The cast of Sinners has called out the BAFTAs and BBC for exploiting a man’s disability whilst also blindsiding black presenters and audience members.

“You want to celebrate our art, but you won’t protect it.” – Jayme Lawson calls out the #BAFTAs slip up at the #NAACPImageAwards pic.twitter.com/y19yOIMfrk

— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) March 1, 2026

Last week, the BBC made the ridiculous editorial decision to broadcast an involuntary, racist slur by John Davidson, a white man with Tourette’s. Of course, that resulted in widespread upset and huge increases in racism.

It also sparked heated animosity between Black and disabled communities in the UK. But that is probably precisely what the BBC intended.

The Canary’s Maddison Wheeldon previously reported that:

the BBC seemingly reassured executives from Warner Bros it would not broadcast the slur.

She added:

the BBC may have deliberately left this offensive incident in the cut. This carries considerable weight given the absence of other inappropriate slurs that came as a result of Davidson’s tics.

BBC — Exploitation, not inclusivity

We have to question why production companies, movie producers, and even media outlets (I’m looking at you, BBC) are not providing the necessary resources to keep people from diverse backgrounds and with varied lived experiences safe. 

“Just because you invite someone into a space but you don’t provide the necessary resources to keep them and everyone else in that room safe, by them being there, that’s not inclusivity. That’s exploitation.”

Hrtwt, we’ll talk about this tomorrow. https://t.co/fiaeYsAHYz

Advertisement

— beygala (@HintonsDrew) March 1, 2026

It’s nothing short of exploitation when they fail to do that.

Jayme Lawson absolutely said the right thing: a man with Tourette’s was exploited.

Assuming the censoring of many elements was done by BAFTA, allegedly, they used John Davidson’s random outburst to create division and needlessly.

Many people agreed Mr. Davidson is not at…

Advertisement

— Long Tran (@longttran) March 1, 2026

The BBC were able to censor homophobia. So why couldn’t they muster up enough energy between the whole production team to censor deeply offensive and oppressive, racist language?

I did NAWT expect her to come for blood like that but I’m glad she called out the BAFTAs exploited that mans disability and then blindside the black audience while simultaneously choosing to edit out other things. https://t.co/iZVP7AddkZ

— El Mago (@AtlantisFell) March 1, 2026

Jayme Lawson was putting the blame where it belongs, with the BAFTAs and BBC.

Listen to her and listen to her deeply. It was always the BAFTAS fault. https://t.co/je8WgA0NhY

— 𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚠𝚜𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚛🦇 (@BrowseHorror) March 1, 2026

Lawson also called out both organisations for censoring Akinola Davies Jr. She called for a Free Palestine during her speech.

I love that Jayme Lawson just called out the BAFTAs and BBC for censoring Akinola Davies Jr.’s “Free Palestine” speech https://t.co/A03j73iSvn

— Ahmed Hathout 🇵🇸 (@ahmedhathoutt) March 1, 2026

It’s funny how the BBC remembered to censor that one, isn’t it?

not only is she calling out the BAFTAS for the exploitation, she’s calling out those trying to put John Davidson’s comfort over Michael and Del Roy’s. https://t.co/R4Dbe5z65w

— helena (@wannabespiced) March 1, 2026

What John Davidson did was not his fault. However, that does not omit the harm that his words caused to black people.

what john davidson did was involuntary, he feels awful and i hope he’s okay, but 98% of those advocating on his behalf, have been belittling michael and del roy’s embarrassment/humiliation at what they experienced to uplift john at this time, and you are 100% foul for that.

— helena (@wannabespiced) March 1, 2026

Additionally, speaking about the ableism that the BAFTAs have shone a light on makes zero sense as a standalone issue. Unless you’re going to also speak out about the harm black people faced in hearing those words, and the racist backlash they have then faced for speaking out about said harm. Because the issue here is the BBC exploiting one issue to stir up another.

you condemn those speaking of tourette’s in a negative matter and stay silent about the rampant racism this event has unleashed, because it makes you uncomfortable to realize you aren’t as nuanced as you believed you were.

— helena (@wannabespiced) March 1, 2026

But it all seems to be a game to the BBC. Do the bosses care about anything more than clicks and views?

Clearly, the British public service broadcaster places more value on causing an absolute shitstorm of racism by exploiting a man’s disability than it does on keeping their presenters and viewers safe. So why are they still getting the license fee?

As Jayme Lawson said so perfectly:

You want to celebrate our art, but you won’t protect it.

Feature image via BETNetworks/ YouTube

Today, UK defence minister John Healey spoke to Laura Kuenssberg, answering questions relating to the war of aggression on Iran which has seen its’ supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei assassinated. Widespread reports have further confirmed that a number of Iranian officials were also murdered.

Healey’s opening line was to suggest that ‘no one will mourn’ the death of Khamenei. It’s important to note, we condemn the oppressive acts of Khamenei on his own citizens. It is obvious, as in any state, there will be those who will cheer their leader’s downfall. However, it is arguably a deliberate lie from our defence minister to manufacture consent that is not supported by video evidence.

It’s hard to imagine Western society responding well when someone openly says they would feel no sympathy over the death of a public figure, no matter how controversial that person may be. For example, after the assassination of Charlie Kirk last year, critics quickly condemned those who suggested that Kirk’s own rhetoric had contributed to the hostility directed at him.

Once again, double standards are exposed in the West. And those double standards have a racist undertone.

Iran has begun 40 days of mourning after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in ongoing attacks by the United States and Israel, according to Iranian state media https://t.co/OD5V3wh2x7 pic.twitter.com/DmbFLOGCaA

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 1, 2026

Iranians mourning Khameneipic.twitter.com/kS7tPNE6ej

— Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 (@jacksonhinklle) March 1, 2026

‘Revenge’ calls and deep grief on display after Khamenei assassination, not alleged civil uprising

Mainstream media across the West has spoken of the significant likelihood that Iranians would rise up and overthrow their government once US and Israeli attacks apparently ‘cleared the way’. Today, across UK news outlets, references are made to Iranians supposedly jumping for joy and showing gratitude for the widespread attacks on Iran. Those attacks have already resulted in a majority of deaths being amongst women and girls, with bombs hitting a primary school killing around 150 schoolgirls, as well as a sports hall which sheltered a women’s volleyball team which killed 20. 

Arguably confirming those civilian deaths were apparently deliberate, Trump celebrated the assassination posting on Truth Social. He stated:

He [Khamenei] was unable to avoid our Intelligence and Highly Sophisticated Tracking Systems and, working closely with Israel, there was not a thing he, or the other leaders that have been killed along with him, could do.

This is the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country.

The heavy and pinpoint bombing, however, will continue, uninterrupted throughout the week or, as long as necessary to achieve our objective.

Contrary to Western ‘saviour’ attitudes, reports across the Middle East show widespread grief with women, men and young girls seen visibly weeping. Whilst we have seen happier celebrations too, looking at the sheer numbers showing deep, continuing faith in their murdered Ayatollah shouldn’t be diminished.

Footage you won’t be shown on Western media today:

Mass mourning in Tehran’s Enghelab’s Square to mourn the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei.

Advertisement

The US and Israel said Iranians would take to the streets and overthrow their government if the leadership was killed…

Instead… https://t.co/9h6APXnEJ8 pic.twitter.com/zqeo0GmhAm

— Going Underground (@GUnderground_TV) March 1, 2026

The post in full reads:

Footage you won’t be shown on Western media today:

Mass mourning in Tehran’s Enghelab’s Square to mourn the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei.

The US and Israel said Iranians would take to the streets and overthrow their government if the leadership was killed…

Instead they have taken to the streets to rally around the flag and mobilise.

And significant mourning seen from his followers in India:

📍Kargil, India 🇮🇳 Mourning the Martyrdom of Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, The Supreme Leader of Iran. pic.twitter.com/RLximdNxJb

— Muhammed Arshad (@Martyrs_lover) March 1, 2026

Many have sought to diminish reports as ‘old videos’, with many coming out to refute that allegation:

Live shot from Shiraz on anti-Iran Qatar’s Al Jazeera – for those who keep insisting that the vast crowds in Iranian cities mourning @khamenei_ir and demanding revenge are “old videos” pic.twitter.com/Nr8HdbZTmk

— Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) March 1, 2026

Khamenei didn’t run and hide like Netanyahu

Possibly indicating why he was respected by his followers, this report from Al Jazeera suggests the Ayatollah continued his work refusing to run and hide. This draws a contrast to reports that Netanyahu ran like a coward to Germany when he started this war with Iran. A war which has seen retaliatory attacks from Iran on Israelis and Palestinians in the Occupied territories, whilst Gaza has been sealed off. 

BREAKING: Iran’s Fars and Tasnim news agencies say Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed at his office early Saturday while “performing his assigned duties.”

A 40-day period of public mourning has been declared. pic.twitter.com/wpVQOQpSIU

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 1, 2026

Russian President Putin has recognised the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Stating the murder was ‘cynical’, pictures have shown him honouring Khamenei by placing flowers in his memory in Moscow. We’re sure Putin is happy to see the West increasingly abandon the rule of law. Especially as the current rhetoric suggests aggressors decide if their acts are illegal: not its victims or allies.

🚨 Heavy mourning worldwide Russian President Vladimir Putin places flowers in Moscow to honor Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei. pic.twitter.com/d5RKFik2Yo

— Hon Nuhu Sada (@NuhuSada0) March 1, 2026

Advertisement

Khamenei had clearly been an oppressive leader over those who he deemed ‘dissenters’. The immeasurable pain his abuse of power has inflicted is reflected in the X post below.

The Islamic Republic tortured an 87-year-old woman into a confession.

Her only “crime” was mourning her nephew, who was killed by the regime.

In her grief, she cursed Ali Khamenei and the forces responsible for taking his life.

Advertisement

It is standard practice for the Islamic Republic… pic.twitter.com/EvJz3PJq4g

— The Iran Watcher 🇮🇷 (@TheIranWatcher) February 9, 2026

Hypocrites: Do as the US and Israel say, not as they do

However, bombs falling on schools and sports halls hardly makes Israel and the US superior in their regard for human life and civil freedoms in Iran. These extraterritorial attacks have clearly triggered a deeper sense of loyalty and increased resistance to Western aggression amongst Iranians and followers across the region. This is hardly creating conditions for change, and far more likely to set conditions for all-out war in the Middle East.

Thankfully there are Western figures who are widely respected, who have called out the attacks for what they are. They have also recognised the rights inherent to Iran in light of widespread bombings across its territory. Your Party MP Zarah Sultana reminded us of Iran’s right under international law, provoking danger across multiple regions in light of this hostile aggression against its territory:

Under international law, Iran has the right to defend itself from unprovoked and illegal attacks.

This is US imperialist aggression, plain and simple. https://t.co/oObYj5mSJd

— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) February 28, 2026

Law must be objective, not selective

Attempts to hail the assassination of Khamenei are across western media. They are working hard to convince the public that it was a ‘righteous act’ by the US and Israel. An aggressive act that came in answer to calls from Iranians miserable and oppressed under Iran’s IRGC regime. However, evidence does not support the suggestion that ‘few will mourn’ his assassination.

Also, moral superiority is increasingly short-lived when we look honestly at our own government’s behaviour, and that of our staunch allies. Instead, the arrogant ignorance of the west is likely to exacerbate the calls for vengeance amongst his followers.

This will likely be bad news for all civilians around the world as we see the rule of law diluted beyond all meaning.

Featured image via Aljazeera

‘What do you wish people asked you about more?’

‘What was your family like when you were growing up?’

‘What did the world expect from you when you were young?’

FG Trade via Getty Images

‘When you look at the world now, how does it feel to you?’

‘Is there anything you still feel responsible for passing on?’

‘What feels good in our relationship right now? What doesn’t?’

It’s astonishing how many experts on international law there seem to be. They all seem to know it, chapter and verse assume that any action taken by the USA or Israel must, by definition, breach international law. And that tells you all you need to know about their motivations.

Of course they can never provide any detail of which clause of which treaty they are talking about. Quiz them and then they start spluttering about the UN. As if the UN is the arbiter of when a nation is justified in taking miliary action against another.

I make no pretence to be an expert in international law. Why would I? I’m not even a domestic lawyer, let alone an international one. I do know, however, that launching a military attack on one nation by another does not necessarily mean that it is illegal. Self defence and pre-emptive self-defence can be totally justified. Both Israel and the USA have been attacked by Iran, and Iran has been guilty of issuing almost daily bellicose threats to both countries with its leaders’ constant mantras of ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel’. It is somewhat ironic that having continually chanted those words, Ayatollah Khomeini suffered ‘Death FROM America’.

I see some people arguing that all the Iranian regime wanted was peace and it was no threat to anyone. Seriously, that’s what some are saying, trying to keep a straight face at the same time. Iran has been a threat to both Israel and the USA ever since the 1979 revolution, yet some people seem to like ignoring the basic facts of history. A simple internet search provides all the evidence you need.

Article 51 of the UN Charter states: “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs…”. In addition, it can also be argued that an attack is justified if an attack is imminent and unavoidable. Any international lawyer worth their salt would be able to argue this is exactly the scenario here, given Iran’s current and planned ballistic missile capabilities.

Where there is more doubt is about the legality of targeting a head of state for assassination. International law leaves less room for interpretation here, but I still think there is a good case to argue, given Khameni was Commander in Chief and therefor the presidential palace, where he met his maker, was a justifiable military target.

The UK government’s response has been timid, tepid and embarrassing. As George W Bush said after 9/11: “You’re either with us, or you’re on the side of the terrorists”. Simplistic maybe, but sitting on the fence should never be an option for a country like Britain. Starmer did take a stance of sorts by refusing to let American bombers take off from Diego Garcia or RAF Fairford. All he has done since then is to call on Iran not to respond to the attacks and for things to de-escalate. How courageous.

If both the Australian and New Zealand prime ministers can issue statements of support and understanding for the US/Israeli actions, why can’t ours? After all, we currently hold the presidency of the UN Security Council, so it is surely important that we state our position clearly. Either we are for the action or we’re not. Both positions can be justified. Sitting on the fence and displaying the weakness of a wobbling jelly cannot.

The Prime Minister should come before the House of Commons tomorrow and state his position very clearly. Kemi Badenoch, Ed Davey, Zack Polanski and Nigel Farage have all stated their positions very clearly. It’s about time Keir Starmer did the same, rather than hide behind the well-trodden path of saying ‘well on the one hand’. Show some leadership, Prime Minister.

On Trevor Phillips this morning, UK defence minister John Healey condemned ‘indiscriminate’ attacks on Bahrain by Iran. This is despite widespread reports confirming it was a US military base. However, Healey said nothing about the blatant indiscriminate attacks by Israel that have brutally murdered almost 150 women and children, bombing a girls’ elementary school in Iran.

Nevertheless, it’s no surprise as he seems perfectly happy to ignore the flagrant breach of international law in the US and Israel’s war of aggression on Iran. He even went so far as to suggest that the regime ‘lashing out’ in the Middle East is Iran.

Apparently murdering dozens of schoolgirls isn’t illegal in the eyes of our defence minister.

“When you get a regime like this [Iran], lashing out in the Middle East, indiscriminately and widely, hitting civilian as well as military targets”

This is the UK defence minister talking about an illegal and unprovoked attack *on Iran* pic.twitter.com/ghsUbGx8nM

Advertisement

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026

John Healey: US-Israeli bombing campaign is a ‘positive action’

In the interview, Healey was asked about the legality and legitimacy of the unexpected attack by Israel and the US on Iran. He didn’t state it was legal, clearly wary to show that level of support, but notably said he didn’t disagree with Phillips that the act was ‘positive’. Unsurprisingly, Phillips failed to bring up the Israeli bombing of a girls’ school in Iran, most of those killed between the ages of 7 and 12.

The double standard is hard to ignore, as Saul Staniforth highlighted on X:

John Healey: “The answer to the question of, is the US action legal, that is for the US to set out & explain, its not for me as a defence secretary of the UK”

So its up to Russia to say whether its invasion of Ukraine was legal or not, & you don’t have an opinion, right? pic.twitter.com/72gUnKYwtf

Advertisement

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026

As a result, it’s hard to avoid the painful reality that it appears John Healey either is undisturbed by the majority of those murdered being women and children in Iran on day one.

Or is his omission indirectly confirming the attack by Israel and supported by the US was ‘discriminate’ so deliberately? Given the advanced technology that has been on clear display from Israel in its brutal genocide on Palestine and acts of aggression on Lebanon, it’s incredibly hard to accept it as ‘accidental’.

Just hours after we reported the US is moving forward with a $260+ million sale of kits that make bombs more “precise,” Israeli forces have bombed a school, killing more than 80 people — with the help of “precise arming” https://t.co/VLSvd8DNn6 pic.twitter.com/odoVflLkex

— Prem Thakker (@prem_thakker) August 10, 2024

Advertisement

According to international law, the Israel-US attack on Iran represents an illegal, unprovoked and aggressive act. In light of that, Iran very much has the legal right to defend itself. This is why it is ever more crucial for western leaders to remember the rule of law to prevent this escalating even further across the region. After all, I can’t imagine a western leader would hold back if a girls’ school had been bombed on our own territory.

John Healey refuses to say if the UK will join the US & Israel in bombing Iran. I guess we don’t have a right to know if our govt is planning to take us to war.

And as for #trevorphillips calling bombing Iran a positive action rather than an offensive action. That says it all. pic.twitter.com/zpPdZYkk5h

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026

.@ZackPolanski: The US & Israel attack is illegal and unprovoked, the defence secretary & the govt won’t condemn it, we have a PM who is incapable of standing up to Trump, and the worry is that we’ll be pulled into another illegal war.

Spot on. pic.twitter.com/EGFSnu0v1s

Advertisement

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 1, 2026

Selective condemnation

This should come as no surprise that our leaders seem reluctant to defend and uphold international law. They’ve done so ever since October 7th, 2023, refusing to step on the wrong side of the rogue US President.

We wrote yesterday about Thornberry’s surprise recollection of the rule of law, declaring the attack on Iran was ‘illegal’. Whilst it’s a positive development, it also highlights how selective western government officials are in determining legality of military campaigns conducted by allies.

Our own Joe Glenton wrote:

She’s not entirely wrong. The strikes are illegal and ill-advised. Their consequences are likely to be severe not just for the wider region, but also for the global economy.

But still, there are a couple of thorny issues we must first address.

Thornberry has herself previously defended Israel’s genocidal misconduct in Gaza. In 2024, when asked on BBC if Israel cutting off food and electricity in Gaza was “within international law”:

Thornberry, with a straight-face, said:

I think Israel has an absolute right to defend itself against terrorism…

Advertisement

One could be forgiven for thinking he meant Israel because it is the ONLY regime “lashing out in the Middle East indiscriminately and widely, hitting civilian as well as military targets”. https://t.co/PxYJvjZQUA

— Karyn Taylor-Moore (@TaylorMooreK) March 1, 2026

Let’s be clear, Donald Trump and the Epstein class that have enabled genocide in Gaza are now blowing up Iranian children and setting the Middle East on fire to enrich themselves and cover up their paedophilic crimes.

We need to build a mass movement to stop them.

— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) February 28, 2026

We do not consent to WWIII

Thankfully, many more have been loud in their condemnation of these attacks and those who had been complicit in Gaza are stepping out of turn with their colleagues, such as Thornberry. Once again, as we saw with the genocide on Gaza, ordinary people are overwhelmingly able to understand the rule of law without a need to selectively apply it. This highlights that those who have power have precious little sense of principle.

As Zarah Sultana stated on X, we need a mass movement to stop the world careening into WWIII and we need that now.

Featured image via the Canary

Social media users have responded with blistering incredulity, outrage and bitter mockery to a US interviewer asking a spokesman why Iran is bombing US bases. His response:

Um, because you’re bombing us from those bases? What do you want me to say?

NBC news anchors asked Iran why it’s justifying attacks on American bases in the region.

“Um, because you’re bombing us from those bases? What do you want me to say? ” pic.twitter.com/P8pZU4L5Ix

— ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ (@LePapillonBlu2) March 1, 2026

Could anything better sum up the dishonesty and stupidity of western media and the entitled arrogance of the US? Even US respondents thought so too:

OK, the person who asked that question – are they a certified fucking idiot? If not, they are a certified, fucking idiot! Lord help us from all these certified fucking idiots.

— IAmMe (@IAmINTJ1) March 1, 2026

Who writes these dumbass questions?

— Michael J Box (@okanaganchild) March 1, 2026

Which right wing oligarch owns NBC.

— Robert Beattie🇦🇺🌏🌊💙🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺🇨🇦🇵🇦 (@beattiers_1958) March 1, 2026

Seriously? That was a fucking question? I guess they think all countries should just let us bomb them and not fight back?

— Turboe4truth 🇺🇸🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇺🇦 (@turboe4truth) March 1, 2026

Advertisement

Others pointed out how the idiot question entirely fits within the usual western ‘mainstream’ media framing of western imperialism and aggression:

pic.twitter.com/DLeAzMuWfk

— Varangian of the South Seas (@SouthVarangian) March 1, 2026

pic.twitter.com/jC9QCgFBlJ

— V a n a m o n d e 🌙 (@Vanamonde5) March 1, 2026

Which right wing oligarch owns NBC.

— Robert Beattie🇦🇺🌏🌊💙🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺🇨🇦🇵🇦 (@beattiers_1958) March 1, 2026

Advertisement

They are pro-Israel just like our shitty government. What the fuck kind of question is that to even ask? Like, how can anyone watch this shit and take it seriously?

— Blayzn Baddie 💋🌹💨 (@BlazynBaddie) March 1, 2026

Teleprompter: why Iran attacks civilian targets in the region gaining new enemies while being totally hammered by 🇮🇱 🇺🇸?
Anchors….🤯 pic.twitter.com/jZbCM0iWQl

— Don Pedro (@DonPedro_s) March 1, 2026

That news anchor is trying to whip up some manufactured consent. They know the truth but is trying to get Iran to say something they can spin. 🙄

— a succulent bread sandwich meal (@BeefFace80) March 1, 2026

The propaganda in the mainstream media is astounding.

— Alina 🌻 (@alinamercedes) March 1, 2026

Advertisement

But among the many sane respondents, just a few demonstrated that some parts of the US population are no less stupid or blinkered than the media that spoon-feeds them this nonsense. Some were outraged that a spokesman from Iran should be interviewed by US media at all.

Others thought they were being clever by claiming the bombers had come from ships, not from those US bases the ships use. As if in war, you only get to retaliate against the parts of your enemy that are directly involved.

Canary readers please, if you’re ever in a fight and someone punches you with their right hand, you can only hit back on that same right hand — anywhere else is not fair play.

Still others just demonstrated how lacking a gag reflex they are when it comes to swallowing MAGA BS:

That news anchor is trying to whip up some manufactured consent. They know the truth but is trying to get Iran to say something they can spin. 🙄

— a succulent bread sandwich meal (@BeefFace80) March 1, 2026

They’re not – the bombs came from the ships

— Sukicee88 (@sukicee8857454) March 1, 2026

The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.

— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026

And others pointed out how the US allows itself to be led by the nose by the one actual nuclear-armed rogue state in the region:

The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.

— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026

The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.

— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026

You can be anti-trump without necessarily siding with terrorist Iran

— kanagasomu (@gosumabrigade) March 1, 2026

Two corrupt states with nuclear weapons and idiots and liars for bosses and mouthpieces are threatening one that is trying to exist flanked by the nuclear armed idiot-liars. One televised interview question was all it took to (again) put a spotlight on it.

Featured image via the Canary