Entertainment

8 Great Sci-Fi Movies That Just Don’t Make Sense

Published

on

Science fiction is a genre that’s tricky to get right. When done properly, these stories of space exploration, futuristic societies, and speculative technology can make for some of the most fascinating movies out there. It’s remarkably easy, however, for a sci-fi movie to make no sense. Perhaps its time travel plot is a bit too convoluted, or its world-building involves rules that defy traditional logic, or the director made use of elements of surrealism that are hard to get a grasp on.

Whatever the case, it’s still very much possible for a sci-fi movie to make no sense and still be absolutely phenomenal, and there are eight movies in particular that best demonstrate that. Sure, these films aren’t the kind of puzzle that you can put together in a way that’s fully and appropriately satisfying, but that may just be the whole point. After all, if there’s any genre that can easily earn the right to ask its audience to stretch the limits of their imagination, it’s science fiction.

Advertisement

‘Looper’ (2012)

Bruce Willis pointing a gun in a field in Looper
Image via TriStar Pictures

There’s a certain subgenre of science fiction that tends to have more than a few issues with logic, and that’s the time travel story. Case in point: Rian Johnson‘s Looper, where a hired gun learns that the mob wants to take him out by sending his future self back in time to assassinate him. The mere synopsis already brings up too many paradoxes for any one screenwriter to solve, so Johnson did something that some may consider clever and others may consider a cheap cop-out.

Looper pretty much admits that the rules of time travel make no sense and asks its audience to not think about it too closely. And frankly, one can only be grateful that it does, because that allows Johnson to focus on the nitty-gritty of the action and deliver a character-driven spectacle that shows science fiction at its most entertaining. In other words, enjoy Looper for what it is, and don’t concern yourself with making sense out of it.

Advertisement

‘Tokyo Gore Police’ (2008)

Image via Sony Pictures

Anyone who watches a movie called Tokyo Gore Police expecting anything less than a brutal bloodfest is a fool. One of the most underrated splatter movies of the 21st century, this sci-fi horror film is set in a futuristic Tokyo, where a young policewoman tracks down her father’s killer while battling against mutant rebels. The result of such a wild premise is definitely not for everyone, but for people who love gory and over-the-top sci-fi, it’s a must-see.

As you could imagine, Tokyo Gore Police is a ridiculous film that plays its cards in an entirely tongue-in-cheek way, and it never really takes itself seriously. As a result of its focus on camp and shock value, it doesn’t really spend any time trying to make any element of its narrative make any sort of sense. However, if you went into this movie expecting a serious drama that prioritizes logic over style, then that’s on you, honestly.

Advertisement

‘Southland Tales’ (2006)

Sarah Michelle Gellar and Dwayne Johnson in Southland Tales
Image via Universal Pictures

After he revived the midnight screening circuit of the cult cinema world in 2001, Richard Kelly followed things up with one of the most ambitious and divisive films of the 2000s, Southland Tales. Upon release, it split critics and performed atrociously at the box office, but in the years since, it has grown to become one of the biggest sci-fi cult classics of the era. But if there’s one thing that even the movie’s loyal cult following will admit, it’s that it makes next to no sense.

The narrative is bloated and chaotic, and Kelly develops a ton of ideas that don’t really mesh well together at first glance — or at second or at third. But patient and committed viewers will slowly be taken over by Southland Tales‘ unparalleled charm and fascinating vision of the future, captivated by a movie that often feels like a crazy fever dream you don’t really want to wake up from.











Advertisement









































Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz
Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive?
The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars
Advertisement

Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you’d actually make it out of alive.

💊The Matrix

🔥Mad Max

🌧️Blade Runner

🏜️Dune

Advertisement

🚀Star Wars

Advertisement

01

You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do?
The first instinct is often the truest one.





Advertisement

02

In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely?
What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.





Advertisement

03

What kind of threat keeps you up at night?
Fear is useful data — if you’re honest about what you’re actually afraid of.





Advertisement

04

How do you deal with authority you don’t trust?
Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.





Advertisement

05

Which environment could you actually endure long-term?
Survival isn’t just tactical — it’s physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.





Advertisement

06

Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart?
The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.





Advertisement

07

Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all?
Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they’re actually made of.





Advertisement

08

What would actually make survival worth it?
Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.





Advertisement
Your Fate Has Been Calculated
You’d Survive In…

Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.

Advertisement


The Resistance, Zion

The Matrix

You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You’re a systems thinker who can’t help but notice the seams in things.

  • You’re drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
  • You’d find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines’ worst nightmare.
  • You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
  • The Matrix built an airtight prison. You’d be the one probing the walls for the door.

Advertisement


The Wasteland

Mad Max

The wasteland doesn’t reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That’s you.

  • You don’t need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
  • You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you’re good at all three.
  • You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
  • In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.

Advertisement


Los Angeles, 2049

Blade Runner

You’d survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.

  • You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
  • In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
  • You’re not a hero. But you’re not lost, either.
  • In Blade Runner’s world, that distinction is everything.

Advertisement


Arrakis

Dune

Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.

  • Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they’re survival tools.
  • You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
  • Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You’d learn its logic and earn its respect.
  • In time, you wouldn’t just survive Arrakis — you’d begin to reshape it.

Advertisement


A Galaxy Far, Far Away

Star Wars

The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn’t have it any other way.

  • You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
  • You’d gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire’s grip can be broken.
  • You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn’t something you’re capable of.
  • In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.
Advertisement

‘Under the Skin’ (2013)

Scarlett Johansson looking at the distance with a sun glare in her face in Under the Skin
Image via A24
Advertisement

A24 has distributed some of the best mind-bending movies of the 21st century over its history, but there is arguably no outing in its filmography more masterfully confusing than Jonathan Glazer‘s Under the Skin. And like any surrealist, mind-bending masterpiece, this one has remained highly divisive as the years have passed. Nevertheless, it’s one of the boldest drama movies of the 21st century.

Glazer spent over a decade developing what would end up becoming Under the Skin, turning it from the effects-heavy concept that it was originally devised as into a more minimalistic story about the human condition. But while the film makes sense philosophically, it doesn’t really make all that much sense narratively. There’s nothing here that resembles the traditional understanding of plot or character work; Glazer instead favors an abstract and experimental nature over any sort of logic. This approach has cemented Under the Skin as a true modern classic, but it has also made it unapproachable for most mainstream audiences.

‘Interstellar’ (2014)

Ever since the start of Hollywood’s blockbuster era in the mid-’70s, the film industry has had several different kinds of blockbusters. The one who sits on the throne today is arguably Christopher Nolan. The question of what his best film is will inevitably elicit many different answers, but one is guaranteed to come up more than most: the emotionally stirring space opera Interstellar, which is one of those sci-fi movies that get better with every rewatch.

Advertisement

But though a few of Interstellar‘s mind-bending aspects definitely start making a little more sense as one revisits the story, there are other elements that simply don’t track. From the mechanics of the tesseract to the whole “love transcends time” theme, there are a few elements of Interstellar that demand quite a bit of suspension of disbelief in order for the whole movie to not fall apart. For all its commitment to being accurate to real-life physics, the film remains a piece of art that is, first and foremost, concerned with its narrative rather than with any genuine logic.

‘Brazil’ (1985)

Image via Universal Pictures

Terry Gilliam of Monty Python fame has a filmography that proves that the best comedies can often be the ones that make the least sense. Highly surrealist and with a uniquely absurdist sense of humor, Gilliam has made plenty of exceptional films over the course of his career, and Brazil might be the most acclaimed of the bunch. This satire of bureaucracy, capitalism, and technocracy has aged incredibly well, with its over-the-top, satirical tone even more resonant today than it was in 1985.

Advertisement

It’s one of the best sci-fi noir masterpieces ever, a scathing critique of the dehumanizing effects of industrial society and excessive bureaucracy that keeps revealing new angles to itself. But Gilliam intentionally designed Brazil to be a confusing, surreal, almost nightmarish experience, and he most definitely succeeded. It’s an outstanding movie, but not one that cares much about its audience making any sense of it.

‘Donnie Darko’ (2001)

Donnie Darko sitting in a movie theater
Image via Newmarket Films

Throughout the ’90s, the culture of the midnight movie lay dormant due to the boom of the home video market and cable television. It was a man called Richard Kelly who brought it back with one of the most notorious box office bombs of the 21st century, Donnie Darko. Its highly convoluted plot made it an instant cult classic that lent itself flawlessly to rewatches, and with the rise of DVD home viewing, the writing was on the wall for this becoming the next big thing on the cult film circuit.

Advertisement

With its thought-provoking narrative, Kelly’s enrapturing and deeply atmospheric direction, and one of the best movie soundtracks of all time, Donnie Darko has aged like fine wine through and through. But it’s impossible to deny that the main thing that made it a cult classic back in the 2000s is what still keeps it as a cult classic today: It’s the fact that it doesn’t make sense. Its mind-twisting narrative evades logic in ways that feel entirely intentional and brilliantly handled, making for a movie that makes rewatching and theorizing something that never gets old.

‘Stalker’ (1979)

Image via Goskino

Though his career was cut short by his death from lung cancer at the age of 54, Soviet auteur Andrei Tarkovsky has still managed to remain one of the most acclaimed and beloved European filmmakers in history. It’s a widely held belief that it was Stalker that contributed to his premature death, since it was shot in highly toxic environments that led many members of the cast and crew to contract different kinds of cancer in the years following the shoot. But the legacy that Tarkovsky left behind is an indelible one, and Stalker is one of the best sci-fi movies of the last 75 years.

Advertisement

That said, Stalker doesn’t really make much narrative or logical sense, but neither does the majority of Tarkovsky’s filmography. That’s because he was a filmmaker whose work audiences were meant to feel, not think, their way through, and Stalker is no different. Though its sci-fi elements are hugely creative and deeply powerful, they’re not the core of the story. Instead, it’s Tarkovsky’s potent exploration of faith and how it has evolved and faded in the modern world that serves as the beating heart of Stalker. Any sort of intellectual analysis of its plot is pointless because it is a masterpiece that proves that a sci-fi movie can make no sense and still be great.

Source link

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Trending

Exit mobile version