Parking companies also say there will be a new backlog as they take more people to court
Proposed changes to parking regulations risk urban areas becoming “gridlocked” and the court system being “overwhelmed”, an industry body has claimed. The British Parking Association (BPA), which represents parking operators, warned about the “unintended and avoidable consequences” of the Government’s planned code of practice for the sector in Britain.
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) consultation document on the proposals stated it is considering banning the addition of debt recovery fees to parking tickets. These fees – currently capped at £70 – are charged when parking operators use debt recovery agencies to attempt to collect money for unpaid tickets.
The consultation also sought views on the cap on parking tickets, which is currently £100 with a 40% discount if paid within 14 days. The BPA claimed banning debt recovery fees would result in car park operators taking more cases to court as that would be their “only option left” to pursue drivers for tickets that have not been paid.
It also expressed concern that an “insufficient” maximum limit on parking tickets would create a “parking free for all” as it would reduce the deterrent for drivers ignoring parking rules. BPA chief policy and engagement officer Alison Tooze said: “We fully support and welcome the Government’s code of practice.
“However, it is our responsibility to warn against unintended and avoidable problems. The Government code framework has good intentions. However, we face an operational reality where we could see ‘Carmageddon’ in towns and cities and the already struggling court system being completely overwhelmed.
“We absolutely do not want this to happen. The code is being developed with the goal of protecting decent drivers, vulnerable road users and communities, yet there is a real danger that it could have the opposite effect and bring unintentional chaos.
“We have seen high-profile examples of this across the country including in Bournemouth and Aberystwyth where they were completely gridlocked by unfair motorist behaviour. Nobody wants to see this on a bigger scale and these examples illustrate what does happen in reality when drivers are not concerned about the consequences of breaking the rules.”
But the RAC warned that the threat of debt recovery fees can make drivers pay “unfair” parking tickets they would otherwise challenge. The organisation’s head of policy, Simon Williams, said: “We don’t support the use of debt recovery companies by the private parking industry and we hope to see it tackled in the Government code of practice when it comes into force.
“A £100 parking charge notice is bad enough but if this isn’t paid in 28 days it automatically gets increased by £70 when a debt recovery letter lands on the doormat. This seems disproportionate and could scare people into paying rather than appealing any unfair fines.”
Press Association analysis of Government data shows private parking companies issued a record 15.9 million parking tickets in the year to the end of September 2025. The industry has been accused of using misleading and confusing signs, aggressive debt collection and unreasonable fees.
A Bill to enable the introduction of a code of practice for the industry received royal assent in March 2019. This code, planned to come into force across Britain by the end of 2023, included halving the cap on tickets for most parking offences to £50, creating a fairer appeals system and banning the use of aggressive language on tickets.
But it was withdrawn by the Conservative government in June 2022 after a legal challenge by parking companies. A new consultation on the code by the current Labour Government closed in September last year.
A MHCLG spokesperson said: “Motorists must be protected when using private car parks and we are determined to drive up standards in the industry. No final decision has been made on the debt recovery fee cap and we will set out further details on the private parking code of practice as soon as possible.”
