Ryan Gosling has made a rare remark about his love life with his wife, Eva Mendes.

The Oscar nominee and the former actress are usually private about their relationship, but Gosling recently switched things up when he brought her on stage as part of a surprise for her 52nd birthday.

Eva Mendes previously shared that she never wanted to have kids, but when she met Ryan Gosling, she had to reconsider her stance as she found herself wanting to have his children.

Ryan Gosling Makes Rare Confession About His Romance With Eva Mendes

Ryan Gosling gave a rare insight into his bedroom escapades with partner Eva Mendes during Wednesday’s episode of Travis and Jason Kelce’s “New Heights” podcast.

The “Barbie” star was asked if he makes love to the soundtrack from his movies, but he emphatically shared that he doesn’t.

It appears the host wanted to know if he shared something in common with his “Blade Runner 2049” co-star Harrison Ford, who confirmed to Jimmy Kimmel earlier this month that he had “of course” done this before.

“That’s an easy, easy no,” Gosling said, before Jason admitted he had asked a “dumb question,” while Travis couldn’t stop laughing.

The Golden Globe winner then said of his friend, “Of course, Harrison has [done that]. I always say, ‘Never meet your heroes unless they’re Harrison Ford.’ He’s as cool as you want him to be.”

Gosling then described a time on set when Ford “housed half a bottle of Advil as a joke,” adding that the 83-year-old is “not like us. He’s that guy. … He’s the real deal.”

The Actor Surprised Eva Mendes For Her Birthday

Gosling and Mendes have been together for more than a decade now, as they began dating in 2011 while filming “The Place Beyond the Pines.”

The couple has remained tight-lipped about their relationship and are rarely seen together since they got together. However, Gosling took it upon himself to break tradition to celebrate her 52nd birthday in a special way.

Earlier this month, the 45-year-old actor had Mendes brought out while filming “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” so that the audience could sing her a happy birthday song, per CNN.

Gosling was on the show to promote his new film “Project Hail Mary,” where he plays the role of a school teacher who lost his memory and woke up on a spaceship.

Eva Mendes Had ‘No Idea’ About The Surprise From Ryan Gosling

As a sweet tribute to the movie and his wife, Gosling had the audience filled with teachers and revealed that Mendes “loves teachers,” adding that she flaunts her Hall Monitor sash in their home.

As the actress walked up onto the stage, where she gave an impromptu speech, Fallon quipped that she had “no idea” that the surprise was going to happen.

“We owe so much to you guys,” Mendes told the audience of teachers, adding, “and you’re so underpaid!” prompting laughter from them.

The Actress Quit Her Career To Look After Their Daughters

The couple now shares two daughters, Esmeralda and Amada, but Mendes told Australian Nova 96.9 in a 2019 interview that she didn’t want children until she met Gosling.

“I never wanted babies before until I fell in love with Ryan, and it kind of worked out to where I was 40 and having my first baby,” she said at the time, per Page Six.

She also shared that she was always focused on her career, but when the “La La Land” actor later came into the picture, everything fell into place organically.

“I think I was 42 for the second [kid], so it worked out in that way that I had a career and then I changed my focus to my family,” she said.

Mendes has since slammed the brakes on her Hollywood career to raise their daughters.

Ryan Gosling Shares Update On His Desire To Play Ghost Rider

Meanwhile, Gosling is seemingly doubling down on his desire to play Ghost Rider in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The actor, who has previously said that he wants to be the new Ghost Rider, appeared on the “Happy Sad Confused” podcast to promote “Project Hail Mary,” and was asked by Josh Horowitz what the situation was with the MCU.

“We’ll keep hope alive”, he said. “Some discussions have been had. It’s a complicated situation.”

Sarah Paulson is in awe of how her longtime friend Amanda Peet summarized her recent cancer battle.

“My best friend, Amanda Peet … has written the most profoundly gorgeous essay about the loss of her parents, while dealing with a breast cancer diagnosis,” Paulson, 51, wrote via Instagram on Saturday, March 21. “@newyorkermag has published it today, and I’m screaming from the rooftops with joy. I hope you all take the time to read it.”

She continued, “If you are running around and doing other stuff, I did the audio recording and you can listen to me try to do the piece justice. My friend is a @newyorkermag essayist. How outrageously groovy is that? Bird, I love you beyond.”

Paulson subsequently inspired a number of her other famous friends to read Peet’s story.

Related: Amanda Peet Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis Amid Parents’ Hospice Care

Amanda Peet has been diagnosed with breast cancer. “For many years, I’ve been told that I have ‘dense’ and ‘busy’ breasts — not as a compliment but as a warning that they require extra monitoring,” Peet wrote in a New Yorker essay published Saturday, March 21, revealing she was diagnosed “last fall.” “I had been […]

“Going to read now!!” Naomi Watts wrote in the comments section, while Rose Byrne revealed that she already “read [the essay] this morning” and found the prose to be “so extraordinary.”

Ali Wentworth, for her part, added, “It’s a beautifully written piece. All too familiar. Give Amanda a huge hug for me!”

In her essay, Peet, 54, revealed that she was diagnosed with stage I breast cancer “last fall” while both her parents were in hospice care.

“For many years, I’ve been told that I have ‘dense’ and ‘busy’ breasts — not as a compliment but as a warning that they require extra monitoring,” the Your Friends and Neighbors star wrote. “I had been seeing a breast surgeon every six months for checkups. The Friday before Labor Day, I went for what I thought would be a routine scan.”

Peet’s physician subsequently told her that she “didn’t like the way something looked on the ultrasound” and requested that the actress undergo a biopsy. Two tumors, one of which was benign, were visible on one breast.

Related: Stars Who Beat Breast Cancer: Linda Evangelista, Cynthia Nixon and More

Advertisement

Many celebrities have spoken out about their personal battles with breast cancer over the years. Julia Louis-Dreyfus went public with her breast cancer diagnosis in September 2017 via Instagram. Nearly one year later, she had successfully beaten the illness and returned to work on Veep. “It sounds kind of corny, but there’s something about after […]

As Peet waited to find out what type of cancer she had, her parents were on their death beds.

“Our parents, long divorced, were both in hospice, on opposite coasts,” Peet recalled to the outlet, also referring to her sister. “Our mother’s had started in June, but our father’s was only a week in, so we hadn’t expected him to go first. I flew to New York. I didn’t make it before my father took his last breath, but I got to see his body before it was taken from his apartment.”

Peet returned home to Los Angeles, where she learned that her cancer was “hormone-receptor-positive” and “HER2-negative.” She received her first “clear scan” shortly before her mom’s death in January.

Actor Nicholas Brendon, who is best known for playing Xander Harris on all seven seasons of the original “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” series. According to a statement released by his family, the actor passed away from natural causes at the age of 54. He had been plagued by health issues in recent years, including a cardiac incident in 2022.

Nicholas Brendon’s Family Asks For Privacy After His Passing

On Friday, March 20, the late actor’s family confirmed his passing in a brief statement shared with The Hollywood Reporter.

“We are heartbroken to share the passing of our brother and son, Nicholas Brendon. He passed in his sleep of natural causes,” they wrote in a brief statement, going on to say: “Nicky loved to share his enthusiastic talent with his family, friends and fans. He was passionate, sensitive, and endlessly driven to create. Those who truly knew him understood that his art was one of the purest reflections of who he was.”

“While it’s no secret that Nicholas had struggles in the past, he was on medications and treatment to manage his diagnosis and he was optimistic about the future at the time of his passing,” they continued. “Our family asks for privacy during this time as we grieve his loss and celebrate the life of a man who lived with intensity, imagination, and heart.”

In the hours after the news broke, his “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” costars took to social media to pay tribute.

Sarah Michelle Gellar Mourns Nicholas Brendon’s Death With Poignant ‘Buffy’ Quote

Actress Sarah Michelle Gellar, who played the titular Buffy Summers, took to Instagram to pay tribute to her late costar with a quote that Xander said during the show’s seventh and final season.

“They’ll never know how tough it is to be the one who isn’t chosen. To live so near to the spotlight, and never step in it. But I know. I see more than anybody realizes, because nobody’s watching me,” she quoted.

“I saw you Nicky,” she added. “I know you are at peace, in that big rocking chair in the sky.”

Alyson Hannigan Also Pays Tribute With A ‘Buffy’ Photo

Similarly, Alyson Hannigan, who played the witchy Willow, took to Instagram to share a screenshot of Xander holding a crying Willow during one of the show’s most emotional episodes.

“My Sweet Nicky, thank you for years of laughter, love and Dodgers. I will think of you every time I see a rocking chair.  I love you. RIP,” she wrote alongside the photo.

Advertisement

David Boreanaz Also Pays Tribute To Nicholas Brendon

Actor David Boreanaz played the vampire Angel during the early seasons of “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” before moving to his own spin-off show, “Angel.”

In a lengthy caption, the “Bones” actor began by writing, “There are people you work with
and then there are people you share time with. Nick was the latter.”

He praised Nicholas Brendon as someone who “carried something real,” even though he wasn’t “perfect” or “polished” and noted how, in the entertainment industry, “that matters more than most things.”

“We don’t always get to choose how long someone stays in the story, only that they were here,” he wrote, concluding, “Some people leave a mark without trying.”

More ‘Buffy The Vampire Slayer’ Costars Pay Tribute

Emma Caulfield Ford, who played the demon turned Xander’s love interest, Anya Jenkins, took to her Instagram Stories to share a clip of the late actor giving an interview about the show’s final season.

In a text box placed over the photo, she wrote, “My heart is so heavy. I can’t put into words just yet how this has hit me.” She shared a clip of Brendon on the series, adding, “Let this clip of us giving it our all be a place holder. Rest Nicky. Rest. I love you.”

Advertisement

Charisma Carpenter, who played Cordelia Chase, a love interest of Xander on “Buffy” before moving over to “Angel,” also took to Instagram to share her condolences in a lengthy tribute.

“I will miss the version of the man I once knew – someone who was so warm and loving. He was cuddly, funny, silly, self-deprecating, and supremely talented. I loved every scene we had together back in the day. He always kept me on my toes, never delivering a line the same way twice, forcing me to become a better actor by listening,” she wrote alongside a carousel of photos of the two together.

“I will always remember him in my mind’s eye, in his trailer with the door wide open, in his rocking chair, smoking a cigarette and listening to music. From his trailer, which my window faced on the lot, I could hear all the bands that exemplify the 90s but are also, for me, tied up in the memory of Nicky,” she continued, listing bands like Creed, Alice in Chains, Green Day, and Nirvana.

“I miss those days and cling to those memories of him today. I offer my condolences to his family, his closest friends – who were with him to the end – and to the fans around the world who found comfort in his work,” she continued, adding, “May he be at peace now.”

Advertisement

We’ve all been in this situation before. You curl up on the coach, teeing up your favorite streaming service for a night of binging one of the classic crime shows from a bygone era. You settle in, popcorn and wine on deck, and press play, ready for a night of reliving nostalgia. Then, 30 minutes into the series, you begin to realize that the protagonist of your “classic” crime show is basically a walking HR nightmare, and you go searching for something that will be easier to watch.

This is the unfortunate fate of some of the shows that were once destined to become classics. Shows that once felt edgy and gritty now feel dated and problematic, according to today’s standards. Whether it’s the glorification of “cowboy” policing, or true-crime documentaries that feel more exploitative than groundbreaking, these crime shows didn’t age like a fine wine from Napa, but more like sour milk that sat on the porch for a week with the sun beaming down on it. So, let’s look at the shows that prove that “law and order” can sometimes become stale.

’24’ (2001–2014)

Image via FOX

In the 2000s, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland) was the man that protected America from the terrorists. Created by Joel Surnow and Robert Cochran, 24 premiered two months after the terrorist attacks of September 11th, and the show ushered in a new age for crime shows as it moved away from the “crime-of-the-week” formula in exchange for high-concept television that was high-stakes, and provided high-drama. Each season of 24 focused on a single day in which Bauer and the FBI must investigate and stop a terrorist attack on the homeland. Back in the 2000s, this was an exciting and genre-bending premise; however, the veneer of 24 has dulled greatly in recent years.

For starters, while 24 focused on terrorism as its central plot, it was often accused of glorifying torture and illegal government surveillance, the latter of which became an issue in real life with the public as the War on Terror dragged on. 24 is also not fondly looked on for the way it portrayed Muslim characters, often stereotyping them as terrorists, along with the fact that the series ran too long. After the fifth season, the quality of the show dropped substantially as its terrorist-heavy, post-9/11 themes began to grow stale among an audience that was clamoring for something fresher. While older viewers may still look at 24 as a groundbreaking series, to those who grew up after its peak, and even those who were around during its original run, its themes and tropes have certainly aged like curdled milk.

‘Cops’ (1989–Present)

Image via FOX

After the murder of George Floyd in the Summer of 2020, Americans began to re-think what they thought of law enforcement, both in how they interact with the public, and how they’re portrayed on television. This reckoning is what led to the cancellation of Cops, a longtime fixture of Saturday nights on Fox that was the vanguard of the reality TV genre. Born out of the writer’s strike of 1989, Cops became a hit among audiences with its portrayal of cops as they busted the bad guys and served their communities. The show blew open the notion that Saturday nights was a “death spot” in the TV lineup, and the action on the screen was often exciting.

But looking at the show from a modern lens, Cops was a very problematic show in which its high ratings help hide its poorly aged concepts. A large portion of the people profiled on the show were often people of color, who were highlighted as criminals who were the scourge of society. Cops also normalized police brutality, as the show framed violent arrests and the harsh treatment of suspects as justified, a thinking that changed dramatically after the death of numerous African American individuals at the hands of the police. While Cops was truly groundbreaking, kicking off the reality TV format that would only grow in subsequent years, Cops is nothing more than police propaganda in the face of other reality shows such as On Patrol Live, a similar show that shows police in real-time and gives a more honest look at policing.

‘Walker, Texas Ranger’ (1993–2001)

Image via CBS

This one hurts, as this author is a huge fan of Walker, Texas Ranger, and remains so to this day. However, while I’m still a huge fan of this crime procedural, even I can’t help but notice how poorly the show has aged. Inspired by the 1983 film Lone Wolf McQuade, the crime drama stars Chuck Norris as Cordell Walker, a member of the Texas Ranger who, along with his partner, James “Jimmy” Trivette (Clarence Gilyard), help solve crimes and bring criminals to justice in the Rangers’ Dallas-Fort Worth division. Airing in syndication, Walker, Texas Ranger became a hit among viewers during its initial run, and has maintained its popularity in the years after it left first-run status in 2001.

Having said that, there are a number of issues that have made this show age poorly. For starters, Walker, Texas Ranger feels very predictable, thanks to its “attack first, ask questions later” format that it followed with religion, with Cordell being portrayed as a “Super Ranger” with near impossible immunity to physical harm, even though he inflicted a lot of harm on criminals. Then there’s the production quality, which looked a bit campy even during its original run, but it’s even more obvious today. In many of the action scenes, you can clearly see Norris’ stunt double, and the many mistakes that are made, such as clearly-damaged cars repairing themselves in between scenes. While many longtime viewers could possibly get past those examples, what modern viewers can’t get past is how the show clearly justifies excessive policing, to the point that some viewers now view Walker, Texas Ranger as a “conservative law enforcement fantasy” that has aged the show quite poorly according to today’s standards.

‘CSI: Crime Scene Investigation’ (2000–2015)

Image via CBS

Back at the turn of the millennium, TV viewers were becoming increasingly interested in forensic science, especially when it came to solving cases. This was thanks to CBS’ highly stylistic crime procedural CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, a show that would go on to launch an entire franchise that would become the bedrock of the network’s crime procedural programming. The original CSI premiered in 2000, and took a different take on the typical crime series, focusing on a team of crime scene investigators who use physical evidence and forensic science to solve murders in Las Vegas. The science the CSI team used was high-tech and looked cool to viewers, with the show having an outsized effect on the real world use of forensic evidence.

The downside, now, is that a lot of what was portrayed in the original CSI was very inaccurate. The show drastically exaggerated the capabilities of forensic technicians, making them look like detectives when, in reality, they’re not. As aforementioned, the “CSI Effect” wound up having a negative impact on the judicial system in real life, with juries often demanding excessive forensic evidence for convictions, which was impossible to do. This was corrected in later versions of the franchise, but they couldn’t fix the tone and style of the original CSI, with its highly stylized nature aging the show rapidly in subsequent years.

‘Worst Roommate Ever’ (2022–Present)

Image via Netflix

Advertisement

For a show that premiered in 2022, Netflix’s true-crime documentary Worst Roommate Ever has surely aged poorly in its short stint on the streaming service. Directed by Domini Hofmann and Cynthia Childs, the series tells stories of roommates who turned the lives of their unsuspecting victims upside down. This is a show that would make one think twice about taking in a roommate, but it’s also garnered a lot of criticism for the way it tells its horror stories. While the show’s originally aim was to highlight how some people can hide their malevolent tendencies, Worst Roommate Ever feels less like a cautionary tale, and more like a show that uses the “bad roommate” dynamic for entertainment purposes.

When you watch an episode of Worst Roommate Ever, the first thing that stands out is how sensationalist the series feels, almost like the story an episode is telling is “hyped up” for shock and entertainment value. Using a sensational tone has rubbed some viewers the wrong way, with the tone being inappropriate given the nature of the crimes committed, which often ends in death and long-lasting trauma for the victims who endured it. Also, some feel as though the show’s title itself is misleading. While most people see a “bad roommate” as someone who doesn’t pay their fair share of bills on-time, or leaves their living space a mess, the people portrayed in Worst Roommate Ever are actual criminals that go beyond the “bad roommate” label. You don’t get a deeper understanding of how America’s legal system allows these situations to happen; instead, you get a crime documentary that’s focusing on “scaring” the viewer and nothing else, ensuring that Worst Roommate Ever will surely age like spoiled milk.

‘Hill Street Blues’ (1981–1987)

Image via NBC

Advertisement

There is zero doubt that the NBC police drama Hill Street Blues is a groundbreaking show that changed how crime shows were made. Created by Steven Bocho and Michael Kozoll, the series created the template for the modern prestige drama, with serialized storylines and overlapping dialogue now becoming a staple of modern day crime shows. However, as revolutionary as the series is, it hasn’t escaped the ravages of times, and there are a combination of things that have made Hill Street Blues age poorly when looked at from today’s cultural lens.

While TV culture was different in the 1980s, the way Hill Street Blues portrayed race and gender is very outdated, as people of color were often seen as criminals or the poor underclass, and casual sexism was the norm. Hill Street Blues also falls under the “Seinfeld is unfunny” phenomenon, in which the techniques that the series popularized have been refined and made better by other shows. Because of this, the show feels chaotic, derivative, and more of a product of its time instead of being the genre-changing series that it is. While it’s OK to still look at Hill Street Blues as a trailblazing crime series, its flaws have certainly made the series age more poorly than most people realize.

‘Law & Order’ (1990–Present)

As mentioned earlier, the cultural perception of law enforcement has changed significantly since the death of George Floyd in 2020, which wasn’t regulated to real world policing, but also to how it was portrayed on television. Suddenly, shows like the iconic Law & Order, created by the legendary Dick Wolf, weren’t looked at as a trailblazing crime series, but one with problematic elements that modern viewers simply can’t dismiss. Just to be clear, Law & Order helped advance the modern prestige crime drama Hill Street Blues brought into vogue in 1981. It was a series that focused on the totality of the justice system, from the detectives who investigate and arrest criminals, to the prosecutors who bring cases to trial, and it helped make Law & Order a powerhouse franchise for NBC.

But with the shifting cultural landscape policing, the cases looked at in Law & Order, which were pulled from existing headlines, don’t feel quite as satisfying as it once did. This is also thanks to how the show portrays the police, as the series is staunchly “pro police,” and portrays the detectives within the series as heroes, making the show feel less like entertainment and more like propaganda. This is not to say that Law & Order is a bad show, far from it; but being a fan also means pointing out its flaws, and the fact of the matter is that this is a show that certainly had flaws that have made it age less like wine and more like milk.

Advertisement

Law & Order

Advertisement

Release Date

September 13, 1990

Showrunner

Rick Eid

Advertisement

Directors

Constantine Makris, Edwin Sherin, Jace Alexander, David Platt, Matthew Penn, Martha Mitchell, Don Scardino, Christopher Misiano, Jean de Segonzac, Michael Pressman, Daniel Sackheim, Alex Chapple, Fred Berner, Fred Gerber, Gloria Muzio, James Frawley, Jim McKay, Vincent Misiano, Michael W. Watkins, Vern Gillum, Alex Hall, Dann Florek, Darnell Martin, David Grossman

Advertisement

• 
• 

  S. Epatha Merkerson

  Advertisement

  Lieutenant Anita Van Buren

Advertisement

Advertisement

Former “Real Housewives of New York” star Bethenny Frankel has broken her silence on the controversy surrounding Taylor Frankie Paul, “The Bachelorette,” and “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives.“

In a new video, Frankel, who has never been one to bite her tongue, seemed to slam Paul and her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen, for putting their minor children through a “toxic” cycle.

In her video, Frankel also praised ABC for cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette,” saying that other networks would love to have one of their stars embroiled in a scandal such as this.

Bethenny Frankel Breaks Her Silence On Taylor Frankie Paul Drama

In her video, Frankel, who spent years on reality TV, said there are two villains in the Paul and Mortensen situation and one victim: their minor child, Ever.

“The couple, who are in a toxic, self-fulfilling spiral, have subjected the child to this environment,” she said.

Advertisement

Frankel went on to say that she could understand if someone working four jobs chose to stay in a problematic relationship.

“But in any other situation, there is absolutely no excuse,” she added.

Frankel Comments On ABC Cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s Season Of ‘The Bachelorette’

Frankel then spoke about ABC’s decision to cancel the upcoming season of “The Bachelorette,” in which Paul was scheduled to star.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” the statement said, per The Blast.

Frankel said that ABC did “the right thing” by pulling the show, despite knowing the company could lose over $10 million in revenue.

Advertisement

The “Skinny Girl” founder said in her video that Paul’s situation would be “reality gold” on other networks. “This is reality gold,” she added before saying, “In fact, people are probably contemplating how to get her on their show.”

“So, don’t hate the player, hate the game,” she finished.

Taylor Frankie Paul Appears To Strike, Choke, And Throw Chairs At Her Ex-Boyfriend In Shocking Video

ABC’s decision to cancel Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” came after a video of her appearing to assault her ex, Mortensen, was shared online.

The clip shows Paul striking Mortensen, pulling his hair, and even throwing two metal chairs at him, one of which hit her daughter.

“This is called physical abuse. This is all you do,” Mortensen said in the video. “It’s the only thing you know how to do is hurt me. You think this is OK? It’s not OK. Holy sh-t.”

Advertisement

Mortensen And Paul Speak Out Following Heavy Week

Through her representative, Paul broke her silence on the situation and thanked ABC for their support.

“After years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm,” the rep said.

Mortensen called the situation “deeply upsetting” in a statement to PEOPLE. “I am, unfortunately, used to these baseless claims about me and our relationship, which I categorically deny. I am focusing on our son and his safety, and hope that Taylor will do the same,” he continued.

‘Bachelorette’ Conestants Told Contracts Would Remain In Place For A Year

According to a previous report from The Blast, ABC met with the majority of the men who filmed Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” to inform them that their contracts would remain in place for at least a year.

Advertisement

“All of the men were on the call with Warner Bros. except for the winner,” a source close to the show said. “The lawyers told them all their contracts will be in place for a year.”

The source shared that while the men’s season will not air on television, they will still be considered for future opportunities with the show and network, including “Bachelor in Paradise.”

TMZ recently reported that some of the contestants are considering a lawsuit against the network over its sudden decision to pull the show.

An insider told the outlet that some of the men uprooted their lives to film with the hope of gaining notoriety. Additionally, the source claimed some of the men believe ABC and Warner Bros placed them in harm’s way by filming with Paul, who has been arrested and charged with felony assault in the past.

Advertisement

Keith Urban has seemingly lost more than just his marriage over the past year. After nearly two decades with Nicole Kidman, the pair split in September over irreconcilable differences.

According to reports, his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with Nicole Kidman, have allegedly cut him off.

As part of their divorce agreement, Nicole Kidman was granted primary custody, with orders that the children spend over 300 days a year with her.

Keith Urban’s Kids Have Essentially Cut Him Off, Source Reveals

Since splitting from Nicole Kidman, Keith Urban has kept busy with his ongoing tour and appears to be coping well with the end of his marriage on the outside.

However, behind the scenes, he is said to be facing a difficult time with regard to his relationship with his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with the actress.

Earlier reports claimed there was a growing distance between him and his daughters, and the situation is now said to have worsened in recent weeks.

“The kids have essentially cut off contact with Keith,” a source told Rob Shuter’s #ShutterScoop. “This isn’t just about a quote — it’s been building for a while.”

Urban’s relationship with his daughters became strained following his split from Kidman, and while he has tried to remain patient for things to improve, he is now reportedly losing hope that they will.

“He’s putting on a brave face,” the source says. “But privately, he feels like he’s lost his daughters.”

The Singer Was ‘Really Hurt’ By His Daughter Not Acknowledging Him In A Recent Interview

While Keith Urban has been touring, his daughters have remained with Nicole Kidman, who has primary custody under their divorce agreement.

In recent weeks, the actress has appeared with them at events, highlighting the close bond they share.

This became even more apparent when Sunday Rose called Kidman her “biggest inspiration” and credited her as a “key part of everything” she does in a recent interview with an Australia-based outlet.

Despite Urban being a creative himself, there was little to no mention of him in the remarks from the 17-year-old, which, according to insiders, deeply stung the singer.

“Seeing it in black and white like that really hurt,” said a source, adding that Urban “feels erased.”

As for his relationship with his daughters, Urban is said to be uncomfortable with the current status quo but feels powerless as he “doesn’t know how to fix it.”

Sources Claim Nicole Kidman Didn’t Turn Her Kids Against Their Father

Previous speculation suggested that Kidman had turned the children against their father, but sources have refuted this, noting that the couple’s daughters are old enough to form their own understanding of the situation.

“Nicole hasn’t turned the kids on him; they’ve made their own choices about their dad,” an insider remarked, per the Daily Mail. “She isn’t like that. Keith hasn’t tried much to make things better in their eyes. The girls have always been very close with their mother. They are her everything.”

Meanwhile, regarding why the children appear upset with their father, it is believed to be linked to allegations that he played a role in inspiring the divorce.

“The girls are definitely Team Nicole – they’re in her corner, they’re hurt and angry on her behalf,” the insider claimed. “There’s some resentment against Keith. If they are blaming someone, it’s him, not her.”

Keith Urban Was Left Feeling ‘Betrayed’ By Nicole Kidman’s Closeness With Male Co-Star

Since their split, neither Kidman nor Urban has publicly debuted a new relationship.

However, the actress’s seemingly close relationship with her Scarpetta co-star, Simon Baker, has left Urban feeling “betrayed,” per Woman’s Day.

A source added that the singer is hoping the duo is “just hamming it up for headlines,” given their recent collaboration.

“Even then, it feels to him like it’s a betrayal because both Nicole and Simon know how much even the hint of a romance between them will hurt him.”

The Singer’s ‘Worst Nightmare’ Has Come True

The source also noted that Urban had long been aware of the growing bond between Kidman and Baker since filming.

The closeness, which has seemingly deepened since Kidman’s split from Urban, has reportedly left the singer feeling quite unhappy.

“He already suspected they were getting close while filming. This is his worst nightmare come true,” the insider noted.

They added, “He hates that they’re giving interviews about how close they are.”

In the wake of Taylor Sheridan‘s new neo-Western drama The Madison and his work producing the Yellowstone sequel series Marshals, there’s no better time to revisit his greatest installment in the Dutton saga. In case you were still under the impression that the Kevin Costner series is the best that Sheridan has to offer, let us redirect you to the first Yellowstone origin story: 1883. The 10-part Western miniseries is everything you could hope for in a gritty, Sheridan-style westward adventure — and it effortlessly rides laps around the other franchise installments.

‘1883’ Is a Brutal Western Miniseries That Pulls No Punches

From the opening shot, 1883 pulls no punches. This prequel isn’t some sugar-coated, mythic retelling of the American West, but rather a downright brutal depiction of what made the wild frontier so dangerous. The drama itself follows James (Tim McGraw) and Margaret Dutton (Faith Hill) as the pair aim to move their family, including daughter Elsa (Isabel May) and young son John (Audie Rick), to the northwest paradise of Oregon. Of course, they never quite make it that far, settling instead in the Montana lands that would become the permanent home for the Dutton family for generations. Chronicling the wagon train’s departure from Fort Worth, Texas, until it reaches Big Sky Country, 1883 is a masterclass in how to tell a sprawling Western tale with style and substance throughout.

The show’s impressive cast is part of why audiences continue to flock to the miniseries. Married duo and musicians Tim McGraw and Faith Hill are surprisingly effective as James and Margaret Dutton. 1883 emphasizes their acting ability to the max as their respective characters are put to the test again and again on this perilous journey to “a better life.” Joining them is Union Captain Shea Brennan, played by the genre staple Sam Elliott, and boy, does he deliver. While the three of them carry much of the miniseries, the rest of the ensemble, which includes Isabel May, LaMonica Garrett, Marc Rissmann, and Gratiela Brancusi, help add further weight and emotional attachment to these characters. Guest stars like Graham Greene, Rita Wilson, and Tom Hanks also elevate the material with their simple presence.

As far as the historical side of things goes, 1883 does its best to be as period-accurate as possible, though it isn’t afraid to trade minor details for more thrilling results. Case in point is Billy Bob Thornton‘s inclusion as Marshal Jim Courtright. Long before Thornton would headline Sheridan’s Landman, Courtright was the perfect role for the actor, though it’s a small departure from Courtright’s actual life experience in 1883. The same could be said for Hank’s General George Meade, who, though a real Civil War general, didn’t yet hold the rank that 1883 presents him with. Minor deviations aside, 1883 excels at bringing these historical figures to life with class — even Sheridan himself shows up as real-life historical rancher Charlie Goodnight.

Taylor Sheridan’s Original ‘Yellowstone’ Prequel Is His Television Triumph

If there’s one thing that’s clear about this Yellowstone prequel, it’s that 1883 works so marvelously because of its self-contained nature. Compared to Sheridan’s other television contributions, 1883 is a one-and-done event that effortlessly snapshots a moment in U.S. history. The Duttons we meet here don’t feel like extensions of the characters we know from Yellowstone, nor do the events of the series feel as if they need to continue beyond the 10 episodes we’re given. In many respects, it feels as if Sheridan had gone back to his American Frontier trilogy roots to tell a single tale that doesn’t spend time on recycled drama, dialogue, and overall thematic material. Like other Western miniseries epics such as Lonesome Dove or Into the West, 1883 is perfect as is, and can be enjoyed completely divorced from Yellowstone.

This is where the 1883 sequel (and Yellowstone‘s second prequel), 1923, falls somewhat short by comparison. Although it does well to highlight another generation of Duttons at a distinct period in Montana’s history, it struggles to hold interest on occasion as Sheridan unnecessarily prolongs the drama and repurposes tired Yellowstone-style land-grabbing plots into the main narrative, effectively erasing much of what made that two-season adventure unique compared to the flagship series. 1883 doesn’t fall into this trap. Its perfect length, rich characters, and clear Western plot make for a combination that is so easily bingeable that we can fully understand how (and why) it continues to dominate the charts.

1883 is available for streaming on Paramount+.