Great British Bake Off judge Prue Leith revealed she’s “not very steady” on her “pins” any more, and noted that this was a factor in why she called it a day on Bake Off

Advertisement

Prue Leith has revealed the real reason behind her decision to step down from Bake Off as she admitted that one particular scene could have proved “humiliating beyond belief”. A culinary icon who has sat as judge on The Great British Bake Off since 2017, Prue announced last month that she would be stepping away from the programme after nine years.

At 86-years-old, Prue has enjoyed a career not only as a presenter, but also as a restaurateur, novelist, and cookery writer, and has said she wants “more time to do stuff”, noting that she’s “getting on a bit.”

In a fresh admission about her age, Prue has acknowledged that she’s “not very steady” on her “pins” anymore. Indeed, she highlighted a particular scene on the Channel 4 programme that could have been “humiliating beyond belief” and how it might have resulted in disaster.

Speaking to The Shift podcast (March 10), Prue described how this realisation occurred when she and fellow Bake Off stars Paul Hollywood and Noel Fielding were asked to “dance round this field”.

Prue explained that the field in question was “very hummocky”, and, whilst her Bake Off colleagues were able to manage it, she feared going “A over T” or “a*se over t*t.”

She said: “They wanted us to dance round this field. And it was a very hummocky, uneven field, which, of course, Noel could really leap over brilliantly and Paul perfectly good.

“But I suddenly realised, ‘I’m going to go A over T, you know, this is going to be humiliating beyond belief”. So I said, ‘I don’t want to do it’, and they understood – they were fine.

“And that was the first time I had to say, ‘I can’t do that’.”

This wouldn’t be the first instance of Prue alluding to this event in recent times; earlier this month, reports surfaced that Prue once “declined” a request from Bake Off bosses due to concerns about a certain “danger”.

In her latest book, Being Old…and Learning to Love It! , she detailed how she was once asked to “dance in a rough and lumpy field”, suggesting that the aforementioned incident has remained with her.

She penned: “The danger of this old lady tripping and falling was far greater than the brief pleasure I’d get from whirling around with Noel (Fielding) or Paul (Hollywood), and I declined.

“But when, last year, we were filming the New Year’s episode, we had a steel band in the famous tent. Alison Hammond, exuberant as always, was the first up and dancing, and soon I couldn’t resist and joined her.

“While writing this, I’ve not yet seen the resulting film and can only hope the editors have been kind and cut me out if I look the idiot I probably am. But the point is, even if they don’t, I really don’t care.”

It follows letters being sent out to certain claimants.

Millions of people on older benefits have gradually been moved over to the new Universal Credit benefit.

The process to move people over from these previous payments, known as ‘legacy benefits’, has been going on in stages for several years.

Children deserve to understand decisions that affect their lives

The government has published a guide for children aged 5 to 11 to explain the ‘Our Children, Our Future: Tackling Child Poverty’ strategyhttps://t.co/RG3w6y0mjX pic.twitter.com/olF3dGh0Wv

— Department for Work and Pensions (@DWPgovuk) March 13, 2026

The DWP previously confirmed that some benefits would end at the end of March 2026 as part of the project.

Six legacy benefits changing:

• Income-based Jobseekers Allowance
• Income-related Employment and Support Allowance
• Income Support
• Housing Benefit
• Child Tax Credit
• Working Tax Credit

The DWP was asked for an update on the project and who is left to move over to Universal Credit.

A DWP spokesperson told The Mirror: “The department has been migrating people from legacy benefits to Universal Credit since 2022 and most have now moved.

“Help is at hand for those making the move to Universal Credit, including our dedicated helpline, guidance on gov.uk, and the Citizens Advice’s free and independent Help to Claim service.

“All legacy benefit claimants who have received a migration notice continue to receive their legacy benefit up until the point they move over to Universal Credit, or the deadline passes.”

These migration notices are letters that go out inviting you to apply for Universal Credit.

Millions to see DWP benefits and pensions change in 2026

Millions of households relying on UK benefits are set to see their payments change in the 2026/27 financial year, with increases across pensions, disability support and Universal Credit, but some major limits will remain frozen.

The updated figures reveal how much people could receive each week or month depending on their circumstances, with some of the biggest changes affecting pensioners, carers and people on disability benefits.

Recommended reading:

Millions to see DWP benefits and pensions change in 2026

‘They’re my lifeline’ stroke survivor fears losing dogs as pet surrender crisis hits

Extra 53,000 disabled households to get help with sky-high water bills

The full new State Pension will increase from £230.25 to £241.30 a week in 2026/27.

That’s an increase of more than £11 a week, or roughly £572 a year, for those receiving the full amount.

For those on the basic State Pension, the rate rises from £176.45 to £184.90 a week.

Asked whether ministers would consider scrapping the planned tax rise in the wake of the energy price rises, Mr Miliband told the BBC: “Let me answer that by saying this, which is, I’ll be candid with you, we don’t know how long this conflict is going to go on and therefore, with five months to go until September, we will have to see where we are, obviously.”

If a general election were held today, many British voters would notice something that has been quietly changing for years. They have more choice on the ballot than they used to. The dominance of Labour and the Conservatives is being eroded by multi-party politics. The recent Gorton and Denton byelection clearly showed that the Green Party and Reform UK are emerging as serious forces. Elsewhere, Your Party is preparing to enter the race.

These changes have already fuelled renewed calls for electoral reform, particularly for the introduction of proportional representation. But the significance of a shift towards multiparty politics goes beyond the rules of the electoral system. It also has the potential to change the democratic role of political competition in the UK.

In any healthy democracy, it is essential that diverging opinions and different views about society and public policy can compete openly. Political parties express and organise this democratic competition. Yet in a two-party system, it is limited to a select few. Multiparty competition offers the possibility of a more open and inclusive political arena.

Many people in the UK today feel disconnected from politics. Trust in elected representatives is low, and it is not uncommon to hear that politicians are “all the same” or “only in it for themselves”. These sentiments are often treated as symptoms of the current political moment. But the sense of distance between “ordinary citizens” and professional politics has deeper roots. In fact, it is closely tied to a political system dominated by two parties.

Democratic theorists who prefer two-party systems typically argue that democratic politics works best if professional politicians compete over ideas and policies. Ordinary citizens only participate at the ballot box. In other words, the job of shaping political visions is left to the experts; the rest of us should stick to voting.

For them, democracy does not depend on ordinary citizens actively shaping policy. Instead, it is sufficient for political parties to compete for power. It is this competition that ensures that governments respond to voters’ preferences. After all, parties will only be elected (and governments re-elected) if their policies appeal to voters. In a system dominated by two parties, the theory goes, citizens need only vote, while parties adjust their policies to win elections.

But the widespread dissatisfaction with both Labour and the Conservatives, along with the rise of other political parties, shows that theory does not always match reality. Clearly, two-party competition does not automatically produce the kind of policies voters want.

Options are emerging

The fact that parties beyond Labour and the Conservatives now have a chance of winning power could shake things up. A wider range of parties does not just give voters more choices; it can also create new opportunities for people to get involved in politics themselves. New or growing parties have reason to set themselves apart from established elites. One way to do that is to be, or at least appear to be, more accessible and responsive to ordinary citizens. That might include inviting greater participation from ordinary people.

Your Party has clearly understood there is opportunity here and is experimenting with a collective leadership model and a system of random selection to attend its party conference.

Of course, there is no guarantee that new parties will enhance participation and replace old elites. From the start, the democratic experimentation of Your Party has been overshadowed by the tension between its founders, Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, who made their political names in the Labour Party. Even more strikingly, recent defections of prominent Conservative politicians to Reform cast doubt on the party’s proclaimed anti-establishment orientation.

À lire aussi :
Survey shows support for electoral reform now at 60% – so could it happen?

Given the UK’s first-past-the-post system, it is also unclear whether today’s multiparty competition will last or whether politics will eventually settle back into a battle between two major parties.

The rise of new parties alone does not guarantee a more democratic Britain. Still, the current political moment holds hope: it points to the possibility of a democratic future in which the competition between different political visions for Britain offers more options to the public.

Hundreds of thousands of women are “missing out” on having children, partly because of a “delay” in young men maturing into adulthood, a report has claimed.

The Centre for Social Justice, a think tank founded by Tory MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith, said around three million women aged between 16 and 45 are projected not to have children under current trends. If birth trends were the same as their grandparents’ generation, then around 2.4 million women would not have children. It means around 600,000 fewer women are having children, it said.

The paper, published on Sunday, cited a range of reasons for falling birth rates, including declining marriage rates and the later average age at which women are having children. But the report also suggests “male employment and education trends may play a role in falling birth rates”.

The report said that, “in the past”, a 24-year-old man would have likely been married, had a child and been working for a decade, but now men are only leaving home at the age of 25 on average.

One way to tackle the UK’s falling birth rate is to encourage marriage at a younger age and for men to “enter adulthood” earlier than 25, the report said.

open image in gallery

The Centre for Social Justice was founded in 2003 by Sir Iain, a former minister for Work and Pensions under the Conservative government. The CSJ’s report is also supported by Miriam Cates, a former Tory MP who has been outspoken in her concern about declining fertility rates in Britain and has called for policies to promote marriage and having children.

Elsewhere, the report recommends that the government explore so-called “pro-natal” policies which incentivise people to start or grow families, such as tax cuts and conditions for benefit changes.

But it said creating financial incentives to have children without addressing low marriage rates is “putting the cart before the horse”, citing an analysis published in the Financial Times.

The FT article included in the report does not specify marriage but does link fertility to falling relationship rates. It said: “From the US, Finland and South Korea to Turkey, Tunisia and Thailand, falling birth rates are increasingly downstream of a relationship recession among adults. Baby bonuses put the cart before the horse when a growing share of people are without a partner. Even in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, similar trends may be underway.”

The think tank’s suggestion to incentivise marriage through tax cuts comes after Reform UK MP Matt Goodwin was criticised for saying in a blog that people who don’t have children should be taxed extra as punishment.

The think tank said falling fertility rates could also impact the ratio needed between pensioners and working-age people, and said that to maintain the ratio, the state pension age would need to rise to 75 by 2039.

In a report published in January 2025, the UK’s Office for National Statistics said total fertility rates had fallen between 2012 and 2023.

open image in gallery

It also said fertility rates for women in all age groups under 30 years are projected to decrease, while age groups over 30 years are projected to increase between 2022 and 2047.

The ONS asked a panel of experts to outline various factors that could impact future fertility rates and found:

Staring at the text message I’d composed on my phone, I felt both ecstasy and fear.

It read: ‘I’m a woman, always have been. From this day on, I will live as a woman.’ 

Simple and direct. At the age of 33 in 2019, I was done with wasting time. 

Taking a deep breath, I hit send. Instantly, all my friends and family found out at the same time that I was trans. 

The responses were very telling. Especially from cisgender male friends. 

Before I came out as trans, l felt trapped in my male body prison.  

I’ve always known I was female. As a child I felt awful wearing boy clothes – it never felt right – and playing games with the boys was awful, too. I didn’t want to rough play – I wanted to brush dolls’ hair with the other girls and play hop scotch.  

In my teens I completely retreated into myself. I felt anxious and had no lust for life.

As an adult, I struggled to form meaningful relationships. I had a few close friends but I always felt hollow inside.

One day when walking through a park, a group of teens circled me on their bikes. They started throwing stones at me and shouting homophobic slurs.  

Following that incident, I felt like I was drowning, suffocating in my body. I simply could not live as a man a moment longer.

I couldn’t see a way out other than ending my life. The pain was all too much.

But just as I was about to do it, a soft voice cried, ‘Don’t let them win!’

I turned around to see an elderly woman. ‘They’re not worth it. Trust me dear, no matter who they are, they are not worth more than you,’ she continued. 

I collapsed to the ground and sobbed. It felt strangely good.

The woman helped me up, gave me a hug and asked if I was going to be OK. I nodded and started to walk back home.

If I saw her again, I would give her such a big hug. She saved my life that day. 

I wanted to live. Not as a shell of a person, but as my true uncensored self. That’s when I decided to send the text message to all of my family and friends. 

The response to my coming out ranged from affirming, to lukewarm, to outright hostile. 

A family member even disowned me and said to my mum while I was in earshot: ‘How could it do this to our family?’

Keep up with the conversations shaping Britain

Hi, I’m Ross McCafferty, Metro’s acting first-person and opinion editor.

Here at Metro, we’re passionate about giving a platform to unheard voices. You can read more real-life stories like this one with our News Updates newsletter.

From championing marginalised communities to tackling taboo topics, we help people from all walks of life tell stories that inspire, educate and spark change.

Advertisement

Sign up now and get the top headlines served straight to your inbox, every day.

I was referred to as an ‘it’.

My female friends reacted best. They were eager to help me buy clothes and make-up, which was lovely, even if it did make me feel like a fancy new accessory for them to show off with.  

My male friends, on the other hand, became incredibly uncomfortable around me. 

One close male friend, Kyle*, in particular said some very telling things. 

He didn’t reply to my text. However when we met for a drink a couple of days later Kyle blurted out: ‘I thought you just batted for the other team?’ 

In his estimation, I couldn’t possibly be a woman. I was just a campy gay man. I didn’t even know how to properly explain it myself to him. 

But his offensive remarks didn’t stop there. He also asked when I was ‘getting the op’, meaning when was I having gender-affirming care. I remember just saying, ‘I don’t know but I’m definitely a woman’.

I felt flustered and uncomfortable. It was beginning to upset me.  

He also said, ‘We can’t have the banter with you anymore’; banter, of course, being that not-so-thinly-veiled casual sexist commentary men often have at the pub. I took this to mean ‘We can’t chat about women around you now’. Not that I was bothered – that kind of chat always made me feel uncomfortable. 

And finally: ‘Does this mean you’re no longer one of the lads?’ – which felt like Kyle was throwing me out of the boys club.

I burst into tears. The pain of rejection was overwhelming. I made an excuse that I had to leave to get up early. When I got home I cried myself to sleep.  

I stopped talking to him for a couple of weeks. 

Meanwhile, other male friends didn’t invite me out for drinks as often and were more abrupt in conversations with me. They would say hi and then leave a long and very awkward silence – like they didn’t know what to say.

Once, I was walking through a park with an old friend and he got all embarrassed when a woman he knew passed us; he was worried that she thought I was his girlfriend.  

As a result of all this, I spent most of my time hanging out with other women. But gradually, they began to drift away too.

They’d had this idea of me that suddenly shattered. No longer was I the shy, meek, and chronically anxious man. I was quickly becoming a strong, fierce, and courageous woman. 

I never felt truly accepted in their company, which led me to become increasingly uncomfortable.

Then something remarkable happened. I started to meet and become friends with other trans people at support groups, meetups, and gigs. 

Before long, my entire friend circle was trans people. And in many ways, it’s just easier – you don’t have to explain anything to them, they just get it. 

You don’t have to exhaust yourself explaining what trans is to them. There is no weirdness around your transition because you share a similar lived experience.  

My life now is great. I have loads of supportive trans people in my life and I could not be happier.  

I do sometimes miss my cisgender male friends. The silliness and nights out together were a lot of fun.

But I don’t regret sending that mass text message – even if it meant I had some uncomfortable conversations. Now I know who my real friends are.

Name has been changed

Originally published October 12th, 2025

Do you have a story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing Ross.Mccafferty@metro.co.uk. 

Share your views in the comments below.

MORE: I wanted to enjoy being a new mum – then I was diagnosed with cancer

MORE: My brother discovered his long-lost daughter – then cut me off

MORE: I miscarried on Mother’s day – one woman’s question devastated me

F1’s bosses are caught in the middle of this debate, recognising the superficial appeal of the back-and-forth racing, but concerned about what the new cars are doing to the sport they grew up loving because they were attracted by its essence as the ultimate test of driver and machine.

Andrea Stella, team principal of world champions McLaren, said: “In qualifying, there’s some aspects of driving that could be counterintuitive.

“Like, occasionally there are comments from our drivers that once they make a mistake, actually save some energy, you go faster overall in a sector, because the energy you saved with the delay on the throttle because you had a problem is going to reward you at the end of the straight.”

Mercedes F1 team principal Toto Wolff said: “From an entertainment perspective, I believe that what we’ve seen today between Ferrari and McLaren was good racing. Many overtakes.

“We were all part of Formula 1 where there was no overtake, literally. Sometimes we’re too nostalgic about the good old years.

“But I think the product is good in itself. We saw quite some racing in the midfield also. And that is, I think, the positive.

“Now, from a driver’s standpoint, when it comes to the qualifying lap, that is different. Clearly, lift and coast in the qualifying, I’m sure for someone like Max, who is a full-attack guy, it’s difficult to cope and digest.

“Qualifying flat-out would be nice. But when you look at the fans and the excitement that is there, live, the cheering when there’s overtakes and also on social media, the younger fans, the vast majority, through all the demographics, like the sport at the moment.

“So, yes, we can always look at how we’re improving it. But at the moment, all the indicators and all the data say people love it. And I spoke with Stefano (Domenicali, the F1 president). He says that, too.”

The cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabia Grands Prix gives the sport a little more breathing space to consider all this.

There is a meeting of team bosses with F1 and governing body the FIA this week, and another race in Japan in two weeks’ time before a five-week break before the next Grand Prix in Miami at the beginning of May.

A number of ideas to reduce the degree to which the purity of the driving experience has been polluted are already in the mix, such as removing a lower limit for energy recovery currently in force in a certain phase of the straights. And others may yet emerge.

Stella says: “Do we want to be faithful to the DNA of racing in a traditional sense? Do we accept that this counterintuitive situation belongs to the business or not? This is a high-level philosophical question.”