There are now around 7000 cameras around the UK’s road network, and in 2022, they resulted in the prosecution of 245,043 people – the highest figure since records began. 

The Jenoptik VECTOR-SR is the latest in speed camera tech. It can catch drivers speeding on either side of the road and see inside cars.

This means it can catch drivers who aren’t wearing a seatbelt or using a mobile phone while driving.

The cameras don’t flash either, so it might be difficult for motorists to tell if they’ve been caught. 

Louise Thomas, a motor insurance expert at Confused.com, said: “Ultra speed cameras are a big advance in comparison to the standard speed camera which many drivers are used to. Not only will these cameras be able to detect drivers speeding on either side of the road, but they’re also able to see inside driver’s vehicles too.

“That’s as it uses technology to see if drivers are wearing their seatbelt or if they’re breaking driving laws, such as using their mobile phone or other handheld devices.

“Some drivers might be concerned about these new cameras being an invasion of their privacy, but their purpose is to keep all road users safe.

“These cameras can reduce the risk of distracted driving, which tie in with important changes made to the Highway Code earlier in the year. This included changes to how drivers use technology in their cars while driving, and harsher punishments for those who don’t follow the new rules.

“Driving while distracted could lead to fines, points or even prosecution. For example, using your phone when behind the wheel could result in a £200 fine and up to 6 points on your license.

“So although the introduction of ultra cameras might be an annoyance to some, their purpose is to ultimately make our roads safer and to reduce the risk of drivers facing punishments as a result.”

Police have deployed extra patrols in parks across west London in the hunt for a suspected dog poisoner. 

Dog walkers have said they are ‘terrified’ after contaminated meat, which was found in Holland Park, west London, last week, left one pet dog seriously ill and killed two foxes.

The mystery poisoner also targeted Brompton Cemetery, triggering a Met police inquiry. 

They have warned pet owners of the danger as they trawl for key CCTV  footage that could unmask the poisoner. 

A Met Police statement said: ‘It has been brought to our attention from several sources that meat (Chicken) has been left in both Holland Park and Brompton Cemetery. A dog has consumed this meat and become very unwell and two foxes have been found dead (with no obvious signs of injury).

‘We believe that this meat may contain toxins and has been left on purpose to either harm foxes or dogs. The meat has been seen over several days so please remain vigilant and do not allow your dogs to scavenge. In Brompton Cemetery dogs should remain on leads at all times. 

‘Any further reports or information please get in contact. Do share this with all dog owners and walkers.’ 

Dog walkers in Holland Park said they feared for their pooches and have been exchanging messages via a WhatsApp group on any suspicious food left in the park. 

They are also on the lookout for the poisoner, who they described as a ‘disgusting’ person. 

Professional dog walker Daniel Palfi told Metro: ‘We are on high alert. Obviously it’s very worrying and they need to catch this person. It’s disgusting what they are doing.

‘It’s hard to imagine what kind of person could do this.’

Kailu Stabile, who was walking a Lurcher, called Moriarty, said: ‘Moriarty is not a big scavenger but to think that there is poison in the park is terrible.

‘We dog walkers communicate a lot and we are always on the lookout. It’s really horrible that anyone would do this.’

There is a police office in the park and they are trawling though any CCTV from around the area, including from the Belvedere restaurant which is in the grounds.

Meanwhile they are deploying extra patrols with a police vehicle circling the park as the hunt for the poisoner continues.

Carlotta Pironti, who was walking her Cavapoo called Nelson, told Metro: ‘People are terrified. It’s difficult to stop the dogs going for any food left on the ground. Why someone would do something so evil I don’t know.’ 

Parks police officers have been liaising with dog walkers and urging them to be extra vigilant. 

In Brompton cemetery dog walkers and those visiting graves said the poisoning was an act of ‘desecration’. 

Steven Murray 41, who was waking his French Bulldog Betty through Brompton Cemetery, told Metro: ‘I hadn’t heard about this I think it’s horrible and very said that someone would do this. They I must hate animals it’s just very scary. Some people do leave food out for the foxes which is fair enough but if there’s stuff with poison we need to know. I’m going to be extra careful.’

A woman who was walking her Lurcher dogs, Tarka and Raffy, told Metro:  ‘It’s really awful maybe it’s someone has personal vendetta or something. It’s very odd and quite scary.’ 

A pensioner who lives nearby said: ‘I come to the cemetery for some peace and quiet. To think someone is laying poison in a graveyard is desecration in my opinion.’

Anyone with information is asked to call police on 101. 

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE: Man accused of Primrose Hill murder tells court ‘police got the wrong person’

MORE: ‘Unbelievably cute’ village crowned one of the best places to visit from London

MORE: Husband’s regret after wife fell overboard during Bahamas boat trip in bad weather

The world economy survived the shocks of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, which has had limited impact on economic growth. But the escalation of hostilities in the Middle East has transformed what had been, until early 2026, a surprisingly benign outlook into a far more uncertain one. It has created the ultimate test for how resilient the world economy really is.

Amid stalled ceasefire negotiations, the US president, Donald Trump, has threatened a blockade of vessels transiting through Iranian ports in the strait of Hormuz. This sent oil prices back up over US$100 (£74) a barrel. Meanwhile the current ceasefire is looking very shaky.

The key economic factor in this conflict is straightforward: the near-halting of shipments through the strait and the closure of energy infrastructure.

These elements have disrupted roughly one-fifth of global oil production and nearly another 20% of the world’s trade in liquefied natural gas (LNG). With little spare capacity elsewhere, the result has been a sharp and rapid surge in energy prices.

Forecasts of price surges for benchmark oils

This is a classic energy price shock. The consequences for the world economy are predictable in direction but uncertain in magnitude. The latest interim economic outlook from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) projects global GDP growth at 2.9% in 2026. This is almost unchanged from its forecast before the war started.

But the OECD report also highlights the conflict’s expected consequences: energy exporters gain from improved terms of trade, while importers – including most of Europe, Japan, Korea, and much of emerging Asia – face a squeeze on real incomes.

For example, US growth has been revised up by 0.3 percentage points (to 2%) while growth in the euro area and the UK have been revised down by 0.4 and 0.5 percentage points respectively.

When it comes to inflation, exporters and importers face similar cost increases. Inflation is expected to increase everywhere, with headline inflation in the group of G20 countries predicted to rise by 1.2 percentage points to 4%. The European Central Bank (ECB) has made similar predictions for growth and inflation.

But these estimates are based on specific (and possibly optimistic) assumptions about energy prices. In their baseline scenarios, energy prices are expected to peak below US$100 per barrel this quarter and begin falling gradually from the middle of the year – as priced in by oil futures markets.

And what about less benign scenarios such as a resumption of the conflict or Trump’s threatened blockade limiting traffic in the strait of Hormuz? Energy prices could stay higher for longer and would be unlikely to be eased by a temporary ceasefire.

The here and now

The most immediate impact of the war on the global economy has been a sharp shortage of distillate fuels, particularly gasoil and jet fuel. This disruption comes at a time of seasonally high demand, driven by agricultural planting and the approach of peak holiday travel, when air traffic typically rises.

Gulf oil producers are key suppliers of these fuels to Asian markets, leaving countries such as South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Australia especially vulnerable to supply constraints.

Compounding the problem, crude oil from the Gulf is particularly suited to producing jet fuel and diesel, and cannot easily be replaced by refining alternative grades of oil. As a result, distillate prices in affected markets have surged dramatically, in some cases rising by as much as 200%.

Further blockage of the strait will starve the global market of at least 10% of its demand. This would result in a “demand destruction” (the curtailment of demand for road and air travel in particular) that can only be achieved through raised prices.

If the war in Iran were to go on just for another couple of months, prices for Brent could reach US$120 per barrel. Six months of conflict could see prices exceed US$200 a barrel. This is because supply losses are cumulative – as commercial and strategic reserves are depleted, the supply risk increases.

Oil price projections if the hostilities continue

The ECB’s March 2026 projections for the euro area incorporate some of these scenarios. For example, in what it calls an adverse scenario where oil prices peak at US$120 and decline slowly, economic growth in the euro area becomes negative for 2026.

And in its most pessimistic scenario, oil prices shoot even higher (US$140), which results in a deeper recession and inflation reaching more than 6%.

The last two scenarios are the perfect example of the stagflationary world that policymakers dread: contracting output and high inflation. In this environment, the levers that they have at their disposal are severely constrained.

Central banks face a classic dilemma: raising interest rates to contain inflation risks slowing growth even more. But cutting them to encourage spending and faster growth risks increasing prices at precisely the wrong moment. The ECB’s data-dependent, meeting-by-meeting approach is the right posture, but it offers no easy exits.

Fiscal policy faces its own challenges. Governments will be tempted to protect households and firms from higher energy costs, as they did after the 2022 energy crisis. Some targeted support for the most vulnerable would be legitimate and necessary, but broad subsidies that suppress energy prices send the wrong signal.

Countries that import energy have become poorer, and policies that negate this fact will only sustain energy demand at a time when the opposite approach is required. Put simply, everyone needs to be more efficient or use less energy. And let’s not forget that governments, because of high levels of debt, now have even less fiscal room to support the economy through this crisis. With no clear path out of the hostilities, the resilience of the global economy is facing a very tough test.

Adam Ahmed has been jailed after he knifed two men, a man in his 20s and another in his 40s during the attack on Roker Avenue in Sunderland on June 21, 2025.

Ahmed, now 30, was arrested at the scene and charged with attempted murder in relation to both men.

He was later found guilty of one count of attempted murder in relation to one of the victims and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm in relation to the other.

Following his trial in December, Ahmed has today (April 13), appeared at Newcastle Crown Court and was sentenced to 27 years in prison and a further five on licence.

Speaking after sentencing, Chief Inspector Ian Blakemore, of Northumbria Police, said: “Two men sustained significant injuries in this very serious incident, and it was quickly established that this was an isolated incident involving people who were known to each other.

“Adam Ahmed was swiftly arrested and charged, and the outstanding work of all involved with the investigation means the person responsible for this attack is now facing a lengthy spell behind bars.

“We recognise the concern incidents of this nature can cause in our communities.

“Violence is never the answer – when incidents do occur we will take robust action and seek to bring offenders to face justice.”

People can save an extra bit of money by following the ‘online’ advice

TV money personality and personal finance expert Laura Pomfret has shared a money-saving tip for anyone with a passport. Speaking on today’s (April 13) episode of BBC Morning Live, hosted by Helen Skelton and Gethin Jones, she shared a cost-effective, time-saving piece of advice ‘people may not know about’.

Her advice comes as the cost of renewing a British passport rose at the start of the month. From April 8, the price of a standard online adult application rose from £94.50 to £102, surpassing £100 for the very first time. Child passports also increased, jumping to £66.50 from £61.50, reflecting a roughly 8% hike intended to reduce the taxpayer burden.

Laura told viewers: “It is becoming a bigger and bigger expense to get a passport for you, loved ones, for your family, and fees have just gone up. It is now over £100 to get a passport, but there are ways of avoiding paying more than you need.”

Sharing her tip to avoid paying extra when renewing your passport, she said that people who renew online can take their own pictures, rather than going to a photo booth and paying even more to get it printed. She said: “If you’ve not renewed your passport for a while, you may not know that you can take your photos yourself.”

She went on: “You don’t have to pay to go into a shop, you don’t have to go to one of the passport booths.” She said the official Gov.uk website gives you guidance when uploading your own photo, saying: “You need good lighting and a plain background, you upload it directly.”

She added: “It tells you if it’s not any good and you have to do it again. So, all in all, I think it’s worth having a look, if you need to get a new passport, at these different ways of saving money, because it’s worth it in the long run, especially more than one.”

Offering further passport guidance for Brits, Laura urged viewers to only ever renew online via the official Gov.uk HM Passport Office website. She warned: “There are these intermediary websites that might look official to help you fill out the application, but it’s not HM Passport Office.

“It’s an intermediary and you could pay up to £100, just for essentially help doing the passport, so make sure when you do it online you’re going directly to the Passport Office.” She also recommended renewing passports online rather than by post, as it costs less and saves time.

She said: “I advise you to do it yourself online. It takes about 10 minutes. But if you’re a bit unsure, you can use the Post Office check and send service. You’re paying £16 for this, but actually to get it done properly, it may be worth you deciding to use that service.”

You must renew your passport before you can travel if either your passport has expired or you do not have enough time left on it. How much time you need for your passport depends on the country you’re visiting. Check the entry requirements of the country you want to travel to.

The practice of ‘flipping’ homes – buying and reselling properties within 12 months – has plummeted to its lowest level in over a decade across England and Wales, new analysis reveals.

Property firm Hamptons, using Land Registry data, found the number of homes being flipped halved from 21,520 in 2016 to 10,570 in 2025.

This now accounts for just 1.5% of housing transactions in 2025, down from 2.0% in 2024, marking the lowest proportion in over 10 years. The number of flipped properties is the lowest since 2012, with the proportion being the least since 2013.

The property firm said a “long slowdown” was recorded following the introduction of the second home stamp duty surcharge in 2016.

Hamptons said that last year around seven in 10 (73.3%) flipped homes generated a gross profit.

It said a decline in flipping profitability has varied sharply by region, with the steepest falls concentrated in the South of England, where weaker house price growth and higher stamp duty costs have dented returns.

The North East of England, where house prices are lower, remains a “flipping hotspot” with locations such as Hartlepool, County Durham, Middlesbrough, Sunderland and Stockton-on-Tees being popular, the research found.

Stamp duty applies in England, and in Wales the land transaction tax applies.

Aneisha Beveridge, head of research at Hamptons, said: “Flipping is no longer the profitable venture it once was.

“There was a time when rundown properties could be bought cheaply, refurbished and resold at a healthy margin.”

Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.
Capital at risk.

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.
Capital at risk.

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

She said that stamp duty “is only part of the challenge”, adding: “Falling house prices across many southern markets have squeezed returns further while the cost of materials and labour have risen sharply since the pandemic.

“Even before factoring in stamp duty, refurbishment budgets now stretch much further than they once did, pushing profit margins to their thinnest levels in over a decade.

“In contrast, the North – particularly the North East – has remained far more resilient.

“Lower entry prices keep stamp duty bills modest, meaning more scope to add value through refurbishment. Combined with strong local house price growth, this has created a rare pocket of the country where flipping can still deliver healthy returns.

“Unless a flip is supported by strong underlying house price growth, turning a profit is becoming increasingly difficult. That said, investing in relatively cheaper property in an area where house price growth is strong can still yield solid returns.”

A cosy pub with a roaring fire. The smell of freshly baked scones floating from the local bakery. Almost no phone signal.

This is what awaits visitors to Ashwell, a Hertfordshire village less than an hour away from London.

Located at the source of the River Cam — which eventually flows into Cambridge — this idyllic spot has been named on a list of the 15 prettiest villages near London, compiled by Condé Nast Traveller.

The publication celebrated Ashwell for its brewery scene (which dates back to the 1800s), and added that its ‘streets offer a scenic interlude northbound off the A1.’

TimeOut also recently placed it first in their list of ‘unbelievably cute’ villages near to London, citing Ashwell Springs as the perfect spot for a ‘picturesque picnic’.

As a Hertfordshire native, I’m not surprised to see Ashwell on the list. It’s exactly how you’d picture a classic English village to be: children playing, cyclists buddying up for weekend rides, and neighbours chatting over fences.

So if you fancy a day trip this spring, here’s everything you need to know about the ‘green oasis’ around 40 miles from the capital.

WIN a relaxing countryside getaway for two

Need a bit of R&R? We’re giving you the chance to win a restorative break for two at Albion Aberteifi, a top-rated hotel in the beautiful coastal town of Cardigan, Wales.

Advertisement

The two-night stay includes Scandi-style breakfast, cocktails for two at the hotel bar, and a Nature Spa experience at nearby wellness retreat Fforest Farm, for two hours of basking in their individual cedar saunas and wood-fired hot tubs. Blissful.

For your chance to win this gorgeous spring getaway, enter your details into the form before midnight on Sunday, April 19. And don’t forget to sign up to The Getaway Expert, our seven-day guide to becoming a more confident traveller.

Click here to enter

Full T&Cs apply, see here.

Advertisement

Things to do in Ashwell

When the sun comes out, the aforementioned Ashwell Springs are the place to be. Near the high street, accessible by a footpath, you’ll find the small nature reserve, at the source of the River Cam.

Shallow enough for a paddle, take a picnic and read a book while the kids hop across the stepping stones. There’s even a sign that reads: ‘You are now entering a stress free zone’.

Advertisement

Once you’ve got your dose of vitamin D, The Three Tuns is everyone’s favourite pub. The spot serves up a huge roast on a Sunday, as well as classics like fish and chips and sausage and mash.

There are rooms available for an overnight stay, too. The Westminster Room, which sleeps four, is available to book for around £75 per night.

Other pubs include the The Rose and Crown, which, like much of the village, dates back to the 16th century.

Or, for more sunbathing, right opposite the 14th-century Church of St Mary the Virgin, you’ll find the Bushel and Strike, with its generously sized beer garden out the back, ideal for enjoying a pint of Hop & Heart, Foghorn, or the Genesis stout — all brewed in nearby Bedfordshire.

Speaking of beer, Ashwell has a long brewing history, due it’s abundant water supply, and fertile land. Fordham’s Brewery produced ales and stouts in the village for more 100 years. You can learn all about their history, as well as other fun facts, at the Ashwell Museum, which is free to enter, and open all year.

Advertisement

Housed in a medieval timber-framed building, the museum described Ashwell as ‘a world in a village’.

Wandering around the quaint streets, you’ll find everything you’d expect in a storybook village. Whether you’re looking for some sturdy sausages for a fry-up or a burger to stick on the barbecue, Crumps, a butcher and deli, has it all. As well as meats, there’s a counter full of cheese, plus plenty of fresh vegetables.

And, the jewel in Ashwell’s undeniable crown, Days Bakery is an essential visit. At Easter, there are fresh hot cross buns and cookies, and year-round, there’s bread, sandwiches, and sausage rolls galore.

It’s been there since 1741, which makes it one of the UK’s oldest bakeries. The original site is in Ashwell, but these days, there are also shops across the rest of Hertfordshire, Cambridgeshire, and Essex.

And, if you’re going to be in Ashwell in August, don’t miss the annual Ashwell Show, held every August bank holiday. Running for more almost 100 years, there’s a craft market, fairground rides and a horse and dog show.

Advertisement

And apparently, this year’s ‘breathtaking main attraction’ is yet to be announced…

Getting to and around Ashwell

The nearest train station is Ashwell and Morden, which is only a five-minute drive away from the main village, but along a two-mile country road with no pavements.

There’s also the number 91 bus, which goes from door to door and takes about seven minutes.

Considering it’s deep in rural Hertfordshire, though, it’s worth checking the timetable so you’re not left high and dry.

Advertisement

When travelling from London, the train to London St Pancras takes about 45 minutes. It also passes through Finsbury Park on the way, for those after the Victoria line.

Cambridge, with its cobbled streets, university population, and sticky buns (from local legends Fitzbillies, no less), is also a 20-minute train ride away.

House prices in Ashwell

Fancy a more permanent move from the capital to the countryside?

According to data from Rightmove, the average house here has sold for £402,944 over the last year, which exceeds the going rate across the UK by a good £31,000.

Advertisement

That said, if you’re after a good alternative to the likes of Hitchin, where house prices level out at £491,314, then Ashwell is 20 minutes away, and that it cheaper.

Do you have a story to share?

Advertisement

Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.

MORE: The UK is getting a brand-new ‘garden town’ with 10,000 new homes

MORE: Londoners share how they really got on the property ladder

MORE: Golden eagles could return to England’s skies for first time in 150 years

Advertisement

Comments


Add as preferred source

The Getaway Expert

Your exclusive seven-day guide to travelling with confidence from Metro’s resident travel expert, Alice Murphy.

Advertisement

The Southport killer’s parents bear considerable blame for the deadly mass stabbing attack, which could and should have been prevented, a damning inquiry has found.

A bombshell report from the Southport Inquiry found a string of missed chances to halt violence-obsessed teenager Axel Rudakubana before he unleashed his attack of “unparalleled cruelty” on a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop on 29 July 2024. The horrific stabbing claimed the lives of three children and left eight more girls and two adults wounded, sparking riots across the country.

Chairman Sir Adrian Fulford concluded that “this terrible event could have been – and should have been – prevented”. He said that “it is almost certain” that the tragedy would have been stopped if the killer’s family had shared the full extent of their concerns with authorities in late July 2024.

He also placed blame at the door of the multiple agencies that allowed Rudakubana to fall through the cracks, stating that the killer’s “trajectory towards grave violence was signposted repeatedly and unambiguously”.

The prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and Shabana Mahmood, home secretary, agreed the report exposed “systemic failures” and vowed to make changes to protect the public.

In the damning 763 page report, Sir Adrian found:

Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, were murdered when Rudakubana, then 17, entered The Hart Space, armed with a knife in summer 2024. He also attempted to murder eight other children, who cannot be named for legal reasons, class instructor Leanne Lucas, and businessman John Hayes. The 19-year-old, who was simply referred to as “the perpetrator” or “AR” in hearings out of respect to victims and their families, has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 52 years.

The inquiry, held over nine weeks at Liverpool Town Hall last year, heard from more than 100 witnesses, 67 who gave live evidence, about Rudakubana’s involvement with health services, social care and education, and the three referrals to anti-terror programme Prevent that were made, and closed, before he carried out the attack. Home secretary Yvette Cooper announced the inquiry in January 2025 after Rudakubana’s contact with these various bodies emerged.

In a statement delivered at Liverpool Town Hall as the report was published, Sir Adrian said: “I have no doubt that if appropriate procedures had been in place and if sensible steps had been taken by the agencies and AR’s parents, this dreadful event would not have happened. It could have been and it should have been prevented.”

He continued: “AR’s trajectory towards grave violence was signposted repeatedly and unambiguously. Yet the systems and agencies responsible for safeguarding the public did not act with the cohesion, urgency or clarity required.”

Commenting on the parent’s handling of the teenager, who he described as an “aggressive, near total recluse”, he added: “If the full extent of AR’s family’s concerns had been shared with authorities in late July 2024 – including on the day of the attack – it is almost certain this tragedy would have been prevented.”

Sir Adrian acknowledged Rudakubana had placed his parents in an “extremely difficult position”.

“Their life at home must have become little short of a nightmare, given, to use the words of his own father, AR had turned into a monster,” the chairman said.

However he found the couple, Alphonse Rudakubana and Laetitia Muzayire, had “created significant obstructions” to engagement with him by various agencies and failed to stand up to his behaviour and set boundaries, as well as failing to report a clear escalation in his risk.

He said: “If AR’s parents had done what they morally ought to have done, AR would not have been at liberty to conduct the attack and it would not therefore have occurred.”

But, he said it should have been “obvious” to those in a position to act that Rudakubana was not being “effectively parented”.

Both Rudakubana’s parents, who moved to the UK from Rwanda, gave evidence to the inquiry from remote locations.

His mother told the hearing: “There are many things that Alphonse and I wish we had done differently, anything that might have prevented the horrific event of July 29 2024. (For) our failure, we are profoundly sorry.”

Sir Adrian said Rudakubana had “clearly revealed the extreme danger that he presented to others” more than four years before his attack, when he went his former school, the Range High School in Formby, armed with a kitchen knife and a hockey stick and attacked a student.

The inquiry chairman said the incident in December 2019, for which the teenager received a 10-month referral order, was a “watershed event” and should have led agencies to conclude he posed a “high risk of harm to others”.

The inquiry heard between 2019 and 2024, Rudakubana was referred to anti-terror programme Prevent three times, but the referrals were closed. He purchased a number of weapons, including three machetes, online as well as ingredients he used to make the poison ricin.

Sir Adrian said as time passed, interaction between Rudakubana and organisations became “at best, something of a token”.

The chairman recommended the second phase of the inquiry should consider appointing a single agency to monitor interventions for children presenting a high risk of serious harm. He also said it should consider abilities to restrict or monitor their access to the internet.

The families of the survivors warned “this must not happen again” as they called for urgent steps to address 67 recommendations made in the report.

Nicola Ryan-Donnelly, of law firm Fletchers, represents the families of 22 of the wounded children.

“The physical and emotional scars inflicted on them are a daily reminder of something that we now know could and should have been prevented,” she said.

“They have bravely shared their stories with this inquiry, reliving the horror of that day, in the hope that things can be done, change can happen and that no other family will have to suffer as they have.

“We ask that where recommendations have been made, those individuals and agencies to which they are addressed, take action now. Not tomorrow. This must not happen again.”

Nicola Brook, solicitor at Broudie Jackson Canter, representing the three adult survivors, said her clients were heroes who have suffered a “deluge of unjustified criticism on social media”, which she called to end.

“The report crystallises one of our key concerns throughout – that every organisation tried to shirk responsibility, and that there was a disturbing lack of leadership,” she added. “This is not the first time we have heard this at an inquiry.

“It is evident, time and time again, that there is a culture within government agencies to place their own reputations above their fundamental duty to protect society, and a failure to properly reflect on their conduct once presented with clear evidence that they failed on multiple occasions.”

Prime minister Keir Starmer described the findings as “truly harrowing and profoundly disturbing” as he described the murders as “one of the darkest moments in our country’s history”.

Responding to the report, he added. “It sets out in stark detail the systemic failures over the five years that led to this terrible event, and the repeated missed opportunities that could have prevented it.

“While nothing will ever bring three little girls back, erase the trauma from those injured, or undo the lasting impact on those who witnessed such horror, I am determined to make the fundamental changes needed to keep the public safe.”

Home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, added: “Sir Adrian’s report is heartbreaking. It shows a systematic failure of the state to prevent a vile and sickening individual perpetrating this atrocity.”

Sir Adrian, who described the attack as “one of the most egregious crimes” in UK history when he opened the hearings, said the obligation was to provide answers to victims and their families.

Widespread rioting and civil unrest that erupted across the country following the murders has not been examined.

A second phase of the inquiry will be informed by the findings of phase one and is expected to focus on the risk posed by young people with a fixation, or obsession with, acts of extreme violence.

Mark Wynn, chief executive of Lancashire County Council, issued an apology and promised to implement the report’s recommendations in full.

“We are deeply sorry for the failures identified and for the part we played in the systemic shortcomings that preceded the attack in Southport,” he added.

“We know that no words can ease the grief of the families who lost loved ones, or the pain of those who were injured and traumatised.

“Since 2019, we have made substantial changes to our safeguarding practice, and the chair’s findings will inform our continued improvement. We are committed to implementing all recommendations directed to us in full.”

Chief Constable Rob Carden, of Merseyside Police, said the force welcomes and acknowledges the findings. He paid tribute to families of Elsie, Bebe and Alice, adding: “It is incumbent on all the organisations referred to by the inquiry to act on the recommendations made to ensure everything possible is done to prevent this from happening again.”

More follows on this breaking news story…

The Charity Commission is understood to be working with the Sentebale organisation to understand how suing Prince Harry for defamation would “further their charity’s purposes”

The charity Prince Harry co-founded in honour of his late mother, Princess Diana, is facing scrutiny from the charity regulator over plans to sue him for defamation.

The Charity Commission has been working with the trustees of Sentebale after being made aware of the legal action in February, and said it is seeking to understand how the action would “further their charity’s purposes”.

Harry is being sued for defamation by the charity over allegations he co-ordinated an “adverse media campaign” which caused “operational disruption and reputational harm”, its board of trustees has claimed.

Online court filings show that the duke is a defendant in a libel or slander claim alongside Mark Dyer, a former trustee. On Friday evening, Harry responded to the allegations in a statement issued by a spokesperson on his behalf saying he and Mr Dyer saying they “categorically reject these offensive and damaging claims”.

READ MORE: Prince Harry sued for defamation by Sentebale charity he co-foundedREAD MORE: Harry and Meghan ‘could consider UK return if Australia tour successful’, claims insider

A Charity Commission spokesperson said: “We are aware of the charity’s plans to take legal action and have been engaging with the trustees to understand how this action furthers their charity’s purposes.” Last year, Harry and co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho stepped down as patrons of Sentebale in support of a group of trustees, who resigned following a bitter boardroom battle with charity chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka.

The Duke of Sussex co-founded Sentabale in 2006 to help support young people living with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho and Botswana. Sentebale says no charitable funds are being used to fund the legal action, which is being “met entirely by external funding”. It is not clear where the external funding is coming from.

A source close to Harry said: “Whether they’re using external or internal funds for the case, that money could still be used to support the charity’s work.” While Sentebale: “This matter is subject to active legal proceedings. It would therefore be inappropriate to comment on any aspect.”

The Charity Commission says “legal action can present a significant risk to a charity’s beneficiaries, assets and reputation”. Legal director and charity lawyer at Shoosmiths told The Times that taking legal action was a significant step, and Sentebale would need to convince the Charity Commission there were “no other reasonable options”.

He explained: “The charity is really going to have to answer the question: how is that going to be advancing the charity’s objects and purposes? It looks high stakes … It seems a sort of matter where there are going to be no winners.”

Sentebale, which means forget-me-not, was thrown into crisis last March, when Harry and Prince Seeiso appeared to suddenly step down as patrons. It came after the charity’s trustees sought to introduce a new fundraising strategy, with the dispute arising between Dr Chandauka and some of the trustees and Harry.

A war of words followed the resignations with Harry and Seeiso issuing a joint statement in March 2025, describing their decision as “unthinkable”, adding the trustees “acted in the best interest of the charity in asking the chair to step down” while “in turn, she sued the charity to remain in this voluntary position, further underscoring the broken relationship”.

Dr Chandauka hit back in a television interview, accusing the duke of being “involved” in a “cover-up” of an investigation about bullying, harassment and misogyny at the organisation and said the “toxicity” of his brand had impacted the charity, which she claimed had seen a drop in donors since Harry moved to the US.

Later, it was claimed Harry sent an ‘unpleasant text’ to Dr Chandauka after she failed to publicly quash rumours of a rift with his wife, Meghan. The charity chair claimed that after an awkward moment between her and Meghan was captured on camera at a polo match to raise funds for Sentebale in Florida in 2024, she was asked to issue a statement by Harry’s team defending the duchess.

She said she refused the request, saying: “We cannot become an extension of the Sussex machine”. It was then reported that Harry sent her a direct message asking her to “explain herself”, using “imperious” language and leaving the charity chair “taken aback”. The Duke’s team has not responded to this claim

A probe by the Charity Commission followed after Dr Chanduaka reported the prince and the trustees to the regulator over alleged bullying and harassment.

Its report criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a “missed opportunity” to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement, which risked undermining public trust in charities generally.

The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity, but acknowledged “the strong perception of ill treatment” felt by some involved. A source at the time said that Harry had been left emotionally devastated by the events after 19 years of working with the charity.

The Honda CB500 motorcycle crashed with a grey VW Polo at the junction between the A167 Darlington Road and the B1263 in Northallerton around 6.30pm on Thursday, April 9.

The bike was travelling north west along the A167 and the car was turning right onto the A-road.

Both the motorcycle rider and their pillion passenger sustained significant, life-threatening injuries and remain in hospital.

Both occupants of the VW Polo also sustained significant injuries and were taken to hospital for treatment. One remains in hospital at this time.

The road was closed for several hours while collision investigation work and vehicle recovery took place.

North Yorkshire Police are now appealing for witnesses or anyone with dashcam footage from the area around the time of the collision, and in the moments leading up to it, to come forward.

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said: “If anyone witnessed the collision, or has any dashcam footage from that area around the time of the collision, and leading up to it, please get in touch.”

Anyone who can help is asked to email MCIT@northyorkshire.police.uk or call North Yorkshire Police on 101, quoting reference number 12260063501.