Entertainment

Netflix’s Sci-Fi Thriller Accurately Predicted The Real Danger Of ChatGPT

Published

on

By Jonathan Klotz
| Published

Go to any streaming service’s sci-fi section and, within 10 seconds of browsing, you’ll realize that there are enough evil AI movies that you can watch one every day for a year and still have more to go. The most terrifying one has landed on Netflix.

Though it’s lacking the body count of a M3GAN, or even a Terminator movie, it shows that the real danger of AI isn’t physical, it’s emotional. 2014’sEx Machina is a cerebral thriller that will make you think, and by the time the credits roll, you’ll never look at ChatGPT or Gemini the same way again. 

She’s A Robot And That’s Ok

Alicia Vikander As Ava In Ex Machina

Future Star Wars co-stars Domhnall Gleeson and Oscar Isaac play, respectively,  tech employee Caleb and eccentric CEO Nathan. Caleb thinks he’s won a special trip out to Nathan’s compound for a week when he’s quickly informed that Nathan’s developed a new type of AI and wants Caleb to determine if she’s achieved true consciousness. Caleb knows that Ava, Alicia Vikander’s breakout role, isn’t real, but as the two bond over several conversations, he starts to have doubts. Even knowing the truth from the beginning, Caleb becomes enraptured by the feminine robot, and that’s when the real problems start. 

Ex Machina hit theaters years before AI chatbots became commonplace. In 2026, there are daily stories about someone becoming obsessed with their AI partner and either cutting off the rest of the world or doing something that they can’t come back from because a machine told them to do it. Turns out that Terminator, Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning, I, Robot, Tau, and countless others missed AI becoming a replacement for human companionship. Her came out a year before Ex Machina, and a decade later, those two are still the gold standards when it comes to the real, emotional cost of dealing with AI. 

The Type Of Smart Sci-Fi Studios Left Behind

From the moment it hit theaters, Ex Machina was a success, certified fresh on Rotten Tomatoes with a 92 percent critical rating and 86 percent audience rating. It’s a rare smart sci-fi during an era of visual spectacle. Written and directed by 28 Years Later’s writer Alex Garland, it’s far more visually stunning than a film that’s 90 percent dialogue has any right to be. Audiences couldn’t get enough of the philosophical musings, wild twists, and Oscar Isaac’s dance sequence. 

The sparse film was a hard sell in theaters with a limited release and then a rapid rollout nationwide. Earning only $37 million, barely twice its budget of $15 million, without taking marketing or theater cuts into account, Ex Machina was not a blockbuster. Instead, it benefited from word of mouth over the last decade. The rising profile of everyone involved in the film certainly helped it grow over time into, not even a cult classic, but a bona fide hit. 

Advertisement

Everyone involved in the film has gone on to further success: Gleeson and Isaac with Star Wars, Vikander with Tomb Raider, and even Sonoya Mizuno, who plays the silent housekeeper Kyoko, has appeared in multiple Garland films since. During that time, Ex Machina has only become more relevant, and as AI becomes more integrated into our daily lives, the siren call of machine companionship will become harder for people to ignore. 


Source link

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version