Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Entertainment

8 Worst Movies That Were Empty Rage Bait

Published

on

A close-up of Marilyn Monroe crying in Blonde.

Rage bait consists of online content deliberately produced to provoke anger, outrage, and scandal in order to generate high levels of engagement. It has become a massive pillar of Internet culture, and sadly, not even the movies have been able to steer clear of rage bait. Indeed, particularly in recent times (when online discourse has become an essential part of a film’s anticipation and reception), it has become increasingly common for studios to make and promote movies in such a way that it’s clear they’re trying to stir a passionate reaction in audiences.

Whether it’s a biopic humiliating a beloved actress, one of Disney’s many live-action recreations of their animated classics, or a sequel that destroys everything that its beloved predecessor stood for, there have been many ways in which filmmakers have engaged in clear rage bait over the years. These aren’t just movies that happened to be bad and happened to anger audiences as a result: They were movies clearly designed from the get-go to incite rage in order to be in the conversation.

Advertisement

8

‘Blonde’ (2022)

A close-up of Marilyn Monroe crying in Blonde.
A close-up of Marilyn Monroe crying in Blonde.
Image via Netflix

Marilyn Monroe was one of the biggest and brightest stars of Hollywood’s Golden Age, an immensely talented actress who still remains one of the era’s most beloved performers. She was also, however, a deeply tragic figure. Childhood trauma, mental health struggles, failed relationships, and notorious exploitation from the Hollywood studio systems all characterized her life. As a result, she’s become one of the most enigmatic and often-explored figures of the era across documentaries, books, movies, and the like. This leads us to Andrew Dominik‘s Blonde, based on Joyce Carol Oates‘ 2000 novel of the same name, a fictionalized account of the life and career of the actress.

In no way is Blonde celebratory or respectful of Monroe. Instead, it feels like a film that shamelessly humiliates her and manipulates her image, resulting in one of the worst rage-bait movies ever made. It’s posthumous tabloid trash in cinematic form, a drama clearly intended to stir up controversy in the way it distorts Monroe’s life with the excuse of being a “fictionalized account.” It’s time to let this beloved actress finally rest.

Advertisement

7

‘Snow White’ (2025)

Snow-White-gal-gadot Image via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Disney has been making live-action remakes of their beloved animated classics since the ’90s, but it was following the success of 2015’s Cinderella that the House of Mouse really started to turn this highly-criticized practice into a full-on business model. Disney live-action remakes have been getting lazier and lower-quality as the years have passed, culminating in what many would say is the worst one so far: Marc Webb‘s Snow White.

There are countless ways in which this remake failed the original, and that generated a storm of online hate that led the film to being one of the biggest box office flops in film history. From the controversial color-blind casting of Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot, to the CGI monstrosities that served as the story’s Seven Dwarfs, to the controversial marketing campaign that made it very clear this remake’s narrative wouldn’t stick very close to the original’s, everything about Snow White felt specifically engineered to generate controversy.

Advertisement

6

‘Mean Girls’ (2024)

Renee Rapp, Bebe Wood, and Avantika as The Plastics in Mean Girls
Renee Rapp, Bebe Wood, and Avantika as The Plastics in Mean Girls
Image via Paramount Pictures

2004’s Mean Girls is one of the most beloved comedies of the 2000s, a cult classic that has only gotten better with age. A stage rock musical adaptation of the movie premiered in 2017 to high critical acclaim, and that musical served as the basis of 2024’s Mean Girls. Directed by Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr. from a screenplay by Tina Fey, who wrote the original musical’s book, the film was met with a lukewarm reception from critics and a fiery swarm of hate from audiences.

The movie itself, though definitely considerably inferior to its predecessor and its source material alike, would have been fine enough by itself. What made it seem like shallow rage bait, however, was Paramount’s marketing strategy. The studio bafflingly decided to hide the fact that the film was a musical, and seeing as the Broadway version of the story isn’t exactly a universally-known sensation quite like the original film is, this meant that many viewers were met with an unpleasant surprise when they went to see 2024’s Mean Girls in theaters.

Advertisement

5

‘The Emoji Movie’ (2017)

A multi-expressional emoji embraces a disapproving hand emoji in 'The Emoji Movie'.
A multi-expressional emoji embraces a disapproving hand emoji in ‘The Emoji Movie’.
Image via Sony Pictures Releasing

The Emoji Movie is one of the worst animated movies of all time, and that’s an almost universally-agreed-upon consensus. It’s not just that it’s visually ugly, or too dumb for anyone over the age of four to find any enjoyment in, or so unfunny that it almost inflicts physical pain on its viewers. It’s the fact that a movie about emojis, corporate slop clearly made to get kids to beg their parents for a phone so they can play Candy Crush, was an entirely broken concept to begin with.

No kind of movie is more deserving of the label of “rage bait” than a cynical, lazy cash-grab with a pandering tone and some of the most shameless product placement of any major-studio film in Hollywood history. Somehow, The Emoji Movie‘s controversy-generating strategy worked: It was a significant box office success, though the years have allowed it to age as one of the most universally hated animated films in the medium’s history.

Advertisement

4

‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ (2024)

Throughout history, many movie franchises have taken a nosedive after the first movie. The Joker duology is one such franchise. Though definitely divisive, it’s an objective fact that the first film was a smash hit and a massive success, garnering 11 Academy Award nominations and becoming the highest-grossing R-rated movie ever at the time (a record since broken by Deadpool & Wolverine). Joker: Folie à Deux, on the other hand… much less of a success. That’s a nice way of saying that it was a total failure that massacred everything that its predecessor had done right.

If there is any pair of DC Comics characters who might have made sense as the stars of a campy jukebox musical on paper, it’s Joker and Harley Quinn. The problems here are that the hyper-pretentious Folie à Deux takes itself far too seriously to be campy, that the version of Gotham that Todd Phillips had built in Joker made zero sense as the setting for any kind of musical, and that the film very clearly made genuine efforts to get people’s feelings stirred up. In the end, this resulted in a major box office bomb.

3

‘Terrifier’ (2016)

David Howard Thornton as Art the Clown waving his bloody hands gleefully in Terrifier 2
David Howard Thornton as Art the Clown waving his bloody hands gleefully in Terrifier 2
Image Via Cinedigm
Advertisement

Nowadays, horror fans fondly think of the horrifying-yet-oddly-amusing Art the Clown as the face of 2020s slasher horror, but that was only after the success of Terrifier 2 and Terrifier 3. The character actually originated in a 2008 short film, and went on to serve as the main villain of his own feature in 2016’s Terrifier. Whereas its two sequels have been successful in expanding the story, world-building, and character work of the franchise in tons of interesting ways, the original Terrifier is just plainly atrocious.

Misogynistic, boring, awfully acted, visually ugly, full of poorly-executed gore, and with a script that feels like it’s barely a couple of pages long, this controversial splatter horror cult classic has nothing to offer beyond juvenile shock value. It’s a movie that seems like it was designed specifically to annoy, offend, and provoke people, and for the most part, it definitely had its desired effect.

2

‘365 Days’ Trilogy

Laura Biel and Massimo Torricelli about to kiss in 365 Days: This Day
Anna-Maria Sieklucka as Laura Biel and Michele Morrone as Massimo Torricelli about to kiss in 365 Days: This Day.
Image via Netflix
Advertisement

The erotic thriller genre is one that has produced a number of genuinely masterful films over the years. Netflix’s 365 Days movies aren’t among them. We’re talking about three of the most unwatchable drama movies in history, painfully un-sexy and un-erotic failures that misunderstood everything the genre should be so badly that it’s almost laughable—or it would be, if the movies weren’t so infuriatingly misogynistic from start to finish.

But that’s just the thing: 365 Days rage-baiting misogyny in no way feels incidental. Instead, it feels like the whole point of the trilogy. It’s so painfully obvious that these films were created to stir up controversy and invite hate-watching that it’s almost—the keyword here is once again “almost”—funny. They’re poorly made, amateurish in every sense imaginable, and an all-out affront on the cinematic art form.

1

‘A Serbian Film’ (2010)

A bloodied woman holding a gun in Serbian Film
A bloody woman in Serbian Film
Image via Unearthed Films
Advertisement

A Serbian Film is famous for being one of the most disturbing and traumatizing movies ever made. In fact, that’s the only thing it’s famous for. Using graphic violence and taboo subjects to criticize censorship in Serbia sounds like a smart and honorable enough concept on paper, but there’s definitely such a thing as “too far.” Director Srđan Spasojević goes light years beyond that blurry line, to the point that watching A Serbian Film doesn’t just take a strong stomach: It takes a bit of a masochistic attitude as well.

For a wide variety of reasons too grotesque and provocative to even name, A Serbian Film is one of those movies capable of disturbing pretty much anyone. It’s the quintessential rage-bait film par excellence, a movie made entirely and exclusively to generate controversy and provoke strong negative reactions not just in viewers, but in anyone even aware of the movie’s mere existence.































































Advertisement

Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

Advertisement

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

Advertisement

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





02

Advertisement

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





03

Advertisement

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





04

Advertisement

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





05

Advertisement

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





06

Advertisement

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





07

Advertisement

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





08

Advertisement

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





09

Advertisement

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





10

Advertisement

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…
Advertisement

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Parasite

Advertisement

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Everything Everywhere All at Once

Advertisement

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Oppenheimer

Advertisement

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Birdman

Advertisement

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement


A Serbian Film Movie Poster
Advertisement


A Serbian Film


Release Date
Advertisement

June 11, 2010

Runtime

104 Minutes

Advertisement

Director

Srđan Spasojević

Writers
Advertisement

Aleksandar Radivojević, Srđan Spasojević


Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

2026’s Best Movie So Far Is an Unusual Mystery With No Resolution

Published

on

Edik Beddoes in Blue Heron

Blue Heron isn’t a mystery in the traditional sense. There’s no crime to solve or murderers to apprehend. Instead, it examines a family slowly coming apart and a young girl who silently takes in everything around her — especially her older brother (Edik Beddoes), who seems like a ticking time bomb ready to explode at any moment.

Sounds like a drama, right? Well, Blue Heron is that, too. It’s a lot of things: a meditation on memory, a portrait of mental illness and the power of storytelling to piece together people and events from the past.

That’s what makes it the best 2026 movie I’ve seen so far this year. Small in scope but big in the emotions it conjures up inside you, it’s a deeply personal and technically superb film about how we can never really know our own family, especially the ones that fascinate and scare us the most.

What Is ‘Blue Heron’ About?

Edik Beddoes in Blue Heron

Edik Beddoes in Blue Heron
Janus Films

The first half of Blue Heron is set in the 1990s, as it follows a young family as they settle into their new home in British Columbia. Through the eyes of pre-teen daughter Sasha (Eylul Guven), we realize something is off with the oldest brother, Jeremy (Beddoes). Distant and mostly silent, he’s always walking behind everyone else and disobeying mom and dad’s orders. Gradually, a more unsettling portrait emerges: Jeremy has some psychological issues that the parents have tried to address, to no avail.

Advertisement
The Best Movies of 2025 Lead Frankenstein Superman Caught Stealing


Related: The Best Movies of 2025 According to Us: ‘Frankenstein’ and More

Sure, 2025 had plenty of incredible movies, but what about a best-of list filled with the films that actually kept Us talking — not just the ones making the most awards season noise? Don’t get Us wrong: Frankenstein, Hamnet, One Battle After Another and the rest of the other Oscar-buzz crowd absolutely deserve their moment, but sometimes […]

The second half of Blue Heron is set decades later, with a grown-up Sasha (Amy Zimmer) now working as a social worker. She’s still trying to solve the mystery of her brother’s behavior and understand the effect he had on her and the rest of her family. What happened to Jeremy? What caused him to act the way he did? And how did the family cope with someone who always seemed more like a stranger than a relative?

What Makes ‘Blue Heron’ 1 of 2026’s Best Movies So Far?

Eylul Guven in Blue Heron

Eylul Guven in Blue Heron
Janus Films

Writer and director Sophy Romvari answers some of these questions, but not all of them. One of the major points of Blue Heron is that some mysteries can never be fully explained, only dealt with, and that’s the case with Jeremy. All these years later, Sasha is still haunted by her brother’s behavior and how even he seemed like a prisoner in his own body.

I’ll be honest — I dreaded the moment this material would become sensationalized. We’ve seen young disturbed boys like Jeremy in mass media before, and they are almost always portrayed as villains or boogeymen who inevitably perform some kind of act of shocking violence, like a school shooting or a murder.

Advertisement

That’s not the case with Blue Heron, which is more interested in Jeremy’s behavior and his family’s reaction to it than in depicting what Jeremy actually does — if he does anything at all. It’s the possibility of violence that Jeremy poses, through his anti-social actions and his tossed-off threats that seem to come from nowhere, that sets everyone on edge and causes his mother and dad to seek professional help. But their therapist doesn’t really know anything either, and what they’re left with is a troubled child they love, but who could pose a danger to them and their other children.

Forgiving But Not Forgetting

In several interviews, Romvari has confessed that many aspects of Blue Heron are autobiographical. That makes sense when you watch it, as the film’s ambiguity has the power of truth behind it. Near the end of the film, adult Sasha confronts her memory of Jeremy head-on.

Nina Kiri in Undertone


Related: A24 Just Unleashed 2026’s Scariest Movie — Are You Ready for It?

When was the last time you were scared while watching a horror movie? And I mean really scared, the kind of freaked-out that stays with you long after the movie is over. A24’s new horror movie, Undertone, does just that. The Canadian film, out now in theaters nationwide, achieves what few other films in the […]

Advertisement

Through a sequence involving some fill-in-the-gaps narration and a simple edit, Romvari expands our knowledge of him and gives him a moment of grace and forgiveness. There’s more to Jeremy than Sasha, or the audience, will ever know, but what’s left behind is a portrait of a son, brother and boy who was just as much a victim of his own behavior as his family was.

Blue Heron is playing in theaters right now.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Stanley Tucci reacts to “The View” probing him on being 'sex symbol to gay men'

Published

on


“You’ve kind of become like a bona fide sex symbol,” Ana Navarro said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Blake Lively Hit With New Claims After Justin Baldoni Settlement

Published

on

Blake Lively at the Met Gala

Blake Lively’s legal war with Justin Baldoni may officially be settled, but the ugly public battle is still raging behind the scenes. 

Just days after both sides agreed to end their explosive courtroom showdown, Baldoni’s attorney launched fresh attacks against the actress, accusing her of avoiding trial because she was “scared” to testify under oath. 

The renewed back-and-forth has reignited public interest in the messy “It Ends With Us” fallout, with both camps now fighting over who actually walked away victorious.

Blake Lively at the Met Gala
Nancy Rivera/MEGA

Blake Lively is facing fresh criticism after Baldoni’s lawyer claimed the actress settled their legal dispute because she did not want to testify in court.

As The Blast reported, both parties reached a settlement Monday, ending their nearly two-year legal war just weeks before a May 18 trial was expected to begin.

Advertisement

However, Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, immediately challenged the idea that the agreement represented a win for Lively.

“Part of the reason Blake settled is because she was scared to take the witness stand at trial. She did not want to face cross examination by anyone because that would require her to tell the truth,” Freedman told TMZ.

The lawyer also questioned why the “Gossip Girl” star chose not to publicly fight the case in court if her goal was truly to stand up for victims.

“If she’s doing this for survivors of sexual assault and sexual harassment and retaliation as she says, then why don’t you take the stand at trial and prove it to the world?” he asked.

Advertisement

Freedman further argued that “A trial would have exposed her lies and the entire smear she was talking about in her interviews that she did.”

Blake Lively out in Bryant Park
MEGA

The courtroom battle took a major turn last month after a judge dismissed many of Lively’s claims, including several tied to sexual harassment allegations.

Freedman pointed directly to those setbacks while arguing Lively gained little from the settlement. The attorney claimed the actress “ended up with nothing” after suing Baldoni for $300 million.

“If this is a resounding victory, what does a defeat look like?” he added.

Blake Lively’s attorneys wasted little time responding to Freedman’s explosive comments following the settlement announcement. 

Advertisement

“I guess he’s no longer ‘ecstatic’ about the settlement,” her legal team told the outlet.

Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni Continue Trading Accusations

Justin Baldoni at Paley Festival presents: Jane the Virgin
Jaxon / MEGA

Lively and Baldoni may have reached a settlement, but both sides are still accusing each other of dishonesty.

Freedman claimed Lively “lied about telling Sony to destroy the dailies,” referring to footage connected to “It Ends With Us.” According to the lawyer, the Hollywood star’s testimony conflicted with an email from Sony executive Ange Giannetti.

He also accused Lively of misleading investigators regarding author Colleen Hoover. “She lied that she never told Colleen Hoover to unfollow Justin Baldoni. In her deposition, Colleen said Blake asked her to unfollow him,” Freedman stated.

The attorney insisted there were “more lies” beyond those allegations. Meanwhile, Lively’s attorneys released their own lengthy statement defending the actress and attacking Baldoni’s legal strategy.

Advertisement

“By agreeing to this settlement, and waiving their right to appeal, Justin Baldoni and every individual defendant now face personal liability for abusing the legal system to silence and intimidate Ms Lively,” the statement read per the Daily Mail.

The lawyers also pointed to language in the settlement acknowledging that Lively’s concerns “deserved to be heard.”

Blake Lively Departs GMA
MEGA

Blake Lively may have settled the main case, but the financial fight connected to the lawsuit is still ongoing.

The 38-year-old is reportedly seeking legal fees and damages tied to Baldoni’s failed $400 million defamation countersuit against her, Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times.

Court filings show Lively is also demanding “compensatory damages tripled, and punitive damages.”

Advertisement

Lively’s attorney, Michael Gottlieb, argued that California law protects people who publicly report sexual harassment claims.

He noted that California Civil Code Section 47.1 was specifically designed to ensure complainants can “share their experiences with courts, agencies, the press, and others without fear of suit.”

Judge Lewis Liman previously agreed with that argument when dismissing Baldoni’s defamation case last year. However, the director’s attorneys blasted the actress’s latest demands as excessive.

The legal team argued that forcing Baldoni to pay her costs would be “draconian.” According to Baldoni’s camp, he had every right to defend himself against Lively’s accusations.

Advertisement

Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni’s Film Became A Massive Hit

Lively and Baldoni’s ugly legal fight unfolded after the release of “It Ends With Us,” the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling novel.

The movie starred Lively as Lily Bloom, a flower shop owner whose relationship with Baldoni’s character, neurosurgeon Ryle Kincaid, eventually spirals into domestic violence.

Despite the controversy surrounding the actors, the movie became a major box office success. “It Ends With Us” grossed more than $351 million worldwide after its release.

Advertisement

In a joint statement announcing the settlement, both camps acknowledged the importance of the project itself. They described the film as a “source of pride” while also recognizing the difficult legal battle that followed behind the scenes.

The statement added that both parties hoped the agreement would “allow all involved to move forward constructively and in peace, including a respectful environment online.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless clash in fiery “First Take” reunion, a decade after last debate

Published

on


After five years together, Bayless left the ESPN show in 2016.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kim Kardashian’s BFF Reacts To Lewis Hamilton Marriage Talk

Published

on

Jonathan Cheban

Kim Kardashian’s whirlwind romance with Formula 1 superstar Lewis Hamilton is already sparking marriage speculation, and even her longtime best friend Jonathan Cheban can’t help but laugh about it. 

After the pair recently went public with their relationship following months of rumors, fans immediately began wondering whether Kim could be preparing for a fourth trip down the aisle. 

While Cheban clearly finds the idea entertaining, he also admitted the reality star and racing icon seem surprisingly perfect together.

Jonathan Cheban
2024 HPA / Hutchins Photo/Newscom/The Mega Agency

Kim Kardashian’s close friend Jonathan Cheban had a hilarious reaction when asked whether wedding bells could eventually ring for the reality mogul and Hamilton.

While attending Vulture’s Virtual Reality Masterminds celebration at The Lawn Club in New York, the 52-year-old reacted to the growing buzz surrounding Kim’s romance with the Formula One champion.

Advertisement

“Oh God, I will not go there,” Cheban joked to the Daily Mail when asked about the possibility of marriage. He added, “I’ve been through two. This is it. I’m stopping while I’m ahead.”

Even though he avoided making any bold predictions, Cheban made it clear he approves of the relationship. The reality TV personality, who also goes by Food God, described Kim and Hamilton as “a gorgeous couple.”

“They fit perfectly. They’re like a good yin and yang,” he said. Cheban added that he had met Hamilton before and immediately noticed similarities between the pair. “They’re both very cool. Very fashionable,” he shared.

Kim And Hamilton Finally Go Public

Lewis Hamilton at the F1 The Movie premiere
JOR/Capital Pictures / MEGA

Kim Kardashian and Lewis Hamilton recently took a major step in their romance by showing public affection for the first time. 

Earlier this week, the pair were photographed holding hands while leaving the Broadway play “The Fear Of 13,” starring Adrien Brody.

Advertisement

Although the couple has reportedly been dating for six months, the public display officially confirmed the relationship for many fans.

Kim and Hamilton have actually known each other for more than a decade, but insiders say things only became romantic late last year.

The pair reportedly spent New Year’s Eve together in Aspen alongside friends before taking multiple trips together in Europe. In February, they were spotted in the Cotswolds before traveling from the United Kingdom to Paris.

That same month, Kim and Hamilton also appeared side by side inside a VIP suite at the Super Bowl. Their romance continued to heat up in March, when they enjoyed a luxury getaway in Utah before traveling to Tokyo with Kim’s children.

Advertisement

The two have also been spotted at Coachella, shopping for furniture in Los Angeles, and paddleboarding in Malibu, where they were reportedly seen kissing and hugging.

Kim Kardashian Previously Admitted Marriage Still Feels Complicated

Kim Kardashian at the 2024 Met Gala
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Even with her new romance flourishing, Kim previously admitted she remains uncertain about ever getting married again.

The SKIMS founder opened up about relationships during a 2024 appearance on SiriusXM’s “This Life of Mine with James Corden.”

“There’ll be moods where I’m just like, ‘You know what? I understand my life is really big and I understand it takes a really, really, really special, unique person to want to deal with that,’” she explained.

The mother of four admitted that balancing fame, business, and motherhood can make relationships difficult. “I think my life is really fun and whoever comes in my life will have a really good time, but it’s a lot,” she said.

Advertisement

Kim also stressed that she does not feel lonely despite being single at the time. “I’m not lonely, so I’m good. I have my kids, I have work, I have my family, but it would be nice to share your life with someone,” the socialite shared. 

She added, “But when you do, it’s such a big [commitment], I don’t take that lightly.”

Kim has previously been married three times, including her headline-making 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries and her highly publicized relationship with Kanye West.

Kim Says Motherhood Changed Her Friendship With Cheban

Kim Kardashian at SNL 50
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Kim Kardashian and Jonathan Cheban may not be photographed together as often these days, but the longtime friends insist their bond remains strong.

Earlier this year, Kim addressed speculation about their friendship while appearing on her sister, Khloé Kardashian’s “Khloé in Wonder Land” podcast.

Advertisement

“I love Jonathan. We should call him,” Kim said, adding, “Jonathan and I are good. Here’s the thing, I had kids.” She admitted that motherhood dramatically changed her social life and friendships.

“It’s really hard to maintain friendships when you have kids and you’re like in it,” Kim explained. She also noted that Cheban’s lifestyle is completely different from her family-focused routine in Calabasas.

“Jonathan is not going to come and sit around Calabasas all day. He’s like always on the move,” she added. Khloé agreed, pointing out how difficult it can sometimes be for friendships to stay the same when people are living very different lives.

Kim Kardashian’s Friendship With Jonathan Cheban Still Stays Strong

Cheban later addressed the friendship rumors himself and insisted there has never been any real distance between him and Kim.

“People post me in things and people say that Kim and I aren’t friends anymore and it’s so funny to watch this stuff ’cause we are friends and we talk all the time,” Cheban told Us Weekly in March 2025.

Advertisement

The television personality said social media speculation often makes him laugh because their friendship continues privately even when cameras are not around.

“We’re going to be friends forever — and it’s fun,” he said. Cheban explained that Kim’s busy life as a mother and entrepreneur naturally limits how often they physically see each other.

“She’s got so many kids and so many things to do and I’m all the way on this coast,” he shared. Still, he revealed the two remain in constant contact, noting, “We talk all the time, and anything happens that I feel like we should discuss, we just send it right away.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Garcelle Beauvais Shares New Insight Into ‘RHOBH’ Exit

Published

on

Garcelle Beauvais posing on the red carpet.

Former “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” star Garcelle Beauvais is getting candid about her dramatic exit from the popular Bravo series. In a new interview, the “Coming to America” actress said she made the difficult decision after realizing she was in a position that no longer served her.

Garcelle Beauvais posing on the red carpet.
MEGA

Beauvais stopped by “The Today Show” in early May 2026 to promote her new Audible Original memoir, “Protecting My Peace… at All Costs.”

During her interview, the mother of three opened up about leaving the “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” in March 2025 after five years.

“A line was drawn for me that I no longer wanted to cross. I felt like my spirit could no longer do it. (It was) just drama for the sake of drama,” Beauvais told NBC host Savannah Sellers.

Advertisement

Beauvais announced her exit with a vulnerable video on Instagram, noting that her time on Bravo was a “wild ride,” according to a previous report from The Blast.

The “Jamie Foxx Show” alum added. “Some amazing things have happened, and some hard things have also happened, but it’s been a ride nevertheless.”

Garcelle Beauvais Talks Leaving ‘RHOBH’ In Her New Memoir

While Beavuais’ departure from the series was more than a year ago, she’s keeping things as real as she can in her new memoir.

Advertisement

“I realized something I couldn’t unsee. I didn’t have an ally. Not one. Not a single friend sitting on that stage with me. No one to lock eyes with, no one to lean toward. No one saying, ‘I see you,’” she said in her latest book released on May 7.

She added, “The same way I walked in is how I walked out. Alone. I didn’t wanna fight anymore. I didn’t wanna be a grown a, woman, a grandmother, going after other women.”

Garcelle Beauvais Didn’t ‘Connect’ With Anybody On ‘Real Housewives’ During Her Final Season

Garcelle Beauvais posing on the red carpet.
MEGA

Beauvais became even more candid in the publication, admitting that she was no longer connecting with her co-stars as she once had.

“And like I said (in my book), I felt like there wasn’t anybody there anymore that I connected with. And it was just time. I mean, ‘Housewives’ was never my last stop. I’ve done a lot of things prior to that and hope to do more afterward. But it was just time for me. It really was,” she said.

This isn’t the first time Beauvais has revealed that she felt like she was on an island while filming the final season of “RHOBH.” The Blast reported on Beauvais’ dramatic falling-out with her ex-friend, Sutton Stracke, who joined the cast at the same time as the iconic actress.

Advertisement

While speaking with Andy Cohen on “Watch What Happens Live,” Beauvais said she was “hurt” by Stracke’s lack of support during the season 14 reunion.

“Not only did she not have my back when she called, she never took accountability for it, and that hurt my feelings a lot,” Beauvais said.

Beauvais Has One Friend In This Socialite Turned Reality Star

Garcelle Beauvais posing on the red carpet.
MEGA

While she’s no longer on the show, Beauvais appears to have formed a lasting bond with one of the show’s recurring cast members, Kathy Hilton.

“I love and adore her. I called her, obviously, right when I walked off the set from the reunion and talked to her,” Hilton said about Beauvais’ departure.

Advertisement

Hilton went on to say that she actually met with Beauvais following the reunion; however, she refused to bring up the show “because I just want her to know that she’s very loved and will be missed.”

How Does Beauvais Feel About Her Exit Today?

Garcelle Beauvais posing on the red carpet.
MEGA

Being missed might not be enough for Beauvais to return, though. In December 2025, Beauvais said she’s been enjoying life since leaving the series and doesn’t know if she could see herself being back in the mix.

“You know, it was tough to be in that fishbowl. And I know the fandom is amazing, and everybody loves the show, and I took a lot away with me from it,” she said.

“But I’m also happy that I get to spend more time with my kids before they go off to college, and I get to do all these great creative things that I like to do,” she added.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kris Jenner Says Ozempic Left Her ‘Nauseous’

Published

on

Kris Jenner at Wizard Of Oz At Sphere World Premiere

Kris Jenner is finally addressing two of the biggest rumors surrounding her recent transformation. 

After months of speculation about Ozempic use and backlash over her facelift, the Kardashian matriarch is now speaking openly about both. 

During a candid podcast appearance, Jenner admitted she tried the trendy weight-loss medication before it exploded across Hollywood, but said the experience left her feeling ill. 

At the same time, she fiercely defended the plastic surgeon behind her dramatic new appearance while insisting she has zero regrets about her cosmetic choices.

Advertisement

Kris Jenner has officially confirmed she experimented with Ozempic long before the medication became one of Hollywood’s biggest obsessions.

The reality star first sparked rumors in 2023 after fans noticed her noticeably slimmer appearance during a vacation in Tuscany. Social media users immediately flooded the comments section with speculation about weight-loss injections.

For years, Jenner stayed silent about the rumors. However, during Tuesday’s episode of the “SHE MD” podcast, she finally admitted she had tried the medication.

Advertisement

“We tried it once when no one knew what it was,” Jenner revealed. The 70-year-old said the injections quickly became a problem because they made her feel “really sick” and “nauseous.”

After abandoning Ozempic, Jenner explained that she turned to other wellness methods instead. She said she now uses peptide injections and supplements, which she claims give her “more energy” and help her gain “an extra couple of hours every day.”

Jenner also stressed the importance of monitoring hormone health as women age, noting, “I get my blood drawn every three months just to keep my hormones balanced.”

Jenner Furiously Denies Facelift Regret Rumors

Advertisement

Kris Jenner is also shutting down reports claiming she regrets her facelift. The television personality recently faced rumors suggesting she was unhappy with the results of her expensive cosmetic procedure and believed the facelift had started “slipping.”

According to speculation, Jenner was allegedly considering another surgery despite working with celebrity plastic surgeon Dr. Steven M. Levine, often nicknamed the “facelift maestro.”

However, the reality TV star forcefully denied the claims while appearing on daughter Khloé Kardashian’s podcast, “Khloé in Wonderland.”

“Lately, it’s this headline about my facelift, which is really truly driving me crazy,” Jenner admitted, adding, “The headline right now is that I hate my facelift, and I’m really mad at… I’m furious at my doctor, Steven Levine, which couldn’t be further from the truth.”

Advertisement

She continued m, “It’s a flat-out lie. I love my facelift. I adore my doctor. I’m obsessed with him,” explaining that the entire purpose of the surgery was simply to refresh her appearance.

“The goal was to do a beautiful lift and give me a refresh and do a beautiful jawline, which I achieved,” she said. The Kardashian matriarch added that she normally ignores gossip, but felt compelled to defend Levine because the rumors were damaging his reputation.

Jenner Says She Does Not Need Public Approval

Kris Jenner at Wizard Of Oz At Sphere World Premiere
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Kris Jenner made it clear she has no interest in changing herself to satisfy critics.

During the podcast conversation, the momager insisted she feels completely comfortable with her appearance and no longer worries about public opinion.

“At 70 years old, I don’t really care what someone thinks of me. I don’t need anyone’s approval,” Jenner declared,” further noting, “I love my face. And I’m really okay with the way I look.”

Advertisement

Since undergoing the facelift, Jenner has confidently shown off her refreshed appearance during several major public events.

She attended the lavish wedding celebrations for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, where fans once again commented on her youthful appearance. 

The TV personality also turned heads during the Kardashian family’s annual holiday party alongside longtime boyfriend Corey Gamble.

Kris Jenner Reveals Secret ‘Password’ With Her Plastic Surgeon

In the past, Jenner has shared surprising behind-the-scenes details about her relationship with Dr. Levine.

During an appearance on the “Not Skinny But Not Fat” podcast in October, she revealed the surgeon initially wanted to avoid the publicity connected to her facelift.

Advertisement

“He didn’t want the attention, which I loved,” Jenner explained per the Daily Mail. She said she eventually asked whether she had permission to publicly reveal his identity.

In her words, “And he goes, ‘Listen, I’ll tell you what. As long as we can come up with a password so that if somebody calls and says, I’m Kris Jenner’s best friend, and can I have a consultation? They have to say the secret password.’”

Kris Jenner Explains Why She Openly Discusses Surgery

Kris Jenner Allegedly Said O.J. Simpson Threatened Nicole Brown Simpson
MEGA

Jenner has become increasingly open about discussing cosmetic procedures publicly. 

In an interview with Vogue Arabia last August, she explained that she decided it was time for another facelift after more than a decade.

“I had a facelift about 15 years ago, so it was time for a refresh,” she shared, adding that she decided to do the procedure because she wanted a better version for herself.

Advertisement

The socialite later revealed she intentionally chose to speak publicly about the surgery because she hoped it would encourage others not to feel ashamed.

She explained that being honest about cosmetic procedures could “inspire others not to be afraid of surgeries that you need that are necessary or even something you wanna do because you wanna feel better about yourself.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Peacock’s 9-Part ‘Narcos’ Meets ‘Ozark’ Crime Thriller Is an Instant Global Hit

Published

on

Shannon Gisela as Etta Tiger Jonze on M.I.A.

Combining the grittiness of popular streaming crime dramas and the addictiveness of telenovelas, Peacock’s new series seems to have attracted enough attention to debut on the streamer’s most-watched list. Now, it remains to be seen if the series strikes a chord with the audience and compels them to watch every episode. The nine-episode series hails from Bill Dubuque, best known for co-creating the hit Netflix crime drama Ozark, starring Jason Bateman, Laura Linney, and Julia Garner. Ozark ran for four seasons and concluded its run in 2022. Earlier this year, Dubuque created his follow-up show, His & Hers, which also aired on Netflix. Starring Jon Bernthal and Tessa Thompson, the series received positive reviews and topped the streamer’s viewership charts upon release.

Dubuque has now completed a hat trick with his latest series, which premiered on Peacock on May 7. It stars Shannon Gisela as a young woman who seeks revenge for the annihilation of her family, and charts a Scarface-like ascent to the top of Miami’s crime pyramid. The series also features Cary Elwes, Brittany Adebumola, and Danay Garcia. The series debuted to mostly positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, and is currently sitting at a 67% score. Viewers seem to be enjoying the series so far, describing it as a “fun ride” and “very good” in the audience review section of Rotten Tomatoes.

Advertisement





















































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz
Which Taylor Sheridan
Show Do You Belong In?

Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown

Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.

🤠Yellowstone

🛢️Landman

👑Tulsa King

Advertisement

⚖️Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

01

Where does your power come from?
In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.




Advertisement

02

Who do you put first, no matter what?
Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.




Advertisement

03

Someone crosses a line. How do you respond?
Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.




Advertisement

04

Where do you feel most in your element?
Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.




Advertisement

05

How do you feel about operating in the grey?
Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.




Advertisement

06

What are you actually fighting to hold onto?
Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.




Advertisement

07

How do you lead?
Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.




Advertisement

08

Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction?
Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.




Advertisement

09

What has your position cost you?
Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.




Advertisement

10

When it’s over, what do you want people to say?
Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.




Advertisement
Sheridan Has Spoken
You Belong In…

The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.

Advertisement

🤠
Yellowstone

🛢️
Landman

👑
Tulsa King

⚖️
Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.

You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.

Advertisement

You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.

You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Peacock’s Sweaty New Crime Drama Is Waiting to Be Binged

We’re talking about M.I.A. — the series finds itself at the intersection of Narcos and CSI: Miami, while also making an effort not to alienate female viewers. In her review, Collider’s Jessica Toomer praised the series for offering a “fresh take” on the popular crime drama genre and hailed Gisela’s central performance. She described M.I.A. as “a humid Miami noir built on a saturated Kodachrome palette and a Brian De Palma appetite for camp.” According to FlixPatrol, the series found a spot on the domestic Peacock top 10 list immediately after its debut, while also scoring a spot on the global Paramount+ leaderboard. On Peacock, it debuted at the number one spot, but on Paramount+, it was sandwiched at number three between Taylor Sheridan‘s Marshals, Yellowstone, and Tulsa King. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.


m-i-a-poster.jpg
Advertisement


Advertisement

Release Date

May 7, 2026

Network

Peacock

Advertisement

Showrunner

Karen Campbell

Advertisement

Directors

Alethea Jones, Benjamin Semanoff, Gwyneth Horder-Payton, John Dahl, Mairzee Almas

Writers
Advertisement

Bill Dubuque, Karen Campbell

Advertisement

Cast

  • Cast Placeholder Image

    Shannon Gisela

    Advertisement

    Etta Tiger Jonze

  • instar44715692.jpg

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

“The Fifth Element ”cast, then and now: See the stars of the cult classic nearly 30 years later

Published

on


Leaving no mystical stone unturned as we track the careers of the stars of the 1997 epic.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

West Wilson Slams Ciara Miller’s Jennifer Fessler Claim

Published

on

GettyImages-2267809036West-Wilson-Reacts-to-Ciara-Millers-Claim-He-Slept-With-Jennifer-Fessler.jpg

Summer House’s West Wilson is setting the record straight after Ciara Miller accused him of sleeping with Jennifer Fessler.

Ciara, 30, made the claim on Friday, May 8, after Real Housewives of New Jersey alum Jennifer, 57,  defended West amid his ongoing relationship dramas.

“[West] is the cutest, sweetest golden retriever puppy dog. He does not mean any harm. He didn’t mean it. He’s just trying to have a good time. He doesn’t wanna hurt anyone. Give him a break,” Jennifer said at Vulture’s The Masterminds of Reality TV event on Thursday. (Wilson, 31, caused controversy by hooking up with his costar Amanda Batula, 34, after previously dating her friend, Ciara.)

When the comments were posted via Threads, Ciara responded to Jennifer’s remarks by commenting, “Lol, because they slept together too.”

Advertisement

Taking to his Instagram Stories on Friday, West denied his ex’s accusations. He wrote “news to me” and tagged Jennifer alongside a popular meme that indicates confusion and facts not adding up.

A source close to West also hosed down the accusation, exclusively telling Us Weekly on Friday the claim was “absolutely not true.” The insider described Ciara’s comment as “such a silly allegation.”

After facing widespread speculation about their relationship, West and Amanda confirmed their romantic connection via a joint statement shared on March 31.

“We’ve seen the growing online speculation, so while this is still very new, we wanted to provide some clarity,” read the statement. “It was never our intention to purposely hide anything. Given the complicated relationship dynamics involved and the scrutiny that comes with being on a reality show, we needed a little space to process things privately before speaking on it.”

Advertisement
GettyImages-2267809036West-Wilson-Reacts-to-Ciara-Millers-Claim-He-Slept-With-Jennifer-Fessler.jpg

West Wilson.
(Photo by: Charles Sykes/Bravo via Getty Images)

 

The pair added that their platonic relationship evolved into something romantic over time.

“We’ve shown up for each other as friends over the years, through all the highs and lows, and what’s developed recently was the last thing either of us expected,” they continued. “Our connection grew out of a genuine, longstanding friendship, which made it especially important for us to approach this with care.”

The new romance came just two months after Amanda and her Summer House costar Kyle Cooke announced their split after four years of marriage.

“After much reflection, we have mutually and amicably decided to part ways as a couple,”  Amanda and Kyle wrote via an Instagram statement in January. “We share this with a heavy heart and kindly ask for your grace and support while we focus on our personal growth and healing.”

Meanwhile, Ciara shared her thoughts on West and Amanda’s budding relationship via an interview with Glamour published on April 17, revealing she had “less than 24 hours notice” before West and Amanda’s public statement was shared with the world.

“It’s one thing to experience hurt behind closed doors,” Ciara told the magazine. “To experience it so publicly is like another layer, and then to have to see what you thought was your life still play out in season 10. It’s a major mindf***.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025