Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

WLFI surges 10% after Apex stablecoin deal, outperforming BTC and ETH

Published

on

Trump-linked WLFI's Zak Folkman teases forex platform at Consensus Hong Kong

WLFI, the token tied to Trump-affiliated World Liberty Financial, rose roughly 10% after a $3.5 trillion asset servicer said it would test the firm’s USD1 stablecoin as a settlement rail for tokenized funds.

WLFI’s uptick during the Asia morning hours was higher than bitcoin or ether, which were both down 0.5%, according to CoinDesk market data.

The rally comes as speakers at the World Liberty Financial forum at Mar-a-Lago on Wednesday pitched stablecoins as central to U.S. financial leadership.

“The reality is the entire financial system is going to look very different in the next five years than it has looked in the last 50 years,” Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) said during the event. “This will happen somewhere. We’re going to see a massive amount of innovation in financial services. The question is, will it happen in America or somewhere else?”

Advertisement

Sen. Moreno emphasized that lawmakers must “get this market structure bill across the finish line in the next 90 days,” arguing that clear rules for digital assets are critical if the U.S. wants to lead the next phase of financial innovation rather than cede it overseas.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also spoke about the importance of the market structure bill at the event and said banking trade groups – not individual banks themselves – are responsible for the stalled progress.

World Liberty Financial co-founder Zak Folkman framed USD1 as more than a retail stablecoin, describing it as “an institutional-grade dollar” designed for real-world settlement and cross-border use.

“This is what we did when we wanted to build an institutional-grade dollar,” Folkman said, adding that the token will feature “real-time proof of reserves, powered by Chainlink,” allowing users to verify backing on-chain.

Advertisement

Earlier in February at Consensus in Hong Kong, Folkman teased an upcoming World Liberty Forex platform.

On Wednesday, Folkman positioned USD1 as a bridge for global payments, saying the project would begin with the U.S.-Mexico corridor before expanding to support up to 40 currencies. “This is USD1 as a settlement bridge,” he said.

Looking ahead, Folkman tied the stablecoin’s use case to artificial intelligence-driven commerce.

“We’re entering a world where AI agents will need to transact autonomously,” he said. “AI agents can’t open bank accounts, they can’t sign checks, but they can hold stablecoins.”

Advertisement

“What we’re building is a complete financial system,” Folkman added.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Drift Protocol Secures $147.5 Million Recovery Package After April 1 Exploit

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Tether will contribute up to $127.5M, including a $100M revenue-linked credit line, to fund Drift’s recovery pool.
  • Drift Protocol will issue a transferable recovery token to affected users, separate from the DRIFT governance token.
  • After relaunch, Drift will settle transactions in USDT instead of USDC, aligning with Tether’s direct involvement.
  • The $147.5M recovery package targets full coverage of $295M in outstanding user losses from the April 1 exploit.

Drift Protocol has secured a $147.5 million recovery package following an exploit that occurred on April 1. Tether will contribute up to $127.5 million, while additional partners will provide $20 million.

The funds will go toward covering $295 million in outstanding user losses. A dedicated recovery pool will be established using exchange revenue and committed support funds. The relaunch will also shift settlement from USDC to USDT.

Tether Leads Major Funding Effort to Address User Losses

Tether’s commitment forms the backbone of Drift Protocol’s recovery plan. The stablecoin issuer will provide a $100 million revenue-linked credit line as part of its contribution. Ecosystem grants and loans for market makers are also included in the package.

The recovery pool will draw from most of Drift’s exchange revenue going forward. Combined with the committed funds from Tether and partners, the pool targets full coverage of the $295 million owed to users. This structured approach ensures a steady flow of resources into the recovery effort.

Tether will also provide market-making support through designated market makers after the relaunch. This move ties the stablecoin issuer more closely to Drift’s ongoing operations. It also reflects a broader interest in stabilizing the protocol for long-term use.

Advertisement

Partners beyond Tether have pledged an additional $20 million to strengthen the package. This collective backing shows coordinated support from across the ecosystem. Together, the contributors form a unified front to restore user confidence in the protocol.

Recovery Token and Settlement Shift Mark Structural Changes for Drift

Drift will issue a dedicated recovery token to users affected by the April 1 exploit. This token is separate from the existing DRIFT governance token and carries a distinct function. It represents a direct claim on the recovery pool established through the funding package.

Advertisement

The recovery token is transferable, giving affected users flexibility in how they manage their claims. Users can hold or trade the token depending on their preference. This design allows market participants to price and move recovery claims as needed.

After relaunch, Drift will settle transactions in USDT instead of USDC. The switch aligns with Tether’s involvement and removes reliance on a competing stablecoin. It also streamlines operations by using the currency backed by the primary funder.

The structural shift to USDT settlement, paired with the recovery token issuance, reshapes how Drift will function going forward. These changes reflect decisions made in direct response to the exploit. They also establish a clearer operational framework as the protocol prepares to resume services.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

South Korea Moves to Replace Government Cards With Blockchain Deposit Tokens

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • South Korea’s Ministry of Finance will pilot blockchain deposit tokens for government expenses in Q4 2026.
  • Deposit tokens allow preset spending rules, removing the need for after-the-fact transaction reviews by officials.
  • Direct payments via deposit tokens eliminate third-party processors, cutting transaction fees for small businesses.
  • Sejong City serves as the launch point, with a step-by-step national expansion planned based on pilot results.

South Korea’s Ministry of Finance and Economy is set to replace government purchase cards with deposit tokens. These blockchain-based digital currency tools will be tested through a pilot launching in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Sejong City will serve as the starting point for the initiative. Deposit tokens carry built-in spending rules and represent actual currency on a blockchain. This is the second government use of digital currency for treasury fund execution in South Korea.

How Deposit Tokens Will Change Government Spending Controls

The existing framework reviews spending only after transactions have already occurred. Officials must then justify any payments made outside approved guidelines.

Deposit tokens change this by setting conditions in advance of any transaction. This prevents improper use and ensures automatic tracking across all payments.

Business promotion expenses are the first category the ministry targets with this change. Under current law, these expenses must be executed through government purchase cards.

Advertisement

A regulatory sandbox exemption now allows deposit tokens to replace this card-based method. No changes to existing legislation are required for the pilot to proceed.

The Ministry of Finance and Economy stated, “This project is the first case of a planned regulatory sandbox directly promoted by the Ministry of Finance and Economy from the review of the system.”

Officials added that it “is meaningful in that it can systematically verify the digital currency-based fiscal execution model.”

These remarks reflect the government’s confidence in the program’s broader potential. The ministry views this not just as a test but as a foundation for future fiscal reform.

Advertisement

Removing intermediaries is another feature the ministry expects to benefit small businesses. Direct payments through deposit tokens bypass third-party processors entirely.

This is expected to lower transaction fees for vendors receiving government payments. The cost savings could be meaningful for smaller businesses operating within the public procurement space.

Sejong City Pilot to Guide Expansion of the Blockchain Program

The pilot project will begin in Sejong City in the fourth quarter of 2026. The ministry will finalize the scope of the demonstration and select participating businesses beforehand.

Results from the Sejong City phase will determine how the program expands further. A step-by-step rollout is planned based on what the pilot data shows.

Advertisement

The ministry noted that “the transparency of execution will increase by being able to preset and manage the time and industry that can be executed.”

Currently, business promotion expenses used during late nights or weekends require after-the-fact explanations. With deposit tokens, those restrictions are programmed directly into the payment system. This removes the need for manual reviews of time-sensitive transactions.

Deposit tokens differ from standard crypto assets in key ways. They are stable in value and carry programmed rules that restrict how they are spent.

These features make them more suitable for controlled public finance applications. The South Korean government sees them as a practical tool for modernizing how it manages public funds.

Advertisement

The regulatory sandbox framework remains central to the legal structure of this pilot. Since current regulations require purchase cards, the sandbox grants a temporary exemption for testing purposes.

The ministry will use findings from the pilot to assess whether permanent regulatory reform is needed. A positive outcome could support a broader shift toward blockchain-based government payments across South Korea.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple Tokenized Bond Pilot Kicks Off in Korea

Published

on

South Korea arrests two suspects in $1.5M Bitcoin evidence theft

Ripple tokenized bond pilot with Kyobo Life Insurance, one of South Korea’s largest insurers, targets near real-time government bond settlement using Ripple Custody, replacing a process that currently takes two days to settle.

Summary

  • Ripple and Kyobo Life Insurance announced on April 15 Korea’s first blockchain-based government bond settlement pilot, compressing the standard T+2 cycle to near real-time using Ripple Custody.
  • Kyobo Life, with over $92 billion in assets, becomes the first Tier-1 Korean insurer to adopt on-chain bond infrastructure, with plans to also explore RLUSD stablecoin payment rails.
  • The deal does not create direct XRP demand today as it uses Ripple Custody rather than ODL, but XRP still rallied 6% to $1.42 on Thursday, emerging as the top gainer among the top-10 assets.

Ripple tokenized bond pilot with Kyobo Life Insurance, announced April 15, marks Korea’s first institutional attempt to settle government bonds on blockchain infrastructure. The deal targets the standard two-day settlement window that has long defined fixed-income markets, compressing it to near real-time through Ripple Custody, the company’s bank-grade digital asset custody platform.

Kyobo Life, a Tier-1 Korean insurer managing over $92 billion in assets, is the first major insurance institution in the country to adopt this model.

Advertisement

Ripple Custody acts as the infrastructure layer, handling the holding, transfer, and settlement of tokenized Korean government bonds on-chain. Both the bond and the payment leg settle simultaneously on a single ledger, eliminating the counterparty risk that accumulates during a standard multi-day settlement cycle and freeing up capital that would otherwise sit idle.

Kyobo Life will also explore stablecoin-based payment rails through Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin, which is already listed on Korean exchange Coinone, enabling 24-hour transaction capability outside normal banking hours.

The partnership is explicitly structured as a pilot and feasibility study. No transaction sizes, go-live dates, or specific bond series have been disclosed. Korean regulators have not yet developed a complete legal framework for tokenized securities, and both companies describe the arrangement as a foundation to assess technical and regulatory feasibility before moving to production.

Advertisement

Why Korea, Why Now

Korea has licensed payment providers for remittance since 2017 and is one of Asia’s most active markets for regulated crypto adoption. Ripple has been building its Korean presence for 14 months, partnering with custodian BDACS in February 2025 and achieving exchange listings across Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit by August 2025.

SBI Holdings, Ripple’s long-term Japanese institutional partner, is also an investor in Kyobo Life, connecting Ripple’s Japan and Korea strategies through the same financial network. The deal also plugs into Ripple’s broader Asia-Pacific push that includes participation in Singapore’s Monetary Authority BLOOM initiative and a move to acquire BC Payments in Australia.

Fiona Murray, Managing Director for Asia Pacific at Ripple, said “Korea’s institutional financial market is at an inflection point” and described the Kyobo deal as “the beginning of a broad and enduring partnership, not only with Kyobo, but with the Korean institutional financial market as a whole.”

Jin Ho Park, Senior Executive Vice President at Kyobo Life, said the partnership is “not simply about digital assets — it’s about validating how traditional financial instruments can operate securely and efficiently on blockchain.”

Advertisement

What It Means for XRP Price

The Kyobo deal uses Ripple Custody rather than On-Demand Liquidity, meaning it does not create direct XRP purchase demand today. Despite this, XRP rallied 6% to $1.42 on Thursday, reclaiming fourth place by market cap with its market capitalization moving back above $87 billion.

Analysts say the deal adds institutional credibility to Ripple’s real-world settlement thesis, which becomes more valuable once the CLARITY Act passes and banks gain legal cover to use XRP in cross-border payment networks. Until then, the XRP price connection to Kyobo is narrative rather than structural.

Ripple and Kyobo Life partnered to modernize Korea’s bond markets at a moment when Ripple’s global institutional footprint is expanding faster than at any point since its SEC lawsuit ended in 2024.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Circle Hit With Class Action Suit Over $280M Drift Hack

Published

on

Circle Hit With Class Action Suit Over $280M Drift Hack

Circle Internet Group is facing a class action lawsuit led by a Drift Protocol investor claiming it failed to freeze funds stolen in a $280 million exploit of the protocol on April 1.

The lawsuit was filed by Drift investor Joshua McCollum on behalf of over 100 members in a US district court in Massachusetts on Wednesday, which accused Circle of allowing the attackers to transfer about $230 million worth of USDC (USDC) from Solana to Ethereum via Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) over several hours without intervention.

“Circle permitted this criminal use of its technology and services,” attorneys representing McCollum wrote, adding: “These losses would not have occurred, or would have been substantially reduced, had Circle taken timely action.”

The suit accuses Circle of aiding and abetting conversion as well as negligence. Mira Gibb, the law firm representing McCollum and other Drift investors, is seeking damages, with the final amount to be determined at trial.

Advertisement

The case touches on a legal grey area around crypto companies that retain control over user funds. While such companies may have the technical ability to intervene or freeze assets, they often cite regulatory constraints or the lack of immediate legal authority as reasons for inaction — leaving accountability unclear as exploits unfold in real-time.

Source: James Seyffart

McCollum’s lawyers pointed out that Circle froze 16 USDC wallets in connection with a sealed US civil case about a week before the Drift incident to argue that Circle had the technical capacity to do the same.

Cointelegraph reached out to Circle for comment, but didn’t receive an immediate response.

Crypto analytics firm Elliptic suspected the exploit was committed by North Korean state-backed hackers, who made over 100 transactions via Circle’s bridging technology during US working hours, where the stablecoin company is based.

Related: Ukraine arrests FBI-wanted cybercrime suspect, seizes $11M in assets

Advertisement

The funds were converted into Ether (ETH) and sent through the Tornado Cash privacy protocol to launder the proceeds and obscure the trail.

Circle was put in a lose-lose position: ARK Invest

While Circle faced backlash for the inaction, ARK Invest’s director of research for digital assets, Lorenzo Valente, argued on Thursday that it made the right decision, arguing that freezing funds without a legal order opens the door for arbitrary discretion.

“Every future freeze is now a judgment call. Every non-freeze is a political statement. Why freeze the Drift hacker but not that sketchy Nigerian fraud wallet? Why this protester but not that one?”

While Valente sided with Circle’s decision, he speculated that the stolen funds will likely fund North Korea’s nuclear weapons program:

“Whether Circle got it right comes down to how much you weigh rule-of-law principles vs concrete harm. Reasonable people disagree.”

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?

Advertisement