John Oliver’s dreams of being a soap opera star are coming true!

The British comedian, 49, announced on the Sunday, June 28, episode of HBO’s Last Week Tonight that he has booked gigs on both General Hospital and Days of Our Lives.

In March, Oliver appealed for a cameo on ABC’s long-running daytime soap General Hospital after discovering that ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith has played the recurring role of Brick for the past decade.

“When John Oliver publicly threw down the gauntlet and said he wanted to appear on a soap, we didn’t hesitate for a second. He was everything you’d hope he’d be: prepared, professional, funny and genuinely kind to everyone on set,” General Hospital executive producer Frank Valentini said in a statement to Variety. “He plays an integral character in the story, and I can’t wait for fans to see who he crosses paths within Port Charles.”

Related: Stars You Forgot Were on ‘General Hospital’: John Stamos and More

General Hospital has had numerous different cast members during its 60-year run, including some familiar faces. John Stamos got his start on the soap opera with his role as Blackie Parish from 1982 to 1984. Even though he starred on the show for only two years, Stamos has discussed the tremendous impact General Hospital had […]

“General Hospital was everything I hoped it would be. It’s a true honor to be a small stain on the history of this illustrious show,” Oliver quipped in a statement.

Oliver said on his show Sunday that he was “filled with scorching-hot jealousy” over Smith’s role on General Hospital.

“To be clear: Soap opera acting is not my Plan B,” the comedian said. “I simply offered my hypothetical acting abilities to any soap that would meet my terms, which were: I wanted to play a character with a ridiculous name, I wanted a juicy story line like murder or slapping and I wanted a dramatic close-up of my face.”

It seems both General Hospital and Days of Our Lives, the stalwart NBC/Peacock soap, answered Oliver’s call.

Advertisement

Related: ‘Days of Our Lives’ Cast Share Their Dream Guest Stars for Salem

After 60 years on the air, Days of Our Lives has seen its fair share of memorable stars in Salem. Married…With Children actress Christina Applegate appeared on the soap opera as a 3-month-old baby named Burt Grizell in 1972. Long before marrying Ashton Kutcher and starting a family of her own, Mila Kunis played a […]

“I am happy to say that I’ve already taped a week of episodes on Days of Our Lives, which is clearly a huge honor,” he said. “It’s been home to some of the most renowned soap opera actors like Deidre Hall, Susan Seaforth Hayes and John Aniston. It’s also featured guest appearances from legends like Dick Van Dyke, Betty White and now me.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Oliver will appear in three episodes of General Hospital airing July 2, 3 and 6. His Days of Our Lives episodes air on August 11, 12 and 14.

General Hospital first began airing in 1963 and follows the lives of the residents of the fictional city of Port Charles, New York.

Days of Our Lives, meanwhile, is set in the fictional city of Salem, Illinois, and premiered on NBC in 1965. In 2022, it moved to streaming service Peacock.

Alannah Keyser is speaking out after her unexpected exit from ‘Love Island USA.’ The Casa Amor bombshell addressed the controversy that led to her removal from the villa after a resurfaced video showed her using a racial slur while singing along to a song.

Related: It’s A Wrap! Alannah Keyser Exits ‘Love Island USA’ After Resurfaced Video Allegedly Showed Her Using Racial Slur

Alannah Keyser Apologizes Following Her Exit From ‘Love Island USA’

On Saturday, June 28, Alannah Keyser shared a TikTok video addressing the controversy for the first time. The 21-year-old Casa Amor bombshell apologized after a resurfaced video showed her saying the n-word while singing along to Roddy Ricch’s hit song, “The Box.”

“I’m sorry to whoever has seen that video and has been offended by it. That was never my intention. The video is from six years ago, and that word is just not in my vocabulary anymore,” she said.

Keyser went on to say she does not support racism or discrimination of any kind, adding that the controversy has been a learning lesson for her. She said discovering the resurfaced content while she was still in the villa “really broke my heart” and expressed disappointment that she didn’t have the opportunity to fully show viewers who she is.

“When I first found out that these things were going around online, it really broke my heart,” she said. “But this has definitely been a learning lesson for me, and it sucks that I didn’t get a chance to really show my personality and who I am.”

Before concluding her statement, Keyser also addressed what she described as “falsified” screenshots circulating online. She said the alleged messages do not reflect her character and denied discriminating against anyone on the basis of skin color.

Alannah Keyser Responds To Fan Speculation About Casa Amor Challenge

In the caption of her apology video, Keyser also addressed another topic that has fueled online discussion since her exit. Some viewers claimed she intentionally avoided kissing Casa Amor cast members KC, Sincere, and Corbin, all of whom are Black, during one of the show’s kissing challenges.

Responding to that speculation, Keyser suggested that viewers did not see the full picture. This, because of the way the series was edited.

“Remember that reality TV is HEAVILY edited & my chats/kisses with the other boys were unfortunately not aired,” she wrote.

Her comments quickly sparked another round of debate across social media, with many viewers continuing to question her actions on the show while others weighed in on her apology.

Social Media Reacts

The Shade Room Teens’ Instagram comment section quickly filled with reactions following Keyser’s statement.

Instagram user @biancaisking wrote, “Don’t apologize now”

Another Instagram user @_giigii wrote, “How about we all stop using the word so they don’t feel comfortable enough to do it 🤔”

While Instagram user @diamo0nddd_ wrote, “Bye, this is the worst fake apology I’ve ever seen”

Instagram user @__its_kel.3 wrote, “when you skipped Corbin, KC, and Sincere I knew something was up”

Another Instagram user @amari.makayla wrote, “why was it ever in your vocabulary ??”

While Instagram user @oy.quanintern wrote, Ur 2 mins of fame is over sweetheart I promise we don’t care 😂”

Instagram user @babuclipss wrote, “Her caption kinda shows her apology wasn’t genuine… why is her concern that the kisses & chats aren’t aired while addressing a slur.”

Another Instagram user @waveyy.tee wrote, “bye we saw you did not want them touching you”

While Instagram user @therealjust_us wrote, “As a black oerson, I don’t think that’s enough to get kicked off the show I’m sorry. Maybe I’m just a little too easy going though.”

Related: Marsai Martin Has Social Media Goin’ OFF After Sharing Her Hot Take On ‘Love Island USA’ (WATCH)

Brad Pitt seems to be having a change of heart when it comes to raising a family with his girlfriend, Ines de Ramon.

According to a new report, the movie star is open to having kids with the jewelry designer and is also considering marrying her, despite being left scarred by his divorce from his ex-wife, Angelina Jolie.

The update comes amid Brad Pitt’s ongoing estrangement from his six children, though sources recently shared that his son, Pax, remains in contact with the actor’s extended relatives.

According to Closer Online, Brad Pitt has not completely shut the door on marriage and having more kids, amid a blossoming romance with de Ramon.

Sources shared with the news outlet that he is quietly looking to the future with his partner, and is even considering tying the knot with her.

Reports had previously claimed that the actor had no intention to get hitched again due to his tumultuous split from his ex-wife, Angelina Jolie, their drawn-out divorce battle, and ongoing legal feud over their French winery, Château Miraval.

But Brad seems to be having a change of heart, with a source noting, “The legal system has been hell for Brad; he’s still paying the price for his divorce, so naturally that left a bad taste in his mouth. But he says he still believes in marriage and wants to marry Ines because it will make her happy.”

The Actor Is Open To Having A Baby With Ines de Ramon

Beyond marriage, Brad was also said to be over having more kids, especially considering his ongoing estrangement from the six children he shares with Angelina: Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Knox and Vivienne.

However, after living together with de Ramon for years now, sources claim that the actor is now open to having a baby.

“The one thing they don’t want to wait on, though, is having a child,” the insider noted. “They would love that to happen as soon as possible. Starting a family with Ines is the priority for Brad over a wedding, and she is happy with that. She is very much in love and says Brad will be a wonderful dad.”

The source added, “They’ve been together nearly four years now so it’s not as though things are moving especially fast. Everyone in his life agrees that it’s time to start getting serious about a baby if it’s going to happen.”

Although Pax Jolie-Pitt reportedly maintains little contact with his father, he remains connected to members of the actor’s extended family.

According to a source who spoke with Page Six, the 22-year-old recently attended a family gathering celebrating the engagement of his cousin, Sydney Pitt, to Archimede Jerome. The event reportedly included several of Brad’s relatives, including his sister, Julie Pitt Neal, niece Reagan Pitt, and other family members.

Sydney announced her engagement earlier this year on social media, sharing the news with followers alongside photos from the proposal. While sources claim Pax continues to maintain a relationship with relatives on his father’s side, they say “he doesn’t have much of a relationship with Brad” himself.

The report comes amid a broader shift within the Jolie-Pitt family, as several of Brad and Angelina’s children have moved away from using the “Pitt” surname.

Jolie-Pitt Children Continue Moving Away From Surname As Family Reflects On Life After Divorce

In 2024, Shiloh Jolie successfully petitioned to legally remove “Pitt” from her surname after turning 18. More recently, reports have also indicated that her younger brother, Knox Jolie, used the surname “Jolie” on his high school diploma following his graduation from Fusion Academy in Los Angeles.

Maddox and Zahara also recently took legal steps to drop “Pitt” from their name, while Vivienne notably used only her mother’s surname in the playbill for the musical adaptation, “The Outsiders.”

Pax, for his part, has somewhat distanced himself from his dad’s name by going by “Pax Jolie” professionally and has made multiple public appearances supporting his mother.

Most recently, he joined the “Maleficent” star, 51, and his sister Shiloh at the Supper+Feed Pickleball Invitational and Game Night in Los Angeles, where the family participated in charity activities and spent time together on the court.

Brad and Angelina finalized their lengthy divorce proceedings in December 2024, ending a legal battle that lasted more than eight years after Angelina first filed for divorce in September 2016.

Advertisement

While the family has largely kept details of their private lives out of the spotlight, Angelina recently opened up about the important role her children have played in helping her move forward.

Angelina Jolie Reveals She Nearly Quit Acting After Split From Brad Pitt

During a chat with Variety while promoting her movie, “Couture,” Angelina revealed that there was a period when she considered stepping away from acting altogether following her split from Brad.

However, she ultimately chose to continue working in front of the camera because it allowed her to remain close to her children while providing financial stability for the family.

Speaking candidly about that chapter of her life, the “Salt” actress explained that her original plan had been to focus primarily on directing and humanitarian work.

Instead, practical considerations led her back to acting, prompting her to seek projects that required only short periods away from home or allowed her children to travel with her.

Advertisement

“I was focusing on directing, and I thought I’d be doing my international work,” she recalled. “But then suddenly the only way to be home more and for short periods of time being away or to make a good amount of money was to go back to acting. I was only taking things that were short or close by, or I could take [my children].”

Right now, the former couple is locked in a heated legal battle over the sale of Angelina’s share in their French winery, Château Miraval, with Pitt recently scoring a major legal win against the actress.

Chloe Bailey is heading into the second half of 2026 with a fresh perspective and brand new look. At last night’s BET Awards, the “Do It” singer showed off her new, wavy blonde hair and revealed the surprising inspiration behind the sudden transformation. Also on the red carpet, the 27-year-old Georgia native opened up about her relationship with her sister, Halle Bailey, and her latest musical project, “Resurrection,” produced alongside music legend Timbaland.

Speaking with E! News on the red carpet, Bailey said her new look came after she decided to head into the next half of the year embracing whatever comes her way. “I’m just tired of being so serious about everything,” she said.

So, what inspired her to go bleach blonde? Comic books! “… I’ve been reading more comic books, and I just love how sexy and feminine and colorful the superheroes are in there,” Chloe said, adding that sticking with one look is “boring.”

Regarding her favorite comic characters, the “Swarm” actress said she’s moved by “Wonder Woman, Storm, and Thor.”

Chloe Bailey Opens Up About Working With Her Sister, Halle Bailey, On The BET Awards Red Carpet

Later, Chloe spoke candidly about her working relationship with her sister, Halle Bailey, who recently starred in Disney’s “The Little Mermaid” and the romance comedy film “You, Me & Tuscany.”

Chloe, meanwhile, just starred in Peacock’s original film, “Strung,” which features Lynn Whitfield and Coco Jones. The film tells the story of a young violinist who takes a private tutoring job for a rich family, later discovers dark secrets, and becomes entangled in a web of lies and violence.

Regarding their careers, Chloe said she’s super “proud” of them both, adding that they’re “living out our dreams” and “breaking barriers” in the entertainment industry. She added, “… making history with the things that we are doing is pretty cool.”

And while she’s not finished yet, Chloe said that she’s grateful to be doing it alongside her younger sister.

Chloe Bailey Gets Real About Her Return To Music After Her 2024 Album

As the conversation continued, Chloe touched on her music ventures, specifically her latest mixtape with Timbaland, “Resurrection.”

The 13-track collaborative project was released on Juneteenth 2026 and features a mix of R&B and dance hits. It’s the singer’s first release since her 2024 album, “Trouble in Paradise.”

“It feels amazing to be back,” Chloe said. “It’s like a new rebirth, and I’m happy everyone is receiving the mixtape so well. I can’t wait for them to hear what else I have in store.”

How Has Acting Helped Chloe Become A Better Artist?

According to a previous report from The Blast, Chloe credited her venture into acting over the last few years with making her a better artist, saying that being “raw and vulnerable” in front of the camera translates to her work in the booth.

“You have to be raw and vulnerable, and you have to let your guard down. And with music, it’s all about performing, putting on a show. And that’s what I’ve always been used to. So right now my next goal is to [tell a story] better. But I feel like acting is getting me there more and more because you tell the story of someone else that has nothing to do with you. And there’s beauty in the rawness,” she said.

Chloe’s New Mixtape Is Meant To Celebrate ‘Community And Power’

Chloe explained that her latest project wasn’t something she released just for fun. The project, released under Beyoncé’s Parkwood Entertainment label, was created with intention and designed to represent “power” within the Black community.

“I created this mixtape with Timberland… and we’re releasing it on Juneteenth! It’s a celebration of the beauty within our community and our power that we hold within our skin, but also he has been such a prominent figure within the music industry,” she said. “And I’ve been so inspired by him and Missy Elliott. Like I’ve never been shy of crediting them for the producer that I am.”

Advertisement

Why does it seem like Hollywood is suddenly having a huge estate sale? All of these legacy studios are suddenly like lost toys. Like Woody being left behind and put on the shelf with Wheezy, it’s time for a change, clearly. Following the gigantic battle for Warner Bros. over the last 12 months, it seems like another major name may be putting up the for sale signs.

Comcast has announced plans to separate NBCUniversal and Sky into a new publicly traded company, and in doing so, carving out one of Hollywood’s biggest content empires from its broadband and wireless business. The new company will include Universal’s movie studio and theme parks, Peacock, NBC, Telemundo, Bravo, and Sky. Comcast has estimated that, pending regulatory approval, the whole process should take around a year and they are of the belief that the standalong business will have the freedom to pursue growth on its own two legs.

At least, that’s the party line because the bigger picture is simpler: Comcast is carving up its assets during a buying period, when deep-pocketed buyers are looking everywhere for entertainment companies to add to their rapidly expanding portfolios.

Why is Comcast Splitting Up?

Comcast’s move would turn the parent company into a more streamlined broadband and wireless business, while the newly separated NBCUniversal would become one of the largest pure-play content companies in the world. It also gives potential buyers a much clearer target, combining film, television, streaming, broadcast networks, theme parks, and European media under one roof.

The company said current co-CEO Mike Cavanagh will become CEO of the new NBCUniversal business, while former Comcast chief financial officer Michael Angelakis will return to lead the future Comcast after the split. Brian Roberts and the Roberts family will retain control and remain involved with both companies. In a statement, Cavanagh said:

“Both companies begin this next chapter from positions of strength. Comcast will continue to build on its leadership in connectivity, while NBCUniversal, together with Sky, will have the scale, brands, content and financial resources to compete as a premier global media and entertainment company. Each organization will continue to be led by a management team with deep industry experience that will benefit from focused strategic priorities and the ability to pursue opportunities most relevant to their businesses. I’m personally thrilled to continue leading NBCUniversal into the future. With our iconic brands and theme parks, leading franchises and incredible creative talent, we are well-positioned for long-term value creation.”

Comcast is expected to complete the NBCUniversal and Sky spinoff in around a year.

Roommates, when Blueface started trending again, nobody expected the conversation to loop back to Chrisean Rock. And it’s got the internet doing double takes — and rewatching clips frame by frame. What looked like a peaceful outing, a stroller, and what appeared to be the former couple sparked questions. But it doesn’t look like Blueface was here for it.

RELATED: Karlissa Weighs In As Chrisean Rock Discusses Blueface Being “Madly In Love” With Her And Their Co-Parenting Struggles (VIDEO)

Wack 100 Clears The Air On Viral Blueface & Chrisean Clip

The footage in question spread quickly online, showing what appeared to be Blueface and Chrisean walking together with a stroller during a seemingly family-style outing. Given the pair’s highly publicized and often turbulent history, social media immediately ran with speculation that the two might be back together or co-parenting in a more unified way. But according to Blueface’s manager, Wack 100, what fans thought they saw wasn’t real at all.

In footage obtained by Live Bitez, Wack 100 shut down the rumors, claiming the viral clip was actually AI-generated. “Y’all seen that AI, right? Sh*t was crazy,” he said, dismissing the footage and insisting it was digitally altered. He went on to explain that the logistics alone made the scenario unlikely. He also noted that the travel timing and circumstances that wouldn’t align with the video’s supposed Catalina Island setting.

Blueface Clears The Air On Viral Chrisean Clip

Wack doubled down, saying Blueface physically couldn’t have been in the location at the time being suggested, adding that the timeline simply didn’t add up.

“They’re talking about [Blueface and Rock] are in Catalina. It would’ve took him an hour and a half to get to Long Beach. Wait on the flight…ain’t no way,” he claimed. “If you’d have took the boat, that’s even longer. He would’ve been forced to go on the boat, ’cause he had the baby.”

Blueface himself later appeared during the livestream and echoed the same sentiment, confirming the footage wasn’t real and claiming even the outfit shown had been replicated through AI manipulation. “Yeah, that was AI,” the rapper shared. He also joked that he had to clarify the situation to his current partner, Nevaeh, adding, “They put the same clothes I had on today in the AI.”

The Internet Has A Lot To Say

One Instagram user @pretty_lady_42__ said, “When your best friend trying to take up for you, but he still messed up…😂😂😂”

This Instagram user @randomishvibes2 added, “…wack knows it’s real and Blueface obviously but ppl use that line when they didn’t expect to get caught in 4k🤷🏽‍♀️”

And, Instagram user @mrs_deviney wrote, “Them MaloneS walk just alike. Ain’t no damage AI 😂”

Meanwhile, Instagram user @early2000smemetimemachine claimed, “Chrisean calling the probation officer as we speak. 😂”

While Instagram user @ms.empressssss shared, “Not they AI’d blueface with the stroller 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂”

Then Instagram user @eddyxcx24 claimed, “Y’all love to lie because blue said that was his cousin now it ai 😂😂😂”

Lastly, Instagram user @neek_domi joked, “Someone in these comments said ‘they think we nincompoops’ 😂”

RELATED: Grandma Don’t Play! Karlissa Saffold Harvey Addresses Viral Video Of Her Disciplining Blueface’s Daughter (PHOTO)

A great adaptation doesn’t always have to be a faithful adaptation. While audiences often judge movies based on how closely they follow their source material, films and novels are fundamentally different mediums. Some filmmakers choose to preserve every major plot point, while others take dramatic liberties, often for the better.

While this understandably frustrates many readers, it’s also frequently the correct move, sometimes even ensuring that the film is superior to the book it was based on. With that in mind, this list looks at some movies that were not very faithful to their original novels, yet still work well as films.

‘Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix’ (2007)

Image via Warner Bros./courtesy Everett Collection

“You’re the weak one. And you’ll never know love or friendship. And I feel sorry for you.” Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix follows Harry’s (Daniel Radcliffe) fifth year at Hogwarts as he struggles with the return of Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), increasing hostility from the Ministry of Magic, and the arrival of the tyrannical Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton). It’s the longest book in the series, clocking in at a whopping 766 pages, and yet it’s the shortest movie, meaning that countless scenes and subplots were cut.

For instance, the film leaves out the visit to St. Mungo’s hospital, Neville’s expanded role, Grawp’s larger storyline, the Occlumency lessons, Harry’s relationship with Cho, the full extent of the Department of the Mysteries, and even a proper explanation of the prophecy itself. Nevertheless, the movie is still entertaining and briskly paced, culminating in one of the franchise’s most intense finales.

‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’ (1988)

Image via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“I’m not bad. I’m just drawn that way.” This ’80s classic follows private detective Eddie Valiant (Bob Hoskins) as he investigates a murder involving the famous cartoon rabbit Roger Rabbit (voiced by Charles Fleischer). In the process, Eddie discovers a conspiracy that threatens both the human and cartoon worlds. At first glance, Who Framed Roger Rabbit appears to be a straightforward adaptation of Gary K. Wolf‘s novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit? In reality, the film changes so much that it is essentially a completely different story.

The novel features comic-strip characters rather than animated cartoon stars, employs an entirely different mystery, focuses more on censorship, and shares little more than a handful of character names with the finished movie. All of Robert Zemeckis’ changes were for the better. The groundbreaking combination of live-action and animation still looks astonishing decades later, while the noir-inspired mystery provides a surprisingly sophisticated narrative foundation.

‘World War Z’ (2013)

Image via Jaap Buitendijk/©Paramount Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection

“Movement is life.” Creating an entertaining new spin on zombie tropes is tough, but director Marc Forster pulled it off with World War Z. Nevertheless, it’s striking how much the film diverges from the source material. Max Brooks‘ novel is structured as an oral history of a global zombie war, consisting of interviews with survivors from around the world. It focuses on politics, military strategy, and the social consequences of catastrophe rather than a single protagonist. The film abandons that structure entirely.

Instead, it follows former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) as he travels across the globe searching for a way to stop a rapidly spreading zombie pandemic that threatens humanity’s survival. As an adaptation, the movie discards much of what made the book distinctive. Many readers were understandably disappointed that the film retained little beyond the title and basic zombie premise.

‘Howl’s Moving Castle’ (2004)

Image via Studio Ghibli

“A heart’s a heavy burden.” This Miyazaki gem tells the story of Sophie (voiced by Chieko Baisho), a young woman who is transformed into an elderly woman by a witch’s curse. Seeking a way to break the spell, she encounters the mysterious wizard Howl (Takuya Kimura) and becomes involved in a magical conflict that threatens an entire kingdom. The movie is a classic in its own way, very much fitting within its creator’s signature aesthetic, though it does change a lot from Diana Wynne Jones‘ novel.

Many plot details are altered, several character arcs are simplified, and Miyazaki introduces entirely new political and anti-war elements that are largely absent from the book. Overall, where the novel focuses more on clever plotting, colorful magic, and the chemistry between Sophie and Howl, the film is more lyrical, using the fantasy setting to explore war, pacifism, love, and personal transformation.

‘Children of Men’ (2006)

Image via Universal Pictures

“As the sound of the playgrounds faded, the despair set in.” Set in a future where humanity has become infertile and no children have been born for nearly two decades, Children of Men follows disillusioned bureaucrat Theo Faron (Clive Owen) as he becomes responsible for protecting a young woman (Clare-Hope Ashitey) who may hold the key to humanity’s survival. The film is based on P.D. James‘ novel, but director Alfonso Cuarón makes sweeping changes to the story.

Indeed, while the two versions begin with the same premise, they quickly take it in different directions. Where the novel revolves around political intrigue and philosophical debates about power, the movie leans into its identity as a survival thriller focused on escorting one pregnant woman to safety through a collapsing society. In this regard, most of the film’s major events were created specifically for the adaptation.

‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’ (1961)

Image via Paramount Pictures

“Anybody who ever gave you confidence, you owe them a lot.” Here’s a beloved movie adaptation that the original author famously disliked. In Breakfast at Tiffany’s, struggling writer Paul Varjak (George Peppard) becomes fascinated by his eccentric neighbor, Holly Golightly (a peak-stardom Audrey Hepburn), a charming socialite drifting through New York City in search of wealth, stability, and belonging. Their friendship deepens, and both characters are forced to confront uncomfortable truths about themselves and their futures.

The movie was adapted from a novella by Truman Capote, author of In Cold Blood. His version is darker, more ambiguous, and considerably less romantic. Holly herself is a more complicated and morally ambiguous figure, something that the producers clearly felt wouldn’t go down well with mainstream movie audiences. The original ending, in particular, is bittersweet and unresolved, while in the film it’s a happy one.

‘The Silence of the Lambs’ (1991)

Image via Orion Pictures

“A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.” Jodie Foster turns in one of her strongest performances here as FBI trainee Clarice Starling, who seeks the help of imprisoned serial killer Hannibal Lecter (a brilliant Anthony Hopkins) in order to catch another murderer known as Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine). Jonathan Demme crafts this setup into one of the smartest and most stylish horror-thrillers of all time.

Compared to many entries on this list, the Silence of the Lambs movie is relatively faithful. However, it still simplifies and streamlines aspects of the book, reducing some of its procedural detail and internal character development. The novel delves deeper into the characters’ backstories and gives us a front-row seat to their thoughts, something a movie obviously can’t really do. Fortunately, the performances are strong enough to compensate.

‘Blade Runner’ (1982)

Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

Advertisement

“It’s too bad she won’t live. But then again, who does?” Blade Runner features Harrison Ford as Rick Deckard, a former police officer tasked with hunting down escaped replicants, bioengineered beings nearly indistinguishable from humans. But as Deckard tracks his targets through a rain-soaked futuristic Los Angeles, he begins questioning the nature of humanity and his own place within the world. This tale was based on Philip K. Dick‘s groundbreaking novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, though Ridley Scott very much puts his own stamp on it.

The world-building is very different in the movie, and numerous plot points are jettisoned. Similarly, the novel’s emphasis on empathy and religion is largely replaced by a more existential exploration of memory, mortality, and identity. These tweaks are largely improvements. Not to mention, the innovative, immersive visual style of the movie is something that the book lacks completely.

‘The Bourne Identity’ (2002)

Image via Universal Studios

Advertisement

“Look at what they make you give.” The Bourne Identity begins when an unconscious man (Matt Damon) is rescued from the Mediterranean Sea with no memory of who he is. He slowly uncovers clues about his identity, gradually learning that he possesses extraordinary combat skills and is being hunted by powerful forces determined to eliminate him. This smash-hit, hugely influential action banger was based on Robert Ludlum‘s bestselling novel from 1980, though it makes many, many changes.

While the movie borrows the central setup, several character names, and the concept of Jason Bourne, it reinvents the conspiracy, the villains, Bourne’s past, and much of the plot. The Cold War context is removed, too, and the movie very much makes Bourne an assassin, while the novel is more ambiguous. In short, Ludlum’s novel is a dense, globe-spanning espionage thriller about false identities, whereas Doug Liman’s movie is a tense, character-driven action thriller.

‘The Shining’ (1980)

Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

Advertisement

“Here’s Johnny!” Here’s another that irked the author of the original book. Based on Stephen King‘s novel, Stanley Kubrick‘s horror classic centers on Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson), an aspiring writer who accepts a job as winter caretaker of the isolated Overlook Hotel, where he grows increasingly unstable. However, the book and movie differ dramatically in characterization, themes, supernatural elements, and even the ending.

Likewise, in the novel, Jack starts out as a fundamentally decent man who is slowly corrupted by the hotel. In the movie, Jack appears unstable almost from the beginning. On top of that, the Overlook Hotel is much more explicitly supernatural in the book. The film, by contrast, is more open-ended, allowing for multiple interpretations, including purely psychological ones. Nevertheless, the movie is still a masterpiece in its own right, even if it’s not great as a faithful adaptation.

Advertisement

The Shining

Advertisement

Release Date

June 13, 1980

Runtime

Advertisement

144 minutes

Director

Stanley Kubrick

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Actress Jodie Sweetin is opening up about the very beginning of “Full House,” revealing that another well-known actor almost played the role of Danny Tanner instead of Bob Saget. In a new episode of “Taboo’s Comics & Kicks” podcast, Sweetin, 44, said that after the production company shot the pilot, they wound up replacing actor John Posey with Saget, explaining that the “America’s Funniest Home Videos” host was the creator’s original choice for the role to begin with.

“We shot an entire pilot, actually, with a different dad … with John Posey, who was a lovely human being and very sweet and wonderful,” Sweetin confessed on the podcast, adding that while Saget was the actor the production team wanted, he was busy with another commitment.

Sweetin went on to say that “Full House” creator Jeff Franklin went to bat to have the pilot reshot with Saget after the network decided to send the show to series. “He was like, ‘I just know it. I just know this is who we need as the dad.’ And he was right,” Sweetin shared.

Posey Recalled Being Recast In ‘Full House’ After The Series Was Greenlit

During a previous interview with Yahoo, Posey, whose son is actor Tyler Posey of MTV’s “Teen Wolf,” opened up about the process of filming the “Full House” pilot, revealing that he learned he’d been recast with Saget months after shooting.

“And, you know, in all honesty, if somebody were to ask me now, I have no idea whether I was good in that pilot or not. It was all very new to me,” he said at the time.

Posey confessed that he was a bit in his head while on the “Full House” set because he grew up with a different style of comedy than what viewers saw on the beloved sitcom.

“So I can’t say that I was the most experienced guy on the set, plus you’re holding a baby in your arms the whole time, so I was learning about this, going along but I, overall I thought everything was pretty decent. And the show went. [ABC] picked it up with me, and everything was fine, until about a month or so later when I heard otherwise,” he said.

Jodie Sweetin Previously Joked About Returning To ‘Full House’ For A Third Spin-Off

Sweetin played the role of Stephanie Tanner in the ABC sitcom from 1987 to 1995. She later returned to the series in 2016 to reprise her role in the Netflix spin-off, “Fuller House.”

According to a previous report from The Blast, Sweetin said that she’d be more than open to returning to the series a third time if the opportunity ever presented itself.

“Absolutely. I love working with them,” she said in 2022. “It’s like, ‘Do you wanna go back and have fun and work with the people that you love, that you’ve known your whole life?’ Of course!”

The spin-off ended in 2020, and Sweetin joked years later that she could see hers, Andrea Barber’s, and Candace Cameron Bure’s characters filming a “Golden Girls” type of show.

“If you would have asked me twenty years ago if I would be coming back someday to play Stephanie Tanner as an adult, I would have been like, I don’t think that is going to happen. Who knows, in another 10, 15, 20 years we will do Fullest House, and I get to finally portray my Bea Arthur wannabe as one of The Golden Girls,” she said.

Jodie Sweetin Went To Extreme Lengths To Try And Shed What She Believed Was A ‘Stuck-Up’ Persona In High School

Another report from The Blast details Sweetin’s recent confession about her attempts to relate to her high school classmates at the height of her “Full House” fame.

“I had this weird, I’ll say, I had this, particularly after the show ended, like, in high school, there was this strange feeling that I had, because everyone assumed I was quote unquote a TV star. So, like, you know, the rumor before you would even start at a school was like, ‘Oh, she’s a stuck-up b-tch,’” she said.

According to Sweetin, she tried to course correct by acting “worse than them” and by “getting more f-cked up” than them with drugs and alcohol.

Sweetin previously spoke candidly about her past substance abuse, revealing that it began after her first drink at just 14-years-old at co-star Bure’s wedding.

Later, Sweetin said that her behavior spun so far out of control that her peers began expressing concern for her, advising her to “settle down” before things reached the point of no return.

Saget Died In 2022

In January 2022, Saget was found dead in his hotel room at The Ritz-Carlton Orlando from blunt head trauma following an “unwitnessed fall,” according to PEOPLE.

His memorial service was attended by his close friends and family, including his “Full House” co-stars, John Stamos, Bure, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, Sweetin, Dave Coulier, and Lori Loughlin.

Love Island USA‘s Parmida Keshani got brutally honest with Corbin Mims about his oral hygiene.

During the Sunday, June 28, episode, Corbin tried to kiss Parmida but she shut it down. She told him they wouldn’t do anything with his “stinky ass mouth” before he went to the bathroom to go brush his teeth.

Corbin was adjusting back to life in the villa after finding a connection with Parmida in Casa Amor. Their recoupling sparked backlash after Kenzie Annis dragged him for not considering her when he went to explore his chemistry with other women.

Earlier in the week, Corbin revealed there were “red flags” he didn’t address with Kenzie. This inspired Corbin to explore his options — and he later told the guys he “hasn’t thought” of Kenzie at all.

Love Island USA originally premiered in the U.K. in 2002 before it expanded worldwide with various spinoffs, including Love Island USA on Peacock. The series follows a different group of singles every season who have to pair off in order to stay in the show’s luxury villa.

The contestants — referred to as Islanders — live in isolation in a villa and are under constant video surveillance. They must be coupled up to remain on the show and stand a chance at receiving the $100,000 prize.

Season 8 escalated the sex that took place in the villa with multiple couples going all the way while sharing a bedroom in the villa. The drama escalated with Casa Amor when the new women discussed which guys they thought would pair off with them before returning to the villa.

They poked fun at Kenzie’s possible reaction to Parmida walking in with Corbin.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

“Kenzie just likes anyone who likes her,” Parmida said after the rest of the women made fun of how Kenzie spoke to Corbin.

New episodes of Love Island USA are released six days a week — except for Wednesdays — on Peacock.

Join Us Weekly and Bracketology.tv in our first-ever Love Island USA fantasy league! This is your chance to predict who you think will win Season 8 and rank the Islanders weekly based on how confident you are that they will survive the next elimination. You will be playing against our editors, get access to exclusive content and have the chance to win fun prizes. Sign up for free today!

Avatar: The Last Airbender is a one-of-a-kind series. It’s no surprise that fans haven’t loved any of the sequels, spinoffs, or adaptations quite as much as they loved the original, from the direct sequel The Legend of Korra to the live-action adaptation, which just premiered its second season on Netflix. It can be frustrating to watch this franchise stumble forward down treacherous storytelling paths when the perfect next step is right there waiting for it. Avatar Studios has an easy win in the Chronicles of the Avatar novel series, which is practically begging to be adapted into an animated series. These books have everything fans love about the original series without any of the baggage that comes with a live-action adaptation or a sequel in an uncertain future.

It’s been a rough couple of years for Avatar Studios, which hasn’t even officially released anything since its formation in 2021. The studio will debut this fall with the movie Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender, but the movie has already leaked online, softening its impact on the fandom. Many who watched the leaked movie left lackluster reviews, and the whole ordeal spawned a distracting cycle of discourse about studio politics and the ethics of media consumption. Meanwhile, Avatar Studios is charging ahead with its next sequel series, Avatar: Seven Havens — the third series in what they’re now calling the Avatar Legends franchise. None of this has helped get us back into the fictional setting we love to explore it’s amazing potential.

The ‘Avatar Legends’ Franchise Needs a Win

Image via Amulet Books

Aside from Avatar Aang, Avatar: Seven Havens is the only other project Avatar Studios has pulicly announced. It’s expected to debut next year, and it has all the talent it could need to succeed creatively — assuming it gets enough financial and marketing support from Paramount. However, some fans will inevitably feel alienated from the show since it takes place after The Legend of Korra. That series had its own ups and downs, and it changed the setting of the Avatar Legends franchise a lot in its time. It introduced advanced technology and industrialization to the Avatar world, which is too much for some fans to handle.

That’s not to say that Avatar Studios shouldn’t make sequels — Korra has some die-hard fans, and it will be exciting to see what comes next for this world. However, considering the franchise has a whole studio behind it, it’s surprising that they’re not taking the path of least resistance to draw lapsed fans back with prequels. Even without the Chronicles of the Avatar series, prequels would be a no-brainer for this franchise. Considering how great the novels are, they should definitely be adapted, as readers have been saying for years now.

‘Chronicles of the Avatar’ is The Ideal Prequel Format

Image via Nickelodeon Animation Studio

The Chronicles of the Avatar novel series kicked off in 2019 with The Rise of Kyoshi, written by F.C. Yee. As the title suggests, the novel centers around Avatar Kyoshi, the earth-bending Avatar who preceded Aang by two generations, living before Avatar Roku. Yee published a direct sequel the following year, The Shadow of Kyoshi, then wrote two more books in the series titled The Dawn of Yang Chen and The Legacy of Yang Chen. These leapt back another generation in the timeline. From there, author Randy Ribay took over for The Reckoning of Roku in 2024 and The Awakening of Roku in 2025. Ribay has signed on to write at least one more book in the series, but so far we don’t know which Avatar it will be about or when it might come out.

Each of these novels tells of a momentous adventure in the lives of one of Aang’s predecessors in the Avatar cycle. They take some time to explore the political and social climate of their times, but since they all take place before the 100-Year War, they are all pre-industrial and relatively familiar from a worldbuilding perspective. Of course, fans already know a bit about these past Avatars thanks to Aang’s interactions with them in the main series, but these novels give us a chance to learn more about them, and by extension, learn about the nature of the Avatar cycle itself.

Those who have read these books could probably rattle off ten reasons they should be adapted off the tops of their heads. There are some incredible action scenes in the prose format, and seeing them animated would be a dream come true. There are also some unforgettable characters begging to be brought to life on screen, as every Avatar had their own version of “the Gaang.”

An adaptation of the Chronicles of the Avatar novels would work well as a series of animated movies, or as an anthology TV series. The team behind the Avatar Aang movie displayed some incredible art and animation skills, and they could have done wonders with Yee and Ribay’s writing. Hopefully it’s not too late, as it seems like Avatar Studios’ best days are still ahead of it. Sadly, there’s only one chance to make a first impression, and this studio’s first impression was denied a theatrical release, then leaked unceremoniously.

If nothing else, hopefully the Avatar Legends renaissance will introduce more fans to the Chronicles of the Avatar novel series. All six installments are available now in print, digital, and audiobook formats, and at least one more is on the way. Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender will premiere on Paramount+ on October 9. The live-action Avatar: The Last Airbender Season 2 premiered on Thursday, June 25 on Netflix.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

2005 – 2008

Advertisement

Network

Nickelodeon

Showrunner

Advertisement

Michael Dante DiMartino

Directors

Giancarlo Volpe, Ethan Spaulding, Lauren MacMullan, Dave Filoni, Joaquim Dos Santos, Anthony Lioi

Advertisement

Writers

Tim Hedrick, Elizabeth Welch Ehasz, Joshua Hamilton, James Eagan, Joann Estoesta, Nick Malis, May Chan, Katie Mattila

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement