Alex Polizzi made a return to our TV screens and helped a family transform their budget bed and breakfast

The Hotel Inspector’s Alex Polizzi was quick to issue an ultimatum to some hotel owners as she spotted a big problem. During Thursday’s (March 19) episode of the Channel 5 hit show, Alex was in the sprawling commuter town of Horley, to check into Gatwick Turret.

The budget bed and breakfast is run by 62-year-old Ram, 61-year-old Anj and their 37-year-old son, Rai. The 10-bedroomed Victorian guest house is just a mile down the road from Gatwick Airport, where over 250,000 flights carry up to 46 million passengers every year.

It seems like a great location for a hotel as a lot of people will be needing somewhere to stay before or after their getaways. However there is a lot of competition as Gatwick Turret is one of over 100 hotels, including big chain brands, fiercely vying for their business.

As the hotel owners wrestle with high overheads in a highly competitive market, the family have no choice but to run the hotel almost single-handedly to keep staffing costs down.

Advertisement

And Rai has a lot on his hands as the running of the hotel has recently been passed down to him and it’s all on him to turn things around for Mum and Dad and find a way of making a profit.

Alex knew she had a lot to do to help transform the hotel as she found mismatched décor and too many running costs. And before she could even get stuck in she was quick to spot a problem as she discovered that despite their hard work, the business is barely breaking even and the family are struggling to pay themselves.

Alex asked: “Tell me about what it cost you to put on a room?” Rai explained: “Each room costs around £4.20 for the linen. The tea, coffee tray, a bottle of water…”

Before he could finish his sentence, Alex jumped in: “It’s expensive water. I wouldn’t put a very expensive bottle of water in the room. So what does it cost?” Rai continued: “£3.20.”

Alex explained: “Adding to cost per room are roughly £6 on housekeeping, £9 towards the £350,000 pound mortgage, £24 on utilities and taxes and £9 commission for those pesky online booking sites.”

She continued: “So, the grand total of that, my dears, is £56. Lucky lucky you, all this work and all this headache and you’re making a profit of about £4 a night per year – not quite enough for retirement.”

Alex admitted: “There is obviously a problem.” She then asked: “Do you pay yourselves? Rai revealed: “A £1,000 each.” It was clear Alex was stunned as she gasped: “A £1,000 each a month. Gosh darling, I mean, I’m surprised the government allows it, you’re not even making minimum wage.”

Alex gave the owners an ultimatum as she later added: “So we either need to make more money or sell it off.”

After an intense few days of renovations and small changes, Alex managed to help the family turn things around and business seems to be heading in the right direction as Rai revealed that they are now making an extra £140 a week with their breakfast room and they managed to get some positive press.

You can stream The Hotel Inspector on Channel 5

Both sides emerge from the tunnel at Villa Park and we are moments away from kick-off. The home fans pay tribute to their manager bringing up 100 wins in charge of Villa. Here is a reminder of how the two sides line up tonight:

Aston Villa: Martinez, Bogarde, Lindelof, Torres, Maatsen, Luiz, Onana, McGinn, Rogers, Sancho, Abraham.
Substitutes: Bizot, Wright, Mings, Konsa, Digne, Cash, Garcia, Elliott, Buendia, Bailey, Watkins.

Lille: Ozer, Ngoy, Alexsandro, Mbemba, Perraud, Bouaddi, Bentalab, Mukau, Meunier, Giroud, Correia.
Substitutes: Bodart, Lanssade, Fernandez-Pardo, Haraldsson, Edjouma, Tiago Santos, Mandi, Verdonk, Diaoune, Baret, Boussadia.

When questioned, Mr Grewal stated that this was a private booking. During Wednesday’s hearing, Mrs Grewal blamed the former manager, and claimed that as soon as she was told about what was happening they closed it down. Robert Dear, a council licence officer corrected Mrs Grewal, reminding her that it was in fact the authorities that shut down the party.

The passenger, who suffers from a severe air-borne nut allergy became unwell on the Belfast bound flight on Sunday

A passenger at the centre of an emergency diversion on a Belfast-bound flight has criticised easyJet, claiming he was left stranded in France and forced to spend more than £3,000 getting home despite complying with the airline’s requirements.

The Malaga to Belfast International Airport service was diverted to Brest on Sunday after the man, who has a severe airborne nut allergy, became unwell mid-flight. Emergency services met the aircraft on arrival and he received medical treatment before being discharged.

While the airline said the passenger was able to continue his journey, he has since contacted Belfast Live to dispute that account, alleging he was denied boarding on a later flight and left to arrange his own return to Northern Ireland via multiple connections.

The passenger, who asked not to be named, said he had followed all instructions given by the airline, including obtaining a medical certificate confirming he was fit to fly and providing evidence of additional medication.

“I telephoned easyJet and there was a flight from Brest to Gatwick that evening, and there was a flight then from Gatwick to Belfast International at 6 o’clock the following morning. EasyJet booked me on to both of those and my travelling companion. That was fine,” he said.

“I then said that I would find a hotel and I would be back at the airport in the morning because at that point all I wished to do was lie down. However, an exceptional lady who was the manager of check-in and ground staff approached me and said there is one problem. EasyJet were requesting a fitness to fly certificate before they would allow me on the flight to Gatwick this evening.

“I said, that’s fine and asked where the closest medical clinic was. So I went to the medical centre and a doctor carried out a head-to-toe medical. She said, you’re absolutely perfectly able to fly. There is no indication otherwise, and my blood pressure and pulse had both returned to normal.”

The passenger returned to the airport with the fitness-to-fly certificate, and the ground manager forwarded it to easyJet. In addition to that, easyJet then requested proof that he was travelling with more EpiPens.

“As a standard precaution, I will only put my foot onto an aircraft with six, so I produced the other four,” he said.

“They asked how I could prove they had not been used, and I explained that fully. We then waited hours before easyJet came back and said that was fine.”

The passenger said he was then stopped at the gate and told he would not be allowed to board the flight to London.

“I then went to the boarding gate and I was told at the boarding gate for the flight to London Gatwick that the pilot did not want me on the aircraft.

“I asked, could I speak to the pilot. The pilot refused to have any conversation. He said, no, he is not getting onto my aircraft.

“At that juncture, I then had to go back to security, be readmitted to France on my passport. And I then discovered to my horror that there were no other easyJet flights for a few days.”

He said he was ultimately forced to make his own way home via Paris, London and Dublin, incurring significant costs along the way.

“I had phoned easyJet, who were at best disinterested and at worst, couldn’t give a damn. I had adhered to every single thing that they had asked me to do. I had gone to a medical facility. I had had the most thorough medical I’ve ever had in my life. I produced a certificate of fitness to fly. I had proven that I had a quartet remaining of EpiPens. And then they wouldn’t allow me to fly.

“For me to be out in excess of £3000, I think is outrageous.”

He also criticised the airline’s public statement following the incident, which said the passenger had been able to continue his journey.

“When I read easyJet’s statement saying that they had got the passenger safely home on Sunday night on a later flight, I was incandescent.

“That is utter nonsense. I did not get home until the following day after travelling on multiple flights.

“They put me at more danger because I was sitting on longer flights. If I had not had the funds available, what was I meant to do?”

Belfast Live asked easyJet to clarify why they had initially advised that the passenger had travelled home later on Sunday, whether he would be compensated for the money that he had to spend in seeking alternative travel arrangements and whether he would be banned from other easyJet flights in the future.

An easyJet spokesperson said: “When we responded, it was our understanding that there were arrangements for the passenger to travel later that day on an alternative easyJet flight, and we had not yet become aware that he was unfortunately unable to travel on this flight, which meant he travelled with an alternative carrier the next day instead.”

It is understood that the easyJet customer support team have been in touch with the customer to ensure he is reimbursed for his alternative travel expenses, and to look into his feedback on his experience.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

When Winnie-the-Pooh gets stuck in Rabbit’s doorway after eating too much for elevenses, he is anxious and gloomy at the thought of having to forgo food for a whole week to get out. He asks Christopher Robin to read him “a Sustaining Book, such as would help and comfort a Wedged Bear in Great Tightness”.

A.A. Milne’s first children’s novel, Winnie-the-Pooh, does not exactly explain what a “Sustaining Book” is. But E.H. Shepard’s illustration provides some clue. Christopher Robin is shown reading an alphabet book with the word JAM for J visible on the page.

Jam is not Pooh’s favourite food, of course, but the word is more than apt. Pooh is in a jam, but being read to sustains him in his difficult situation by bringing him comfort. The book acts as “an aid in the crisis”, as former teacher Ethel Newell noted in a study of bibliotherapy for children in 1957.

Dating back to the early 19th century, bibliotherapy is a therapeutic approach that fosters reading books and other forms of literature to support mental wellbeing and healing.

This year marks the centenary of the first Winnie-the-Pooh book. Milne based the timeless tales on the nursery toys and games of his son, Christopher Robin – the boy who lives in the fictional world of the Hundred Acre Wood. His adventures with his bear, Winnie-the-Pooh, and friends (Piglet, Eeyore, Kanga and Roo, Rabbit and Owl), are equally gentle, clever and funny – and above all, comforting.

The book was an overnight success when it was first published (as was its sequel, The House at Pooh Corner, in 1928), and continues to cheer readers world over.

Literary caregiving

When Winnie-the-Pooh was published, books had been used in hospital libraries to alleviate the suffering of ill and wounded soldiers from the first world war. This idea of books as a source of comfort was not new, but there had been an increasing need in this period for what authors Sara Halsam and Edmund G.C. King term “literary caregiving”.

It was at this time that American journalist Samuel McChord Crothers coined the term bibliotherapy, and reading for wellbeing began to be recognised in the medical sphere.

Milne had himself fought in the war and experienced the suffering and trauma firsthand. Winnie-the-Pooh has long been considered a response to war, particularly in terms of the book’s nostalgia and depiction of psychological damage. But as an example of bibliotherapy – and how this too is tied to the war – Winnie-the-Pooh has received scant critical attention.

It is, of course, not just soldiers – nor bears in rabbit burrows – who need good books. Children stuck in hospital need them too. Undergoing medical treatment, especially for serious illness, can be one of the greatest challenges a child can face, as highlighted by the Read for Good initiative.

This hospital reading programme has run in 31 hospitals across the UK over the past 15 years, and has found that books and storytelling can “have a significant impact on children’s health, wellbeing and education” – at a time when children are facing illness or injury, missing out on schooling, and feeling isolated.

While Winnie-the-Pooh is not currently among the books in the Read for Good hospitals programme in the UK, the benefits of this children’s novel in hospitals have long been evident in initiatives in the US.

In 1999, the University of Florida launched a reading programme for the waiting room at the University’s Pediatric Continuity Care Clinic. One report describes a four-year-old girl who, nervously awaiting treatment, was calmed when Winnie-the-Pooh was read to her. And, just like Pooh being taught his ABCs, the child also learned new vocabulary from the story.

This programme is part of the Reach Out and Read campaign, endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which serves 4.8 million children across the US each year. Continued research efforts evaluate and maximise the impact of this initiative, and have found that there are positive results for children, families and clinicians.

More recently, in 2024 there was study of the parent-led Little Bookworms bedside reading programme in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Nashville.

Winnie-the-Pooh was selected as a book from childhood recommended by study participants to read with their infants, to “reduce anxiety and improve attachment for parents and caregivers who have infants in the NICU”. Supporting the wellbeing and engagement of carers in this way can help reduce some of the risks NICU infants face, including interruptions to language development which can affect subsequent literacy development.

Books to grow up with

More broadly, the potential of rereading a childhood book cannot be underestimated. Books read in childhood do not disappear, but “continue to unfold and inform the way in which we interpret the world” in our minds, as children’s literature expert Kimberley Reynolds of Newcastle University has established.

Paula Byrne, founder of the ReLit Foundation – which promotes reading as a way to combat stress and anxiety through “the slow reading of great literature” – has described the rereading of Winnie-the-Pooh in adulthood as therapeutic. Byrne believes the book has the capacity to grow with the reader from childhood to adulthood, offering new insights that can be appreciated in later life.

It is this ability of a book to grow with the reader that is of most help to children in distress, Newell suggested, providing “real armour” to children over a sustained period, and not just “a shot of penicillin for a particular infection”.

Over the past 100 years, Winnie-the-Pooh has grown from a book containing an example of bibliotherapy to a book for bibliotherapy in hospitals. As we celebrate the centenary of its publication, these ties to books as therapy for children and adults are well worth remembering.

As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our
articles.

Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local
services.

These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local
community.

It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need
as much support as possible during these challenging times.

Taylor Frankie Paul’s edition of The Bachelorette will not air after a violent video of her 2023 assault involving her ex, Dakota Mortensen, was leaked just days before the season was slated to premiere.

The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives star’s season of The Bachelorette, which wrapped filming in December, was ready to debut Sunday when the network announced Thursday that the show will not go forward as planned.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” Disney said in a statement.

The video and Bachelorette cancelation come days after fresh domestic violence allegations against Paul, 31, triggered widespread backlash. Paul and Mortensen — who is the father of her youngest child — were previously involved in a domestic violence incident in 2023.

Paul was arrested and charged with aggravated assault in 2023 following an altercation with Mortensen that was chronicled on season one of SLOMW, the Hulu reality show that catapulted the mom-of-three to stardom. In August of that year, she pleaded guilty to a third-degree felony count of aggravated assault; the other charges of criminal mischief and domestic violence against her were dropped. Paul is serving three years’ probation from that case. Another charge would violate her probation, which is set to end in August.

Video of the 2023 incident was leaked Thursday to TMZ, showing Paul repeatedly attacking Mortensen, kicking him and putting him in a headlock.

“This is called physical abuse,” Mortensen said in the video as he pushed her away. “See Taylor, this is all you do.”

She then threw multiple metal barstools at him while her daughter, who was present in the room, began to cry.

“Your daughter is right here,” Mortensen yelled before Paul went on to throw two more stools. Mortensen then repeatedly accused Paul of being drunk.

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

Advertisement

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

After the disturbing footage came to light, Paul released a statement through her representatives to Variety: “It’s sad to see the latest installment of his never-ending, desperate, attention-seeking, destructive campaign to harm Taylor without any regard for the consequences for their child.

“Releasing an old video, which conveniently omits context, on their son’s birthday is a reprehensible attempt to distract from his own behavior. Thankfully, the public has seen this act before and knows who he is and sadly, many will recognize this pattern of manipulation, both in his actions on the show, and from their own experiences,” her representatives said.

Paul’s representatives then released another statement addressing the cancelation of The Bachelorette.

“Taylor is very grateful for ABC’s support as she prioritizes her family’s safety and security. After years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm,” the statement from her spokesperson read, per Variety. “There are too many women who are suffering in silence as they survive aggressive, jealous ex-partners who refuse to let them move on with their lives.

“Taylor has remained silent out of fear of further abuse, retaliation, and public shaming. She is currently exploring all of her options, seeking support, and preparing to own and share her story.”

News broke earlier this week that season five of SLOMW had paused production due to an alleged domestic dispute between Paul and Mortensen that happened February 24 and February 25. Draper City police said that allegations were made by both Paul and Mortensen and that no charges had been filed. Police refused to comment further to The Independent on the incident, citing the pending investigation.

Despite speculation over SLOMW’s hiatus from filming, Paul continued on her planned Bachelorette press tour throughout the week and doubled down on blaming Mortensen for the investigation.

Speaking about the backlash Wednesday on Good Morning America, Paul said, “It’s supposed to be an exciting time. I’m a person that always speaks her truth, that’s what I’m known for. When the time is right, I will be.”

Paul was announced as the lead of The Bachelorette in September, marking the first time that a person outside of the franchise had been chosen for the role.

The national domestic abuse helpline offers support for women on 0808 2000 247, or you can visit the Refuge website. There is a dedicated men’s advice line on 0808 8010 327. Those in the US can call the domestic violence hotline on 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Other international helplines can be found via www.befrienders.org

VAR could have new powers in the Premier League next season after the game’s law-making body IFAB greenlighted a proposed expansion which will be on show at the World Cup

The Premier League will canvass its clubs on whether they want to allow VAR to check corner kick awards from next season.

The game’s law-making body, the International Football Association Board (IFAB), has given competitions the option of checking corners from this summer onwards, provided it causes no delay to the kick being taken.

The option is being taken up for this summer’s World Cup in North America, but the Premier League still has a decision to make over whether it wishes to introduce the change for next season.

Clubs were briefed about the law changes by the league’s director of football Tony Scholes at a meeting on Thursday, and the Press Association understands a survey will be sent out to clubs seeking their views.

JOIN US ON FACEBOOK! Latest news, analysis and much more on Mirror Football’s Facebook page

READ MORE: Noa Lang shares photo after surgery on injury as Galatasaray threaten legal actionREAD MORE: Pep Guardiola’s potential replacement speaks out on Man City switch – ‘I’m ready’

Meanwhile, UEFA is set to bring together the Premier League and other European top divisions this summer in an effort to find common ground on VAR.

The Press Association understands there is a determination within UEFA to reach an alignment on how the VAR protocol is interpreted, and that efforts to find a more unified approach for next season will be discussed after this summer’s World Cup.

UEFA’s referees chief Roberto Rosetti said last month at a briefing in Brussels that VAR was in danger of straying away from its original mission of correcting clear and obvious mistakes and becoming too “microscopic”.

HAVE YOUR SAY! What do you make of VAR ruling on corners? Comment below.

“I believe we need to, at the end of the season, speak about this, because we cannot go in this direction of microscopic VAR intervention,” Rosetti said. “We love football like it is.”

Speaking about one example where there were different interpretations – handball – Rosetti added: “I believe that in Europe, we must speak only one technical language. For us, this is the target. We cannot speak different technical languages across Europe. It’s not good.

“We need only one technical interpretation. We are speaking a lot. We were speaking a lot before the season – we need to speak again.”

As of February 13, the Premier League compared favourably to the Champions League on the average number of on-field reviews per game – 0.15 this season compared to 0.36 in the premier European competition.

Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

£49

£35

Sky

Advertisement

Get the deal here

Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle for the 2025/26 season, saving £336 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

Sky shows at least 215 live Premier League games each season, an increase of up to 100, plus Formula 1, darts, golf and more.

The walls are finally closing on Megan Walsh (Beth Nixon) in tonight’s Coronation Street, when Leanne Battersby (Jane Danson) and Eva Price (Catherine Tyldesley) find the proof to bring the child predator down.

It’s been a long time coming. For months, Megan has been grooming underage pupil Will Driscoll (Lucas-Hodgson-Wale) into an illicit relationship right under the nose of his unsuspecting family.

She exploited her status as an athletics coach and a teacher to appear beyond reproach in the eyes of Will’s dad Ben Driscoll (Aaron McCusker), stepmother Eva Price, and grandmother Maggie Driscoll (Pauline McLynn). The abuser even started a relationship with Weatherfield High’s Daniel Osbourne (Rob Mallard) as the perfect cover.

Justice comes in all shapes and sizes, and for Megan, it came in the form of schoolboy sleuth Sam Blakeman (Jude Riordan), Leanne’s adoptive son.

As Will’s friend, he sensed something was off about his dynamic with Miss Walsh and became determined to expose the monster. However, Megan fought back by sabotaging his grades in school, prompting a spiralling Sam to take unprescribed Ritalin in a desperate effort to boost his academic performance.

This would ultimately prove to be Megan’s undoing. After Sam suffered a shock collapse on the street, he was rushed to hospital where a concerned Leanne, Toyah Battersby (Georgia Taylor) and Eva finally get him to admit what’s wrong… and they were rocked to learn that Megan has been sleeping with Will.

The devastating revelation rocked the Driscolls and the Barlows/Battersbys to their core. Predictably, Megan turned on the waterworks and framed her relationship with Will as a harmless schoolboy crush that got way out of hand. While she manged to wrap her boyfriend Daniel round her little finger, Leanne is convinced that Sam was right about Megan and won’t rest until she’s locked up behind bars.

The only problem? No evidence. Megan’s been careful not to get caught. When Sam put camera in her flat to catch her out, she even staged a conversation with Will that deliberated made their relationship seem like a one-sided teenage infatuation. There’s been no dirt to incriminate this arch manipulator… until tonight’s episode of Coronation Street.

With Megan and Will sticking to the same story, Cobbles Copper Kit Green’s (Jacob Roberts) investigations hit a dead end, much to Ben’s frustration. Try as he might, Will is still insisting that Megan never behaved inappropriately and refuses to co-operate during the police interview. Megan plays the victim, with her lawyer Adam Barlow (Sam Robertson) challenging Kit to provide a shred of evidence that his client is an abuser.

Meddling Maggie does some investigations of her own and manages to find a promising lead. Will broke up with Chloe, the girl he was dating in Hull, long before he booked a room in the Chariot Street hotel for his birthday. Therefore, it couldn’t have been Chloe hiding that bathroom… it must have been Megan!

Unfortunately, Ben and Eva are thwarted when they visit the Chariot Street Hotel only to be informed by Ronnie Bailey (Vinta Morgan) that the footage has sadly been automatically deleted. Back to square one…

Don’t miss a Soaps scoop! Add us as a Preferred Source

As a loyal Metro Soaps reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for stories. We have all the latest soaps news, spoilers, videos, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

Advertisement

However, Leanne has better luck.

After overhearing from Alya Nazir (Sair Khan) that Adam has taken on Megan as a client, Leanne is already in a foul mood. You don’t have to be Kit Green to figure that one out. Especially not when Megan arrives home to find a livid Leanne tipping all her worldly goods out onto the street. ‘Putting the rubbish out!’ Leanne snaps.

As Tim (Joe Duttine) and Sally Metcalfe (Sally Dynevor) walk by just in time to catch the show, the predator tries to protest her innocence. But Leanne isn’t buying it and warns her to get lost. ‘The only reason I’m not screaming the truth from a megaphone is to protect your victims!’

But Leanne soon changes her mind, when she storms into the Driscolls and reveals to Eva, Toyah, Ben and Ollie Driscoll (Raphael Akuwudike) that she found some pregnancy vitamins among Megan’s things. Ben wonders if she’s having a baby… prompting an awkward Eva to reveal that Megan had an abortion.

Incredulous, Ben can’t believe he’s hearing about this now. After all, that baby could have been his grandchild. But Eva insists she was only trying to protect him. Toyah guesses the baby must be gone by now, but Leanne suspects otherwise. Why keep pregnancy vitamins on your bedside table when you’ve already had the abortion?

Eva agrees. ‘If she has lied all the evidence we need is growing right there in her belly!’ She reasons.

Now they have the proof. Getting their hands on it might prove tricky…

MORE: Coronation Street fans heap praise on star for ‘superb’ performance as ‘deplorable’ Megan

MORE: The Driscolls reel as Will sticks up for abuser Megan in Coronation Street

MORE: Maggie explodes with rage in Coronation Street as Will refuses to take down Megan

Sarr’s first goal was created by some good work by Jorgen Strand Larsen, who battled under pressure to retain possession before flicking to Adam Wharton, who excellently teed up the opener with a pass that took a deflection before falling into the path of the Senegal international, who rounded Zlatan Alomerovic before applying the low finish.