Call to bring butchers back to Shambles divides York

YORK readers have been split down the middle after a letter called for traditional butcher’s shops to return to Shambles – the city’s most famous historic street, now synonymous with Harry Potter-inspired stores, ghost merchandise and wizarding window displays.

While some mourn the loss of food traders and everyday shops for locals, others argue that nostalgia alone cannot reverse economic reality – and that the street’s modern success should be celebrated, not dismantled.

One reader recalled a time when specialist food shops still had a foothold on the Shambles. “Dewhurst’s was still there until about twenty years back,” wrote one commenter. “They couldn’t compete with supermarket butchers. More is the shame.”

Others were far less sentimental. One bluntly dismissed the idea altogether, arguing that “people are eating less meat and go to supermarkets”, suggesting the call to bring back butchers was out of touch with how people shop today.

But for many, the issue runs far deeper than sausages and steaks.

Subscriber John Henderson launched a stinging attack on what he described as the hollowing out of York city centre, blaming decision‑makers for prioritising tourism over residents.

“Yes, we need quirky commercially proven shops,” he wrote, “but this is still York city centre and should be there to provide for the people of York.” He argued that traditional businesses such as butchers and bakeries have been “priced out”, replaced by student accommodation, hotels and novelty shops aimed squarely at visitors.

Several readers agreed that locals are being sidelined – but disagreed on who is to blame.

Shambles in York. Image: Dylan Connell

One pointed out that no single body decides what opens on Shambles. “The market chooses,” they said, adding that once planning consent is in place, it comes down to who can afford the rent.

Another commenter was more scathing about calls for a return to the past. “You want old‑fashioned butchers and bakeries? Get off your backside and open them,” they wrote – a sentiment repeated more than once.

Others argued that Shambles’ transformation should be seen as a success story. One reader said the street had been losing its traditional identity decades ago, long before wizard shops arrived, citing poor parking and “soulless out‑of‑town shopping” as the real culprits.

Read more:

“We shouldn’t dismiss the modern recreation of the Shambles,” they wrote. “It is now highly successful and those that have brought this about deserve much praise.” In contrast, they criticised City of York Council for wider decline elsewhere in the city centre.

The debate also reignited strong feelings about the so‑called Harry Potter shops themselves. One reader defended the original wizard‑themed store, describing it as a clever and legally savvy idea that became an instant hit when it opened in 2017.

Under a free‑market system, they argued, the shop has every right to be there.

“This isn’t a political issue,” the commenter added. “It’s pure economics.”

Others injected a dose of historical reality into the discussion, questioning whether people really want Shambles to return to its original form. One asked whether today’s shoppers would tolerate carcasses hanging outside shopfronts, or animals being slaughtered on site – practices that were once commonplace on the medieval street.

Several readers also noted that traditional food traders haven’t disappeared entirely. “There is a perfectly good butcher stall… in Newgate Market within 50 yards of the Shambles,” one pointed out.

In the end, the comments reveal a city wrestling with a familiar question: should York’s most famous street serve daily life for locals, or capitalise on the tourism that keeps it thriving?

For now, Shambles remains what the market has made it – and York’s readers remain anything but united on whether that should change.

What do you think?

Feel strongly about an issue? Write us a letter. Please write no more than 250 words and you must provide your full name, address and mobile number. Send your views by email to: letters@thepress.co.uk

Write a comment

Join the debate and leave a comment in our comments section below this article – we may use your comments for a follow up article.