The government has responded to calls to create an independent panel
The government has rejected calls – including from hundreds of people in Greater Manchester – for a new way for parents to appeal over school absences.
At present, headteachers decide whether a child’s absence is unauthorised, with parents having little chance to appeal.
The petition, which has been signed by 14,968 people across the UK, calls for an independent panel to be set up to help ‘prevent bias’ in recording absences from school.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
It states: “As it stands, the decision whether a school absence is authorised or not lies solely with the headteacher or designated attendance officer. If this person deems the absence as not “exceptional” enough, or marks an illness absence as unauthorised, there is no formal right of appeal for parents.
“I’m proposing that the Government sets up an independent national appeals panel to allow parents to appeal a heads decision. This will prevent bias, ensure transparency, and put a stop to blanket policies within schools. Often, the nature of the absence means it should either be marked as authorised under code ‘I’, or authorised under code ‘C’ which is leave for exceptional circumstances. If a FPN is issued, parents are forced to risk court and a criminal conviction or accept liability by paying the FPN.”
How many people have signed the petition in my area?
In Greater Manchester almost 750 people have signed the petition as of 9.30pm on Wednesday, March 11. You can see how many people have signed the petition in your constituency below:
Altrincham and Sale West: 10
Ashton-under-Lyne: 44
Blackley and Middleton South: 27
Bolton North East: 23
Bolton South and Walkden:36
Bolton West: 15
Bury North: 26
Bury South: 16
Cheadle: 20
Hazel Grove: 30
Heywood and Middleton North: 34
Leigh and Atherton: 41
Makerfield: 38
Manchester Rusholme: 7
Manchester Withington: 8
Oldham East and Saddleworth: 27
Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton: 25
Rochdale: 25
Salford: 34
Stalybridge and Hyde: 44
Stockport: 29
Wigan: 51
Wythenshawe and Sale East: 39
Government response:
In a response to the petition published on Wednesday, March 11, the Government said it had no plans to introduce an independent panel.
It said: “The Government has no plans to introduce an independent national appeals panel for school absences and believes there are already sufficient routes for parents to challenge inaccurate absence coding.
“The Government has no plans to introduce an independent national appeals panel for school absences. When determining the most appropriate attendance or absence code, teachers and headteachers should use their professional judgement of each pupil’s individual circumstances, context and educational needs, alongside the ‘Working together to improve school attendance’ guidance and information provided by the parent or guardian. Existing processes including informal conversations, use of the school’s complaints procedure, local authority complaints procedures, Ofsted inspections and escalation routes to DfE and to the Local Government Ombudsman provide appropriate channels for oversight and raising concerns, negating the need for a separate appeals structure.
“Parents have a legal duty under the Education Act 1996 to ensure that their child of compulsory school age (5-16) receives a full‑time education, either by attending school or otherwise. Where a child is registered at a school, parents must ensure they attend regularly. Parents can be penalised if their child is absent from school without authorisation.
“We recognise there are situations in which a pupil is unable to attend school for a legally recognised reason. The Education Act 1996 sets out these situations in which an absent pupil will not be taken to have failed to attend school regularly. These include illness or other unavoidable circumstances, religious observance, where the school has given prior permission for absence, or where the local authority has not fulfilled any duty it has to help the child attend.
“Schools must record attendance in line with the School Attendance (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2024 and with regard to the DfE’s statutory guidance ‘Working together to improve school attendance’. Decisions about how an absence should be recorded depend on the individual facts of each case. Headteachers and school staff know their pupils well and are therefore best placed to decide how an absence should be recorded. In the vast majority of cases, a parent’s notification that their child is ill should be sufficient for the school to authorise the absence using code I (illness). Schools also have discretion to grant a leave of absence in exceptional circumstances and parents should speak to their headteacher and present their case where they feel that such an absence is required.
“The Department has however made clear in statutory guidance that, generally, a need or desire for a holiday or other absence for the purpose of leisure and recreation would not constitute an exceptional circumstance. The majority of penalty notices (93% in the 2024-25 academic year) are issued for term-time holidays.
“Introducing an independent appeals panel would be inappropriate, given the ‘Working Together To Improve School Attendance’ guidance states that parents, schools and local authorities hold responsibility for pupils’ attendance. It would also create a bureaucratic process for thousands of routine attendance decisions made every day. This would generate significant administrative burden for schools, local authorities and any central appeals body, which would need funding, diverting time and resources away from teaching and supporting pupils.
“The Government believes that existing routes already provide clear and fair ways for parents to raise concerns. Where a parent believes an absence has been wrongly recorded, they should discuss this with the school in the first instance. If they remain dissatisfied, they can make a formal complaint through the school’s complaints procedure. If they believe the school has acted unlawfully, they can also escalate their complaint to the Department for Education or, where relevant, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
“Local authorities also have established processes for reviewing evidence before issuing a penalty notice for unauthorised absence. Although there is no separate legal right of appeal, parents can challenge a penalty notice with the issuing local authority if they believe it was wrongly issued. Parents may provide evidence to support their case, and the authority must consider it carefully. If parents do not pay the notice and wish to contest it, the case may proceed to court, where they can present their arguments before magistrates. This provides an additional safeguard for parents who believe they have been treated unfairly.
“For these reasons, the Government does not believe that a new national appeals panel is necessary or appropriate. The current system already allows schools to apply professional judgement, gives parents clear ways to raise concerns or challenge decisions, and ensures that local authorities act carefully and proportionately in enforcing school attendance. This approach helps maintain consistency while keeping decision‑making close to the pupils and families who are directly affected.”






