Connect with us

Entertainment

15 Years Later, Jake Gyllenhaal’s High-Stakes Sci-Fi Time-Loop Thriller Breaks Into Free Streaming

Published

on

Daylight-Sylvester-Stallone

The 2010s gave us no shortage of ambitious sci-fi, but not every great original thriller got the long-term attention it deserved. Some films arrived with strong reviews, a great cast, and a killer premise, only to slowly build their reputation over time instead of exploding instantly into pop culture immortality. That’s exactly what happened with Source Code.

Released in 2011, Jake Gyllenhaal’s time-loop thriller has only gotten more appreciated with age, and now it’s found a new streaming home. Fifteen years later, Source Code is now streaming free on Fawesome, making it much easier to revisit one of the sharpest sci-fi thrillers of its era. The film stars Gyllenhaal as Captain Colter Stevens, a soldier who suddenly wakes up in the body of a stranger on a Chicago commuter train. Within minutes, the train explodes — and then he wakes up again in a mysterious capsule, where he learns he’s part of an experimental program that allows him to relive the final eight minutes of another person’s life.

Source Code also stars Michelle Monaghan as Christina Warren, Vera Farmiga as Colleen Goodwin, and Jeffrey Wright as Dr. Rutledge. The supporting cast also includes Michael Arden as Derek Frost, Cas Anvar as Hazmi, Russell Peters as Max Denoff, and Brent Skagford as George Troxel.

Advertisement
Daylight-Sylvester-Stallone


Daylight Saving Time — The Collider Movie Quiz!

Daylight Saving Time starts this weekend. Before we lose an hour of sleep, here’s a quiz about movie titles that contain Daylight, Saving, or Time.

Advertisement

How Good Is ‘Source Code’?

Jake Gyllenhaal, with wounds on his face, aims a gun into a train in Source Code
Jake Gyllenhaal in Source Code.
Image via Summit Entertainment

Collider’s review stated that Source Code proves Duncan Jones’ acclaimed debut Moon was no fluke, delivering a fast-paced science-fiction thriller that balances mainstream action with thoughtful ideas about identity, sacrifice, and the ethics of turning soldiers into weapons. Where the film stumbles slightly is in its final act. The story builds toward a powerful and fitting ending, but instead pushes beyond that moment to deliver a more optimistic resolution.

“Where Source Code has the biggest problem is in its finish. The film comes to a moment which would work as a final scene, and then it bypasses that scene to go for something more complex and uplifting. Jones delivers so much of the film with tremendous confidence that it’s jarring to see him twist the narrative into knots so that the audience can leave feeling upbeat (and chances are they’ll leave confused). Despite a slightly weak finish, Source Code is another triumph for Jones. He’s shown that he can manage a mid-budget studio film that will appeal to mainstream audiences without sacrificing the thoughtful sci-fi elements that made Moon such a breath of fresh air.”

Source Code is streaming now on Fawesome.


Advertisement
source-code-film-poster-1.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

April 1, 2011

Runtime
Advertisement

93 Minutes

Director

Duncan Jones

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Celebs Wiggin’ Out For International Wig Day!

Published

on

Celebs Wiggin' Out!

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bold and the Beautiful CHAOS: Katie’s Product Launch Explodes – All-Out War Erupts!

Published

on

Bold and the Beautiful: Katie Logan's (Heather Tom) - Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang)

Bold and the Beautiful thrills as Katie Logan‘s (Heather Tom) big debut fashion show for Logan and we know Ridge Forrester (Thorsten Kaye) and Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang) show up uninvited and crash it so that’s a recipe for chaos.

We’re going to talk about how Katie’s big moment at the Logan fashion show may be sabotaged by Brooke and her hubby and turn into a wild family feud that could damage both Logan and Forrester Creations.

Bold and the Beautiful: Ridge Loses it

Ok so, we know from official Bold and the Beautiful spoilers that Ridge, Brooke, Katie, and Bill Spencer (Don Diamont) have dinner together but things go sideways and they all end up arguing. Over at Brooke’s house, we’ll have Ridge and Brooke extending an olive branch to Katie.

But it might be more of an insult than a peace offering. And then Ridge flies off the handle and starts yelling at Bill. And then by the end of the week, we have Brooke and Ridge crashing Katie’s press conference and you know they don’t show up with good intentions.

Advertisement

We also know that Bill tells Katie that the designs belong to them and they’re using them. That might be what inspires Ridge and Brooke to crash and make a scene because Ridge thinks those designs should be property of Forrester Creations.

Bold and the Beautiful: Ridge and Brooke May Accuse Katie of Stealing Designs

Let’s talk about what Ridge and Brooke might do to ruin Katie’s big day. First, Ridge and Brooke may tell the press at the launch that the designs on the runway are stolen. They may accuse Katie and Bill of using designs that are the rightful property of Forrester Creations.

Ridge already made it clear he wants those designs. He and Brooke made a lot of unfounded accusations about Katie using Eric Forrester (John McCook) when he’s the one who insisted she hire him. We still haven’t seen Katie, Ridge, Bill, Brooke and Eric all together hashing this out properly.

They May Claim Katie Stole from Eric Forrester on B&B

Second, I expect Ridge and Brooke to not only say that Katie and Bill hijacked designs that belong to Forrester Creations, but even worse, they stole them from the iconic Eric Forrester. Even though that’s not true because Bill paid Eric to create custom designs for Katie.

Advertisement

In fact, it was Eric himself who insisted he’d be Katie’s short-term lead designer. And he didn’t just use the existing collection he’d designed. Eric made a whole new set of designs. But if Brooke and Ridge tell the fashion press they’re stolen, that could ruin Katie’s company.

Bold and the Beautiful: Brooke May Accuse Katie of Stealing the Logan Trademark

Third, to make matters even worse, I can also see Brooke making a big scene and accusing Katie of stealing the Logan trademark even though she absolutely did not. In fact, Forrester Creations never once used the name Logan as a brand and its trademark was not in use.

Then, on top of that, Carter Walton (Lawrence Saint-Victor) let the registration lapse. So, Katie didn’t steal it—she claimed it. And literally, anyone could’ve registered Logan as a trademark once it lapsed. And it is Katie’s last name. Like when the Kardashians all use their last name.

But Ridge and Brooke keep saying she stole the trademark. You can’t just squat on a trademark name and not use it, by the way, that’s federal law. I know fans are torn about who has the right to use the Logan name. But legally, both Katie and Brooke have the right.

Advertisement

We could see Katie shocked if Brooke starts the accusations in front of the media to humiliate Katie and sabotage her launch.

Bold and the Beautiful: They May Accuse Katie of Working Eric to Death

The fourth thing we could see Ridge and Brooke do to humiliate Katie is accuse her and Bill of targeting Eric and how Katie and Bill worked Eric almost to death. Brooke and Ridge may say that Katie ran Eric so hard and stressing him so much that he collapsed.

John McCook said in a recent interview that Eric doesn’t have an underlying health condition, it was just the stress of all the family bickering. Heck, Ridge could even say Katie tried to kill Eric because he already accused her of that even though it’s totally bogus.

Bold and the Beautiful: Katie Logan's (Heather Tom) - Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang)Bold and the Beautiful: Katie Logan's (Heather Tom) - Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang)
Bold and the Beautiful: Katie Logan – Brooke Logan

Eric May Show Up to Set the Record Straight

Fifth and finally, Ridge and Brooke might find the script flipped on them. This is what I’m really hoping to see. As Ridge and Brooke are making Katie and Bill look terrible in front of the fashion media and their invited guests, it’d be wild if Eric shows up to set things straight.

Ridge said he felt bad for treating his father like a child but then went behind Eric’s back to do it again, telling Katie and Bill that the designs aren’t theirs, Eric isn’t going to work with them and again accusing them of stealing Logan and taking advantage of the Forresters on Bold and the Beautiful.

Advertisement

No matter whose side you’re on, Brooke or Katie’s, facts are facts and Eric did approach Katie and basically told her he’d be her lead designer. Katie tried to tell him no because it would cause problems and yet Eric still insisted. That was his choice.

I expect Ridge and Brooke are going to make a scene slinging slanted information along with some outright false accusations. I don’t think Eric’s going to let Ridge get away with this. Because he told Katie he’d make sure she got launched.

Bold and the Beautiful: Katie’s Big Launch

And despite Eric’s little breathing issue, he’s still committed to her so I’d like to think he won’t let Ridge and Brooke get away with ruining everything for Katie. And honestly, if Ridge and Brooke are misrepresenting things with Eric, he’ll want to set the record straight.

Brooke and Ridge trying to wreck Katie’s big Logan launch is likely going to finish breaking Brooke and Katie’s relationship. I think Bill may advise Katie to cut Brooke off completely after this press conference stunt.

Advertisement

We’ll see what happens, but it seems extremely unlikely that Ridge and Brooke are crashing the press conference to say nice things about Katie and her new company. No, they are there to make trouble and there’s no telling what Brooke and Ridge might say.

With VIPs there and lots of fashion journalists on hand, this is a really rotten thing to do but I’m sure Brooke and Ridge will feel justified in what they’re doing. And that’s why I hope Eric shows up to clear things up and put Ridge and Brooke in their place for deciding things for him again.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

The Star Trek Cameo So Great It Almost Created A New Series

Published

on

The Star Trek Cameo So Great It Almost Created A New Series

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Pop quiz, Star Trek nerds: who’s your favorite character from The Next Generation? There are plenty of potential answers out there: the suave and sophisticated Picard, the debonair and dashing Riker, the quirky-but-brilliant Data, and so on. Few fans would pick minor character Barclay, but it turns out that he almost became one of the most important characters in all of Star Trek.

You see, Dwight Schultz reprised his Barclay role in Star Trek: Voyager, beginning with the episode “Projections.” That episode heavily featured Robert Picardo’s fan-favorite Doctor character, and Picardo spent a significant amount of time acting alongside Schultz. The two had such amazing chemistry together, causing episode writer Brannon Braga to give them the highest praise possible. Namely, he suggested that Picardo and Schultz should headline their own Star Trek spinoff series.

From Deflectors To Projectors

In case you don’t have a holodeck handy, here’s a quick recap of “Projections:” after Voyager gets attacked by the Kazon, the Doctor must tend to the injuries of the crew.  However, he soon discovers that he has injuries of his own, something that should be impossible because he is a hologram rather than flesh and blood. He is made to believe that he is the human creator of the Emergency Medical Hologram, Lewis Zimmerman, which is corroborated by Reginald Barclay. The former TNG supporting character claims the Doctor must destroy the ship to escape this program, but he eventually learns that doing so may actually get him killed.

While fans generally liked Dwight Schultz on The Next Generation, he played a very minor character, and he didn’t have particularly great chemistry with anyone. However, several big names who worked on Voyager’s “Projections” remarked that he had absolutely amazing chemistry with Robert Picardo. Nobody was more impressed by the two of them than episode writer Brannon Braga, who remarked (as recorded in Captains’ Logs Supplemental – The Unauthorized Guide to the New Trek Voyages) that “Those two were so good together they should have a spin-off series.”

Additionally, “Projections” was directed by The Next Generation star Jonathan Frakes, who did such a good job that this episode helped him land the gig to direct Star Trek: First Contact. Regarding the onscreen chemistry between Picardo and Schultz, the Riker actor didn’t mince words. He claimed (as recorded in Star Trek Communicator) that the two “were brilliant together.”

The Ultimate Tachyon Teamup

Of course, nobody enjoyed the experience of Dwight Schultz’s Voyager cameo quite as much as Robert Picardo. In an interview with Star Trek Monthly, the actor claimed that he and Schultz “knew a lot of the same people in New York City, spent a lot of time doing silly voices and cracked each other up on the set.” When they weren’t actively shooting, the two of them “just reminisced about our pasts in New York City and talked about the theater, which is what stage-trained actors tend to do when they get together.” Picardo would later gush that, thanks to Schultz’s presence, shooting “Projections” felt like one big party.

Advertisement

Obviously, a Doctor/Barclay spinoff series never materialized, but it’s not hard to see why Brannon Braga wanted to make it so. These two were so great in “Projections” that they impressed just about everyone, including Jonathan Frakes, the greatest director the franchise has ever known. While he didn’t get to co-headline his own spinoff series, Schultz got the ultimate consolation prize: extensive cameos in the final two seasons of Star Trek: Voyager.


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Alleged Rihanna House Shooter Ivanna Lisette Ortiz Appears in Court, On Video

Published

on

031026_ivanna_ortiz_court_kal

Advertisement

Advertisement


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

HBO Max’s Emmy-Winning 7-Part Mystery Series Remains One of Its Best

Published

on

Grey's-Anatomy--Ellen-Pompeo-2

It may be time for HBO to turn in its fantasy badge and devote its resources to something a little more realistic. For years, the platform has been capitalizing on the Game of Thrones brand, but it is delivering far more interesting and compelling drama with the Brad Ingelsby universe of gritty mysteries. His best work premiered in 2021, harnessing the common trope of the grizzled detective and making something original.

Mare of Easttown stars Kate Winslet as the titular Delco area detective sergeant, grappling with more than just her case. While investigating the death of a 17-year-old teen mother, Erin (Cailee Spaeny), she also faces personal challenges at home. Ingelsby effortlessly weaves together a mystery with genuine twists and turns in the perfect timeframe of seven episodes. Mare of Easttown is the character-driven series that started a wave of similar shows, such as Ingelsby’s follow-up, Task.

Advertisement

‘Mare of Easttown’ Kept Fans Guessing

The last time HBO connected with audiences on a mystery series was the universally beloved first season of True Detective. The streaming landscape has changed since then, but the small-town detective is still a metric that works. This time, Mare of Easttown took the concept, stripping away its supernatural-adjacent story, and told a story more grounded in the female experience. Mare is a detective in the grips of grief after the suicide of her son. At the same time, she takes on the added pressure of raising her grandson, Drew, while his mother is in rehab. This tragedy destroyed her marriage and led to issues with her daughter, Siobhan (Angourie Rice).

Mare of Easttown shows the full picture of a woman in distress, without the trappings of Hollywood beauty standards. Mare’s mental state is shown both through events in the narrative and in how she carries herself. These subtleties were important to Winslet, who wanted to show Mare’s grief throughout her journey in the series.

The mystery in Mare of Easttown is also a standout, which keeps viewers guessing until its final moments. Before Cailee Spaeny’s breakout in A24 projects Priscilla and Civil War, she expressed heartbreaking vulnerability as Erin, the series’ murdered teen. The first episode takes its time introducing audiences to the complex cast of characters before getting to the crime at hand. In the small area of Easttown, everyone has grown up together and knows one another. The ties that bind are close in the area, making it heartbreaking when Erin is murdered. Spaeny is impeccable as a teen who struggles with young motherhood, and she never gets the chance to overcome her struggles because her life is cut too short.

These close bonds are more revealing about the murderer’s identity than anything else. Mare of Easttown delivers gripping red herrings that make the final reveal shocking. Fans responded overwhelmingly to the series, calling for a second season even though it was initially marketed as a limited series. HBO Max may be listening, as Season 2 appears to have been confirmed tentatively to shoot in 2027. Until then, fans can devour the perfect seven episodes of this mystery series.

Advertisement
Grey's-Anatomy--Ellen-Pompeo-2


The People’s Choice Awards-iversary — The Collider TV Quiz!

On this date in 1975, the first-ever People’s Choice Awards ceremony was held. Here are some notable PCA television winners from the last 51 years.


Advertisement
03173605_poster_w780.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

2021 – 2021-00-00

Advertisement

Network

HBO

Showrunner
Advertisement

Brad Ingelsby

Writers

Brad Ingelsby

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • instar53917739.jpg

    Kate Winslet

    Marianne ‘Mare’ Sheehan

    Advertisement
  • instar52288963.jpg

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Perfect Buffy Episode Secretly Channels Greatest Movie Of All Time

Published

on

Perfect Buffy Episode Secretly Channels Greatest Movie Of All Time

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Normally, The Godfather is the last movie you’d associate with Buffy the Vampire Slayer. After all, the former is the greatest mafia film ever made, and the latter is a show about plucky teenagers fighting demons. As it turns out, though, one perfect episode of Buffy managed to honor The Godfather in a powerful way.

In the episode “Passion,” there is a fairly innocuous scene where a newly evil Angel harasses Joyce Summers, causing her to drop some oranges. Shortly after, Angel murders the Sunnydale High computer science teacher in a brutal attack. These may not seem like related events, but the whole thing is secretly an homage to The Godfather’s “orange motif,” which went on to inspire decades of groundbreaking cinema!

The Not-So-Annoying Orange

What the heck is the orange motif, you ask? If you go back and rewatch The Godfather, you’ll notice there are oranges in so many very important scenes. At first glance, they don’t seem to have much special significance, and you might be forgiven for thinking that director Francis Ford Coppola just has a thing for oranges.

However, what’s important is when the oranges appear: namely, they appear shortly before a character is killed. For example, Vito Corleone is killed, it is while he’s peeling oranges. When the titular Godfather is shot, he is buying oranges, which dramatically scatter on the ground. When the Five Families meet, you can see oranges near the Mafia leaders that would soon be killed.

Because The Godfather was so influential, “the orange motif” (as this phenomenon was eventually called after it was used in the subsequent Godfather films) started popping up in other movies, including Point Break, American Beauty, and Requiem for a Dream. Fittingly enough, the orange motif also popped up in The Sopranos, where we see Tony Soprano buy some orange juice shortly before someone tries to whack him. Before that, though, Joss Whedon hid an orange motif reference in an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Orange You Glad To See Him?

In “Passion,” Angel (who has recently lost his soul and become evil) harasses Joyce Summers outside of her own home, causing her to drop some oranges. While Joyce herself doesn’t die, those dropped oranges and the presence of the show’s scariest vampire foreshadow a major death right around the corner. Soon afterward, Angel kills Jenny Calendar, a beloved character whose death sends a chilling message to viewers: none of your favorites are guaranteed to make it out of Season 2 alive.

In retrospect, it’s not really all that shocking that Buffy the Vampire Slayer hid such a powerful reference to The Godfather in plain sight. After all, the show is filled with references to countless other movies and shows, mostly courtesy of quip-heavy characters like Buffy and Xander. Given how much of a film buff showrunner Joss Whedon and the rest of his team were, it’s not that surprising they wanted to homage one of the greatest movies of all time.

Advertisement

But is the orange motif from The Godfather the greatest cinematic trope of all time? It’s certainly one of the most prolific. As for me, I don’t really like this Godfather reference as much as some Buffy fans turned cinephiles. Why? Because, in the immortal words of Peter Griffin, it insists upon itself!


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

“DWTS” stars Mark Ballas and Whitney Leavitt to reunite for Broadway run of “Chicago”

Published

on


The duo will play Billy Flynn and Roxie Hart in a four-week limited run of ‘Chicago’ from April 6 to May 3.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

No Alimony & No Trash Talk

Published

on

angela deem Michael Ilesanmi main getty tlc


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Woman accused of shooting at Rihanna's house charged with attempted murder, faces life in prison if convicted

Published

on


Ivanna Ortiz was arrested several miles away from the singer’s Beverly Crest residence shortly after the March 8 incident.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Young and the Restless: Audra’s Obsession with Kyle Backfires – Career & Life Destroyed!?!

Published

on

Young and the Restless: Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver) - Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor)

Young and the Restless reveals Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver) is at it again making a terrible choice that’s going to blow up in her face and this time, it could blow up her entire life. And of course, it’s all about Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor) who for Audra, seems to be the one who got away.

We’re going to talk about how she’s going after Kyle again because she can’t back down from a challenge and it could cost Audra absolutely everything.

Young and the Restless: Holden Won’t Back Down

So recently, we saw Holden Novak (Nathan Owens) trying to get Audra to agree to seduce Kyle. That’s because Holden doesn’t want Kyle to reconcile with Claire Grace Newman (Hayley Erin). And that’s because Holden wants Claire for himself. Holden’s absolutely smitten and isn’t going to give up on Claire for even a moment.

But it isn’t Kyle who’s coming between Claire and Holden. We know that Claire still has feelings for Kyle. And probably still loves him and she tapped the brakes with Holden because he wouldn’t tell her the whole truth about him, Audra, and that gallery owner in LA.

Advertisement

Claire Breaks Things Off with Holden on Y&R

But to be fair, it’s really not Claire’s business—she just wanted to destroy Audra out of spite. What’s wild to me is that Claire’s mad at Audra for her scheme to seduce Kyle that Victor Newman (Eric Braeden) was paying Audra to do. But Claire’s not mad at Victor—whose idea it was and paid Audra to do it.

Claire only seems to have issues with non-Newmans being dishonest. Since Holden wouldn’t spill tea on Audra, we saw Claire broke things off with Holden. I’m sure her feelings for Kyle played a role. But I think Claire’s just salty because she didn’t get the dirt to destroy Audra.

Then, Kyle encouraged Claire to let her vendetta against Audra go. And Claire finally said she would let the thing with Audra go because Claire felt like she was becoming her crazy aunt Jordan Howard (Colleen Zenk) by being so bent on revenge.

That was a good call on Claire’s part and it’s probably a good thing she dropped her revenge plot on Audra. If not for Holden interfering and pushing Audra to go after Claire again, this whole feud could’ve just died.

Advertisement

Young and the Restless: Holden Convinces Audra to Seduce Kyle

But I think pretty soon Claire’s going to resume her vendetta because Audra’s going to once again target Kyle for seduction. But this time, it’s with Holden pushing Audra to do it instead of Victor. Official Y&R spoilers say the truth about what Holden and Audra did will come out soon.

And the spoiler said the fallout for Holden and Audra is going to be huge. And I think those two bring it on themselves. So, when Holden first suggested to Audra that they end Claire and Kyle’s connection for good, she wanted no part of it.

Audra said she didn’t want to set Claire off after she nearly choked her out a few months back. Audra also claimed she wanted nothing to do with Kyle because he’s a “walking ego” and Audra said Kyle makes her skin crawl.

But Holden said now that Audra has a great job, he thinks she needs a new mission and Holden suggested Audra should get revenge on Kyle. And to be fair, Audra pushed back on Holden because she doesn’t want to risk her new partnership with Sally Spectra (Courtney Hope)—especially not for Kyle.

Advertisement

Young and the Restless: Holden Determined to Win Claire Back

Holden didn’t let up and kept pushing Audra saying he knows she can make Kyle come crawling back and that would make her the winner. Holden also said Audra would be untouchable with an Abbott by her side if she decided to keep Kyle.

Audra was confident that she could make Kyle beg to be with her. But Audra claimed to have neither the time or interest. But then, Kyle came into Society and glared at Audra, and Holden told Audra that she and Kyle belong together and then Holden asked Audra to help them get what they both want.

Which is Holden to get Claire and Audra to get Kyle. At that point, Holden had finally convinced Audra and she was on board to go after Kyle and seduce him to be her guy. But honestly, this is really not a smart move on Audra’s part.

Young and the Restless: Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver) - Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor)Young and the Restless: Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver) - Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor)
Young and the Restless: Audra Charles – Kyle Abbott

Audra Hasn’t Learned Her Lesson on Young and the Restless

You’d think she would’ve learned after the last time she schemed with Victor to seduce Kyle on Young and the Restless. Because that blew up in Audra’s face and she lost Nate Hastings (Sean Dominic). You would really think Audra would have learned her lesson after that. But apparently not.

Claire decided to drop her revenge plot on Audra. But then, Holden got all jealous about Kyle and got Audra all worked up, making it a challenge. So, when Audra goes after Kyle, of course, that’ll send Claire into a rage and then she’ll start digging again.

Advertisement

And then I’m sure she’ll find out about the dead art guy and what Audra and Holden did. Plus, Sienna Bacall (Tamara Braun) is in town now. And since Holden accidentally killed the guy at the Shadow Room, Sienna may have some info she’s been holding back that she could give to Claire.

Especially since Sienna’s now in tight with the Newmans. So, Holden may have just shot himself in the foot because everything he wanted to stay hidden is gonna come out. As I mentioned before, official Y&R spoilers say Audra and Holden’s secret is exposed and the fallout’s massive.

Young and the Restless: Audra’s Scheme Could Cost Her Everything

This is all so needless since things are finally going great for Audra. And Holden pushed her buttons and basically convinced Audra to self-sabotage. I think seducing Kyle as a power play could wind up costing Audra her fancy new job since Jill Abbott (Jess Walton) is the financial backer.

And Sally might take a step back from Audra for her doing this awful scheme. Plus, when Claire exposes the truth, Audra and Holden could both land in legal trouble or be run out of town. And if there’s possible criminal charges, Sally would have no choice but to fire her bestie.

Advertisement

Remember when Audra said that she didn’t want Holden back in her life because he’s an extreme risk taker? We’ve not seen that side of him. But we’re about to and I think Audra letting Holden get close again is going to wreck her life.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025