Politics

Country has ‘heard enough from grotesque Blair’ says Polanski

Published

on

Tony Blair is being rightly slammed for his disappointingly common ‘rare’ interventions into British politics. This time, Green Party leader Zack Polanski had a sharp response:

Advertisement

Polanski was far from the only figure in British political life to speak out.

Blair is “grotesque”

In full, Polanski said the following about Blair’s lengthy essay:

I think it was 5,600 words too many. Tony Blair is a former prime minister who dragged this country into an illegal war in Iraq.

I think it’s pretty grotesque to see him selling the future of our children and grandchildren down the river through the kind of climate delay tactics, talking down clean energy and the security that we need.

I just don’t think this is a sensible intervention in a day where we’re speaking in these extreme temperatures, to have someone who should hold a position of responsibility or a former position of responsibility to be speaking like this.

Advertisement

Polanski wasn’t the only Green to slam the slimy toad:

Advertisement

Polanski did receive some pushback from the dead-eyed media shills who fawned over Blair’s rambling right-wing screed:

Advertisement

And, this is what the man himself looked like when he later defended his call to ramp up fossil fuel production:

Advertisement

Media fawning

On 27 May, we reported:

Advertisement

Historically, people in Britain said there is ‘nothing certain but death and taxes.‘ At this point, the third inevitability we can add is ‘disgraced war criminal Tony Blair will stick his oar in, and the media will describe it as an ‘unprecedented intervention.”

You’re not going to believe this, but the mainstream media would spend much of yesterday describing the predictable intervention as being somewhat unpredictable.

Advertisement

Advertisement

As an alternative, here’s what our analyst William Kedjanyi said:

Advertisement

Kedjanyi explained:

The most important part of Tony Blair’s essay that he wrote on his website yesterday is arguably what he didn’t say. The ex-prime minister accused the current one of having no plan, but he didn’t talk about a massive issue in Britain: housing—something which exacerbates so many of the problems we are dealing with today.

​I thought that was extraordinary, considering the scope of a 5,700-word piece. Now there’s an awful lot to go into, but crucially we have to acknowledge that the lack of housing impacts everything else, and for him to omit it is a very big thing.

Blair really should be talking about this issue too. House prices quadrupled under him, thanks in part to buy-to-let. This left us with permanently expensive housing, because Blair failed to use the housing boom to build more houses – creating a political issue which has hamstrung every PM since.

The shifting centre

It wasn’t just the media fawning over Blair, tbf – there was also the occasional dipshit like this:

Advertisement

Yes, mate – everyone secretly loves Blair as much as you do; it’s not that your supposedly ‘centrist’ ideology is now a fringe belief in British politics.

Advertisement

Making this point in more detail, Scarlett Maguire noted in April that the political ‘centre’ today is not what it was in 1997:

She added that your modern centrist also:

-dislikes rhetoric that seems too inflammatory
– opposes Trump
– worries about an unstable world and doesn’t want a leader that makes that worse
– wants to see solutions over political point scoring

This is all particularly notable in the case of Tony Blair, because he literally just said the UK should be closer to Trump.

Yo, Blair!

Blair’s insistence that the UK should suck up to Trump is grim but unsurprising. After all, this is the PM who let George W. Bush treat him like his manservant.

Advertisement

Activist Andrew Feinstein described Blair as follows:

Advertisement

Zarah Sultana said this about the sweaty war monger:

Diane Abbott said:

Faiza Shaheen questioned why anyone would ever listen to Blair given the gravity of his crimes in Iraq:

Advertisement

While many have rejected Blair’s Trumpism the British media is trying to sell it as sensible politics:

Advertisement

Advertisement

AI

If you’re wondering why war criminal Tony was so enthusiastic about AI in his essay, we can name at least 200 million reasons:

Advertisement

Sorry, make that £257 million:

Dan Hodges suggested the essay may literally only exist to promote AI, with the non-AI stuff simply there to attract eyeballs:

Someone just pointed out to me, Blair’s article is actually a classic example of “Client Laundering”. He has a number of major AI clients, and if you read the “essay”, it’s peppered with AI references. So he writes an article ostensibly about Labour, gets a huge response, then contacts his clients and says “See, got a really good response to my AI article. All our top lines are in there”.

Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, said the following:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Phony Blair

Economist Yanis Varoufakis was among those who highlighted what Tony Blair’s real priority is – namely Tony Blair. In his response, Varoufakis noted that Blair’s “real innovation” was:

the financialisation of the ex-premiership itself. The Tony Blair Institute, fuelled by £130 million from Oracle’s Larry Ellison—coincidentally, the largest individual donor to the Friends of the IDF—became a shadow state, brokering governance contracts for autocrats and companies like Palantir that weaponise AI to produce mega-death abroad and full-on surveillance of Western populations.

Many added to Varoufakis’s argument, including Feinstein:

Labour MP Ian Byrne said:

It’s crystal clear Tony Blair does not care about the lives of working class people.*

And, this intervention definitely does not speak on their behalf

He speaks for the billionaire class, vested interests and the status quo with the aim of protecting their wealth and power, much like his great friend Peter Mandelson.

Advertisement

His institute are bankrolled by big tech and corporate interests, not the 99% struggling through austerity, insecurity and inequality.

Completion

We’re going to end with the following from Richard Burgon:

This is why Blair’s project will never be complete, and it’s also why he will keep feeling a need to intervene.

The only positive in all this is that the backlash against him only seems to be growing with each new intervention.

Advertisement

Featured image via Pool (Getty Images) / Ryan Jenkinson (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Trending

Exit mobile version