The amount spent last year by Glasgow on hotels and bed and breakfast for the homeless was the highest ever.

Glasgow City Council spent a record sum of almost £70 million last year providing hotel and bed and breakfast accommodation to homeless people, mainly refugees.

Shock new figures released under Freedom of Information (FOI) show spending has more than tripled in the last four years. In the last financial year, 2025/26, the hotel and B&B bill was £67,815,500, compared to 45,292,346 in 2024/25, £26,724,422 in 2023/2 and £20,368,474 in 2023/23.

The same Glasgow City Council figures also show that 2773 homeless people are currently in hotel and bed and breakfast accommodation, of which 2030 are refugees.

The increase in spending has been blamed on a surge in migrants being given leave to remain after applying for asylum in the UK, after the Conservatives failed to process applications when they were in power.

Refugees have a legal right to be housed in Scotland that does not exist in England.

The FOI figures also show that 109 families with children are currently living in hotels and B&B and 2990 homeless people were refused temporary accommodation of any type last year.

The information was obtained by the Scottish Tenants Organisation (STO) who are calling instead for the money to be used to build modular prefabricated homes and more council housing.

The STO claim last year’s £67.8 million could instead build 1500 of the prefabs at £45,000 a time.

Campaign co-ordinator Sean Clerkin said:”These latest homeless statistics reveal that we are in the middle of a housing and homeless catastrophe in Glasgow where the profiteers of homeless misery got nearly £70 million from Glasgow City Council in 205/26.

“The number of refugees with the right to remain is still very high and Glasgow cannot cope with this without help.

“The only beneficiaries of this scandal are the owners of the hotels used to house the homeless.”

The STO are also calling for a summit involving the Home Office and the Scottish Government to come up with a proper plan for the homeless and to treat Glasgow as a special case.

Shelter Scotland Director, Alison Watson added;”It is the lack of social housing driving up homelessness costs as it forces councils to keep relying on expensive temporary accommodation.

“Building more would save money and prevent cuts to local services. Unless more social homes are built, the housing emergency will only get worse and local authorities cannot tackle it alone.

“The next government must provide more support to the areas that need it most.

“Everyone deserves a home, whether they are fleeing violence abroad or from a partner. Yet people in Glasgow have been failed for many years.”

One 55 year old woman, who asked not to be named, said she had lived in 15 different hotels and B&B in Glasgow in the last 14 months, after being made homeless last year.

The woman, who has a degree in Design and has worked as a college lecturer, says the standards of accommodation is poor and has been exposed to drugs, violence and other criminality.

She said:”I have asthma and the living conditions have made that worse.

“I have been offered crack cocaine and some of the women residents are targeted by kerb crawlers and men looking for sex.

“It can be quite a terrifying experience being in these places.”

As well as hotels and B&B homeless people can also be placed in furnished flats and shelters.

A Glasgow City Council spokeswoman said: “We are very aware of the rising cost of our hotel accommodation bill which has tripled over the past few years.

“A proportion of emergency accommodation costs are recouped via housing benefit and dialogue with Scottish Government remains ongoing in seeking possible longer-term solutions.

“Routine efforts are made to share the burden across Scotland however due to demand, we have been required to expand the use of bed and breakfast accommodation to meet our statutory duties.

“Anyone who finds themselves unintentionally homeless has the right to apply for help from any local authority in Scotland.

“Glasgow’s historic reputation for helping support refugees makes us an attractive city and why many are travelling here to build a new life.”

Jamie Varley, 37, a minute later sent a second text to his boyfriend, John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, saying: “Jokes. Just give me a call when done.”

The defendants had adopted 13-month-old Preston Davey at their home in Blackpool in April 2023, Preston Crown Court heard.

Varley, from Grimsargh, is accused of the murder of the child and McGowan-Fazakerley of allowing the death of the child, with both accused of sexual abuse, the trial, now in its second week, has heard.

The text messages were sent on July 10, just four days after Preston had been admitted to Blackpool Victoria Hospital for a third time, after earlier visits in May and June.

Preston Davey (Image: Lancashire Police)

On the morning of July 6 2023, Varley took Preston to hospital with an injury to his elbow.

He told hospital staff he was lowering the baby into his cot the night before when the child jumped or kicked his feet and he heard a pop or click in his left elbow.

An X-ray confirmed a small fracture and his arm was put in a cast.

Later the child’s social worker, Amy Shepherdson, who had been in contact with the hospital, texted Varley to say: “Just to reassure you they said they had absolutely no concerns.

“U absolutely did the right thing.”

Ms Shepherdson visited their home later that day, noting that Preston looked pale and was not himself, adding: “He tried to smile several times but then this changed to a very sad face and a little cry.”

Jurors were also shown a text exchange between Varley and his friend, Tanya Tingle, telling her: “We did it we think…not on purpose but caught him when falling.”

A day later the family had a home visit from Helen Magee, an independent reviewer from Oldham social services.

In her report of the visit, apparently addressed to the baby, she wrote: “You were happy there with both your daddies. And this made me ponder a little as to whether there was a problem that I couldn’t see. I decided there wasn’t an issue…”

Dr Alberto Elbo, an orthopaedic surgeon, treated Preston at the fracture clinic the following week, when Varley brought him in.

Jurors were shown notes from the meeting he had dictated which said he was told the injury to the arm was from Preston being placed and strapped in a car seat and nothing to do with a cot.

Peter Wright KC, prosecuting, asked Dr Elbo about this explanation involving a car seat.

Dr Elbo said: “That’s what dad told me. What I understood from that day was he was being strapped in his car seat. That’s all I had in my mind when I dictated that letter.”

Nick Johnson KC, defending Varley suggested to the witness he had been told the injury came about due to a “cot” not a “car”.

“I don’t think so,” Dr Elbo replied.

Preston was born on June 16 2022, immediately taken into care by Oldham Council, and placed with foster parents at five days old.

After undergoing an assessment and familiarisation process in early 2023 he was adopted and began living with the defendants on April 1 at their home.

Varley took a year off work as head of year and as a design and technology teacher at a local high school, South Shore Academy, to look after the child, but struggled as a new parent with a baby who frequently woke during the night and with his partner working long hours, the court heard.

During the four months the baby was under their adoption he was allegedly routinely ill-treated, had indecent images and videos taken of him, was sexually abused and physically assaulted.

On July 27 2023 Preston was again brought in to the hospital by the defendants, unconscious and in a state of cardiac arrest, and medics could not revive him.

Varley told police the child accidentally drowned in a bath, but this was inconsistent with the post-mortem examination which discovered the child had suffered 40 traumatic injuries, the court heard.

Varley denies murder, manslaughter, two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty to a child, grievous bodily harm, sexual assault of a child, 13 counts of taking indecent photos or videos of a child, one of distributing an indecent photo of a child, to his co-accused, and one of making an indecent photo.

McGowan-Fazakerley denies allowing the death of a child, three counts of child cruelty and one count of the sexual assault of a child.

The trial was adjourned until Tuesday next week.

A cafe and treatment rooms are amongst the features set out in the proposal

A former chapel which dates back to 1803 could become a health and wellness facility under new plans. The Crescent Wellness Club has submitted an application to convert a Grade II Listed building, formerly Wesleyan Chapel and The Masonic Hall, on The Crescent in Wisbech into a health and wellness centre and cafe.

The applicant said it is is seeking to restore a historic building to its “full potential as a vibrant community hub focused on wellbeing, connection, and shared use.”

The developer added: “The Crescent Wellness Club (applicant’s business name) is a wellbeing and community-focused space in Wisbech, bringing a historic building back into active use while preserving its character. The space will provide a welcoming and inclusive environment supporting physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing, alongside community and creative use.”

The application also wants to use the health facility as a community space. The centre would host mental health and wellbeing workshops, therapy and group support sessions, seasonal and community events and creative activities. Occasional event days are proposed to “bring people together”, with part of the profits proposed to be reinvested into local community projects.

If approved, the basement would be used for yoga, Pilates, reformer Pilates, and sound healing meanwhile the ground floor would feature a reception, a cafe offering locally sourced food and therapy and treatment rooms. On the first floor, dance and fitness classes, creative workshops and group wellbeing and therapy sessions are proposed.

If successful, the building would be open between 7am and 9pm on weekdays and from 8am to 6pm on weekends. The cafe would operate between 9am and 5pm and the therapy rooms would remain open between 9am and 5pm.

A heritage statement for the proposals states that the development seeks to “structurally strengthen elements, remove modern un-sympathetic alterations, erect new elements to increase the building footprint and in-turn its usability and reinstate original features”.

The proposals will be considered by Fenland District Council.

Manchester United face Liverpool on Sunday in what is always one of the biggest Premier League fixtures of the season and a win will guarantee Champions League football returns to Old Trafford next season.

There is plenty going on in M16 at the moment. United are targeting third in the Premier League and Michael Carrick is moving closer to landing the head coach job on a permanent basis.

There was another boost this week when Kobbie Mainoo signed a new five-year deal and plans are afoot to reshape the midfield in the summer, with a partner for Mainoo the top priority. So plenty to get stuck into and I’ve answered some of your questions on the current state of play at Old Trafford below.

Click here to find out the latest Manchester United news in our daily newsletter

We run weekly question and answer sessions, so click here to submit your questions, and we’ll answer them next week. Here are the answers to some of this week’s questions:

Michael Carrick has produced tremendous results and we have all seen the positivity. Why are we still looking for another candidate?

Carrick is certainly the frontrunner for this job and, personally, I would be surprised if he didn’t get the job. But United insisted it would be a thorough process back in January and they intend to stick to that.

There are some unknowns around Carrick. He has been impressive, but it is still a small sample size really, and next season will offer a very different challenge, with more games and less time on the training ground.

United have looked at options and done due diligence on head coaches. They are aware some big names aren’t available. It feels like it’s down to Carrick, or going for one of those Premier League-proven options in Andoni Iraola or Oliver Glasner.

They both also have questions to answer in terms of stepping up to a bigger job, so the sensible option here looks to be Carrick.

Will we go for a big-name coach, but I think the job is too big for former players?

And here is the alternative view. I can understand why some supporters still harbour doubts about the 44-year-old. He wouldn’t have got this job in January without his distinguished, 464-game playing career at Old Trafford.

His record at Middlesbrough was okay, but it wasn’t screaming future Manchester United coach. He has taken his chance, however, and I actually think having experience of the club is a benefit. He has been a much calmer presence than both Erik ten Hag and Ruben Amorim, who were swallowed up by the size of the club.

Then there is who qualifies as a big-name coach. Thomas Tuchel, Julian Nagelsmann, Carlo Ancelotti and Luis Enrique all look to be out of reach for one reason or another.

We’ve seen some impressive Premier League bosses struggle when stepping up from those mid-level clubs recently, so Iraola and Glasner come with risks. That’s why all roads currently seem to lead to Carrick.

Instead of looking for expensive signings, can we not use current players at the academy and give them performance-related contracts?

I think we’ll see more academy players get chances next season. Midfield is certainly an area to watch, with Casemiro leaving and United likely to try and sell Manuel Ugarte.

There is a chance they try and sign three new midfielders, but I think the more likely course of action is to sign two and then use academy options as the sixth first-team option next season. Jim Thwaites impressed in Ireland and could do it, while Tyler Fletcher has been around the first team in the second half of the season. Jack Moorhouse is also well-liked at United.

The other one to watch next season is Shea Lacey. He turned 19 last month and is now a full-time member of the first team squad. He will get minutes next season.

Why would United not keep Casemiro, even if he only plays Premier League games or does 45 minutes in some games? He brings so much experience and knowledge.

There is a lot of love around for Casemiro at the moment and nobody seems ready to say goodbye, but that is what will be happening over the next four games.

The timing feels right. He is 34 now and is going out on a high. He has benefited this season from a reduced schedule, but won’t have that luxury next season.

And the reason he won’t stay for a reduced role is partly that he would probably want more, but mostly because it’s just not value for money. His salary would be around £350,000-a-year next season and with Ineos determined to cut the wage bill, that just doesn’t make sense for them.

Could Mason Greenwood play for Manchester United again?

We get a few questions on Greenwood here and there and you can understand why. He’s had another excellent season in France, with 25 goals and 10 assists in 42 games, but the chances of a return to Old Trafford are pretty much non-existent.

United tried to reintegrate him in the summer of 2023, but the backlash was fierce and they shelved those plans. They can’t and won’t try to do so again, regardless of his ability.

They could profit from a sell-on clause and there has to be a chance he moves on from Marseille, but it’s difficult to see any Premier League club signing him and they would pay the biggest fees.

May Day events took place across the United States in major cities like Seattle, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Chicago and Washington DC.

More than a thousand protesters in the Los Angeles May Day Coalition marched through the streets of the city’s downtown in support of workers’ rights.

Meanwhile in New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani praised unions and called for stronger protections for working people at a rally in Washington Square Park.

Brent crude oil surged to US$126 (£94) a barrel after US president Donald Trump announced that he was willing to prolong the blockade of Iranian ports for “months if needed”. This conflict has been billed as a matter of who can absorb the most pain. And Trump is betting on it being the US.

Trump has been rather bullish in his public pronouncements of late, declaring that Iran is in a “state of collapse”. Reports that the country’s inflation rate has risen to 50% from 40% since the war began at the end of February would seem to back this assessment.

The damage done to Iran’s economy will be made worse if the country is forced to shut down oil production due to a lack of storage capacity, something Trump is also confident about. He told Axios: “The blockade is somewhat more effective than the bombing. They are choking like a stuffed pig.”

Now in its eighth week, the conflict is having knock-on effects throughout the region and beyond. Perhaps the most telling sign this week was the announcement by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that it was quitting Opec, the oil producers’ cartel.

Adi Imsirovic, an energy expert at the University of Oxford, believes that while this decision has been brewing for some time – UAE and Opec’s de facto leader, Saudi Arabia, are at loggerheads over the civil war in Yemen and conflicts in Sudan and across the Horn of Africa. But the war has sharpened political sensibilities across the Gulf. Abu Dhabi has been unhappy about the lack of support from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) after being on the receiving end of intense bombardment from Iran.

Meanwhile, it has chafed under production quotas imposed by the cartel, which it sees as being well short – unfairly so – of its production capacity. When the Strait of Hormuz opens and countries begin to restock their reserves, UAE believes it can cash in on increased demand.

For Imsirovic, the episode reveals something deeper: as the transition by much of the world to retool their economies away from dependence on fossil fuels, big producers like the UAE worry about being left with oil in the ground that nobody wants. Hence the desire to pump out more oil without being constrained by Opec quotas.

À lire aussi :
UAE’s departure from Opec tells a story about the limited future of oil production

Another question inevitably raised by the Middle East conflict and the chokehold that the Strait of Hormuz has over energy markets is why nobody has figured out an alternative route. After all, Iran has been threatening to close the strait whenever threatened since the early 1980s.

The fact is, various countries have figured out an alternative route, writes David B. Roberts of King’s College London; it’s just not big enough to cope. The East-West Pipeline (or Petroline) can pipe oil across the Saudi peninsula at a rate of 5-7 million barrels a day. This compares with an estimated 20 million barrels that transit the Strait of Hormuz in normal times.

The Abu Dhabi crude oil pipeline, which takes oil from the Habshan onshore field in Abu Dhabi and runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman handles less than 2 million barrels per day. Both pipelines have been damaged by Iran during the war. And both were operating before the Strait of Hormuz was closed, so the idea that these pipelines can replace the strait is not feasible.

À lire aussi :
What alternatives do Gulf states have to the Strait of Hormuz?

Trump assassination attempt

It was shocking and depressing to read of another apparent attempt on the US president’s life – the third in two years – at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday. It was the first of these dinners that Trump had attended since 2011 when he was famously the butt of Barack Obama’s jokes in the by-now familiar comedy “roast” that is traditionally a highlight of the evening.

A man armed with two guns and a knife attempted to enter the ballroom where the dinner was being held, so the principals were evacuated and the dinner broke up in disarray. It later emerged that the would-be assassin had written a “manifesto” in which he revealed his hatred for the US president.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt blamed what she called “hateful and constant and violent rhetoric directed at President Trump”, which she said had “helped to legitimise this violence and bring us to this dark moment”. She pointed the finger at the US Democrats and “some in the media”.

Seeking to link the assassination attempt to political rhetoric is a pretty direct attack on the first amendment to the US constitution, which protects free speech, writes Eliza Bechtold, a US constitutional law expert at the University of Oxford. The Trump administration has a track record of lionising the first amendment when it suits them (the January 6 US Capitol rioters were characterised by some as peaceful protesters exercising first amendment rights). But attacking the media or the Democrats for their criticisms of Trump’s administration is, writes Bechtold, a denial of everything the first amendment was designed to do.

À lire aussi :
Trump uses assassination attempt to justify his assault on first amendment rights to free speech

But not everyone in Trump’s Maga movement is now singing from the authorised songbook, writes Clodagh Harrington of the University of Cork. First it was Marjorie Taylor Greene, once a fervent Trump fan in the House of Representatives, now a bitter critic – who jumped ship in 2025, largely due to what she sees as his mishandling of the Epstein files.

More recently, it has been former Fox host Tucker Carlson, who has gone from introducing Trump at election rallies in 2024, to apologising to the US public for “misleading” them into voting for Trump. For Carlson, it’s the Iran war that flies in the face of one of Trump’s core election promises: no new wars.

Mind you, Harrington notes, Carlson’s move may also be dictated by a dream to launch his own presidential run in 2028. A TV personality running for president? Well, it has been known.

À lire aussi :
Is Trump losing the support of his Maga base?

The Moon moves into sync with Jupiter, bringing clarity around goals and visions. Gain a new perspective today.

Taurus, Aries and Gemini, this placement is all about sharing your ideas with those who matter. It’s tieme for brainstorming and deep conversations.

Don’t be afraid to make waves, and maybe even rock the boat. You’re developing by leaps and bounds, so don’t let anyone hold you back.

Ahead, you’ll find all star signs’ horoscopes for today: Saturday May 2, 2026.

Like checking your horoscope every morning? You can now sign up to our free daily newsletter to get a personalised reading for your star sign delivered straight to your inbox.

To order your unique personal horoscope based on your time, date and place of birth, visit patrickarundell.com.

Aries

March 21 to April 20

Whereas yesterday, when your thoughts and emotions could have been more intense, there’s an opportunity today, as the Moon arcs towards the vibrant Jupiter, to view things in a different light. It may be that a heart-to-heart with someone close over the weekend can also help you to gain a different perspective, but in a positive way. It will feel good to move on.

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aries

Taurus

April 21 to May 21

Jupiter has been helping you over the last nine months to think about things in different ways, and also to gain additional knowledge, but also to share your great ideas too. And today, it could be really joyful to share your insights with someone in a way that can help them too. Close relationships can seem less on edge today, and with a greater sense of mutual give and take.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Taurus

Gemini

May 22 to June 21

Over the last few days, you’ve been able to appreciate the solid citizens in your world, but there is still a feeling that new and more exciting opportunities can open up for you. And yet what you can do is blend this optimism today with some practicality, particularly when you’re considering resources or any ways or ideas you have to improve your financial situation.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Gemini

Cancer

June 22 to July 23

You’ve been given food for thought about managing your time, particularly as there seems to be quite a few competing considerations. But one thing you can feel today with the Moon in the warm and affectionate part of your chart and her link back to the supportive Jupiter in your sign, is a sense that whatever path you choose, you will be supported and protected.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Cancer

Leo

July 24 to August 23

The newly arrived Venus and Uranus in the most social of sectors are going to bring some sparkle and effervescence to your interactions in times to come. But today, it could be just a moment of connection or deeper thought that helps you to understand something that may have just been holding you back a little bit for some while, and that can feel really uplifting.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Leo

Virgo

August 24 to September 23

Radical Uranus is pushing you to step outside your comfort zone, shake things up, and approach your connection to the wider world in a fresh and exciting way. But it’s your timeless ability to analyse and structure information in a practical way which can impress someone you encounter today, along with your can-do attitude, and cheerful friendliness.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Virgo

Libra

September 24 to October 23

Even if you are working within a budget, there’s going to be part of you that may want to squeeze from that some kind of extra slice of enjoyment or treat. This could be something relatively inexpensive, but after quite a period of being very disciplined, a much more liberated side of you needs to come out, which may see you snaffle something more lush.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Libra

Scorpio

October 24 to November 22

Whilst you may have been considering some relationship dynamics yesterday, and you could still be processing these, you can just feel much more carefree today as the Moon in your sign forges a lovely link with the exuberant Jupiter, which is exalted in its current home in your fellow water sign of Cancer. This combination is perfect for feeling more happy-go-lucky.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Scorpio

Sagittarius

November 23 to December 21

There’s a wonderful sparkle in the part of your chart that sees you connect to others, but particularly those people who are not only charismatic but also genuine and relatable. So why have you been working through some sensitive thoughts over the last 24 hours? Well, the Moon is in the tenderest part of her journey, but is more supported today, as you’ll be too.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Sagittarius

Capricorn

December 22 to January 21

Last June, when the fortune bringer Jupiter returned to your sector of relating for the first time in many years, you may have hoped that significant developments around relationships would follow, and they may have done. It’s just that, ironically, your ruler, Saturn, inhibited his potential, but not so today, when a friendly, perhaps even flirty conversation, can add uplift.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Capricorn

Aquarius

January 22 to February 19

There’s an unfair archetype about Water Bearers that you must be quirky and out there. And yet, the chances are, if this is within you, it will start to come through increasingly in the months to come, now that your modern ruler is in such a playful, mischievous location. But you can use that sense of fun to adjust and adapt to even tricky work-life issues, as today can show.

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aquarius

Pisces

February 20 to March 20

Yesterday may have coincided with some more intense discussions or conversations. This may have led to something being pushed into the open. And now it’s been ventilated, you can start to see things in a different way and release whatever it was that was occupying your emotions. Indeed, more novel ways of dealing with home and family issues will become a theme.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Pisces

Your daily Metro.co.uk horoscope is here every morning, seven days a week (yes, including weekends!). To check your forecast, head to our dedicated horoscopes page.

Head here for this week’s tarot horoscope reading, and see what the cards have in store for you!

Check out the tarot horoscope reading for the month of May here.

Prefer us to the others? Then tell Google!

As a loyal Metro reader, we want to make sure you never miss our stories when searching for your news. Whether it is the latest politics news explained, live football coverage or a showbiz scoop.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

Advertisement

MORE: Daily horoscope May 1, 2026: Today’s predictions for your star sign

MORE: The Full Moon in Scorpio exposes secret desires — your star sign’s tarot horoscope

MORE: Daily horoscope April 30, 2026: Today’s predictions for your star sign

Game show Name That Tune began in the mid-1950s, originating in the United States on NBC Radio in 1952.

It sees contestants pitted against each other as their music knowledge is put to the test.

ITV is reviving the series, which last aired in the late 1990s, with TV star Alison Hammond set to host.

ITV reviving iconic show Name That Tune after 28 years with Alison Hammond

The British version first aired on UK TV back in 1976 and became a 15-minute slot on the popular entertainment series Wednesday at Eight, which went on to become London Night Out.

However, because the game was so popular, producers Thames Television decided to turn Name That Tune into a half-hour weekly series in 1983.

From 1976 until 1983, it was hosted by Tom O’Connor, with Lionel Blair taking over in 1984 until the series was dropped from the ITV schedules in 1988.

In 1997, the series was revived on Channel 5 with Jools Holland as the host for two series in 1997 and 1998.

The new series will be its first return to television since then.

The new series, hosted by Alison Hammond, will see contestants go up against each other as their music knowledge is put to the test in a series of fast-paced rounds.

It will feature tracks from the world’s best-loved artists and bands from across every genre – all building towards the finale. 

Name That Tune is currently in its fifth season in the U.S, presented by 30 Rock’s Jane Krakowski.

The show’s band will also be performing in the new UK version, made up of a group of elite musicians who have performed with some of the world’s biggest stars, including Adele and The Spice Girls.

Alison said:  “As a massive music lover, my biggest challenge as a host will be trying not to grab the mic and start singing along when one of my all-time favourite tunes comes on!

“And trust me… that will take serious self-control!

“I grew up absolutely loving the original show, so being part of this now feels like a real full-circle moment.

 “I cannot wait to get into the studio, put the contestants through their paces, and see who really knows their music.

“And let me tell you, being joined by the super-talented Name That Tune band, who’ll be belting out some of the biggest songs on the planet in their own unique, electric style… oh, it’s going to be next-level.

“Bigger, louder, and more feel-good than ever, this is going to be EPIC!”

 Katie Rawcliffe, Director of Entertainment, Reality & Daytime at ITV, added: “Name That Tune is such an iconic brand, we are excited to be bringing this refreshed global format to the UK audience.

“It’s a fun family series that not only sees contestants challenged in the studio, but viewers can play along with all the family, providing a unique playlist that spans generations.”

ITV’s 7 Up series to conclude in 2026 after 62 years

The news comes as another classic ITV series is set to end this year after more than six decades.

Referred to as the Up series, it began back in 1964 with 7 Up, which follows the lives of ten boys and four girls in England when they were seven years old, and has followed up with them every seven years.

The series has been produced by Granada Television for ITV, which has aired all of the films except 42 Up, which was broadcast on BBC One.

The final film, called 70 Up, will join the participants for the last time as they reflect on their triumphs, trials and tribulations and what happened to their hopes and dreams.

Recommended reading:

Jo Clinton-Davis, controller of factual ITV and commissioner of 70 Up said: “The 7 Up story is much more than a TV documentary, it’s a document of our times.

“A truly distinctive landmark piece of film-making that has become part of our cultural fabric.

“In the evolving stories of our cast we see the universal themes of life play out. It is the series that made me want to get into television.”

Will you be watching Name That Tune when it returns? Let us know in the comments.