Kayden Walker, 12, drowned after getting into difficulty in the River Tay while on a day trip with a community group in July 2019.

A risk assessment for a river boarding trip which led to a 12-year-old boy’s death was not “suitable and sufficient”, an inquiry has heard. Kayden Walker, who could not swim, died after becoming trapped on the upstream side of a weir while on a day trip with the Church House community group in July 2019.

A Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI) heard from Katrina Pearson, an environmental health officer with Perth and Kinross Council, who was involved in the investigation following his death. Asked by procurator fiscal depute Catherine Fraser whether she would consider the weir to be a “high risk location”, she replied “absolutely” and said the main hazard would be body entrapment.

However, she said a number of reasonable precautions could have been taken to prevent the incident. She told the inquiry on Tuesday: “In the first instance I would expect that the risk assessment for the activity would have been suitable and sufficient, which it was not in this case.

“And if it was they would have known about the hazard of the weir and the potential for body entrapment and also the risk to non swimmers and to swimmers. And I would expect that sufficient controls would be put in place to mitigate this – avoidance of the weir or not taking non-swimmers to such a high risk location, or additional supervision or robust safety briefing.”

Kayden, from Glasgow, was separated from his board during a river boarding session on the River Tay, near the village of Stanley, Perthshire, on July 28 2019. After being pulled from the water, he was airlifted to Ninewells Hospital in Dundee and was then transferred to the Royal Hospital for Children in Glasgow where he died on July 29.

The FAI, taking place at Falkirk Sheriff Court, follows the prosecution of Outdoor Pursuits Scotland Ltd in October 2024 for a contravention of health and safety legislation which led to Kayden’s death. The company was fined £10,000. Aimee Doran, representing Outdoor Pursuits, put it to Mrs Pearson that she was commenting on reasonable precautions from a health and safety point of view and without having any particular expertise in water-based activities.

Mrs Pearson replied: “Yes, from the health and safety point of view, not technical aspects.”

The joint FAI is also considering the death of Ruaridh Stevenson, 39, from Cupar, Fife, who drowned after trying to help a client who experienced difficulties in the waters flowing through Dollar Glen, Stirlingshire on April 13, 2024. Mr Stevenson was a director of a company which offered “canyoning” experiences on Scottish rivers.

The inquiry heard from Peter Carroll, a volunteer assistant ranger with the National Trust for Scotland (NTS) which cares for the area where the incident happened. He helped give CPR to Mr Stevenson after a member of the public came to tell them what was happening as he worked with NTS countryside ranger Laura Livingstone.

Mr Carroll went to the scene which was in an area called the Devil’s Cauldron which Ms Livingstone had described to the FAI as a “water feature hollowed out which forms a bowl that goes down about seven or eight feet.”

He told the inquiry: “When I looked down into the cauldron I could see Mr Stevenson on a ledge lying on his back and a chap was doing CPR.”

Mr Carroll then went to guide emergency services to the scene, which could not be reached by vehicles, before getting into the water himself to help with CPR. He said: “I was in the water until Mr Stevenson was pronounced dead and the recovery process started.”

Ms Livingstone, who has been an NTS ranger for 10 years, said the water level looked “high” on the day of the incident and she thought it was “borderline” as to whether canyoners should be in it. She told the inquiry that the area around the Devil’s Cauldron is fenced off after an incident around a decade ago where someone jumped in and died after hitting their head.

Ms Fraser asked: “Despite the fence do canyoners move the fence to access it?” to which Ms Livingstone replied, “yes.”

The inquiry also heard that there is a section nearby not managed by NTS that is not fenced off. Karen Railton, representing NTS asked: “Do you think if a sign was put up saying it was dangerous that would stop canyoners?”

Ms Livingstone said, “no.”

The FAI continues before Sheriff Keith O’Mahony.

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.

Donald Trump has warned the US could take action in Cuba after his Iran war, days after a rare riot on the island.

The US president said on Sunday that they could reach a deal with Cuba or “do whatever we have to do”.

But Mr Trump suggested no action would be taken in Cuba until his war in Iran was over.

It also comes after a rare riot in Cuba on Saturday, during which protesters attacked the Communist Party office over blackouts, according to local media.

Iran war latest: Trump issues warning to NATO over Iran

‘We’re going to do Iran before Cuba’

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said: “Cuba also wants to make a deal, and I think we will pretty soon either make a deal or ​do whatever we have to do.

“We’re talking to Cuba, but we’re going to do Iran before Cuba.”

He also suggested on Monday that Cuba may be the target of a “friendly takeover” before adding it “may not be a friendly takeover”.

His comments follow years of tensions between Washington and Havana, with sanctions and disputes over migration and security among issues.

Cuba’s President, Miguel Diaz-Canel, said on Friday his country had opened talks with the US as it continues to face one of its worst economic crises in decades.

‘Away from confrontation’

Share

Advertisement

Iran war: Trump demands help from allies

He said: “These talks have been aimed at finding solutions through dialogue to the bilateral differences we have between the two nations.”

Mr Diaz-Canel added that he hoped negotiations would move the long-term rivals “away from confrontation”.

Cuba’s economic turmoil has been exacerbated by disruptions in imported oil, which it relies on to run power plants and transportation networks.

Fuel shortages have also forced authorities to impose rolling electricity outages and to limit some public services.

During Saturday’s riot, the anti-government protesters began rallying peacefully before turning violent, a state-run newspaper said.

Advertisement

Share

‘We will soon get the Hormuz Strait’

Read more:
Emergency crews called to 15-vehicle crash on motorway
Laptop found in search for missing academic

Videos on social media showed people throwing rocks through the windows of a building as they shouted “liberty” in the background.

Mr Diaz-Canel said he felt the anger was understandable but that “there would be no impunity for vandalism and violence”.

In recent weeks, Mr Trump has insisted Cuba was on the verge of collapse or eager to make a deal with the US.

As the Middle East conflict intensifies and oil and gas prices swing wildly, the UK has seen renewed calls to drill more in the North Sea. The argument is straightforward: if Britain produces more of its own oil and gas, household energy bills should fall.

But our analysis suggests the effect would be minimal. Even if the UK maximised North Sea extraction and returned revenues directly to households, the reduction in energy bills would be at most a modest £82 per year – far smaller than the savings expected from accelerating the shift to renewable energy.

In fact, a faster transition away from gas-powered electricity could cut household energy bills by three times as much as maximising North Sea oil and gas.

Why UK energy bills are so high

A typical UK household has a single “dual fuel” bill covering both electricity and gas. This can be divided into several different components.

The largest share is the wholesale cost – the price suppliers (the company named on your bill) pay for electricity and gas – which accounts for about 41% of the bill. The rest covers the costs of running and maintaining energy networks (23%), operating costs and debts (15%), policy costs such as environmental and social levies (12%) and VAT.

At the wholesale level, the UK does not consistently pay more than other European countries. At various points since 2022, countries such as Italy and Germany have faced similar or higher wholesale costs.

Yet UK households still pay some of the highest retail electricity prices in Europe. That’s because of how the electricity market works.

In Britain, the wholesale electricity price is usually set by the most expensive generator needed to meet demand. That generator is often a gas-fired power station. As a result, electricity prices tend to rise and fall with gas prices – even when much of the electricity is produced by cheaper sources such as wind or solar.

Gas also dominates home heating – 85% of UK households still rely on gas boilers, far more than in most comparable countries

This makes UK households highly exposed to swings in global fossil fuel prices. Gas prices are set on international markets, which are heavily exposed to geopolitical shocks, as seen both in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and again today.

Britain’s poorly insulated homes – among the least energy efficient in northern Europe – compounds the problem. This means households consume more gas to achieve the same level of warmth.

Why more North Sea drilling wouldn’t cut bills

Producing more oil and gas in the North Sea would not create the UK’s “own special supply”, nor could its price be set specifically for UK citizens.

That’s because any new production would be sold on international markets at international prices. The UK simply doesn’t have the ability to extract, refine and use oil all by itself even if it wanted to – some international trading will always be necessary.

The only way North Sea extraction could reduce household bills is through government revenues. Taxes and levies on oil and gas profits – the so-called fiscal “take” – could in principle be redistributed to households.

To explore this possibility, we modelled a scenario in which the UK maximised North Sea oil and gas and used all revenues collected to subsidise lower energy bills.

Even under those assumptions, the effect would be limited. Household bills would fall by between £16 and £82 per year. That’s roughly 1% to 4.6% of the current average household energy bill of £1,776, according to UK regulator Ofgem.

Bigger savings from renewables

A different policy direction – one that reduces the role of gas in electricity production – produces much larger savings.

If the price of electricity was set by cheaper renewable energy rather than by gas, our analysis suggests households could save £105 to £331 per year through lower wholesale energy costs.

That is roughly three times more than the “maximise oil and gas” scenario.

Importantly, these savings would also be recurring. Once electricity prices are less tied to volatile gas markets, and instead are set by cheaper and infinitely available resources – wind and sun – households benefit every year.

Savings could be still higher if the structure of electricity bills were rebalanced. At present, many policy costs – including support for renewables – are added to electricity bills rather than funded through general taxation.

If those policy costs were moved into general taxation, as announced in the government’s autumn 2025 spending review, the average household could save up another £110 or so annually. In our renewables scenario, that would bring the total savings to about £441 per year.

Moving policy and system costs from bills onto general taxation is one way to make energy costs fairer and more egalitarian. That’s because energy bills take a larger share of income from lower income households while taxes better reflect ability to pay.

Our analysis used oil and gas prices in January 2026, prior to the breakout of the US-Israel war on Iran. In other words, ours is a conservative scenario that assumes relatively favourable conditions for fossil fuels. If global prices rise further, the advantages of renewable energy would become even greater.

Reducing exposure to fossil fuel shocks

Recent history illustrates how costly dependence on fossil fuels can be.

Research by our colleagues at Oxford Smith School found that if the UK had moved away from importing Russian oil and gas after its 2014 invasion of Crimea, it would have saved about £22 billion in energy costs during the price spike after the invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Similarly, had the UK adopted the “balanced net zero” pathway proposed by its official advisory Climate Change Committee, it could avoid spending around £70 billion on crude oil and natural gas between 2022 and 2030.

Today’s energy crisis simply reiterates this argument: if the UK was less reliant on oil and gas today, it would be in a much better economic position.

The best way to keep energy bills low in the long run is to reduce dependence on gas altogether. That means expanding renewable generation, investing in energy storage and grid infrastructure, improving home insulation and electrifying heating through technologies such as heat pumps. Support for vulnerable households will also be crucial during the transition to a lower-carbon energy system.

Our findings refute speculation that draining the North Sea of all oil and gas would significantly lower bills and make the UK energy secure. Even if further fossil fuel extraction went ahead and all tax revenues were returned directly to consumers, the savings for consumers would be modest. Meanwhile the UK would remain exposed to geopolitical shocks and be economically worse off.

Staying the course on clean energy would not only save households three times as much money but render the UK truly energy secure for generations to come.

“I was never a member of the IRA or its Army Council, and I never held any role or rank within the IRA.”

Advertisement

Gerry Adams has told the High Court that he had “no involvement whatsoever” in Provisional IRA bombings in England and that he was never a part of the organisation.

The former Sinn Féin president entered the witness box on Tuesday in defence of a legal claim against him brought by three victims of bombings in England in the 1970s and 1990s.

John Clark, a victim of the 1973 Old Bailey bombing in London; Jonathan Ganesh, a 1996 London Docklands bombing victim; and Barry Laycock, a victim of the 1996 Arndale shopping centre bombing in Manchester, all allege that Mr Adams was a leading member of the Provisional IRA on those dates, including of its Army Council, and are seeking £1 in damages.

Mr Adams is defending the claim, claiming in a witness statement that membership of Sinn Féin “does not equate to membership of the IRA”.

Wearing a dark suit and tie, a shamrock and a badge of the Palestinian flag, Mr Adams began his evidence by wishing the judge, Mr Justice Swift, “a very happy St Patrick’s Day”.

In his 20-page witness statement, Mr Adams said he “was not involved in any way in the planning, preparation or conduct of” any of the bombings, and “have never been a senior, let alone most senior figure, in the IRA”.

He continued: “I had no involvement in or advance knowledge of the Old Bailey bombing (1973), the Canary Wharf bombing (1996) or the Manchester bombing (1996).

“I have never been charged, prosecuted or convicted of any offence in connection with any of the bombing incidents in which the claimants were injured.”

He also said: “I was never a member of the IRA or its Army Council, and I never held any role or rank within the IRA.

“I repeat that I had no involvement whatsoever in the authorisation, planning or conduct of the bombings in which the claimants were sadly injured.”

Mr Adams also said that opponents of Sinn Féin, of which he was president from 1983 to 2018, “have repeatedly sought to conflate” the party with the Provisional IRA.

“As I have always stated, Sinn Féin and the IRA are separate organisations,” Mr Adams said.

He continued: “I have no knowledge, beyond what has been widely reported in the public domain, as to the structure or decision-making processes of the IRA.”

Mr Adams told the court that he was “very conscious” that the three bomb victims had “suffered significantly”, and that his statement should not be taken “as criticism of the claimants, or as any attempt to deny or diminish their awful experiences”.

During cross-examination by barrister Sir Max Hill KC, Mr Adams agreed that 1,178 deaths were caused by the Provisional IRA, the business of which was “to resist armed British occupation and aggression in the part of Ireland that I lived in”.

He had earlier said that the ignorance of Irish history among British people is “shocking”.

Advertisement

Anne Studd KC, for the three bomb victims, previously told the trial that Mr Adams was “directly responsible for and complicit in those decisions made by that organisation to detonate bombs on the British mainland in 1973 and 1996”.

The barrister also said that the difference between being in “the Army” and being a member of Sinn Féin was not a “clear either/or choice”.

She added: “The claimants’ case is that none of these bombings in the United Kingdom mainland took place without the knowledge and agreement of the defendant in his role in the Provisional IRA and latterly as a member of the seven-man Army Council.”

She concluded: “There is no doubt that the defendant contributed to the peace in Northern Ireland, but the claimants say that on the evidence he also contributed to the war.”

Ms Studd also told the court that Mr Adams had “a foot in each camp” of the military and political sides of the Irish Republican movement, and that was likely “as involved as the people who planted and detonated those bombs”.

The trial is due to conclude later in March.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Jason Barstow, 29, is accused of robbery and possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence following an incident at Market Cross Jewellers on Westgate in Guisborough on Saturday afternoon, March 14.

Barstow, of St Ann’ Court, Hartlepool, appeared before Teesside Magistrates’ Court on Monday, March 16. He did not enter a plea to either charge during the hearing.

Barstow was remanded in custody and is due to appear next at Teesside Crown Court on April 16 for a plea and trial preparation hearing.

Police were called to the jewellery shop shortly before 4pm on March 14 following reports of a robbery.

It is alleged a man smashed his way through a window with a hammer, threatened staff and took items before fleeing.

Members of the public chased and detained the suspect until officers arrived at the scene.

Following the incident, Cleveland Police confirmed a 29-year-old man had been arrested on suspicion of robbery and taken into custody.

It has been called the ‘easiest way’ to make lawns look better.

Now that it is spring, many of us are turning our attention to lawns in preparation for sunny days. Lawns can seem difficult to deal with, especially if they aren’t level.

However, a garden expert has explained how to achieve a lush lawn this summer without any bumps. The key is all in the preparation, which can be done now.

Expert Michael, who shares hacks on social media @themichaelgriffiths, revealed his fix that uses a mix of sand, soil and compost. He said: “It’s one of the easiest ways to make a lawn look instantly better without re-turfing.”

To make a lawn level, Michael started by preparing the area. He mowed the grass “really short” to two to three centimetres.

Michael explained: “This makes it easier to apply top dressing and you get better visibility of any low spots.” He then made sure to have his top soil, sand and compost to hand.

The expert said you need to combine the materials to a two to one part mix. This means two parts top soil, two parts sand and one part compost.

Michael said: “This combination provides bulk drainage and nutrients to help the grass flourish.” Once combined together, spread it over the bumpy area you mowed.

He then levelled the mix, which can be done with the back of a rake or a lawn-levelling rake. Ensure the mix has been spread across the lawn evenly.

Michael walked on top of the mix to tread it into the ground. He said you can repeat the steps if necessary, to ensure all bumps are covered and a level area has been created.

The social media expert said: “Finally, water in gently to help the mix settle. And if it’s needed, you’re now ready to reseed your lawn.”

Michael told his followers: “If your lawn feels more bumpy than flat, don’t rip it out, you can level it.

“A simple top-dressing mix of sand + soil + compost brushed into the low spots helps smooth the surface while keeping the grass growing through.”

One person asked Michael if it is too early in the year to follow his advice. He replied: “Perfect time to do this now – still probably a little too cold for grass seed but in about 2 weeks it’ll be fine. So you can do this now to get ready.”

Another commented: “Perfect, I got a quote for this that was over £2k which I couldn’t justify. This is brilliant I’m going to attempt myself. Thank you so much for posting.”

As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our
articles.

Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local
services.

These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local
community.

It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need
as much support as possible during these challenging times.

Jason Bailey, 48, carried out an ‘opportunistic’ sex attack upon his victim

A woman was brutally raped by a man while she was working despite her telling him she was not interested in a sexual relationship. The victim said she “blamed herself” for the rape and has “struggled to come to terms with her reaction” having previously believed she could have fought back, a court heard.

Jason Bailey, 48, of Porthcawl, had previously asked his victim if she “fancied some no strings fun” but she had not responded and thought to herself: “Who the hell does he think he is?”. He later approached her and asked her what he thought about his proposition, which she turned down.

A sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court on Tuesday heard Bailey walked towards the victim as she repeatedly told him: “No”. For the biggest stories in Wales first sign up to our daily newsletter here..

He manhandled her and pinned her down before pulling down her leggings and underwear.

The defendant sexually assaulted the victim by forcibly performing oral sex upon her before raping her with his penis.

He only finished raping her when he ejaculated and walked off and told her: “Between us yeah?”.

The victim later confided in friends who contacted the police.

Bailey, of New Road, was later convicted of rape and assault by penetration following a trial. The court heard he has no previous convictions but has a caution for burglary.

In a victim personal statement read to the court by prosecutor Nigel Fryer the victim said: “When it first happened it had such a huge impact on me for so many months of my life – the big stuff and everyday stuff…

“The thought that he could be there and feelings of intimidation made me feel sick… There were regular occasions I could not get out of bed for days on end. I did not wash or brush my teeth. I have always had feelings of anxiety and depression. I felt so angry at myself and blamed myself. I was in shock for some days afterwards.

“I would describe myself as a feisty person and thought I could fight back but I have struggled to come to terms with my reaction and didn’t fight as I thought I would. I started having flashbacks and started drinking in the house, which I never did.”

The victim said she cries and shakes at the thought of seeing the defendant and panics when she sees someone who looks like him. She said she is now unable to socialise other than at her local pub.

In mitigation Andrew Davies said his client has suffered financially and with his mental health while waiting for the trial and described the defendant as a “broken man”.

The barrister said Bailey’s family had suffered tragedy after his younger brother took his own life and he serves as a carer for his mother who has spinal problems and is immobile. He also has a son who he provides for.

Sentencing, Recorder Andrew Hammond said: “This was an opportunistic sexual attack. You took the opportunity to force yourself upon her and did not take no for an answer.”

Bailey was sentenced to six years imprisonment.

The defendant was also made subject to a restraining order indefinitely and was made subject to sex offender notification requirements for life.

Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.

Chelsea were handed a nine-month academy transfer ban and a £750,000 fine over the registration of academy players between 2019 and 2022.

But compare this case with Everton and Nottingham Forest in 2024, when both clubs received points deductions for PSR breaches that appear much less serious.

So what relevance, if any, does all this have on the Premier League’s other major disciplinary case?

Fifteen months after the end of an independent commission hearing into more than 100 alleged breaches of financial rules by Manchester City, the club is still waiting to discover its fate.

Unlike Chelsea, City deny wrongdoing and are contesting the case. And unlike at Stamford Bridge, there has been no change of ownership at the Etihad to provide mitigation.

But City fans will surely be encouraged that the Premier League board did not appear to even consider a points deduction in the case of Chelsea, despite the “deception and concealment”. Indeed, it referred to a two-window transfer ban as an “appropriate” punishment, had the club not self-reported and co-operated.

In July 2023, Uefa fined the club £8m over the same case. And the FA is expected to take similar action when it announces the conclusion of its disciplinary process into the affair in the coming weeks.

But there are clear signs that Chelsea feared it could have been worse. In 2024, it was revealed that owners Todd Boehly and Behdad Eghbali held back £150m of their purchase price for the club to cover potential fines relating to the Abramovich era. So far this episode has cost the club about £18m.

Some of their rivals may feel the cost may have been greater in the form of trophies and prize money they could potentially have won. And also to the integrity and credibility of a competition that relies on everyone following the rules.

The council announced the decision amid concerns that the 275 existing benches across the town are beginning to overwhelm public areas.

The Labour-run authority said the benches, placed in memory of loved ones, can block access for wheelchair users and people with pushchairs.

There are 275 existing benches across the town. (Image: SWNS)

However, locals disagree with the plans.

Daniel Matthews, 40, said: “My mum and dad had a bench put up in memory of my nan who loved to look out to sea when she was alive.

“It was a nice place to sit and pay tribute to her but the bench started falling apart and eventually had to be removed.

“I don’t think it’s fair for the council to say Hartlepool has too many of these benches.”

“It’s a nice way to keep your memories of relatives alive.”

The authority has now paused all future applications and is suggesting tree planting as an alternative.

The authority say the benches can block access for wheelchair and pushchair users. (Image: SWNS)

Not everyone is opposed to the ban.

One mother, who did not wish to be named, said: “It’s a pain to be honest having to almost slalom the pushchair around all these benches when I’m taking my toddler out.

“Lots of these benches don’t just have a plaque either, there are sometimes photos and flowers and teddies.

“They’re becoming like graves rather than somewhere for people to sit on.”

Karl Barowsky, owner of Teak Garden Furniture, which supplies memorial benches, said: “When thoughtfully planned and positioned, memorial benches can sit comfortably within public spaces.

“They support reflection, wellbeing and everyday community use, and they can enhance parks and town centres rather than detract from them.”

Read more:

Karen Oliver, Chair of the council’s Housing, Growth and Communities Committee, said a recent audit identified 115 benches on the Headland, 112 on Seaton Promenade, and 48 in Ward Jackson Park.

She said: “We understand that our communities want to commemorate and remember loved ones, so we acknowledge that this is a very sensitive issue.

“We aim to engage with the owners of benches – where we have ownership information – to agree a sympathetic approach that minimises the need for the removal of benches.”