Connect with us

NewsBeat

Kim Kardashian and Kylie Jenner lead the most daring Vanity Fair Oscars red carpet

Published

on

Kim Kardashian and Kylie Jenner lead the most daring Vanity Fair Oscars red carpet
The Kardashian/Jenner clan were out in full force (Picture: AP/Getty)

The Vanity Fair Oscars after-party returned for the biggest night in Hollywood, with some eye-popping looks on what was a grey carpet.

This year’s Los Angeles party saw the guest list slashed in half as part of a bid for increased exclusivity – but several of the most familiar faces were still in attendance.

The event was held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art after the 98th Academy Awards ceremony, during which One Battle After Another clinched the coveted best picture award, while Michael B Jordan and Jessie Buckley took home the gongs for best leading actors.

Kim Kardashian, 45, was among the stars at the VF bash, tottering before the cameras in mammoth platform heels and an appropriately Oscars gold dress. 

Advertisement

But Kim bafflingly completed the look with coloured contact lenses and distinctly unkempt hair. Perhaps her longtime hair stylist Chris Appleton was given the day off?

Elsewhere on the carpet, her two Jenner sisters were also in attendance, with Kendall, 30, in a baby blue number and Kylie, 28, donning her thrice-Oscar-losing boyfriend Timothee Chalamet, 30, as well as a black gown with a dramatic slit at the waist.

Since the big bash coincided with Mother’s Day, it was only fitting that momager Kris Jenner was there. The 70-year-old wore a tulle prom dress of sorts, arriving with her boyfriend Corey Gamble at the end of a gloved hand.

Kim Kardashian arrives at the Vanity Fair Oscar Party on Sunday, March 15, 2026, at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in Los Angeles. (Photo by Evan Agostini/Invision/AP)
Kim Kardashian went for Oscars gold on the carpet (Picture: Evan Agostini/Invision/AP)
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 15: Timoth??e Chalamet and Kylie Jenner attend the 2026 Vanity Fair Oscar Party hosted by Mark Guiducci at Los Angeles County Museum of Art on March 15, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Daniele Venturelli/WireImage)
Kylie Jenner supported her boyfriend Timothee Chalamet after his loss (Picture: Daniele Venturelli/WireImage)
Emilie Livingston and Jeff Goldblum arrive at the Vanity Fair Oscars party after the 98th Academy Awards, in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Emilie Livingston bared all (Picture: Reuters)

As far as the eyebrow-raising fits went, Jeff Goldblum’s wife Emilie Livingston, 43, might have taken the night with her bum-baring leotard, paired with sheer tights, which she wore next to her 73-year-old husband, who was dressed for distinctly cooler climes.

Other couples on the carpet together were Dua Lipa and Callum Turner, who beat the James Bond rumours by opting not to wear a classic tuxedo, instead pairing a regular humdrum suit with a grey shirt. 

Advertisement

Elsewhere on the carpet, Julia Fox, 36, rocked up in an apparent take on period dress, with a detailed floral bodice and exaggerated shoulders.

There was also Love Story star Sarah Pidgeon, who is currently playing Calvin Klein publicist Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy on the Disney Plus drama and so fittingly decided to wear…Calvin Klein.

Corey Gamble and Kris Jenner arrive at the Vanity Fair Oscars party after the 98th Academy Awards, in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok
Momager for Mother’s Day (Picture: Reuters)
Mandatory Credit: Photo by John Salangsang/Shutterstock (16737670gi) Julia Fox Vanity Fair Oscar Party 2026, Los Angeles, California, USA - 15 Mar 2026
Julia Fox with bleached brows (Picture: John Salangsang/Shutterstock)
Suki Waterhouse and Robert Pattinson at the 2026 Vanity Fair Oscar Party held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art on March 15, 2026 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Chad Salvador/WWD via Getty Images)
Suki Waterhouse and Robert Pattinson welcomed their first child in 2024 (Picture: Chad Salvador/WWD via Getty Images)

Who won at the Oscars 2026? Full list of winners

Best picture

One Battle After Another

Best director

Paul Thomas Anderson – One Battle After Another

Best actress

Jessie Buckley – Hamnet

Advertisement

Best actor

Michael B. Jordan – Sinners

Best supporting actor

Sean Penn – One Battle After Another

Best supporting actress

Amy Madigan – Weapons

Best casting

One Battle After Another

Advertisement

Adapted screenplay

One Battle After Another

Original screenplay

Sinners

Editing

One Battle After Another

Cinematography

Sinners

Advertisement

Production design

Frankenstein

Visual effects

Avatar: Fire and Ash

Costume design

Frankenstein

Makeup and hair

Frankenstein

Advertisement

Original score

Sinners

Original song

Golden from K-Pop Demon Hunters

Sound

F1

International feature

Sentimental Value

Advertisement

Documentary feature

Mr. Nobody Against Putin

Documentary short

All the Empty Rooms

Animated feature

K-Pop Demon Hunters

Animated short

The Girl Who Cried Pearls

Advertisement

Live-action short

Tied: The Singers and Two People Exchanging Saliva

The Vanity Fair bash was once the hottest ticket in town in the 1990s, with a guest list that only granted entry to the upper echelon of Tinseltown. The first ever iteration of the event invited just 100 people, including Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Prince, Robert De Niro and Anthony Hopkins.

Advertisement

Yet, in recent years, the party had become a victim of its own success, with a dwindling sense of exclusivity. 

The magazine’s new editor Mark Guiducci decided to slash the numbers in half, banning social media from inside the event and limiting all press to Vanity Fair journalists alone (the rest have been relegated to the grey carpet outside).

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NewsBeat

‘Part of Cambridge lost forever’ as restaurant makes way for student flats

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The plans by Downing College will see a city centre site next to Parker’s Piece redeveloped into 26 student rooms with restaurant space

CambridgeshireLive readers have heard that demolition has begun on a Cambridge restaurant to make way for new student accommodation and restaurant space. The project, led by Downing College, will redevelop a city centre site next to Parker’s Piece into 26 student rooms with restaurant facilities.

Several buildings at 19-35 Regent Street, including the former Cuba Libre restaurant and bar, are set for partial demolition.

Advertisement

Downing College Developments Ltd submitted the redevelopment plans, which were approved by Cambridge City Council in September 2024. CMP Architects, who designed the project, described the site as containing poorly maintained buildings that had been altered inconsistently over the years.

The plans include a retail unit on the ground floor, intended to provide a restaurant serving both residents and visitors. Above this, the student accommodation will feature 26 en-suite rooms, reports CambridgeshireLive. A council officer said the development would cause a modest reduction in market housing but would provide much-needed student accommodation.

A spokesperson from Demcom Demolition, which is carrying out the work, said all demolition is being done by hand, with bricks retained for reuse. The team is also completing enabling work inside before scaffolding can be erected.

Commenter Josh A thinks: “We don’t need more of these. What we really need are shops, cafes, pharmacies and the like – far more useful than another block of student accommodation. The solution is simple: if there’s no space, don’t build here and leave the existing buildings alone.”

Advertisement

Rob H agrees: “If student accommodation is genuinely in such high demand, why can’t they build it on the college campuses instead? It would make sense to use existing university land rather than taking over other parts of the city, which could be put to more practical and community-friendly uses.”

Stayfocused29 replies: “I’d normally be against this, but honestly, everything that has been put into that building ends up closing, and the empty units make the place look really unattractive. It’s frustrating because it could be such a vibrant spot, though the University’s ridiculously high rents may have contributed to the businesses failing in the first place.”

Weneedqueenmeghan believes: “The antiquated university has long outlived its usefulness and really needs to be closed down once and for all. Its outdated structures and outdated practices are holding back progress, and the city could put the space and resources to far better use.”

Rodney A points out: “Everyone going on about it being student accommodation might want to consider what would happen if all the students were taken out of the rental housing market. But by all means, keep repeating your ‘it’s only for students’ line.”

Advertisement

John W disagrees: “Another part of Cambridge lost forever. More student accommodation? The days when people would rent out a room in their own homes are gone. Oh well, they call it progress, apparently.”

Terry J adds: “The university is completely taking Cambridge for granted for its own selfish gain. How and why have they been allowed to take over our city like this?”

Andrew C says: “It’s remarkable how universities can get planning approval but contribute nothing to the infrastructure they rely on, while adding further strain to already damaged systems.”

Diane B comments: “What a shame. Do we really need even more student accommodation? What about the people who actually work here, not the professors, who can’t afford to live in the city? Our grown-up children, both working in essential services, can’t afford to live in the city they were born in. Then there are complaints about the cars they need to get to work. No, they can’t just cycle or take buses, as the buses don’t start early enough.”

Advertisement

Lisa G replies: “More student accommodation – why is that not surprising! Why not build something to help the city’s homeless or projects that actually benefit the people who live and work here? Of course, that never happens. It’s all about keeping the university happy, as usual.”

Another part of Cambridge is being transformed into student accommodation while market housing is reduced. Do you think the city should prioritise students over local residents and workers? Have your say in our comments section.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Nationwide says to check if you qualify for ‘life-changing’ extra payments

Published

on

Wales Online

You can check if you are eligible through the Nationwide website

Nationwide Building Society is encouraging people to check if they’re eligible for more than £550 in additional support. Customers can check heir eligibility for extra payments both online and over the phone.

Advertisement

Stephen Noakes, director of retail at Nationwide, recently spoke to a panel of MPs regarding the building society’s initiatives to improve financial inclusion. He discussed with the Treasury Committee the need to get people saving more, as well as how to ensure customers are accessing all the support they qualify for.

One resource he was eager to highlight is Nationwide’s Better Off Indicator, which can be used to determine if you’re entitled to any extra benefits, such as those from the DWP or via your local council. You simply input some information about your household situation and your finances, like your savings and income, and it will guide you towards any additional payments you might be eligible for.

Mr Noakes informed the committee: “We have calculators that can advise customers if they have additional benefits.” The provider introduced these online tools back in June 2025.

Bank account alert for people with over £5,000

The building society chief said there have been big successes for those who have used the online benefit check. Mr Noakes said: “We only started in the last six months – but 18,000 households have looked at it and 11,000 had benefits.

Advertisement

“The average they have managed to gain is £560 a month. This activity can be quite life-changing.” Nationwide launched the calculator tool in collaboration with Policy in Practice.

If you’d rather discuss the support available to you over the phone, you can ring 0300 3730619. Guidance on the Nationwide website explains: “Being eligible to claim for benefits is not just for people who can’t work.

“Many people assume they are not eligible, leaving £24billion in benefits going unclaimed in the UK every year. There are lots of support payments and benefits that could help you be better off.”

Who could qualify for the extra payments?

The guidance sets out that these five groups may be eligible for some extra cash:

Advertisement
  • You or your partner are out of work
  • You are renting your home
  • You have children
  • You have a disability or care for someone who has a disability
  • You are receiving the state pension

What extra support could I qualify for?

The information page also lists some of the benefits that you may be entitled to.

These include:

  • Universal Credit
  • Pension Credit
  • Carer’s Allowance
  • Child Benefits
  • Personal Independence Payment
  • Council tax discounts

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Rory McIlroy reassessing Masters preparation after Players Championship struggle

Published

on

Belfast Live

Rory McIlroy’s back injury hampered his title defence at TPC Sawgrass as he finished T46 at the Players Championship, with the Northern Irishman now weighing up whether to play another event before his Masters title defence

Rory McIlroy is considering adding another tournament to his schedule before defending his Masters title next month, following a lacklustre performance at the Players Championship.

Advertisement

The Northern Irishman, who was defending champion at TPC Sawgrass, saw his preparations disrupted by a back injury and could only manage a disappointing tie for 46th place.

McIlroy intends to assess his physical condition over the coming days before deciding whether to compete again ahead of Augusta, where he secured the career grand slam last year.

“I’ll see how my body feels,” the world number two said.

“We’ll see how I feel in practice and at home and if I get itchy feet at home maybe add an event at some point.

Advertisement

“I feel like it was important to make the weekend here and play an extra couple of days. I’m happy I got through four days and my body feels good.

“I feel like my game sort of progressively got a little bit better as the week went on, even though the scores probably didn’t reflect it over the weekend.

“But yeah, really just see how the next week goes, see how once I get back to actually a full practice schedule and in the gym and stuff like that, see how my body reacts to that, and then I’ll see.”

American Cameron Young clinched his second PGA Tour title with a stunning one-shot victory from England’s Matt Fitzpatrick.

Advertisement

A brilliant birdie at the famous par-three 17th proved vital for Young and a brilliant tee shot on the 18th coupled with Fitzpatrick finding the pine straw before finishing with a bogey five gave Young the biggest win of his carrer to date.

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.

Click here to sign up to our sport newsletter, bringing you the latest sports news, headlines and top stories

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The Players Championship is ‘special but not likely to become fifth major’

Published

on

Movies that Made Me: Guillermo del Toro

Prime among the reasons why it is such a compelling competition is the Stadium Course itself. It does what it says on the tin, delighting huge crowds with a nerve-jangling test for the best players in the world year in, year out.

“I remember when I played it, I stood on the 18th tee and was scared witless,” recalled European Ryder Cup player Oliver Wilson. “You can never, ever relax on that golf course.”

And so it came to pass that Young and Fitzpatrick arrived on that final tee box locked together with this pretigious title on the line. The vast expanse of water down the left had gobbled up Young’s ball less than 24 hours earlier.

Fitzpatrick had his own demons given his double bogey on that same hole, also in the third round.

Advertisement

The final day task demanded the utmost golfing courage and Young was in the mood. Of the leading contenders only he and Justin Thomas had taken on the teasing pin tight to the right edge of the island green 17th.

Young was rewarded with the birdie that drew him level with his Ryder Cup rival Fitzpatrick. Now it was time to unleash probably the furthest drive ever seen on Sawgrass’ closing hole.

At 375 yards, it was the longest to be officially recorded and crucially he found the fairway. Fitzpatrick also went with driver, but found the pine straw among the trees down the right.

If he had his time again, would a three-wood have been a better option? Decision making is something that comes under the microscope at the moments of the most intensity.

Advertisement

“I know Cam hits a draw, his moved a little bit,” Fitzpatrick said. “I figured mine would do the same. Obviously just went dead straight.”

Regardless of arguments over strategy, this was a big title decided by the finest of margins. Fitzpatrick could only bogey despite doing little else wrong.

Young went out and won it. This after Ludvig Aberg had thrown away his commanding position at the start of the back nine.

Again the golf course exacted demands that induced the Swede’s crucial errors as he found water on the 11th and 12th holes.

Advertisement

“The risk and reward of the back nine asks relentless questions and he failed pretty much immediately,” said Wilson who was part of the 5 Live commentary team in Florida.

“You can’t help thinking back to the chances he had at the end of the third round and then early on the final day. This course is always ready to bite, so you have to take advantage when you’re playing your best golf.”

And that made for a heady, suspenseful mix for those watching either on the ground or on television.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Pep Guardiola takes drastic action on eve of crucial Man City vs Real Madrid clash

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Manchester City are aiming to stage a Champions League comeback against Real Madrid and boss Pep Guardiola has taken a novel approach to his side’s preparations

Manchester City will not train the day before their Champions League clash with Real Madrid, Pep Guardiola has confirmed. The Premier League side welcome the Spanish giants to the Etihad Stadium this week for the second leg of their last-16 clash.

Advertisement

City are already 3-0 down ahead of that game – Federico Valverde’s hat-trick having seen Real race into a stunning lead at the Bernabeu. Despite Guardiola’s side needing an almost flawless performance to get themselves back into the tie, the Spanish coach has given his players time off due to their packed schedule.

They will not be taking to the training pitches the day before the game, with focus instead being on recovery. While Guardiola’s move is unusual given the importance of the game, it is not unprecedented. The former Barcelona boss also gave his side time off before a league stage showdown with Borussia Dortmund earlier this season.

Speaking at the time, he said: “We will train tomorrow [Monday] morning. I’ve done it a few times – maybe not a lot but a few times.

FOLLOW OUR MAN CITY FB PAGE! Follow our Manchester City Mirror Football Facebook page

Advertisement

READ MORE: Pep Guardiola tells Man City stars to ‘stay at home’ in brutal warningREAD MORE: Pep Guardiola changes tune on Man City’s title race hopes after Arsenal steal march

Bournemouth was so demanding that I prefer they stay at home and tomorrow morning we train. No-one is going to change the schedule because we have a lot of competitions so it is what it is.”

And while Guardiola has given players time off, he has already sent his squad a strong warning. He suggested that any stars who don’t believe that the side could come back would be best served not attending the game.

Speaking after the weekend draw against West Ham United, Guardiola said: “If they don’t believe, it’s a problem. They are adults. They have good salaries.

Advertisement

“If they don’t believe in that in the Champions League, go home, stay home. We have to try. What do we have to lose?

“Madrid never came back in history? I don’t know how many – 50 Champions League games, they never came back from 3-0? Of course, it’s a tough result. But we have to try, for respect for the people, for fans, for our job, you know?”

Following the clash with Real, City will then turn their attention back to their fading Premier League title hopes. Guardiola’s side currently sit nine points adrift of Arsenal after being held to a 1-1 draw by West Ham at the weekend. The Gunners beat Everton with two late goals from Viktor Gyokeres and Max Dowman.

Advertisement

Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Content cannot be displayed without consent

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Tricky negotiations begin Monday to renew a trade pact between the United States, Mexico and Canada

Published

on

Tricky negotiations begin Monday to renew a trade pact between the United States, Mexico and Canada

WASHINGTON (AP) — Every day more than $4 billion worth of goods cross the United States’ borders with Canada and Mexico – U.S. auto parts headed for car factories in northern Mexico, cartons of Mexican avocados bound for California supermarkets, Canadian aluminum destined to become cans of Campbell Soup.

Much of this bustling cross-border commerce is duty-free, thanks to the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, that President Donald Trump negotiated with America’s northern and southern neighbors during his first term.

But the future of the USMCA , which took effect July 1, 2020, is cloudy as the three countries begin what could be a tempestuous attempt to renew the pact this year. The United States is demanding changes to the treaty, and the top U.S. trade negotiator told Politico in December that Trump would be willing to pull the United States out of the pact if he can’t get the deal he wants. Trump also suggested last fall that the United States could negotiate separate deals with Canada and Mexico, ending the three-country North American bloc that previous administrations saw as crucial to competing economically with China and the European Union.

The talks kick off Monday between U.S. and Mexican trade officials.

Advertisement

The North American economies could agree to renew USMCA as it is for another 16 years— a prospect that appears unlikely. Or they could keep working on ways to improve it; under a convoluted renewal process, they have until 2036 to reach an agreement — or the pact expires.

Meantime, any USMCA country can pull out of the pact provided it gives its two partners six months’ notice – an option that Canada and Mexico, heavily dependent on trade with the United States, fear the impulsive Trump might end up choosing.

At stake is $1.6 trillion worth of annual trade in goods between the United States and its two USMCA partners. Mexico and Canada are far ahead of China in both exports to and imports from the United States. American farmers are especially keen to see the deal renewed: Last year, they shipped nearly $31 billion in agricultural products to Mexico and $28 billion to Canada.

U.S. imports from Canada and Mexico were spared the worst of Trump’s 2025 tariffs; many goods compliant with USMCA rules continued to enter the United States duty free. Still, a number of products did not get protection from the U.S. levies, including medium- and heavy-duty trucks, which face a 25% tariff. A 50% tariff on steel, aluminum and copper remains in effect, as does a 17% tariff on Mexican tomatoes.

Advertisement

The USMCA replaced the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement negotiated by President George H.W. Bush and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.

Trump and other critics had criticized NAFTA as a killer of U.S. jobs because it encouraged U.S. companies to relocate factories south of the border to take advantage of low-wage Mexican labor and then send goods back to the United States duty free.

The USMCA, ratified by Congress with rare support from Republicans and Democrats alike, ended up being very similar to NAFTA. But it did contain provisions designed to encourage factories in the region to pay higher wages and make sure that more of what they made originated in North America.

The new pact updated North American trade rules for the digital age. The USMCA, for instance, bars the United States, Mexico and Canada from slamming each other with import taxes on music, software, games and other products sold electronically.

Advertisement

A proud Trump declared the USMCA “the fairest, most balanced and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed.’’

But the president’s enthusiasm seems to have waned. In January, he expressed little interest in the upcoming talks to renew the agreement. The effort, he said, offered “no real advantage to us. It’s irrelevant to me.’’

The USMCA did little to ease one of Trump’s biggest complaints: The U.S. deficit in the trade of goods with Mexico, which rose last year to a record $197 billion as the United States reduced its reliance on Chinese imports. The U.S. also ran a merchandise trade deficit with Canada of $46.4 billion last year, a decrease from 2024.

“Improvements are required for it to deliver the high-wage U.S. manufacturing powerhouse and balanced trade (Trump) promised and we need,” said Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program at the American Economic Liberties Project.

Advertisement

The United States plans to push for a series of changes, including stronger rules to ensure that goods from China won’t slip into the United States under USMCA; to encourage more production in the United States; and to ensure more access to Canada’s protected dairy market for U.S. farmers.

Mexico’s core priorities are to avoid a major rewrite of the agreement and to make rules of origin more flexible —allowing imports of parts from outside North America when they are not available in the region. Mexican negotiators also want assurances that anything agreed to will stick, providing insurance against Trump’s unpredictability and his enthusiasm for tariffs.

Mexico wants to minimize tariffs as much as possible. Mexican Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said Mexico wants to strengthen the dispute resolution system already in place under the treaty. That would not eliminate the possibility of tariffs, but it would provide clear, swift channels for seeking solutions when problems arise, he said.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s administration will have to simultaneously manage existing security issues, which are ongoing after the killing of Jalisco New Generation Cartel’s leader in late February, and which could influence economic matters.

Advertisement

Mexico anticipates that Canada will join the talks later, but its top priority in the coming months is to reach agreements and maintain the free trade with the United States, its main commercial partner.

Mexico is pushing the idea that the treaty is also good for the US. “The integration of our countries is an absolute prerequisite for the United States to remain competitive,” Ebrard said recently. “We must move forward together; otherwise, we will not succeed”

____

Verza reported from Mexico City.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Is Louis Theroux religious? Filmmakers previous comments as Netflix doc releases

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Louis Theroux’s new Netflix documentary Inside The Manosphere has sparked questions about the filmmaker’s own religious background and what he has said about his faith

Louis Theroux: Inside The Manosphere trailer from Netflix

The latest documentary from Louis Theroux has already sparked a significant reaction among viewers since it debuted on Netflix.

Advertisement

It is the author and filmmaker’s first full-length title for the streaming platform and the latest in a distinguished career of creating thought-provoking films that scrutinise society. In Inside The Manosphere, Louis engages with some of the most contentious social media influencers who form part of this subculture.

These figures have established their reputations by expressing controversial views online. However, whilst doing so, they assert they are guiding young men on how to lead their lives.

The documentary also highlights the extraordinary measures these influencers take to generate income, with the majority raking in millions, reports the Mirror.

Some of the debatable views these content creators disseminate seem to concentrate on the same subjects. Primarily the role of women, whilst a few also appear to repeatedly mention Jewish people.

Advertisement

Louis endeavours to discuss and address these anti-Semitic messages shared by the subjects of the documentary. This has led many people to question whether Louis Theroux is Jewish himself. Here’s what you need to know.

READ MORE: Louis Theroux’s net worth as Manosphere Netflix documentary starts streamingREAD MORE: All you need to know about Justin Waller from Netflix’s Inside the Manosphere

Advertisement

Is Louis Theroux Jewish?

Viewers may recall Louis being questioned about his own religion in previous documentaries. The broadcaster has typically avoided responding directly, as that is usually not what the documentary is aiming to explore.

However, he has spoken about his faith on numerous occasions. In his Ultra Zionists special for the BBC, he disclosed that he is an atheist.

Reflecting on his encounter with neo-Nazis, he also revealed: “I can disclose this now… I’m not actually Jewish. I have no problem with being identified as Jewish, but it’s just not a factual statement.”

If you Google the question: ‘Is Louis Theroux Jewish?’ there is a possibility its AI summary tool will claim that he is. It might also suggest that he has Jewish ancestry. According to the man himself however, this is not accurate.

Advertisement

It makes the same error for his cousin, actor and screenwriter Justin Theroux. However, in that case it is sourcing the information from an interview with the showrunner of The Leftovers, which Justin starred in.

Speaking to American Magazine, Louis touched on the role of religion during his upbringing, sharing that his parents were “both lapsed in their faiths”.

He added: “My dad was raised Catholic and my mum was Church of England, but we never went to church growing up. If anything I do feel I missed out on it a bit. Because I think [faith] gives you a mental furniture and almost something to push back on.”

Advertisement

Louis Theroux: Inside The Manosphere is streaming on Netflix

For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new ** Everything Gossip ** website.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Dubai airport flights suspended again after drone attack and fire

Published

on

Dubai airport flights suspended again after drone attack and fire

Dubai authorities tackled a fire near the city’s international airport on Monday, following a drone attack that prompted a temporary suspension of flights.

The latest crisis unfolded as the US-Israel war with Iran continues to cause significant disruption to global aviation. Flights across the Middle East have faced widespread cancellations, rescheduling, and rerouting, with much of the region’s airspace closed due to fears of missile and drone strikes. The ongoing conflict has also contributed to soaring fuel prices.

Monday’s attack is the third at Dubai airport, one of the world’s busiest international travel hubs, since Iran commenced its assaults on Gulf nations on 28 February. Tehran has stated these strikes are aimed at the US presence in the region. But Iran has repeatedly targeted civilian infrastructure, such as airports, hotels, and ports, with missiles and drones, despite the United Arab Emirates and other Gulf countries, alongside Iraq, Jordan, and Turkey, hosting US military facilities.

No injuries were reported in the incident and flights were resuming just after 6am.

Advertisement

“A drone incident in the vicinity of Dubai International Airport affected one of the fuel tanks,” the Dubai Media Office said on X (formerly Twitter).

An Emirates Airbus A380 passenger aircraft prepares for landing at Dubai International Airport on 8 March
An Emirates Airbus A380 passenger aircraft prepares for landing at Dubai International Airport on 8 March (AFP/Getty)

Traffic was temporarily halted on road and tunnel links with the airport, police said, while the Emirates airline suspended flights.

Some flights were diverted to the nearby Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai Media Office said.

Gulf Arab states have faced more than 2,000 missile and drone attacks since 28 February, with targets including US diplomatic missions and military bases, but also key Gulf oil infrastructure ​as well as homes and offices.

The UAE, which normalised relations with Iran’s arch-foe Israel in 2020, has faced the brunt of the attacks, but all Gulf Arab states have been affected, and all have condemned Iran.

Advertisement

On 11 March, two drones fell near Dubai International Airport, which suffered damage on the first day of the conflict during an overnight Iranian attack across the Gulf states.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Keir Starmer Resists Trumps Call For Navy Deployment

Published

on

Keir Starmer Resists Trumps Call For Navy Deployment

Keir Starmer has resisted Donald Trump’s calls for the UK to send warships to the Middle East to keep the Strait of Hormuz open.

The prime minister said the UK “will not be drawn into the wider war” as he repeatedly refused to say whether the Royal Navy will be deployed.

Trump last week called on Britain to join an international effort to keep the vital waterway – which carries around one-fifth of the world’s oil supply – open.

The US president said: “Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a nation that has been totally decapitated.”

Advertisement

But speaking at a Downing Street press conference on Monday, Starmer demonstrated his reluctance to accede to Trump’s latest request for help.

He said: “We’re working with all of our allies, including our European partners, to bring together a viable collective plan that can restore freedom of navigation in the region as quickly as possible and ease the economic impacts.”

The PM added: “It’ll have to be something which is agreed by as many partners as possible, is my strong view. We’re not at that stage yet, but we are working hard.”

Trump has even suggested that the future of Nato could be at risk if other countries do not help America keep the Strait open.

Advertisement

He told the Financial Times: “We have a thing called Nato. We’ve been very sweet. We didn’t have to help them with Ukraine … but we helped them.

“Now we’ll see if they help us because I’ve long said that we’ll be there for them but they won’t be there for us. I’m not sure that they’d be there.

“If there’s no response or if it’s a negative response, I think it will be very bad for the future of Nato.”

But that was dismissed by General Sir Nick Carter, the former head of the British Army, who said the president had misunderstood Nato’s role.

Advertisement

He said: “It was not an alliance that was designed for one of the allies to go on a war of choice and then oblige everyone else to follow.”

Starmer’s reluctance to send the Navy to defend the Strait of Hormuz risks putting further pressure on his already-strained relationship with Trump.

The PM turned down the president’s initial request to use RAF bases to launch strikes on Iran at the start of the war.

Starmer has subsequently said US jets can fly from British bases, but only to carry out “defensive” operations.

Advertisement

Speaking on board Air Force One on Sunday, Trump said: “I don’t want them after we win the war, I want them before we start the war.

“I can say this, and I said it to them: we will remember.”

However, Starmer insisted he and Trump – who spoke on the phone on Sunday – still have a good relationship.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What time today’s match starts, odds and how to watch

Published

on

What time today’s match starts, odds and how to watch

Nic Berry, the Australian, was due to referee but has been replaced by Georgian referee Nika Amashukeli because of travel difficulties caused by the Middle East conflict.

England

Steve Borthwick has kept faith with the back line from the historic loss to Italy, with Ollie Chessum coming into the pack at blindside flanker in the one change to the starting XV.

“Ollie was disappointed that he wasn’t starting post the Ireland game,” Borthwick told BBC Sport on Tuesday. “He was disappointed and frustrated with his performance in the Ireland game.

Advertisement

“I thought he came on against Italy and did a really good job, from a ball-carrying perspective, from a line-out perspective, the contact area, the energy he gave to the team.”

England flanker Tom Curry has been ruled out of Saturday’s match after suffering a calf injury in the warm-up in Rome, while Ollie Lawrence continues to struggle with a knee issue.

Starting XV: Daly; Roebuck, Freeman, S Atkinson, Murley; F Smith, Spencer; Genge, George, Heyes, Itoje (capt), Coles, Chessum, Pepper, Earl
Replacements: Cowan-Dickie, Rodd, Davison, Cunningham-South, Underhill, Pollock, Van Poortvliet, M Smith

England’s Six Nations squad

Forwards: Ollie Chessum (Leicester Tigers), Arthur Clark (Gloucester), Alex Coles (Northampton), Luke Cowan-Dickie (Sale), Chandler Cunningham-South (Harlequins), Tom Curry (Sale), Theo Dan (Saracens), Trevor Davison (Northampton), Ben Earl (Saracens), Greg Fisilau (Exeter), Ellis Genge (Bristol), Jamie George (Saracens), Joe Heyes (Leicester), Maro Itoje (Saracens), Emmanuel Iyogun (Northampton), Guy Pepper (Bath), Henry Pollock (Northampton), Bevan Rodd (Sale) Vilikesa Sela (Bath), Sam Underhill (Bath).

Advertisement

Backs: Henry Arundell (Bath), Seb Atkinson (Gloucester), Elliot Daly (Saracens), Fraser Dingwall (Northampton), Immanuel Feyi-Waboso (Exeter), George Ford (Sale Sharks), Tommy Freeman (Northampton), George Furbank (Northampton), Alex Mitchell (Northampton), Cadan Murley (Harlequins), Max Ojomoh (Bath), Henry Slade (Exeter), Marcus Smith (Harlequins), Ben Spencer (Bath Rugby), Freddie Steward (Leicester), Jack van Poortvliet (Leicester).

Forwards: Dorian Aldegheri (Toulouse), Uini Atonio (La Rochelle), Hugo Auradou (Pau), Cyril Baille (Toulouse), Paul Boudehent (La Rochelle), Joshua Brennan (Toulouse), François Cros (Toulouse), Alexandre Fischer (Bayonne), Jean-Baptiste Gros (Toulon), Mickaël Guillard (Lyon), Oscar Jegou (La Rochelle), Anthony Jelonch (Toulouse), Maxime Lamothe (Bordeaux Bègles), Julien Marchand (Toulouse), Temo Matiu (Bordeaux Bègles), Peato Mauvaka (Toulouse), Emmanuel Meafou (Toulouse), Régis Montagne (Clermont-Auvergne), Rodrigue Neti (Toulouse), Lenni Nouchi (Montpellier), Charles Ollivon (Toulon), Dany Priso (Toulon), Thomas Staniforth (Castres), Tevita Tatafu (Bayonne), Cameron Woki (Bordeaux Bègles).

Backs: Grégoire Arfeuil (Pau), Théo Attissogbe (Pau), Louis Bielle-Biarrey (Bordeaux Bègles), Fabien Brau-Boirie (Pau), Romain Buros (Bordeaux Bègles), Thibault Daubagna (Pau), Nicolas Depoortere (Bordeaux Bègles), Gaël Dréan (Toulon), Antoine Dupont (Toulouse, captain), Kalvin Gourgues (Toulouse), Aaron Grandidier Nkanang (Pau), Matthieu Jalibert (Bordeaux Bègles), Yoram Moefana (Bordeaux Bègles), Noah Nene (Stade Français), Thomas Ramos (Stade Toulousain), Baptiste Serin (RC Toulon), Ugo Seunes (Racing 92).

When did France and England last win the Six Nations?

England last won the tournament in 2020. France were champions last year.

Advertisement

England’s last Grand Slam was in 2016 while Les Bleus achieved the feat in 2022.

What was the score last year?

England ended a three-year losing run against France in the Six Nations last year by winning 26-25 in a classic at Twickenham, Elliot Daly scoring the decisive late try.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025