This Is Not A Murder Mystery centres on a circle of young Surrealist artists during the 1930s.
The Belgian English-language crime drama has arrived on Channel 4, having originally broadcast last year.
Set amongst the grandeur of an English country estate, the series finds a gathering of celebrated artists ensnared alongside a serial killer.
The production stars Pierre Gervais as Rene Magritte, Inaki Mur as Salvador Dali, Florence Hall as Lee Miller, Frank Rourke as Man Ray and Mike Hoffman as Max Ernst, reports the Mirror.
Advertisement
The official synopsis for This Is Not A Murder Mystery, drawn from Magritte’s The Treachery of Images painting, states: “Crime drama set in the flamboyant 1930s, following a group of young Surrealist artists, including Dali and Magritte, who are trapped in a lavish mansion with a serial killer on the loose.”
Viewers were left gripped by the unique period drama, with one person writing: “This series is a delightful and stylish twist on the classic whodunit. Set in the opulent 1930s with a gathering of legendary surrealist artists, it plays masterfully with suspense and visual flair.” They added: “For anyone looking for an intelligent drama wrapped in atmosphere and intrigue, this series is a must-watch.”
Another person branded it “worth watching” while someone else called it “charming”. When the trailer dropped, fans rushed to share their excitement, with one writing: “This looks *rilly* good, as another said: “This looks fun!”
Advertisement
Someone else said: “I’m so glad Agatha Christie-ish stories has taken ahold of media for now. It’s such a fun genre.”
Another added: “I’ve been itching for another story like this ever since Knives Out came out years ago! And I’m also really excited to see a cast where I don’t recognize anyone I’m sick of Hollywood only casting the same “trendy” actors in roles they’re ill-suited for so this is a nice chance to see other talent shine!”
Producer Kristoffel Mertens and Elly Vervloet previously spoke to Variety about turning their surrealist idea into this drama, with Mertens saying: “It started as the typical cliché idea that goes around in production companies.
Advertisement
“Everyone is very enthusiastic about it, but at the same time we would never be able to make it. Yet for this one, it remained with us and we kept going back to it, so in the end, we thought we could try to at least get it into development. And it turns out that “This is Not a Murder Mystery’ became one of the biggest shows ever made in Flanders.”
It’s definitely the biggest series we have ever done”, Vervloet added.
“We usually commission Flemish series for our local audience, creating a mix of domestic series and high-end TV shows as well.
“But at that level, it becomes a matter of dreaming big, being bold, and daring to make this choice as a public broadcaster to bring this English-spoken series to our audience and beyond.”
Advertisement
This Is Not A Murder Mystery is available to watch on Channel 4
The Trump administration has called on TV network ABC to “take a stand” after a joke from its late night comedy host Jimmy Kimmel offended the US president and first lady.
Two days before the White House Correpondents’ dinner on April 25, Kimmel broadcast what he said was a “roast” of the Trump administration. Roasts are typically quite savage comedic attacks which have become a traditional part of the dinner.
Trump, who was famously the target of jokes from former president, Barack Obama, at a dinner in 2011, had never attended the dinner while in office. This year he opted to attend, but the comedian’s spot was taken by what was described as a “mentalist”.
So Kimmel said he decided to supply the roast on his show as an “all-American” version of the Correspondents’ Dinner. In what he said was a joke about the 24-year age difference between the couple, he described Melania Trump as “having a glow like an expectant widow”. But after a would-be assassin tried to launch a murderous attack two days later at the dinner, the Trumps have demanded his sacking.
Advertisement
“Enough is enough. It is time for ABC to take a stand. How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behaviour at the expense of our community,” Melania Trump wrote in a post on X.
But it appears that ABC, a subsidiary of Disney, is instead standing by Kimmel, who has not been taken off air, in contrast to an episode in September 2025 when Kimmel was suspended after comments he made following the death of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, a close friend of the Trumps. After a public outcry, ABC relented and restored Kimmel’s show.
In response, Brendan Carr, the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has brought forward a review of ABC’s station licences, which were previously not scheduled until 2028 or later. Carr’s actions follow a press conference at the White House on April 26 at which press secretary Karoline Leavitt said coverage critical of Trump, including from his Democrat opponents, was responsible for the rise in political violence in the US by creating what she called a “leftwing cult of hatred”.
These examples highlight the politicisation of “free speech” by the Trump administration as a cudgel to silence disfavoured viewpoints under the guise protecting the public from harm.
Advertisement
First amendment protection for free speech
But these political debates are becoming increasingly distanced from the first amendment. That is, the interpretation of the first amendment by the Supreme Court and the protections it provides to individuals and entities, including media outlets and broadcast companies, from government interference. The wider this gulf becomes, the greater the space between the principles underlying the expansive protections afforded to speech in the US and the public’s understanding of the democratic principles that underpin these protections.
Jimmy Kimmel defends his joke about the Trumps.
This is more important than ever in the Trump era. Actions taken by the administration to target broadcast networks and individuals for political speech are precisely what the first amendment protects against. It was designed, among other things, to protect individuals, entities and the press from government interference by creating an open marketplace in which ideas compete freely.
This is particularly true for dissenting political speech, which is the core of the first amendment. This explains why government interference with speech based on “the specific motivating ideology or the opinion or perspective of the speaker” – known as “viewpoint discrimination” – is expressly prohibited.
Advertisement
Additionally, whether and to what extent speech is offensive is irrelevant to the protection it enjoys. When it comes to the value of public debate, the first amendment is not neutral. Indeed, as a Supreme Court judgment, Baumgartner v. United States (1944) found: “One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures.” Moreover a more recent judgment, Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell (1988), found that “robust political debate” is expressly encouraged, given that such debate “is bound to produce speech that is critical of those who hold public office”.
Importantly, the Supreme Court found in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) that such criticism, inevitably, will not always be reasoned or moderate and that public figures as well as public officials will be subjected to “vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks”.
The motive of the speaker is also irrelevant, as the Supreme Court held in Hustler v Falwell that while a “bad motive” may be deemed controlling for tort liability and in other areas of the law, “the first amendment prohibits such a result in the area of public debate about public figures”.
Advertisement
Stakes couldn’t be higher
By expressly linking Democrat criticisms of the president, and pointed critiques (however off-colour) from Kimmel and his fellow political satirists to an upsurge in political violence, the Trump administration is trying to silence criticism of its actions. But it’s also clear that this behaviour is precisely what the first amendment prohibits.
Ironically, the media often portrays these episodes as “feuds” between Trump and his critics.
But when viewed through the lens of the first amendment and its core values in this context, the stakes are much higher. These episodes constitute an effort to wrest control of public discourse by interfering in the marketplace of ideas in order silence those critical of the government.
And history tells us that a government that can silence its critics often does so in pursuit of unchecked power. Viewed through this lens, perhaps the greatest threat to American democracy is the government itself.
“As the threat level rises, I urge everyone to be vigilant, as they go about their daily lives, and report any concerns they have to the police. And I can assure everyone that our world-class security services and the police are working, day and night, to keep our country safe.”
Stephen Law and Anthony Lee Dickons were trapped inside their car by a gang of armed men who allegedly carried out a brutal attack before fleeing when they heard police sirens.
He told a trial at Teesside Crown Court he wanted nothing to do with the violence but accepted that he stayed at the scene while Anthony Dickons and Stephen Hall were attacked.
Advertisement
Mr Dickons died several days later from his injuries, having been slashed with a machete.
A jury heard how the four – Daniel Simpson, Domonic Hall, Morgan Caldwell and a 17-year-old who cannot be named for legal reasons – who all deny murder, were driving around in a black Chevrolet containing machetes and a BB gun.
Mr Dickons was attacked in the passenger seat of his car moments after it had been rammed when the gang were hunting for his friend Mr Law after a drug deal went wrong, the court was told.
Jurors watched CCTV of four people jump out of their 4×4 and launch the brutal attack on Mr Dickons and his friend Stephen Law.
Advertisement
James Bourne-Arton KC, representing Simpson, took his client through what happened in the moments after the Chevrolet was rammed into the VW Passat and the violence erupted.
He said he wasn’t expecting there to be violence and was shocked about what happened.
The barrister asked: “What was going on at that point?”
Simpson replied: “I wanted no part of it. I came to the back of the car.”
Advertisement
He asked: “What could you see?” Simpson replied: “I saw Anthony Dickons laid on the back seat.”
When asked what happened next, he replied: “I saw Morgan Caldwell trying to hit the window in. I just saw what was going on and I didn’t want to be involved in it.”
Earlier in the trial, jurors heard Mr Dickons suffered a 15cm wound to his thigh and another 8cm wound to his buttock as he was repeatedly struck with a machete when he was trapped inside his car.
The 44-year-old died nine days later after suffering brain damage after his heart stopped beating.
Advertisement
Simpson, of Coledale Road in Berwick Hills, 24-year-old Domonic Hall of Greencroft Walk, 26-year-old Caldwell of Cannock Road, and the teenager, all of Middlesbrough, also deny a charge of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm against Stephen Law.
This ITV crime drama on Netflix has been labelled as “impossible to stop watching”.
Hayley Anderson Screen Time TV Reporter
18:31, 30 Apr 2026
Actress Helen McCrory dies aged 52
Peaky Blinders fans should check out this “compelling” drama from the mind behind Homeland.
Advertisement
While Netflix hosts numerous ITV dramas such as Broadchurch and Prey, one overlooked gem is the 2017 mini-series Fearless.
The series stars the late Helen McCrory, renowned for her portrayal of Polly Gray in Peaky Blinders, as seasoned human rights solicitor Emma Banville.
The dedicated solicitor makes a speciality of championing hopeless cases and puts her professional standing on the line while attempting to prove the innocence of a man imprisoned 14 years previously for the murder of a 14-year-old girl.
McCrory’s performance in Fearless has clearly resonated deeply with audiences.
Advertisement
“I cannot sing the praises of Helen McCrory enough. What a brilliant actress, so sad she is no longer with us”, one admirer commented.
Another viewer agreed: “The acting was amazing. Helen McCrory was ‘The Truth’ in Peaky Blinders and she for sure did her thing in Fearless. It is a much-watch series.”
Advertisement
Other fans praised the “superior thriller”, with one viewer sharing:
“A really tightly plotted thriller that is intelligent, never sags, keeps you on a knife edge and manages in the end to both satisfy and surprise.
“Brilliant writing. Great acting. Best UK thriller I’ve seen in years.”
A further comment read: “This series was impossible for me to stop watching…it grabbed me from episode one and I binge-watched the entire season”.
Fellow viewers labelled it “freaking awesome”, “compulsive” and “really gripping”.
Fearless not only showcases the late, great McCrory’s talents on screen, but also boasts remarkable expertise behind the camera, courtesy of creator Patrick Harbinson.
The acclaimed producer is renowned for his work on some of the world’s most celebrated television programmes, including Homeland, Law and Order: SVU, Person of Interest, 24 and Wire in the Blood.
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
If there’s one thing that makes us wonder why life has to be so complicated, it’s tech. That’s right: the literal thing designed to make our lives easier sometimes doesn’t do what we want it to. But we don’t need to tell you that.
If you’re anything like me, you’ll have multiple boxes attached to your TV: a gaming console, a live box, and a separate one for streaming. Not only does this clutter your living room, but it also makes things a million times more difficult than they need to be.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve thought ‘why can’t it all be in one place?’, or gotten frustrated that the app store on the box I’ve spent literal hundreds of pounds on doesn’t let me access an app I want to use.
Advertisement
So when I heard that Flixy had created a smart stick that lets you customise your TV without having to buy a completely new box or screen, I was relieved to say the least.
Unlike other TV boxes, Flixy doesn’t require you to pay for extra subscriptions or devices. Instead, it gives you total freedom over your TV setup by providing one plug-in portable HDMI device.
The Flixy stick can easily be inserted into your TV and, once it’s connected to WiFi, you can use the remote to personalise your home screen by selecting the streaming services, apps, channels, and games you want in one place.
Instead of having to find the right remote and switch between setups (not to mention how long it takes you to remember your password to each service), Flixy lets you access everything in one simple setup.
Advertisement
We mean everything: Flixy has access to over 1,000 channels and apps. Plus, it has 8GB of storage for apps, so you can add as many as you like, and it’ll automatically update to avoid feeling like your set up is completely outdated.
And, if you’re in the habit of double screening (who isn’t) Flixy even lets you browse the internet or screen mirror, to stop you from squinting at your phone.
Good news for the jetsetters out there, too: you can take Flixy with you anywhere you go, and simply plug it into any TV to get instant access to your favourite streaming services as long as you have WiFi.
Having gotten used to my finely-tuned set up, I wasn’t sure if I’d be able to adjust to a new interface. But luckily, Flixy offers a 30 day money-back guarantee, so you can try out its (many) features before making a final decision.
Advertisement
The biggest saving grace for me was that I followed the set up instructions to a T, which meant I didn’t have to do any jigs further down the line.
That meant a smoother entertainment experience, and finally having all my favourite platforms laid out in one place.
Considering Flixy is offering 75% off right now, there’s never been a better time to simplify your TV setup and maximise your time chillaxing. And you can’t tell me that’s not the meaning of life – I dare you.
President Donald Trump has reached into his favorite television network’s stable of personalities to be the nation’s top doctor after his first pick failed to clear Senate confirmation amid questions over her history of anti-vaccine activism.
In a Truth Social post, Trump said he is nominating Dr. Nicole Saphier, a radiologist who is director of breast imaging at Memorial Sloan Kettering in New Jersey, to be Surgeon General.
The president described Saphier as “a STAR physician who has spent her career guiding women facing breast cancer through their diagnosis and treatment while tirelessly advocating to increase early cancer detection and prevention, while at the same time working with men and women on all other forms of cancer diagnoses and treatments.”
He also praised the longtime television talking head as “an INCREDIBLE COMMUNICATOR, who makes complicated health issues more easily understood by all Americans.”
The head of the Metropolitan Police has hit out at Zack Polanski over his response to the Golders Green attack.
Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley condemned “observers with little experience of policing in the real world” for criticising the actions of his officers.
Shilome Rand, 34, and Moshe Shine, 76, were left seriously injured in what police have described as a terrorist incident in Golders Green, north west London, on Wednesday.
A video of the incident posted on social media shows Metropolitan Police apprehending the man suspected of carrying out the attacks.
Advertisement
Green Party leader Polanski retweeted a post on X which said: “So essentially [Met commissioner Mark Rowley’s] officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was already incapacitated by taser.”
In a letter to Polanski, Sir Mark said he was “disappointed” that he had amplified the comments of an “armchair critic” of the police’s actions.
He said: “Those officers are nothing short of extraordinary. They were on the scene within a few minutes and their actions undoubtedly prevented further injury and saved lives.”
The commissioner added: “Officers know they must be accountable for their use of force and there are processes for this to happen.
Advertisement
“Your use of your public profile to call their actions into question hours after a terrorist incident are not the appropriate route.”
A Green Party spokesman said: “Zack has seen the video like everyone else, and doesn’t know the full picture and knows it was a very difficult situation for the authorities, but we do need to understand more about the response.”
Watch as police officers confront a man suspected of carrying out a terrorist attack in north London where two men were stabbed.
The suspect refused to show his hands, was violent and continued to pose a clear threat. Using only their training, courage and tasers, they detained… pic.twitter.com/hQegUvqOZH
Green Party leader Polanski retweeted a post on X which said: “So essentially [Met commissioner Mark Rowley’s] officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was already incapacitated by taser.”
In a letter to Polanski, Sir Mark said he was “disappointed” that he had amplified the comments of an “armchair critic” of the police’s actions.
He said: “Those officers are nothing short of extraordinary. They were on the scene within a few minutes and their actions undoubtedly prevented further injury and saved lives.”
The commissioner added: “Officers know they must be accountable for their use of force and there are processes for this to happen.
Advertisement
“Your use of your public profile to call their actions into question hours after a terrorist incident are not the appropriate route.”
A Green Party spokesman said: “Zack has seen the video like everyone else, and doesn’t know the full picture and knows it was a very difficult situation for the authorities, but we do need to understand more about the response.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces a second day of grilling from Democrats on Capitol Hill, with senators getting their first opportunity Thursday to confront or praise the Pentagon chief over his handling of the Iran war.
Hegseth battled with Democrats — and some Republicans — a day earlier during a nearly six-hour House Armed Services Committee hearing, where he faced sharp questioning over the war’s costs in dollars, lives and the diminishing stockpiles of critical weapons.
The Senate Armed Services Committee will hear a similar presentation on the Trump administration’s 2027 military budget proposal, which would boost defense spending to a historic $1.5 trillion. Hegseth and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Dan Caine, will again stress the need for more drones, missile defense systems and warships.
Here’s the latest:
Advertisement
Defense secretary claims that 60-day legal limit for war is on pause during ceasefire
The Trump administration is running up against a 60-day limit for the Iran war that is instituted by the War Powers Act of 1973. The law requires that Congress must declare war or authorize the use of force, although it does provide for presidents to have a 30-day extension to draw down hostilities if it notifies Congress.
The 60-day limit for the Iran war will be reached Friday. However, Hegseth told senators, “We are in a cease fire right now, which our understanding means the 60-day clock pauses or stops in a ceasefire.”
Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine responded, “I do not believe the statute would support that,” and added that he had “serious constitutional concerns.”
Advertisement
Sen. Ernst lists accomplishments of ousted top Army uniformed officer
Saying she was “disappointed” to see Gen. Randy George’s retirement “hastened,” Republican Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa noted that the officer “pulled the Army out of its worst recruiting crisis since the Vietnam era” and trimmed “nonessential” Army positions.
George is one of several top military officers to be dismissed since Trump returned to office. In early April, the Pentagon said George would be “retiring from his position as the 41st Chief of Staff of the Army effective immediately.”
George had held the post of Army chief of staff, which typically runs for four years, since August 2023.
Advertisement
“He had 38 years of honorable service. He achieved the greatest Army recruitment and modernization effort in a generation,” Ernst said. “So I want to thank him for his service.”
Senators question whether the Pentagon has resources to prevent civilian casualties
Senators wanted to know what the Defense Department is doing to prevent deaths of civilians, especially after outdated intelligence contributed to the U.S. striking an elementary school in Iran and killing over 165 people.
Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand asked Hegseth, “What is your response to targeting that has resulted in the destruction of schools, hospitals, civilian places? Why did you cut by 90% the division that’s supposed to help you not target civilians?”
Advertisement
Hegseth responded that the Pentagon has an “ironclad commitment” to do more than other countries to prevent civilian deaths.
Still, Sen. Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican, continued Gillibrand’s line of questioning. He asked Hegseth whether the Pentagon still has the resources necessary to protect civilians.
Hegseth said it has “every resource necessary” and that humans are kept in the loop when AI is involved in military decisions.
Democratic senator grills defense officials on release of Ukraine funding
Advertisement
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, pushed Hegseth and other defense officials for details on how the Pentagon plans to use $400 million that Congress has allotted for Ukraine.
Hegseth told lawmakers a day earlier that the funding had been released. His actions came after Sen. Mitch McConnell, the former Senate Republican leader, penned an op-ed slamming the delay in releasing the funds.
But Shaheen pointed out that the Pentagon has not given Congress details on how it plans to spend the money. Hegseth told her that it would also be used as part of a program to sell military equipment first to NATO allies.
Shaheen shot back that it “was not the intent of Congress in providing that $400 million.”
Advertisement
The Defense Department’s current budget request includes no funding for Ukraine.
Top defense official confirms Russian involvement in Iran war
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Dan Caine, told senators Russian President Vladimir Putin has aided Iran’s war effort.
He declined to go into details, citing the public nature of the hearing, but said, ”There’s definitely some action there.”
Advertisement
The chair of the committee, Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, agreed, saying “there’s no question that Vladimir Putin’s Russia is taking serious action to undermine our efforts for success in Iran.”
Hegseth again has harsh words for critics
“As I said yesterday, and I’ll say it again today, the biggest adversary we face at this point are the reckless naysayers and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans,” Hegseth said in his opening statement to the Senate panel.
Defending Trump’s budget request, Hegseth said the president “inherited a defense industrial base that had been hollowed out by years of America last policies, resulting in a diminished capacity to project strength.”
Advertisement
Similar to his Wednesday remarks to a House committee, Gen. Dan Caine said it was his duty as Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman “to ensure our civilian leadership has a comprehensive range of military options and the associated risks required to make the nation’s hardest and most complex decisions.”
Man accused of trying to kill Trump at correspondents’ gala agrees to remain jailed for now
Cole Thomas Allen did not enter a plea during his brief appearance Thursday before U.S. Magistrate Moxila Upadhyaya.
Prosecutors allege Allen planned his attack for weeks and tracked Trump’s movements online before he ran through a magnetometer at the Washington Hilton on Saturday night while holding a long gun and disrupted one of the highest-profile annual events in the nation’s capital.
Advertisement
Allen was injured during the attack but wasn’t shot. A Secret Service officer was shot but was wearing a bullet-resistant vest and survived, officials say. Prosecutors have said they believe Allen fired his shotgun at least once and that a Secret Service agent fired five shots. They have not publicly confirmed that it was Allen’s bullet that struck the agent’s vest.
▶ Read more
Chinese foreign minister speaks with Rubio ahead of Trump’s planned China trip
Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Thursday spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and called leader-level diplomacy the “guiding star” of the China-U.S. relations, the Chinese foreign ministry said.
Advertisement
The call came just about two weeks before President Trump plans to travel to China for the first time since 2017 and hold talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
Wang credited the “strategic leadership” by Xi and Trump for the overall stability in China-U.S. relations and said both sides should cherish it and well prepare for “high-level interactions.”
Wang urged the U.S. side to make the “right choice” over the Taiwan issue, which he said is the most risky in China-U.S. relations. Beijing considers the self-governed island part of Chinese territory and vows to seize it by force if necessary, while Washington opposes use of force in the Taiwan Strait.
Anti-war protester disrupts Hegseth hearing
Advertisement
A protester in a pink shirt disrupted Hegseth’s opening statement before the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The man stood, unfurled a hand-written sign and yelled, “Pete Hegseth, you’re a war criminal.”
Within seconds, he was removed by Capitol Police officers. Several other people dressed in similar pink shirts have also left the hearing room.
The committee chair, Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, continued the hearing by saying he respected First Amendment rights to free speech, but that anyone who disrupts the hearing would be removed.
Advertisement
Top Democrat on military panel gives sweeping critique of Hegseth’s leadership
Sen. Jack Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, did not hold back in his opening statement directed toward Hegseth.
From the war with Iran to Hegseth’s efforts to remake military culture, Reed dressed down the defense secretary’s actions and warned they could do long-term harm.
Reed argued that the war with Iran has left the U.S. in a worse strategic position than when it was started because the Strait of Hormuz is closed and 13 U.S. military members have been killed. Many others have been injured, and equipment has been destroyed.
Advertisement
“The American people’s trust in our military took 250 years to build. You are dismantling it in a fraction of that time,” Reed concluded.
Panel chairman decries ‘axis of aggressors’ in Hegseth Senate hearing
In opening remarks, GOP Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi outlined threats to the United States he said were a “growing alliance” of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, saying the current moment represents “the most dangerous security environment since World War II.”
Saying Chinese President Xi Jinping led a “growing alliance” among the countries, Wicker said they shared a goal ”to oppose America’s interests and the interests of other like minded, democratic countries across the globe.”
Advertisement
“Ties have never been closer among these four dictators,” Wicker said. “Among these four dictatorships, they support each other’s aggressive endeavors.”
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he’ll sign redistricting bill when he gets it
The Republican Florida governor told reporters Thursday he would not delay signing the new congressional map the GOP-dominated Legislature passed Wednesday at his and President Trump’s urging.
There had been some speculation that DeSantis could hold the bill for as long as possible — as much as two weeks or so depending on when the Legislature adjourns — to delay when the bill’s critics can file lawsuits challenging the measure.
Advertisement
The new map is intended to help Republicans gain as many as four more U.S. House seats in November, making the GOP advantage in Florida up to 24-4.
DeSantis said Wednesday’s U.S. Supreme Court decision curtailing the strength of nonwhite voters in redistricting vindicated his decision to call a special session for what he insists is a “race neutral” map.
Hegseth’s Senate hearing is starting
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is sitting before senators in what’s expected to be another fiery hearing on the Hill.
Advertisement
The defense secretary’s hearing is ostensibly to discuss the Pentagon’s $1.5 trillion budget request to Congress, but it’s the first time that senators will get to publicly question him since the Iran War began nearly two months ago. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Dan Caine, is also seated beside Hegseth.
The defense secretary also appeared for a House hearing Wednesday and he drew a large crowd of anti-war protesters to the hallways of the House office building where the hearing was held.
On Thursday, things feel a bit more low-key in the Senate, although there are a handful of people in the hearing room wearing pink shirts that state “Peace with Iran.”
Top Chinese and US trade officials speak ahead of planned state visit
Advertisement
Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng on Thursday spoke by video with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, China’s state media reported, ahead of a planned state visit by President Trump to Beijing in mid-May.
The two sides had a “candid, in-depth and constructive” exchange, the state broadcaster China Central Television said. The Chinese side lodged “solemn concerns” over recent restrictive trade measures imposed by the U.S. on China, but the statement didn’t specify the measures.
Last week, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned a China-based oil refinery and 40 shippers involved in transporting Iranian oil. The U.S. Trade Representative Office this week held a hearing on the use of forced labor in foreign goods.
Trump takes another dig at German leader
Advertisement
The president is continuing to pillory German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who’s been increasingly critical of the U.S.-Israel war against Iran.
Trump in a social media post said Merz “should spend more time on ending the war with Russia/Ukraine” and “fixing his broken Country, especially Immigration and Energy” and less time concerning himself with the Iran war.
The latest criticism by Trump of Merz came the day after the U.S. president announced he was reviewing the U.S. military presence in Germany, a NATO ally that hosts several American military installations.
Trump administration appeals order blocking government from cutting vaccine recommendations
Advertisement
U.S. officials are appealing a judge’s order that blocks the government from cutting the number of vaccines recommended for every U.S. child.
Government lawyers on Wednesday filed the one-sentence appeal.
It was a delayed response to a March 16 order by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, who blocked an order by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. — announced in January — to end broad recommendations for all children to be vaccinated against flu, rotavirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, some forms of meningitis and RSV.
Murphy’s order also stopped a meeting of a Kennedy-appointed vaccine advisory committee. The stay continues while the appeal is considered.
Advertisement
White House is facing a War Powers Resolution deadline
The Trump administration is constrained by the 1973 law, which requires several notification and approval steps meant to keep a commander-in-chief’s military powers in check.
One of its provisions is that military action authorized by the president must end after 60 days unless Congress has explicitly approved it, or has declared war. That 60-day clock runs out Friday.
One White House official said the administration is in “active conversations” with lawmakers on addressing the deadline, but did not elaborate. The official was granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The administration can request a 30-day extension by telling Congress in writing that there’s a continued need for military action. The White House, which has long stressed that the president is working toward a diplomatic option in Iran, hasn’t indicated publicly whether Trump will seek that extension.
Advertisement
— Seung Min Kim
Trump floats a new plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
Under the plan, the United States would continue its blockade on Iranian ports, while coordinating with allies to impose higher costs on Iran’s attempts to subvert the free flow of energy, according to a senior administration official.
Trump is weighing multiple diplomatic and policy options to push Iran to end its chokehold on the waterway, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly.
Advertisement
— Aamer Madhani
US jobless aid filings fall to 189,000 last week despite multiple economic headwinds and Iran war
U.S. jobless aid applications for the week ending April 25 fell by 26,000 by to 189,000, down from the previous week’s 215,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That’s well below the 214,000 new applications analysts surveyed by the data firm FactSet were expecting.
Filings for unemployment benefits are considered a proxy for U.S. layoffs and are close to a real-time indicator of the health of the job market.
Advertisement
The four-week moving average of jobless claims, which evens out some of the weekly volatility, came in at 207,500, about 3,500 lower than the previous week.
The total number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits for the previous week ending April 18 fell to 1.79 million, a decrease of 23,000.
▶ Read more
US economy grew 2% from January-March, recovering from last fall’s federal shutdown
Advertisement
But the outlook is clouded by the Iran war.
The Commerce Department reported Thursday that gross domestic product — the nation’s output of goods and services — rebounded from a lackluster 0.5% expansion the last three months of 2025. The federal government’s spending and investment grew at a 9.3% annual rate in the first quarter, adding more than half a percentage point to growth after lopping off 1.16 percentage points in fourth-quarter 2025.
Growth in consumer spending, which accounts for 70% of U.S. economic activity, slowed to 1.6% in the first quarter from 1.9% at the end of 2025. But business investment, likely driven by investments in artificial intelligence, rose at an 8.7% pace.
Iran has blocked the Strait of Hormuz through which a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas passes. That has driven energy prices higher, fueling inflation and hurting consumers.
Advertisement
▶ Read more
A key inflation gauge jumps in March as Iran war-driven gas prices squeeze budgets
It’s the latest sign that the Iran war is pushing up the cost of living and delaying any interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve.
An inflation gauge monitored by the Fed rose 0.7% in March from February, up slightly from the previous month. Compared with a year ago, prices rose 3.5%, the biggest increase in almost three years.
Advertisement
Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core inflation rose 0.3% in March from February, and it was 3.2% higher than a year earlier. The annual figure is above February’s reading of 3%.
Rising gas prices have caused inflation to move further away from the Fed’s 2% target, which has caused the central bank to keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged after cutting it three times last year. The Fed typically keeps rates elevated — or even raises them — to combat higher inflation.
▶ Read more
New ‘bluster’ from Trump? Germany faces new threat about reduced US military presence in Europe
Advertisement
President Trump has again threatened that the United States could reduce its military presence in Germany, a key NATO ally and the European Union’s largest economy. Europeans have heard this before.
Trump’s social media post on Wednesday followed comments by Chancellor Friedrich Merz that the U.S. was being “ humiliated ” by Tehran as it slow-walks its diplomacy over the U.S.-Israel war against Iran.
Trump has mused for years about reducing America’s military presence in Germany, and has recently repeatedly railed against NATO for the its refusal to assist the U.S. in its two-month-old war.
U.S. allies at NATO have been waiting for the Trump administration to pull troops out since just after it came to office, warning that Europe would have to look after its own security, and that of Ukraine, in the future.
Advertisement
▶ Read more
Full federal appeals court won’t rehear $83 million defamation verdict against Trump
A divided federal appeals court said Wednesday it won’t grant a rare meeting of its active judges to hear an appeal of an $83 million verdict against President Donald Trump for defaming a magazine advice columnist over an encounter three decades ago.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to reject a so-called “en banc” hearing comes several months after Trump appealed to the Supreme Court another jury’s decision to grant $5 million the writer, E. Jean Carroll, after concluding he had sexually abused her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her. The high court hasn’t yet decided whether to hear the case.
Advertisement
Lawyers for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement that her client was “eager for this case, originally filed in 2019, to be over so that she can finally obtain justice.”
▶ Read more
Environmental Protection Agency boss backs big budget cuts but Congress will get the final say
Advertisement
Senate Democrats accused the Trump administration of abandoning the Environmental Protection Agency’s mission to protect human health and the environment at a congressional hearing Wednesday, slamming agency leadership over a proposal to cut its budget in half.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s appearance before the Senate environment committee was his last of three budget hearings this week where he argued for sharply reduced funding for the agency, which already has seen its staffing reduced to its lowest level in decades under his leadership. During much of the week, the former Republican congressman from New York took an aggressive approach, responding to Democrats in the House and Senate with his own questions and at times accusing them of being unprepared or failing to care about the EPA’s track record.
Zeldin has eliminated major climate change programs, promoted deregulatory efforts he calls the biggest in American history and canceled billions of dollars in Biden-era environmental justice grants to halt what he calls “EPA’s radical diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.”
▶ Read more
Advertisement
Brent crude surges over $120 a barrel on Iran war worries, while world stocks are mixed
The price of Brent crude oil briefly surged past $126 a barrel early Thursday as stalled U.S.-Iran talks raised doubts over the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and a permanent end to the Iran war.
Brent crude to be delivered in June jumped 3.3% to $121.90 after briefly soaring past $126 per barrel. Brent to be delivered in July rose 1.4% to $112.02.
Benchmark U.S. crude climbed 1.3% to $108.28 per barrel.
Advertisement
Before the war began in late February, Brent crude was trading around $70 per barrel.
There’s no clear path to an end to the war. The U.S. has continued its blockade of Iranian ports while the Strait of Hormuz is closed, pushing oil prices higher. Reports Thursday suggesting a possible escalation by Trump doused hopes for a quick end to the conflict.
Two soldiers “lost control” in the fatal shootings of five people in Belfast almost 54 years ago, a coroner has said.
The British Army soldiers did not use reasonable force in the shooting of a Catholic priest, a father-of-six and three teenagers in two areas of west Belfast on July 9 1972, the coroner ruled.
Mr Justice Scoffield said that Father Noel Fitzpatrick, 42, father-of-six Patrick Butler, 38, and teenagers David McCafferty and Margaret Gargan were unarmed and posed no risk when they were shot.
He said Father Fitzpatrick and Mr Butler were killed by the same bullet as the priest looked left and Mr Butler looked right as they attempted to cross the road from an alleyway.
Advertisement
David McCafferty, 15, was seeking to retrieve the body of the priest when he was shot in the back, the coroner said.
A soldier who fired the shots that killed all three, known only as Soldier A, was less than 100 metres away at Corry’s Timber Yard.
Advertisement
The coroner concluded that the soldier “fired prematurely”, “lost control” and shot without having first made an assessment of the risk, if any, they posed.
He said he was satisfied that no warning was given, and that the three victims were not carrying a weapon.
He said even if the soldier believed he needed to use force to defend himself, the force used was not reasonable.
A soldier known only as Soldier E, who was located at the same woodyard as Soldier A, shot Margaret Gargan, 13, in the head while she stood on a pavement and spoke to friends, the coroner said.
Advertisement
He was unable to conclude whether the other teenager, 16-year-old John Dougal, was armed when he was shot.
He said the teenager was a member of the junior wing of the Provisional IRA but said on balance he concluded he had not progressed into the ranks of the adult IRA. The coroner said even if John had been in possession of a firearm, he was not using it and was likely running away when he was shot in the back.
He said: “With John Dougal shot in the back as he ran from the area and taking into account the requirements of the yellow card, the force used by Soldier A was not reasonable.”
Advertisement
He said that Soldier A, who shot John Dougal, Fr Fitzpatrick, Mr Butler and David McCafferty, and Soldier E, who shot Margaret Gargan, had “overreacted and lost control”.
Mr Justice Scoffield rejected the British Army’s explanation that the soldiers were reacting to a mass “coordinated” attack on Corry’s Timber Yard, where the soldiers were based, and said the brigade radio logs “hugely undermine” that narrative.
He said he also rejected the civilian case that “not one shot had been fired” by civilians before British Army soldiers began firing and said that was “much too simplistic an analysis”.
He said that while soldiers may have been influenced by civilian firing, they were not responding to “a coordinated attack by a mass of gunmen”.
Advertisement
He said the soldiers based in the woodyard had been apprehensive about the breakdown of an IRA ceasefire and had been “expecting an armed attack and were, no doubt, nervous and fearful of such a possibility”.
Families and friends of the five gathered at Belfast Coroner’s Court for the long-awaited findings.
There was applause as they walked together holding a banner which read “time for truth”.
The group included former Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams, junior minister Aisling Reilly, West Belfast MP Conor Maskey and People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll.
The inquest concluded in April 2024, just hours before the former government’s guillotine on conflict-related court cases as part of new legacy laws coming into effect.
It was the last of the coronial investigations into Troubles-related deaths completed before the May 1 deadline of the Legacy Act, which is currently being reviewed under the Labour Government.
It had been a fresh inquest ordered by Northern Ireland’s attorney general in 2014 after an original inquest in 1973 returned an open verdict. Before reading out his findings, which number some 640 pages, Mr Justice Scoffield apologised to the families for the length of the wait, saying he had taken some time to consider matters.
During a trial in July 2024, he was convicted of rape, two counts of sexual assault, and voyeurism against four women while in January this year, he was found guilty of raping a woman in London in March 2015, and the attempted rape and sexual assault of another woman in Thailand in December 2019. He pleaded guilty to one count of voyeurism.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login