Katie Price has set the record straight on her relationship with daughter Princess Andre, after making an unexpected appearance on her ITV2 show, The Princess Diaries

Katie Price finally made her debut on 18-year-old daughter Princess Andre‘s show via a FaceTime call, after previously claiming she’d been “banned” from appearing on the ITV2 series. The 47-year-old former glamour model has now revealed how she truly feels about the situation in a candid chat with her sister Sophie on their podcast, The Katie Price Show.

Sophie began the discussion by saying: “You actually made an appearance on FaceTime! How did it feel?” Sensing a sarcastic tone in her sister’s voice, Katie, who recently got married for the fourth time to Dubai-based businessman Lee Andrews, replied: “I love your sarcasm, Soph! Yes I made an appearance on the show, wahey!

“Look, it’s Princess’ show and I think, because of the first show, there was a lot of stick because it was pretty obvious I wasn’t in it,” to which Sophie replied: “I think the first show went down like a tonne of lead!”

Katie agreed: “Literally, yes. Because whether people love it or not, like it or hate it, I am Princess’ mum and you can’t keep me away or keep the fact that I am associated to Princess, because I am her mother. And they use my name, I’m not saying ‘they’, but my name is always used against her show to create headlines.”

The mum-of-five, who shares Princess and her older brother Junior, 20, with ex-husband Peter Andre, 53, insisted that although she has mixed feelings about the show, “there’s no scandal” behind her not being very present on the programme.

She told listeners: “Now, I don’t understand, there’s no scandal, I speak to Princess every day, she lives at mine and Pete’s.”

However, the reality star did admit that she “wished she was there” when Junior and Princess were filmed taking their half-brother Harvey Price, who suffers from a rare genetic condition known as Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), out for the day.

Katie shared: “I wish I was there with Harvey on that, because I always do everything with Harvey, and it was nice for Junior and Princess to take Harvey out on his own.

“It was the first time they took him out, so when I was watching that bit, I was interested to see how Harvey would behave, and it’s weird because where Harvey is so used to me, he’s more bantery. So he must have been on the fritz a little bit,” the star said, before further explaining that her son seemed a bit more reserved on camera.

Katie didn’t rule out another cameo on the series, even suggesting that she and Princess’ dad Pete could be appearing more frequently on the reality show in the future.

She remarked: “Look, good for Princess doing her show. I don’t care what anyone says, and it’s my daughter at the end of the day and I support her, always will.

“Now, if she does her third show, I reckon me and Pete might make an appearance, I’m not saying together, but separate. It is her show anyway, but it would be nice for people to see mother and daughter stuff because me and Princess do stuff all the time. Sometimes I just feel like I’m kept out…”

“Well, we know you are,” Sophie chimed in, prompting Katie to clarify that “in real life, it’s not like that”, as she spends a lot of time with Princess normally, but the ITV2 show is filmed at her dad’s house.

Despite her sadness over aspects of the series, Katie was keen for fans to know that she’s “at peace with everything” and wants her eldest children to focus on their careers, rather than negative rumours about her and Pete.

Katie’s remarks come after she and ex Pete jointly announced in February that after a war of words spanning several years following their 2009 split, the two have “both legally and personally” confirmed they “will not speak negatively about the other going forward”.

The Friends of New Earswick Swimming Pool, a volunteer-led charity, is seeking £500,000 to replace the much-loved facility’s roofs, which need to be due to persistent leaks and structural deterioration.

The campaign, termed “Buy a Tile,” invites supporters to purchase virtual tiles in bronze, silver, or gold tiers, for £20, £50, and £100, respectively.

RECOMMENDED READING:

The money will be used specifically for replacing the pool and changing room roofs and a series of sustainability upgrades, including new insulation, solar panels, and battery storage, to lower energy costs significantly.

Planning permissions and redevelopment plans are already in place with contributors and fundraising activities having raised £205,000 towards the target.

A spokesperson said that the fundraising initiative reflects the community’s part in securing the pool’s future for decades to come.

New Earswick Pool today (Image: Provided)

They added: Many people in York learned to swim there, and countless people rely on it for exercise, rehabilitation, and social connection.

“The pool is also a vital resource for disabled swimmers, offering warm water, accessible sessions, and a welcoming environment.”

To buy a tile, go towww.friendsofnewearswickpool.co.uk/buy-a-tile or you can send a cheque to FoNESP c/o 3 Meadowfields Drive, York YO31 9HW (include your email address or phone number).

Value is definitely one of Giffgaff’s strong suits, and although it doesn’t score as highly with customers as Tesco Mobile or Lebara, there’s little to complain about here. Giffgaff’s cheapest tariff starts from £6 a month, and that includes 2GB of data with unlimited minutes and texts. However, it’s worth pointing out that Lebara’s cheapest deal is £1.50 per month cheaper and offers more data.

If you’re more data hungry or you’ve got Spotify/TikTok/YouTube-gobbling teenagers to feed, the 25GB and Unlimited tariffs are also reasonably priced, if once again undercut by Lebara.

Giffgaff does offer deals that include phones as well as SIM-only tariffs, and it’s worth noting that the company also sells refurbished phones, which are much cheaper than buying new. If your kids insist on having iPhones, it’s one of the cheapest ways to pick them up, provided they aren’t screaming for the latest model.

Speed

Score: 4.5/5

Given that it’s owned by Virgin Media O2, it will come as no surprise that Giffgaff runs on the O2 network. That’s by no means a bad thing, with overall winner Tesco Mobile doing the same, and customers seem to have few complaints about the network’s performance.

A healthy 89 per cent of the Giffgaff customers we surveyed said they were happy with the speeds on offer from the network, which is why it shares our speed award with Tesco Mobile.

O2’s 5G outdoor coverage is pegged at between 70-76 per cent by regulator Ofcom, which isn’t as comprehensive as that of EE (86-89 per cent).

Reliability

Score: 5/5

Giffgaff customers are highly satisfied with the robustness of the network. Overall, 95 per cent of those surveyed said they were happy with reliability, while 88 per cent said they were satisfied with the consistency of data speeds and the latency (or responsiveness) of the network.

That means Giffgaff is the joint winner of our most reliable mobile network award, alongside Tesco Mobile and Lebara.

Customer service

Score: 3.5/5

If there’s a slight downside to Giffgaff’s offering, it’s customer service. As we mentioned previously, Giffgaff puts a lot of emphasis on community support, with customers helping other customers through the firm’s online forums. But there are some issues (such as billing) that only a company representative can sort and that may be where Giffgaff falls short.

For example, only 66 per cent of Giffgaff customers were happy with the ease with which they can reach the customer support team, a distinctly mid-table score. When it comes to the quality of support, only 72 per cent of Giffgaff customers said they were happy.

Roaming

Score: 4/5

Like many other networks, Giffgaff does include EU roaming in its plans, but there are limits. For example, even if you’re on an unlimited plan or, say, 25GB per month, the EU roaming data allowance is capped at 5GB. That should still be enough for a holiday, but others, such as Lebara, let you use your full data allowance while you’re in the EU.

Giffgaff customers seem reasonably happy with the situation, though, with 77 per cent saying they were happy with the roaming value.

Pope Leo XIV has called on the world’s mega-rich to use their wealth to help those in need during a visit to Monaco.

Leo flew in on a helicopter for the one-day trip to the world’s second-smallest state, the first papal visit there in nearly 500 years.

The Vatican said he wanted to show that small countries can make an outsized impact on the world stage.

The glitzy enclave on the French Riviera is known as a haven for billionaires and their luxury yachts

Speaking in French shortly after his arrival, Leo condemned what he termed the widening ‘chasms between the poor and the rich’.

Leo, the first American-born pope, was greeted at the Monaco heliport by Prince Albert and Princess Charlene.

At the palace, members of the royal family stood in the courtyard waiting for Leo, the women dressed in black and with lace head coverings.

Charlene wore white — a protocol privilege granted by the Vatican to Catholic royal sovereigns when meeting popes, known in diplomatic terms as ‘le privilège du blanc’.

In his opening greeting from the palace balcony, Leo urged Monaco – which has the highest concentration of billionaires per capita in the world – to use its wealth, influence and ‘gift of smallness’ for good.

It was important, he said, ‘especially at a historical moment when the display of power and the logic of oppression are harming the world and jeopardising peace’.

Later in the cathedral, Leo urged Monaco’s Catholics to spread their faith ‘so that the life of every man and woman may be defended and promoted from conception until natural death’.

Such terms are used by the Vatican to refer to Catholic teaching opposing abortion and euthanasia.

Monaco is one of the few European countries where Catholicism is the official state religion.

A coastal playground for the rich and famous, Monaco is also renowned as much for its tax-friendly incentives and Formula 1 Grand Prix as its glamorous royal family.

The principality’s casinos – four – are only narrowly outnumbered by its five churches.

Leo’s events in Monaco were marked by all the usual protocol and pomp of a papal tour abroad.

Crowds, however, were relatively thin.

Few lined the streets as he toured the 0.8 square mile country in an open-air popemobile.

Leo was elected in May to succeed the late Pope Francis as head of the 1.4-billion-member Church.

His visit to Monaco is only his second outside Italy, but opens what is expected to be a busy year of travel.

Leo, 70, is relatively young and in good health for a pope.

He will undertake an ambitious, four-country tour of Africa in April, and is also due to make a week-long visit to Spain in June.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

It was nice to see how much respect was paid to those who fought in World War Two

Cambridgeshire has a strong RAF history, with many former bases now seeing new lives as museums or housing developments. At a former RAF base, a restaurant pays homage to those who once served at the base.

Recently, I visited Alconbury Weald, a 10-year-old housing development where new homes are still being built. Although it only had one shop, there was an interesting restaurant I wanted to check out. This was The Watch Office.

What made it stand out is it served as an operational hub for RAF Alconbury during the Second World War. The restaurant resembled a bunker, and its current camouflage decoration harks back to the days when the building was used by the military.

As I stepped inside, I was faced with more decoration inspired by the war and the RAF, with different planes painted on the walls, alongside their names. It was endearing to see the respects paid to the former RAF base, with the history of the area part of the fabric of its incarnation today.

It was when I stepped into the main restaurant I realised how much the RAF was respected. On the back wall of the building was a mural painted with two soldiers looking to the skies as planes fly above them. I sat down and scoured the menu.

Advertisement

For a small place, I was impressed with the large selection they had on offer. Seeking a warm drink, I firstly ordered a hot chocolate topped with marshmallows and cream.

When my drink arrived, it was a welcome sight. It was smothered in cream and covered in marshmallows, with a nice surprise of cinnamon sprinkled on top.

As I sipped, the cream melted in my mouth, while the marshmallows were soft and squishy. Once I got through the heap of cream, the hot chocolate itself had a creamy and silky taste.

Advertisement

For food, I opted for the breakfast sandwich. This contained a sausage patty, crispy bacon, and chimichurri fried egg, all in a garlic buttered bun. It was served with two hash browns.

I was very impressed with the hash browns, due to their crispiness and large size. However, they were very salty.

I took one big bite of my burger to get all of the toppings in, as there was a lot packed into this bun. As I bit in, the crispy bacon stood out. The rashers gave an indulgent savoury taste. The sausage patty was flat and grilled to a nice standard.

Despite being so much packed into the bun, the sandwich was easy to eat and not as messy as I thought. The only thing was there was a lot of salt on all of the toppings – I would have liked to be able to season it to my taste.

Overall, I admired the RAF-inspired decor at The Watch Office, and found it sweet that so much respect was paid to the history of the place.

All of our food reviews are paid for by the writer. The establishments do not know we will be reviewing their food, allowing us to make fair judgements on each place.

Yemen’s Houthi rebels have joined the conflict in the Middle East, launching a missile bound for Israel.

It marks the first time the country has involved itself in the war, which began one month ago today after the US and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury.

Strikes have covered the region ever since, with Trump targeting Tehran while Iran launches strikes at US military bases.

Now, a military spokesman for the Houthis said they are prepared to join the war on behalf of Iran after the US and Israel targeted power and nuclear sites.

This is not the first time they have involved themselves in conflict in the region.

Two years ago the breakaway faction repeatedly launched drones and missiles against commercial vessels, claiming to be attacking Israeli ships in support of Palestine.

It accused the West of ‘blatant aggression’ and after airstrikes on Friday hit dozens of targets, vowing to respond with ‘punishment or retaliation’.

Britain has walked a tightrope over Yemen’s civil war for the last decade – keep reading to find out who’s involved and why some fear the situation could escalate into a full-blown war in the region.

Who are the Houthi rebels?

The Houthi movement is a political and military group that follows a minority strand of Islam called Zaydism, and draws its name from an ancient Arab tribe from northern Yemen called the Houthis.

Following rising instability in the wake of the Arab Spring, they seized control of the Yemeni capital of Sana’a in 2014, sparking one of the deadliest civil wars in recent history – which is still ongoing today.

Yemen’s official government, recognised by most countries including the UK, is backed by a Saudi-led coalition which Britain has supplied with weapons.

Both sides are widely believed to have carried out war crimes and atrocities against civilians, overseeing some of the worst humanitarian conditions in the world.

The Houthis are currently in control over almost all of northern Yemen, although much of the country has been devastated, with a death toll of over 150,000.

Have the Houthis been involved in conflict before?

Houthi forces launched dozens of drone and missile strikes on commercial vessels two years ago following the Israel-Hamas war on October 7.

The faction’s goal was ‘prevent Israeli ships from navigating the Arab and Red Seas in support of the oppressed Palestinian people’.

Follow Metro on WhatsApp to be the first to get all the latest news

Metro’s on Whatsapp! Join our community for breaking news and juicy stories.

Advertisement

In reality, though, almost all the targets were international trading ships – some making port in Israel, many simply passing through to other parts of the world.

One of the first incidents – when the Houthis hijacked what they claimed was an Israeli cargo ship in November – actually involved a British-owned ship run by a Japanese firm and staffed by crew from all around the world.

More recently, a Houthi spokesperson said any ship destined for Israel is a ‘legitimate target’. The UN’s shipping watchdog has since confirmed that the Houthis are continuing to attack ships with no links to Israel whatsoever.

Who supports the Houthis?

Yemen’s Houthis are backed by Iran, which began increasing its aid to the group in 2014 as the civil war broke out.

Iran’s theocratic government follows the Shia branch of Islam, of which the Houthi’s Zaydist belief system is a strand.

Iran has given the militants training and an array of sophisticated weapons and military technology, with the alleged help of Lebanon’s Hezbollah terrorist group.

The West has accused Iran of involvement in the Red Sea attacks two years ago and ordering the Houthis and other Middle Eastern militias to carry out their attacks on Israel, which Iran denies.

The UN Panel of Experts on Yemen previously found that Iran has ‘failed to take the necessary measures to prevent the direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer’ of various ballistic missiles that the Houthis have deployed against all the vessels.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE: Houthis rebels in Yemen enter war with missile attack on Israel, injuring 12 US soldiers

MORE: FBI director’s emails and personal photos published by Iranian hackers

MORE: Iran warns Israel and US are ‘playing with fire’ after strikes on nuclear sites

Two other people involved in the crash were also taken to the hospital as a precaution after the incident on Friday.

A bus driver and three passengers were rushed to hospital after horror crash in Ayrshire. Emergency crews raced to the scene at the junction between the A77 and B7034 near Minishant at around 5.15pm on Friday March 27.

The three-vehicle crash also involved a campervan and a car. The driver of the bus and three passengers were taken to hospital but no information is available on their condition at this stage.

Two other people involved in the incident also attended hospital as a precaution. The A77 was closed in both directions after the crash and motorists were urged to avoid the area.

Police Scotland confirmed on Saturday morning the road has reopened. A spokesperson for the force said: “The A77 at the junction with the B7034 near Minishant, Ayr, has re-opened following a three-vehicle crash.

“The crash happened around 5.15pm on Friday, 27 March, and involved a bus, a car, and a campervan. The driver of the bus and three passengers were taken to hospital for treatment.

“Two further people have also attended hospital as a precaution. Enquiries are ongoing.”

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

Six months ago, Emily Forrester had no idea that behind her daughter Leni’s bright, infectious smile lay a life-changing battle.

The toddler showed no signs of illness – nothing to suggest anything was wrong. Yet hidden beneath that cheerful exterior was a devastating condition.

The first warning came when a close relative had a routine genetic test and discovered they carried the gene for Sanfilippo, a rare disorder that leads to childhood dementia.

Doctors reassured the family that it was highly unlikely Leni would be affected. Still, the test results were enough to prompt her parents to seek further genetic investigation for their daughter.

What followed was a heartbreaking shock. Just one week before her second birthday, Leni was diagnosed with Sanfilippo.

The genetic condition is caused by an enzyme deficiency that prevents the body from breaking down certain molecules, which leads to catastrophic brain damage. Children with the disease suffer loss of memory, speech, mobility, and premature death.

There is currently no cure and no approved treatment available in the UK.

Leni could be saved from this bleak and painful future if she receives critical treatment within the next six months, before she turns three.

“If she has to wait six months, that could mean she can no longer talk. If she waits 12 months, that could mean she loses the ability to walk,” Ms Forrester, said. “It is a race against time.”

Life-saving treatment for Leni and other children with the genetic disorder is out there; however, it is blocked by a lack of funding.

“Getting the treatment could completely change the trajectory of her life, and she could go on to live normally with no symptoms,” the devoted mother said.

“This condition is particularly cruel because children develop normally until around two or three years old. So you get a glimpse of what kind of person they would be life if all was normal. Then it gets ripped away from you in a 10-minute phone call where you get the most catastrophic diagnosis you can imagine.”

But a delay in treatment, or no treatment at all, will have a fatal outcome.

A clinical trial for a treatment is expected to begin in the United States later this year. Leni’s parents are calling for the government to help fund the research so UK patients can be included.

The treatment replaces the enzyme that children with Sanfilippo are missing by fitting a permanent port in their brains. The body is then flushed with the enzyme via this treatment weekly for the rest of her life, as the body cannot make the enzyme by itself.

The clinical trial for the treatment was previously run by Great Ormond Street Hospital in London for six years. It reached the final phases of trial with effective results, but it was then cut because of a lack of funding. Children on the trial who developed normally with the treatment went on to decline once the funding stopped.

Another option is a gene therapy treatment developed by UK-based Professor Brian Bigger. However, his research cannot reach clinical trials without significant funding.

The cost of funding the US clinical trial stands at £5.5 million. “For an individual, £5.5 million is a huge amount. But for a nation, it is not,” Ms Forrester said, as she called on the government to expand newborn screening to help detect rare genetic conditions earlier, and grant more funding to accelerate game-changing treatments.

Ms Forrester praised singerJesy Nelson for using her platform to raise significant awareness for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), which affects her twin daughters, Ocean Jade and Story Monroe, and meeting the health secretary, but said families without celebrity status struggle to get any response from senior politicians.

“Politicians should prioritise meeting families suffering with the genetic disorders, not only celebrities to get their screen time.”

“These children have been pushed to the side,” she added. “There is no support for the families, even though the impact of childhood dementia is the same as childhood cancer, there is a huge difference in research and funding.”

Bob Stevens, CEO of the MPS Society, a charity supporting people with Mucopolysaccharide Diseases, of which Sanfilippo is one, said he was promised a meeting with health secretary Wes Streeting last summer, but it was not upheld. Ms Forrester’s local MP, Laura Trott, has also requested a meeting with Mr Streeting, which has gone unanswered.

Mr Stevens said: “The UK currently screens for far fewer conditions than many comparable countries, meaning families are often diagnosed only after crucial time has been lost.

“There is no scientific reason that we cannot screen for many of these diseases, but we know it comes down to money.

“For conditions like MPS III, early diagnosis is essential as new therapies move closer to reality. If we treat early, then a far better outcome will be achieved for families.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “We are making sure patients with rare diseases, like Sanfilippo syndrome, get a definite diagnosis faster, while improving access to specialist care, treatment and drugs.

“At the same time, we are working hard to find new ways to slow down the progress of the dementia, speed up diagnosis and improve our understanding of the disease.”

Leni’s parents have set up a GoFundMe page to raise funds for Leni to access treatment and to raise awareness for Sanfilippo disease.

We have not seen him play competitive golf outdoors since the Open of July 2024, his only action a nine-shot cameo in this week’s TGL indoor simulator finals.

Of late, Woods’ primary influence has been off the course, chairing the PGA Tour’s Future Competitions Committee.

It is a relatively recent appointment, but for the best part of five years he has been at the forefront of shaping the tour’s response to the arrival of the breakaway LIV Golf circuit.

He was too busy to take America’s Ryder Cup captaincy last year and is currently weighing up whether to accept the job for the 2027 match at Adare Manor in Ireland.

But such roles, returning to action (he has registered for June’s US Senior Open) and indeed any public-facing activities have been upended in the way his Range Rover flipped on to its side on Friday afternoon.

Police officers are analysing skid marks on Jupiter Island’s 30mph South Beach Road to gauge the speed of the 82-time tour winner’s car while attempting his ill-fated overtake manoeuvre.

Prosecutors are looking to build their case on three charges: driving under influence (despite passing a breathalyser test for alcohol), refusing to give a urine sample and damage to property.

Regardless of whether he is able to play at the Masters, Woods was expected to be in Georgia for the unveiling of The Patch – a revamped public golf course he has worked on with the Augusta National club. He was also looking forward to Rory McIlroy’s champion’s dinner on the Tuesday night.

Instead, talk shows across America and beyond are into overdrive on a far less wholesome agenda, speculating about the turbulent life of this elite sportsman – someone who has enjoyed and endured more extreme highs and lows than pretty much any other.

Trying to play the Masters, trying to hit a ball 300 yards, escaping from the sand, holing a delicate three-footer or trying to mastermind the future of men’s professional golf or captaining his country all pale in significance now.

Tiger Woods’ priorities must lie elsewhere. He is in a bunker of a different kind. Recurring road incidents had already shown a deeply troubled side to this supreme champion.

And it has happened again.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says the United States is winning the war with Iran even as thousands of additional American troops deploy to the Middle East.

He has pilloried other countries for not helping the U.S., only to say later he does not need their assistance. He has twice delayed deadlines for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He has both threatened to “obliterate” Iran’s energy plants if the vital waterway remains largely shuttered and said the U.S. was “not affected” by the closure.

At one point this month, Trump said one of his predecessors — who, he strongly suggested, was a Democrat — privately told him he wished he had taken similar action against Iran. Representatives for every living former president quickly denied that such a conversation happened.

As the war entered its second month on Saturday, Trump’s penchant for embellishments, exaggerations and falsehoods is being tested in an environment where the stakes are much higher than an isolated political fight.

A president who has long embraced bluster and salesmanship to shape narratives and focus attention is confronting the unpredictability of war.

Leon Panetta, who served Democratic presidents as defense secretary, CIA director and White House chief of staff, said he has “seen enough wars where truth becomes the first casualty.”

“It’s not the first administration that has not told the truth about war,” he said. “But the president has made it kind of a very standard approach to almost any question to in one way or another kind of lie about what’s really happening and basically describe everything as fine and that we’re winning the war.”

Michael Rubin, a historian at the American Enterprise Institute who worked as a staff adviser on Iran and Iraq at the Pentagon from 2002 to 2004, said Trump is “the first president of any party in recent history that hasn’t self-constrained to live within rhetorical boundaries.”

“So of course it creates a great deal of confusion,” he said.

The zigs and zags are the point

To his critics, Trump’s style is a sign that doesn’t have a coherent long-term strategy. But for Trump, the zigs and zags seem like the point, a method that keeps his opponents — and pretty much everyone else — always on their heels.

The approach was clear this week in the hours before he announced the second delay of the deadline for Iran to reopen the strait. Asked what he would do about the deadline, Trump said he did not know and that he had a day before he had to decide.

“In Trump time, a day, you know what it is, that’s an eternity,” the Republican president said to laughter from members of his Cabinet.

But investors are unimpressed, with U.S. stocks closing out their worst week since the war began. To some on Capitol Hill, the freewheeling is more frustrating than amusing.

Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, lamented that Trump is “going back and forth and constantly contradicting himself.”

“The administration is winging it,” he said. “So how can you trust what the president says?”

Republicans were not willing to go that far, but their concern was apparent heading into a two-week break from Washington. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said his constituents “support what the president has done.”

“But most of my people are also equally or even more so concerned about cost of living,” he said.

Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who sits on the House Budget Committee and is a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said his constituents were on board with “blowing some crap up.” Nonetheless, he expressed reservations about the prospect of ground troops and said the administration has not provided enough details in briefings for lawmakers. Such sessions, he said, only reveal information you “read in the papers.”

“Taking out bad guys, taking out conventional (weapons), taking out or at least working to take out nuclear capability, pressing to keep the straits open, all those are good things and I’ve been supportive and will continue to be supportive,” Roy said. “But we’ve got to have a serious conversation about how long this is going to go, boots on the ground, all those things, press for further briefings and understanding of where it’s all headed.”

Republicans back Trump but there are risks

While Trump has maintained deep support among Republicans, a poll this week from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates that the president risks frustrating his voters if the U.S. gets involved in the kind of prolonged war in the Middle East that he promised to avoid.

Although 63% of Republicans back airstrikes against Iranian military targets, the survey found, only 20% back deploying American ground troops.

That reflects the political challenges ahead for Trump, who did not prepare the country for such an extensive overseas conflict. If the war drags on or escalates, pressure on Republicans could build before the November elections, when their majorities in Congress are at risk. Some in the party have said sending in ground troops would be a red line that Trump should not cross.

The administration also will likely need congressional support for an additional $200 billion to support the war. That amount of money, which Trump has said would be “nice to have,” even as he said the war was “winding down,” would be a tough vote at any time. But it poses particular risks for budget-conscious Republicans in an election year.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement that Trump is “right to highlight the vast success of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Iran desperately wants to make a deal because of how badly they are being decimated, but the President reserves all options, military or not, at all times,” she said.

There could be some ‘logic’ to Trump’s approach

Rubin, the former Iran and Iraq adviser at the Pentagon, said there could be some “logic” to the president’s ever-evolving rhetorical approach to the war. He said Trump’s initial comments about ongoing negotiations, which Iran denied, could “spread suspicion and fear within the regime circles.”

“Perhaps Donald Trump or those advising him simply want the Iranians to grow so paranoid they refuse to cooperate with each other or perhaps they even turn on each other,” he said. “But then again, there’s always a danger with Donald Trump of assuming that his rhetoric is anything more than shooting from the hip.”

Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said Trump is not going to be able to fully achieve his objectives, including the complete elimination of Iran’s nuclear program, “in the current trajectory.”

And if that is the case, Smith said, the president has the option to rely on his rhetorical skills to simply say the U.S. won — and end the war.

“As I’ve jokingly said, nobody I have ever met or heard of in human history is better at exaggerating his own accomplishments than Donald Trump,” Smith said. “So go knock yourself out and claim this was some great success.”