Certain groups of older people on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) may be able to ask the DWP to review their claim and potentially receive backdated payments for enhanced mobility rate
Linda Howard Money and Consumer Writer
04:00, 12 Feb 2026
Certain elderly individuals on Personal Independence Payment ( PIP ), particularly those receiving the lower rate of mobility element, may be eligible to request a reassessment of their claim from the Department for Work and Pensions ( DWP ) due to a recent legal amendment. Those over State Pension age might also qualify for an increased award for the mobility component of PIP, even if they’ve ceased receiving the benefit.
Advertisement
This legal change solely pertains to claimants over State Pension age and their eligibility for the enhanced mobility award. DWP guidelines clarify that this only applies to PIP claims reviewed between April 8, 2013, and November 20, 2020.
This legislative shift comes in the wake of a tribunal ruling on May 22, 2020, which pinpointed an inadvertent loophole in regulation 27 of the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013.
The guidance clarifies: “DWP did not have the legal powers to restrict the mobility award for claimants who were in receipt of the standard rate of the mobility award and over State Pension age, on the grounds of new medical evidence. New medical evidence is a report from a health professional requested by DWP which recommended the enhanced rate of the mobility award.
“DWP were only able to restrict the mobility award for claimants if a relevant change in circumstances was identified after they reached State Pension age.”
Advertisement
To rectify this unintentional oversight, amendments to PIP regulations came into force from November 30, 2020, reports the Daily Record.
The DWP is urging anyone potentially impacted to request a review of their claim.
Steve Tandy has opted for cohesion against the Azzurri
11:19, 12 Mar 2026
Advertisement
The word “growth” has been used throughout the course of this Six Nations Championship by the Wales coaching team but Saturday’s clash with Italy should fall into the must-win category.
Having taken on the toughest job in world rugby, Steve Tandy has been reluctant to put too much pressure on his squad, at least externally, when it comes to winning games. Wales have been here before back in 2003 when former head coach Sir Steve Hansen emphasised the need to focus on the performance, rather than results.
It was misunderstood at the time with Wales at such a low ebb that they had to focus on getting the performance right and only then would the results come.
Wales are in a similar place under Tandy and are not in a position where they can expect to beat most sides given their lowly place in the world rankings.
Advertisement
It is a long-term plan and improvement was always going to be gradual before they can claim some much-needed victories.
Nobody gave Wales a cat’s chance in hell of beating Ireland in Dublin yet they took a huge step forward regarding performance.
Despite the defeat the overriding mood afterwards was one of optimism because Wales’ pack had fronted up, the set-piece was good and defensively they were far tougher to break down.
Advertisement
But despite the obvious improvements a third successive Six Nations whitewash can never be deemed an acceptable result.
Yes, Italy are much improved and are currently a better side than Wales but finishing the Six Nations without a single victory would not be classed as progress in the eyes of many.
Nobody expects Wales to beat the likes of France or Ireland in their current state but there has to be at least one win to take into the summer.
By the time of the game it will have been three years – or 1,099 days – since Wales last won a Six Nations fixture. That has to change at the Principality Stadium on Saturday.
The Scarlets playmaker was outstanding in the narrow defeat to Scotland and it would have been a boost if the 25-year-old was available to take his place in the matchday 23.
But there is plenty to build on after two promising performances against Scotland and Ireland as Tandy continues to manufacture some cohesion in his side.
Get the latest Wales Rugby merch at Kitbag
Advertisement
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
The Six Nations is running from February 5 to March 14 and Wales Rugby fans can get the latest jerseys, hoodies and more at Kitbag.
Wales matched Ireland’s physicality for large parts of the game and they will have to do the same again if they are to get the better of the Azzurri.
The set-piece will also have to function as well as it did at the Aviva Stadium, while defensively they will have to be on their mettle.
Advertisement
Italy centre Tommaso Menoncello is a world-class player who proved to be the difference between winning and losing in Rome last Saturday.
His centre partnership with Ignacio Brex is one of the most proficient in world rugby.
If Wales cannot find a way to contain Menoncello and Brex, they will not emerge victorious.
The Wales centre partnership of Joe Hawkins and Eddie James has slowly improved from game to game, even if it has not fully fired in attack.
Advertisement
This is a fourth consecutive start for Hawkins and James which is important because the last time a Wales centre partnership started four games together was Nick Tompkins and George North back in 2022.
Wales have taken great strides forward up-front and they are also clinical in the opposition 22 but they will need to cut out the unforced errors while also firing more shots with ball in hand.
Italy are ahead of Wales but the challenge will be an emotional one after the high of a first-ever victory over England.
If Wales can combine the physical edge they showed in Dublin with greater accuracy and intent in attack, this is a game they are capable of winning.
Advertisement
The progress has been evident in recent weeks, but at some stage improvement has to translate into a result. After three years without a Six Nations victory, Saturday would be the ideal time to put an unwanted record to bed.
An easyJet flight from Tunisia to Belfast had to be diverted on Tuesday after a medical emergency on board.
The flight from Enfidha was diverted to Liverpool following the incident. Belfast Live approached the airline for comment after a source told us the flight landed at its final destination more than two hours after the scheduled time due to the incident.
Advertisement
A spokesman told Belfast Live: “Flight EZY3072 from Enfidha to Belfast International on Tuesday evening was diverted to Liverpool due to a customer onboard requiring urgent medical attention.
If you spend any time on social media, you may have noticed a curious trend: wellness influencers singing the praises of nicotine. Not smoking or vaping but nicotine patches and pouches, repackaged as cognitive enhancers, productivity boosters and even weight-loss aids. But does the science support this rebrand, or are we watching a familiar substance undergo a very modern makeover?
Nicotine is primarily a stimulant and derived from the tobacco plant. Small amounts of nicotine are also found in other members of the nightshade family, including tomatoes, aubergines, potatoes and green peppers. However, the levels in these foods are minimal compared with those in tobacco.
Nicotine works by latching on to specific receptors found throughout the body, triggering the release of various brain chemicals such as dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin. These receptors, along with a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, play an important role in attention, learning and memory.
The evidence on whether nicotine can enhance cognitive performance is mixed. One large review of 41 trials involving healthy adults – both non-smokers and smokers – found that nicotine produced small improvements in areas such as fine motor skills, attention and aspects of short-term and working memory.
Advertisement
An animal study demonstrated nicotine increased working memory and boosted levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a protein important for learning and brain resilience. However, other research shows that in healthy non-smokers, nicotine often has neutral or even negative cognitive effects.
This difference comes down to starting point. People who already have cognitive difficulties have more room to improve, while those with healthy brain function are already performing close to their best. Because of this, nicotine is unlikely to offer any real benefit to people who don’t have cognitive impairments.
Small experimental studies have explored whether nicotine patches might help people with mild cognitive impairment, with one trial reporting slight improvements in memory test scores over six months. Research suggests nicotine may have protective effects in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, partly because it reduces inflammation, prevents cell death and supports cognitive function.
Nicotine has also been linked to weight loss and reduced appetite. It appears to influence the parts of the brain that control hunger and makes the body burn more energy by triggering the release of stimulating hormones like adrenaline. While some animal studies suggest nicotine can reduce body weight by speeding up fat burning, there is not yet strong evidence that this holds true in humans
Advertisement
Where nicotine is useful is in smoking cessation. Nicotine replacement therapy is an effective way to help people stop smoking. But this benefit comes from reducing exposure to tobacco smoke, which contains a cocktail of chemicals and cancer-causing agents – not from nicotine itself being healthy.
An effective way to quit smoking. Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock.com
Highly addictive
Nicotine is not harmless and regular use can lead to dependence. Nicotine activates receptors in the brain that trigger the release of several chemical messengers, including dopamine (the so-called feel-good hormone). This surge in dopamine creates the pleasurable sensations and reinforcement that contribute to nicotine’s addictive effects.
Studies in animals show using nicotine during the teenage years can lead to long lasting changes in the brain and behaviour, including higher risk of other drug use, reduced attention and mood problems.
Teenagers have more nicotine receptors in the brain’s reward areas than adults, which makes nicotine’s effects stronger and the developing brain more vulnerable. Similar effects can be seen in a developing baby during pregnancy.
Advertisement
Common side-effects of using nicotine include nausea, vomiting and headaches. It can also cause more serious heart and blood-vessel harms.
Nicotine triggers the release of chemicals such as adrenaline and noradrenaline, and studies show that higher levels of these can raise heart rate, increase blood pressure and make the heart work harder.
Nicotine also damages the inner walls of blood vessels by causing inflammation, raising blood pressure and disrupting normal blood vessel function. The evidence is clear that no nicotine product is safe for the heart and cardiovascular system – a conclusion now officially backed by major health organisations, including the World Health Organization.
Is nicotine safer without smoke? Yes. Is it safe? No.
Advertisement
Reduced harm is not the same as benefit. The scientific picture is complicated: possible cognitive effects, potential therapeutic avenues, but clear risks and strong addictive potential.
The science does not support using nicotine as a cognitive enhancer or lifestyle supplement for healthy adults. What it does support is using nicotine replacement therapy to help people stop smoking. Outside that context, the risks outweigh the hype. Wellness trends come and go, but addiction is far harder to shake.
Skatefest 2026 will take place on Saturday, July 18, promising a full day of skate competitions, live music, street art, and community activities.
The grassroots event is organised by Ryedale Skate School in partnership with Norton Town Council.
It aims to create an inclusive space where people of all ages and abilities can experience skateboarding culture.
Advertisement
RECOMMENDED READING:
Ryan Swain, local skateboard coach and youth advocate, said: “Skatefest is about much more than skateboarding. It’s about community, belonging and giving young people a positive space to express themselves.
“We’ve seen how powerful skate culture can be in bringing people together and building confidence, and we’re proud to be working with Norton Town Council to bring this event back bigger than ever.”
Visitors can enjoy a packed programme throughout the day, including vert and mini ramp competitions, live DJs and music performances, street art demonstrations, and free skate lessons for beginners.
Advertisement
Food and drink vendors, artisan stalls, charity raffles, and a tombola will also be on offer.
Ryan said: “Whether you’re a lifelong skater, someone who’s never stepped on a board before, or just want a great day out with the family, Skatefest is for everyone.
“Events like this help build stronger communities and give young people positive opportunities to connect, learn and thrive.”
Mayor of Norton, Di Keal, said: “Norton town council is delighted to be supporting Skatefest again this year after a hugely successful event in 2025.
Advertisement
“We are installing a second shelter at the skatepark shortly funded by a grant from Live Like Ralph, a charity established in memory of keen skater, Ralph Roberts, who sadly lost his life during the Covid pandemic.
“Ralph’s father, Neil and the Live Like Ralph team visited last year on a fundraising bike ride from Scarborough to Lytham and they loved the skatepark that has been created in Norton. The town council is using the grant to purchase the new shelter, which will be decorated live by a street artist at Skatefest and will feature the Live Like Ralph logo.
“The team at Live Like Ralph will hopefully be joining us to celebrate and enjoy Skatefest and I would encourage families from across our twin towns to visit the skatepark on July 18 to enjoy the event and witness some spectacular skating and stunts.”
The organisers are encouraging local businesses, charities, and independent traders to get involved by hosting stalls or supporting the event.
Advertisement
Interested organisations can contact ryedaleskateschool@gmail.com.
Skatefest 2026 will run from 11am to 5pm on Saturday, July 18.
Should I get a robot vacuum cleaner? Until recently, for most people the answer was no. Even the best robot vacuums had a tendency to mount chair legs and get stuck, wheels feebly pawing at the air, or to have a nervous breakdown in a confined space.
AI has changed all that. “People want robot helpers,” says Colin Angle, the MIT robotics expert whose iRobot Roomba kick-started the whole industry back in 2002. “Rather than clean the whole house, they want to tell their robot vacuum to just clean under the kitchen table, or in the office, but that takes a huge amount of tech.”
The best robot vacuums cost well over £1,000 and even the cheapest are over £300, so these are not toys (although there have been more than a billion views of pets riding robot vacuums on YouTube.) To find out which are worth your hard-earned cash, we put some of the best robot vacuums to the test.
Advertisement
You can read our full reviews below, followed by answers to frequently asked questions, like how long robot vacuums last and which has the best suction. Here’s a quick look at five:
Robot vacuums are constantly evolving and have a fascinating origin. Angle helped design the Sojourner rover that explored Mars and one of his robots was sent to the Fukushima disaster zone. It might be surprising to find this technology trundling around your floor, but the challenges are the same: navigating different surfaces, unusual shapes and unexpected obstacles.
“Now they use cameras not just to see where they’re going and remember where they’ve been, but to understand obstacles,” Angle says.
Advertisement
As well as advanced mapping technology, many robot vacuums can now also mop (although not all), and the docking stations have developed, too. While some simply charge the vacuum between cleans, others remove dust, debris and water from the robot’s on board bins and several even clean and sterilise mop pads. Below, you’ll even find a robot vacuum (the Dreame X50) with a mechanical leg for clambering over obstacles.
Ultimately, the best robot vacuum for your home comes down to the flooring you have and your budget; the more you spend, the more power or functionality you’ll get.
The boy riding the bike was taken to hospital for treatment
A boy riding a bike was taken to hospital after a crash with a car. Emergency services were called to a crash on The Avenue in Godmanchester at around 4.20pm on Wednesday (March 11).
Advertisement
The crash involved a pedal cycle and car. The boy riding the bike was taken to hospital to treat his injuries. The road was closed while police attended.
A police spokesperson said: “We were called at about 4.20pm yesterday to The Avenue, Godmanchester, to reports of a collision between a pedal cycle and a car.
“The cyclist, a boy, was taken to hospital for treatment to injuries believed not to be serious. There were no arrests and an investigation is ongoing.”
The East of England Ambulance Service has been contacted for more information.
The Whitby Coastguard Rescue Team said that it was dispatched to help the man, who was found partway down the slope with a suspected hip injury, after falling from his scooter.
After an initial assessment, the team say it ‘became clear the situation was time critical’ and they began to give care and provided blankets to keep the man warm until Yorkshire Ambulance Service arrived on scene.
Once the crew reached the site, Coastguard officers assisted in transporting equipment down the steep path to the scene.
Advertisement
Following further assessment and pain relief administered by the paramedics, the teams carried out a stretcher evacuation up the cliff path before transferring the injured man safely into an awaiting ambulance.
“Steep coastal paths can be challenging terrain, particularly when using mobility aids. If you ever see someone in difficulty along the coast, call 999 and ask for the Coastguard,” said Whitby Coastguard Rescue Team.
To fairly compare models, we put every dehumidifier through a series of structured, real-world tests. We begin with set up, assessing whether it can be unpacked and running within minutes or if it takes time to figure out.
We also judge ease of use, looking for clearly labelled and responsive controls. We check how easy it is to empty and reinsert the water tank and whether any companion app connects reliably and adds genuine control rather than gimmicks. Design details matter too, so we look at cable length, portability, self-draining features and safety cut-offs. Build quality, durability, extra features and overall value for money are all important.
Next, we assess its effectiveness. First, we measure how well a unit reduces humidity after a hot shower, recording how long it takes to bring the room back to a comfortable 50 per cent. Then, we test laundry mode by hanging a standard load of washing and noting how quickly it dries compared to normal conditions.
Advertisement
Finally, we measure noise levels with a decibel app and track energy consumption over the course of an hour using a plug meter.
A tie that had looked enthrallingly unpredictable, only for the first leg to be set by perhaps the most predictable development possible.
Liam Rosenior had replaced Robert Sanchez with Filip Jorgenson specifically for his footwork, and of course it was a bad goalkeeper pass that set up Vitinha for a decisive goal.
After that, Paris Saint-Germain took a step up – and then another two – and Chelsea didn’t go with them.
The ending ensured this match continued some themes of this Champions League week: erratic goalkeeping displays and Premier League defeats, as Paris Saint-Germain beat Chelsea 5-2.
Advertisement
What will further anger Rosenior was that the scale of the scoreline didn’t really reflect the game. Chelsea’s actual performance hadn’t been in the same sphere as those by Liverpool, Manchester City or Tottenham Hotspur – despite the same actual outcome as the last one.
Chelsea had largely given as good as they got in a game of almost the highest European quality… had it just ended in the 74th minute. He later spoke of a “crazy” final 15 minutes where his team – including himself – didn’t stay “calm”. That was maybe summed up in Enzo Fernandez arguing with Jorgensen and Pedro Neto’s moment with a ballboy, for which Rosenior apologised.
Maybe some of the performance is also fatigue from the Premier League season, which is obviously going to be a discussion over the next week.
Chelsea really have to raise it, though.
Advertisement
Kvicha Kvaratshkelia scored twice to give PSG control of the tie (Reuters)
A 3-2 reverse was eminently salvageable but 5-2? Kvicha Kvaratshkelia is quite an option to bring off the bench, and he duly maximised that extra space to score another trademark exquisitely curling strike.
The most remarkable thing is that it may not have even been the pick of the goals. All of them involved exceptional class, even if they came from errors and fallibility that actually elevated the game in terms of drama.
That was most visible with maybe the best of them, Ousmane Dembele’s brilliant breakaway. Jorgenson could do little about that or Kvaratshkelia’s first, but the third and fifth?
Advertisement
They might decide the tie.
That might haunt Rosenior, especially to make a call so big – and so conspicuous given Antoni Kinsky – this early in his Chelsea career.
There is of course another story to this game.
The European champions may have finally started to play again. They looked like the best team in Europe again.
Advertisement
There is now always a sense of two sides with this PSG. It should never be forgotten they are ultimately a sportswashing project, who have still assembled one of the most expensive sides in history without “stars”.
And yet, in a purely football sense, they are refreshing.
Vitinha lofts the ball over a stranded Jorgensen (Getty)
In a Premier League that has become dominated by high-definition tactical positioning, so many of their players are willing to take someone and have a shot from anywhere.
Advertisement
They go for it.
That isn’t to say that Luis Enrique isn’t highly tactical himself. What he has essentially done is enhance the Spanish positional game for the first time in 15 years, adding dribbling and intensity to a system that is almost supposed to be the antithesis of that. That comes from a lot of hard thinking and hard work, if an admittedly easy schedule to facilitate it.
The end product is nevertheless something that looks so free… if occasionally too free.
PSG have some clumsy moments themselves.
Advertisement
They are far from perfect, and that included last season.
And Chelsea, for their part, did initially prey on that and force more errors.
The back-and-forth of the goals were cases in point.
Advertisement
Bradley Barcola opened the scoring for PSG (Action Images/Reuters)
After Bradley Barcola had displayed precisely this willingness to just let go with the opening goal – a blockbusting strike in off the bar, albeit with considerable space – there was a spell when it looked like they could just overwhelm Chelsea with their live-wire attacking.
If Rosenior will face a lot of questions about the Jorgensen decision, though, he does deserve credit for many of his in-game calls. It is clearly one of his best qualities.
Chelsea duly recalibrated around Enzo Fernandez, who had one of his finest games for the club.
Everything went through him, including the two goals.
Advertisement
It was his pass that put Malo Gusto into space for Chelsea’s equaliser. The finish was strong but it still went through Matvey Safonov.
A theme of the European champions’ more underwhelming 2025-26 campaign has been whether they are missing Gigi Donnarumma. It was hard not to think he’d have saved that… but the Italian wasn’t exactly having the best night for City.
Chelsea began to really press PSG in from there, only for Luis Enrique’s side to exploit their own weakness.
Advertisement
Chelsea were undone by late goals (Ben Whitley/PA) (PA Wire)
This, typically, was done in the most direct way possible: pure pace. After Cole Palmer had a shot well saved by Safonov – no questions that time – Desire Doue showed quick thinking to immediately get the ball to Dembele.
He exhilaratingly surged up the pitch, although Wesley Fofana initially did well to stay with him. Just when it seemed like Dembele might have been pushed wide, he turned in, then went out – and in the process turned Fofana inside out – to finish supremely.
It was the type of move that was so impressive it produced one of those deafening sounds from the crowd, but it wasn’t definitive.
Chelsea again responded. PSG again showed their own fallibility. Pedro Neto displayed his own directness down the left, before squaring for Fernandez to finish emphatically.
Advertisement
It was another supreme goal, and should have been the set-up for a grand crescendo, an operatic back and forth.
Only one team stayed at the level, though, as Jorgensen – and Rosenior – endured a dismal low.
That may well be it for the tie. PSG do not look the kind of team to give up a three-goal lead now they’re European champions.
And they finally look like they can be that again.
Advertisement
Chelsea and Rosenior, by contrast, look like they still have a bit to learn.