Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Entertainment

10 Thriller Movies That Are Amazing From Start to Finish

Published

on

A scared-looking man driving a car in Blue Ruin

A great thriller does not just keep you engaged. That phrase is too weak for what the best ones do. The best thrillers invade your nervous system. They make your shoulders tighten without permission. They make ordinary objects feel loaded. A hallway becomes a threat. A phone call becomes a trap. That is what this list is about.

Not thrillers with one amazing sequence and a soggy middle. Not thrillers that coast on premise. Not thrillers you respect more than you feel. I mean movies that lock in early and never lose the line. Movies that know exactly when to push, when to withhold, when to mislead, when to let a performance take over the room, and when to stop before one twist too many turns electricity into a gimmick. These are the ones that do not ask for patience. They command it. And because this list is about thrillers, I do not care only about plot. I care about pressure. These ten absolutely understand that.

Advertisement

10

‘Blue Ruin’ (2013)

A scared-looking man driving a car in Blue Ruin
Macon Blair in Blue Ruin
Image via RADiUS-TWC

So many revenge thrillers pretend they are showing cost while secretly making vengeance look like an underground superpower. This movie does not do that for a second. What wrecks me about Blue Ruin is how little glamour it allows revenge. It shows revenge as clumsy, sad, badly planned, emotionally unhealed behavior carried out by a man who looks like life has already taken too much out of him before the blood really starts flowing. Dwight (Macon Blair) is one of the most quietly devastating thriller protagonists of the last decade because he does not enter the movie with mythic force. He feels fragile from the beginning. Not weak, fragile.

That is why the suspense works so well. Every move feels like it could go wrong because Dwight feels like someone who would absolutely be capable of getting in over his head. The violence lands harder because it is ugly, awkward, panicked. The emotional force comes from knowing the movie is not building toward triumph. It is building toward damage spreading. Blue Ruin is amazing because it knows a thriller can be intimate, brutal, and deeply mournful at the same time.

Advertisement

9

‘Prisoners’ (2013)

Keller (Hugh Jackman) pins down Alex (Paul Dano) on the hood of a car in 'Prisoners'.
Keller (Hugh Jackman) pins down Alex (Paul Dano) in ‘Prisoners’.
Image via Warner Bros.

This movie feels like grief dragging itself through rain and concrete. From the first disappearance, Prisoners does not simply become tense. It becomes morally contaminated. It understands that a thriller about missing children cannot just be gripping. It has to feel like something sacred has been ripped out of the world, and every scene afterward has to live in the shadow of that rupture. The film follows Keller Dover (Hugh Jackman), a man whose entire identity is built on preparedness, protection, control, and moral certainty, and the film slowly forces all of that into a furnace instead of just making him a desperate father.

He’s like Liam Neeson in Taken. He is loving and terrifying in the same body. You understand him even when you start fearing what he is becoming. That is the kind of character work thrillers often skip in favor of momentum. This film doubles down on it. Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) is one of my favorite thriller investigators because he feels haunted before the case even solves anything. And that is why the film is so effective from start to finish.

Advertisement

8

‘The Fugitive’ (1993)

Harrison Ford as Dr. Kimble in The Fugitive 
Harrison Ford as Dr. Kimble in The Fugitive 
Image via Warner Bros. 

There is something almost holy about how cleanly The Fugitive moves. It does not waste time, and yet it never feels rushed. It understands that one of the purest pleasures in thrillers is watching intelligence operate under pressure. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford)’s character is smart, resourceful, and driven, but the movie never lets him float into action-star invincibility. He looks tired. Cornered. Furious in a way that keeps having to stay practical. That practicality is the whole magic of the film.

Then Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones) shows up and turns the whole film into a duel of professional energies. He is sharp, dry, relentless, and fully alive in his own movie. The brilliance is that The Fugitive does not need the marshals to be stupid or corrupt to make Kimble sympathetic. Both sides have competence. That creates momentum with actual teeth. And that’s why it holds all the way through. It is one of those thrillers where every scene either traps, frees, or redirects the protagonist without ever feeling mechanical. The movie trusts velocity, but it earns it through character.

Advertisement

7

‘Gone Girl’ (2014)

Rosamund Pike smiling gently in Gone Girl Image via 20th Century Studios

This is one of the nastiest American thrillers of the century, and I mean that lovingly. Gone Girl is amazing because it understands that marriage, performance, gender expectations, and media spectacle are already full of thriller energy before anyone starts disappearing. What makes the film sing is how cruelly precise it is about surfaces. Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck) and Amy Dunne (Rosamund Pike) are spouses in crisis. They are image managers, fantasy collaborators, mutual disappointments, and eventually each other’s most intimate enemies.

Affleck is perfect casting because his natural ambiguity becomes part of the movie’s design. He can look guilty, blank, aggrieved, stupid, and sincerely blindsided in the same scene. Pike, meanwhile, gives one of the great ice-blooded thriller performances. But the genius is that Amy is not merely a monster of intelligence. She is also a creature of humiliation, ego, theatricality, and rage. The performance works because she is horrifyingly alive. And once the film pivots, it never lets up. Every media beat, every false note of sympathy, every recalibration of power inside the relationship feels like poison becoming more concentrated. This is a thriller that keeps asking: what if the performance is the prison? What if winning means staying in the lie forever? That is such an ugly question, and the movie squeezes it until it sings.

Advertisement

6

‘No Country for Old Men’ (2007)

Josh Brolin as Llewelyn Moss with a gun on his back in the desert in No Country for Old Men.
Josh Brolin as Llewelyn Moss in No Country for Old Men.
Image via Miramax Films

This film scares me in a way very few thrillers do because it does not behave like it owes you moral structure. It gives you money, pursuit, law, evil, and survival, and then steadily strips away the comforting idea that any of those things will arrange themselves into a shape you recognize. That is why the movie feels so cold. Not because it lacks feeling, but because it refuses false reassurance. Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) is one of the smartest characters in any thriller on this list.

And then there is Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem), who is terrifying precisely because Bardem never pushes him into flamboyant villain theater. But what deepens the film beyond pure dread is Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones). Bell is the soul of the movie. He can name the fatigue that comes from living long enough to realize the world no longer fits the moral equipment you brought into it. That sadness hangs over everything in this film.

Advertisement

5

‘Zodiac’ (2007)

Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) hunchesover his desk while Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr.) loiters casually behind him in 'Zodiac' (2007).
Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) hunchesover his desk while Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr.) loiters casually behind him in ‘Zodiac’ (2007).
Image via Paramount Pictures

There are thrillers about catching a killer, and then there is Zodiac, which understands that obsession can become the real killer long before the case closes. This is one of the most hypnotic procedural thrillers ever made because it treats uncertainty not as a narrative inconvenience but as the whole emotional catastrophe. The killer is terrifying, yes. The inability to turn fragments into finality is even worse.

What makes the film so special is the way it keeps changing who the emotional center belongs to without ever losing pressure. Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) becomes the most obvious vessel for obsession, but the movie has already seeped into everybody long before he fully takes over. Dave Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) carries the fatigue of professionalism under absurd pressure. Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr.) has all that wit and velocity curdling into corrosion. The whole film feels like talented men being slowly unstitched by the refusal of reality to become solvable. And the suspense is extraordinary. Hardly anything happens in the conventional sense, and your body still forgets how to relax.

Advertisement

4

‘Oldboy’ (2003)

Yoo Ji-tae with a gun pointed at his head in 'Oldboy' Image via FilmDistrict

Oldboy does not unfold. It stalks, taunts, humiliates, and detonates. Park Chan-wook makes the entire film feel like a revenge mechanism built by a sadist with a poet’s eye and a grudge against ordinary storytelling. It is operatic, ugly, stylish, sick, and emotionally ruinous in a way very few thrillers dare to be. What gives it its force is Oh Dae-su (Choi Min-sik) himself. Choi Min-sik plays him with such wounded animal intensity that the movie never becomes just a formal stunt. He is funny, pathetic, enraged, degraded, determined, and increasingly shattered as the truth tightens around him. You feel how imprisonment has curdled him. You feel how revenge gives him direction without giving him dignity back. That emotional degradation is crucial.

The film’s most disturbing revelations land because they do not just surprise him. They annihilate the parts of him that were still trying to remain human. And yes, the corridor hammer fight is iconic for a reason, but what makes the movie great is that its violence is not there merely to excite. Every blow feels like part of a larger moral architecture of punishment. By the end, Oldboy has become one of the bleakest thrillers ever made about what vengeance really wants: not balance, not justice, but total psychic occupation. It is relentless, and I love it for that.

Advertisement

3

‘The Silence of the Lambs’ (1991)

Scott Glenn wears a jacket and thin gold glasses in an image from 'The Silence of the Lambs'
Scott Glenn wears a jacket and thin gold glasses in an image from ‘The Silence of the Lambs’
Image via Orion Pictures

This movie is so completely in control of its own dread that revisiting it almost feels like revisiting a sacred object. The Silence of the Lambs is not just suspenseful. It is intimate with fear. It understands that terror gets worse when it is forced into conversation, when politeness and appetite share a room, when intelligence becomes a form of predation. Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) is the heart of the film, and the reason it never becomes merely a serial-killer showcase.

And then there is Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins). What more can even be said at this point except that Hopkins somehow makes stillness feel carnivorous? The scenes between him and Clarice are iconic to this date because he sees too much, speaks too precisely, and turns language into touch. The film is amazing from start to finish because every scene either deepens Clarice or sharpens the shape of evil around her. Nothing is wasted. Not a glance. Not a pause.

Advertisement

2

‘Se7en’ (1995)

A close-up of Detective Mills (Brad Pitt) crying while holding a gun in Se7en.
A close-up of Detective Mills (Brad Pitt) crying while holding a gun in Se7en.
Image via New Line Cinema

Another David Fincher addition to this list. And while some thrillers feel dark, Se7en feels damned. From the opening credits onward, the movie behaves as if the city has already surrendered to rot and the investigation is simply forcing two men to walk through the smell of it. This is one of the best character pairings in thriller history. Somerset (Morgan Freeman) and Mills (Brad Pitt) give the movie its weight in a way that any lesser actor might not have been able to. They are rival ways of surviving a world that seems spiritually diseased. Freeman gives Somerset a tired precision that kills me every time. Pitt, meanwhile, makes Mills hot-blooded enough to be reckless and sincere enough to be tragic. The movie needs both energies. Without Mills’ emotional impatience, the film becomes all despair. Without Somerset’s old grief, it loses its depth.

And then the murders. What makes them horrifying is not only their invention, but the way the movie turns each crime scene into a moral atmosphere. It makes you enter philosophies of punishment. The apartment of Sloth. The library nights. The long drives. The rain. The way John Doe’s (Kevin Spacey) logic keeps pressing inward until the film stops feeling like a manhunt and starts feeling like an argument with God.

Advertisement

1

‘Heat’ (1995)

Al Pacino holding a rifle in 'Heat'
Al Pacino holding a rifle in ‘Heat’
Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

I love Heat with the kind of intensity that makes me want to defend it before anyone has even criticized it. This is not just one of the greatest thrillers ever made. It is one of the most complete. It has scale without bloat, character without softness, action without stupidity, and melancholy running through it like a private current. It is a thriller about professionals, yes, but what makes it immortal is that it is also about loneliness becoming a life philosophy. Firstly, its star-studded cast is unmatched. Neil McCauley (Robert De Niro) is one of the greatest movie criminals. Vincent Hanna (Al Pacino) is on the other side of the same wound.

Both these men know what the other has sacrificed to become this exact kind of person. And that is why Heat is number one. Not just because the bank robbery and shootout are still among the greatest action sequences ever filmed, though they are. Not just because Michael Mann directs cities better than most people direct actors, though he does. It is number one because it circles its characters again and again until the suspense becomes emotional, existential. That final airport runway sequence destroys me every time. Two men stripped of all the noise, all the systems, all the teams, all the urban architecture, just one chasing, one fleeing, both having followed their own nature all the way to its end. When that hand reaches out in the dark, Heat becomes more than a thriller. It becomes a tragedy that happened to carry a gun. And that, to me, is perfection.













Advertisement



















































Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

Advertisement

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement


heat-movie-poster.jpg
Advertisement


Heat

Advertisement


Release Date

December 15, 1995

Runtime
Advertisement

170 minutes

Director

Michael Mann

Advertisement

Writers

Michael Mann

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

Sarah Paulson Praises Amanda Peet’s ‘Profound’ Cancer Essay

Published

on

Sarah Paulson is in awe of how her longtime friend Amanda Peet summarized her recent cancer battle.

“My best friend, Amanda Peet … has written the most profoundly gorgeous essay about the loss of her parents, while dealing with a breast cancer diagnosis,” Paulson, 51, wrote via Instagram on Saturday, March 21. “@newyorkermag has published it today, and I’m screaming from the rooftops with joy. I hope you all take the time to read it.”

She continued, “If you are running around and doing other stuff, I did the audio recording and you can listen to me try to do the piece justice. My friend is a @newyorkermag essayist. How outrageously groovy is that? Bird, I love you beyond.”

Paulson subsequently inspired a number of her other famous friends to read Peet’s story.

Advertisement
Amanda-Peet-GettyImages-2259753815


Related: Amanda Peet Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis Amid Parents’ Hospice Care

Amanda Peet has been diagnosed with breast cancer. “For many years, I’ve been told that I have ‘dense’ and ‘busy’ breasts — not as a compliment but as a warning that they require extra monitoring,” Peet wrote in a New Yorker essay published Saturday, March 21, revealing she was diagnosed “last fall.” “I had been […]

“Going to read now!!” Naomi Watts wrote in the comments section, while Rose Byrne revealed that she already “read [the essay] this morning” and found the prose to be “so extraordinary.”

Advertisement

Ali Wentworth, for her part, added, “It’s a beautifully written piece. All too familiar. Give Amanda a huge hug for me!”

In her essay, Peet, 54, revealed that she was diagnosed with stage I breast cancer “last fall” while both her parents were in hospice care.

“For many years, I’ve been told that I have ‘dense’ and ‘busy’ breasts — not as a compliment but as a warning that they require extra monitoring,” the Your Friends and Neighbors star wrote. “I had been seeing a breast surgeon every six months for checkups. The Friday before Labor Day, I went for what I thought would be a routine scan.”

Peet’s physician subsequently told her that she “didn’t like the way something looked on the ultrasound” and requested that the actress undergo a biopsy. Two tumors, one of which was benign, were visible on one breast.

Advertisement
Stars Who Beat Breast Cancer Julia Louis-Dreyfus Cynthia Nixon and More p


Related: Stars Who Beat Breast Cancer: Linda Evangelista, Cynthia Nixon and More

Advertisement

Many celebrities have spoken out about their personal battles with breast cancer over the years. Julia Louis-Dreyfus went public with her breast cancer diagnosis in September 2017 via Instagram. Nearly one year later, she had successfully beaten the illness and returned to work on Veep. “It sounds kind of corny, but there’s something about after […]

As Peet waited to find out what type of cancer she had, her parents were on their death beds.

“Our parents, long divorced, were both in hospice, on opposite coasts,” Peet recalled to the outlet, also referring to her sister. “Our mother’s had started in June, but our father’s was only a week in, so we hadn’t expected him to go first. I flew to New York. I didn’t make it before my father took his last breath, but I got to see his body before it was taken from his apartment.”

Peet returned home to Los Angeles, where she learned that her cancer was “hormone-receptor-positive” and “HER2-negative.” She received her first “clear scan” shortly before her mom’s death in January.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Buffy’ Stars Celebrate Nicholas Brendon’s Legacy

Published

on

Nicholas Brendon at 'Date Movie' KROQ Screening Feb 13, 2006

Actor Nicholas Brendon, who is best known for playing Xander Harris on all seven seasons of the original “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” series. According to a statement released by his family, the actor passed away from natural causes at the age of 54. He had been plagued by health issues in recent years, including a cardiac incident in 2022.

Nicholas Brendon’s Family Asks For Privacy After His Passing

Nicholas Brendon at 'Date Movie' KROQ Screening Feb 13, 2006
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

On Friday, March 20, the late actor’s family confirmed his passing in a brief statement shared with The Hollywood Reporter.

“We are heartbroken to share the passing of our brother and son, Nicholas Brendon. He passed in his sleep of natural causes,” they wrote in a brief statement, going on to say: “Nicky loved to share his enthusiastic talent with his family, friends and fans. He was passionate, sensitive, and endlessly driven to create. Those who truly knew him understood that his art was one of the purest reflections of who he was.”

“While it’s no secret that Nicholas had struggles in the past, he was on medications and treatment to manage his diagnosis and he was optimistic about the future at the time of his passing,” they continued. “Our family asks for privacy during this time as we grieve his loss and celebrate the life of a man who lived with intensity, imagination, and heart.”

Advertisement

In the hours after the news broke, his “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” costars took to social media to pay tribute.

Sarah Michelle Gellar Mourns Nicholas Brendon’s Death With Poignant ‘Buffy’ Quote

Actress Sarah Michelle Gellar, who played the titular Buffy Summers, took to Instagram to pay tribute to her late costar with a quote that Xander said during the show’s seventh and final season.

“They’ll never know how tough it is to be the one who isn’t chosen. To live so near to the spotlight, and never step in it. But I know. I see more than anybody realizes, because nobody’s watching me,” she quoted.

“I saw you Nicky,” she added. “I know you are at peace, in that big rocking chair in the sky.”

Alyson Hannigan Also Pays Tribute With A ‘Buffy’ Photo

Similarly, Alyson Hannigan, who played the witchy Willow, took to Instagram to share a screenshot of Xander holding a crying Willow during one of the show’s most emotional episodes.

“My Sweet Nicky, thank you for years of laughter, love and Dodgers. I will think of you every time I see a rocking chair.  I love you. RIP,” she wrote alongside the photo.

Advertisement

David Boreanaz Also Pays Tribute To Nicholas Brendon

Actor David Boreanaz played the vampire Angel during the early seasons of “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” before moving to his own spin-off show, “Angel.”

In a lengthy caption, the “Bones” actor began by writing, “There are people you work with
and then there are people you share time with. Nick was the latter.”

He praised Nicholas Brendon as someone who “carried something real,” even though he wasn’t “perfect” or “polished” and noted how, in the entertainment industry, “that matters more than most things.”

“We don’t always get to choose how long someone stays in the story, only that they were here,” he wrote, concluding, “Some people leave a mark without trying.”

More ‘Buffy The Vampire Slayer’ Costars Pay Tribute

Emma Caulfield Ford, who played the demon turned Xander’s love interest, Anya Jenkins, took to her Instagram Stories to share a clip of the late actor giving an interview about the show’s final season.

In a text box placed over the photo, she wrote, “My heart is so heavy. I can’t put into words just yet how this has hit me.” She shared a clip of Brendon on the series, adding, “Let this clip of us giving it our all be a place holder. Rest Nicky. Rest. I love you.”

Advertisement

Charisma Carpenter, who played Cordelia Chase, a love interest of Xander on “Buffy” before moving over to “Angel,” also took to Instagram to share her condolences in a lengthy tribute.

“I will miss the version of the man I once knew – someone who was so warm and loving. He was cuddly, funny, silly, self-deprecating, and supremely talented. I loved every scene we had together back in the day. He always kept me on my toes, never delivering a line the same way twice, forcing me to become a better actor by listening,” she wrote alongside a carousel of photos of the two together.

“I will always remember him in my mind’s eye, in his trailer with the door wide open, in his rocking chair, smoking a cigarette and listening to music. From his trailer, which my window faced on the lot, I could hear all the bands that exemplify the 90s but are also, for me, tied up in the memory of Nicky,” she continued, listing bands like Creed, Alice in Chains, Green Day, and Nirvana.

“I miss those days and cling to those memories of him today. I offer my condolences to his family, his closest friends – who were with him to the end – and to the fans around the world who found comfort in his work,” she continued, adding, “May he be at peace now.”

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Chuck Norris' final film is Vanilla Ice's upcoming “Zombie Plane”

Published

on


The late action hero will appear in the Australian action-comedy.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

7 Crime Shows That Have Aged Like Milk

Published

on

Jack Bauer pointing a gun in the Fox series '24'

We’ve all been in this situation before. You curl up on the coach, teeing up your favorite streaming service for a night of binging one of the classic crime shows from a bygone era. You settle in, popcorn and wine on deck, and press play, ready for a night of reliving nostalgia. Then, 30 minutes into the series, you begin to realize that the protagonist of your “classic” crime show is basically a walking HR nightmare, and you go searching for something that will be easier to watch.

This is the unfortunate fate of some of the shows that were once destined to become classics. Shows that once felt edgy and gritty now feel dated and problematic, according to today’s standards. Whether it’s the glorification of “cowboy” policing, or true-crime documentaries that feel more exploitative than groundbreaking, these crime shows didn’t age like a fine wine from Napa, but more like sour milk that sat on the porch for a week with the sun beaming down on it. So, let’s look at the shows that prove that “law and order” can sometimes become stale.

Advertisement

’24’ (2001–2014)

Jack Bauer pointing a gun in the Fox series '24'
Jack Bauer pointing a gun in the Fox series ’24’
Image via FOX

In the 2000s, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland) was the man that protected America from the terrorists. Created by Joel Surnow and Robert Cochran, 24 premiered two months after the terrorist attacks of September 11th, and the show ushered in a new age for crime shows as it moved away from the “crime-of-the-week” formula in exchange for high-concept television that was high-stakes, and provided high-drama. Each season of 24 focused on a single day in which Bauer and the FBI must investigate and stop a terrorist attack on the homeland. Back in the 2000s, this was an exciting and genre-bending premise; however, the veneer of 24 has dulled greatly in recent years.

For starters, while 24 focused on terrorism as its central plot, it was often accused of glorifying torture and illegal government surveillance, the latter of which became an issue in real life with the public as the War on Terror dragged on. 24 is also not fondly looked on for the way it portrayed Muslim characters, often stereotyping them as terrorists, along with the fact that the series ran too long. After the fifth season, the quality of the show dropped substantially as its terrorist-heavy, post-9/11 themes began to grow stale among an audience that was clamoring for something fresher. While older viewers may still look at 24 as a groundbreaking series, to those who grew up after its peak, and even those who were around during its original run, its themes and tropes have certainly aged like curdled milk.

Advertisement

‘Cops’ (1989–Present)

Police officers in Cops
Police officers in Cops
Image via FOX

After the murder of George Floyd in the Summer of 2020, Americans began to re-think what they thought of law enforcement, both in how they interact with the public, and how they’re portrayed on television. This reckoning is what led to the cancellation of Cops, a longtime fixture of Saturday nights on Fox that was the vanguard of the reality TV genre. Born out of the writer’s strike of 1989, Cops became a hit among audiences with its portrayal of cops as they busted the bad guys and served their communities. The show blew open the notion that Saturday nights was a “death spot” in the TV lineup, and the action on the screen was often exciting.

But looking at the show from a modern lens, Cops was a very problematic show in which its high ratings help hide its poorly aged concepts. A large portion of the people profiled on the show were often people of color, who were highlighted as criminals who were the scourge of society. Cops also normalized police brutality, as the show framed violent arrests and the harsh treatment of suspects as justified, a thinking that changed dramatically after the death of numerous African American individuals at the hands of the police. While Cops was truly groundbreaking, kicking off the reality TV format that would only grow in subsequent years, Cops is nothing more than police propaganda in the face of other reality shows such as On Patrol Live, a similar show that shows police in real-time and gives a more honest look at policing.

Advertisement

‘Walker, Texas Ranger’ (1993–2001)

Chuck Norris as Cordell Walker, in uniform in 'Walker, Texas Ranger.'
Chuck Norris as Cordell Walker, in uniform in ‘Walker, Texas Ranger.’
Image via CBS

This one hurts, as this author is a huge fan of Walker, Texas Ranger, and remains so to this day. However, while I’m still a huge fan of this crime procedural, even I can’t help but notice how poorly the show has aged. Inspired by the 1983 film Lone Wolf McQuade, the crime drama stars Chuck Norris as Cordell Walker, a member of the Texas Ranger who, along with his partner, James “Jimmy” Trivette (Clarence Gilyard), help solve crimes and bring criminals to justice in the Rangers’ Dallas-Fort Worth division. Airing in syndication, Walker, Texas Ranger became a hit among viewers during its initial run, and has maintained its popularity in the years after it left first-run status in 2001.

Having said that, there are a number of issues that have made this show age poorly. For starters, Walker, Texas Ranger feels very predictable, thanks to its “attack first, ask questions later” format that it followed with religion, with Cordell being portrayed as a “Super Ranger” with near impossible immunity to physical harm, even though he inflicted a lot of harm on criminals. Then there’s the production quality, which looked a bit campy even during its original run, but it’s even more obvious today. In many of the action scenes, you can clearly see Norris’ stunt double, and the many mistakes that are made, such as clearly-damaged cars repairing themselves in between scenes. While many longtime viewers could possibly get past those examples, what modern viewers can’t get past is how the show clearly justifies excessive policing, to the point that some viewers now view Walker, Texas Ranger as a “conservative law enforcement fantasy” that has aged the show quite poorly according to today’s standards.

Advertisement

‘CSI: Crime Scene Investigation’ (2000–2015)

Laurence Fishburne CSI Season 9
Laurence Fishburne as Dr. Raymond Langston in ‘CSI: Crime Scene Investigation’
Image via CBS

Back at the turn of the millennium, TV viewers were becoming increasingly interested in forensic science, especially when it came to solving cases. This was thanks to CBS’ highly stylistic crime procedural CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, a show that would go on to launch an entire franchise that would become the bedrock of the network’s crime procedural programming. The original CSI premiered in 2000, and took a different take on the typical crime series, focusing on a team of crime scene investigators who use physical evidence and forensic science to solve murders in Las Vegas. The science the CSI team used was high-tech and looked cool to viewers, with the show having an outsized effect on the real world use of forensic evidence.

The downside, now, is that a lot of what was portrayed in the original CSI was very inaccurate. The show drastically exaggerated the capabilities of forensic technicians, making them look like detectives when, in reality, they’re not. As aforementioned, the “CSI Effect” wound up having a negative impact on the judicial system in real life, with juries often demanding excessive forensic evidence for convictions, which was impossible to do. This was corrected in later versions of the franchise, but they couldn’t fix the tone and style of the original CSI, with its highly stylized nature aging the show rapidly in subsequent years.













Advertisement



















































Collider Exclusive · TV Medicine Quiz
Which Fictional Hospital
Would You Work Best In?

The Pitt · ER · Grey’s Anatomy · House · Scrubs
Advertisement

Five hospitals. Five completely different ways medicine goes sideways on television — brutal, chaotic, romantic, brilliant, and ridiculous. Only one of them is the ward your instincts were built for. Ten questions will figure out exactly where you belong.

🚨The Pitt

🏥ER

💉Grey’s Anatomy

🔬House

Advertisement

🩺Scrubs

Advertisement

01

A critical patient comes through the door. What’s your first instinct?
Medicine under pressure reveals who you actually are.





Advertisement

02

Why did you go into medicine in the first place?
The honest answer says more about you than the one you’d give in an interview.





Advertisement

03

What do you actually want from the people you work with?
Who you want beside you under pressure is who you are.





Advertisement

04

How do you actually perform under extreme pressure?
The worst shifts reveal things about you that the good ones never will.





Advertisement

05

You lose a patient you fought hard to save. How do you carry it?
Every doctor who’s worked a long shift has had to answer this question.





Advertisement

06

How would your colleagues describe the way you work?
Your reputation on the floor is usually more accurate than your self-image.





Advertisement

07

How do you feel about hospital protocol and procedure?
Every institution has rules. What you do with them is a choice.





Advertisement

08

What kind of medical work do you find most compelling?
What draws your attention when you walk through those doors matters.





Advertisement

09

What does this job cost you personally?
Nobody works in medicine without paying a price. What’s yours?





Advertisement

10

At the end of a long shift, what keeps you coming back?
The answer to this question is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement
Your Assignment Has Been Made
You Belong In…

Your answers have pointed to one fictional hospital above all others. This is the ward your instincts, your temperament, and your particular brand of dysfunction were built for.

Advertisement

The Pitt

You are built for the most unsparing version of emergency medicine television has ever shown. The Pitt doesn’t romanticise the work — it puts you inside a single fifteen-hour shift and doesn’t let you look away. You are someone who needs their work to be real, who finds meaning not in the drama surrounding medicine but in medicine itself, and who has made peace with the fact that this job will take from you constantly and give back in ways that are harder to name. You don’t need the chaos to be aestheticised. You need it to be honest. Pittsburgh Trauma Medical Center is exactly that — and you would not want to be anywhere else.

Advertisement

ER

You are the person who keeps the whole floor running — not the most brilliant in the room, but possibly the most essential. County General is built on the shoulders of people who show up, do the work, absorb the losses, and come back the next day without requiring the job to be anything other than what it is. You care deeply about patients as individual human beings, you believe in the system even when it fails you, and you understand that emergency medicine at its core is about holding the line between order and chaos for just long enough. ER is television about endurance, and you have it.

Advertisement

Grey’s Anatomy

You came to medicine with your whole self — your ambition, your emotions, your relationships, your history — and you have never quite managed to leave any of it at the door. Grey Sloan is a hospital where the personal and the professional are permanently, chaotically entangled, and where that entanglement produces both the greatest disasters and the most remarkable saves. You are someone who feels things fully, who forms deep attachments to the people you work with, and who understands that the most extraordinary medicine often happens at the intersection of clinical skill and profound human connection. It’s messy here. You would not have it any other way.

Advertisement

House

You are drawn to the problem above everything else. Not the patient as a person — though you are capable of caring, even if you’d deny it — but the case as a puzzle, the symptom that doesn’t fit, the diagnosis hiding underneath the obvious one. Princeton-Plainsboro is a hospital that exists to house one extraordinary, impossible mind, and everyone around that mind is there because they are smart enough and stubborn enough to keep up. You work best when the stakes are highest, when the standard answer is wrong, and when the only way forward is to think harder than everyone else in the room. That is exactly what you would do here.

Advertisement

Scrubs

You understand that medicine is tragic and absurd in almost equal measure, and that the only sane response is to hold both of those things at the same time. Sacred Heart is a hospital where the laughter and the grief are genuinely inseparable — where a terrible joke can get you through a terrible moment, and where the most ridiculous people are also, on their best days, remarkably good doctors. You are warm, self-aware, and funnier than most people in your field. You lean on the people around you and you let them lean back. Scrubs is a show about learning to become someone worthy of the job — and you are still very much in the middle of that process, which is exactly right.

Advertisement

‘Worst Roommate Ever’ (2022–Present)

Convicted serial killer Dorothea Puente featured in Worst Roommate Ever
Convicted serial killer Dorothea Puente featured in Worst Roommate Ever
Image via Netflix
Advertisement

For a show that premiered in 2022, Netflix’s true-crime documentary Worst Roommate Ever has surely aged poorly in its short stint on the streaming service. Directed by Domini Hofmann and Cynthia Childs, the series tells stories of roommates who turned the lives of their unsuspecting victims upside down. This is a show that would make one think twice about taking in a roommate, but it’s also garnered a lot of criticism for the way it tells its horror stories. While the show’s originally aim was to highlight how some people can hide their malevolent tendencies, Worst Roommate Ever feels less like a cautionary tale, and more like a show that uses the “bad roommate” dynamic for entertainment purposes.

When you watch an episode of Worst Roommate Ever, the first thing that stands out is how sensationalist the series feels, almost like the story an episode is telling is “hyped up” for shock and entertainment value. Using a sensational tone has rubbed some viewers the wrong way, with the tone being inappropriate given the nature of the crimes committed, which often ends in death and long-lasting trauma for the victims who endured it. Also, some feel as though the show’s title itself is misleading. While most people see a “bad roommate” as someone who doesn’t pay their fair share of bills on-time, or leaves their living space a mess, the people portrayed in Worst Roommate Ever are actual criminals that go beyond the “bad roommate” label. You don’t get a deeper understanding of how America’s legal system allows these situations to happen; instead, you get a crime documentary that’s focusing on “scaring” the viewer and nothing else, ensuring that Worst Roommate Ever will surely age like spoiled milk.

‘Hill Street Blues’ (1981–1987)

Michael Warren as Bobby Hill and Charles Haid as Andy Renko in Hill Street Blues
Michael Warren as Bobby Hill and Charles Haid as Andy Renko in Hill Street Blues
Image via NBC
Advertisement

There is zero doubt that the NBC police drama Hill Street Blues is a groundbreaking show that changed how crime shows were made. Created by Steven Bocho and Michael Kozoll, the series created the template for the modern prestige drama, with serialized storylines and overlapping dialogue now becoming a staple of modern day crime shows. However, as revolutionary as the series is, it hasn’t escaped the ravages of times, and there are a combination of things that have made Hill Street Blues age poorly when looked at from today’s cultural lens.

While TV culture was different in the 1980s, the way Hill Street Blues portrayed race and gender is very outdated, as people of color were often seen as criminals or the poor underclass, and casual sexism was the norm. Hill Street Blues also falls under the “Seinfeld is unfunny” phenomenon, in which the techniques that the series popularized have been refined and made better by other shows. Because of this, the show feels chaotic, derivative, and more of a product of its time instead of being the genre-changing series that it is. While it’s OK to still look at Hill Street Blues as a trailblazing crime series, its flaws have certainly made the series age more poorly than most people realize.

‘Law & Order’ (1990–Present)

As mentioned earlier, the cultural perception of law enforcement has changed significantly since the death of George Floyd in 2020, which wasn’t regulated to real world policing, but also to how it was portrayed on television. Suddenly, shows like the iconic Law & Order, created by the legendary Dick Wolf, weren’t looked at as a trailblazing crime series, but one with problematic elements that modern viewers simply can’t dismiss. Just to be clear, Law & Order helped advance the modern prestige crime drama Hill Street Blues brought into vogue in 1981. It was a series that focused on the totality of the justice system, from the detectives who investigate and arrest criminals, to the prosecutors who bring cases to trial, and it helped make Law & Order a powerhouse franchise for NBC.

Advertisement

But with the shifting cultural landscape policing, the cases looked at in Law & Order, which were pulled from existing headlines, don’t feel quite as satisfying as it once did. This is also thanks to how the show portrays the police, as the series is staunchly “pro police,” and portrays the detectives within the series as heroes, making the show feel less like entertainment and more like propaganda. This is not to say that Law & Order is a bad show, far from it; but being a fan also means pointing out its flaws, and the fact of the matter is that this is a show that certainly had flaws that have made it age less like wine and more like milk.


0368467_poster_w780.jpg
Advertisement


Law & Order


Advertisement

Release Date

September 13, 1990

Showrunner

Rick Eid

Advertisement

Directors

Constantine Makris, Edwin Sherin, Jace Alexander, David Platt, Matthew Penn, Martha Mitchell, Don Scardino, Christopher Misiano, Jean de Segonzac, Michael Pressman, Daniel Sackheim, Alex Chapple, Fred Berner, Fred Gerber, Gloria Muzio, James Frawley, Jim McKay, Vincent Misiano, Michael W. Watkins, Vern Gillum, Alex Hall, Dann Florek, Darnell Martin, David Grossman

Advertisement


  • instar52957028.jpg
  • instar51544711-1.jpg

    S. Epatha Merkerson

    Advertisement

    Lieutenant Anita Van Buren

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bethenny Frankel Says Taylor Frankie Paul Drama Is ‘Reality TV Gold’

Published

on

Bethenny Frankel at the 19th Annual L'Oreal Paris' Women Of Worth Celebration 2024

Former “Real Housewives of New York” star Bethenny Frankel has broken her silence on the controversy surrounding Taylor Frankie Paul, “The Bachelorette,” and “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives.

In a new video, Frankel, who has never been one to bite her tongue, seemed to slam Paul and her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen, for putting their minor children through a “toxic” cycle.

In her video, Frankel also praised ABC for cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette,” saying that other networks would love to have one of their stars embroiled in a scandal such as this.

Bethenny Frankel Breaks Her Silence On Taylor Frankie Paul Drama

In her video, Frankel, who spent years on reality TV, said there are two villains in the Paul and Mortensen situation and one victim: their minor child, Ever.

“The couple, who are in a toxic, self-fulfilling spiral, have subjected the child to this environment,” she said.

Advertisement

Frankel went on to say that she could understand if someone working four jobs chose to stay in a problematic relationship.

“But in any other situation, there is absolutely no excuse,” she added.

Frankel Comments On ABC Cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s Season Of ‘The Bachelorette’

Bethenny Frankel at the 19th Annual L'Oreal Paris' Women Of Worth Celebration 2024
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

Frankel then spoke about ABC’s decision to cancel the upcoming season of “The Bachelorette,” in which Paul was scheduled to star.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” the statement said, per The Blast.

Frankel said that ABC did “the right thing” by pulling the show, despite knowing the company could lose over $10 million in revenue.

Advertisement

The “Skinny Girl” founder said in her video that Paul’s situation would be “reality gold” on other networks. “This is reality gold,” she added before saying, “In fact, people are probably contemplating how to get her on their show.”

“So, don’t hate the player, hate the game,” she finished.

Taylor Frankie Paul Appears To Strike, Choke, And Throw Chairs At Her Ex-Boyfriend In Shocking Video

ABC’s decision to cancel Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” came after a video of her appearing to assault her ex, Mortensen, was shared online.

The clip shows Paul striking Mortensen, pulling his hair, and even throwing two metal chairs at him, one of which hit her daughter.

“This is called physical abuse. This is all you do,” Mortensen said in the video. “It’s the only thing you know how to do is hurt me. You think this is OK? It’s not OK. Holy sh-t.”

Advertisement

Mortensen And Paul Speak Out Following Heavy Week

Taylor Frankie Paul
LISA OConnor/AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Through her representative, Paul broke her silence on the situation and thanked ABC for their support.

“After years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm,” the rep said.

Mortensen called the situation “deeply upsetting” in a statement to PEOPLE. “I am, unfortunately, used to these baseless claims about me and our relationship, which I categorically deny. I am focusing on our son and his safety, and hope that Taylor will do the same,” he continued.

‘Bachelorette’ Conestants Told Contracts Would Remain In Place For A Year

According to a previous report from The Blast, ABC met with the majority of the men who filmed Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” to inform them that their contracts would remain in place for at least a year.

Advertisement

“All of the men were on the call with Warner Bros. except for the winner,” a source close to the show said. “The lawyers told them all their contracts will be in place for a year.”

The source shared that while the men’s season will not air on television, they will still be considered for future opportunities with the show and network, including “Bachelor in Paradise.”

TMZ recently reported that some of the contestants are considering a lawsuit against the network over its sudden decision to pull the show.

An insider told the outlet that some of the men uprooted their lives to film with the hope of gaining notoriety. Additionally, the source claimed some of the men believe ABC and Warner Bros placed them in harm’s way by filming with Paul, who has been arrested and charged with felony assault in the past.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

“Project Hail Mary” directors reveal how getting fired from “Star Wars” affected their Ryan Gosling space movie

Published

on


Phil Lord and Chris Miller reflect on “Solo: A Star Wars Story”: “No matter how it turns out, they can’t take away what you’ve learned.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Keith Urban’s Daughters ‘Cut Off Contact’ With Singer Amid Parents’ Divorce

Published

on

Keith Urban at the 60th Academy of Country Music Awards

Keith Urban has seemingly lost more than just his marriage over the past year. After nearly two decades with Nicole Kidman, the pair split in September over irreconcilable differences.

According to reports, his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with Nicole Kidman, have allegedly cut him off.

As part of their divorce agreement, Nicole Kidman was granted primary custody, with orders that the children spend over 300 days a year with her.

Advertisement

Keith Urban’s Kids Have Essentially Cut Him Off, Source Reveals

Keith Urban at the 60th Academy of Country Music Awards
Tammie Arroyo / AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Since splitting from Nicole Kidman, Keith Urban has kept busy with his ongoing tour and appears to be coping well with the end of his marriage on the outside.

However, behind the scenes, he is said to be facing a difficult time with regard to his relationship with his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with the actress.

Earlier reports claimed there was a growing distance between him and his daughters, and the situation is now said to have worsened in recent weeks.

“The kids have essentially cut off contact with Keith,” a source told Rob Shuter’s #ShutterScoop. “This isn’t just about a quote — it’s been building for a while.”

Urban’s relationship with his daughters became strained following his split from Kidman, and while he has tried to remain patient for things to improve, he is now reportedly losing hope that they will.

Advertisement

“He’s putting on a brave face,” the source says. “But privately, he feels like he’s lost his daughters.”

The Singer Was ‘Really Hurt’ By His Daughter Not Acknowledging Him In A Recent Interview

Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman at the 58th Annual Academy of Country Music Awards
Casey Flanigan/imageSPACE / MEGA

While Keith Urban has been touring, his daughters have remained with Nicole Kidman, who has primary custody under their divorce agreement.

In recent weeks, the actress has appeared with them at events, highlighting the close bond they share.

This became even more apparent when Sunday Rose called Kidman her “biggest inspiration” and credited her as a “key part of everything” she does in a recent interview with an Australia-based outlet.

Despite Urban being a creative himself, there was little to no mention of him in the remarks from the 17-year-old, which, according to insiders, deeply stung the singer.

Advertisement

“Seeing it in black and white like that really hurt,” said a source, adding that Urban “feels erased.”

As for his relationship with his daughters, Urban is said to be uncomfortable with the current status quo but feels powerless as he “doesn’t know how to fix it.”

Sources Claim Nicole Kidman Didn’t Turn Her Kids Against Their Father

Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban at Los Angeles Premiere Of "The Northman" - Los Angeles
MEGA

Previous speculation suggested that Kidman had turned the children against their father, but sources have refuted this, noting that the couple’s daughters are old enough to form their own understanding of the situation.

“Nicole hasn’t turned the kids on him; they’ve made their own choices about their dad,” an insider remarked, per the Daily Mail. “She isn’t like that. Keith hasn’t tried much to make things better in their eyes. The girls have always been very close with their mother. They are her everything.”

Meanwhile, regarding why the children appear upset with their father, it is believed to be linked to allegations that he played a role in inspiring the divorce.

Advertisement

“The girls are definitely Team Nicole – they’re in her corner, they’re hurt and angry on her behalf,” the insider claimed. “There’s some resentment against Keith. If they are blaming someone, it’s him, not her.”

Keith Urban Was Left Feeling ‘Betrayed’ By Nicole Kidman’s Closeness With Male Co-Star

LOS ANGELES - MAR 27: Keith Urban, Nicole Kidman at the 94th Academy Awards at Dolby Theater on March 27, 2022 in Los Angeles, CA
MEGA

Since their split, neither Kidman nor Urban has publicly debuted a new relationship.

However, the actress’s seemingly close relationship with her Scarpetta co-star, Simon Baker, has left Urban feeling “betrayed,” per Woman’s Day.

A source added that the singer is hoping the duo is “just hamming it up for headlines,” given their recent collaboration.

“Even then, it feels to him like it’s a betrayal because both Nicole and Simon know how much even the hint of a romance between them will hurt him.”

Advertisement

The Singer’s ‘Worst Nightmare’ Has Come True

Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban at the 'Big Little Lies' Season 2 Premiere in New York City
MEGA

The source also noted that Urban had long been aware of the growing bond between Kidman and Baker since filming.

The closeness, which has seemingly deepened since Kidman’s split from Urban, has reportedly left the singer feeling quite unhappy.

“He already suspected they were getting close while filming. This is his worst nightmare come true,” the insider noted.

They added, “He hates that they’re giving interviews about how close they are.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Taylor Sheridan’s 89% Rotten Tomatoes ‘Yellowstone’ Miniseries Is Still the Greatest Spin-off

Published

on

Taylor Sheridan’s 89% Rotten Tomatoes ‘Yellowstone’ Miniseries Is Still the Greatest Spin-off

In the wake of Taylor Sheridan‘s new neo-Western drama The Madison and his work producing the Yellowstone sequel series Marshals, there’s no better time to revisit his greatest installment in the Dutton saga. In case you were still under the impression that the Kevin Costner series is the best that Sheridan has to offer, let us redirect you to the first Yellowstone origin story: 1883. The 10-part Western miniseries is everything you could hope for in a gritty, Sheridan-style westward adventure — and it effortlessly rides laps around the other franchise installments.

‘1883’ Is a Brutal Western Miniseries That Pulls No Punches

From the opening shot, 1883 pulls no punches. This prequel isn’t some sugar-coated, mythic retelling of the American West, but rather a downright brutal depiction of what made the wild frontier so dangerous. The drama itself follows James (Tim McGraw) and Margaret Dutton (Faith Hill) as the pair aim to move their family, including daughter Elsa (Isabel May) and young son John (Audie Rick), to the northwest paradise of Oregon. Of course, they never quite make it that far, settling instead in the Montana lands that would become the permanent home for the Dutton family for generations. Chronicling the wagon train’s departure from Fort Worth, Texas, until it reaches Big Sky Country, 1883 is a masterclass in how to tell a sprawling Western tale with style and substance throughout.

Advertisement

The show’s impressive cast is part of why audiences continue to flock to the miniseries. Married duo and musicians Tim McGraw and Faith Hill are surprisingly effective as James and Margaret Dutton. 1883 emphasizes their acting ability to the max as their respective characters are put to the test again and again on this perilous journey to “a better life.” Joining them is Union Captain Shea Brennan, played by the genre staple Sam Elliott, and boy, does he deliver. While the three of them carry much of the miniseries, the rest of the ensemble, which includes Isabel May, LaMonica Garrett, Marc Rissmann, and Gratiela Brancusi, help add further weight and emotional attachment to these characters. Guest stars like Graham Greene, Rita Wilson, and Tom Hanks also elevate the material with their simple presence.





















































Advertisement

Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz
Which Taylor Sheridan
Show Do You Belong In?

Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown

Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.

🤠Yellowstone

🛢️Landman

Advertisement

👑Tulsa King

⚖️Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

01

Where does your power come from?
In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.




Advertisement

02

Who do you put first, no matter what?
Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.




Advertisement

03

Someone crosses a line. How do you respond?
Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.




Advertisement

04

Where do you feel most in your element?
Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.




Advertisement

05

How do you feel about operating in the grey?
Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.




Advertisement

06

What are you actually fighting to hold onto?
Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.




Advertisement

07

How do you lead?
Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.




Advertisement

08

Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction?
Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.




Advertisement

09

What has your position cost you?
Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.




Advertisement

10

When it’s over, what do you want people to say?
Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.




Advertisement

Sheridan Has Spoken
You Belong In…

The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.

Advertisement

🤠
Yellowstone

🛢️
Landman

👑
Tulsa King

Advertisement

⚖️
Mayor of Kingstown

You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.

Advertisement

You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.

You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.

Advertisement

You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.

Advertisement

As far as the historical side of things goes, 1883 does its best to be as period-accurate as possible, though it isn’t afraid to trade minor details for more thrilling results. Case in point is Billy Bob Thornton‘s inclusion as Marshal Jim Courtright. Long before Thornton would headline Sheridan’s Landman, Courtright was the perfect role for the actor, though it’s a small departure from Courtright’s actual life experience in 1883. The same could be said for Hank’s General George Meade, who, though a real Civil War general, didn’t yet hold the rank that 1883 presents him with. Minor deviations aside, 1883 excels at bringing these historical figures to life with class — even Sheridan himself shows up as real-life historical rancher Charlie Goodnight.

Taylor Sheridan’s Original ‘Yellowstone’ Prequel Is His Television Triumph

If there’s one thing that’s clear about this Yellowstone prequel, it’s that 1883 works so marvelously because of its self-contained nature. Compared to Sheridan’s other television contributions, 1883 is a one-and-done event that effortlessly snapshots a moment in U.S. history. The Duttons we meet here don’t feel like extensions of the characters we know from Yellowstone, nor do the events of the series feel as if they need to continue beyond the 10 episodes we’re given. In many respects, it feels as if Sheridan had gone back to his American Frontier trilogy roots to tell a single tale that doesn’t spend time on recycled drama, dialogue, and overall thematic material. Like other Western miniseries epics such as Lonesome Dove or Into the West, 1883 is perfect as is, and can be enjoyed completely divorced from Yellowstone.

Advertisement

This is where the 1883 sequel (and Yellowstone‘s second prequel), 1923, falls somewhat short by comparison. Although it does well to highlight another generation of Duttons at a distinct period in Montana’s history, it struggles to hold interest on occasion as Sheridan unnecessarily prolongs the drama and repurposes tired Yellowstone-style land-grabbing plots into the main narrative, effectively erasing much of what made that two-season adventure unique compared to the flagship series. 1883 doesn’t fall into this trap. Its perfect length, rich characters, and clear Western plot make for a combination that is so easily bingeable that we can fully understand how (and why) it continues to dominate the charts.

1883 is available for streaming on Paramount+.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Tom Holland Promotes Zendaya’s The Drama Amid Marriage Rumor

Published

on

Zendaya can easily count Tom Holland to be her No. 1 cheerleader — as rumors about their marital status only intensify.

“I honestly couldn’t be more excited for you to see this movie,” Holland, 29, wrote via Instagram on Saturday, March 21, along with a promotional image for the film featuring Zendaya, also 29, posing as a bride alongside costar Robert Pattinson. “Believe me when I say it’s gonna floor you. Get your tickets now!”

Zendaya stars opposite Pattinson, 39, in The Drama, an A24 film about a couple’s wedding day and all the antics that subsequently ensue.

In real life, Zendaya and Holland have been together since 2021 after playing love interests in Marvel’s Spider-Man franchise. They subtly debuted their engagement at the 2025 Golden Globes, when Zendaya walked the red carpet solo with a giant engagement ring on her finger.

Advertisement
Zendaya Jokes About Keeping ‘Secrets’ Amid Tom Holland Wedding Rumors and Gushes Over the Actor


Related: Zendaya Jokes About Keeping ‘Secrets’ Amid Tom Holland Wedding Rumors

Zendaya played off wedding rumors in the chillest way. Zendaya, 29, kept a tight lip when asked about any “secrets” she’s keeping during The Drama premiere in Los Angeles on Tuesday, March 17. While talking to Extra, Zendaya teased the secret her character, Emma Harwood, is keeping from her fiancé, Charlie Thompson, played by Robert […]

“Tom figured the holidays were the best time to propose in a very low-key way,” a source exclusively told Us Weekly in January 2025. “She didn’t want anything over the top.”

Advertisement

According to the insider, Holland and Zendaya were eager to start their next chapter together.

“Tom wanted to propose because he feels he is at the right time in his life and feels ready to settle down,” the insider told Us last year. “They had many conversations over the years, but there was never any pressure. Zendaya is giddy and excited. She knew it might have been coming but never put pressure on it.”

Zendaya-GettyImages-2266638102

Zendaya attends the Los Angeles premiere of “The Drama” on Tuesday, March 17.
LISA O’CONNOR / AFP

Holland and the Euphoria actress remained relatively quiet about their wedding plans until her longtime stylist, Law Roach, proclaimed earlier this month that the couple were already married.

“The wedding has already happened,” Roach, 47, told Access Hollywood at the Actor Awards in March. “You missed it. It’s very true.”

Weeks later, Roach stated at the 2026 Oscars that he “said what [he] said” and stood by his viral comments about Zendaya’s potential nuptials.

Advertisement

Neither Zendaya nor Holland publicly clarified whether they are indeed husband and wife already. Us Weekly reached out to reps for both actors for comment.

Zendaya’s Mom Cryptically Reacts to Tom Holland Marriage Rumors


Related: Zendaya’s Mom Cryptically Reacts to Tom Holland Marriage Rumors

Zendaya’s mom, Claire Stoermer, cryptically reacted to stylist Law Roach’s recent claim that the Euphoria actress has already married longtime beau Tom Holland. Roach, 47, set the rumor mill into overdrive on Sunday, March 1, during a red carpet interview with Entertainment Tonight at SAG’s 2026 Actor Awards. Zendaya’s stylist teased that the long-awaited nuptials […]

Advertisement

Zendaya, however, has seen the online chatter about her marital status and the AI-generated pictures from a potential wedding.

“Many people have been fooled by them while I was just out and about in real life,” Zendaya said on Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Monday, March 16, when asked about the fake ceremony portraits circulating on social media. “People are like, ‘Oh, my God, your wedding photos are gorgeous!’ I was like, ‘Babe, they’re AI! They’re not real!’”

Attempting to clarify the speculation, the actress brought a video that ended up to be a scene from The Drama with Holland’s head superimposed over Pattinson’s body.

“It was a beautiful day. That was real footage,” she joked on Monday. “That was real. I was there.”

The Drama hits theaters Friday, April 3.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Todd Tucker Sparks Buzz With Message For Kandi Burruss

Published

on

Todd Tucker Sparks Reactions After Sharing Message For Kandi Burruss Ahead Of Her One-Woman Show

Roommates, Todd Tucker ruffled some feathers with the message he dropped for Kandi Burruss ahead of her one-woman show. The internet isn’t too happy about his choice of words. Now, folks are questioning whether he threw shade or just made a joke that didn’t hit!

RELATED: Todd Tucker Has Social Media Cuttin’ UP With Reactions After Unveiling His Fresh New Look (VIDEOS)

Todd Tucker Raises Eyebrows After Dropping Message For Kandi Burruss

Todd Tucker sent words Kandi Burruss’ way as she gears up for her one-woman show, ‘I Do, I Did, I’m… DONE.’ The father of three shared a post on Instagram that gave more than a simple “good luck” or “break a leg” — he added a lil’ play on words telling his former wife:

“Yo a** aint done lol just kidding! Go Support your girl Kandi!!!! @citywineryatl on April 27th.” 

Even though it seemed to be a lil’ jokey joke, fans weren’t here for it one bit! Some folks said he took it too far, while others said they love that Todd and Kandi can still joke around after finalizing their divorce.

The Internet Thinks Todd Is “Doin’ TOO Much”

After the Roommates peeped Todd’s message for Kandi, TSR’s comment section was flooded with reactions. Some folks said Todd cracked jokes because he allegedly got paid after their divorce, while others felt he was just playing in Burruss’ face.

Advertisement

Instagram user @lisonup wrote, Todd said, 🎶 I’m staying, I’m staying, and youuuu, and youuu, and youuu, you’re gonna loovee meeeeeeeeee🎶” 

Instagram user @iamkingsamuel wrote, Man just happy about that 2M payout 😂😂😂😂😂😂” 

While Instagram user @rob_lane_edits wrote, It was a scheme.” 

Then Instagram user @london.llaflare wrote,I would too if I was getting 2M.” 

Advertisement

Another Instagram user @mogulk___ wrote, “He not tryna get kicked out the back yard 😭” 

Instagram user @theshaysims wrote, He’s playing in her face i don’t like that.” 

Then another Instagram user @_thelittlethick1 wrote, He Got His Money, He Wanna Play Now 😂”

While another Instagram user @toychele81 wrote, U know.. Life is better on good terms! Not everything has to include drama! Love to see it!” 

Advertisement

Finally, Instagram user @cheryl.fleming.7902 wrote, “I really think they still love each other ❤️❤️” 

Todd & Kandi Finally Call It Quits FOR REAL

Folks online appear to be up in arms about Todd’s post because his message comes after TMZ confirmed that he and Burruss officially finalized their divorce. Exact deets on their settlement still aren’t public, but for now they are both going their separate ways and will co-parent accordingly. According to court docs, the former husband and wife had until March 11 to break down their settlement and submit paperwork. The docs are reportedly set to include a parenting plan for their two kids, nine-year-old Ace and their six-year-old daughter Blaze.

 

RELATED: Issa Wrap! Kandi Burruss & Todd Tucker Reportedly Finalize Their Divorce (UPDATE)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025