Two Hartlepool HMOs allowed despite police warning ‘significant’ risk

Hartlepool Borough Council has granted certificates of lawful development for the conversion of 22 and 24 Kilwick Street into two separate five-bedroom HMOs.

The decision comes despite strong opposition from Cleveland Police.

The force previously warned the HMOs pose a “clear and significant” risk to the community, citing concerns about increased crime, anti-social behaviour, and additional pressure on policing resources.

They also argued the move could disrupt what they called a “fragile community” and harm the character of the street.

However, the applications were for certificates of lawful development rather than planning permission.

This means the change of use and internal works did not require formal planning approval.

They said: “A certificate of lawful development (proposed use) as set out in the application should be granted.”

Cleveland Police maintained their opposition.

The force said: “The HMOs presented clear and significant risks relating to vulnerability, crime, anti-social behaviour, policing demand, community cohesion, and cumulative impact.

“The development was inappropriate for this location, risked undermining ongoing policing operations, and should be refused in the interests of public safety, community wellbeing, and responsible urban planning.”

The scheme at 22 Kilwick Street will include a communal dining room, utility room, kitchen, and a ground floor bedroom.

There will also be two en-suite bedrooms on the first floor and two en-suite bedrooms in the loft.

The layout of 24 Kilwick Street will also include communal living areas and five bedrooms, with two en-suite rooms on each of the upper levels.

While the council acknowledged the concerns, they noted the applications met the legal requirements.

They said: “Comments from police had been relayed to the applicant directly and are not discussed further in the report.”

However, decision reports for both properties stated issues of crime, fear of crime, and anti-social behaviour were “considered in detail.”

The council has concluded the plans were acceptable “on balance.”