War movies often focus on the chaos of battle itself, but some of the most fascinating stories surrounding World War 2 happened long before soldiers ever reached the battlefield. Massive historical moments are usually remembered through explosions, invasions, and speeches, yet many of those decisions were shaped quietly behind closed doors by people forced to make impossible calls with incomplete information and enormous consequences.
That tension sits at the center of the upcoming historical drama Pressure. As part of Collider’s Summer Preview Event, we’re thrilled to exclusively reveal a new image from the movie featuring Damian Lewis as famed British military commander Bernard Montgomery. Set during the critical 72 hours leading up to D-Day, Pressure follows General Dwight D. Eisenhower and meteorologist Captain James Stagg as they grapple with whether to proceed with the largest seaborne invasion in history despite catastrophic weather conditions threatening the Allied operation.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz Which Oscar Best Picture Is Your Perfect Movie? Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
🐦Birdman
Advertisement
🪙No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
01
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.
Advertisement
02
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?
Advertisement
03
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
Advertisement
04
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
Advertisement
05
What do you want from a film’s ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
Advertisement
06
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.
Advertisement
07
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
Advertisement
08
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
Advertisement
09
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
Advertisement
10
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Advertisement
Parasite
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Advertisement
Everything Everywhere All at Once
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
Advertisement
Oppenheimer
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Advertisement
Birdman
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
Advertisement
No Country for Old Men
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
Advertisement
‘Pressure’ Explores the Decision That Changed World War 2
Advertisement
Directed by Hotel Mumbai filmmaker Anthony Maras, Pressure stars Andrew Scott as Captain James Stagg alongside Brendan Fraser as General Dwight D. Eisenhower, with Lewis portraying Bernard Montgomery. Kerry Condon, Chris Messina, and Con O’Neill round out the supporting cast. According to the movie’s official description, Eisenhower and Stagg are forced to decide whether to launch the invasion despite catastrophic weather risks or delay the operation and potentially change the course of the war entirely… and likely for the worse.
That setup immediately gives Pressure a compelling identity within the WW2 genre. Instead of centering its tension around combat itself, the movie is more interested in the agonizing uncertainty beforehand. Everything reportedly hinges on whether Stagg can accurately predict a narrow break in the weather before time runs out. A failed forecast could have devastated the invasion before troops ever reached Normandy, leaving military leadership trapped between two potentially catastrophic choices while the clock steadily moved toward D-Day. The material also feels especially well-suited to Maras as a filmmaker. Hotel Mumbai worked because of how effectively it sustained anxiety and momentum inside contained spaces, and Pressure appears positioned to channel that same sense of mounting dread into a very different historical setting.
Pressure arrives in theaters on May 29, 2026. Stay tuned to Collider throughout the week as our Summer Preview Event continues with exclusive looks at some of the biggest upcoming movies of the season.
Daveigh Chase may not be a household name, but her face is known everywhere, and she also provided the voice for one of the most beloved Disney films of the modern era, Lilo and Stitch. Despite her legendary status as a juvenile, she did not fare so well as an adult. The actress passed away on Tuesday, June 16, 2026, after battles with drug addiction, homelessness, bacterial meningitis, and a blood infection. She was 35.
While her career was short-lived, it carried three notable roles that make her almost universally recognizable to fans of all stripes.
Daveigh Chase’s Iconic Roles
Her best-known voice-over role was as Lilo in Lilo & Stitch, the 2002 Disney animated feature about a young Hawaiian girl who befriends a dangerous but cuddly alien lifeform. The story centered around Ohana, a concept of family togetherness that leaves no one behind. When Stitch invades the lives of Lilo and her beleaguered older sister and caregiver, Nani, the little girl mistakes him for a dog and adopts him into her home. While Nani has to dodge social workers seeking to separate Lilo from her, government agents and alien bounty hunters are on the search for Stitch. Chase voiced Lilo for both the movie and the three-season TV show.
She also provided the voice of Chihiro Ogino in the English dub of the famous Hayao Miyazaki movie, Spirited Away. This 2001 classic introduced an entire new generation of viewers to Japanese animation and to the work of the amazing artist, bringing it beyond the niche anime fandom of other works like Princess Mononoke and Kiki’s Delivery Service and inviting numerous fans to join the anime craze.
From Animation To Live Action
Chase’s connection to Japanese cinema would not end with Spirited Away. Mere months after the release of Lilo & Stitch came her breakout live-action role, as the sinister Samara in The Ring. The 2002 horror film was an adaptation of the Japanese classic Ringu, and at the time, Japanese horror was very popular in the United States, as shown by the success of adaptations like The Grudge and imports like Audition.
For Chase, though, the role of Samara put her in the center of the action. Almost everyone has seen the iconic black-haired child crawl out of the well and emerge from the TV, even people who have never heard of The Ring. The scene has been shown, spoofed, and rehashed numerous times, forming a cornerstone of Western culture despite its Japanese roots.
Advertisement
A Life Cut Tragically Too Short
Unfortunately, Chase’s adult life more resembled Samara’s horror story than it did Lilo’s Ohana. Ditching her family at the age of 19, she had an adult life plagued with drug use and scrapes with the law, according to John David Schwallier, her estranged father. She had apparently been homeless, living on the streets near the hospital in which she died with her boyfriend, Roy Hernandez. Hernandez had attempted to collect funds to help her, and he and Schwallier had been in touch prior to her passing, allowing Schwallier to spend her last days with her and announce the news.
Many people loved Daveigh Chase in her childhood roles, but despite growing into a beautiful young woman, her career dried up when she became an adult. Her iconic films are all we have to remember her by, particularly her chilling turn in The Ring. May she find the peace in death that she never found in life.
Anne Hathaway met husbandAdam Shulman and it was love at first sight — but their real-life fairy tale almost didn’t come true.
“You know when you don’t know someone very well, you just meet them and you’re like, ‘Wow, you really have it going on?’… We hit it off immediately, but it took us a pretty long time to get together,” Hathaway toldVogue in October 2010, noting that despite the terrible timing, she was convinced she had found The One.
The pair first crossed paths through mutual friends while attending the Palm Springs Film Festival in April 2008. While the Ella Enchanted actress toldHarper’s Bazaar UKin February 2013 that she knew “from the second I met him that he was the love of my life,” she “also knew that I couldn’t have met him at a worse time.”
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
Hathaway ultimately took a chance on Shulman — and she hasn’t looked back since.
The Modern Love actress and American Dreams alum went on to get engaged in 2011 and tie the knot one year later. Since their nuptials, the couple have welcomed sons Jonathan and Jack, who were born in 2016 and 2019, respectively. In June 2026, Hathaway announced she is pregnant again.
Keep scrolling for a complete timeline of Hathaway and Shulman’s love story:
Low-budget sci-fi is the ultimate proving ground for filmmakers because if they don’t lean into their limitations, they’re dead in the water. When done right, we get films like Primer (2004), Coherence (2013), Empathy, Inc. (2018), and my new favorite comedy in this wheelhouse, 2014’s The Infinite Man. With a cast of three, no special effects to speak of, and what appears to be an abandoned motel serving as the film’s primary location, The Infinite Man is about as bare bones as it gets.
It’s a time travel story, but really about how a man’s insecurities catch up with him in the most unhinged way possible. He builds a device that he thinks will save his relationship and, through his own doing, makes everything infinitely worse for himself. It’s almost poetic how badly he screws everything up, and if you love a good comedy of errors that’s both low-budget and high-concept, The Infinite Man is exactly what you’re looking for.
You Can’t Control Everybody, Not Even Your Past Self
The plot of The Infinite Man is simple at first, but snowballs in complexity as it barrels through its second and third acts. Dean (Josh McConville) is on the verge of a nervous breakdown after his anniversary with Lana (Hanna Marshall) doesn’t exactly go as planned. The motel they stayed at the previous year is now abandoned, and all the activities Dean had in mind to woo his unenthusiastic partner never materialize.
Like clockwork, almost as if planned, Lana’s ex-boyfriend, Terry (Alex Dimitriades), shows up, shocks Dean with a cattle prod, and leaves with Lana. Dean is distressed about this for a number of reasons. Most importantly, his desire to control every minor detail is so intense that he doesn’t realize how unhappy Lana is. But what’s really grinding his gears is the fact that Lana only dated Terry, a self-proclaimed pole-vaulting legend, for two weeks several years earlier.
Broken by this turn of events, Dean locks himself in the motel for a year and builds a time machine that allows him to travel back to the day Lana left him, effectively giving himself a do-over. The machine works, and he’s able to interact with both his past self and the past version of Lana. His attempts to influence their behavior without being detected backfire immediately when he’s discovered, setting off a chain of events that results in multiple duplicates of himself, Lana, and even Terry, all of whom vaguely recall Dean’s meddling.
It gets to the point where present-day Dean forces one of the Lanas to wear an earpiece while speaking with another version of himself so he can tell her exactly what to say, convinced his influence will lead everybody toward the correct outcome. But every time Dean interferes, things continue to get worse, not only for him, but for everybody around him.
Advertisement
Sometimes It’s Just Best To Let It Go
Dean’s character in The Infinite Man is a fascinating study. He’s a brilliant inventor and clever as hell, but his personality is so grating that it’s hard to root for him. He makes too many assumptions about people, is far too insecure for his own good, and every motivation he has is fundamentally selfish. He got dumped for being a control freak, and his solution is to become an even bigger control freak.
As annoying as Dean is, that’s where all the humor comes from, so it’s a fair tradeoff. He constantly gets his ass handed to him by his own miscalculations, and when he finally has to interact with alternate versions of himself, he starts to realize that he’s the problem. His evolution across the film’s brief 85-minute runtime is beyond impressive because you start out hating the guy, but gradually grow to like him as he becomes more self-aware.
The Infinite Man is a brilliant example of what filmmakers like Hugh Sullivan can do with virtually no budget, a tight screenplay, and the right characters to bring a concept like this to life. If you’re a creator in any capacity, it should always be inspiring when somebody gets out there and makes something, limitations be damned.
As of this writing, you can stream The Infinite Man for free on Tubi.
Villains are some of the best parts of any given movie, and for good reason. A well-constructed villain acts as a foil to the heroes, either by showing them a dark reflection of what they could end up as, or by presenting a formidable obstacle that the hero must overcome to achieve their goals. The most iconic villains become staples of popular culture, representing the many faces of evil and standing as inspirations for storytellers to create their own brand of wickedness.
Animated films have had a great selection of villains, with the vast majority coming from Disney, which is unsurprising, since the studio has contributed to the vast majority of animated films over the years. However, other companies have created baddies that are just as good as the best from Disney, and it’s high time we start to celebrate them.
Advertisement
10
Jenner (Paul Shenar) – ‘The Secret of NIMH’ (1982)
Jenner holding his sword against a red skyImage via MGM
As one of several rats and mice experimented on by the National Institute of Mental Health, Jenner (Paul Shenar) obtained advanced intelligence, and escaped with the others to establish a colony underneath a farmer’s rosebush. As the rats made advancements in science that bordered on magical, they needed to steal more and more electricity from the farmers, so their leader, Nicodemus (Sir Derek Jacobi), began preparations for the rats to migrate to Thorn Valley and make a new home. However, Jenner saw no reason to leave and voiced his opposition to the plan, while also waiting for the right opportunity to kill Nicodemus and seize control.
Jenner only appears in under 10 minutes of The Secret of NIMH, but he leaves a very strong impression thanks to his design, Shenar’s fantastic delivery, and for what he represents. Initially, Jenner serves as the conservative voice of opposition who wants to keep to the old ways, and has more than enough charisma to mask his true intentions as deep passion for his beliefs. However, the fact that he is willing to resort to underhanded murder shows that, while their enhanced intelligence allows the rats to create many wonders, it also leaves them susceptible to vices like pride, ambition, and greed.
Advertisement
9
General Woundwort (Harry Andrews) – ‘Watership Down’ (1978)
General Woundwort leaping into battleImage via Cinema International Corporation
You might not think that rabbits could be scary, but General Woundwort (Harry Andrews) manages to make such a cute animal horrific. The tyrannical ruler of the Efrafa warren, Woundwort holds onto power with authoritarianism and fear, battling the leaders of other warrens to the death to add to his ranks, and rewarding loyalty by allowing his followers to rise higher in his hierarchy. However, his need for control results in his warren becoming too overcrowded, which leads several members to risk their lives and try and find a means of escape or a new warren to join.
Woundwort combines the darkest parts of nature and humanity to present Watership Down with an unforgettable antagonist. He’s not entirely heartless towards the rabbits under his rule, but his pride and need for control is so great that he perverts the animal’s natural instincts to survive into totalitarianism and brutality. In combat, Woundwort’s an absolute monster, killing his fellow rabbits with ease and even standing his ground against predators.
When zookeeper Frank DeTorre (Bill Murrey) eats a hard-boiled egg spat out by a chimpanzee, he brings a large host of germs and viruses into his body, including Thrax (Laurence Fishburne). With his elongated talon on his left hand, Thrax can ignite any cell he touches, and quickly makes his way through Frank’s body in order to sabotage the hypothalamus and cause him to overheat. His ultimate plan is to kill Frank within 24 hours before moving on to a new human to get his own chapter in the medical books.
Osmosis Jones suffered due to the live-action segments, but the animated ones are well praised, and Thrax is a big reason for it. Not only does he have a slick design that oozes confidence and power, but he has the personality to boot, presenting himself as a suave and charismatic villain, helped by Fishburne’s deliciously wicked performance. However, beneath this debonair mask lies a cunning predator who delights in the process of building up to his next kill, and won’t hesitate to incinerate anyone in his way.
Advertisement
7
Grigori Rasputin (Christopher Lloyd) – ‘Anastasia’ (1997)
Grigori Rasputin summoning demons from his reliquaryImage via 20th Century Studios
Once the advisor to Tsar Nicolas II (Rick Jones) of the Russian Empire, Grigori Rasputin (Christopher Lloyd) was exposed as a power-hungry charlatan and banished, leading to him selling his soul to dark powers in exchange for a magic reliquary. He used it to curse the Romanov family, who were toppled from power during the Russian Revolution, while Rasputin drowned trying to kill the youngest daughter, Anastasia (Meg Ryan). The reliquary kept his soul alive in limbo, and when his bat minion, Bartok (Hank Azaria), found Anastia as a young amnesiac woman, Rasputin swore to kill the last of the Romanovs personally.
Anastasia takes a lot of liberties in transforming Russian history into a fairy tale romance, and the changes to Rasputin are among the best. He’s basically a lich—a powerful undead sorcerer whose soul is tied to a magic artifact—allowing the movie to have fun playing around with his undead nature through physical comedy, and genuine moments of horror. Lloyd’s voice work is also impeccable, especially in the scenes where Rasputin unleashes his dark magic and truly lives up to the title of the Mad Monk.
Advertisement
6
King Haggard (Christopher Lee) – ‘The Last Unicorn’ (1982)
King Haggard on his throneImage via ITV Studios Global Entertainment
In a crumbling castle by the sea lives King Haggard (Sir Christopher Lee). Despite ruling over a kingdom, he is cursed with a melancholy so deep that he practically lives alone in his castle aside from the most minimal of staff and his adopted son, Prince Lir (Jeff Bridges). The only thing that brought him any joy were unicorns, so he sent forth his demonic red bull to round them up and drive them into the waves beneath his castle so that he could look upon them whenever he wished.
Though The Last Unicorn is a modern fairy tale, author Peter S. Beagle, who wrote the film script, understands his genre well enough to write King Haggard with Shakespearean levels of tragedy. Haggard’s intense depression that sees him live in empty halls and rule over a barren wasteland would be pitiable, except that, by stealing the unicorns to bring himself joy, he deprives the world of something beautiful and pure and cares nothing for the consequences. Lee, as expected, gives a stellar performance full of power and gravitas, and even voiced Haggard in the German dub.
Advertisement
5
The Beldam (Teri Hatcher) – ‘Coraline’ (2009)
The Beldam in her true formImage via Focus Features
Also known as the Other Mother, the Beldam (Teri Hatcher) is a spider-like monster who lives in a pocket dimension and spies on our world using animated puppets. Once she finds a miserable child, she lures them into her world, which is altered to cater to their every whim, and offers to let them stay if she can sew black buttons onto their eyes. Once the child accepts, they become trapped in her world, their lives sacrificed to sustain the Beldam, and their souls left as her eternal prisoners.
The Beldam is a horrific antagonist that helped Coraline earn its spot as one of the darkest animated films for kids. Though exaggerated for the fantastical setting, her methods are terrifying thanks to how close to home they are: she lures kids with false love, gifts, and attention, but once she gets what she wants, she disposes of them and moves on to the next victim. Fittingly, her true self is spider-like with needle-like fingers and a skeletal body, which represents everything from the webs she spins to trap her prey to the hollow promises she offers.
Can Fairy Godmother get a whoop whoop?Image via DreamWorks Pictures
To wed the human princess, Lillian (Dame Julie Andrews), a fog named Harold (John Cleese) makes a deal with the Fairy Godmother (Jennifer Saunders) to become a prince in exchange for his future daughter marrying her son, Prince Charming (Rupert Everett). Thus, the Fairy Godmother is not happy to learn that Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) has instead been rescued from her dragon-guarded tower by an ogre named Shrek (Mike Myers), and that she is now permanently an ogre. She blackmails Harold into trying to have Shrek killed, but later realizes she can manipulate Shrek’s insecurities to get what she wants.
Shrek 2 is one of those rare sequels that surpasses the original movie, and Fairy Godmother is the perfect villain to continue a franchise known for satirizing fairy tale clichés. Rather than being a kind, matronly figure who rewards kindness and empathy, this Fairy Godmother is a cutthroat businesswoman who treats happily ever afters like a commodity that can be bought and sold, allowing her to dictate who or what gets their fairy tale endings and eliminate anything that doesn’t fit her idea. Then there is Saunders’ performance, which is just perfect; she nails the ruthless and manipulative side of the character, while still managing to get some comedy through moments like her fawning over her son or failing to maintain her diet due to stress.
Advertisement
3
Lord Shen (Gary Oldman) – ‘Kung Fu Panda 2’ (2011)
Lord Shen arrives.Image via Paramount Pictures
When Lord Shen (Gary Oldman) began experimenting with his family’s fireworks as weapons, his parents asked a Soothsayer (Michelle Yeoh) about his future, and she said Shen would meet his end at the hands of a warrior of black and white. Overhearing the prophecy, Shen decided to prove that he was the master of his fate by massacring a village of pandas, but his parents were horrified by his actions and banished him from Gongmen City. Heartbroken, Shen vowed to reclaim his home city and eventually all of China, and spent the next 20 years building an army of followers and an arsenal of cannons.
Lord Shen is a masterclass in villain writing, and his personal relationship with Po (Jack Black) is the central conflict of Kung Fu Panda 2. He truly is Po’s dark mirror: both of them suffered trauma from loss and battle insecurities, but while Po was able to make peace with his trauma and choses to help others, Shen became bitter and decided to fill the void by taking what he believed he was owed. Yet his interactions with the Soothsayer reveal that beneath his cold, calculated demeanor is a wounded soul who knows that what he is doing is wrong and may even show some remorse, but also believes that he’s too far gone to change and must instead stay the course. Lord Shen is one of the best villains in a martial arts movie, full stop.
Within an abandoned Japanese amusement park is a portal to a village in the spirit world centered around a bathhouse run by the witch Yubaba (Mari Natsuki/Suzanne Pleshette). Due to an ancient promise she made, she accepts anyone who comes to her asking for a job, but as part of the contract, she takes their true names, binding them to her unless they can somehow reclaim them. Yubaba spends most of her days counting her profits, doting on her son Boh (Ryūnosuke Kamiki/Tara Strong), and messing with her good-hearted twin sister, Zaneba (Mari Natsuki/Suzanne Pleshette).
Like most things in Spirited Away, every detail about Yubaba is meticulously chosen for its symbolism. She initially represents greed and decadence with her obsession with profit and the iron grip she has over her staff, but when paired up with her sister, she becomes a dichotomy of the human spirit, representing the negative aspects. Yet Yubaba is not entirely evil: she deeply loves her son to the point of flying into a fiery rage if he’s threatened, always keeps her word, and even shows begrudging respect to those who do a good job or even manage to beat her at her own game.
1
Rameses II (Ralph Fiennes) – ‘The Prince of Egypt’ (1998)
A neck up shot of Rameses, voiced by Ralph Fiennes, staring ahead angrily with a clenched fist in front of his mouth in The Prince of Egypt.Image via DreamWorks Animation
Advertisement
As the heir of Pharaoh Seti I (Sir Patrick Steward), Rameses (Ralph Fienns) has the incredible burden of one day taking over the Egyptian Empire and the legacy of upholding his family dynasty. He is supported in his youth by his adopted brother, Moses (Val Kilmer), until Moses learns the truth of his origins and runs off into the desert after killing an Egyptian taskmaster. Thus, when Rameses takes the throne after Seti’s death, he becomes committed to upholding his family legacy, even when Moses returns to ask Rameses to free the Hebrew slaves of Egypt.
The Prince of Egypt is one of the most epic animated movies of all time. Logically, Rameses is a fittingly epic villain because the writers emphasize his inner turmoil between his insecurities about breaking his dynastic chain and his love for Moses and the life they used to have. And, like any great villain, Rameses’ attempts to show strength and maintain his power doom him, all of which is captured through the phenomenal facial animation and Fiennes’ stellar performance.
Everybody copes with grief differently, and most of us don’t even know how to handle and process it until it’s already knocking on our doors. Some people lose themselves in their work, or a passion project, and some people seek therapy. Some people do all of these things. Benny (Barak Hardley), the protagonist in 2018’s Spell, copes with the loss of his fiancé Jess (Jackie Tohn) by taking a solo, soul-searching trip to Iceland, where he finds out he might actually be a pawn in a supernatural game that will either solve his problems or make him wish he never left the United States.
The film is a compelling yet oddball exploration of grief, self-medicating, and searching for greater meaning after your life as you know it has been turned completely upside down. It’s also a hilarious sequence of events thanks to Barak Hardley’s commitment to the role and his character’s various quirks and idiosyncrasies.
That Escalated Quickly
When Spell first introduces us to Benny, he’s a total mess. He’s arriving at an Icelandic airport, and we’re immediately clued into his compulsive behavior. While I’m partial to counting stairs and making sure both my eyes blink an equal number of times so neither of them feels left out, Benny likes to lick shiny metal surfaces like door handles, water taps, and, in one case, a phallic art installation at one of the local museums. To make matters worse, he’s out of meds, dealing with the stress of a new location, and unable to immediately reach his doctor to get a new prescription filled overseas.
Oh yeah, and the grief that brought us here in the first place. Three months before the events depicted in Spell, Benny’s fiancé drowned in their pool while he wasn’t around, and he’s still unpacking that trauma.
He copes by having a one-night stand with Inga (Birna Rún Eiríksdóttir), who encourages him to get a tattoo of a symbol he doesn’t yet understand, but soon will. He wakes up the next day not knowing where Inga ran off to after stealing from him, and he soon connects with a tour guide named Steindor (Magnus Jonsson), who takes him hiking, talks about supernatural entities and ancient mythology, and hints at the fact that Benny is some sort of “chosen one.”
From this point forward, I really can’t go deeper into the film’s plot without revealing major spoilers, and this is one you’ll want to see for yourself. But you’ll want to stick around because there are visions, naked hot spring melees, boozy camping conversations, and the fact that you can never quite tell what’s actually happening to Benny and what’s simply a manifestation of his grief, compulsions, and lack of medication.
Advertisement
Barak Hardley Is A Perfect Lead
Though I can’t presently speak to Barak Hardley’s other work, he’s an absolute treasure in Spell. Benny is a complex character with personal hangups, recent traumas, and the endless intrusive thoughts that somebody with OCD has to deal with, all while navigating an unfamiliar landscape where everybody seems to be screwing with him on not only a human level, but a spiritual one.
He’s rightfully wary for all of these reasons, but whenever pressed, no matter how gently, he simply says “screw it” and does pretty much whatever he’s told. Since Jess’ death, which prompted him to go on this trip in the first place, he’s got nothing to lose and figures his life can’t get any worse, so he just goes along with everything that’s thrown at him.
Benny’s search for fulfillment and meaning doesn’t leave him with any easy answers, but his journey isn’t necessarily linear either. Grief comes and goes, and he’s just going through the motions while trying to unpack his demons in the most unconventional way possible. The question that remains is whether he finds the answers he’s looking for.
As of this writing, you can stream Spell for free on Tubi.
From the moment Tracker premiered, Colter Shaw’s (Justin Hartley) biggest unsolved case was his father. For years, Colter lived with questions that fractured his family, poisoned his relationship with his brother Russell (Jensen Ackles), and left him wondering whether the man who raised him had simply lost his grip on reality.
What began as a seemingly straightforward mystery surrounding Ashton Shaw’s (Lee Tergesen) death slowly evolved into something far more complicated, with each new revelation forcing Colter to reconsider everything he thought he knew. Season 3 finally delivered many of the answers fans had been waiting for, but that’s precisely why the story still hits like a punch to the gut. The truth proved that some wounds never fully disappear and merely become easier to understand.
Advertisement
The Shaw Family Mystery Was Never Really About Who Killed Ashton
When Tracker began, Colter carried a burden that had defined much of his life. He believed his older brother Russell had killed their father during a confrontation in the woods. His mother, Mary (Wendy Crewson), did little to challenge that belief, and the siblings’ fractured relationship only deepened over time. However, as the series progressed, that simple explanation began to crumble as Russell insisted he was innocent, new evidence emerged, hidden journals surfaced, and long-buried secrets involving Ashton’s research and mysterious figures from his past slowly transformed what appeared to be a tragic family story into something much stranger.
What made the mystery so compelling was the damage those unanswered questions inflicted on the Shaw family. Mary kept secrets, Dory (Melissa Roxburgh) withheld information, Russell carried years of guilt and resentment, and Colter spent decades convinced he understood what had happened when, in reality, almost everyone around him had been protecting pieces of the truth. By the time Season 3 arrived, Tracker had made one thing clear: the biggest victim of all those secrets was the family Ashton left behind.
Advertisement
Season 3 Changed Everything Colter Believed About His Father
An overhead shot of Ashton Shaw (Lee Tergesen) looking up to the sky and smiling on ‘Tracker’Image via CBS
For years, Ashton existed in Colter’s memories as a contradiction, for he was the man who taught him to survive, but also the man whose behavior terrified his family. The deeper Colter dug, the more difficult it became to separate the loving father from the obsessive, paranoid figure his mother remembered. Season 3 refused to simplify that contradiction. Ashton wasn’t transformed into a saint, nor was he reduced to a madman; instead, Tracker embraced something far more complicated. Ashton was flawed, made mistakes, and hurt people he loved, but he was also trying to stop something he believed was wrong.
Advertisement
The Truth Brought Colter Peace, But Not Closure
Justin Hartley looks pensive as Colter Shaw in the ‘Tracker’ episode “Chrono Stasis”Image via CBS
Perhaps the most powerful moment in the entire storyline comes near the end of Season 3, when Colter admits that he may not have found every answer, but he finally knows his father was trying to do the right thing, though it’s clear he didn’t exactly get the closure he sought. It goes to show that sometimes peace comes not from learning enough to understand motivations, at the very least.
There are still unanswered questions, however. Season 3 leaves the door wide open for more revelations, and Russell’s final scenes suggest the Shaw family secrets are far from finished. Yet something fundamental has changed, as Colter no longer seems trapped by the past as he once was. The mystery still hits like a punch to the gut two years later because, beneath the government conspiracies and secret programs, Tracker told a deeply human story about grief. Colter was searching for his father, at the end of it all, and after years of doubt, anger, and heartbreak, the answer he found was understanding, which was probably more than he expected.
Bold and the Beautiful delivers financial concerns cropping up over at Forrester Creations. Remember Ridge Forrester (Thorsten Kaye) was just mentioning when talking to Carter Walton (Lawrence Saint-Victor) about how much the new couture line cost and justifying it. Meanwhile, over at Logan,Bill Spencer (Don Diamont) is focusing on quality materials, but not at the risk of the bottom line.
We’re going to talk about how this new couture collection may cause financial problems at Forrester Creations. And if so, I suspect Bill is going to be absolutely gleeful to see Ridge suffer.
Bold and the Beautiful: The Cost of Eric’s Couture Line
Let’s dive in. So, this week it was actually Carter Walton who warned both Ridge and Eric Forrester (John McCook) that this upcoming couture line they’re about to launch is going to be the most expensive collection in Forrester Creations history. And Ridge said you can’t put a price on showcasing Eric’s genius. Except yeah, you can put a price on it. Literally, they have been dropping hints about this on Bold for a while. If you remember when Eric was over working with Katie and Bill, they had a debate with Eric over materials. Bill wanted to source high-quality materials that were luxurious but were not needlessly and insanely expensive.
But Eric pushed back and he was complaining about not being able to use the same suppliers that Forrester Creations had because they were keeping his line at Katie’s new fashion house under wraps. And as it turned out, the designs were well-received. They sold through the roof and Bill and Katie made bank. And now, of course, we’ve got Ridge heavily investing in Eric maybe overinvesting. I said this the other day, and it bears repeating. Logan is living rent-free in Ridge, Steffy Forrester’s (Jacqueline MacInnes Wood), and Brooke Logan’s (Katherine Kelly Lang) heads. Eric’s head, too. I don’t know why they’re all so threatened by Logan when Forrester is legendary. And now they are burning through cash trying to teach them a lesson.
Advertisement
Bold and Beautiful fans Not Impressed
And honestly, a lot of Bold and the Beautiful fans that I’ve seen comments from on soap social media think the designs Eric did for Logan were better. I agree. And I think this is storyline intentional. The gowns he designed for Forrester seemed kind of meh. You know, classy, but not particularly impressive or unique or inspired, and that seems very intentional. Ridge raved about the design. So did RJ Forrester (Brayan Nicoletti) and Zende Forrester (Delon de Metz). But that doesn’t mean the public is going to agree.
Eric’s Lost Passion and Financial Risk on B&B
So, Carter was warning about the cost and if Eric’s line doesn’t sell out, this could be an epic financial fail for the Foresters. Ridge spending so much could put the bottom line in jeopardy. And if I had to come up with a word for what I’ve seen of Eric’s new line or what you know we’ve seen so far, I’m going to call it uninspired, maybe forced. If you remember after Ridge fired him, Eric was down in the dumps because he had all these fantastic designs on paper and in his head, but nowhere to produce them. And then when Katie Logan (Heather Tom) accepted Eric’s very insistent offer that he be her lead designer, we saw him passionate and he was really enthusiastic working at Logan.
Eric was so excited that in the end he worked himself to the bone and collapsed. I don’t think that was Katie and Bill’s fault. They didn’t want Eric exhausted, but he was just so excited. He even said the designs he made for Katie at the time were the best of his career. And Eric had something to prove. He said he wanted to rub it in Brooke and Ridge’s faces to respect your elders. So, Eric had both anger and passion driving his work at Logan.
Eric’s Passion Fizzling Out on Bold and the Beautiful
Then, coming back over to Forrester Creations, there’s this whole other vibe. Ridge had kicked Eric out of his own company and then Ridge backtracked, but Eric’s feelings were hurt. Plus, he felt guilty about going to Logan, even though honestly it was Ridge’s fault 100% that he ever went there. So, this collection Eric’s done for Forrester I feel like was driven by guilt.
Advertisement
And carried out under a lot of pressure and expectations because Ridge made it clear they had to outdo and overshadow the work Eric did at Logan, the work he said was his best. So, that’s a lot. Ridge, of course, is happy to have his dad back, but I haven’t seen Eric quite as inspired. I’ve seen him more tense. And there’s a lot of motive behind this line that’s not strictly driven by creativity, which should be the whole driving force behind fashion design.
Bold and the Beautiful: Logan’s Bottom Line Advantage
Eric hasn’t mentioned Ridge forcibly retiring him, but that has to still bother Eric. Meanwhile, over at Logan, it feels like there’s more of a balance between creativity and cost-consciousness. Bill’s not aiming to make cheap stuff by any means. This is not, you know, discount fashion. He just doesn’t want Katie, you know, embarrassed. But also, Bill’s savvy enough to know that a company’s got to make a profit. So, like this week when we saw Deacon Sharpe (Sean Kanan) come in with the new design while Hope Logan (Annika Noelle) was gone, and Bill and Katie looked at it, they liked it, but then Bill asked, “Is it going to be cost-effective to produce?” And Deacon assured Bill that it would be that all the designs are.
So, it feels like there’s a more bottom-line focus at Logan than Forrester Creations. And we know that it seems like Hope is waffling on putting out her new line over at Logan because of her guilt over how Brooke’s going to react. But in the end, I just don’t think Hope is going to walk away from Logan because when Brooke storms over to rant at Katie soon, looks like early next week. Hope is still there. It’s a different day, different outfit. She’s hiding from her mom. And I do think the new Hope Logan line that she made with Deke Sharpe (Harrison Cone) is going to be a big hit for Logan. And unfortunately, the new Eric couture line at Forrester may not be a smash hit.
Bold and the Beautiful: Ridge Forrester – Bill Spencer
Bold and the Beautiful: Financial Troubles Ahead for Forrester
They may barely cover the cost of production or Carter may have to tell them they lost money on the line. There’s just so much smug talk from Steffy and Ridge about Logan circling the drain and Katie being a failure who’s going to eventually skulk back over to Forrester Creations. I guess they want to see her begging for her old PR job back. So, I feel like it’s foreshadowing that the opposite may happen. I think Logan could have another hit. And I don’t think Eric’s line is going to flop, but maybe it just won’t do as well as they need.
And while Bill may be able to report record earnings, we could see Carter having to tell Ridge, “Oh, whoops. We’re in money trouble.” Then I guess we’ll see how smug Ridge and Steffy are. And I’m sure they would blame Katie if it happens. Blame her and accuse her of stealing Eric, which she didn’t, and blame her for stealing Hope, which she kind of did.
Advertisement
Hope Unhappy at Forrester on Bold and the Beautiful
But Katie couldn’t have recruited Hope if she hadn’t been kicked around so much by Steffy. It’s like that thing about how you can’t steal somebody when they cheat if the marriage wasn’t broken. You know, maybe kind of the same sort of vibe. But once again, this is back to how people are treated by Ridge and Steffy. Maybe Forrester can sue Logan for damages since Hope is very much still their employee. And she was lying about a leave of absence so that she could sneak over to work secretly at Katie’s company.
And of course, if they sued for damages, that might help refill Ridge’s coffers over at Forrester. However, I will say Bold doesn’t usually do litigious storylines. So that may not happen even though technically it would be legally possible. But with Carter over atForrester and Bill over at Logan this week both talking about the bottom line, I smell trouble in the wind. I don’t think it’s for nothing. I think it’s a huge red flag that Ridge is about to see Forrester in deep financial trouble. And of course, you know, that would make Bill totally giddy.
Days of Our Lives fans saw Kristen DiMera (Stacy Haiduk) already tried to have EJ DiMera’s (Dan Feuerriegel) son killed. And then after failing to off Johnny DiMera (Carson Boatman), we saw Kristen swap strategies to estrangement.
And then she just made what seems like a random call to her niece Sydney DiMera and she’s clearly up to no good. So, let’s get into exactly what Kristen is trying to do targeting EJ’s son and now his daughter.
Days of Our Lives: Kristen’s New Target
And now, let’s get into what is going on because clearly Kristen has a death wish and I think her brother is just about ready to grant it. We know that DiMera siblings have no problem going to war with each other if Days of Our Lives history is any indicator. And EJ and Kristen have been at odds and they’ve been battling each other ever since he snatched her mom, Rachel Blake (Roslyn Gentle), and hid her out of town.
He didn’t hurt her. He just hid her. But that way, the cops couldn’t force Kristen’s mom to testify against EJ. And this all started because horrible Arnold Feniger (Galen Gering), Rafe Hernandez’s doppelganger, showed up after years of being presumed dead. So, EJ decided to use Arnold, as he couldn’t get rid of him. And then they had to lock Rafe away. And then EJ ended up stashing him at a remote location where Rachel Blake was.
Advertisement
Kristen’s Mistake on DOOL
So, honestly, if Kristen had been smart, she would have just hidden her own mom away from the cops and then EJ wouldn’t have to have hidden her away. But instead, Kristen was basically encouraging her mom to testify against EJ because I mean, I guess just Kristen’s bat crap crazy that way. And that’s what led EJ’s niece Rachel Black (Lorelei Olivia Mote) to shoot him. And so Kristen’s blaming EJ for her evil twin daughter Rachel being in a psychiatric facility. Meanwhile, EJ knows what’s wrong is that her mom is toxic. Little Rachel’s mom. Honestly, you know, Kristen’s mom is, too. But Kristen can’t acknowledge her own parental failings.
Days of Our Lives: Kristen’s Twisted Manipulation
And even worse, little Rachel is soon distraught, balling her eyes out when Kristen and Brady Black (Eric Martsolf) comfort their daughter, who finds out her wicked little friend Sophia Choi (Rachel Boyd) is dead from an apparent suicide. What’s even more twisted is Kristen is comforting Rachel after she killed her best friend. Because Days of Our Lives viewers all know Kristen enticed Sophia to kill Johnny in exchange for a fresh start out of town. Kristen knew what buttons to push becuz Sophia hates Johnny. But it was always about Kristen trying to blame EJ for Rachel’s spiral and stint in the psych ward and punish him.
But after Kristen thought Johnny was dead, she double crossed Sophia, bludgeoned her in the head with a rock. The fake suicide with the note that framed Holly Jonas (Ashley Puzemis) for social media bullying was just one more twisted thing. Clearly, Kristen doesn’t mind killing other people’s children because she then had her henchman toss Sophia’s lifeless body into the murky water. When Kristen found out Johnny survived, of course, she was furious.
And now Kristen is faking sympathy for Johnny’s wife Chanel Dupree (Raven Bowens) having cancer. Kristen advised Johnny not to let Chanel’s medical crisis pull him back into EJ’s orbit. And then when Johnny said that EJ’s been great, I think that’s when Kristen decided to switch gears and focus on manipulating EJ’s other kids.
Advertisement
Sydney DiMera – EJ’s Troubled Daughter on Days
Sydney DiMera, his daughter, was Sami Brady‘s (Alison Sweeney) child. Kristen’s call to Sydney was completely out of the blue. If you recall, there’s been non-stop drama for EJ and his daughter from the very beginning. Back in 2009, Sami hid her pregnancy from EJ after they’d had a one night stand. And then Sami witnessed an assassination and she was put into witness protection. That was where she fell in love with FBI agent Rafe Hernandez (Galen Gering).
Meanwhile, Nicole Walker (Arianne Zucker) was also pregnant with EJ’s child, but Nicole miscarried and then she switched Sami’s baby with some other woman’s baby. So, Nicole ran off with Sydney becuz she wanted EJ’s kid. So, for the first part of her little life, Sami and EJ’s daughter, Sydney, was actually raised by Nicole. And after Rafe figured out the baby switcheroo, Nicole ran off with Sydney.
Days of our Lives: EJ’s Awful Revenge on Sami
And then there was this whole thing where EJ and Anna set up a staged kidnapping with bloody clothes and a fake rescue to look heroic. And this was all done by EJ to get revenge on Sami. So during her childhood, Sydney lived with Sami and then periodically with EJ amid custody battles and reconciliations and breakups.
And then Sydney’s dad, EJ, was killed off and was later resurrected with Kristen and Xander Cook Kiriakis’ (Paul Telfer) help, no less. EJ was in Kristen’s warehouse in Nashville where they kept all of Dr. Wilhelm Rolf’s (Richard Wharton) science projects with Xander doing all the caretaking.
Advertisement
So, poor Sydney is the epitome of a poor little rich girl. She’s been through so much and we’re expecting to see a recast teen Sydney DiMera soon. Recent episodes have had EJ in phone conversations with Sydney about coming home to Salem after school lets out in Italy. Her last appearance in Salem was on the 2021 Peacock series Days of Our Lives: A Very Salem Christmas. That time, Sydney had been recast and aged up a bit, with young tween actress Evelyn Stevenson.
Days of Our Live: Kristen DiMera – EJ DiMera
Kristen’s Nefarious Plan Against EJ on DOOL
And since 2014, Sami has had Sydney living in Europe with her and it’s been offscreen aside from that holiday special. But that may be about to change. So maybe her awful auntie Kristen calling her niece behind EJ’s back is, you know, going to simply be to encourage her not to come to Salem. It’s not like Sydney and Kristen have been close as far as we know. No doubt.
I think Sami wouldn’t encourage them to be close and wouldn’t like Kristen calling Sydney out of the blue like this. Kristen definitely has something nefarious up her sleeve. She may have set her sights on Sydney as her next target to torment EJ. I wouldn’t put it past Kristen to hurt Sydney. So, Kristen is clearly plotting to harm EJ and may use Sami or Sydney to make it happen.
Days of our Lives: Kristen & EJ at Each Other’s Throats
And this heated sibling feud between Kristen and EJ has been exacerbated by events like the DiMera kidnapping and the aftermath. Also by Rachel turning from bratty kid to tormented tween and of course by Kristen trying to kill Johnny. So EJ’s going to find out what Kristen did very soon. It should be by the end of this week or early next week when EJ figures out that Kristen used Sophia to try and kill Johnny. And of course, Sophia almost succeeded. I mean, heck, if she’d used the gun Kristen gave her, Sophia would have killed Johnny and EJ would be grieving right now.
So, once he figures out what Kristen did, EJ is going to threaten Kristen. It’s going to be more like a promise, I think. And it looks like at the very least EJ has her snatched, but maybe worse because remember, he threatened Kristen this week that she might need Dr. Rolf’s resurrection serum soon. But if Kristen knows her time is about to run out, we could see her amping up her schemes to wreck EJ’s relationships with both Johnny and Sydney before EJ can come for Kristen.
Advertisement
And we know EJ is going to lose it once he finds out Kristen was in contact with Sydney, especially after what she’s done with Johnny. Because I think EJ would rightly assume the worst that Kristen might have tried to kill Sydney, too. Let’s be real. While Kristen is obviously not afraid to use children, including her own daughter Rachel, to do her dirty work, I mean, Kristen has used Rachel as a pawn in her games with Brady for years. And once EJ finds this out, Kristen’s going to be toast.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login