The triptych of dark paintings is complete. Bleak and desolate images stare out from each one. 

First, there is Peter Shilton in the Azteca Stadium in Mexico City at the 1986 World Cup, jumping to punch a looping ball that is flicked away from him by Diego Maradona‘s Hand of God.

Then, from the 1998 World Cup, there is David Beckham staring up at referee Kim Milton Nielsen after he has been worked over by Diego Simeone and has flicked out his foot at his opponent. There is dread and horror on Beckham’s face. He knows a red card is coming. He knows it will change everything.

And now, the last of the panels, drawn under the dome of the Atlanta Stadium on the 15th day of July, stands next to them. It features the face of Argentina’s cartoon villain, Enzo Fernandez, grinning up at the stands after breaking England hearts yet again.

There is a place for the clock on the giant screen, which showed that England were just five minutes away from their first World Cup final for 60 years when Fernandez scored the equaliser that denied them.

There is a place for Lautaro Martinez, whose late, late header won the game for England’s bitter enemy. There is a place for Lionel Messi, the greatest of all time. In his first game against England, it was he who provided the winner for Martinez. His record against England will forever read Played 1, Won 1.

And so it is Argentina who will march on New York on Sunday to meet Spain and try to win their second successive World Cup. 

Lautaro Martinez came off the bench to score a back-post header which won the game 2-1

Lionel Messi was magnificent in what was his first ever appearance up against England

For England, this is a time of shattered dreams. England always finds a way to lose these matches and now they have done it again. They are always the punchlines for someone else’s jokes.

Three defeats to Argentina and, to travel alongside them, three appearances in World Cup semi-finals in 60 years and now three defeats. Paul Gascoigne’s face reddened with crying after defeat to West Germany in Turin in 1990 and the devastation of Marcus Rashford after England lost to Croatia in their last four tie in Moscow in 2018.

England dwell on Desolation Row. This is a city that will be forever associated with a man who had a dream. England were hoping that they would march on New York after this match but their dream died here.

It turns out that the hope England harboured that Thomas Tuchel would be the coach who could finally drag them over the line in a major tournament was forlorn and misguided. 

England were regarded as favourites but, when it came to the moment of truth, Tuchel came up short. He was not the man to drag England over the line after all.

The truth is he saw the line and he shrank from it. 

A master tactician? Not on this evidence. When England scored, England simply sat back and ceded their opponents the momentum. Opponents who have Messi playing at number 10. That’s not a master tactician. That is either madness or rank stupidity.

He took England to the last four here, which is a creditable performance but Gareth Southgate took England to the last four in 2018 and the fans were throwing bottles at him by 2024, when he led England to the European Championship final. Tuchel was supposed to take England to the next level. It was beyond him.

It is always the same when England lose like this. It is as if a spell has been broken. The 3-2 victory over Mexico in the Azteca in the Round of 16, achieved with 10 men, at altitude, in front of a hostile crowd, in a magnificent stadium, against all odds, was the greatest football occasion I’ve ever been to. I will never forget England’s heroics that night but they were in vain.

The 2-1 comeback victory in the quarter-finals against Norway in the stifling heat of Miami was graced by one of the finest individual performances I have ever seen from an England player. Jude Bellingham scored both England goals and dragged them through to the semi-finals by the scruff of their necks. That, too, was in vain.

The atmosphere reached fever-pitch before kick-off. The Argentina fans swarmed over the stadium and filled up part of the end that seemed to be nominally reserved for England supporters. They leapt up and down relentlessly. 

‘And now you see, and now you see,’ they yelled in Spanish, ‘whoever doesn’t jump is English.’

They sang their song about the Falkland Islands, too, and the war of 1982 between the two countries. ‘For the Malvinas, for Diego, for Leo’s last one,’ they chanted. England fans go further back for their history. They sang about ’10 German bombers’. A few dressed as crusaders, chain mail and all.

Chelsea’s Enzo Fernandez soaked up all of the applause after scoring the equalising goal

Thomas Tuchel’s gameplan completely fell apart once Fernandez equalised with his stunner

Rarely have two national anthems been drowned out so comprehensively by booing but Tuchel and Argentina manager Lionel Scaloni shared a warm embrace before kick-off. Tuchel, once more, had not been afraid to make changes to his starting XI.

Every detail was heightened. Jude Bellingham and Morgan Rogers, old friends, wrapped each other in a last hug. Marc Guehi knelt on the pitch and prayed to his God. Messi stared up at the roof as he prepared to take the kick that started the game. Leandro Paredes’ first action was to shove Bellingham in the back and barge him to the floor off the ball.

Fernandez scythed down Elliot Anderson. Argentina, predictably, made it a priority, to try to provoke Bellingham. It was bedlam. It was unbelievably intense. No quarter given and none asked. Referee Ismail Elfath struggled to keep control. It was only when the hydration break came that anyone took a breath.

Quite how Fernandez and Giuliano Simeone avoided bookings is anyone’s guess. Although it did fit with Fifa’s favouritism towards them at this tournament. 

England showed they could mix it, too. Messi wriggled away from a series of challenges in midfield and then was cut down by a combination of Anderson and Spence. Spence was shown a yellow card. It was hard to believe but it was the first of the match. The lesson: foul Messi, get booked.

Seven minutes before half time, someone even tried a shot. Fernandez’s effort from range flew just too high. 

For most of the time, it felt less like a football match and more like watching a very angry man crammed into a washing machine with a man he hates and then putting the machine on spin. Then half-time arrived.

England had won a corner on the stroke of the interval but the referee refused to allow it to be taken and blew up for half-time. Which puzzled everyone. It fitted with a theme of the favourable treatment Argentina have been shown at this tournament.

England ignored it and 10 minutes after half time, they took the lead. Rogers found space on the right and curled a low cross to the back post. While Nahuel Molina hesitated, Anthony Gordon stole in front of him and clipped the ball deftly past Emiliano Martinez and into the corner of the net.

What a moment. Another was to follow swiftly, this time at the other end. Simeone, the son of Beckham’s tormentor of 1998, sprinted in on goal and, as he prepared to shoot, Spence slid in and executed a perfectly-timed tackle. England celebrated it almost as much as the goal.

England were dreaming of the final when Anthony Gordon scored the opening goal for 1-0

Djed Spence was excellent but he and his team-mates were crestfallen at the final whistle

Argentina have come back from behind many times already in this tournament and now they tried again. England sat back. Midway through the half, substitute Nico Gonzalez ran on to a cross from the right and met it full on but Pickford dived low to his right and pushed the header away superbly.

Fifteen minutes from time, England got a little luck, the luck that usually deserts them on these occasions. Rodrigo de Paul sent in a cross from the right and Alexis Mac Allister flung himself at it. His header cannoned off the post and out to safety. A few minutes later, Gonzalez headed agonisingly wide.

But then, five minutes from time, Argentina took a corner. They played it short to Messi. Messi drew three or four England defenders to him and then slipped a short pass to Fernandez. 

Fernandez took his time and then smashed a shot past Pickford from 25 yards. Bellingham had come rushing out to meet him but had not quite got there in time.

And then the final blow. Mac Allister hit the post with a low shot but it was picked up by Messi, of all people, on the right. Messi made space for a cross and crossed deep. Lautaro Martinez was there and he met it and powered it past Pickford with a thumping header from close range.

It was over. Over for another four years. And who knows how many after that. 

Outside, as they trudged into the early evening in America’s south, the faintest of breezes interrupted the humidity. All England’s hopes, so keenly felt, felt foolish and fragile now. All those hopes, gone with the wind.

Imagine an apartment that could be teleported across Europe. In Spain, its energy certificate might read D. In Germany, the same apartment could earn a C on a scale that runs to H. In Brussels, it might land on B, one of more than 15 subclasses. In the Netherlands, where the scale climbs to A+, it would look positively mediocre.

Same walls, same boiler, same physics, eight different letters.

This is not a thought experiment. It is how Europe has rated its buildings for two decades. Energy performance certificates or EPCs are used across most of Europe. Building energy ratings (BER) are issued in Ireland. In France, Diagnostic de Performance Énergétique (DPE) were introduced under EU law in 2002. Yet each country was left to design its own scale.

The result became known in building-policy circles as the Babel tower of EPCs: dozens of national ladders slicing the same quantity – kilowatt-hours per square metre per year – into incompatible alphabets. Denmark even labels its best homes by vintage, with classes indicating year of construction called A2020, A2015 and A2010.

The demolition order

That tower is now being dismantled. The recast energy performance of buildings directive, in force since May 2024, requires all 27 member states to rebuild their certificates on a single closed scale from A to G. This EU directive had a transposition deadline (the final date by which an EU member state must update its national laws) of May 29 2026.

The new scale’s two anchors are elegant. Class A is reserved for zero-emission buildings: highly efficient homes using no fossil fuels. Class G is pegged to the worst-performing buildings in each country’s own stock at the moment the scale launches – so G means “among your nation’s worst”, wherever your home is. Countries may add an A+ or an A0 for buildings that beat the zero-emission threshold by at least 20% and generate more renewable energy than they consume. Europe has, for the first time, defined a grade for buildings better than zero.

À lire aussi :
Homes need more renewable energy tech – here’s how to make sure retrofits avoid creating e-waste

Ireland moved first. On May 24 2026, five days before the deadline, it collapsed its 15-band scale into eight that is still topped by A0 for strictly zero-emission homes, bound by several conditions.

But the tower is falling floor by floor, not in one demolition. The directive lets any country that rescaled its certificates between January 2019 and May 2024 postpone the change until the end of 2029.

France, which rebuilt its DPE in 2021, sits squarely in that window. Meanwhile most member states had not finalised their new class boundaries by the May deadline: the Netherlands was still drafting, Spain still consulting.

For the next few years, house-hunters comparing energy credentials across borders will meet old scales, new scales and transition arrangements simultaneously. Harmonisation, paradoxically, begins by adding confusion.

The UK’s different bet

And the UK? No longer bound by the directive, it is running the opposite experiment: abolishing the single headline letter altogether.

In England and Wales, the familiar A-G energy-efficiency rating (a score based largely on modelled energy costs and similiar to what the EU is moving towards) is to be replaced by four separate metrics: fabric performance, heating system, smart readiness and energy cost. Each of these are calculated under a new physics-based methodology called the home energy model.

This reform, originally due in October 2026, was delayed in March to the second half of 2027, with old and new certificates running side by side until October 2029.

Scotland has legislated its own version: three ratings, heat retention, heating system and energy cost, under regulations made in 2025.

The philosophical split is real. Brussels is betting that one simple, comparable letter drives renovation. London and Edinburgh are betting the single letter was the problem, that mashing insulation quality, heating carbon and running costs into one score hid exactly the information households needed, letting a poorly insulated home with a cheap gas boiler outscore a well-insulated one with an electric system.

In May, the King’s speech did announce a European Partnership Bill creating powers to “dynamically align” UK law with the EU’s. But look at the scope: farming and food, emissions trading and electricity trading – the three areas agreed at the 2025 UK-EU summit. Buildings are not on the list.

The bill does allow ministers to extend alignment to new areas once parliament approves future treaties, so the door is ajar.

For now, though, the position is quietly remarkable: Britain is legislating to align with EU rules on the electricity flowing through its wires, while deliberately diverging on how it labels the buildings the electricity flows into.

If you are buying, selling or renting in the next three years, check the date on any certificate: a label issued before your country’s rescaling means something different from one issued after, and most existing certificates remain valid for up to ten years.

Ask which scale it was issued under. And trust the number more than the letter: the kilowatt-hours per square metre, per year, printed beside the grade is the one language every scale, old and new, EU and UK, has in common.

The Babel tower is coming down – but until it does, the arithmetic travels better than the alphabet.

He collapsed and was rushed to hospital just days after returning home from a gruelling cycling challenge

Over £100,000 has been raised to support a Co Down dad battling an aggressive form of brain cancer.

The fundraising campaign has captured hearts across Northern Ireland after friends of Paul Collins, 42 and from Warrenpoint, launched an appeal to help him access specialist treatment following a devastating diagnosis of glioblastoma, an aggressive form of brain cancer.

The fundraiser has already surpassed its £100,000 target, with hundreds of people donating to support Paul’s treatment and recovery.

Paul is a devoted husband to Donna and father to three young daughters – two-year-old Sadie, Carly, aged 3, and four-year-old Millie.

A passionate cyclist and member of Armagh Down Cycling Club, he has completed some of Ireland’s toughest endurance events, including the Wicklow 200 and the Ring of Kerry.

In recent years, Paul also completed the gruelling Dragon Ride in Wales before taking on the Mallorca 312, a 312-kilometre endurance cycling event featuring around 4,700 metres of climbing. He returned this year and completed the challenge again in an impressive ten hours.

But just days after returning home, Paul collapsed and was rushed to hospital. Doctors discovered a mass on his brain on May 1 2026, and on May 14, he was diagnosed with glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive type of brain cancer that develops from cells called astrocytes, which support the brain’s nerve cells. It is one of the most common malignant brain tumours in adults and is known for its ability to grow rapidly.

Symptoms can vary depending on where the tumour develops but may include persistent headaches, seizures, changes in vision or speech, weakness or numbness, memory problems, confusion, and changes in personality or behaviour.

Treatment typically involves a combination of surgery, where possible, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Some patients may also be offered, or choose to explore, additional treatments such as clinical trials or specialist therapies, depending on their individual circumstances and the advice of their medical team.

Every person’s experience with glioblastoma is different, and outcomes can vary depending on factors such as the tumour’s location, overall health, and how the cancer responds to treatment.

Paul is currently undergoing a course of radiotherapy and chemotherapy at Belfast City Hospital, with treatment continuing until the end of July. He has also been accepted for treatment under Professor Gansange in Berg, Germany, where he is due to begin dendritic cell therapy on August 12.

Paul’s sister Colette told Belfast Live: “It was hard at the start, we were shocked by the diagnosis because Paul is so fit with his cycling. He’s having his treatment at the minute until the end of this month and there are good days and bad days.”

Dendritic cell therapy is a personalised form of immunotherapy that uses the body’s own immune cells to help recognise and attack cancer cells. The aim of the treatment is to stimulate the immune system to recognise and target tumour cells.

Research into dendritic cell therapy is ongoing, and its availability and evidence of benefit vary depending on the cancer type and treatment centre.

The overall cost of Paul’s treatment, travel and aftercare is expected to exceed £100,000, prompting friends and supporters to launch the GoFundMe page campaign, organised by Declan McConville.

The massive response so far has highlighted the strength of community spirit, with hundreds of donations helping bring the family closer to their fundraising target.

Anyone wishing to support Paul’s fundraiser can do so here.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Prime Minister’s Question took place eight hours before the World Cup semi-final between England and Argentina – and references to the match came thick and fast.

Conservative MP Graham Stuart joked that the prime minister had been given the “red card” by “400 dodgy referees”.

Liberal Democrat MP Will Forster asked Sir Keir if his last act would be to declare a bank holiday if England wins the World Cup.

The prime minister replied that he didn’t want to “tempt fate” and suggested Forster ask him again on Sunday.

There were also several references to the by-election in Clacton, triggered by the resignation of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.

The main parties are not taking part in the election, accusing Farage, who is re-fighting the constituency, of pulling a stunt, as he stands again in the Essex constituency.

The boycott means Farage’s opponents are largely either independent or novelty candidates.

Sir Keir suggested people in Clacton should “put your vote in the bin”.

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed said he could not “back joke figures with ridiculous policies” adding: “Which is why I’m supporting Count Binface.”

Reform UK MP Danny Kruger hit back at the jibes, arguing that a “comedian with a dustbin on his head” was a suitable substitute for the major parties.

Cabinet members had a whip round, organised by deputy prime minister David Lammy, to buy Sir Keir a vintage silver carriage clock as a leaving gift.

The clock, made in the 1920s by the firm responsible for building Big Ben, was presented to Sir Keir at his final cabinet meeting on Wednesday morning.

It included a plaque engraved with “Change promised, change fought for, change delivered. Thank you Keir – The Cabinet,” Downing Street said.

Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, has told the BBC he advised Sir Keir earlier this year to “stand fast” against challenges to his leadership.

In an interview with BBC Newsnight and 5 Live, he revealed he had been texting the prime minister before and after the local election results in May.

Pierce Brosnan and his wife Keely Shaye Smith enjoyed lunch together at celebrity hotspot E. Baldi in Beverly Hills on Tuesday. 

The actor, 73, appeared in high spirits as he left the eatery with a bag of goodies and a drink in hand. 

Keely, 62, looked lovely in a yellow cardigan, white floaty dress and Chanel sandals for the outing. 

They paid a visit to the upscale Italian restaurant which has seen a flurry of Hollywood stars walk through its doors in recent years. 

It was a rare appearance for Pierce and Keely, who have been married for 25 years. They first started dating in 1994. 

Keely, 62, looked lovely in a yellow cardigan, white floaty dress and Chanel sandals for the outing

Advertisement

They paid a visit to the upscale Italian restaurant which has seen a flurry of Hollywood stars walk through its doors in recent years

Keely told People she immediately found the Bond actor ‘captivating’ when they met and that he had a ‘mischievous sparkle in his eyes’.

In the same interview, the actor said of his wife: ‘I found a great woman in Keely Shaye. Not if I searched a million times over would I find one as good.’

The couple have two sons, Dylan, 29, and Paris, 25. 

Last year, Pierce said that Keely still makes his ‘world turn’, telling Fox News: ‘She still makes my heart sing and she still makes my world turn.

‘She allows me to go out into the world and create what I do as an actor, and that takes strength and stamina. We just enjoy each other’s company.’

In January, fans rushed to defend Keely after a vile troll shared comparison snaps of her to act as a ‘reminder to avoid marriage’. 

The couple are often deemed one of Hollywood’s great love stories, with their lengthy love defying the lore of short-lived romances, however on Sunday a vile X user claimed the couple showed marriage should be ‘avoided’. 

The comment was made alongside images of the couple on the red carpet at the Governers Ball for the Academy Awards in 1996 alongside a snap of the duo posing at the Mamma Mia! premiere in 2008.

Swarming with defensive messages, many insisted they were an advert for true love, with one user stating: ‘I don’t get some men on X devotion to degrade Brosnan’s wife. They’re both happy, aging gracefully, and she was & is absolutely gorgeous.’

One fan stated that Pierce had ‘won the lottery of life’: ‘Pierce Brosnan’s won the lottery of life. Dude’s been married 30 years and they’ve both aged gracefully.’ 

The couple are still very much in love and have been together since 1994 – they married in 2001 – (pictured in 1996) 

Advertisement

In January, Pierce’s fans hit out at a vile troll who shared comparison snaps of the star with his wife to act as a ‘reminder to avoid marriage’, with many saying they had been very lucky to have found such an enduring love 

 

Advertisement

Swarming with defensive messages, many insisted in response, that they were an advert for true love

Last week teaser images were released of Pierce in MobLand, after Tom Hardy’s ‘unexpected’ exit from the Paramount+ show 

Frequent rowing with directors over a delay in filming the third series of the drama had led to the actor, who plays fixer Harry Da Souza, walking away after its second run

Further messages from fans read: ‘Agreed. If you’re this shallow and stupid, you should avoid marriage at all costs. Sincerely, women everywhere… 

‘She is such a beautiful woman. How lucky they are to share that bond over so many years. Beautiful… Marriage is beautiful when you’re with the right person… he seems happy. they are lucky… This is unacceptable… 

‘Why? They are happy and value one another ? I don’t see what you’re getting at here ?… You couldn’t pick the worst example. First, she’s beautiful in both pictures and second they are glowing with organic happiness… 

‘Why, his wife is beautiful, intelligent, a loving partner and quality mom… What’s wrong with the picture?… Dear men and women. This is what lifelong love looks like…. Enjoy it. It’s hard to find. But you know when you do…’

Pierce was previously married to wife Cassandra Harris for 11 years but she died from cancer in 1991.

He adopted her two children, Charlotte and Christopher, from her previous marriage and they had one biological son together, Sean.

Last week teaser images were released of Pierce in MobLand after Tom Hardy’s ‘unexpected’ exit from the Paramount+ show.

Frequent rowing with directors over a delay in filming the third series of the drama had led to the actor, who plays fixer Harry Da Souza, walking away after its second run.

Despite fears that a second run could be delayed following claims that bosses were planning a hasty re-write in the wake of Tom’s exit, a new trailer released on Thursday confirmed the show will return on September 18.

New teaser images also showed Pierce, who plays the ruthless patriarch Conrad Harrigan, is being patched up by his wife Maeve following a nasty scuffle.

Once again the couple find themselves at the centre of rivalries that threaten to topple their empire.

The ten-episode second season will see the Harrigans struggle to show a unified front as rising rivals threaten their fractured criminal empire.

Harry Da Souza, their street-smart and formidable ‘fixer’ who is played by Tom, must walk a dangerous tightrope when tensions within the family intensify. 

As violence spills into every corner of their lives, loyalties snap, safety proves temporary, and the battle for power leaves no room for mercy. 

The second series will be released on Friday September 18,. 

Actor Sam Neill died at the age of 78 from pneumonia, it has been confirmed.

Neill’s manager, Philip Grenz, told TMZ that the Jurassic Park star had succumbed to the illness.

Neill had previously battled lymphoma with success after undergoing CAR-T therapy, a new treatment, Neill’s manager told the outlet.

In 2023, Neill disclosed that he had been diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. He died on Monday in Sydney, according to a statement posted to the actor’s social media page.

His death was ‘sudden and unexpected,’ the statement said, adding that he ‘remained cancer-free’ at the time of his death. A cause of death wasn’t specified at the time. ‘Sam was surrounded by family and passed with the dignity that has characterized his whole life,’ his family wrote.

In terms of funeral plans, Grenz told the outlet that his family is putting together a small service at his farm in New Zealand with a select number of friends and relatives set to attend.

Neill’s manager Philip Grenz confirmed the Jurassic Park actor’s cause of death to TMZ following his passing on Monday in Sydney. Pictured 2025 in Auckland, New Zealand

There will not be a large public gathering or celebration of life in accordance with the wishes of the actor, who preferred to keep things low-key, his manager said.

Neill had worked on four consecutive projects in the past year, his manager told the outlet, noting that they are expected to be released in the next few months.

Following announcement of Neill’s passing, tributes were paid by fellow actors and directors, including Steven Spielberg, who helmed the first Jurassic Park movie.

‘I adored making all the Jurassic movies with him. Along with Laura Dern and Jeff Goldblum, we will always have our Jurassic family and Sam will never be forgotten by us or his many millions of fans around the world,’ Spielberg said in a statement.

Actor Sharon Lawrence wrote on Instagram: ‘Condolences and appreciation for the immense joy and mastery Sam Neill brought our industry.’

Neill was one of a host of actors and directors who achieved international fame after an explosion of Australian films that began in the late 1970s, along with Paul Hogan, Mel Gibson, Geoffrey Rush, Russell Crowe, Jane Campion, Peter Weir and Gillian Armstrong. 

His range was remarkable, playing opposite Helena Bonham Carter in the Alan Ayckbourn comedy Sweet Revenge to chopping off Hunter’s finger in The Piano to poking his own eyes out in the sci-fi horror Event Horizon. 

He portrayed both saintly and sinner: In Omen III: The Final Conflict, he played Damien the Antichrist, and he also played Cardinal Thomas Wolsey in The Tudors. 

The actor first came to the attention of international audiences in Armstrong’s 1979 film My Brilliant Career, which also introduced Judy Davis. He later appeared in Phillip Noyce’s Dead Calm, a classy thriller set at sea and co-starring the then-relatively unknown Nicole Kidman.

Neill twice co-starred with Meryl Streep, in Australian director Fred Schepisi’s Plenty  and – again for Schepisi – in A Cry in the Dark, a film about the sensationalized aftermath of a dingo killing a baby in the Australian Outback.

Neill played paleontologist Alan Grant in the Jurassic Park film franchise 

Advertisement

Following announcement of Neill’s passing, tributes were paid by fellow actors and directors. Pictured 2019 

He earned an Emmy nomination for his performance in the title role of the 1998 miniseries Merlin and another as narrator of 2017’s Wild New Zealand. 

Neill also earned three Golden Globe nods – for Merlin, One Against the Wind and Reilly: Ace of Spies.

Richard E. Grant, a longtime friend who co-starred with Neill in 2019’s Palm Beach,  described him in a post on Instagram as ‘an officer and a gentleman in the truest sense.’ 

Grant said Neill had ‘guided and helped me through a very difficult time in my life.’

Perhaps Neill achieved his highest level of fame in Jurassic Park, playing paleontologist Alan Grant, who is summoned to an island off Costa Rica where a theme park has been built to house herds of cloned dinosaurs.

His character was thoughtful and reasonable, a scientist who warned the mastermind of the theme park before the chaos: ‘Dinosaurs and man, two species separated by 65 million years of evolution have just been suddenly thrown back into the mix together. How can we possibly have the slightest idea what to expect?’

Grant survived the harrowing events when the creatures get loose, but didn’t return for The Lost World: Jurassic Park II in 1997. He came back for the third episode in 2001 and Jurassic World: Dominion in 2022.

‘It’s probably a little late to learn these things,’ he told the New York Daily News in 2001, ‘but I finally feel I’ve worked out how to be an action hero. I’m happier with Grant this time. He’s gnarly and grizzled, but he looks like he knows what he’s doing.’

Cara Delevingne has described what it was like shooting her raciest magazine cover to date for Playboy.

The supermodel, 33, put on a very racy display as she wore red heart-shaped pasties in one shot, before covering her modesty in foam.

Cara went topless and modelled a series of sexy lingerie sets in the sizzling photoshoot.

The actress, who was the first lesbian to grace Playboy magazine, declared: ‘It’s so fun being naked’, as she reflected on the shoot.

She added: ‘I love the sense in the freedom of owning my sexuality and owning my body and I think for the first time instead of getting naked for a brand or an editorial, this felt more like my choice.

‘Like, of course it’s always been my choice, but it felt like something so liberating. That to me is sexy.

The supermodel, 33, put on a very racy display as she wore red heart-shaped pasties in one shot, before covering her modesty in foam

‘I was texting my girlfriend earlier and I was sending her the photos and she was like “Oh my god, you look so pretty”. And I was like “But I’m just a silly baby pretending to be a sexy lady and sometimes that’s how it feels.

‘You know, everyone has that kind of polarity and dichotomy and so kind of playing within that and still having fun while trying on this, like I’m a sexy woman because you can be all of those things.’

Playboy detailed: ‘In her prime, Delevingne is also making history. She’s the first out lesbian woman to appear on the print cover of Playboy…

‘To mark the occasion, she also dons the iconic Bunny Suit, becoming the first supermodel to do so for the magazine since Kate Moss in 2014.’

In the shoot, Cara was lighting up a cigarette with a match while pulling a smoldering pose and showing off her tattoos along her arms. 

Another shot saw the musician prowling towards the camera in red lingerie while her image was displayed on a vast screen alongside.  

Cara was sending temperatures soaring in the snaps, as she bowed into the sizzling nature of the saucy bible – with very little left to the imagination. 

Another image saw her slip into the classic Playboy ensemble comprising a corset, bowtie, bunny ears and cuffs. 

She gave a further nod to the Playboy look of days gone by as an image gave a full shot of her bunnytailed bottom, cuffs and Playboy cufflinks. 

Cara went topless and modelled a series of sexy lingerie sets in the sizzling photoshoot

The actress, who was the first lesbian to grace Playboy magazine, declared: ‘It’s so fun being naked’, as she reflected on the shoot

Advertisement

It was her raciest shoot yet 

Cara deemed her cover appearance ‘powerful’, saying: ‘Of course, Playboy is very much a heterosexual institution. That’s why it felt like a bit of a “f**k you” and a rebellious thing to do, and to have an incredible female-led creative team – a lot of them being queer – felt really fun and different.’

Speaking about stripping off, she said: ‘I’ve been naked before in shoots, in movies. But it always made me feel a bit gross when it was for someone else – of course, it was my choice and I agreed to it, but it never felt empowering…

‘I didn’t feel great after it. But today I had so much fun. I’ve never felt more comfortable in my body and in my sexuality. I feel like I’m in more of my prime as a woman and as a sexual being.’

Alongside her shoot, she spoke about her music career and how she wanted her music to go out under a different name to avoid ‘preconceived ideas’. 

Away from her modelling and on to her music, Cara reflected on her new career. In April, she launched her music career, as she announced a tour and posted clips of her songs I Forgot and Out of My Head on social media.

She said: ‘Originally, I wanted to release the music under a different name so no one would know it was me, because I just wanted it to go out there…

‘But I didn’t want the preconceived ideas – how many people are going to say it’s bad without even listening to it?

‘Of course, I accept that – people might think it’s bad whether they know or care if it’s me or not. But that’s not why I’ve done it.’

Cara was truly back to her best in the shoot, which comes after she revealed she suffered a near-fatal overdose at the height of her drug addiction, after admitting she lost multiple modelling jobs due to her struggles.

The model has previously opened up about her battles with addiction, which led her to check herself into a 12-step program after photos emerged of the star looking dishevelled and jittery at Van Nuys airport.

Another shot saw Cara prowling towards the camera in red lingerie while her image was displayed on a vast screen alongside

Advertisement

Another shot saw her slip into the classic Playboy ensemble comprising a corset, bowtie, bunny ears and cuffs

She wore the PVC corset while posing on a red carpet while using dark lighting to protect her modesty 

She gave a further nod to the Playboy look of days gone by as an image gave a full shot of her bunnytailed bottom, cuffs and Playboy cufflinks

Another image saw the stunner with grungey hair while holding a lit match in her mouth 

Advertisement

Cara has now shared that she was taken to hospital and given a dose of naloxone after overdosing on what she believed was ‘opiates in cocaine.’

She also reflected on the ‘horrible’ fallout from the snaps, admitting she’d had a ‘seizure’ just minutes before due to the drugs she had taken at Burning Man Festival.

Sharing the impact her drug addiction had on her career, Cara said: ‘Yeah, it’s not a good look. As a model, you’re meant to upkeep the brand’s standards in some way. Like, it’s in contracts that you sign.

‘It went super quiet. Everyone went very silent. And I knew I needed to get sober, so I medically was weaned off GBL [gamma-butyrolactone], which probably is the hardest one to come off.

‘But I couldn’t do it at home. I couldn’t deal because the more sober I got, the more I realised how badly I f***ed up, and that just was too much.’

Speaking on The Louis Theroux Podcast, Cara added: ‘So, I couldn’t stay sober, and then I overdosed because I think there was opiates in the cocaine I think I’d bought or something.

‘So I was narcanned [given a dose of naloxone, which reverses the impacts of opioid overdose], was in hospital, and that’s really when everything happened because when I woke up.’

Louis explained: ‘For people who don’t know, it’s the kind of quick fix, knocks the fentanyl off your neuroreceptors. You’re revived almost in the middle of overdosing.’

During a talk at the Great Yorkshire Show on Wednesday (July 15), the TV star let the audience know that he’s currently filming the 23rd series of The Yorkshire Vet and has a four-part ‘At Home with the Greens’ series in the pipeline too.

He has also been over to India recently to film ‘A Passage to India: A Yorkshire Vet Special’, which saw him join colleague Rohin to explore Punjab, where he said that he had a “fantastic time,” despite calling part of the journey “utter chaos”.

During the trip to India, Peter said that he and Rohin went to a festival dressed in traditional Punjabi outfits, but thought he “looked like a dog’s dinner,” which also saw the pair have a go at traditional dancing and customs over there.

Joking about the experience, he said: “It reminded me of Del Boy and Rodney when they dressed as Batman and Robin in Only Fools and Horses.”

GYS26 Peter Wright visits the Primary Schools Veg Box competition at the Great Yorkshire Show (Image: GREAT YORKSHIRE SHOW)

He admitted that the main TV series almost didn’t happen after he told producers when it first started, “I don’t think it will work”.

However, 22 series later, he was proven wrong and has claimed “it’s the most unusual but most rewarding job”

Talking to host Christine Talbot, the vet said: “I didn’t think the concept would work; plenty of people have done TV shows on animal hospitals and vet practices, and I told producers I didn’t think it would work.

“But producers said to me, ‘You have to trust us, Peter’. They always recall this story back to me.”

GYS26 Peter Wright visits the Primary Schools Veg Box Competition at the Great Yorkshire Show. Pictured with kids from Richard Taylor primary school, Harrogate (Image: GREAT YORKSHIRE SHOW)

GYS26 Peter Wright visits the Primary Schools Veg Box Competition at the Great Yorkshire Show. Pictured with Sophie McCandlish (Image: GREAT YORKSHIRE SHOW)

Host Christine even asked Peter if he’d like to have a go on Strictly Come Dancing, which he firmly replied “no” to.

He went on to praise India and its culture, saying that “everyone was happy and the people are so resourceful.”

Later in the conversation, he opened up about the fact that he was the only one of the crew who went over to India who avoided illness, crediting avoiding “dicey” items at McDonald’s as his saving grace.

The conversation ended with Peter talking about his connections to the TV show All Creatures Great and Small, while also saying that it’s “lovely” to meet the future generations of vets that he’s helped to inspire along the way.

“I tell them the same thing, it’s brilliant that you want to be a vet but you must work hard.”

The Belarusian dictator, Alexander Lukashenko, spoke at a ceremony for military graduates and officers on July 6. He predictably mentioned the war in neighbouring Ukraine. “No one is going to send you into this slaughter,” he assured them, “we do not need war; it is tragic that it is going on in Ukraine.”

Yet, arguably, Lukashenko has in fact needed the war. After almost being toppled by mass street protests in August 2020 following a flagrantly rigged presidential election, it was Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine a year and a half later that finally helped him cow his domestic opponents. He claimed to offer stability where political unrest could turn Belarus into another Ukraine.

Nowadays, however, the opposite might be the case. It is the exiled Belarusian opposition that could be helped by the tragedy in Ukraine, with Lukashenko facing reported pressure from Russia to become more deeply involved in the war and Ukraine ratcheting up the pressure on him not to.

Belarus is already involved in the war in many ways. Russia used Belarusian territory as a staging area for its full-scale invasion in February 2022 and, throughout that year, fired missiles into Ukraine from Belarus. Ever since, Lukashenko has sought to take advantage of the conflict while keeping his own troops safely in their barracks.

The war has boosted an economy weighed down by western sanctions. Belarusian factories produce weapons and ammunition for the Russian military, while others work on repairs or routine maintenance. More recently, as Ukraine has stepped up drone attacks on Russian oil and gas infrastructure, it has made sense for Russia to increase its use of two large oil refineries in Belarus which have been safe from attack.

For Lukashenko personally, the war provided an opportunity to reassert control over society. Having almost ousted Lukashenko in 2020, Belarusian citizens resigned themselves to the status quo. Chatham House opinion polls suggest that people swallowed Lukashenko’s claim that he was keeping Belarus out of the war.

The authorities could also take advantage of international observers’ distraction to double down on repressions inside the country, where hundreds of political prisoners remain. Silencing domestic dissent has been a wartime benefit to Lukashenko. But he has also had to walk a tightrope, giving enough support to Russia’s war effort to convince it he is a loyal and valuable ally and not enough for hostilities to spread to Belarusian territory.

Treading between two fires

Throughout 2026, as Russia has struggled on the battlefield, speculation has grown that the Kremlin wants Belarus’s involvement in the war to increase. In May, Ukrainian officials said their intelligence agencies had information that Russia wanted to mount a new offensive against Ukraine from Belarus.

With the impetus in the war on Ukraine’s side, the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, might welcome the opportunity to open a new front in northern Ukraine. But there are drawbacks. The Belarusian oil refineries, which have not been treated as military targets while Belarus’s troops have stayed out of the war, would be vulnerable to attack. And as integrated as Belarusian troops are into Russia’s military planning, their lack of combat experience might create problems were they directly involved.

Lukashenko is also feeling a lot more pressure from Ukraine, which recently accused him of letting Russia use signal relay equipment in Belarus to guide drones towards targets. On June 19, the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, gave an ultimatum. He told Belarus to dismantle the relay stations or else Ukraine “would do it” itself.

This was understood as a threat to strike targets inside Belarus, and reports suggest the relay stations were switched off on June 22. In the meantime, Lukashenko hurried to Russia for closed-door discussions with Putin. The Wall Street Journal cited sources stating Moscow was trying to coax Belarus to abandon its pretence of neutrality.

The less noticed aspect of these developments is the Ukrainian side’s growing engagement with the exiled Belarusian opposition. After February 2022, the Ukrainian authorities steered a pragmatic course in an effort to persuade Lukashenko to stay out of the fighting.

This meant not provoking the authorities in Minsk. As a corollary, the Ukrainians limited their contacts with the exiled opposition – the Belarusian democracy movement, as it prefers to be known – and its figurehead Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. However, from the beginning of 2026, Ukrainian officials have changed tack.

In late January, Zelensky and Tsikhanouskaya had their first official sit-down meeting. Tsikhanouskaya then travelled to Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, for a series of high-level meetings in May. These included meetings with Zelensky and the Ukrainian foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha.

She has also opened a “diplomatic mission” for the Belarusian democracy movement in Kyiv, and meetings between Ukrainian officials and Tsikhanouskaya’s office are becoming commonplace.

As Lukashenko’s highwire act teeters, Ukraine seems keen to aid his opponents. They have, in turn, become more adept at drawing attention to Lukashenko’s possible war preparations, pointing to military modernisation and the militarisation of society in Belarus.

The deeper Lukashenko involves Belarus in the war, the greater the motivation for Ukraine to support the Belarusian democrats, who share its objective of resisting Russian imperialism. It is a bold bet by Ukraine. But after years of resisting Russia, it would be a mistake to underestimate their odds of success in helping Lukashenko’s opponents prevail.