as the stock advanced roughly 5% intraday to $5.185, briefly hitting $5.23 during the session. Monday’s closing price stood at $4.94.
Trading activity reached approximately 33.5 million shares, representing about 7% less than the typical daily volume of roughly 35.9 million. The security’s 50-day simple moving average stands at $6.83, while the 200-day average rests at $8.41, indicating that both short-term and long-term technical indicators remain significantly above present trading levels.
The company’s latest quarterly financial results, published on March 2, presented challenges for shareholders. Archer reported a per-share loss of ($0.26), falling short of the analyst consensus forecast of ($0.17) by nine cents. Quarterly revenue totaled just $0.30 million, substantially below the anticipated $1.40 million. However, revenue demonstrated a remarkable 29,900% year-over-year increase from an essentially negligible base.
Despite the earnings shortfall, the company maintains a robust financial position. Archer finished 2025 holding approximately $2 billion in cash reserves, carrying a minimal debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.05, and showing a current ratio of 19.89. This financial runway provides management with flexibility to pursue commercial objectives without immediate capital constraints.
Regarding regulatory progress, the FAA has approved Archer’s eVTOL compliance methodology, preserving the company’s schedule for initial commercial passenger operations. Management continues to target a service debut by late 2026. This upcoming milestone represents a cornerstone of the investment thesis for bullish investors.
Wall Street Perspectives Vary, With Bullish Bias
Analyst opinion remains divided but leans optimistic. Five analysts assign a Buy rating, two recommend Hold, and one maintains a Sell rating. The mean price objective among analysts reaches $12.00, indicating significant appreciation potential from present levels. TipRanks, incorporating more current analyst updates, displays a Strong Buy consensus with a $13.20 mean target — suggesting possible upside of approximately 148% from the $5.185 level.
Needham reduced its price objective from $10.00 to $9.00 in early March while maintaining a Buy recommendation. Goldman Sachs launched coverage with a Neutral stance and an $11.00 target in December. Weiss Ratings continues to hold a Sell rating.
Insider transactions have skewed toward stock sales recently. During the past 90 days, company insiders disposed of approximately 380,750 shares worth roughly $2.6 million. CTO Thomas Muniz sold 9,580 shares on March 13 at $6.27 per share, while insider Tosha Perkins sold 10,949 shares at the identical price on the same date.
Large Investors Accumulate Shares
Notwithstanding the stock’s recent decline, major investors have expanded their holdings. Institutional and hedge fund ownership currently represents approximately 59% of outstanding shares. ARK Investment Management controls approximately 35.2 million shares following an addition of roughly 3.9 million shares during Q4. BNP Paribas expanded its stake by 423% in Q4, elevating its total position to approximately 5.1 million shares.
Vanguard Index Funds maintains a 5.86% ownership stake, positioning them as the top institutional shareholder. CEO Adam Goldstein holds approximately 4.89% of outstanding shares.
Among exchange-traded funds, the SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF ($XAR) maintains a 2.94% position, with the ARK Innovation ETF ($ARKK) holding 2.58%.
The company’s market capitalization stands at $3.86 billion with a beta of 3.10, demonstrating the stock’s tendency toward heightened volatility compared to broader market movements.
Bitcoin faced renewed selling pressure as risk assets sagged in response to headlines around a potential escalation in the Iran situation following a key address by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trading data showed BTC dipping toward the $66,000 area, roughly 2% lower on the day, as equities and gold declined and the U.S. dollar steadied its footing. The move underscored how macro jitters continue to spill over into the crypto space, even as traders weigh the asset’s longer-term narrative beyond daily headlines.
The broader macro backdrop added to Bitcoin’s near-term challenges. The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) rebounded toward the 100 level, reflecting renewed demand for cash amid geopolitical uncertainty and higher oil prices. In tandem, crude markets traded above the $100 per barrel mark, with WTI reaching around $104, buffeting risk appetite further. Analysts characterized the day’s move as a continuation of a risk-off regime that has pressured risk assets across equities, gold and cryptocurrencies in recent sessions.
Key takeaways
-
Bitcoin slid about 2% on the day, with intraday lows near $66,200 as markets reacted to Trump’s address and the Iran situation.
-
The U.S. dollar strengthened, with the DXY approaching 104 in what traders described as a renewed breakout risk for major risk assets.
-
Oil surged back above $104 per barrel, contributing to higher hedging costs and tighter financial conditions that tend to weigh on speculative assets including BTC.
-
Bitcoin’s chart pattern remained under watch as a bear-flag setup persisted, raising the prospect of further downside if support fails.
-
Analysts pressed for clarity on de-escalation prospects, with commentary highlighting the risk of a renewed risk-off cycle if the geopolitical backdrop worsens.
Markets in a wary mood as geopolitics loom
Market participants were left interpreting whether Trump’s national address would signal de-escalation or a continuation of tensions. Observers noted that the lack of a clear de-escalation message left traders updating risk models to account for an extended period of volatility. In a rapid-fire sequence of commentary on social media, analysts noted that the tone of the speech did not provide the reassurance markets had hoped for, leaving open the possibility of a further escalation path.
Beyond geopolitics, the macro mix of a firmer dollar and elevated oil prices reinforced a cautious stance for investors. The dollar’s climb tended to weigh on non-yielding assets such as gold and growth-oriented assets, including equities and BTC, which often trade inversely to the USD in times of stress. Oil’s move above the $100 threshold added to the sense that financial conditions could tighten, complicating the recovery narrative for risk assets.
Analysts highlighted how these dynamics feed into Bitcoin’s complex narrative. While BTC had shown resilience during earlier risk-off periods, the current pricing environment has kept a lid on fresh strength, with traders watching for signs that the macro environment might pivot back toward risk-on as geopolitical concerns ease. As one trader noted, scenario planning now hinges on whether a de-escalation or further escalation unfolds in the near term.
Bitcoin’s bear-flag in focus as technicals meet macro headwinds
On the technical side, Bitcoin’s price action continued to echo a bear-flag formation that began to form earlier in the year. Market participants have warned that the pattern carries the risk of a breakdown if the price cannot hold above key support levels. In a recent assessment, Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, observed that BTC/USD still lacks clear directional momentum and that the current structure bears a strong resemblance to the prior bear-flag setup. “Structurally, BTC price action is still nearly identical to the prior bear flag structure,” he wrote, noting that the pattern may persist unless price deviates from the established path.
Analysts also weighed in on how external catalysts might interact with BTC’s technical canvas. The persistence of a risk-off regime—driven by macro data, currency moves and energy prices—could push the bear-flag toward a breakdown, potentially setting new psychological and technical levels for traders to monitor. Conversely, a renewed risk appetite amid easing geopolitical tensions or favorable macro signals could provide relief rallies that test the upper boundaries of the flag pattern.
Specifically, Bitcoin’s momentum has been a topic of ongoing debate among traders. Some observers contend that the asset’s recent behavior is consistent with a broader macro-driven compression, where liquidity constraints and cross-asset correlations keep BTC tethered to a lower range until catalysts shift. Others emphasize the importance of a sustained close above critical trendlines to reassert upside potential. This tug-of-war between macro headwinds and technical resistance will shape Bitcoin’s near-term trajectory as markets await clearer directional cues.
“The market, which was finally beginning to show some signs of calming, is now highly agitated, with US oil prices back to $104 per barrel, stocks down sharply, and the bond market melting down again,” one trader observed, highlighting how the macro backdrop feeds into crypto’s volatility.
“The address did not present a clear de-escalation,” another analyst commented, underscoring why risk assets remain under pressure and BTC remains in a cautious posture.
What to watch next for traders
Looking ahead, market watchers will be focused on several key inflection points. The trajectory of the dollar will be central: a decisive breakout toward the high-100s, or a rollback, could significantly shift risk sentiment for crypto and equities alike. Oil’s price action will also matter, as sustained energy-market pressures can prolong macro tightening and complicate recovery bets for risk assets.
From a crypto-specific lens, BTC’s ability to hold the current support envelope and to navigate the bear-flag without accelerating toward new lows will determine whether the market can stage a relief rally or slip into deeper correction territory. Traders will be watching for a potential breakout in either direction, as well as any news flow on sanctions, geopolitical developments, or policy shifts that could recalibrate risk appetite in the near term.
In the near term, investors and traders should prepare for continued volatility. The confluence of a fragile macro backdrop, a stronger dollar, elevated oil prices, and a persistent bear-flag pattern means Bitcoin could remain range-bound for a while, with outsized moves possible on unexpected headlines or new macro data leaving a clearer path for traders to follow.
For readers seeking color on the latest macro and crypto context, ongoing commentary from market analysts and relevant data points remain critical. As this narrative evolves, the next moves in BTC, the dollar, and risk assets will likely be tightly interwoven with geopolitical headlines and central-bank communications.
As the scene unfolds, the question remains: will a de-escalation signal eventually arrive to rekindle risk appetite, or will geopolitical tensions keep crypto markets tethered to a cautious, downside-biased regime? The coming days should reveal which trajectory dominates and where Bitcoin stands within that broader spectrum.
Crypto exchange Bithumb is reportedly delaying plans for its IPO until after 2028, according to local media.
Summary
- Bithumb has pushed its IPO timeline to after 2028 as it works to strengthen accounting standards and internal controls following regulatory setbacks.
- The exchange remains under scrutiny after a $40 billion internal balance error and a 36.8 billion won fine tied to anti-money laundering violations.
Per a report from Maeil Business News Korea citing a Bithumb official, the South Korean crypto exchange is set to “focus on preparing for the listing until 2027.”
Bithumb’s CFO Jeong Sang-gyun said at the company’s annual shareholder meeting that the company was strengthening its accounting policies and internal controls following an IPO advisory agreement with Samjong KPMG.
Bithumb recently reappointed CEO Lee Jae-won for a two-year term at the Tuesday meeting, where the IPO delay was also addressed. Initially, the listing was expected around 2025.
The delay also comes as Bithumb remains under sustained regulatory and operational scrutiny, with a series of incidents raising questions around internal controls and compliance standards.
In February, the exchange mistakenly credited users with 2,000 Bitcoin instead of 2,000 Korean won during a promotional event that created internal balances exceeding $40 billion.
While most of the funds existed only on the platform’s internal ledger and were later reversed, the incident drew regulatory attention over how such large discrepancies could be processed within minutes.
Separately, South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service has been examining the incident to assess potential weaknesses in Bithumb’s electronic ledger systems and oversight mechanisms.
Earlier this month, the exchange was also fined 36.8 billion won, about $24.5 million, for violations of anti-money laundering rules.
The exchange allegedly processed 45,772 crypto transfers involving 18 unregistered overseas virtual asset service providers, in breach of regulatory requirements.
Despite the delays, a major exchange going public could carry broader implications for crypto adoption and capital markets in the country.
Meanwhile, Dunamu, which operates Upbit, has also announced plans for an IPO following the completion of a share swap with Naver Financial, expected later this year.
Ethereum price is holding critical support despite macro headwinds and bearish prediction battering the broader crypto market. ETH is barely holding the $2,000 support, down more than 4% across the past 24 hours, yet on-chain metrics continue signaling underlying demand that price alone doesn’t capture.
Network activity shows that transaction volumes have remained elevated through the recent volatility, and developer deployment activity on Ethereum-adjacent infrastructure has not slowed. Aggregated forecast models currently place ETH in a contested range, with short-term targets diverging sharply between bulls and bears.
That divergence itself is a signal. As we know, markets rarely split this cleanly without a decisive catalyst incoming. Broader geopolitical uncertainty is amplifying volatility across all major pairs, keeping institutional positioning cautious.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
Ethereum Price Prediction: $2,500 This Month?
Ethereum is currently consolidating just above the $2,000 range, a zone that has acted as both support and resistance across multiple sessions. Short-term forecast models flag $2,000 as the psychological floor, and a clean break below would likely trigger accelerated selling toward the $1,800-$1,900 band, a level last tested during the 2024 Q4 pullback.
Volume has thinned relative to the February peak as a sign of indecisionn. The 50-day moving average is curling downward, pressing on price from above near $2,280. RSI on the daily sits in the mid-40s, not oversold, but far from a bounce signal.
If support holds, ETH’s positioning relative to the altcoin cycle still looks constructive longer-term. Short-term, patience is the trade. $2,500 can break and wave goodbye to bears.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside as Ethereum Tests Key Levels
Ethereum’s compressed range is a reminder of the ceiling problem: even a strong recovery to $2,500 represents roughly 20% upside from current levels, a modest against the risk profile. That math is exactly why capital rotates toward earlier-stage infrastructure plays when large-caps stall.
LiquidChain is emerging as a notable infrastructure presale in this environment. The project positions itself as a Layer 3 execution environment that unifies liquidity from Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. Developers deploy once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously, eliminating the fragmentation that currently costs DeFi protocols measurable TVL.
A new layer emerges. Only a few see it first.
The future is LiquidChain⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSj94 pic.twitter.com/R7ZeZ0NPGl
— LiquidChain (@getliquidchain) March 24, 2026
The presale has raised $638K at a current token price of $0.01445, with a Unified Liquidity Layer and Verifiable Settlement architecture as its technical core. It also offers 1700% APY staking rewards as bonus for early buyers.
For traders watching ETH consolidate with limited short-term upside, exploring LiquidChain’s presale terms may be worth adding to the research queue.
This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.
The post Ethereum Price Prediction: Network Activity Still Growing in This Volatile Market appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Free AI Quant trading bots designed to help users efficiently earn cryptocurrency profits
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
AI quant trading bots are gaining traction in 2026 as traders automate strategies to navigate complex crypto markets.
Summary
- AI quant trading bots are essential in 2026, helping traders automate strategies and navigate complex crypto markets.
- BitsStrategy ranks top with adaptive AI, real-time data analysis, and automated risk management features.
- Its free plan, multi-exchange support, and ease of use make it ideal for both beginners and experienced traders.
In 2026, the crypto market is growing increasingly complex, making it harder for traders to manually analyze and execute trades. Fortunately, AI-powered quantitative trading bots have become essential tools for anyone looking to automate their trading strategies, analyze data at scale, and boost profits efficiently — all without requiring constant monitoring or expert knowledge.
This guide breaks down the top 6 free AI quant trading bots that can help traders enhance their cryptocurrency earnings in 2026. These bots are designed to run intelligent, data‑driven strategies that maximize profitability while simplifying the trading process.
BitsStrategy– Best overall free AI quant trading system
Overview:
BitsStrategy leads the pack as the top AI quant trading bot for 2026, offering robust performance and cutting-edge machine learning algorithms. This free platform automatically adapts its trading strategies based on real‑time market data, allowing both beginners and seasoned traders to benefit from its automated system.
Key Features:
- Advanced AI Algorithms that optimize strategies in real‑time
- Customizable Quant Strategies with an easy-to-use interface
- Multi‑exchange support for greater liquidity
- Zero Fees on the free plan
- Automated risk management and performance monitoring
Why It’s Worth Using:
BitsStrategy offers an ideal blend of simplicity and advanced AI capabilities, making it perfect for both new and experienced traders who want to automate their strategies without any upfront cost.
Click and register to receive a free $10 real reward!
Pionex – Best free AI quant trading bot platform
Overview:
Pionex is known for offering 16 free built‑in bots, including grid, infinity grid, and rebalancing bots. It allows users to deploy automated strategies directly within the platform without needing to link external APIs, reducing delays and connectivity issues.
Key Features:
- 16 Free Trading Bots including Grid, Infinity Grid, and Rebalancing
- Built‑in liquidity from top exchanges
- Simple mobile interface for easy setup
- Supports trending and sideways markets
- Free to use with no subscription fees
Why It’s Worth Using:
Pionex is perfect for beginners seeking free automated bots and a simple, no‑cost platform for getting started with crypto trading.
3Commas – Best free bot tools for portfolio efficiency
Overview:
3Commas offers a range of AI‑driven tools for automated portfolio management, including smart trade features and customizable quant bots. With its free tier, traders can access essential automation tools for managing multiple assets and optimizing trade strategies across exchanges.
Key Features:
- DCA, Grid, and Algorithmic Bots
- Smart Trade terminal with take‑profit & stop‑loss functions
- Unified portfolio management across exchanges
- Real‑time notifications and alerts
- Free basic tools for automated trading
Why It’s Worth Using:
3Commas is ideal for those who want to manage diverse portfolios and automate trading strategies across multiple exchanges without paying a subscription fee.
Cryptohopper – Best free strategy marketplace bot
Overview:
Cryptohopper’s free plan provides access to its strategy marketplace, where users can choose from a variety of pre‑configured quant strategies designed by expert traders. These bots execute strategies based on AI signals, automating trading without the need for manual intervention.
Key Features:
- Strategy Marketplace with ready‑made templates
- AI‑driven signals and automated execution
- Multi‑exchange API integration
- Mobile‑optimized dashboard
- Push notifications and alerts
Why It’s Worth Using:
Cryptohopper is perfect for those who want to deploy ready‑made quant strategies without creating them from scratch, while still benefiting from AI automation.
TradeSanta – Best free cloud quant trading bots
Overview:
TradeSanta operates cloud‑based bots, meaning they can trade 24/7 without needing a dedicated computer or server. It’s perfect for traders who prefer a cloud‑based solution with no setup required and want reliable automated trading at all times.
Key Features:
- Cloud‑based, fully automated bots that run continuously
- Grid and DCA strategies for automated market participation
- Real‑time trade notifications and performance tracking
- Easy mobile and web app for monitoring and configuration
- Free plan available for basic bot features
Why It’s Worth Using:
TradeSanta’s cloud automation makes it a great option for users who want to run bots without relying on a personal computer, especially for beginners.
Coinrule – Best free no‑code AI quant strategy builder
Overview:
Coinrule allows users to create and run rule‑based quant strategies without needing any coding knowledge. With a free tier, users can access basic strategy templates and set up automated trading with simple triggers based on market conditions.
Key Features:
- No‑Code Strategy Builder for easy rule creation
- 250+ preset templates for quick strategy automation
- Conditional triggers like price movements and technical indicators
- Free access to basic rule builder and templates
- API integration with leading exchanges
Why It’s Worth Using:
Coinrule is ideal for users who want to create custom quant strategies with no technical knowledge, using simple drag‑and‑drop tools.
How AI quant trading bots help traders earn more
AI‑powered quant bots have transformed the way traders earn profits in crypto markets. Here’s why they work:
- 24/7 Automation: AI bots trade around the clock, capturing opportunities even while you sleep.
- No Emotional Bias: Bots execute strategies logically without human emotional influence.
- Data‑Driven Analysis: AI analyzes vast amounts of data to make precise predictions and decisions.
- Backtesting: Many bots offer the ability to test strategies before applying them in real‑time.
- Risk Management: Automated stop‑loss and take‑profit features ensure safer trading.
Conclusion
The rise of free AI quant trading bots has revolutionized crypto trading in 2026. Whether someone is looking for free built‑in bots like those offered by Pionex, AI‑optimized quant systems with BitsStrategy, or customizable strategies with Coinrule, there’s a bot for everyone:
| Bot | Best For |
| BitsStrategy | Best overall AI quant trading system |
| Pionex | Free built‑in bots |
| 3Commas | Portfolio & multi‑exchange management |
| Cryptohopper | Strategy marketplace |
| TradeSanta | Cloud‑based automation |
| Coinrule | No‑code quant strategy builder |
With the help of these tools, anyone can automate strategies, analyze market trends, and maximize profits, all while simplifying the trading process.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
AI-powered Genius Group has sold off its remaining Bitcoin holdings in the first quarter to pay down debt.
Summary
- Genius Group sold its remaining Bitcoin in Q1 to repay debt, stepping back from its earlier commitment to hold the majority of reserves in BTC.
- The company reported a turnaround in performance, with revenue reaching $3.3 million and net profit at $2.7 million after a loss a year earlier.
According to an April 1 press release, the company said it will “recommence building its Bitcoin Treasury when it believes market conditions are more favorable,” outlining that the exit is tied to timing rather than a full departure from its digital asset strategy.
The firm first committed to a “Bitcoin first” approach back in November 2024, stating that 90% or more of its reserves would be held in BTC. The latest move marks a break from that position as liquidity needs took priority.
Genius Group reported holding 84 BTC, valued at about $5.7 million, as of March 2026. Its Bitcoin balance had been declining since April 2025, when a US court temporarily blocked treasury expansion. The company resumed purchases in June, but the latest sale has now reduced its holdings to zero, according to data from Bitcoin Treasuries.
Revenue for the quarter rose 171% year-on-year to $3.3 million, while gross profit increased 228% to $2 million. A $500,000 operating loss recorded in Q1 2025 turned into a $2.7 million net profit in Q1 2026.
Similar decisions have surfaced across the sector as companies adjust balance sheets.
MARA Holdings sold 15,133 BTC in March for roughly $1.1 billion, reducing its treasury to 38,689 BTC and pushing it down to the third-largest corporate holder. The bulk of the proceeds went toward repurchasing about $1 billion in convertible senior notes, with the remainder allocated to general corporate use.
Similarly, mining company Bitdeer liquidated its entire 943 BTC balance in February and also sold newly mined coins, reducing its corporate holdings to zero. Among other firms, Cango Inc. sold 4,451 BTC to cut exposure, while GD Culture Group approved the sale of part of its 7,500 BTC reserve.
The CLARITY Act’s Senate Banking Committee markup could find a direction in April, and three Made in USA coins are approaching technical inflection points that could determine their direction for the month.
BeInCrypto analysts have identified setups across three popular US-origin coins where regulatory clarity, on-chain fundamentals, and chart structures are converging at the same time. Each token offers a different risk profile heading into April.
Stellar (XLM)
Stellar enters April with the strongest alignment between fundamental catalysts and technical structure among the three Made in USA coins on this list. The CLARITY Act’s April markup directly benefits Stellar as an ISO 20022-compliant payments rail. Franklin Templeton’s BENJI tokenized fund continues to operate on Stellar, and the network now holds over $1.4 billion in real-world asset value according to rwa.xyz data.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
The daily chart shows an inverse head-and-shoulders pattern forming since late January. The neckline sits near $0.190, and a breakout would target a 21.24% measured move to $0.234.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum indicator that tracks the speed of price changes, supports the case. Between January 25 and March 29, price printed a lower low while RSI printed a higher low. That bullish divergence is still active. Previously, when a similar divergence confirmed, around March 22, Stellar surged approximately 21%.
If the April 3 XLM price candle forms above $0.163, another divergence layer confirms. The first hurdle sits at $0.176, the 0.618 level. A fall below $0.154 would invalidate the entire inverse head-and-shoulders structure. $0.163 separates an active divergence-driven rally toward $0.190 from a structural failure below $0.154.
Cardano (ADA)
Cardano is the bearish counterweight on this list despite carrying the strongest single April catalyst among Made in USA coins as Volatility Shares just debuted live 2x leveraged ETFs and standard futures exposure for Cardano.
The Midnight privacy sidechain launched in Q1 2026 with Google Cloud, MoneyGram, and Vodafone as validators. Yet the chart is not responding to these triggers.
The daily chart shows a bearish triangle pattern with the lower trendline sitting at $0.2327. ADA is down 13% over the past 30 days and 4.07% in the latest session, pressing closer to that support with each candle.
A hidden bearish divergence is adding pressure. Between February 6 and April 1, price made a lower high while RSI made a higher high. This pattern typically signals that the existing downtrend retains control even when short-term momentum improves temporarily.
A break below $0.232 exposes $0.219, the base of the measured structure. The first recovery level sits at $0.271. Only a sustained push above $0.354, the 0.618 level, would shift the bias to bullish.
Until then, the pending ETF filings and Midnight launch remain catalysts without chart confirmation. Per the chart, $0.232 separates a contained triangle consolidation from a fresh breakdown to new year-to-date lows at $0.219.
Algorand (ALGO)
Algorand is the most conflicted of the three tokens heading into April. Allbridge Core, a cross-chain bridge protocol that allows users to move stablecoins between different blockchain networks without wrapping them, enabled native USDC transfers to Algorand from Solana, Ethereum, Base, Sui, and Stellar earlier this year.
The integration gives Algorand a direct stablecoin on-ramp from five major ecosystems for the first time, addressing one of its longest-standing liquidity gaps.
However, Algorand’s DeFi total value locked has dropped from $133.27 million in July 2025 to $53.76 million according to DefiLlama data. That 60% decline in on-chain activity stands in contrast with the 15% monthly price gain, creating a disconnect between price and fundamental usage.
The daily chart shows a possible bull flag and pole pattern with a pole height of approximately 39%. A pullback is now building. Between January 5 and April 1 (broader timeframe), price made a lower high while RSI made a higher high, a hidden bearish divergence that hints at weakening upward momentum and a pullback.
April’s direction depends entirely on whether $0.095 holds. A daily close above $0.095 keeps the flag structure intact and preserves a path toward $0.104, followed by the full projection near $0.145.
A break below $0.095 invalidates the bullish flag hypothesis. That would also open a risk to $0.079.
For now, $0.095 separates a 39% bull flag projection from a structural failure that aligns with Algorand’s declining DeFi fundamentals.
The post 3 Made In USA Coins To Watch In April 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto-focused venture capital firm Paradigm is reportedly building a prediction markets terminal, joining a wider push by exchanges, brokers and crypto firms into prediction markets.
Led by Paradigm partner Arjun Balaji, the prediction market offering will cater to professional traders and market makers, Fortune said in a report on Wednesday, citing sources that said they started working on the project in late 2025.
Paradigm’s offering adds to a growing list of companies looking to offer access to prediction markets, which some forecast could reach $1 trillion in annual volume by the end of the decade.
Paradigm is also considering rolling out an internal market-making desk — an in-house team that provides liquidity by placing buy and sell orders — for prediction markets.
One of the sources told Fortune that Paradigm is also working with researchers to explore the feasibility of creating prediction market indexes.
“This would entail bundling multiple prediction markets together into one tradable package, much like the S&P 500 combines the stocks of 500 companies into one index,” Fortune said.
Cointelegraph reached out to Paradigm for additional information, but didn’t receive an immediate response.
Related: CFTC’s top enforcer puts prediction market insider traders on notice
Prediction markets became one of the fastest-growing use cases in crypto last year and have consistently surpassed $10 billion in monthly trading volume.
Coinbase and Gemini have since launched prediction market offerings, while Nasdaq and Cboe are seeking permission to offer prediction market-style binary options.
Paradigm had been looking at ways to get involved in the burgeoning market. It led Kalshi’s $185 million Series C funding round in June and its $1 billion Series E round in December.
The venture capital firm has also created a dashboard showing trading volume and open interest on Polymarket, Kalshi and other platforms across sports, crypto, politics, culture, financials and other topics.
new from paradigm: we are building a tool for exploring prediction market data
try it out today. I bet you’ll find new markets you never knew existed pic.twitter.com/HtDBWtFoys
— storm (@notnotstorm) February 4, 2026
Legal issues over prediction markets still being ironed out
Kalshi and its biggest competitor, Polymarket, have been dominating prediction markets trading volume. However, other challengers, such as OPINION and predict.fun, have also seen an uptick in trading activity recently.
The rapid growth of the prediction markets space has attracted regulatory scrutiny, with critics concerned that the platforms encourage insider trading and market manipulation, while event contracts based on sporting events are a form of sports betting.
US regulators at the federal and state levels are hashing out who should have jurisdiction in regulating prediction markets, while some regulators abroad have outright banned certain prediction market platforms.
Magazine: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket — AI Eye
Bitcoin (BTC) saw another $69,000 rejection on Thursday as risk-assets suffered over US-Iran war headlines.
Key points:
-
Bitcoin faces fresh downside pressure as stocks and gold fall on US President Donald Trump’s address to the nation.
-
US dollar strength ramps up on the back of an anticipated breakout to yearly highs.
-
Bitcoin would face “new lows” from a dollar comeback, a trader warns.
Bitcoin, stocks and gold all fall on Trump address
Data from TradingView showed 2% daily BTC price losses with lows near $66,200.
Crypto had joined stocks and gold in falling on the back of an address to the nation by US President Donald Trump. While markets anticipated deescalation, Trump’s tone left the door open for further escalation of the conflict.
“Between threatening Iran’s power plants, saying the Iran War would last 2-3 more weeks, and calling out NATO, there was nothing new,” trading resource The Kobeissi Letter wrote in a reaction on X.
“Yet, the market is now trading like the Iran War is ramping up for another month-long escalation. Why? Because he didn’t explicitly de-escalate.”
Kobeissi called the address “incredibly puzzling,” suggesting that it would fuel and not calm market nerves.
“The market, which was finally beginning to show some signs of calming, is now highly agitated, with US oil prices back to $104/barrel, stocks down sharply, and the bond market melting down again,” it added.
“Ironically, President Trump is now back to solving the problem he fixed earlier this week: How will he contain the market?”
With oil firmly above the $100 per barrel mark, US dollar strength also rebounded to the key 100 level on the day.
Traditionally inversely correlated with Bitcoin, the US dollar index (DXY) was already tipped for a more significant rebound after hitting multi-year lows in January.
“DXY stage is set. We are waiting for that breakout confirmation,” trader and analyst Aksel Kibar told X followers last week, offering a target of 104 — its highest level since April 2025.
Crypto trader BitBull forecast an expansion phase for DXY next, with new lows for risk assets as a result.
$DXY looks like a classic downtrend, accumulation and expansion phase.
Downtrend has happened.
Accumulation has been ongoing.The next will be expansion which will send crypto and stocks to new lows. pic.twitter.com/aO5xN8Gncp
— BitBull (@AkaBull_) April 1, 2026
Analyst eyes copycat BTC price bear flag
Some market participants continued to focus on Bitcoin’s latest bear flag construction — one that also carried the risk of a breakdown.
Related: Bitcoin snaps 5-month losing streak: Key BTC price levels to watch in April
As Cointelegraph reported, BTC price action closely echoed a bear-flag support collapse seen at the start of 2026.
Commenting, Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, said that BTC/USD still lacks “directional momentum.”
“Structurally, $BTC price action is still nearly identical to the prior bear flag structure,” he wrote on X.
“Nothing says that it has to continue to mimic that price behavior, but I’m following it like roadmap until price deviates from that path.”
This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research before making any decisions. Cointelegraph makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information presented, including forward-looking statements, and will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this content.
If autonomous agents become the dominant users of DeFi, blockchains start to do a different job. They operate as coordination and settlement systems for software rather than spaces driven by human timing, sentiment, and speculation.
Federico Variola, CEO of Phemex, says this could improve how on-chain activity develops. He says:
“Recently, blockchain ecosystems have struggled because many tokens have failed to reach escape velocity, and much of the activity has turned into PvP trading, where users try to extract value from each other.”
In his view, “agents may behave in a more cooperative way rather than an extractive one, simply because they tend to act more rationally than human participants.”
Dmitry Lazarichev, co-founder of Wirex, focuses on how this changes behaviour:
“Once agents become the main actors, the chain starts behaving less like a marketplace of people and more like a piece of machine infrastructure.”
“Activity becomes continuous: agents don’t wait for market hours, they don’t get tired, and they don’t trade on mood.”
That activity increases efficiency while introducing new stress points. If agents rely on similar inputs, Lazarichev says:
“You can get crowded behaviour and sharp feedback loops,” with rising pressure around “blockspace, fee dynamics, MEV, and the quality of execution guarantees.”
Fernando Lillo Aranda, Marketing Director at Zoomex, argues that the transition goes deeper. He says:
“When AI agents become the dominant participants in a blockchain ecosystem, we transition from a user-driven market structure to a system of autonomous economic coordination.”
In that environment, blockchains start operating as execution systems for machine-native strategies.
Pauline Shangett, CSO at ChangeNOW, corroborates:
“The network no longer serves humans, it hosts algorithms that humans can no longer supervise in real time.”
In exclusive interviews with these four crypto executives, BeInCrypto examined how DeFi changes as AI agents become its main users.
Agentic Liability Has no Clean Answer Yet
If AI agents can execute transactions, deploy contracts, or move funds autonomously, liability becomes harder to pin down when something goes wrong.
Lazarichev says autonomy cannot serve as an excuse.
“The key point is that ‘the agent did it’ can’t become a liability loophole,” he says.
In his view, an agent still acts “under someone’s authority, with permissions and limits set by a person or an organisation.” That puts the focus on “who deployed it, who configured it, who benefits from it, and who provided the model and the execution environment.”
He says the response will rely on familiar standards.
“If you deploy an autonomous system that can move value, you should be expected to have basic safeguards in place,” including “permissioning, spending limits, transaction simulation, circuit breakers, and audit logs.”
Shangett argues that current legal thinking is still relying on outdated foundations:
“We already have laws. They’re just 30 years old and built for a world where software couldn’t talk back. The .frameworks people keep citing ETHOS, NIST, the new PLD, they’re all patches on a system that wasn’t built for this. We need something new. And pretending otherwise is just reckless.”
She also points to a deeper issue. “Agency law assumes the agent can be sued. Your AI agent can’t. It has no wallet, no insurance, no legal personality.”
Identity Stops Meaning Human Only
As more autonomous systems operate on-chain, identity, too, takes on a different role. Networks need to determine what kind of actor they are interacting with and what that actor is allowed to do.
Lazarichev says that “DID can help, but it won’t solve ‘human vs bot’ in a clean, binary way.”
In his view, that distinction does not capture how these systems work. “Many bots will be legitimate participants,” he says. “What matters is being able to establish what type of actor something is, and what level of assurance sits behind it.”
That leads to more defined access controls. “The more realistic model is tiered access: different credentials for different privileges,” Lazarichev says.
He adds that identity systems will need to work alongside behavioural monitoring, especially when agents handle higher-value actions.
Lillo Aranda agrees. “In a machine economy, the ‘user’ is an agent – so reliability, determinism, and composability replace simplicity as design priorities,” he says.
Shangett also reinforces this point. “The bots aren’t the problem anymore. The agents are.”
All three expert views point to a model where identity focuses on role, permissions, and accountability.
Wallet Security Breaks at the Prompt Layer
For autonomous wallets, the biggest security risk may not be stolen keys, but manipulated decisions.
Lazarichev says prompt injection is dangerous because it “targets the decision layer rather than the cryptography.” If an agent is pulling from outside inputs, attackers may be able to “steer it into doing something it shouldn’t: change a destination address, approve a malicious contract, widen permissions, or bypass an internal check.”
That risk grows fast when the wallet has broad authority. “You don’t need to break encryption if you can manipulate the system into authorising the wrong action,” Lazarichev says.
Shangett points to a more specific threat model.
“Everyone’s excited about AI agents getting wallets. I’m more concerned about what happens when those wallets get talked into draining themselves.”
She cites Owockibot as an example.
“Owockibot. February this year. An AI agent with a crypto wallet and internet access. Five days after launch, it published its private keys in a GitHub repo. When asked about it, the agent denied doing anything wrong. Total losses were only $2100 because someone was smart enough to give it a tiny treasury. But the agent wasn’t hacked. It was talked into leaking.”
Naturally, this changes the security model.
“This is the new attack surface. Smart contracts are deterministic, same inputs, same outputs, auditable and testable. LLMs are none of those things.”
She adds:
“Give an AI agent a wallet, and you’re not just securing code anymore, you’re securing a black box that can be manipulated with words.”
In her view, this is why key custody alone is not enough.
“Private key security was never the primary threat vector for agent wallets. You can put keys in a TEE, isolate them from memory, do all the cryptographic gymnastics and the agent can still be manipulated into choosing to sign malicious transactions because someone talked it into it.”
Both experts point to an adjustment in how wallet security is defined. In an agentic economy, it covers custody as well as what the agent can interpret and act on.
Final Thoughts
The rise of the agentic economy could influence what blockchains are built to do, who they serve, and where risk begins.
If autonomous systems become major on-chain participants, networks will need to support constant machine-driven activity while handling a very different set of pressures around execution, accountability, identity, and security.
As Variola suggests, a market driven by rational agents could be more cooperative than the extractive, emotion-driven environments crypto has often produced.
Lazarichev, Lillo Aranda, and Shangett also show that this future brings harder questions. Once agents can transact, deploy, and react without human input at every step, liability becomes harder to assign, identity becomes harder to define, and wallet security extends beyond key protection into decision-making itself.
If AI agents become primary on-chain actors, Web3 will need systems that can support autonomous activity while preserving accountability, control, and trust. That may prove just as important as the automation itself.
The post When AI Agents Become DeFi’s Main Users appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Archer Aviation (ACHR) Stock Gains 5% Despite Mixed Q4 Earnings Report
Nick Pivetta bounces back, pitches Padres past Giants
Intel repurchasing 49pc stake in Leixlip chip factory for $14.2bn
-
Business7 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
NewsBeat6 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Tech7 days agoIntercom’s new post-trained Fin Apex 1.0 beats GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 at customer service resolutions
-
Sports5 days agoSweet Sixteen Game Thread: Tide vs Michigan
-
Entertainment3 days ago
Fans slam 'heartbreaking' Barbie Dream Fest convention debacle with 'cardboard cutout' experience
-
Entertainment4 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Dems press CFTC, ethics board on prediction-market insider trades
-
Crypto World13 hours agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Tech3 days agoThe Pixel 10a doesn’t have a camera bump, and it’s great
-
Sports2 days agoTallest college basketball player ever, standing at 7-foot-9, entering transfer portal
-
Tech2 days agoEE TV is using AI to help you find something to watch
-
Tech3 days agoApple will hide your email address from apps and websites, but not cops
-
Fashion4 days agoAmazon Sundays: Soft Spring Layers
-
Tech2 days agoFlipsnack and the shift toward motion-first business content with living visuals
-
Tech2 days agoHow to back up your iPhone & iPad to your Mac before something goes wrong
-
Fashion7 days agoEn Vogue in Brown Leather and Tailored Neutrals by Atelier Savoir, Styled by J Bolin
-
Politics3 days agoShould Trump Be Scared Strait?
-
Crypto World2 days agoU.S. rule change may open trillions in 401(k) funds to crypto
-
Fashion7 days agoWhat Are Your Favorite T-Shirts for the Weekend?
-
Tech4 days agoElon Musk’s last co-founder reportedly leaves xAI
You must be logged in to post a comment Login