Free family-friendly events featuring fireworks will be held at Wythenshawe Park, Heaton Park, and Platt Fields Park on Saturday, November 7.

The evening will include a reduced-noise, low-impact display at 5pm for families and SEND audiences, and a main display at 8pm.

Lantern-making workshops will also be held in the lead-up to the events, with lantern parades taking place before the 8pm fireworks shows.

This return follows the pause of major fireworks events in 2019 following the Covid-19 pandemic, when funding challenges spurred a change of direction.

As a result, the council shifted its focus to funding a range of community-focused events across the city’s parks during the autumn season, rather than the larger one-off fireworks events.

These community-focused events will continue and are set to expand further in local parks this year, particularly during the October half-term school holiday, offering a mix of themed activities.

With additional council investment, the fireworks events on November 7 will be a grand finale to the community activities happening across the city.

Councillor Garry Bridges, leader of Manchester City Council, said: “I’m delighted we’re keeping the Fireworks this year in Manchester.

“Residents tell us how important it is to create opportunities for our communities to come together and celebrate.

“Our fireworks display is exactly one of those events that bridge culture and background — and so it’s fantastic to bring back these free community displays that give families, friends and neighbours a shared experience — and without cost being a barrier.

“It is even more important that everyone feels welcome and able to participate, which is why we have designed our early evening display with inclusivity for families with young children and people with SEND as an essential element of the day and evening celebrations ensuring that no-one has to miss out on the fun.”

Councillor Basat Sheikh, Executive Member for Neighbourhoods, said: “We are delighted to announce and welcome the return of our much-loved fireworks celebrations.

“Our parks should be shared spaces that create opportunities for Manchester people to gather, which is why bringing back the fireworks displays was top of our agenda.

“And we also recognise the importance of community, which is why we will also continue to invest in a wide range of activities in our parks throughout the year.”

The trio appeared side by side in the dock at Dungannon Magistrates’ Court during a brief mention of that case on Wednesday

Three men have appeared in court in Dungannon charged in connection with a model of a mosque being placed on a Loyalist bonfire in Co Tyrone in July.

Tyler Somerville, 28, of Jacksonville Road in Moygashel, Simon Dilworth, 58, of a different address on Jacksonville Road and John Black, 38, of Prince Andrew Crescent in Moygashel all faced one charge in terms of offensive material.

The charge is that on July 8 2026 they displayed written material which was threatening, abusive or insulting, intending to stir up hatred or arouse fear contrary to Article 9(1) of the Public Order (Northern Ireland) Order 1987.

It came after a model of a mosque was on a bonfire in Moygashel, Co Tyrone in July as loyalist bonfires were being built across Northern Ireland to mark the anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne.

The trio appeared side by side in the dock at Dungannon Magistrates’ Court during a brief mention of that case on Wednesday morning.

All indicated they understood the charge.

A detective constable told the court he believed he could connect the accused to the charge.

No issues were raised during the first appearance of the three men with connection.

While all three had previously been out on police bail, they left under £250 court bail.

A fourth co-accused is set to appear on September 23, with all four to “travel together” going forward.

Meanwhile, Mr Somerville has been permitted to travel on a one-week holiday which had been booked before his arrest for the alleged offence.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

One officer told his colleague “I hope you get raped”

Two further officers have been sacked from the Metropolitan Police following a BBC Panorama undercover film exposing misconduct at Charing Cross station. This makes a total of 13 officers that have lost their jobs since an investigation was launched by the Independent Office for Police Conduct in October.

PC Mason O’Connor and PC Lloyd Hunter of the Central West Command Unit have both been sacked after “appalling” comments they made while off-duty as the investigation into the conduct at the station continues.

A hearing for PC O’Connor, was held on Tuesday, 15 September following allegations in a pub on October 2024 he said to a female colleague: “I hope you get raped on your way to Waterloo”.

The incident was reported after the Panorama episode aired in October 2025 that highlighted issues within the police station as officers were filmed calling for immigrants to be shot, boasting about excessive use of force and joking about rape and sexual assault.

The hearing found the allegation proven and that PC O’Connor breached standards of professional behaviour for authority, respect and courtesy, equality and diversity, and discreditable conduct, according to the Met Police. Don’t miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here

Allegations against PC Hunter were also made and proven at a hearing on August 27. During an off-duty drink in November 2024 he made comments that trivialised the use of force, suggested that he would enjoy using force on members of the public and that he “hated” homeless people.

Both officers have been sacked and will be added to the College of Policing’s barred list to prevent them re-joining policing or working for a number of other police-related bodies.

Commander Simon Messinger, Professionalism, said: “Two more officers have now been dismissed for their appalling comments and attitudes. I hope this sends a very clear message about the standards we expect from all our officers and the Met’s determination to improve our culture across the organisation.

“We continue to support the ongoing IOPC investigation.”

Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice

Staying trim, fit and healthy is no longer just determined by what you eat, as scientists are increasingly concerned with when you eat, too. 

A growing body of evidence suggests that eating the majority of calories as early as possible in the day could accelerate weight loss, lower blood pressure and keep you fuller for longer.

Last year, scientists from Slovenia found restricting meals to an 8am to 4pm window resulted in ten pounds weight loss over three months, as well as reduction in body fat and stabilisation of blood sugar levels. 

Critics say the effect is merely a result of fitting in fewer calories in a shorter space of time.

But is that really the extent of the benefit?

According to registered dietitian Sophie Medlin, there is reason to consider meal timings – and not just for those looking to lose weight. 

The body’s ability to utilise food depends on the interaction with our daily routine; that is, the time we wake up, sleep and exercise, she says. 

Here, she reveals the truth about the optimum time for breakfast, lunch and dinner – and the worst time to snack if you’re looking to shift extra pounds. 

Is eating earlier really better?

There’s no denying that research suggests eating more of our energy earlier in the day could produce some benefits for weight and heart health, says Ms Medlin. 

Perhaps the most in-depth study is a 2024 meta-analysis⁠ which found that earlier calorie distribution and time-restricted eating produced reductions in weight – albeit relatively small.

‘Our bodies run on approximately 24-hour circadian rhythms,’ says Ms Medlin. ‘These influence how good our body is at converting blood sugar to energy and digesting food, as well as the level of our appetite hormones.’

In general, the body is more efficient at converting sugars in food into energy – and therefore calories burned – during the most active part of the day.

‘Eating earlier gives us more opportunity to use energy through movement,’ she adds. 

One 2022 Harvard study asked 16 overweight and obese adults to stick to an early eating schedule for two weeks, and then pushed the meals back by four hours, but consuming the same calorie intake.

Early eaters ate one hour after waking – at around 8am, on average, – while the late eaters waited five hours, with some having their first meal as late as 12pm. 

Those in the early group ate dinner at around 4.30pm, compared to 8.30pm in the late group. 

Results showed that those on the later schedule had much higher blood levels of hormones associated with hunger, and lower levels of compounds released in response to fullness. 

The researchers concluded that eating later could trigger changes in the gut that increase hunger signals, risking weight gain.

Big names including Rishi Sunak, Jennifer Aniston and Hugh Jackman swear by fasting to keep their health and weight on track

However, Ms Medlin caveats: ‘This study is interesting but it only involved 16 adults. More conclusive evidence is needed to prove the theory.’ 

She admits, though, that delaying most of our food until late evening could disrupt appetite regulation, and make blood sugars go awry. 

What about skipping breakfast?

Intermittent fasting – which involves limiting calorie intake for a few days a week – remains popular among Britons. 

Most adherents follow a similar schedule: skipping breakfast and saving their calories for lunch and dinner, while cutting out the snacks.

A review on the diet plan published earlier this year suggested it could result in a body weight reduction of about 3 per cent (roughly five and a half pounds in an average man).

However, a wealth of other reviews have found that the benefits are likely just the result of eating fewer calories. 

Scientists have found similar weight loss with other low-calorie diets. And some research suggests skipping breakfast could cause you to overeat. 

One large observational study examining the dietary records of 23,488 American adults found that people who skipped both breakfast and lunch consumed, on average, about 187 more calories at dinner.

Another study involving almost 3,000 older adults found delaying the first meal of the day by even an hour was associated with an 11 per cent higher risk of death. 

‘Skipping breakfast risks a pattern whereby you eat very little throughout the day and then consume a large proportion of the day’s food late at night,’ says Ms Medlin.

‘This can encourage overeating, and large, rich meals close to bed may cause reflux, bloating or disturbed sleep.’

She adds that, as the body is less able to convert food to energy at night, excess calories are more likely to be stored as fat. 

Is there an optimum time for every meal?

According to Ms Medlin, there aren’t any specific timings that guarantee that we won’t overeat, become sluggish, or lose focus.

However, there are ‘useful windows’ to stick to which are based on the strongest scientific evidence. 

‘Breakfast could be eaten within around one to two hours of waking up, lunch approximately four to five hours later, and dinner ideally two to three hours before bed,’ says Ms Medlin.

‘For someone following a conventional sleep pattern, that might mean breakfast between 7am and 9am, lunch between 12pm and 2pm, and dinner between 6pm and 8pm.’

But most crucial is ensuring the hours before bed are not the ‘main eating period of the day’, she adds. 

‘Finishing a main meal approximately two to three hours before lying down is a sensible target. This provides time for digestion and can reduce reflux or discomfort.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has thanked party leaders for their support following the death of his father, Roy, on Monday.

All opposition leaders sent condolences to him as he cancelled engagements earlier this week.

Burnham had previously spoken about the fact his dad did not know he had become prime minister, due to his advanced Alzheimer’s.

Posting on social media, he thanked, external “everyone who has shared a kind message about my dad, particularly the leaders of the other parties”.

Burnham added: “My family and I have been helped though this difficult time by people’s warmth and compassion. It means a great deal to us and we wanted to say thank you.”

Speaking to journalists on his first day back at work on Wednesday, Burnham thanked all those who had sent “so many lovely messages” to him and his family.

“It’s hard and it will be hard for a little while but better to get back to the job,” he said.

“I also want to thank the leaders of the other parties, all of whom sent a message, and it shows there is decency in British politics still and that’s lovely to see, so thank you from us all, the whole family.

“But my dad would want me to be back out there bringing some of the changes that he always pushed me to make.”

He has described how his father, a former telephone engineer, had raised him with “laughter, love and support” alongside his mother Eileen in Culcheth, Cheshire.

In July, Burnham spoke about his father’s condition and said it had influenced his drive to reform adult social care in England.

The husband, a man in his 60s from Stockport, pleaded guilty to 60 charges

The trial of 12 men accused of sexual offences is expected to start next month after a husband admitted drugging and raping his wife over a 20-year period.

The husband, a man in his 60s from Stockport, pleaded guilty to 60 charges. His guilty pleas were entered on Monday (September 14).

He admitted charges of rape, assault by penetration, administering a substance with intent, sexual assault, attempted rape and sharing intimate photographs or film. The husband will no longer feature as a defendant in the trial.

Click here to hear the latest from Manchester’s courts in our newsletter

The Manchester Evening News and other media organisations are not naming the husband in order to protect the anonymity of his wife. The law entitles her to anonymity for life. A further 12 defendants are due to go on trial on October 5. They all deny sexual offences.

They are David Graves, 59, of Milton Avenue, Derbyshire; Robert Stewart, 70, of Sandpiper Drive, Stockport; Karl Lindsay, 56, of Wordsworth Drive, Taunton; Philip Wild, 58, of St Davids Road, Cheadle; Graham Brougham, 74, of Birtwistle Road, Rudheath; Northwich, Daniel Rayner, 42, of Sherwood Drive, Whitstable; Sean Peers, 38, of Sandwich Road, Eccles; Mohammed Sabir, 28, of no fixed address; Jordan Wallace, 31, of Hindsford Close; Wythenshawe, Alan Keelan, 42, of Foscarn Drive, Wythenshawe; Richard Townsend, 37, of Woodland Street, Heywood; and Jonathan Kirk, 43, of Telford Close, Macclesfield.

The jury were originally sworn in on September 4 and were recalled to court today (September 16) to be addressed by Judge Maurice Greene. He told jurors: “You were told amongst other things that the prosecution’s case concerns allegations of sexual offending by a number of men on a female.

“You were also told that 14 men have been identified to date and one of them was [the husband]. That is [the wife’s] husband.

“Some of you may have seen or heard on the news on Monday that a man from Stockport had pleaded guilty to drugging and raping his wife, and that he admitted multiple offences of rape, attempted rape, assault by penetration, sexual assault and administering a substance with intent.

“His identity is protected in the public domain to protect [his wife’s] identity. Of course the man who pleaded guilty was [the husband]. He will no longer be a defendant in this case.

“As a result of those pleas, there is work to be done by the parties in this case. You were also told that the case could not sit in any event in the week commencing September 28.

“That is still the case. What I am going to do is ask you to come back to this court on Monday October 5. On that date I anticipate the trial will commence.”

The judge said he hoped that the trial would conclude by December 18.

Proceeding.

The probe will cover the period of his 21-year membership of the party

The Ulster Unionist Party has launched an independent safeguarding review into Jeffrey Donaldson, covering the period of his 21-year membership of the party from 1982 to his resignation in December 2003.

The review has been commissioned by UUP leader Jon Burrows MLA and will be led by Anne Marks, an independent, trauma-informed safeguarding consultant with more than thirty years’ frontline experience in trauma and victim-survivor support. Anne Marks will be supported by an advisory group of independent victim advocates.

The UUP said the review will provide a “confidential, independent, and trauma-informed channel” for anyone with relevant information to come forward. This includes members of the public, former and current Ulster Unionist Party members, staff, constituency workers, elected representatives, volunteers, witnesses and confidants.

The party said it is “deliberately broad in scope”, and while Donaldson was convicted of offences against children, the probe will receive information concerning alleged sexual misconduct, harassment, coercive or controlling behaviour, bullying, misogyny, intimidation, exploitation, abuse of status or authority, retaliation, and other boundary violations involving adults.

Donaldson, 63, was convicted at Newry Crown Court earlier this year of 18 sex offences, including one count of rape, relating to the abuse of two women when they were children. The offences were committed between 1985 and 2008.

Where the law requires disclosure, the Independent Safeguarding Professional will refer information directly to the Police Service of Northern Ireland, without recourse to the Ulster Unionist Party.

The review will examine, among other matters, any concerns reported to the party during the 1982 to 2003 period, the response those concerns received, the extent to which Donaldson’s status and power affected that response, and what the party can learn to strengthen its safeguarding practice, standards and culture. Concerns raised about behaviour post-2003 will, with consent, be shared with the relevant review or body.

The UUP said the review has been shaped by consultation with a number of victims’ groups, whose expertise in supporting survivors of abuse has informed the process at every stage. This has included Men’s Advisory Project, Nexus NI, NI Survivor Council (NISC), Victim Support NI and Women’s Aid.

At the conclusion of the Review, the Independent Safeguarding Professional will author a report setting out her findings and recommendations. The Ulster Unionist Party said they have committed to publishing the report as far as is legally possible.

Ulster Unionist Party Leader Jon Burrows MLA said: “The conviction of Jeffrey Donaldson exposed one of the most serious breaches of trust in public life in Northern Ireland. My first thoughts, today as ever, are with the two women whose courage brought his crimes into the light.

“Jeffrey Donaldson was a member of the Ulster Unionist Party for 21 years, from 1982 to 2003. That fact carries an obligation. We owe it to the victims, and we owe it to the public, to establish honestly and independently whether there is anything the party should have known, should have acted upon or should have done differently during those years.

“That is what this Review is for. It is independent. It is led by one of the most experienced safeguarding professionals in Northern Ireland. It is confidential for anyone who comes forward, and it has a direct referral pathway to the police where the law requires. Whatever it finds, this party will act upon its findings.

“I want to say clearly to anyone with information, or with an experience they have carried, sometimes for many years: please come forward. Your voice will be heard, and you will be given all the support necessary.

“This review was designed in consultation with victims’ groups, whose expertise and honesty have shaped it. I am grateful to them, and to those they represent, for the work they have done alongside us to ensure this process can command confidence.

“The Ulster Unionist Party called on the UK Government for a full independent public inquiry into what was known about Jeffrey Donaldson throughout his public career. That inquiry has been declined.

“In its absence, we are determined to ensure that anyone affected by this man during his years in the Ulster Unionist Party has the opportunity to be heard, to have their experience properly examined and to help ensure the full truth is told. That is what this Review is for.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The father of a missing three-year-old boy has pleaded with the public to keep searching as he ‘cannot go another night knowing he’s out there alone’.

Local officials said at 5am that there had been no sightings of three–year–old Noah Woods, who is non-verbal and partially deaf, after he vanished from a playground in Suffolk yesterday.

Noah is believed to have run off from his grandfather out of the playground in the village of Brantham, disappearing down an alleyway at 3pm on Tuesday.

Residents have been urged to check their gardens, sheds and outbuildings, and those with CCTV or doorbell cameras have been asked to review the footage. 

This morning, police cordoned off a footpath beside the playground, while a helicopter hovered overhead and circled around the area. 

Hundreds of volunteers have also converged on the tiny village as the search enters its second day.

Posting to Facebook, Noah’s father Rhys Woods said the emergency services believe that his young son is no longer in the immediate areas around the playground where he disappeared.

He asked the public to ‘please don’t give up on him’ and to continue searching, telling them ‘he is out there somewhere’.

Noah, who is mildly autistic and unlikely to respond to his name being called, was described as white with curly ginger hair. He was wearing a t–shirt with cartoon character Bluey on it, shorts and white trainers when he went missing.

The alleyway he disappeared down leads to a new–build housing estate, a local pond and a railway line.  

‘We still have nothing, all the emergency services and all of you have shown how strong this community is, with people coming from far and wide also,’ Mr Woods wrote.

Members of the public turned out to help police as the search continues for Noah throughout the village of Brantham

Noah vanished after becoming separated from a relative in Merriam Close, Brantham, on Tuesday afternoon

Emergency services are searching the Brantham area in a bid to locate him, while residents have been urged to check their gardens, sheds and outbuildings

This morning, police cordoned off a footpath beside the playground, while a helicopter hovered overhead and circled around the area

Advertisement

‘The emergency services are very confident that the high risk areas (Decoy pond, railway lines) are all clear.

‘This means knowing our boy, he has gone even further, could I ask that all of you brilliant people out there today expand further if you are able to?

‘I cannot go another night knowing he’s out there alone, please don’t give up on him guys. He is out there somewhere and I appreciate every single one of you.’

Noah’s great uncle, Tony Malcolm, who was part of the search team, described him as ‘a lovely little kid’.

Volunteer searchers were briefed at the village hall this morning by parish clerk, Sarah Keys, who told them: ‘Please remember we are searching for a frightened three-year-old boy.’

Ms Keys said around 500 people had stayed up all night to carry on searching for Noah. 

The village hall stayed open during the night, and the council also printed out hundreds of maps for volunteers to use in their searches.

Ms Keys said: ‘There were about 1,000 people out at one point. I think local people are just feeling devastated. Everyone just wants to pull together and help.’

Police and Crime Commissioner for Suffolk Tim Passmore urged those joining the ongoing searches not to go out alone and to get direction from those organising the response.

Speaking to BBC Radio Suffolk, he said his ‘thoughts and prayers’ are with friends and family of Noah Woods.

He said: ‘As time goes by I really hope we can get some good news. I can’t think of anything worse than a poor little three-year-old lad going missing and not being found.’

Dozens of locals gathered at the village hall from 8.30am in the hope of getting a police briefing about where to search, but many decided to head off on their own before a senior officer arrived to talk to them.

Ms Keys told the crowd: ‘I know your feet are itching to go out and look for that little boy. We just want to find him.’

Around 200 locals who had arrived at the hall by around 9.30am were split into two groups with fitter people being allocated to search muddy tracks and fields while others were told to concentrate on the paved areas of the village.

Members of a search and rescue team continue their search near Merriam Close for Noah

Environment Agency officers join police officers as they continue their search for Noah

Noah’s father Rhys Woods (pictured) asked the public to ‘please don’t give up on him’ and to continue searching, telling them ‘he is out there somewhere’.

Advertisement

Yesterday, a Coastguard helicopter was seen circling the village, which is near the estuary of the River Stour.

And passengers on trains between Manningtree and Ipswich were told that their services would be run at a reduced speed because of the searches. 

Volunteers from Suffolk Lowland Search and Rescue used a boat to search Decoy Pond, the local beauty spot Noah was seen running towards.

Police dog units joined the search overnight, and thermal imaging cameras were deployed.

Just before midnight, volunteers who joined the hunt were told to go home for the night and rest, but many remained on the streets. 

In a Facebook post just after 5am on Wednesday, Brantham Parish Council said there had been no confirmed sightings of Noah.

‘The search for Noah continues this morning,’ the post said.

‘If you are able to help with the search today, please keep safe and take care of yourselves. 

‘Search in pairs where possible, wear high-vis clothing and take extra care around roads, water, woodland and other potentially dangerous areas. Please take a fully charged mobile phone with you.

‘Please also check your own property thoroughly, including gardens, sheds, garages, outbuildings, vehicles and under or behind furniture.

‘If the police ask you to move away from an area, please follow their instructions. This may be to allow specialist search activity to take place.’

Last night, Brantham Parish Council wrote on its Facebook page: ‘We have been completely overwhelmed by the support received from the Brantham community and from visitors from far and wide and our thanks go to the emergency services and all the volunteers who have joined the search so far.

‘The Village Hall will be open all night with toilet facilities and drinks if you need it. 

‘The emergency services will be continuing their search throughout the night.’

The search continues in darkness for three–year–old Noah, who disappeared in Brantham

Volunteers who joined the hunt have now been told to go home for the night and rest

Advertisement

One police officer manning the cordon last night urged the public to allow officers to get on with the job themselves. 

He told the Harwich and Manningtree Standard: ‘We have been given information and we want to search this bit with our teams now that we have got the teams here.

‘You’ve got dog units looking for any sort of tracks, and then we’ve got thermal imaging going throughout the wooded area.

‘At this time of night with this light, it’s harder for members of the public – we want to make sure we can do that with all of our equipment we’ve got. 

‘The more people we have got in there [in the woodland] the harder it is going to be for us, especially with scents – if there is a scent or a track or anything like that, we don’t want that to be changed in any way. 

‘If there are people in there, the thermal imaging is going to pick up them as opposed to obviously all of our goal to find the little man.’

Suffolk Police said anyone with information about Noah’s whereabouts should contact them. 

They said: ‘Police are appealing for help to locate a missing three–year–old boy in Brantham.

‘Noah was last seen at approximately 3pm [on] Tuesday 15 September, when he became separated from a relative after visiting the playground in Merriam Close.

‘Noah is reported to have run off down the alleyway beside the playground towards the new build housing estate.

‘Noah is described as white, with curly ginger hair. He is wearing a white Bluey t–shirt, shorts and white trainers.’

A spokesman for HM Coastguard said: ‘We are assisting Suffolk Constabulary with an incident at Brantham by sending an HM Coastguard helicopter and Coastguard Rescue Teams from Felixstowe and Holbrook.’ 

A former teacher and hotel manager is on trial accused of raping three women over a 20-year period. Daniel Gravell is alleged to have indecently assaulted and raped a woman in 2001, to have raped a second woman in 2005, and to have raped a third woman in 2021.

The 44-year-old defendant denies the allegations and is on trial at Swansea Crown Court.

It is the prosecution case that the first alleged rape happened at Gravell’s home in Johnston near Carmarthen in 2001 after the defendant and the woman met on a night out. The court was told that the pair initially engaged in consensual kissing but when the woman told Gravell she was on her period he “yanked out” her tampon, pinned her down, and raped her.

The second alleged rape is said to have happened in 2005. Jurors were told that Gravell took the complainant to a “secluded spot” behind Carmarthen Athletic rugby club and attacked her.

The third allegation of rape involves a woman who Gravell met on social media in 2021. It is the prosecution case that defendant drove the woman to the Baltic Hotel in Carmarthenshire which Gravell was managing at the time but which he told the woman he owned. The court was told that after showing her around the hotel, the defendant took the woman to one of the rooms, locked the door, and raped her.

It is Gravell’s case that the 2001 incident “simply never happened” while the 2005 and 2021 incidents were consensual sexual encounters.

On Tuesday the jury heard evidence from the alleged victim of the 2001 incident. She told the court how she met the defendant in Carmarthen town centre before going back to his home in nearby Johnstown.

The complainant said Gravell and her were kissing consensually on his bed when she told him she was on her period. Jurors heard that at that point “things changed” and Gravell got on top of her before “ripping out” her tampon and raping her.

The woman told the jury that the defendant gave her a sexually transmitted disease, and that on a subsequent occasion when she saw him out in Carmarthen she decided to confront him about it. she told the jury Gravell “laughed in my face” before she had the chance to get the words out and that he “said something like ‘I gave you a little present’”.

Daniel Gravell, of Porth Y Plas, Johnstown, Carmarthen, denies three counts of rape and one count of indecent assault, and the trial – before Judge Paul Thomas KC – is expected to last two weeks.

You can follow today’s evidence in our live blog below: