Connect with us
DAPA Banner

NewsBeat

‘My crippling pain and symptoms were dismissed for 10 years – I wish they’d have listened’

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Tehyana Johnson, 22, says she was ‘fobbed off’ for more than a decade before finally receiving her diagnosis

Advertisement

A young woman who claims her endometriosis symptoms were “ignored” for a decade, with her weight or periods blamed as the reason for her crippling pain, has expressed she wishes “someone would have just listened”.

Tehyana Johnson, 22, said her symptoms, which included painful periods and severe bleeding, blood in her urine, widespread body pain and vomiting, were repeatedly disregarded by doctors.

From 2014 onwards, she claims she was “fobbed off” and told her symptoms were down to her weight or “just a bad period”, and she reckons she has attended more than 250 consultations in the past three years alone.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

Advertisement

Tehyana, who lives in Norwich, Norfolk, said she self-diagnosed herself with endometriosis – when cells similar to the ones in the lining of the womb are discovered elsewhere in the body – prior to receiving her official diagnosis in July 2025.

This came following a laparoscopy, a form of keyhole surgery, which uncovered her endometriosis had been found extensively, with lesions and scar tissue present on numerous organs, including her bowels.

Although she felt “vindicated” by the diagnosis, Tehyana believes much of this could have been prevented and she is now campaigning for earlier diagnosis for this “invisible” and currently incurable condition.

“I’d been fobbed off for so long and told that this isn’t what’s wrong with me, so when I was diagnosed, I almost felt vindicated because I was right – but I was angry,” Tehyana told PA Real Life.

Advertisement

“I was doing the research into what’s wrong with me and I was right every single time. But this is something I’m going to have to live with for the rest of my life because everything we have tried so far hasn’t worked. I wish someone would have just listened to me in the first place.”

According to the charity Endometriosis UK, on average, it takes more than eight years from the first GP visit to get a diagnosis for endometriosis – a condition which affects 176 million women worldwide.

Symptoms of endometriosis vary but can include pelvic pain, painful periods that interfere with everyday life, heavy menstrual bleeding, and pain during or after sex or when urinating.

Tehyana said it took around a decade to receive her official diagnosis, and, along the way, she was consistently dismissed by doctors and healthcare professionals.

Advertisement

She said she started her period aged nine, experienced heavy bleeding and was diagnosed with an iron deficiency, and this was managed by taking iron tablets and eating iron-rich foods.

However, from the age of 12, her symptoms worsened to include nausea, vomiting and such severe cramping that she would be “off school, in bed for days”.

“I couldn’t move and I’d just curl up into the foetal position,” said Tehyana, who works as a regional assistant for a social care company.

“That would go on for days… but when we went to see the doctors when I was about 14, there was no investigation and they just stuck me on the pill.”

Advertisement

Tehyana said the pill stopped her periods, although she still experienced “phantom pain” and occasional light bleeding, and she required physiotherapy for back pain but was told this was due to “growing pains”.

She said her symptoms continued to worsen, even leading to hospital admissions as the pain felt like her “body was on fire”, but still she was “ignored”.

“I would go to hospital, and they would say, ‘are you sure it’s not just a bad period?’,” she explained.

Advertisement

“They’d tell me to go back to my GP and, effectively, ignore me, and then my GP would say, ‘if your pain is that bad, you need to go to hospital’.”

‘Your weight is my ideal weight as a 6ft 5in man’

In 2023, Tehyana said she was finally referred to a gynaecologist, but she was stuck on the waiting list for a year and her symptoms affected her ability to sleep, walk and study.

During this time, she changed GP surgeries and was fortunate to see a locum doctor who recognised the extent of her pain, prescribed codeine for pain management and escalated her referral to urgent.

In 2024, she said she was seen by a male gynaecologist and had subsequent ultrasound and MRI scans, which came back clear, and she was again told she did not have endometriosis.

Advertisement

She said she was instead told her weight was the cause of her symptoms.

“He spent the whole (appointment), telling me it’s because of my weight… and he said to me: ‘Your weight is my ideal weight as a 6ft 5in man’,” she said.

“Trying to explain (my symptoms) to someone who has already decided what he thinks is the answer, he just wasn’t listening.”

Advertisement

However, with her “debilitating pain”, Tehyana knew something was wrong and started doing her own research, which led her to learn about endometriosis while at university.

She continued: “I wasn’t going into my lessons because I couldn’t get up, I didn’t have any support, so I started Googling my symptoms and looking at WebMD and I came across endometriosis.

“I just thought, wait a second, this is what’s been going on with me for the past 10 years.”

Later in 2024, Tehyana experienced an unplanned pregnancy that became a suspected ectopic pregnancy – when a fertilised egg implants itself outside of the womb – but she said doctors dismissed this, too.

Advertisement

A week later during a private scan, clinicians identified what appeared to be a ruptured ectopic pregnancy, which can be life-threatening, and she was rushed to hospital for further investigations.

It was discovered she had suffered a partial rupture, but Tehyana said the pregnancy later “dissolved” on its own before surgery was needed.

After pushing for a laparoscopy, which she said is considered “the gold standard” for diagnosing endometriosis, she was placed on the waiting list.

Advertisement

During the year-long wait, however, her symptoms continued to worsen, including severe abdominal pain, nausea, bladder spasms, bowel dysfunction and debilitating sciatica.

“It’s traumatic. I’m on the floor, I’m screaming, crying, and the pain lasts for hours,” she said.

In July 2025, Tehyana finally underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy and, when she woke from surgery, she was informed that endometriosis had been found extensively.

Although some of the tissue was removed, she was told not all of it could be excised safely due to the extent and location of it.

Advertisement

“They said there are lesions which look like they’ve been there for about 15 years, and I’ve got massive scarring on basically everything,” she said.

“At this point, I’m thinking, you’ve left it so long that now there’s not a chance that (treatment) will work.”

Tehyana said she still experiences “flare ups”, but she is pushing for more referrals and says using her TENS machine, which passes a weak electrical current to the nerves, helps ease her pain.

She may need further surgery in future as part of her treatment or, in a more severe case, a hysterectomy to remove her womb, but in the meantime, she is determined to raise more awareness and campaign for more education and support.

Advertisement

“Always advocate for yourself and fight for yourself… but you’re not alone as there are millions of us with this condition and there are support groups,” she said.

“I’d say to GPs, think about if this was your child or your wife or your partner, you’d want them to be heard.

“Medical professionals need to educate themselves and be willing to be educated again.”

Advertisement

This Endometriosis Awareness Month, intimate wellness brand Intimina is urging women to speak up and raise awareness of endometriosis, which takes an average of eight years and 10 months to diagnose.

Dr Susanna Unsworth, women’s health expert for Intimina, said: “Too many women are still told that severe period pain is ‘just something they have to live with’.

“But pain that stops you going about your normal daily life is not normal and should always be assessed.

“If your periods are affecting your quality of life, trust your instincts, seek medical advice and keep advocating for yourself.

Advertisement

“Women deserve to be listened to when they say something isn’t right.”

To find out more information, visit www.intimina.com.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Couples share 30% of their gut bacteria. Here’s how that may affect health

Published

on

Couples share 30% of their gut bacteria. Here’s how that may affect health

When living with a partner, you might be sharing more than just the same home, lifestyle and interests. You might also share various microscopic organisms residing on and in you.

This community of microorganisms, which consists of mainly bacteria, viruses and fungi, is known collectively as the human microbiome. The various microbiomes found throughout the body all play an important role in health.

From birth, the human microbiome is shaped by our interactions with our mother, who introduces diverse microorganisms that build our immune and digestive systems. As we get older, social interactions with our close community continue influencing this delicate ecosystem.

The people we live with have huge influence on what microbes we have in our microbiome. In fact, it’s thought that partners share around 30% of their resident microbes in the gut alone.

Advertisement

But it isn’t just the microbes in your gut that may be similar to your partner. The microbes in many other parts of the body may also be shared with your loved one – and this could potentially affect your health.

Gut microbiome

Diet and lifestyle are thought to have the greatest influence on the gut microbiome’s make-up. But studies on couples have found that living with your partner can also influence the microbiome.

Couples living together may share 13% to 30% of their gut bacteria. This was true even when diet (which many couples share) was factored out.
Research also shows that couples who live together have greater microbial diversity compared to people who live alone.

This is good news for couples who co-habitate, as a more diverse gut microbiome is correlated with lower risk of irritable bowel syndrome, cardiovascular diseases and potentially high blood sugar.

Advertisement

But it might not all be good news. Research shows that some of the bacterial species couples share can have varying effects on health.

Take the bacteria from the Ruminococcus family. While some species of Ruminoccocus benefit health, others have been linked to negative health outcomes, including diabetes and irritable bowel syndrome.

So these bacteria may not always offer the same benefits in different demographics. This highlights the complexity of resident gut bacteria and their health impacts.

Oral microbiome

Sharing an oral microbiome with our partners might seem obvious considering we regularly exchange saliva when we kiss. A ten-second kiss alone can exchange up to 80 million bacteria. The more kisses a couple shares, the more shared salivary bacteria they will have.

Advertisement

Although most of these bacteria will quickly pass through our mouth and into our gut when we swallow saliva, research show that couples actually share many of the same longer-term tongue microbes that form the foundation of the oral microbiome. Research even suggests that 38% of the oral microbiome is shared in couples living together – compared to only 3% in couples who don’t live together.

Sharing this proportion of your oral microbiome could have many potential health effects.

A healthy oral microbiome is important for protecting against tooth decay and it has anti-inflammatory properties. Some researchers also suggest the oral microbiome’s health effects may extend as far as the gut and nervous system.

But some of the bacteria that couples tend to share may also have potentially harmful health effects.

Advertisement

Couples are more likely to have similar numbers of the bacteria Neisseria in their gut compared to single people. Neisseria can reside in the mouth for long periods of without causing disease.

Some types of Neisseria can be harmful, while others are helpful.
Tatiana Shepeleva/ Shutterstock

Some Neisseria bacteria can be harmful and may cause meningitis. Yet some Neisseria bacteria actually fight against these meningitis-causing species, stopping them from overgrowing and causing harm.

So while you may want to avoid kissing someone when they’re poorly for obvious reasons, it turns out that a kiss even when you’re healthy can transfer all sorts of bacteria between the two of you.

More research is needed to really understand what overall effect sharing these bacteria with your partner has on health.

Advertisement

Skin microbiome

The skin microbiome is the most unique and personalised microbiome, tailored to each person. It’s even sometimes referred to as our microbial fingerprint.

Being the most exposed microbiome, the skin microbiome has evolved to be adaptable to external factors such as the climate and cosmetic products. No matter what, these bacteria work hard to remain at an equilibrium.

Close contact with our partners – and even pets – has a huge influence on what bacteria live on our skin. After comparing the gut and oral microbiome, researchers found the skin microbiome to be the most similar among couples.

It isn’t just the bacteria on your arms or hands that are shared, either. Research shows that couples shared 35% of the bacteria living on their feet, and around 17.5% of the bacteria on their eyelids.

Advertisement

You may not even need to touch your partner to have the same skin bacteria as them. Factors such as sleeping in the same bed and walking on similar surfaces are thought to explain why such a large proportion of our skin microbiome is similar.

This is because humans naturally shed bacteria in a similar way as dogs shed fur. We leave traces of our bacteria on everything we touch – and we also easily pick up bacteria from our environments.

The shared effect of living together on the skin microbiome is so great that researchers were able to use computer models to accurately predict 86% of cohabiting couples based off of their individual bacterial samples alone.

But while it’s clear that couples share much of the same skin microbiome, the health effect that this has is not currently known.

Advertisement

While sharing bacteria with your partner may sound alarming, there’s often no cause for concern. Bacteria teach our bodies how to fight infections, they help us digest foods and even produce key nutrients. The bacteria we share with our partners are often harmless and sometimes benefit our health rather than hindering it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Former Miami congressman goes on trial over secret Venezuela lobbying

Published

on

Former Miami congressman goes on trial over secret Venezuela lobbying

MIAMI (AP) — The federal trial of a former Miami congressman accused of secretly lobbying for Venezuela’s government during the first Trump administration begins Monday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio set to testify over his interactions with his old friend.

Prosecutors allege David Rivera was a hired gun for former President Nicolás Maduro, leveraging Republican connections from his time in Congress to push the White House to abandon its hard line on Venezuela’s socialist government.

Rivera, who at one time had been Rubio’s roommate in Florida, allegedly persuaded then Foreign Minister Delcy Rodríguez — now Venezuela’s acting president — to award him a $50 million lobbying contract to be paid by state oil company PDVSA. As part of the alleged foreign influence campaign, prosecutors say Rivera was aided by Texas Republican Rep. Pete Sessions and a convicted Cali cartel associate as he sought meetings with the White House and Exxon Mobil on Maduro’s behalf.

The trial offers a rare glimpse into the often unseemly role Miami — long a haven for exiles, corruption and anti-communist crusaders — plays in shaping U.S. policy in Latin America. As such, it is perhaps fitting that Rubio, Miami’s most prominent politician, is set to take the stand Tuesday about his meetings with Rivera while the former congressman and an associate were allegedly helping Maduro mount a charm offensive in Washington.

Advertisement

Also likely to face scrutiny is Rodríguez, who relied on Rivera to set up meetings in New York, Caracas, Washington and Dallas in a bid to build U.S. support for normalizing relations with Venezuela — an effort that failed at the time but now appears within reach, albeit on unequal terms, following Maduro’s ouster and the ascent of his more pragmatic aide.

“This case is about two things: greed and betrayal,” prosecutor Roger Cruz said in his opening statement Monday. “The evidence will show that for $50 million these two defendants made a pact to secretly lobby for Nicolás Maduro, the communist director, and his second in command Delcy Rodriguez.”

Indictment details alleged covert lobbying and money-laundering scheme

An 11-count indictment, unsealed in 2022, charges Rivera and Miami political consultant Esther Nuhfer with money laundering and failing to register as a foreign agent.

Prosecutors allege that to hide their work, Rivera set up an encrypted chat group called MIA — for Miami — with his main conduit to the Maduro government: Venezuelan media tycoon Raúl Gorrín, who was subsequently charged in the U.S. with bribing top Venezuelan officials.

Advertisement

Members of the group used playful code words to discuss their activities: Maduro was the “bus driver,” Sessions “Sombrero,” and millions of dollars “melons,” according to prosecutors.

Rivera, 60, denies wrongdoing. His attorneys counter that his one-man firm, Interamerican Consulting, was hired by an American subsidiary of Venezuela’s state-owned oil company — not PDVSA itself — and therefore did not need to register as a foreign agent.

His consulting work, they say, was focused on positioning Venezuelan-owned Citgo in the U.S. energy industry and was wholly distinct from his peacemaking efforts, which involved working with Maduro’s opponents to usher in leadership less hostile to the U.S.

But plaintiffs in a parallel civil case accuse Rivera of doing little of the promised work and using the contract as cover for illegal lobbying. Of the roughly $20 million he received, $3.75 million went to a South Florida company that maintained Gorrín’s luxury yacht.

Advertisement

‘No turkey’ without Rubio

Rubio’s expected testimony is highly unusual — not since Labor Secretary Raymond Donovan testified at a mafia trial in 1983 has a sitting member of the president’s Cabinet taken the stand in a criminal trial.

While Rubio isn’t charged and there’s no indication in the indictment that he acted improperly as a senator at the time, prosecutors say Rivera viewed him as a key ally in his outreach to the White House. For Rubio, prosecutors said in a pre-trial hearing last week, contact with Gorrín offered a backchannel to Caracas at a time U.S. authorities had detected a possible death threat against him from Venezuelan socialist party boss Diosdado Cabello.

Rivera and Rubio met at the senator’s Washington home on July 9, 2017, according to the indictment. Rivera, the indictment says, told Rubio that he was working with Gorrín, who had persuaded Maduro to accept a deal in which he would hold free and fair elections.

“Remember, U.S. should facilitate, not just support, a negotiated solution,” Rivera texted Rubio two days later as the senator was set to meet Trump, the indictment says. “No vengeance, reconciliation.”

Advertisement

Following a second meeting between Rubio, Rivera, Gorrín and others, Rivera remarked in the chat that the bus driver — Maduro — would have to pay him for setting up the meeting with Rubio. Without the senator’s support, Rivera said, there would be “no turkey,” he wrote.

The outreach quickly unraveled, however. Later that month, Trump sanctioned Maduro and labeled him a “dictator,” launching a “maximum pressure” campaign to unseat the president. Rubio took to the Venezuelan airwaves to press the White House’s agenda.

“For Nicolás Maduro, who I am sure is watching, the current path you are on will not end well for you,” Rubio said July 31, 2017, in a rare 10-minute address to the Venezuelan people that aired on Gorrín’s network.

The State Department declined to comment.

Advertisement

Outreach to Exxon for Rodríguez

After the contract was signed, Rivera and Gorrín arranged a meeting in New York City between Rodríguez, then foreign minister and a PDVSA board member, and Sessions, whose Dallas-area district included Exxon’s headquarters.

Later, Sessions tried to broker a meeting for Rodríguez with Darren Woods, who had succeeded Trump’s then Secretary of State Rex Tillerson as CEO of Exxon. Rodríguez was looking to resolve a long-running investment dispute and lure Exxon back to Venezuela in order to revive the OPEC nation’s collapsing oil industry. The meeting never happened as Exxon rebuffed the outreach.

Almost a year after helping Rivera make inroads with Exxon, Sessions secretly traveled to Caracas for a meeting with Maduro arranged by Gorrín and Rivera, the indictment says. As part of the effort, Sessions also agreed to deliver a letter from the Venezuelan president to Trump.

The defense team also wanted Maduro and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles to testify. Maduro, through a lawyer, said he would invoke his constitutional right to remain silent if compelled, while prosecutors successfully quashed an attempt to subpoena Wiles, who was a registered lobbyist for Gorrín’s Globovision network at the same time the media magnate was working with Rivera.

Advertisement

Before being elected to Congress in 2010, Rivera was a high-ranking Florida legislator. During that time he shared a Tallahassee home with Rubio, who eventually became Florida House speaker.

Rivera has previously faced controversy, including allegations he secretly funded a Democratic spoiler candidate in a 2012 congressional race. Last year, federal prosecutors dropped the case after an appeals court threw out a sizable fine imposed by a lower court. Rivera was also investigated — but never charged — for campaign finance violations and a $1 million contract with a gambling company while serving in the Florida legislature.

Rivera has denied any wrongdoing and said both investigations were politically motivated.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Channel 4 fans are utterly flummoxed after 33-year-old reveals he’s a grandad

Published

on

Channel 4 fans are utterly flummoxed after 33-year-old reveals he's a grandad

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

A Channel 4 reality show contestant, 33, has shocked viewers after revealing he is a grandfather. Yes, you read that correctly.

Advertisement

The new series, The Hunt: Prey Vs Predator, drops a group of 10 into the ‘vast, unforgiving forest’ where they are pitted against one another in a game of ‘cat and mouse’ all for the prize of £100k.

During introductions among our group of adventurers, ex-military man-turned-dentist Nathan revealed he was a ‘father of six’, which was already a shock to his co-stars, including prison officer Marc.

Nathan, married to his wife Carly, then casually added: ‘And a grandfather of one’, although he quickly caveated that ‘we don’t use the word grandad because it’s really uncool, so we use Papa’.

In a separate chat to the camera, he joked: ‘Life is always on the go. This is a break, this is a holiday.’

Advertisement

Nonetheless, the grandfather revelation left fans gobsmacked.

The Hunt star Nathan, 33, has dropped a shocking fact about his family life (Picture: Channel 4)

‘He’s 33 and he’s a grandad!?,’ X user Tom James Clark wrote.

‘Surprised no one had follow-up questions for Nathan being a grandad at 33!?,’ MishyMoo added.

‘Nathan. A grandad, at 33?!!!’ Millie echoed.

Advertisement

Shedding more light into his hectic life, he shared ahead of the series premiere: ‘Me and my wife run a casting agency and two private drama schools. Life’s busy. I’m a normal lad from the north and I’m just up for a bit of a laugh.’

Discussing what motivated him to sign up for the show, he said: ‘I really want to do this to prove to myself that I can.

A still of The Hunt: Predator vs Prey cast
Ten contestants must prove they are the ultimate predator (Picture: Channel 4

The Hunt review

Metro contributor Adam Miller shares his three-star review of the show…

Channel 4’s The Hunt: Prey vs Predator is the first reality series I’ve seen in this tedious post-Traitors era that actually feels like it’s carving out its own lane – harking back to a time before we collectively decided that Claudia Winkleman gliding around a Scottish castle with three cloaked murderers was the absolute peak of British television.

The show has been described as ‘as savage as The Hunger Games’… minus the slaughter. Personally, that doesn’t quite do The Hunt justice.

Advertisement

Instead, it feels like a welcome throwback to the golden age of competition TV in the 2010s – blending Phillip Schofield’s one genuinely brilliant contribution to broadcasting, The Cube, with Channel 4’s criminally underrated surveillance thriller Hunted.

Read full review here.

Advertisement
A still from The Hunt: Prey vs Predator
The show is the ultimate survival strategy game (Picture: Channel 4/ Pete Dadds)

‘I’ve got a condition called FND [Functional Neurological Disorder], which means that I have seizures and I also get weakness in my left-hand side, so it’s a personal challenge to see whether I can still get up and run around a forest.’

In order to win, he’ll have to be the last one standing after a cutthroat game of ‘action-packed hunts’, and ever-shifting allegiances.

More generally, fans have gotten behind the strategy-based new show.

‘Between this and handcuffed, Channel 4 is kind of bringing back good reality competition shows,’ luke praised.

‘I really enjoyed tonight’s The Hunt prey vs predator premiere, like the format of this new game,’ Darrennpassey agreed.

Advertisement

The Hunt: Prey vs Predator airs tonight at 9pm on Channel 4.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

MOMA Foods recalls porridge items due to mouse contamination

Published

on

MOMA Foods recalls porridge items due to mouse contamination

MOMA Foods is recalling various porridge pots and sachet products because of possible mouse contamination at the manufacturing site, making them “unsafe to eat”.

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has warned consumers “do not eat” the affected products and instead return them to the store where they were purchased for a full refund.

Full list of MOMA Foods porridge products being recalled

The nine MOMA Foods porridge products included in the recall, according to its website and the FSA, are:

  • MOMA Almond Butter & Salted Caramel Porridge Pot 55g (1pk, 8pk and 12pk) – M5296, M5297, M5303, M5304, M5315, M5339, M5342 (batch codes)
  • MOMA Apple, Cinnamon & Brown Sugar Porridge Pot 65g (1pk and 8pk) – M5261, M5328, M5329, M6026, M6027
  • MOMA Banana & Peanut Butter Protein Porridge Pot 65g (1pk and 8pk) – M5248, M5251, M5304, M5307
  • MOMA Blueberry & Vanilla Porridge Pot 65g (1pk and 8pk) – M5283, M5284, M5285, M5335, M5336, M6027, M6028
  • MOMA Cranberry & Raisin Porridge Pot 70g (1pk, 8pk and 12pk) – M5293, M5294, M5295, M5321, M5322, M5329, M5330, M5331
  • MOMA Golden Syrup Porridge Pot 70g (1pk, 8pk and 12pk) – M5241, M5244, M5245, M5261, M5293, M5311, M5314, M5346, M5349
  • MOMA Plain No-Added Sugar Porridge Pot 65g (1pk and 12pk) – M5279, M5280, M5281, M5308, M5309, M5310, M5311, M5345,
  • MOMA Almond Butter & Salted Caramel Porridge Sachets 7x40g (1pk and 5pk) – M5289, M5290
  • MOMA Apple, Cinnamon & Brown Sugar Porridge Sachets 6x40g (1pk and 5pk) – M5293, M5294, M5295

MOMA Foods added: “Even though the chance of contamination of any of the above products being affected is low, we have taken this precautionary step to ensure the safety of our consumers.”

The company confirmed that no other products are affected.

MOMA Foods and FSA issue “do not eat” warning

Both MOMA Foods and the FSA have both warned consumers “do not eat” the nine porridge products mentioned in the recall.

MOMA Foods said: “Any consumers who have purchased affected MOMA porridge products are asked not to consume them.

Advertisement

“Instead, they should return the products to the store where they were purchased and a full refund will be issued.”



Shoppers can also email getintouch@momafoods.co.uk for more information.

The FSA added: “Point of sale notices will be displayed in all retail stores that are selling these products and on their website.

“These notices explain to customers why the products are being recalled and tell them what to do if they have bought the products.”

Advertisement

RECOMMENDED READING:


What is a product recall?

If a food product has a problem that makes it unsellable, it may be ‘withdrawn’ (taken off the shelves) or ‘recalled’ (when customers are asked to return the product).

The FSA issues Product Withdrawal Information Notices and Product Recall Information Notices to inform consumers and local authorities about food safety issues.

In some cases, a ‘Food Alert for Action’ is issued.

Advertisement

This provides local authorities with details of specific actions to be taken on behalf of consumers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

AAPI adults broadly opposed to Trump immigration approach: new poll

Published

on

AAPI adults broadly opposed to Trump immigration approach: new poll

WASHINGTON (AP) — Most Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders believe President Donald Trump has done more harm than good on the issue of immigration and border security in his second term so far, according to a new AAPI Data/AP-NORC poll.

About 6 in 10 AAPI adults say Trump has hurt immigration and border security “a lot” or “a little,” according to the survey from AAPI Data and The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, compared with about 4 in 10 U.S. adults in a January AP-NORC survey. About two-thirds of AAPI adults — who are generally more likely to be Democrats than U.S. adults overall — also say Trump has “gone too far” when it comes to deporting immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, compared with about half of Americans in general.

Trump’s administration has instituted sweeping immigration measures since he took office, but the past two months have been especially tumultuous. This past January, Trump suspended processing immigrant visas for citizens of 75 countries. Arrests at the U.S.-Mexico border have fallen dramatically, but the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests and detentions have soared. In December 2024, daily detentions averaged just under 40,000. Last month, they numbered about 70,000.

The survey was conducted on the heels of the January fatal shootings by ICE agents of two U.S. citizens and their detainment of a Hmong American man — clad only in his underwear — in freezing temperatures.

Advertisement

These immigration crackdowns hit close to home for Jeff Ugai, who lives in Hawaii. On his island, Kauai, nearly four dozen people were arrested in November in immigration raids.

“It seems like the current administration’s efforts have been more almost about cruelty than they have about actually establishing an immigration system that makes sense to this country,” said Ugai, 39, who is a Democrat.

Most AAPI adults believe Trump has crossed a line with deportations

AAPI adults, one of the fastest-growing demographics in the U.S., broadly don’t support Trump’s tough tactics on immigration, the poll found. A separate AAPI Data/AP-NORC survey last fall found that unhappiness about Trump’s immigration approach had risen from earlier in the year.

“We’re also seeing opposition to policies that may not involve violence or violations of due process, but still involve things like banning immigrants from entire countries where there is a history of visa overstays or deporting immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens,” said Karthick Ramakrishnan, founder and executive director of AAPI Data.

Advertisement

In this poll, around 4 in 10 AAPI adults say deporting immigrants living in the U.S. illegally should be a low priority for the U.S. government, an increase from about one-third just after Trump took office. About one-third of AAPI adults now say these deportations should be a moderate priority, and only about 2 in 10 say they should be a high priority.

Fran Peace, 75, of Oroville, California, still sees deporting immigrants here illegally as a high priority. But the Japanese American retiree disagrees with stopping people based on “stereotypes” like their looks or if they have an accent. She also is open to a citizenship path for those who’ve lived here for years and haven’t committed a crime.

“I don’t think you should just have to go back automatically, but the laws don’t say that,” Peace said. “If you’re illegal you go back. But I think there should be some concession made for the people that have been here a long time.”

Most AAPI adults are unhappy with immigration enforcement tactics

Most AAPI adults, 73%, have a “somewhat” or “very” unfavorable opinion of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE.

Advertisement

AAPI Republicans have a much less negative view of the agency than AAPI adults overall, with only about one-third saying they view ICE negatively. But only about one-quarter of Republicans overall had an unfavorable opinion of ICE in a February AP-NORC survey.

There’s also widespread opposition to several hardline immigration policies, with about 6 in 10 saying they oppose large-scale immigration enforcement operations in neighborhoods with high populations of immigrants, and about 7 in 10 against allowing immigration enforcement agents to cover their faces when arresting people.

Prohibiting face coverings would be like body cameras, “helping keep people accountable,” Ugai said.

AAPI adults divided over whether illegal immigration threatens US workers, welfare

The AAPI adult population is split on whether immigrants here illegally have a large impact on social welfare resources and crime. About 4 in 10 AAPI adults think immigrants in the U.S. illegally pose a “major risk” of burdening welfare and safety net programs. A similar share see this as “a minor risk.” Only about one-quarter see “not a risk at all.”

Advertisement

On the question of whether immigrants here illegally will commit crimes, about one-third of AAPI adults see this as a “major risk,” while about half think it’s a “minor risk.” Only 15% say it’s “not a risk at all.”

Peace credits Trump with driving down crime like drug trafficking because before his second term, the U.S. “practically had open borders.”

But Daniel Kim, 65, of Las Cruces, New Mexico, thinks that immigrants pose little risk in terms of crime.

A Democrat and Korean American, he previously volunteered at a church to assist refugees with food and donations. He stopped going to his own evangelical church over church leaders’ insistence on remaining apolitical.

Advertisement

“The church leadership just could not make the connection or could not find it in their hearts to think (about) the issues involved with the treatment of foreigners in our country,” Kim said.

___

The poll of 1,197 U.S. adults who are Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders was conducted Feb. 2-9, 2026, using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based Amplify AAPI Panel, designed to be representative of the Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 4.6 percentage points.

This poll is part of an ongoing project exploring the views of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders, which are usually not highlighted in other surveys because of small sample sizes and lack of linguistic representation.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What does Cobra mean as Keir Starmer to chair new Cobra meeting today | News UK

Published

on

What does Cobra mean as Keir Starmer to chair new Cobra meeting today | News UK
The meetings take their name from a room in the Cabinet Office headquarters on Whitehall in London (Picture: EPA)

When there’s a major crisis in the UK, you may hear the name Cobra being mentioned in the news.

It sounds very ominous – and to a large extent it is, when you find out more about why Cobra meetings are held.

They’re essentially emergency briefings which are called when there’s a national or regional crisis, or during events abroad with major implications for the UK.

The name comes from where these meetings are held – in the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms, which can be abbreviated to COBR.

Advertisement

You might be able to tell where this is going – one of the rooms is designated the letter A, leading to the handy acronym Cobra.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Start your day informed with Metro’s News Updates newsletter or get Breaking News alerts the moment it happens.

Advertisement

The rooms are located at 70 Whitehall, which is the Cabinet Office main headquarters just behind 10 Downing Street.

There has only been one – rather blurry – photo released of Briefing Room A, which was sent out after a Freedom of Information Request in 2010.

A glimpse inside the room (Picture: Wikimedia Commons)

Those involved in briefings can include security and intelligence officials, civil servants, military chiefs, senior government ministers and leaders of emergency services, depending on what sort of crisis has taken place.

The Prime Minister will usually chair Cobra meetings, especially if the crisis at hand is more severe. However, this isn’t necessary, and another person can be nominated to chair.

It is roughly equivalent to the White House Situation Room, which became famous during the operation to kill Osama Bin Laden in 2011.

Advertisement

A meeting was first called to respond to the miners’ strike of 1972, and has since covered events including 7/7, the Paris attacks, the 2017 Westminster attacks, and the Covid pandemic.

19/03/2026. London, United Kingdom. Prime Minister Keir Starmer holds a call with Emmanuel Macron, President of France and Mark Rutte, Secretary General of NATO in 10 Downing Street. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street
Keir Starmer typically joins officials and ministers at the meetings (Picture: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Str)

Among the more recent Cobra meetings was prompted by the Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear sites last year, which led to the so-called Twelve-Day War.

Iran was to be the focus of a Cobra meeting again today, with Keir Starmer gathering ministers and officials to discuss the conflict in the Middle East.

Measures to keep fuel prices affordable and avoid an escalation in the cost-of-living crisis would likely be discussed.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

Advertisement

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Moment baby killers arrested for murdering 13-week-old son after lying 999 call

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Klevi and Nivalda Pirjani were jailed for life after murdering their tiny son Miguel Pirjani in November 2024 after being “systematically abused” by his parents

This is the harrowing moment a couple were arrested after murdering their 13-week-old baby.

Advertisement

Klevi and Nivalda Pirjani were jailed for life after murdering their tiny son Miguel Pirjani in November 2024 after being “systematically abused” by his parents. Police have now revealed shocking bodycam footage showing the sick parents’ attempts to feign ignorance over the murder.

The video also included the 999 emergency call, where it was revealed the baby had stopped breathing, and had already starting turning a different colour. Mum Nivalda Pirjani tried to appear confused when police told her the baby had a fractured skull, whereas dad Klevi burst into tears on the floor.

Little Miguel was left with numerous broken bones and a bleed on the brain, after being subjected to repeated assaults during his short life. The husband and wife later blamed one another for his death, with the mum claiming the dad had “lost control” before headbutting and kicking their son.

READ MORE: Baby killer claims her freedom is being blocked – because she refuses to admit her guiltREAD MORE: Heartbreaking moment woman weeps over body of Brit drowned on dream holiday

Both were sentenced to life in prison earlier today at Liverpool Crown Court. Nivaldi Pirjani was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of at least 15 years and three months behind bars.

Klevi was told he must serve at least 19 years before having any chance of release. He appeared to be wiping away tears as he learned his fate, closing his eyes and hanging his head at one stage before taking of his glasses and rubbing his eyes.

Advertisement

Nivalda meanwhile showed no reaction, sitting with her arms folded as she was jailed for life. Klevi also looked to his left towards his wife at once stage before he was taken down to the cells, while she remained facing forwards.

Sentencing, Mr Justice Baker, the High Court judge who presided over their trial, told them: “The best of medical science could not save Miguel Pirjani. He died from the irreversible effects of severe trauma to the head and neck.

“Migel was 13-and-a-half weeks old when he died. You were his parents, and you killed him by what must have been an act of appalling violence, intending him to suffer really serious harm. It is possible that you intended to kill him to be rid of him, but I am not sure that was your intention.

“I am sure that the fatal trauma Miguel suffered involved a heavy blow or series of blows to the right side of his head. Precisely how that was inflicted, I cannot say. Whether there was a single blow to head or several, I cannot say.

Advertisement

“Whether Miguel’s head was battered onto a hard surface or some blunt object was battered onto his head, I cannot say. I cannot even say which of you did that. I think it is more probable that it was you Klevi.

“I cannot say precisely when or how Miguel was fatally battered or even be sure about which of you fatally battered him. Only you two know. You have chosen not to tell anyone. What exactly happened to Miguel that morning remains the guilty secret of a warped relationship where you came first to one another. The interest of Team Klevi and Nivalda came first.

“The jury were sure it was encouraged by the other of you, both of you intending Miguel to suffer at least grievous bodily harm. The fatal assault was not a one off incident that came out of the blue.

Advertisement

“There must have been an escalation in the violence against Miguel in the final few days, culminating in the assault on the 24th of November. It did not matter which of you launched the final fatal assault. You were in this together, encouraging each other and intending that defenceless infant boy to suffer really serious harm.

“It was an abuse of power and gross abuse of trust of the bond between a baby and parents. I consider there to be no mitigation available to you Klevi. I acknowledge the difficult start you had in life, affected by armed conflict and the deaths of your father and young sister. However, I do not believe that offers any reason to reduce the sentence.

“In your case Nivalda, you were of previous good character. You were suffering from post natal depression and estranged from your own family.

Advertisement

You have shown a measure of remorse through your parting words to Miguel and through some of what you said to the jury. That is rendered a little shallow by your determination to fight your trial, which extended to trying to limit your criminal responsibility.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

UK wholesale servicing Morrisons shuts down amid liquidation

Published

on

UK wholesale servicing Morrisons shuts down amid liquidation

Localist – The Food Merchant, based in East Kilbride, launched in 1994 (as Food From Scotland Ltd) with the aim of helping independent food businesses in Scotland grow.

Over the years, the company has expanded and begun helping local food suppliers across the UK get their products to major retailers, including Morrisons, Co-op, and Waitrose, and food services.

Localist delivered 4,000 products per week to more than 2,500 retail stores and 1,000 contract catering units, according to The Grocer.

Co-op was one of the major retailers Localist – The Food Merchant used to provide products to. (Image: PA)

The company changed its name to Enterprise Foods Ltd in 2001, before rebranding again in 2025 to Localist – The Food Merchant.

Advertisement

Localist – The Food Merchant shuts down after entering liquidation

Now, after 32 years, Localist – The Food Merchant has ceased trading after entering liquidation, according to Companies House.

The closure of the wholesaler has resulted in the loss of 71 jobs.

George Lafferty of BTG was appointed liquidator by Hamilton Sheriff Court on March 18.



Managing partner of BTG in Scotland and Northern Ireland, Thomas McKay, speaking to the Glasgow Times, said: “The directors had made efforts to restructure the debt of the company in order to save the business and rescue the jobs, and the loss of the jobs was sadly inevitable when this was not successful.

Advertisement

“There are many small suppliers to the business that are owed money, and the loss of this route to market will also have a serious knock-on effect on these food producers as well. 

“We are working to assess all claims and establish whether there will be any dividend paid to unsecured creditors, but it is not likely to be significant, given the level of secured debts in the business.

“Regrettably, the failure of the company has resulted in 71 redundancies and we are working closely with those affected to help them access the financial entitlements and support available to them, including assistance from Partnership Action for Continuing Employment (PACE) and the Redundancy Payments Service.

“Our priorities now include ensuring these employees receive the guidance and advice they need during this process, and that we maximise the return from the sale of assets to the benefit of creditors.”

Advertisement

Turbulent start to 2026 for UK high street

It has been a rough start to 2026 for the UK high street, with several retailers entering administration and others announcing widespread store closures.

Major high street retailers, including River Island, Primark, and Poundland, have already been forced to close stores in 2026, while Revolution and BrewDog have shut the doors to 21 and 38 pubs, respectively.



Several other retailers have fallen into administration recently, including:

Advertisement

Meanwhile, four UK travel companies have closed in the opening weeks of 2026:

EcoJet Airlines, billed as “the world’s first Electric Airline”, has also entered liquidation after just three years, resulting in the cancellation of all planned flights.



UK delivery company Yodel is set to be phased out over the coming months after being acquired by InPost.

Advertisement

Tesco also recently revealed plans to cut 380 jobs in stores across the UK, while it’s been reported that Morrisons is looking to sell some of its in-store pharmacies as it continues to cut costs.

It’s not been all bad news for the UK high street, with several major brands announcing new store openings for 2026, including Aldi, M&S, and Superdrug.

Which of these recent insolvencies or closures has affected you the most? Let us know in the comments below.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Prem Rugby: Finn Russell prevails, Marcus Smith toils and Leicester tear it up

Published

on

Marcus Smith, Finn Russell and Izaia Perese

Bonus points caught some flak at the end of the Six Nations.

Had champions France drawn their high-scoring game against England in the final round, rather than winning it by one point, they would have finished top of the standings despite having won one fewer match than second-placed Ireland.

However, the concept came good at the end of Leicester’s win over Bristol on Sunday.

With the clock in the red, Leicester 28-19 up and each team having scored three tries, the Bears were attacking hard deep inside the host’s half.

Advertisement

Bristol couldn’t win the game, but a try would deliver them two bonus points and keep them within one of Leicester in the table and the race for a top-four finish.

When replacement Tigers’ hooker Finn Theobald-Thomas turned over the ball, it seemed Leicester would take the money and kick to touch.

Their coach Geoff Parling certainly thought so.

“Could you not hear me at the end? I wanted us to kick it off,” he said later.

Advertisement

Instead, despite the rest of the backline standing flat and fatigued and the left-hand touchline invitingly close, Izaia Perese flung a long pass the other way.

Freddie Steward caught it, kicked a pinpoint bomb across to Billy Searle, who fed inside to Gabriel Hamer-Webb to streak in to secure Leicester’s own four-try bonus.

It was a sensational finish.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Four problems Liam Rosenior must fix at Chelsea as pressure builds after Everton defeat

Published

on

Four problems Liam Rosenior must fix at Chelsea as pressure builds after Everton defeat

The international break arrives at a good time for Chelsea.

This is their worst slump of a disappointing season, with four straight defeats in all competitions seeing the Blues knocked out of the Champions League and damaging their hopes of making it back into the competition next season.

Here, Standard Sport assesses four problems Rosenior needs to fix if Chelsea are to make a success of their difficult seven-game run-in and qualify for the Champions League.

Cut out individual errors

Advertisement

When Rosenior spoke in his post-match press conference at Everton and talked of “lapses in concentration” happening “too many times recently”, he was referring to the unforced errors that have dogged Chelsea for weeks.

It has been a period full of individual mistakes. Filip Jorgensen’s errors against Paris Saint-Germain in the first leg, Mamadou Sarr’s slip-up in the second, Robert Sanchez’s howler at Everton – errors are a part of football but rotten moments have been all too common for Chelsea of late. They have contributed to their form nosediving.

Robert Sanchez made another mistake at Everton

AFP via Getty Images

There is not a great deal the head coach can do to prevent more of them. Instead, players must take personal responsibility and maintaining in-game focus is a must. Huge games await Chelsea and they cannot afford to keep being punished from their own unforced errors.

Advertisement

This is something Chelsea absolutely must improve if they are to finish in the top four or five.

Their four defeats on the bounce against PSG (twice), Newcastle and Everton have come with an aggregate score of 12-2 to their opponents, and yet, incredibly, it is Chelsea who won those matches on aggregate on the xG metric.

While that implies positives about their ability to reach the final third and make chances, what it means for the quality of their finishing is damning.

Chelsea have slipped to sixth in the Premier League

Getty Images

Advertisement

For the first time since September 2023, Chelsea have now gone three consecutive games without finding the net, and they have lacked a cutting edge and a decisiveness in front of goal. Matvei Safonov in the PSG second leg and Jordan Pickford at the Hill Dickinson both put in outstanding performances, but it was up to Chelsea in both cases to be more ruthless and give the goalkeepers no chance.

The most damning statistic of all was doing the rounds in the aftermath of their battering at Everton and understandably commanded a mention on Match of the Day. Chelsea, it has been confirmed, have been outrun in every single Premier League game this season.

For a team hopeful of being back in Europe’s premier competition next season, that is such a poor look. It is a run that spans no fewer than 31 matches and the tenures of two head coaches, signifying something endemic within the team.

How can Chelsea expect to achieve want they wish to if they are being outfought by everyone they come up against, teams better than them and teams far worse? It feels reductive to suggest that a team must work harder, as if to simplify more complex issues. And yet for Chelsea it is clearly the case.

Advertisement

Improve defensive organisation

Rosenior has chopped and changed his back four (or three) for almost every game of his 19-match tenure, sometimes enforced by injury but often not.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025