As moviemaking as an industry continues to have higher and higher budgets for its most promising blockbuster releases, the potential for massive profits grows ever higher, with prominent modern-day successes having the possibility to be among the highest-grossing films in box office history. However, the risk of such high budgets also means that there is potential for catastrophic box office bombs, losing not just tens of millions of dollars, but losing over a hundred million dollars at the box office.
These hundred-million-dollar losers in the world of box office are far from a new phenomenon, but are certainly much more prominent as the budgets for blockbusters have skyrocketed to exceptional heights in recent years. On top of the high-budget films that completely failed to meet the mark, this can also apply to older or mid-budget blockbusters that had close to zero interest at the box office. These films have become infamous as some of Hollywood’s biggest financial failures.
Advertisement
10
‘The Marvels’ (2023)
Image via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
For the vast majority of its existence, the MCU has stood as an unbreakable beacon of blockbuster success, with even the smallest of successes still earning hundreds of millions of dollars in profit for Disney and catapulting it as one of the most lucrative box-office franchises out there. However, the hot streak eventually had to end for the MCU, and while they were certainly trending downward throughout the 2020s, The Marvels was their first true box-office bomb, losing the studio $237 million.
The film was largely a victim of terrible timing to be an MCU release, faltering thanks to a string of lackluster releases in the years prior, leading to a complete lack of interest in Carol Danvers’ intergalactic adventure. Most films in an extended universe being asked to follow up the likes of Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania and Secret Invasion were going to falter. The lukewarm execution of The Marvels only made Brie Larson’s MCU outing that much more of a box-office disappointment.
Advertisement
9
‘John Carter’ (2012)
Image via Walt Disney Pictures
Attempting to follow in the footsteps of massive sci-fi blockbusters like Avatar, John Carter has stood as one of the most recognizable examples of box-office disaster, with its massive budget resulting in middling failure that lost Disney $200 million. The thought process was that, since the original John Carter books were massively influential in sci-fi storytelling, they could find similar success if these classic stories were given an extravagant, blockbuster budget.
However, while the film may have largely influenced a lot of sci-fi worlds, this, in tandem, only made the eventual film adaptation feel incredibly generic and uninteresting to general audiences. The film just didn’t have a hook for audiences to really engage with, ironically debuting at second place behind The Lorax. What really hurt the film is that it was one of the most expensive movies of all time, with its overwhelming budget making its $248.1 million box office gross nowhere close to what it needed to find success.
Advertisement
8
‘Haunted Mansion’ (2023)
LaKeith Stanfield as Ben Matthias looking over the rim of his glasses at a tourist in Haunted Mansion.Image via Disney
Yet another one of the many box-office disappointments that Disney had during 2023, Haunted Mansion stood as one of the most lackluster and poorly executed remakes of recent memory. Despite the film being relatively well-received by the audiences that did experience it, the film had one of the most shockingly ineffective release strategies imaginable that destroyed the movies chances of success before it even released.
Despite overwhelmingly dripping in Halloween and autumnal energy in all of its marketing and its very existence, the film, for some reason, had its wide theatrical release in the middle of the summer, a time when nobody was clamoring for Halloween-adjacent cinema. While this technically allowed the film to release on Disney+ when Halloween actually came around, it meant that it was never going to recoup its $150 million budget. As a result, the film lost around $117 million and further amplified Disney’s catastrophic year.
Advertisement
7
‘Mortal Engines’ (2018)
Two young resistance fighters stands in a large metal structure, looking down at something with dread.Image via Universal Pictures
Produced and co-written by Peter Jackson and adapting a beloved series of young adult novels, Mortal Engines had high hopes of being the next big YA dystopian franchise, following in the footsteps of the likes of The Hunger Games and The Maze Runner. However, the book’s greatness didn’t translate into this bloated, sci-fi mess of a blockbuster, and the film instead became infamous as one of the biggest box-office flops of the 21st century.
The film almost single-handedly killed a lot of the interest in YA adaptations as a whole, as its cataclysmic $219 million loss spelled out to studios that simply adapting a beloved YA novel series was no longer an easy path to blockbuster success. It certainly didn’t help that critics and audiences alike did not enjoy this overstuffed mess of a blockbuster, with its debut being completely overshadowed by the release of Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse.
Advertisement
6
‘Mulan’ (2020)
Image via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
It would have been incredibly easy to fill this list with films that were directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as the complete shutdown of theaters transformed many films that would have been blockbuster hits into gargantuan money losers. Easily one of the most prominent was the live-action remake of Mulan, which lost upwards of $141 million, due to not even having a theatrical release in the U.S. Like several other prominent releases of the era, the film instead had a large-scale PVOD release, allowing people to rent the film for $30 on Disney+.
This $30 release was seen as incredibly controversial when the film was first released, both due to its increased price compared to many other premium rentals and the film itself not being worth this price tag. While it’s difficult to tell exactly how much the film earned from these premium online rentals, the pandemic still had a major effect on the film’s attempted theatrical outings in the rest of the world. The only legacy the film has nowadays is as yet another drop in the bucket for Disney’s terrible live-action remakes.
Advertisement
5
‘Missing Link’ (2019)
Mr. Link looking nervous
Image via Laika
Many people are quick to associate the prospects of massive box office bombs with the films themselves being of astronomically low quality, yet Missing Link is an exceptionally charming, award-winning animated film that just did not connect with general audiences at the box office. LAIKA as an animation studio has always placed its artistry first before commercial success, leading to a case such as this, where the most expensive stop-motion animated film of all time only earned $26.6 million at the box office.
The film never had a chance to connect or make an impact with audiences, debuting at #9 at the domestic box office and being massively overshadowed by every other film that was playing in theaters. Its prospects were made even worse when, during its 3rd weekend, any chance of legs were shut out by the release of Avengers: Endgame. However, box-office failure was not the end of Missing Link’s story, as it went on to be nominated for Best Animated Feature at the Academy Awards and actually won the award at the Golden Globes.
Advertisement
4
‘Chaos Walking’ (2021)
If Mortal Engines was the failed last rallying cry of the YA genre, then Chaos Walking was the far too late whimper of air released from the corpse of the genre’s box-office prospects. This painfully generic dystopian sci-fi film, with the all-star casting lineup of Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley, was not only crippled by the pandemic but also went through a myriad of production issues. It was eventually decided that Lionsgate would cut its losses and release this hobbled-together mess of a film, losing $132.3 million and even being a write-down for Lionsgate.
The film itself is about as generic as a dystopian YA film can get, being one of the absolute worst modern sci-fi films and wasting the talents of just about everyone involved. It would have been a box office failure even if it had been released at a more opportune time, yet its brazen release in March 2021 was the final nail in the coffin for any attempt at the film finding box-office success.
Advertisement
3
‘Strange World’ (2022)
Jake Gyllenhaal as Searcher Clade and Legend in Strange WorldImage via Disney
The film releases from Walt Disney Animation Studios in the 2020s have acted as a microcosm of the prospects and misaligned prospects of audiences and studios alike. While sequels like Moana 2 and Zootopia 2 grossed billions of dollars, Strange World crashed harder than any other animated film in the studio’s history. The family sci-fi film lost $197 million and ironically got beaten out during its release of Thanksgiving week by Disney’s own Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, which released weeks prior.
This friendly fire paints a picture of Disney not having faith in this film to perform at the box office, and possibly even an act of purposeful self-destruction if you’re open to this type of conspiracy (the film did happen to feature Disney’s first LGBTQ+ lead character). However, the fact that the film has completely disappeared from the public eye in the years following its release paints a greater picture of the overall lack of interest that audiences had for this generic, largely boring movie.
Advertisement
2
‘Monster Trucks’ (2016)
Creech reuniting with Lucas TillImage via Paramount Pictures
Sometimes, one can just look at a film and immediately tell that there is nothing of quality within its filmmaking; all the more shocking is when one of these films has an absurdly high budget that it was never going to earn back. Monster Trucks is one such laughably bad idea, being a family movie that follows a tentacle creature who consumes gasoline and hides inside a car, transforming it into a literal monster truck. This awful family movie somehow managed to have a $125 million budget, causing it to lose hundreds of millions of dollars and be a write-down for Paramount before it even came out.
It’s a strange case where the film was understood to be a cataclysmic financial failure before it even touched the big-screen, placing its very existence into question more and more. The film certainly lived up to its perceived lack of quality and bombed at the box office, still standing as one of the biggest box-office failures that Nickelodeon and Paramount have ever released.
Advertisement
1
‘Mars Needs Moms’ (2011)
Image via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Losing hundreds of millions of dollars is one thing, but few films manage to lose so much money that they almost single-handedly shut down the studio that helped bring the film to life. Mars Needs Moms is one such film, whose massive losses not only gave it the reputation of one of the biggest bombs of all time, but also caused the closing of Robert Zemeckis’s mocap animation studio ImageMovers Digital.
Being at the forefront of releasing this type of technically advanced motion capture animation with the likes of Polar Express and A Christmas Carol, this film’s gargantuan failure has eliminated any interest in this method of 3D animation. It’s hard to think of another box-office bomb that has had such an overwhelming and destructive impact upon the industry and the people who created the film, losing hundreds of millions in the process and becoming an icon of utter failure in every regard.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz Which Oscar Best Picture Is Your Perfect Movie? Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
Advertisement
🐦Birdman
🪙No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
01
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.
Advertisement
02
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?
Advertisement
03
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
Advertisement
04
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
Advertisement
05
What do you want from a film’s ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
Advertisement
06
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.
Advertisement
07
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
Advertisement
08
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
Advertisement
09
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
Advertisement
10
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Advertisement
Parasite
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Advertisement
Everything Everywhere All at Once
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
Advertisement
Oppenheimer
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Advertisement
Birdman
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
Advertisement
No Country for Old Men
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox allowed Grace Van Patten to work with sister Anna Van Patten, who then went on to appear in a graphic sex scene as Kitty on Euphoria.
Grace, who is Anna’s older sister, grew up with her siblings in New York City before attending Fiorello H. LaGuardia High School. After being directed by her father, Timothy Van Patten, in an episode of The Sopranos, Grace continued to find success with roles in Boardwalk Empire, Maniac and Nine Perfect Strangers.
Grace skyrocketed to fame after being cast as Lucy in Hulu’sTell Me Lies. She went on to score the lead role as Amanda Knox in a limited series, which will chronicle the period after Knox was wrongfully accused in Meredith Kercher’s murder trial, her time in prison and her journey to freedom. Margaret Qualley was originally set to play Knox in Hulu’s scripted series, but she exited the project and Grace replaced her.
“I’ll say that Grace is f***ing amazing. That’s what I will say,” Knox exclusively told Us Weekly in March 2025. “I’m in a very, very privileged position as someone who is a subject of a story. Typically someone in my position — the subject — doesn’t get to be an executive producer of their own show.”
Keep scrolling for what to know about Anna after she collaborated with Grace on The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox:
What TV Shows Did Anna Van Patten Work On Before ‘The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox’?
Disney/Andrea Miconi
Anna made appearances on Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, FBI: Most Wanted, Gossip Girl and she has been cast in season 3 of Euphoria.
Who Else Is Part of Grace and Anna’s Famous Family?
Disney/John Nacion
Grace and Anna’s father is director and producer Timothy Van Patten and mother is Wendy Rossmeyer Van Patten. Their uncle is comic actor Dick Van Patten and their cousin is actress Talia Balsam, who is the daughter of Joyce Van Patten. Grace and Anna have a younger sister: June.
What Has Anna Shared About Her Career?
Disney/Adrienn Szabó
During a joint interview with her mother in January 2025, Anna spoke with Modern Luxury about breaking into the industry.
“I went to a performing arts high school where you could major in a subject. I majored in drama, and then I went to the New School for college where I studied film,” she explained. “I think learning all aspects of film can only teach me more about the art as a whole. I think that having Gossip Girl as my first job is teaching me a lot, because there’s really nothing like learning from being on set.”
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
Anna continued: “I’m so thankful for that, but I really want to learn to be more hands-on behind the camera. I think this is all teaching me a lot for potential future projects.”
Have Grace and Anna Worked Together Before?
Disney/Andrea Miconi
The sisters shared the screen for the first time in Hulu’s The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox, which premiered in August 2025. Grace played Amanda while Anna Van Patten was cast as her sister, Deanna. The rest of the Knox family was portrayed by Sharon Horgan and John Hoogenakker.
What Role Does Anna Van Patten Have in ‘Euphoria’?
HBO
Anna appeared in season 3 as a newcomer at the strip club. The dancer — who is named Kitty — has a brutal start at her new job when she has to have sex with a group of men.
There have been movies made about World War II since its conclusion, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t more stories to tell. The conflict was the largest in human history, and was filled with countless stories of heroism, many of which have never been addressed. “Operation Mincemeat” was an operation by the British military told by author Ben Macintyre in a 2010 novel that described the unusual plan. Although the novel had helped to publicize a story that hadn’t received much attention, Netflix’s Operation Mincemeat brought to life one of World War II’s strangest moments with the help of some of the greatest British actors working today. Beyond the fact that Operation Mincemeat is legitimately informative, it’s also a great work of entertainment that understands why World War II is such a compelling cinematic subject.
Operation Mincemeat examines a particularly dangerous moment in World War II when the Allies had prepared an invasion of Sicily, which could’ve turned the tide of the war through the advantages of European expansion. In order to ensure that the attack is a surprise, Admiral John Godfrey (Jason Isaacs) came up with a strategy to leak false information about an invasion of Greece that would confuse the Nazis, forcing them to mount their defenses elsewhere. The only way to pass along the fake details to the Nazis was to create false plans that were placed on the body of a fallen soldier, who could be intercepted. The unlikely heroes of Operation Mincemeatare Lieutenant Commander Ewen Montagu (Colin Firth) and Flight Lieutenant Charles Christopher Cholmondeley (Matthew Macfadyen), who are tasked with identifying the corpse and giving it the necessary preparations. While it is a war movie, first and foremost, Operation Mincemeat contains elements of the espionage and heist genres.
Advertisement
Netflix’s ‘Operation Mincemeat’ Uncovers an Undiscovered WWII True Story
Operation Mincemeat is effective at showing the substantial pressure put upon the Allied forces at this point in the war, which has already proven to be devastating and responsible for millions of lives lost. The film shows how the Allies became more interested in untraditional strategies, as to simply wage war through endless combat zones would only become more destructive. The irony of the film is that Montagu and Cholmondeley find that the body of a vagrant could end up being responsible for an operation that brings forward peace. Even though this man, who is disguised as a soldier, did not get to enjoy the virtues of life in his own time, he may be helpful in awarding those freedoms to countless others. Although there is some humor in how the film describes how inherently unusual this mission was, it also shows a respectfulness for the deceased that is necessary for the given subject.
Operation Mincemeat is distinct from other World War II films because it examines the unspoken heroism of those who were not in positions of authority. Among the complications of the secret mission is that Cholmondeley and Montagu understand that their actions will have to be classified in the immediate aftermath, and they may not receive the laudatory praise of their peers if their operation is successful. This opened the door to a deeper understanding of the ethics of spycraft, especially since future James Bond author Ian Flemingis a character in the film, played by Johnny Flynn. While being able to work in secret could have given Montagu and Cholmondeley the excuse to take a more ruthless, immoral approach, their insistence on remaining honorable shows the importance of retaining ethics. Montagu and Cholmondeley believe that victory cannot be attained through malicious means, as they don’t want to fall into the same path of deceit and manipulation that hallmarked their enemies.
Advertisement
Netflix’s ‘Operation Mincemeat’ Examines the Complexity of Victory
Colin Firth smiling in Operation MincemeatImage via Netflix
Operation Mincemeat is a terrific ensemble film, as it shows that all of those that participated in the operation were integral to its success, and that a war could not be won by simply one brave soldier. Firth has had some experience starring in World War II films, such as The King’s Speech and The Railway Man, but he gives one of his most underrated performances ever as Montagu. Montagu is distraught throughout because he is separated from his family, who have been sent to remain in safety in the United States, which makes him feel even more alienated as he remains in Europe. He’s also Jewish, and there have been rumors about what Adolf Hitler did to the population of Poland, even if the more disturbing details of the Holocaust were not uncovered by the Allies at this point in history. While both of these stresses weigh down on Montagu, Firth shows the integrity of a man who put his best foot forward and served as a role model for those under his command.
The Operation Mincemeat story has strangely become even more popular since the film’s release, as a Broadway musical of the same name became incredibly successful, even if it took a slightly more comical approach. However, Operation Mincemeat is unique among war films because it showed how many of the most pivotal moments in the conflict were made in meetings and boardrooms. While this may not seem as inherently exciting as a film like Saving Private Ryan that is set within the trenches, Operation Mincemeat showed that heroism takes many forms, and that some of the most valiant efforts are kept secret.
Over two decades have passed since Denzel Washington played one of his most iconic characters, John Creasy, in the cult classic action film Man on Fire. The film was directed by his frequent creative collaborator, the late filmmaker Tony Scott. While Man on Fire wasn’t exactly a major blockbuster — it grossed around $130 million worldwide against a reported budget of $70 million — it became a home-video sensation in subsequent years. In many ways, it paved the way for Liam Neeson‘s Taken and for Washington’s own The Equalizer movies. Netflix is aware of the film’s popularity, which explains why the streamer greenlit a reimagined series. The new show debuted this week and emerged as an instant hit on the platform.
Collider Exclusive · Action Hero Quiz Which Action Hero Would Be Your Perfect Partner? Rambo · James Bond · Indiana Jones · John McClane · Ethan Hunt
Five legends. Five completely different ways of getting out alive — with style, with muscle, with charm, with luck, or with a plan so intricate it probably shouldn’t work. Ten questions will reveal which action hero was built to have your back.
🎖️Rambo
🍸James Bond
🏺Indiana Jones
Advertisement
🔧John McClane
🎭Ethan Hunt
Advertisement
01
You’re dropped into a dangerous situation with no warning. What do you need most from a partner? The first few seconds tell you everything about who belongs beside you.
Advertisement
02
You have to get somewhere dangerous, fast. How do you travel? How you get there is half the mission.
Advertisement
03
You’re pinned down and outnumbered. What does your ideal partner do? This is when you find out what someone is really made of.
Advertisement
04
The mission is paused. You have one evening to decompress. What does your partner suggest? Who someone is when the pressure drops is who they actually are.
Advertisement
05
How do you prefer your partner to communicate mid-mission? Good communication is the difference between partners and a liability.
Advertisement
06
Your enemy is powerful, well-resourced, and has the upper hand. How should your partner approach them? The approach to the enemy defines the partnership.
Advertisement
07
Things go badly wrong and you’re captured. What do you trust your partner to do? Who someone is when you need them most is the only thing that matters.
Advertisement
08
What does your ideal partner bring to the table that you couldn’t replace? A great partner fills the gap you didn’t know you had.
Advertisement
09
Every partnership has a cost. Which of these can you live with? No one comes without baggage. The question is whether you can carry it together.
Advertisement
10
It’s the final moment. Everything is on the line. What do you need from your partner right now? The last question is the most honest one.
Advertisement
Your Partner Has Been Assigned Your Perfect Partner Is…
Your answers have pointed to one action hero above all others. This is the person built to have your back — for better or considerably, spectacularly worse.
Advertisement
Rambo
Your partner doesn’t talk much, doesn’t need to, and will have assessed every threat in your immediate environment before you’ve finished your first sentence. John Rambo is not a man of plans or politics — he is a force of nature shaped by survival, loyalty, and a capacity for endurance that goes beyond anything training can produce. He will not leave you behind. He has never left anyone behind who deserved to come home. What you get with Rambo is the most capable, most quietly ferocious partner imaginable — one who has been through things that would have broken anyone else, and who chose to keep going anyway. You’ll never need to ask if he has your back. You’ll just know.
James Bond
Advertisement
Your partner will arrive perfectly dressed, perfectly briefed, and with a cover story so convincing it’ll take you a moment to remember what’s actually true. James Bond is the most professionally dangerous person in any room he enters — and the most disarmingly charming, which is the point. He operates in a world of layers, where nothing is what it appears and every advantage is used without apology. You’ll never be bored. You’ll occasionally be furious. But when it matters — when the mission is genuinely on the line and the margin for error has collapsed to nothing — Bond is exactly the partner you want. He has survived things that have no business being survivable. He does it with style. That is not nothing.
Indiana Jones
Your partner will know the history, the language, the cultural context, and exactly why the thing everyone else is ignoring is actually the most important thing in the room. Indiana Jones is brilliant, reckless, and occasionally impossible — but he is also one of the most resourceful, most genuinely knowledgeable partners you could find yourself beside. He approaches every situation with a scholar’s eye and a brawler’s instinct, which is an unusual combination and a remarkably effective one. He hates snakes and gets personally attached to objects of historical significance, both of which will slow you down at least once. It doesn’t matter. What Indy brings is irreplaceable — and the adventures you’ll have together will be the kind people write books about. Assuming you survive them.
Advertisement
John McClane
Your partner was not supposed to be here. He does not have the right equipment, the right information, or anything approaching the right odds. He has a sarcastic remark and an absolute refusal to accept that the situation is as bad as it looks. John McClane is the greatest accidental hero in the history of action cinema — a man whose superpower is stubbornness, whose contingency plan is improvisation, and whose capacity to absorb punishment and keep moving would be alarming if it weren’t so useful. He will complain the entire time. He will make it significantly more chaotic than it needed to be. And he will absolutely, unconditionally, without question come through when it counts. Yippee-ki-yay.
Advertisement
Ethan Hunt
Your partner has already run seventeen scenarios by the time you’ve finished reading the briefing, and the plan he’s settled on involves at least two things that should be physically impossible. Ethan Hunt operates at the absolute edge of human capability — technically, physically, and intellectually — and he brings the same relentless precision to protecting his partners that he brings to dismantling organisations that shouldn’t exist. He is not easy to know and he will never fully tell you everything. But he will carry the weight of the mission so completely, so absolutely, that your job is simply to trust him — and the remarkable thing is that trusting him always turns out to be the right call. The mission will be impossible. He will complete it anyway.
Advertisement
‘Reacher’ Fans Have Something to Bide Their Time with While They Wait for a New Season
Man on Fire currently holds a 60% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, which is higher than the 39% score of the 2004 movie, but is simply not good enough for long-term success. In her review, Collider’s Carly Lane described it as a “perfect binge for Reacher” fans, but noted that it “is more of a slow burn than an instantaneous firestorm.” Despite the mixed initial reactions from critics, the show emerged as Netflix’s number one title both domestically and worldwide, according to FlixPatrol. Meanwhile, Washington is gearing up to reprise his role as Robert McCall in two more movies in The Equalizer franchise. The series’ three movies so far have each generated higher global box-office returns than the Man on Fire movie, and have remained hot favorites on streaming. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Release Date
April 30, 2026
Advertisement
Network
Netflix
Showrunner
Advertisement
Kyle Killen
Directors
Steven Caple Jr., Vicente Amorim, Clare Kilner, Michael Cuesta
Olivia Wilde publicly responded to social media trolls who likened her appearance to The Lord of the Rings’ Gollum.
After attending a screening of her new movie The Invite at the San Francisco International Film Festival on April 24, Wilde’s red carpet interview with San Francisco Chronicle sparked online commentary around her facial features, with some social media users drawing comparisons to the physically deformed fictional creature.
In a Sunday, May 3, Instagram Story shared by Wilde, 42, her brother Charlie Chockburn was heard asking his older sister, “Olivia Wilde, do you care to address recent rumors that you’re a resurrected corpse?”
A giggling Wilde, lying in a bed wearing a hoodie and surrounded by blankets, responded, “Listen, that is a fisheye lens and I admit, is that my best angle or was that my best ever look? No. No, it’s startling, it’s a startling image.”
Advertisement
The post included a screenshot of Wilde’s face during the interview, positioned next to an image of Gollum from one of the fantasy trilogy’s films. “It was a fisheye lens and I don’t know why [I] was so close to the camera, I didn’t have to be,” Wilde continued. “That’s not the truth. Do you have any more questions?”
Wilde’s comments drew loud laughter from Cockburn, 33, before the amused Don’t Worry Darling actress and director concluded to the camera, “I’m not dead.”
Did Olivia Wilde just confirm her relationship with Caspar Jopling? One of her sexy photos from the Sundance Film Festival points to a soft launch for the couple. “I Want Your Sex & The Invite ♥️ Park City 4vrrrr,” Wilde, 41, captioned a series of Instagram pictures on Wednesday, January 28, from the annual festival […]
Wilde further captioned the post, “Leave it to your little brother to give you the maximum amount of s***.”
In the days that followed Wilde’s San Francisco Chronicle interview, which discussed how essential San Franscico was as a backdrop within The Invite, starring Wilde, Seth Rogan, Edward Norton and Penelope Cruz, her appearance drew significant online commentary. In addition to Gollum comparisons, questions regarding cosmetic procedures and weight-loss methods arose via social media.
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
One social media user wrote via Instagram, “My thoughts and prayers are with @oliviawilde and her injector.”
Olivia Wilde may have a new man: art dealer and Ellie Golding’s ex-husband, Caspar Jopling. On Thursday, September 4, Wilde was spotted making out with Jopling outside London’s The Pelican restaurant in photos obtained by Page Six. Jopling was previously married to Golding from 2019 up until they announced their split in February 2024. The […]
The media attention comes on the back of Wilde seemingly confirming her new romance with art dealer Caspar Jopling. In an Instagram post shared on January 28, Wilde was seen snuggling up to a man, whom Us Weekly reported at the time was Jopling, 34. In the cozy snap, Wilde was captured with her eyes closed as Jopling, who is Ellie Goulding’s former husband, hugged her tight with his arms wrapped around her back. (Goulding, 39, and Jopling share one son, Arthur, 4. The exes announced their split in February 2024.)
Wilde and Jopling were first linked after photos published by Page Six in September 2025 showed the pair kissing outside a London restaurant.
“I’m only in one relationship now,” Kelsey told Us Weekly exclusively ahead of last month’s RHORI premiere. “You’ll see as the season progresses where that goes, but I am in a relationship. [I have a] boyfriend, I will label it that, but not married, and no kids.”
The Sunday, May 3 episode of RHORI offered more insight into Kelsey as she moved on from an “unconventional” 10-year relationship which turned her into “a lady of leisure.”
Kelsey and her ex were able to date other people while they were together, but during Sunday’s episode she explained that he was dating “more people than she initially” thought.
Advertisement
“I want [a] real solid relationship, like I have to make a move now, for me,” Kelsey said in her confessional on Sunday. Her ex said that she was making “the right decision” for her future.
Noam Galai/Bravo
“He didn’t even fight it,” she said. (Aside from her ex, who didn’t make an appearance on the Bravo show, Kelsey introduced viewers to William “Bill” L’Europa, who was referred to as her boyfriend during Sunday’s episode.)
Kelsey told Us that the “hardest” part of her post-breakup transition was moving out of her ex’s mansion.
“I handle change very well, believe it or not. It’s just thatI didn’t want to handle it,” she said, “I didn’t want to have to. Especially the timing of everything just sucks. I think I handled it well. It was just a s***** situation to be in.”
The first episode of RHORI featured Kelsey sharing the house’s specs during her confessional.
Advertisement
“Living in a 16,000-square-foot home, the house literally has everything that I need. Four kitchens, 79 TVs, the closet — the best part,” she said at the time. “My boyfriend’s family is probably one of the most prominent families in the state of Rhode Island, and he has allowed me to live a life of not being able to work.”
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
During Sunday’s episode, Kelsey broke down in tears while moving out of her ex’s home. She cried, telling costar Liz McGraw that she’s “happy” and “sad” about the situation.
Advertisement
“Leaving this mansion, I am terrified. I lived with my parents until I met my boyfriend. I was 20 and I went straight from my parents house to his house,” Kelsey said in her confessional. “This is the first time where I’m taking that step and, literally, am going to be solo.”
New episodes of The Real Housewives of Rhode Island premiere via Bravo on Sundays at 9 p.m. ET and stream via Peacock the next day.
During the Sunday, May 3, episode of the hit HBO series, Kitty (Anna Van Patten) joined the club after Angel (Priscilla Delgado) disappeared from rehab. She initially was meant to dance for the customers at the strip joint but then a group of four men hired her to join them in a private room.
Kitty was then seen taking ketamine before the men took turns having sex with her. Rue (Zendaya) watched the brutal situation unfold on the cameras in the back. She then tried to offer help to Kitty — even asking if she was forced to work at the club — but the new dancer blew off her concerns.
Things take a turn for the worst when a robbery took place at the club. The manager got shot and Rue ultimately realized that Laurie was to blame. Elsewhere in the episode, Maddy (Alexa Demie) took Cassie (Sydney Sweeney) under her wing, which resulted in her gaining tons of new subscribers on OnlyFans.
Advertisement
Euphoria, which premiered in 2019, originally followed troubled high school student Rue as she struggled to remain sober after rehab. The hit HBO series was quickly renewed for a second season after its premiere, but it took nearly three years for the next batch of episodes to air.
Season 3 was originally set to air on HBO in 2025 before facing several obstacles, including creator Sam Levinson’s commitment to his short-lived series The Idol. The dual WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, which took place in late 2023, also prolonged the delay.
Since season 2 concluded, the cast went through a loss whenAngus Cloud died at age 25 in July 2023 following an accidental overdose. The show is expected to address the fate of his character, Fezco, while Eric Dane‘s Cal made an appearance in the trailer one month after the actor’s death following a battle with ALS. He was 53.
“Some people ask why it took so long between seasons 2 and 3. There were obvious factors — the strikes, trying to make a schedule work with our very in-demand cast, but the real time was in trying to figure out how to find a way to pay respect to those who we lost,” Levinson said in a speech at the season 3 premiere in April 2026.
The Euphoria cast and crew have mourned the deaths of some of their colleagues over the years. Euphoria, which premiered in 2019, originally followed troubled high school student Rue (Zendaya) as she struggled to remain sober after rehab. The hit HBO series was quickly renewed for a second season after its premiere, but it took […]
He continued: “When Angus died, it was tough. I loved him deeply, and I fought hard to keep him clean. The year he died, in 2023, he was one of 73,000 people in America who died of a fentanyl overdose. I learned a whole lot that year, but what I realized more than anything is that death is what gives life meaning. You can’t be arrogant about existence. You’re forced to reckon with the fact that life itself is a wonder, a gift, a profound blessing.”
“There are a lot of scenes where people are either talking to him on the phone,” he told Variety about the decision for Fez to still be part of the story. “I thought that if I couldn’t keep him alive in life then maybe within this show that I can control and keep him alive there. I think the whole thing was to honor him and also I can’t wait for you to see the last few episodes. I think he would be cracking up at his story line. I think he would love it.”
The Met Gala curse has become a popular online theory suggesting that celebrity couples who attend the event together are doomed to break up shortly after. Over the years, several high-profile splits have fueled the speculation, giving the idea a life of its own across social media.
However, the pattern may be more coincidence than curse, as many couples who have walked the Met Gala red carpet together have gone on to stay happily together. Nevertheless, the speculation continues to trend online.
In 2016, The Weeknd, real name Abel Tesfaye, walked the Met Gala red carpet with model Bella Hadid. The couple arrived in matching Givency outfits, with Hadid donning a black strapless gown and The Weeknd wearing an all-black suit with a matching bow tie. Six months after the event, however, they announced their amicable split, citing their busy schedules.
The following year, The Weeknd made his new relationship with Selena Gomez red-carpet official when they attended the Met Gala together and shared a kiss for photographers. The former Disney star wore a blush-colored silk chiffon Coach dress with hand-sewn embroidery. In October that same year, multiple sources confirmed that the couple had broken up.
Advertisement
Jamie Foxx And Katie Holmes Separated Shortly After Attending The Met Gala
It isn’t clear when Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx began dating, but the actress has been spotted with the “Django Unchained” actor as early as 2013. The couple kept an extremely low profile in their romance, with only insiders offering a glimpse into their relationship.
In 2016, an insider said Holmes and Foxx were “very serious” about each other. Papparazzi shots were the only evidence that the two spent time together, often seen holding hands and hugging. In 2018, the two were spotted at a gala in New York, where they sat beside each other and shared laughs the whole night.
They made their first appearance as a couple at the 2019 Met Gala, where Holmes wore a purple Zac Posen gown. Three months later, the couple broke up after six years together.
Kim Kardashian And Pete Davidson Split After Less Than A Year Of Dating
Rumors that Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson started making the rounds after the reality star appeared as a guest on SNL, where she shared the spotlight with the comedian. In a sketch, the two played Aladdin and Jasmine and shared a kiss in a parody of the Disney movie. Later, Kardashian described that the kiss had a “little zing.”
Advertisement
The two were then spotted on several dates and even went on a vacation to the Bahamas. In February 2022, Davidson publicly called Kardashian his “girlfriend” in an interview with PEOPLE. They attended the Met Gala that same year, with the reality star donning the controversial Marilyn Monroe dress. Three months later, they separated, with a source claiming the relationship “ran its course.”
Miley Cyrus And Liam Hemsworth Announced Their Separation Three Months After The Met Gala
Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth’s on-and-off relationship dates back to 2009. The two met on the set of “The Last Song” and sparked a relationship. They broke up and got back together a few times before getting engaged in 2012. In September 2013, however, they called off their engagement and went their separate ways.
Cyrus and Hemsworth sparked dating rumors in January 2016, and a week later, the “Party in the U.S.A.” singer showed off her engagement ring on Instagram. The couple married sometime in December 2018, and they attended the Met Gala the following year. In August 2019, they announced their separation and later filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. Their divorce was finalized in 2020.
Sabrina Carpenter And Barry Keoghan Confirmed Their Split Months After The Met Gala
Dating rumors about Sabrina Carpenter and Barry Keoghan began circulating in late 2023, when they were seen having a “romantic dinner” together. The two made several public appearances together but never outright confirmed their relationship, often avoiding questions about each other or vaguely answering relationship inquiries without naming each other.
Advertisement
In May 2024, Carpenter and Keoghan attended the Met Gala separately but posed for red carpet photos together. The actor portrayed the singer’s love interest in the music video for “Please, Please, Please” the following month, further fueling rumors about their relationship. Eight months after the Met Gala, the two parted ways for good, with a source claiming the relationship “didn’t end well.”
During the Sunday, May 3, episode of the hit CBS series, Kayce (Luke Grimes) saw a fire break out in a barn on his property. He rushed over as Garrett was helping the horses in the stable escape but then things took a turn. Garrett was caught under a beam that fell and he subsequently suffered second degree burns.
The rest of the episode showed Garrett’s loved ones concerned about his health — and his lungs — after a doctor noted that there was internal damage in addition to external. It remains to be seen how much of a health scare Garrett is going through.
Marshals marks Green’s acting debut — with him appearing in multiple episodes this season.
Yellowstone‘s Marshals spinoff has already featured guest appearances from country stars — but who does musician Riley Green play? During the Sunday, March 8, episode of the Yellowstone spinoff, Cal (Logan Marshall-Green) and Andrea (Ash Santos) shared a drink at the local bar — the Four Sixes — country singer Ashley Cooke performed her song […]
“I’m so excited to be joining the cast of Marshals. Being on set with my buddy Luke Grimes made the experience even more memorable,” Green said in a statement in February. “This is my first go around in the acting space and I couldn’t have asked for a better introduction to this world.”
Advertisement
Green plays former Navy SEAL Garrett, who arrives at the ranch hoping to lean on his friends Kayce Dutton and Cal to help “put the demons of his past to rest,” according to the official character description.
Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images for CBS
“It happened really organically. It was through Luke Grimes, who’s become a real good buddy of mine,” Green told People in April about how his role on the show came to be. “He’s starting his music career and was starting to come to Nashville and doing some cowriting and stuff. I was trying to help him out in that world a little bit with some people that I knew. He was like, ‘Man, you should try acting, you know? I think you’d be good at it.’ I was already kind of putting thought into that.”
Green recalled everyone being “so welcoming” to him on set as he balanced acting and performing.
“A lot of my music career, other than writing new songs and adding things to a set, there’s a lot of monotony of playing the same songs over and over again, showing in and out during a tour,” he shared. “This is something that’s brand new every day.”
After meeting with an acting coach, Green was taught not to “worry so much about the lines” and instead focus on responding “to what the other person says.” Green also teased how his character has “a lot of vulnerability,” in addition to his extensive military experience.
Advertisement
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
“He’d been through a lot and had a lot of problems and that’s not the easiest thing to just jump into,” Green noted. “I certainly think there would have been characters that would have been easier for me to sort of tap into that were more similar to me.”
He continued: “This guy was somebody that really had a lot of deep emotional problems from things that had happened to him in the past. And when you haven’t lived those, you really kind of just rely on feedback from other people in the room.”
Each year, the annual Met Gala encourages Hollywood’s finest to make an unforgettable appearance that coincides with the theme of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute.
From “Camp: Notes on Fashion” in 2019 to “Punk: Chaos to Couture” in 2013, stars bring their A-game to the fundraiser.
Outrageous looks have almost become an essential part of the stylish night. With the imaginations of fashion’s most creative designers behind them, stars have sported everything from backless chaps to pope attire.
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
The “China: Through the Looking Glass” collection in 2015 brought forth some seriously wild looks. Sarah Jessica Parker arrived in a Philip Treacy headpiece that featured a mohawk and a custom H&M dress that she helped design.Rihanna turned heads in a bright yellow Guo Pei Couture number that had a train over eight feet long. And you could hardly see Solange Knowles’ head peeking out of her structured Giles dress.
Possibly the funkiest theme of all was 2019’s “Camp: Notes on Fashion.”Katy Perry made headlines for wearing a Jeremy Scott ensemble featuring a 3-D chandelier that even lit up. From Tiffany Haddish’s Michael Kors sparkly suit to Cardi B‘s Thom Browne mattress dress, it’s nearly impossible to narrow down the wild looks.
These are just a few of the wacky and cool outfits that have stood out through the years. But to see all the wildest, greatest and completely absurd looks to grace the Met Gala red carpet, keep scrolling.
If you’re of a certain age, there’s a very good chance you’ve read William Golding‘s classic 1954 novel Lord of the Flies, which has been required reading in many schools. The book, about a group of young boys stranded on an island after a plane crash, has inspired many other works since, including Showtime’s Yellowjackets. It’s also been adapted a few times on screen, most notably via films in 1963 and 1990. Now, Lord of the Flies is back as a four-part miniseries set to premiere on Netflix in the U.S., and if you’ve read the book, you know what to expect. Not content to simply let things play out exactly as they do in the novel, though, creator Jack Thorne (Adolescence) and director Marc Munden (The Secret Garden) take some creative risks that don’t always work.
What Is ‘Lord of the Flies’ About?
The first thing this new version of Lord of the Flies does right is that it doesn’t give in to temptation and update the source material for the modern age. The miniseries isn’t set in the 21st century, with whiny kids missing their cellphones. The BBC is involved, which means it’s not Americanized either. Lord of the Flies isn’t interested in slowly establishing the characters before hitting viewers with the inciting incident. From the first scene, the plane crash has already happened, with the focus on a survivor lying in the muck.
Each of the miniseries’ four episodes revolves around a different major character. The premiere revolves around Piggy (David McKenna), a short kid with asthma and the smarts to lead everyone, if only the others would listen. In the second episode, the plot shifts to Jack (Lox Pratt), the angry blonde kid and head of the boys’ choir, who quickly assumes leadership of the hunters. Episode 3 belongs to Simon (Ike Talbut), a boy torn between two sides and mentally breaking down, while the finale centers on Ralph (Winston Sawyer) as he struggles to hold on to his role as chief.
Advertisement
This approach allows for an understanding of how different personalities adjust to being stranded when they’re much too young to process the situation. Some rise to lead, while others crumble and let selfish desires take over. Piggy is the brains of the group, but isn’t respected because of his appearance. Increasingly, it’s him and Ralph against the insanity spreading in Jack’s group. How many of them will make it out alive?
‘Lord of the Flies’ Doesn’t Try to Modernize the Story
How do you add something new to such a well-known story, especially when the choice has been made not to modernize it? In some respects, you don’t. Munden and Thorne seem to recognize this and allow this tale to mostly play out as is, since throwing in too many ideas would cut a classic off at the knees.Golding’s story stands on its own, and its powerful themes about societal breakdown remain timely today.
Still, this Lord of the Flies adaptation is more than a simple, straightforward retelling; it’s a work of art. Munden contributes an impressive cinematic flair that becomes its own character at points. Shots twist or go fuzzy in the chaos. Colors brighten or become more saturated when one character starts to fall apart. When the group of survivors is being introduced, the camera often finds them, one by one, in uncomfortable close-ups on numb faces, like end-of-the-world school photos.
The score, created in part by the iconic Hans Zimmer, has the same unnerving personality. It’s never too aggressive, but it doesn’t allow the viewer to relax either. It begins with simple woodwinds and strings, putting the audience in the story’s era, before becoming more frantic, reaching a crescendo of horror in later episodes. These artistic touches are a treat for the eyes and ears, but they also feel a bit too overwrought at times, mostly as a consequence of the overall series length.
‘Lord of the Flies’ Phenomenal Young Cast Keeps the Miniseries Afloat
Piggy (David McKenna) lying on the ground in ‘Lord of the Flies’Image via Netflix
Advertisement
Golding’s novel is just 224 pages long, which means that Lord of the Flies works perfectly as a two-hour film. As a four-hour miniseries, the story is strained midway through, with repetitive scenes and meandering shots leading up to bigger moments. There’s one crucial scene where the new adaptation goes in a direction it should’ve avoided. Rather than being sudden and terrifying, it’s drawn out too long, with prolonged goodbyes that diminish the immediate shock of the original moment, removing the pain of immediacy where things can go to hell in an instant. It’s the only time when the miniseries makes a misstep, becoming too modernized after rejecting it elsewhere.
Thankfully, this divergence can be somewhat forgiven due to the young cast’s phenomenal performances. Talbut’s wide eyes convey Simon’s breakdown, while Sawyer displays the calm and steadiness that make Ralph a chosen chief. Yet Lord of the Flies is especially buoyed by two cast members. Lox Pratt’s Jack is awful in the best way possible. He’s a horrible jerk, a selfish kid who deserves the worst, yet he’s also shown to be scared and weak when he’s not showing off. It’s easy to see why Pratt was cast as Draco Malfoy in the new Harry Potter TV series. McKenna’s Piggy is the tragic heart of Lord of the Flies, and the miniseries is at its best every time it finds him. The character is wise beyond his years, a lonely soul forced to grow up all too young, all conveyed without the necessity of dialogue.
Another adaptation of Lord of the Flies arguably isn’t necessary, especially if you’re already familiar with the story, but this new interpretation is a solid way in for the uninitiated. Its cinematic style is effective, and its performances are outstanding. If its four episodes had been a bit shorter, and a few changes to the source material had been reversed, Lord of the Flies could have achieved greatness; instead, it settles for being pretty good.
Lord of the Flies is now streaming on Netflix.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Release Date
2026 – 2026-00-00
Advertisement
Network
BBC One
Advertisement
Directors
Marc Munden
Writers
Advertisement
Jack Thorne
Advertisement
Cast
David McKenna
Advertisement
Nicholas (Piggy)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Pros & Cons
The plot stays in its era and isn’t modernized.
Marc Munden adds an unnerving cinematic flare to many shots.
The score, made in part by Hans Zimmer, becomes chilling when needed.
The performances, especially from David McKenna and Lox Pratt, are superb.
The episodes are a little too long, causing the story to drag in the middle.
One death scene is altered and too drawn-out, thus lessening the impact.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login