Entertainment

6 ’90s Sci-Fi Movies That Are Terrible From Start to Finish

Published

on

Sci-fi films are known for their creative storytelling and strong technical skills that make the genre exciting for movie lovers. Classics like 2001: A Space Odyssey and newer films like Avatar: Fire and Ash show the potential of sci-fi in cinema. However, there are also many poorly made sci-fi movies, especially front he 90s when almost every other film was a hit.

Even the worst sci-fi films may have some good parts that keep them from being completely unwatchable. This makes truly terrible films stand out more, as they can be very hard to watch due to their utter and complete lack of positives. Here is the list of 6 terrible 90s sci-fi movies I would advise you never to watch.

Advertisement

6

‘Super Mario Bros’ (1993)

Close up of Bob Hoskins as Mario Mario looking shocked in Super Mario Bros
Image via Buena Vista Pictures Distribution

The classic Super Mario Bros. story follows Italian-American plumbers Mario (Bob Hoskins) and Luigi (John Leguizamo), who discover a parallel universe ruled by the ruthless King of Koopas (Dennis Hopper). He kidnaps Daisy (Samantha Mathis) to merge the dimensions and conquer both worlds; so, the brothers must travel to the dystopian city of Dinohattan to rescue her.

The film had an interesting mix of fantasy and science fiction, but it strayed too far from the popular video game it was based on. Viewers felt let down by its confusing world, inconsistent tone, and odd choices. Instead of capturing the fun and color of the games, the movie created a darker setting that didn’t resonate with audiences. Because of this, it is considered one of the least successful video game adaptations ever made.

Advertisement

5

‘Johnny Mnemonic’ (1995)

Keanu Reeves wearing a silver head band of metal in ‘Johnny Mnemonic’.
Image via TriStar Pictures

Johnny Mnemonic follows Johnny (Keanu Reeves), a data courier in a future where people use cybernetic implants to store and transport information. He takes on a risky job that gives him more data than he can handle. This data could kill him if it’s not removed quickly. As powerful organizations come after him, Johnny looks for answers and teams up with others who might help him discover the truth in his mind.

The film introduced some interesting ideas about cyberpunk, but it struggled to connect them in a good way. There were some problems like uneven pacing, awkward dialogue, and weak character development. It almost felt that the story’s big ideas got lost in a confusing plot that didn’t fully explore them. Although Johnny Mnemonic has gained a small cult following over time, it is still seen as one of the weaker science fiction films from the 1990s.

Advertisement

4

‘Judge Dredd’ (1995)

Image via Buena Vista Pictures

Judge Dredd, created by John Wagner and Carlos Ezquerra, is a satirical anti-hero in the British comic 2000 AD. In the dystopian future of Mega-City One, Dredd (Sylvester Stallone) acts as the ultimate law enforcer, a street judge with the power to arrest, sentence, and summarily execute criminals. His life changes when someone accuses him of a serious crime, forcing him to question the system he always trusted. As he looks into the accusations, Dredd discovers a conspiracy that involves powerful people who threaten the city’s future.

Despite being based on a well-loved comic book character, many fans were disappointed with the film. Critics said it focused too much on action and didn’t develop the characters or the world enough. Stallone’s portrayal of Judge Dredd divided opinions, as he missed many traits that made the character special in the comics. The result was a film that did not reach its full potential.

Advertisement

3

‘Lost in Space’ (1998)

Image via New Line Cinema

Lost in Space tells the story of the Robinson family, who go on a mission to help secure humanity’s future through space exploration. Led by Professor John Robinson (William Hurt), they board the Jupiter 2, expecting a well-planned journey. However, sabotage causes chaos. Stuck in an unknown part of space, the Robinsons must work together to survive while facing dangers, limited supplies, and rising tensions caused by Dr. Zachary Smith (Gary Oldman).

Even with a strong cast and a popular TV legacy, the film did not please anyone. Many believed that the visual effects overshadowed the story and characters, and made it hard to engage with the adventure. The screenplay also received criticism for its uneven tone and lack of excitement. Instead of becoming a successful revival of a beloved franchise, Lost in Space became known as one of the decade’s most forgettable sci-fi films.











Advertisement









































Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz
Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive?
The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars
Advertisement

Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you’d actually make it out of alive.

💊The Matrix

🔥Mad Max

🌧️Blade Runner

🏜️Dune

Advertisement

🚀Star Wars

Advertisement

01

You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do?
The first instinct is often the truest one.





Advertisement

02

In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely?
What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.





Advertisement

03

What kind of threat keeps you up at night?
Fear is useful data — if you’re honest about what you’re actually afraid of.





Advertisement

04

How do you deal with authority you don’t trust?
Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.





Advertisement

05

Which environment could you actually endure long-term?
Survival isn’t just tactical — it’s physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.





Advertisement

06

Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart?
The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.





Advertisement

07

Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all?
Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they’re actually made of.





Advertisement

08

What would actually make survival worth it?
Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.





Advertisement
Your Fate Has Been Calculated
You’d Survive In…

Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.

Advertisement


The Resistance, Zion

The Matrix

You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You’re a systems thinker who can’t help but notice the seams in things.

  • You’re drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
  • You’d find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines’ worst nightmare.
  • You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
  • The Matrix built an airtight prison. You’d be the one probing the walls for the door.

Advertisement


The Wasteland

Mad Max

The wasteland doesn’t reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That’s you.

  • You don’t need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
  • You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you’re good at all three.
  • You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
  • In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.

Advertisement


Los Angeles, 2049

Blade Runner

You’d survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.

  • You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
  • In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
  • You’re not a hero. But you’re not lost, either.
  • In Blade Runner’s world, that distinction is everything.

Advertisement


Arrakis

Dune

Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.

  • Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they’re survival tools.
  • You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
  • Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You’d learn its logic and earn its respect.
  • In time, you wouldn’t just survive Arrakis — you’d begin to reshape it.

Advertisement


A Galaxy Far, Far Away

Star Wars

The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn’t have it any other way.

  • You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
  • You’d gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire’s grip can be broken.
  • You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn’t something you’re capable of.
  • In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.
Advertisement

2

‘Wing Commander’ (1999)

Freddie Prinze Jr., Matthew Lillard, and Jurgen Prochnow in ‘Wing Commander’
Image via 20th Century Fox
Advertisement

Wing Commander tells the story of Christopher Blair (Freddie Prinze Jr.), a young pilot who joins the military to fight against the Kilrathi, an alien race that is threatening humanity. Blair wants to prove himself and takes on tougher missions while learning what it means to serve in the military. As the war heats up, there are reports that the Kilrathi have found Earth, which could change the entire outcome of the war. However, Blair and his fellow pilots must act fast to stop a possible attack.

Although the film is based on a popular video game series, it did not excite audiences as the games did. Weak acting, ordinary storytelling, and disappointing visual effects are major issues in this movie. The characters were not well-developed, and it was hard to care about them. Instead of providing a thrilling space adventure, Wing Commander became just another video game film that struggled to succeed.

1

‘Alien Resurrection’ (1997)

Image via 20th Century
Advertisement

Alien Resurrection takes place 200 years after Ellen Ripley’s (Sigourney Weaver) death, when Scientists clone her using genetic material from her blood. Their goal is to recover the alien queen embryo that was growing inside her before her death. Although the experiment succeeds, Ripley returns with unusual abilities that make her different from the woman she once was. Soon, a group of mercenaries arrives aboard the research vessel, and this failure allows the deadly creatures to escape, placing everyone in danger.

The film shows impressive visual effects and a strong performance by Sigourney Weaver. However, it was a disappointing sequel. The film lacked the suspense and atmosphere that made the earlier films memorable. The odd tone and questionable choices divided the audience, which makes it hard for the film to find its own identity. In the end, it became one of the most debated films in the Alien series.


Advertisement


Alien Resurrection


Advertisement

Release Date

November 26, 1997

Runtime

109 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Jean-Pierre Jeunet

Advertisement

Writers

Joss Whedon, Dan O’Bannon, Ronald Shusett

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Trending

Exit mobile version