Burnham and his pivots fall apart when you read the small print

If you’ve tuned into any political news in the last few days, you’ll have heard the official Labour buzzword of the week: pivot.

Prime minister Andy Burnham is apparently swivelling the party left so sharply you’d think he’d just spotted a late bus leaving the station and is sprinting to catch it. He’s promising “a state that isn’t afraid to intervene”, “putting British industry first”, and “fairness for working people”.

I’m sure we have heard this somewhere before…

Pundits are already cooing about a return to roots — like Labour’s forgotten roots were just hiding down the back of the leader’s sofa all this time.

But look past the nicely turned phrases and the perfectly pressed shirt, and this isn’t a revolution. It’s just the same old menu, but with a fancier description on the blackboard.

Let’s give credit where it’s due, if we must.

Burnham: grateful for small mercies?

On paper, it all sounds great. Who wouldn’t cheer for backing our steel mills instead of letting bosses ship jobs abroad to save a few quid? Who’d argue with telling big corporations they can’t hoover up record profits while paying staff so little they qualify for food banks?

It’s the sort of stuff that gets shared a thousand times on Facebook by people who haven’t voted since 2005, nodding along like “at last, someone gets it”.

Then you read the small print — or rather, notice the complete absence of small print on the stuff that actually matters — and it’s like biting into an M&S Gourmet Nut Wellington and finding it’s mostly carrot peel and stewed nettles.

Leaked briefings still talk about “streamlining welfare” — which in Westminster language means something like making life even more miserable for people who’ve already got it tough.

There have been no promises to end sanctions that cut off cash for weeks because someone missed a job centre slot while they were in hospital, or their bus was cancelled — which, let’s be honest, happens most weeks anyway.

And Universal Credit’s infamous six-week wait? Still there, lingering like a bad smell in a bathroomless HMO.

Panic setting in already

On the big stuff? Total silence. Burnham’s said zilch about bringing energy companies into public ownership — the only plan that’d actually stop bills going up faster than a queue at Greggs on a Saturday morning. Nada on closing tax loopholes that let giants like Amazon pay less than your average market stallholder. Nothing about scrapping Trident, even though we could fund every school repair in the country three times over for what that ludicrous white elephant costs.

And it turns out that standing up for ordinary people stops dead the moment it might upset a wealthy donor or a newspaper editor.

This isn’t a pivot. Is it? It’s a panic.

And we’ve seen this act before. Labour won power claiming they’d fix the housing crisis, sort out social care, and the usual nonsense about making work pay.

What has changed? Rents are higher than the roof on my nan’s old council high rise, there are no rent controls in sight, and no-fault evictions are still the greedy landlords’ favourite party trick.

Now we hear 30,000 NHS jobs could go — at the exact same time private firms are trousering millions in outsourcing contracts.

Some will say “give Burnham a chance, he’s only just started, bless him”. Fair enough — but you don’t need six months of policy reviews to scrap a rule that hurts children, right?

You don’t need cross-party talks to arrive at the conclusion that energy belongs to all of us, do you?

And do you really need a focus group to tell you to do the obviously right thing?

Burnham: choosing not to choose

These aren’t tricky administrative puzzles — they’re choices. And right now, Burnham’s choosing not to choose.

Out here in Swindon, in towns across the south west and the north, we don’t care about Westminster wordplay. We care about the neighbour working two zero-hours jobs who still can’t afford to put the heating on.

We care that utter monsters such as Nigel Farage can spout any old rubbish and get called “bold”, while anyone asking for actual change gets dismissed as “unrealistic”.

Burnham might think a few rousing lines will win us back. He might reckon we’re too busy counting pennies for the weekly shop to check if he’s actually delivering. But he’s wrong. We’re not daft. We know the difference between someone who’s turning the ship around, and someone who’s just polishing the brass portholes while it slowly drifts onto the rocks.

We don’t want speeches. We want action. We want a party that’s not scared to pick a side — our side, not the boardroom’s — no fine print, and no last-minute U-turns like the ones that haunted the last Prime Minister, whatever his name was.

Actions speak louder than carefully rehearsed buzzwords — and right now, Burnham’s actions are whispering while his speeches are little more than shouting. This isn’t a bold new journey, it’s just more of the same old drift, with a louder PA system.

At the end of the day, most voters aren’t fooled by sound bites, spin, or fancy pivots. We can all spot a con when we see one. If it looks like the same old Tory-lite soup, tastes like the same old Tory-lite soup, and costs the same old price in our pockets — it really doesn’t matter what label you stick on the tin.

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachael Swindon

Source link