Welsh health and education services are underperforming and worse than services across the border, a damning report from the influential Institute for Fiscal Studies warns. Both are “substantially poorer than before the Covid-19 pandemiic and poorer than in England”, the independent IFS says in a stark analysis published on Tuesday, March 10.

“Five years on from the height of the Covid pandemic, waiting lists for pre-planned NHS treatment are finally falling in Wales but remain far higher than pre-pandemic and have taken longer to start falling than in England,” the IFS report reads. “Meanwhile, A&E waiting times are, if anything, still rising.

“School absences remain 50% higher than in 2019, Welsh school pupils have seen their performance fall in internationally comparable tests, and the share of young people staying in education post-16 is lower now than 10 years ago.

“Overall, performance in both the health and education systems is substantially poorer than before the Covid-19 pandemic – and poorer than in England.” This “poor performance” is despite significant increases in spending, the IFS says in its 55-page report on Wales.

The IFS, a highly regarded and influential independent research institute, which is non-profit and non-political, calculates that health spending in Wales has risen by 17% per person in real terms since 2019–20, while spending per school pupil has increased by 14% in real terms.

“These increases are similar to or higher than those seen in England over the same period. And combined spending per person on health and schools, together, is higher than all English regions bar Greater London. A lack of funding therefore does not appear to be the key driver of current under-performance relative to England,” the IFS said.

The think tank predicted the next Welsh Government will struggle to maintain, let alone improve, services. This is due to what the IFS called a slowdown in funding growth and the impact of recent budgeting decisions “including unrealistic health spending plans for 2026–27”.

If it were not for top-ups to funding from the UK government in the 2026 Spring Statement, the next Welsh Government would highly likely have had to make in-year cuts to some services in an emergency post-election budget in order to boost health and social care spending, the report warns.

These are among the key findings of the second Welsh election briefing from the IFS, funded by the Nuffield Foundation. The briefing considers how spending on public services in Wales has evolved over time and compares with England. It looks at what it says are key performance metrics for health and education and at the outlook for public service spending – which will affect public service performance in the years to come.

Max Warner, a senior research economist at the IFS and a co-author of the report, said: “The last year has seen some welcome improvement in waiting times for planned hospital treatments, with the median waiting time falling from 23.5 weeks at the start of 2025 to 19 weeks by December. But this is still almost twice as long as pre-pandemic and 40% longer than comparable waiting times in England.

“A big surge in outpatient appointments – up 25% since 2019 – doesn’t seem to have delivered the improvements in waiting times one would hope. Working out why, and more generally boosting hospital productivity, will be key to delivering a more significant recovery in NHS performance.”

Darcey Snape, a research economist at the IFS and another co-author of the report, said: “On a range of metrics – school absence, results in international PISA tests and post-16 participation rates – the Welsh education system is under-performing.

“The fall in the share of young Welsh people remaining in full-time education post-16 is stark. If this reflects young people moving into training and employment with high long-term returns, this trend may not necessarily be a bad thing. However, at face value this trend is a cause for concern and needs to be better understood.”

David Phillips, head of devolved and local government finance at the IFS and another co-author of the report, said the causes of the poor performance of Welsh public services are not fully clear. “Funding levels seem unlikely to be a major factor given spending in Wales is higher than comparable areas of England and has, if anything, grown slightly faster since before the pandemic,” he said.

“High levels of deprivation can likely only explain part of it too – educational performance, for instance, is lower across the income distribution. Instead, policies and the way services are delivered are likely to play a role.

“Average hospital stays are 40% longer in Wales than England, reducing the number of patients that can be admitted and treated. For schools, accountability for poor performance may be weaker – with less data available to both teachers and parents.”

He said that more work is needed to “diagnose the various reasons for and potential solutions to Wales’ poor public service performance” and that doing this could be one of the defining successes – or failures – of the next Welsh Government.

Responding to the report a Welsh Government spokesperson said: “We continue to work closely with health boards and local authorities to improve frontline public services at a time when costs are rising. The NHS waiting list has fallen and the longest waits are coming down. We have set clear expectations for all health boards to reduce emergency department long stays and complete ambulance handovers within 45 minutes.

“Our education system is moving in the right direction thanks to the additional support we are providing to schools and the hard work of school staff. Our latest GCSE and A level results show improvements in attainment since 2024. For younger learners we are seeing progress within reading and numeracy in personalised assessments.”

Laura Doel, national secretary at the National Association of Headteachers Cymru, said: “School leaders in Wales are working hard to deliver for their pupils amid all manner of challenges – from funding shortfalls and supporting children with additional learning needs (ALN), to issues outside school which can affect attendance and attainment.”

She also questioned the use of PISA data of attainment by 15-year-olds to judge the whole system. “While the PISA analysis can be useful, we should not over-interpret these results and rely on simplistic comparisons which may not capture the richness of children’s learning or the different stages of education policy development in different countries.

“School leaders will be particularly interested to understand where the increased spending on education identified by the IFS has gone – because it has not reached the frontline. More investment is desperately needed to support severely stretched school budgets, as well as in vital health and social care services which can be so important in supporting families and helping ensure children attend school and thrive.”

The Welsh Conservatives said the IFS analysis confirmed what the party had been saying for years. “Despite Wales receiving higher levels of funding per person than England, health and education outcomes in Wales continue to lag behind the rest of the UK. The report suggests that the issue is not simply funding levels, but policy decisions and the way services are delivered by the Welsh Government.