Connect with us

Politics

Farage Defiant Despite Reform’s Conference Growing Pains

Published

on

Nigel Farage Defiant Despite Reform’s Growing Pains On Show At Difficult Conference
Nigel Farage Defiant Despite Reform’s Growing Pains On Show At Difficult Conference

Nigel Farage speaks at the Reform UK conference, Birmingham, September 5, 2026 (PA Images / Alamy)


4 min read

“Are you ready for some common sense?” Lee Anderson asked the party faithful as he delivered the opening speech of Reform’s annual conference on Friday lunchtime. “Well, you’ve come to the right place.”

Advertisement

But in truth the party chairman was papering over the cracks of an event that had already started to unravel, kicking off with a ‘business day‘ that upset its corporate class, followed by the suspensions of two senior party figures over allegations they had arranged donations that broke electoral rules.

Things didn’t get any better for Reform at the NEC in Birmingham as questions thrown up by the investigation broadcast on Channel 4 dogged its senior figures. After multiple delays and disruptions to his first speech on Friday, Nigel Farage seemed relieved when he stepped off stage for the final time on Saturday afternoon, having closed proceedings with his second address to members.

A party figure dismissed these concerns, pointing out that it was the biggest conference they had ever put on, and reporting that feedback had been overwhelmingly positive from businesses and the rank and file.

Advertisement

But if the aim of the conference was to shift focus away from recent scandals and towards plans for the first 100 days of a Reform government, then it is unlikely to be deemed successful by many.

While previous Reform events had largely been extended rallies, the aim this year was to further professionalise the party’s apparatus and create conferences to rival those of Labour and the Conservatives. Reform is still experiencing the growing pains of an insurgent movement becoming a mainstream political force, however.

The Birmingham conference opened with a much-criticised business day on Thursday and the broadcast of the Channel 4 documentary into party donations. Although initially labelled a “hoax” by the party, on Friday morning Farage’s longtime aide Dan Jukes and the party’s head of policy, Cambridge professor James Orr, stepped down over the investigative report.

Advertisement

Even the way this unfolded became a source of contention, highlighting splits in the party when Anderson said the two men were “not coming back” and others said they had merely been suspended pending an investigation.

When asked about the matter, Robert Jenrick appeared to split the difference, saying Jukes and Orr had been “permanently suspended”.

Farage himself came out swinging, insisting they had been victims of entrapment and had done nothing illegal, referring to it as “a little local difficulty”.

But it undoubtedly cast a pall over events in Birmingham. At a press conference with French far-right politician Jordan Bardella, after he and Farage had signed a flagship “memorandum of understanding” aimed at stopping small boat crossings forever, every question directed at the Reform leader was about the donations scandal instead.

Advertisement

National Rally president Bardella – whose tub-thumping speech on the merits of patriotism won over an initially sceptical audience, threatening to make him the breakout star of conference – watched on as Farage read out a pre-prepared written statement. Comments made by Jukes and Orr in the report were, Farage said, simply “loose pub talk”.

The Reform leader’s afternoon went from bad to worse after his speech was delayed for an hour due to security concerns, then interrupted on five separate occasions by climate protesters. The police are now investigating claims that the disruptors were assaulted while being removed from the auditorium.

Party members in attendance did not appear bothered. The latest development in the Reform donations scandal was yet another attempt to “smear” the party, according to two young activists who spoke to PoliticsHome. It was “just a stitch-up by the media establishment”, said a Reform councillor.

Reform officials similarly sought to play down the significance of the investigation, as well as the teething problems of hosting a big event. They made the case on Saturday that the story had faded in importance, allowing Jenrick to deliver his big new tax policy.

Advertisement

In his first address to conference since defecting from the Conservatives, the party’s economic spokesman announced that he would raise the tax-free personal allowance to £15,000 within the first 100 days of a Reform government.

A Jenrick adviser said Farage had dealt with the donations story, allowing them “to get a hearing” on a policy they were excited about, describing it as a “wedge in between Labour and the Tories” on taxation.

After Jenrick’s speech, Farage made an unannounced appearance on the Reform livestream alongside presenter Jeremy Kyle, looking relaxed ahead of his own closing speech. Despite fears protesters could disrupt him again, he romped through his thank-yous and sent the remaining members home in high spirits.

Insisting on his prediction that Andy Burnham will call an early election within months, Farage wanted to land the message that Reform is ready for government and would be able to force through its policy agenda after an election win. But while conference may have ended with an enthusiastic rendition of the national anthem, lingering doubts are yet to be drowned out.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Politics Home | Business Leaders Left Disappointed By Reform UK Conference After “Disaster” Dinner And Donations Row

Published

on

Business Leaders Left Disappointed By Reform UK Conference After “Disaster” Dinner And Donations Row
Business Leaders Left Disappointed By Reform UK Conference After “Disaster” Dinner And Donations Row

Members of the Reform Party watch Jeremy Kyle interview Nigel Farage at the Reform UK conference, Birmingham, September 2026 (Credit: SOPA Images Limited/Alamy Live News)


4 min read

Business leaders and stakeholders have told PoliticsHome that they have been left frustrated by Reform UK’s annual party conference in Birmingham.

Advertisement

Business leaders said they had been left “unimpressed” with Reform UK’s engagement at the conference, with one saying they felt “talked at, not conversed with”.

One business source said they “couldn’t find a single Reform person” throughout the business day. 

Stakeholders from the business world are keen to establish relationships with Reform and understand its key policies as it continues to position itself as the next party of government.

Advertisement

But some said they left the Birmingham conference on Saturday questioning how much the party still values its relationship with business.

“It was very, very difficult for business to network,” the same source said. “There were two or three networking receptions at the end of the day which turned out not to exist.”

Reform UK is engulfed in a row over allegations that it broke UK electoral rules via donations from foreign actors.

A report broadcast by Channel 4 on Thursday appeared to show Reform leader Nigel Farage and close allies discussing a potential £500,000 donation and the acceptance of over £30,000 for “off-the-books” polling.

Advertisement

Reform has now suspended its head of policy, James Orr, and Dan Jukes, a close aide of Farage, and launched an internal investigation into the matter.

Business leaders said the row had cast a shadow over the conference – made worse by a business dinner on Thursday evening, held an hour after the report aired, that was described by one attendee as a “disaster”.

Billed at £395 plus VAT a head, the business dinner at Reform’s conference had been sold as a “rare opportunity to engage directly with key figures” from the party.

Advertisement

Guests were promised “dedicated time for meaningful, high-level conversation” with senior Reform figures and that each table would include two senior members of Reform.

But several attendees told PoliticsHome that their tables had no Reform representatives and that they received no engagement from the representatives at the dinner. 

“If you don’t have enough party advisers, council leaders or politicians to host a table, don’t sell me a ticket. I was sat next to an empty chair and nobody from the party did the rounds. A little bit more would have gone a long way, but this was a high cost that will be avoided in future,” one senior consultant told PoliticsHome

Reform has disputed these claims, insisting that 30 of the 31 tables included a party representative.

Advertisement

A business source told PoliticsHome that the experience had been particularly disappointing given the amount businesses had paid to attend, and another claimed that guests who arrived just five minutes late were turned away and refused entry to the dinner.

There were also complaints about the entertainment, with attendees saying the band playing was so loud that it was difficult to hear conversations at their tables. One attendee said the experience was best summed up by the water, describing it as tasting “like chlorine”. 

“If that’s how they run a conference day for business, I don’t know how they’re going to run an entire country,” a business source said.

Another complained that the conference was a “shitshow”, citing scheduling delays on Friday and a chaotic registration process at the entrance.

Advertisement

A businessman attending the conference told PoliticsHome that they were “bitterly disappointed” and that, if Reform were a business instead of a political party, it would have “gone under long ago”. 

Complainants reported being so disappointed by the experience that they had resolved not to attend next year.

Another consultant said one of their clients who attended the dinner had already decided to scale back their involvement next year, opting to send junior representatives from the business instead.

Gawain Towler, a member of Reform’s governing board, was asked by PoliticsHome about the complaints by businesspeople.

Advertisement

“I didn’t get that feedback, so it’s hard to respond,” he said. “Say that is the case. It’s the first time we have done it. Next year, it will be better because we learn. We never learn from being perfect. You learn from making mistakes.”

Responding to the complaints, a Reform spokesman said: “At this year’s inaugural Business Day Dinner we hosted almost 400 people who had the opportunity to network with Reform politicians and staff as well as hear from party leader Nigel Farage who declared that the door was open to business. 

“We have had overwhelming feedback from attendees and have received no official complaints about the event but are sorry to hear second-hand that some guests experienced issues.”

Additional reporting by Zoe Crowther and Matilda Martin

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The media’s sinister crusade against Reform

Published

on

The media’s sinister crusade against Reform

The post The media’s sinister crusade against Reform appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform’s critics are weaponising electoral law

Published

on

Reform’s critics are weaponising electoral law

What is happening to Reform UK right now, from a legal perspective, is alarming. Reform is the breakout party of the moment. A party that has come from nothing to threaten the exhausted duopoly that has long dominated UK politics. Now, rather than defeat Reform in a battle of ideas, it appears that there is a solid constituency within the political and media class that wants them defeated through the law.

The current scandal centres on a documentary, produced by a group called Verbatim and Channel 4 News, broadcast on Thursday evening. It claims that Reform arranged for what it thought was a US firm to pay for three polls it commissioned earlier this year. Under electoral rules, parties are forbidden from accepting donations from non-UK sources.

The purported donor, posing as the UK-based son of an American financier, was actually an investigative reporter. James Orr and Dan Jukes – the two senior aides from Reform who were secretly recorded meeting with the seeming donors – have since stepped down. In other footage, Jukes appeared to discuss a way in which the party could receive £500,000 from the same supposed US-based source.

Advertisement

The footage has provoked a particularly excited reaction among our anti-Reform political and media elites. Above all, they have demanded the authorities take action. In response to these calls to intervene, the Metropolitan Police is said to be assessing the case.

So what exactly is Reform alleged to have done? Section 54 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 prohibits a party from accepting a donation where ‘the person by whom the donation would be made is not, at the time of its receipt by the party, a permissible donor’. In this case, the fictitious donor, being based in the US, would be impermissible.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reform’s many pursuers claim that, in commissioning the polling, the party received a donation from a source it knew to be impermissible. The relevant offences concerning acceptance of an impermissible donation depend upon the receipt and subsequent treatment of that donation by the party. Lawyers will probably argue that payment for the polling constituted a donation to the party, given that the polling was commissioned by Reform and seemingly provided it with a benefit. After all, Electoral Commission guidance expressly recognises the payment of party expenses and sponsorship of studies or research as capable of amounting to donations.

But with respect to the £500,000, the picture is less clear. Reform never received the money. Reform’s detractors may instead point to Section 61 of the act, which criminalises knowingly entering into, or doing an act in furtherance of, an arrangement which facilitates or is likely to facilitate the making of a donation by an impermissible donor. Now, we haven’t seen all the evidence yet, but to claim that anyone in Reform entered into such an ‘arrangement’ on the basis of what we have seen so far is a stretch.

Advertisement

Even if Orr and Jukes were involved in discussing how the law could hypothetically be circumvented, that is not necessarily enough to establish the offence. A criminal prosecution would have to prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. Merely discussing the possibility of breaking the law, or describing how it might be done, is not in itself necessarily criminal. The prosecution would have to prove that someone knowingly entered into, or acted in furtherance of, an arrangement of the kind prohibited by Section 61.

The law in this area is convoluted. Whether there is sufficient evidence for any prosecution will depend on the full recordings and surrounding evidence, much of which is not yet public.

But none of this really matters to the broader point. Those calling for a police investigation and prosecution are not really interested in the dispassionate application of electoral law. They are weaponising the law for political ends.

Advertisement

Reform has suffered, and will continue to suffer, the political consequences of what has been revealed. Maybe it will hurt its electoral chances; maybe it won’t. But those gleefully demanding the police effectively destroy a popular political party are setting a very dark precedent.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage Offers New Excuse Over Reform Funding Dispute

Published

on

Nigel Farage Offers New Excuse Over Reform Funding Dispute

Nigel Farage has said he “wasn’t even listening” at a meeting he attended with an undercover journalist claiming to be an American donating money to Reform UK.

The party leader has insisted no laws have been broken after a Channel 4 News report showed senior Reform figures discussing how to disguise donations from foreign sources.

Accepting donations from a foreign company, including donations in kind such as polling, could constitute a criminal offence, and the party has been reported to the police.

Two of Farage’s closest aides, Dan Jukes and James Orr, have been suspended by the party pending an internal investigation into the row.

Advertisement

Secretly-recorded footage showed Farage and Jukes having lunch during the recent Clacton by-election with the journalist claiming to be the wealthy American, and another man pretending to be his UK-based son.

The “American” is heard discussing how he paid for polling via his son, and Farage is heard thanking them both.

The Reform leader said the polling was “amazing” and provided “bang for buck”, adding: “It worked. Boom.”

When the discussion turned to a larger donation to Reform, one of the undercover journalists explained that the money would be paid by the US-based father to his son in the UK, who would then pass it on to the party.

Advertisement

Such an arrangement would be illegal under electoral law.

Farage is heard saying “it’s all above board” before later adding: “Thank you. Both of you, thank you.”

But speaking to the BBC on the final day of Reform’s conference in Birmingham, Farage insisted he had not been paying attention to what was being discussed at the lunch.

He said: “I am not a compliance officer. I was in the middle of canvassing in the Clacton by-election. I turn up. I frankly wasn’t even listening.

Advertisement

“ I just asked, “Is it all above board?” I was just there to come and say hello.”

Farage added: “I was told there was a global family office based in London, so the money could have come from Singapore. The money could come from all over the world, you know. Income could have came from all over the world into a family office based in London.

“I know electoral law. I know donation law better than anybody. Frankly [Jukes and Orr] have never been involved in fundraising before and they shouldn’t have been involved directly in fundraising. They should have done basic checks and nobody, nobody should be brought to me, unless they’ve been vetted.”

The row over the Channel 4 report has overshadowed Reform’s annual conference, which had been billed as setting out the party’s plans for its first 100 days in office.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Antihistamines For PMDD: Why People Are Using Allergy Meds For PMDD Symptoms

Published

on

Antihistamines For PMDD: Why People Are Using Allergy Meds For PMDD Symptoms

According to the International Association for Premenstrual Disorders UK (IAPMD UK), around a million people in the UK suffer with Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). PMDD is a more intense version of premenstrual syndrome, characterised by symptoms such as depression, extreme irritability or anger, joint and muscle aches and sharp mood swings, just to name a few.

While we still have a long way to go with awareness, according to Google Trends data, the condition has grown in Google searches since 2024 and this year, the IAMPD was launched, marking it the first charity dedicated to PMDD research in the UK.

According to the NHS, treatments for PMDD can include antidepressants, anti-inflammatory medicines, hormonal treatments such as the pill and talking therapies such as CBT. Anecdotally, increasing my Citalopram prescription by 10mg made a world of difference to my own symptoms.

Strangely, though, according to Dr Suzanne Wylie, GP and medical adviser for IQdoctor, people are increasingly suggesting that antihistamines may be the answer to tackling PMDD symptoms.

Advertisement

Why more women are turning to antihistamines for PMDD

Dr Wylie says: “The growing interest in antihistamines for symptoms associated with PMDD reflects a much wider issue in women’s health, rather than a treatment approach currently supported by robust clinical evidence.

“Increasingly, women are sharing experiences online of using medications traditionally prescribed for allergies in the hope of relieving symptoms including anxiety, mood changes, flushing, headaches and fatigue. While some individuals report subjective improvements, there is currently insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend antihistamines.”

However, while there isn’t enough evidence to recommend them, there is some logic as to why people have turned to them and potentially found relief.

Advertisement

Dr Wylie says: “There are plausible biological theories that may help explain why this approach has attracted attention. Sex hormones such as oestrogen and progesterone interact with the immune system and may influence histamine release and mast cell activity in some individuals.

“Histamine can affect blood vessels, the nervous system and inflammatory pathways, prompting researchers to investigate whether these mechanisms could contribute to some symptoms experienced during hormonal fluctuations. However, these are still areas of scientific investigation, and a plausible biological mechanism”

So, should we take antihistamines for PMDD?

Dr Wylie advises speaking to your GP if you think you may have PMDD, saying: “Symptoms attributed to PMDD can sometimes have other causes. Persistent fatigue, headaches, changes in mood, sleep disturbance or palpitations, for example, may warrant assessment rather than being assumed to be hormonal.

Advertisement

“Seeking appropriate medical advice can help ensure that other conditions are considered and that patients are offered treatments with a stronger evidence base.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | Reform UK Divided Over How To Tackle Challenge Of Increasingly Split Right-Wing Vote

Published

on

Reform UK Divided Over How To Tackle Challenge Of Increasingly Split Right-Wing Vote
Reform UK Divided Over How To Tackle Challenge Of Increasingly Split Right-Wing Vote

Reform’s Matthew Goodwin in January 2024 (Alamy)


6 min read

As Reform UK prepares for the next general election, the right-wing vote is splitting – and the party is divided over how to deal with the challenge.

Advertisement

When members and senior party figures gathered for Reform conference in Birmingham last year, the party was high in the polls and still riding the wave of council election victories in May.

But as new Prime Minister Andy Burnham enjoys a bounce in the polls, Reform’s 2026 gathering takes place during an apparent dip in its popularity, as well as amid allegations that it broke political donation rules.

Another electoral challenge has also been discussed at Reform’s conference: the problem of the right-wing vote becoming increasingly fragmented. 

Advertisement

Research from More in Common has revealed that while Reform’s grip on right-wing voters had been far stronger than Labour’s grip on the left-wing vote in the year to March 2026, that picture has flipped in recent months.

Labour has been re-uniting the left – a trend that has only become more apparent since Burnham took over from Keir Starmer – at a time when Reform’s ability to bring the right together has declined. Reform’s share of the combined right vote was 63 per cent in September 2025, but it has now dropped to 50 per cent.

Reform’s struggle with a fractured right-wing bloc is playing out at the ballot box. In Dover last Thursday, a council by-election delivered a shock win for Green candidate Ingrid Dodd after the right-wing vote split three ways between Reform, Restore Britain and the Conservatives.

Advertisement

With the combined right-wing vote receiving a larger share than than the Green and Labour vote, Dover is a result that party figures – including commentator Matthew Goodwin, who was Reform’s unsuccessful Gorton and Denton candidate – have highlighted.

Speaking at a More in Common panel even at Reform conference on Friday, Goodwin warned that the council by-election showed “exactly what is going to happen at the next general election if people on the right don’t wake up”.

“Everybody on the right of politics, everybody who would describe themselves as being anti-establishment, has to understand what is happening today. The left have an inbuilt advantage going into the next general election because the left are much more willing than people on the right to vote tactically,” Goodwin said.

On the same panel, Luke Tryl, the executive director of More in Common, said: “One of the things for Reform to think about is that they will face tactical voting on the left.” He advised that voters are “becoming increasingly savvy about finding the best alternative to the party they want to stop Reform”.

Advertisement

In an interview with PoliticsHome on the eve of conference, senior Reform figure and leader of Kent county council Linden Kemkaran said some voters have “taken their eye off the ball” in being “enticed” by Restore Britain.

“Tactical voting today is helping the left, and it is hurting the right,” Goodwin told the Reform fringe event. He urged voters on the right to “forget about the individual leaders”, adding: “If the ordinary voters in this country don’t start to vote tactically, we will lose the next general election.”

While both Reform and the Conservatives have publicly rejected the idea of an electoral pact, Goodwin appeared to back the idea of informal alliances at a local level ahead of a general election.

“What I’m saying is, we are going to have to, ahead of the next general election, find some way of building an accommodation, an alliance of sorts among voters at the constituency level,” he said.

Advertisement

“Conservative-Reform voters finding unity locally is going to be absolutely critical to determining whether or not we actually win that next general election.”

Goodwin dismissed the long-term impact of Restore Britain, however, arguing that its vote would eventually be “squeezed”.

Matthew Goodwin giving a thumbs up
Matthew Goodwin (Alamy)

There is evidence to suggest that an explicit pact between Reform and either Restore Britain or the Conservatives could hurt the former’s electoral chances. Tryl said that in both cases “a pact would actually lower Reform’s likely voter pool”, as a pact with Restore would deter Conservative 2024 voters, while a pact with the Tories would deter 2024 Reform voters. 

Like Goodwin, one senior party figure told PoliticsHome that they were convinced that Restore Britain “won’t be a question that needs answering”, predicting that Rupert Lowe’s party would soon collapse.

But the same source did not agree with Goodwin’s argument that Reform should build “an alliance of sorts” among voters at a local level ahead of the general election.

Advertisement

While they acknowledged that a hung Parliament may necessitate the need for conversations with other parties on the right, they dismissed the idea of a pre-election alliance. If they told their local branch that the party was doing a local deal with the Tories ahead of an election, they said, “half of them would walk out”.

Speaking to PoliticsHome on the condition of anonymity, a Reform councillor from the South East admitted that “on a local level, unofficially, pacts would have to be made”. They said it would be “very tough, because we don’t want to lose the idea of us being different”.

They also acknowledged the differences between the left and right bloc on this issue, pointing to Green-voting friends who would be willing to vote tactically for the Liberal Democrats. But referring to Reform voters, the councillor observed: “We are a lot more stubborn and won’t change [our] vote.”

A Reform member attending the conference voiced support for Restore Britain while speaking to PoliticsHome and said they would be open to a deal with the party. They said they would not be open to such an alliance with the Tories, however, as they had “stabbed Boris Johnson in the back”.

Advertisement

In a More in Common focus group recently, one voter voiced concern that Farage’s party had let in Tory defectors: “I’m not so sure that he now stands for what his party originally stood for… Rupert Lowe’s party that he’s bringing in is actually what Reform were when they first started.”

Speaking to PoliticsHome at an event on Friday, pollster John Curtice predicted that Reform would be engaged in an “existential fight until spring 2028”, but at that point the party would “have to work out where they are at, and whether or not they need to do a deal, and whether or not they can”.

Noting the difficulties around agreeing where the parties would stand down, Curtice warned: “The route to hell is paved with electoral pacts.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How To Tell The Difference Between Vanity And A More Serious Mental Health Issue

Published

on

Worrying about how big your nose or stomach is, for example, can be a sign of clinical body dysmorphia when it affects three things, according to Abrishami: functioning, freedom of thought and emotional health.

With trends like “looksmaxxing” and the ongoing rise in GLP-1s, there’s no wonder appearance is a growing concern for many people these days. Companies, celebrities and even your loved ones may place more focus on how they look, whether it’s their weight, makeup or style.

Looking “nice” isn’t necessarily a bad thing – it’s fun, it can be smart (helping you stick to the dress code for a job interview) and can even make you feel happier (we love “dopamine dressing”).

But if you’re taking endless selfies (with filters) and obsessing over every angle of your face and body, at what point is your attention to your looks actually a sign of a mental health concern?

According to experts, there is some reason to worry or at least to be mindful.

Advertisement

“[Those trends] open the door for competition and obsession because there’s always another tweak to chase or something to optimise,” said Golee Abrishami, a psychologist who specialises in eating and body image issues and serves as the vice president of clinical care at Octave.

“None of these trends on their own can necessarily cause a disorder, but they create more openings for everyday insecurities to turn into something bigger.”

Worrying about how big your nose or stomach is, for example, can be a sign of clinical body dysmorphia when it affects three things, according to Abrishami: functioning, freedom of thought and emotional health.

Maria Korneeva via Getty Images

Worrying about how big your nose or stomach is, for example, can be a sign of clinical body dysmorphia when it affects three things, according to Abrishami: functioning, freedom of thought and emotional health.

Yes, beauty and ‘wellness’ trends can mess with mental health

As mentioned, many current trends have us overly focused on our bodies in an insidious way. Social media and algorithms only exacerbate the problem.

Advertisement

“This leads us to believe that everyone is engaging in these behaviours, and if you aren’t, you will somehow be ‘less than,’” said Dr. Kaitlin Slaven, a psychiatrist with Eating Recovery Center. She points to studies that suggest the more we compare ourselves, the worse our body image becomes.

“Sadly, what these trends are doing is essentially hijacking our normal, human insecurities and weaponising them,” explained Dani Castro, a lead therapist and supervisor at Equip Health who specialises in eating disorders, OCD, body image, anxiety and depression. “The problem is that these trends suggest people’s bodies are projects to be optimised or shrunk.”

Add AI, and there’s no telling what’s actually real and realistic.

“When the standards we compare ourselves to are literally unattainable because they aren’t real, we set ourselves up for failure by striving for something that doesn’t exist,” she added.

Advertisement

Certain influencers aren’t helping, either. Abrishami discussed how they’re “normalising things that used to not be normal,” such as spending thousands of dollars on cosmetic procedures.

Some people turn to other technological advancements such as ChatGPT for style advice, which can also lead to further problems.

“Chatbots are designed to keep conversations going, so it can be really easy to get in prolonged conversations that help you obsess over your looks and insecurities,” Abrishami said.

This hyperfixation becomes culturally acceptable and “normal,” Castro continued, which creates an environment in which mental health concerns – such as body dysmorphia, generalised anxiety disorder and disordered eating – flourish.

Advertisement

At what point do appearance concerns signal body dysmorphia?

Worrying about how big your nose or stomach is, for example, can be a sign of clinical body dysmorphia when it affects three things, according to Abrishami: functioning, freedom of thought and emotional health.

“If focusing on how you look starts pulling time and energy away from other parts of your life, like relationships, work, school or just being present, that’s something worth paying attention to,” she said.

“If your mood swings depend on how you look that day, whether or not you worked out or what the scale says, those are signs the relationship with your appearance has become something different than just self-care.”

Advertisement

Similarly, Castro said it becomes a problem “when it turns into an obsession that consumes your daily thoughts.” She listed signs such as spending hours in front of the mirror, fixating on a perceived flaw or canceling plans because you can’t cover it up.

“When focus on looks takes up so much time that it interferes with other important aspects of your life, it may be time to seek help,” Slaven agreed.

“Body dysmorphia is characterised by preoccupation with flaws that are not observable to others, engagement in checking behaviors (mirror-checking, reassurance-seeking from others or excessive grooming) and clinically excessive distress or impairment.”

What therapists advise

Advertisement

The first step here may sound counterintuitive: avoid judging and shaming yourself.

“Shame will just feed that cycle,” Abrishami explained. “Name it in a neutral way, such as saying, ‘I think about this more than I want to.’”

Castro suggested aiming for body neutrality, or accepting your body rather than judging it. “You don’t have to love how you look every day, but you do need to stop treating your body like an object on display,” she said.

She encouraged setting a timer for mirror-checking, unfollowing toxic social media accounts, talking to a professional and spending time doing things you care about that don’t concern your body.

Advertisement

“Valuing experiences, hobbies or relationships and focusing more attention on those things than on the way the body looks is one of the most helpful ways to battle negative body image or body fixation,” she said.

Slaven added that finding a mental health professional or dietitian who specialises in disordered eating “can be really helpful.” She recommended reassessing your social media use as well (is this ever a bad idea?).

At what point do appearance concerns signal an anxiety disorder?

Your worries could be clinical anxiety if the behaviour – like putting on makeup before going to the gym – “stops being a choice and starts feeling like a shield,” according to Castro.

Advertisement

Abrishami agreed, saying, “Wanting to look good is different from believing certain things will be bad if you don’t.”

She encouraged looking out for “rules,” like “I have to do this routine, or the day is ruined.”

Don’t forget about the excessive preoccupation piece, either.

“Spending hours a day thinking about how you look, getting disproportionately upset if you don’t have time to do your full getting-ready routine … can signal an anxiety disorder may be present,” Slaven said.

Advertisement

“If these worries keep you up at night, make it hard for you to engage socially or cause physical symptoms, then you may be experiencing more than just ‘everyday worries.’”

To be clear, worrying about how you look or trying to change your appearance doesn’t always mean you have a mental health condition.

Lourdes Balduque via Getty Images

To be clear, worrying about how you look or trying to change your appearance doesn’t always mean you have a mental health condition.

What therapists advise

Can’t step out of the door without a full beauty routine? Challenge that. You can start small.

“Go to the corner store or the gym with one less product on, sit with the initial spike of anxiety and let your brain recognise that nothing catastrophic is happening,” Castro encouraged. “Exposure to the things that make us feel anxious is typically one of the most effective ways to cope with and improve anxiety.”

Advertisement

If that feels unmanageable or makes you feel panicky, a therapist can help.

“This can feel too big or scary by yourself, so don’t muscle through it alone,” Abrishami advised. “In fact, muscling through it can worsen your anxiety.”

At what point are your appearance concerns general insecurity or non-clinical anxiety?

To be clear, worrying about how you look or trying to change your appearance doesn’t always mean you have a mental health condition. Comparison is something that most (if not all) of us deal with, and according to Slaven, it’s “a part of human nature.” Sometimes, we can move on and maintain self-worth in those moments.

Advertisement

Whether it’s a diagnosable mental health condition, Castro said, comes down to flexibility and distress.

“General insecurity is uncomfortable, but it’s flexible: For example, you might feel self-conscious about an outfit, but you still go to the party and enjoy yourself,” she explained.

“A diagnosable disorder takes away that choice; it hijacks your thoughts for hours a day, dictates your schedule and leaves you feeling trapped by your own rules.”

With that said, make no mistake: Your “symptoms” not meeting the specific criteria for a diagnosable disorder doesn’t mean they aren’t serious and deserving of help or that they couldn’t get worse.

Advertisement

What therapists advise

Castro recommended practicing self-compassion, cultivating a healthy environment and not waiting until your problems worsen to see an evidence-based provider. She finds that the latter, especially, is “the best way to regain control over your life.”

Abrishami summed it up like this: “If all of your self-care routines are focused on what you look like on the outside instead of how you feel inside, then you need to make a change.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House | The Health Bill must protect patients who depend on specialised services

Published

on

The Health Bill must protect patients who depend on specialised services
The Health Bill must protect patients who depend on specialised services


5 min read

The Health Bill returning to Parliament this week is far more than an organisational restructuring.

Advertisement

The decisions Parliament makes about specialised commissioning could affect people across England living with rare, complex, and lifelong conditions. I believe the Bill currently lacks the statutory safeguards needed to protect national consistency, accountability, and patient safety.

In my role as the Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Spinal Cord Injury and representing the Golden Jubilee Regional Spinal Cord Injuries Centre, one of the United Kingdom’s 11 specialist spinal cord injury centres, within my constituency I know firsthand the incredibly positive impact that such specialist services have when someone is facing a long-term condition. When someone sustains a spinal cord injury, their life changes considerably. But with the support of relentless healthcare professionals across the country, people with a spinal cord injury are able to lead a fulfilled and dignified life.

Around 4,700 people sustain a spinal cord injury each year, contributing to a total population of over 105,000 people living with spinal cord injury across the UK. In England there are eight highly specialist spinal cord injury centres, providing essential acute care and rehabilitation support. Whilst there is no doubt of the dedication of the healthcare professionals working in spinal cord injury, the Officers of the APPG and I held an inquiry last year that exposed the challenges this system faces.

Advertisement

Our report included recommendations that sought to stabilise the system, build resilient infrastructure, and deliver long-term transformation through a National Spinal Cord Injury Strategy. I was shocked to discover the level of regional variation and the absence of meaningful national oversight and accountability.

Spinal cord injury centres serve population catchments that extended beyond local Integrated Care Board boundaries, and even NHS regional boundaries. An internal NHS England Service Review of Spinal Cord Injury Services in 2016 even noted that commissioning decisions ‘vary substantially’ with variations leading to ‘inequalities in access and care’, finding ‘it is evident that this national service would be better co-ordinated by a national commissioner who has the authority either to commission centrally or to direct and monitor delegated regional commissioners to commission according to an overall strategy’.

But this isn’t only about spinal cord injury services. The same fundamental question arises across specialised healthcare: how do we reform commissioning without fragmenting the services relied upon by people with complex and lifelong conditions?

Around 170 specialised services provide care that cannot simply be replicated in every hospital. They depend on specialist teams, concentrated expertise and coordinated pathways that often cross ICB and regional boundaries. What Parliament decides in this Bill therefore matters far beyond the spinal cord injury community. That is why I have tabled a package of amendments to the Health Bill.

Advertisement

Rather than seeking to block reform to our health system, the amendments I have tabled aim to ensure that, where commissioning is transferred from national responsibility, specialist services remain safe, equitable, nationally coordinated, and accountable. Together these amendments establish four critical safeguards:

1 – Before the transfer of a service from national commissioning, an assessment of the likely impact on patient safety, outcomes, equality of access, and geographical variation must be published.

2 – If a service is then transferred, a framework must be maintained that covers service standards, care pathways, workforce requirements, outcome data, and coordination between specialist, community, and neighbourhood services.

3 – Following any transfer of responsibility, the performance of Integrated Care Boards in relation to specialised services must be annually assessed including on patient outcomes, access, workforce capacity, service sustainability, and geographical variation, and the findings must be published.

Advertisement

4 – A report must be laid before Parliament on the commissioning and performance of specialised services commissioned by Integrated Care Boards so that Parliamentarians across both Houses can effectively scrutinise the functioning of these services.

These amendments have the support of the Spinal Injuries Association, the Neurological Alliance, and other organisations. Between them, the organisations within these alliances represent people across a very broad range of neurological, rare, and complex conditions. Their support underlines that this is not a concern confined to spinal cord injury, but one shared across the specialised healthcare sector. I encourage fellow Parliamentarians to support these amendments.

There is also an opportunity in this Bill to improve what happens after someone receives a life-changing diagnosis. I have tabled a further amendment to the Single Patient Record provisions so that, with a patient’s consent, they can be referred to an approved voluntary or charitable organisation providing condition-specific support. For people adjusting to a complex diagnosis or a catastrophic injury, early access to specialist advice, peer support, and practical help can make an enormous difference. The Single Patient Record should not simply improve how information moves through the NHS; it should help connect patients to the support they need.

Reorganisation of our health system is a costly business. My motivation is to ensure that the Health Bill is fit for the future, alongside an NHS that is. While I still have concerns that transferring the commissioning of services, like spinal cord injury, is not appropriate, I am committed to ensuring that if transfer occurs it is safe and accountable. Specialist services are a difficult area, and Sir David Carter found that previous decentralisation led to the devolution of services that were unsuitable, financially volatile and high risk. Parliament should learn from that experience rather than risk repeating it.

Advertisement

I thank the minister for her engagement with me on this, and it is encouraging that the Government has recently recognised that spinal cord injury services will continue to require national-level coordination between the centres, and continue to be defined as specialised services, subject to national service specifications, commissioning policies, and national standards. But administrative assurances are not the same as statutory safeguards. Protections for patients who depend on specialised services must be clear, durable, and enshrined in legislation, ensuring national consistency, accountability, and service sustainability.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

My Widow’s Fire: I Was Horny After My Husband Died

Published

on

The author and her husband Tom. "This was a month before he died," she writes.

When my husband Tom had a massive stroke and died, I expected to feel devastated. I expected to feel a rollercoaster of emotions – joy for the 12 years we had together, despair over never seeing him again, full-body laughter remembering how he took up knife sharpening as a hobby after his stroke, seemingly unending tears over my imperfections as a caregiver.

I expected some friends to drift away while others would surprise me with their unwavering presence, showing up with lasagnes and placing late-night phone calls when I needed them most. I was warned quickly about the maddening paperwork.

But nobody mentioned the fire I would feel in my loins less than two months later.

I remember exactly when it happened. I’d spent most of the day curled up on the couch with my phone, scrolling through photos of Tom and me together and bawling my eyes out. And then, with tears still running down my cheeks, I felt a pulsing, urgent need that seemed wildly inappropriate given the circumstances. And yet there it was: desire, burning through me with an intensity that left me breathless.

Advertisement

That feeling stayed with me for nearly a year. For a year, I was horny. All. The. Time.

It was as though my body had suddenly remembered it was alive while my heart was still learning how to beat on its own. The contrast was jarring. I’d spend hours sobbing while sorting through his things and then take a break to masturbate.

I didn’t want anyone in particular; I wanted anyone at all. I wanted the raw physical intimacy of sex, the primal sensation of skin on skin, and the feel of someone’s body heat melding with mine as we crawled inside each other.

My first reaction was shame – profound, all-consuming shame. How could my body do this to me? How could I feel sexual desire when the love of my life was gone? I felt like I was betraying him somehow, as if by acknowledging my own sexuality, I was erasing our love, our history. As if my body had forgotten what my heart couldn’t.

Advertisement

I didn’t have a framework for understanding what was happening. Intense horniness was not mentioned in any of the support group meetings I went to.

Luckily, my dog walker connected me with a widow around my age, who told me about the widow groups on Facebook. I joined several and learned that what I was experiencing had a name: widow’s fire. I also discovered it’s normal – completely, utterly normal – and it can affect people of any gender or sexual orientation.

Some people feel it within months, like I did. Others feel it a year later. Others never feel it.

The author and her husband Tom. "This was a month before he died," she writes.

Courtesy of Elizabeth Kleinfeld

The author and her husband Tom. “This was a month before he died,” she writes.

What’s even more shocking than the fact that it’s totally normal for widows to be insanely horny is the silence around it. When I finally worked up the courage to mention it to my grief counsellor, her matter-of-fact response stunned me: “Oh yes, that’s quite common. Many widows experience that.”

Advertisement

Common? Many? Then how come the Facebook widows were the only ones talking about it?

There are biological reasons for this surge. Grief and sexual desire activate similar areas of the brain. Both involve intense emotion and physical sensation. Both represent a form of connection and release. There’s a biological imperative for connection when we’ve lost our primary attachment figure. The body seeks oxytocin, the pleasure chemical, to soothe the pain of loss.

There’s something almost primeval about it in the face of death, the body rebels by emphasising life. Sex is, after all, life-affirming in the most fundamental way.

Since experiencing this, I’ve learned that widow’s fire ignites indiscriminately across intimate histories – women who had passionate, frequent sex with their partners can find themselves feeling nothing, while those whose relationships had been physically dormant for years suddenly experience an overwhelming awakening of desire that seems to come from nowhere.

Advertisement

And it has nothing to do with age. I was 52 when I experienced widow’s fire, but I’ve spoken to widows who were in their 70s when they encountered it.

For some widows, this heightened desire manifests as a specific craving for physical touch not necessarily sexual, but the fundamental human need for skin contact that previously was satisfied daily through casual touches, hugs, or simply sharing a bed. For others, it’s more explicitly sexual – a physiological response to trauma, to stress, to the body’s need for the endorphin release that sexual activity provides.

When you’ve been part of a couple for years or decades, sexuality may have been expressed exclusively through that relationship. Suddenly, that avenue is gone, but the fundamental human need remains.

The author and her husband Tom in 2017.

Courtesy of Elizabeth Kleinfeld

The author and her husband Tom in 2017.

My Journey Through The Fire

Advertisement

Two months after my husband’s death, I knew I had to do something to quell my craving, but I wasn’t ready to leave my house. Tom and I had always shared a sexually adventurous relationship, exploring various aspects of BDSM together throughout our marriage. I went to a kink website we had browsed and sometimes chatted with others about shared interests. Returning to it felt both comforting and strange, like revisiting a favourite restaurant but dining alone for the first time.

Eventually, I began exchanging messages with a man who lived three states away, someone who understood my need for both connection and distance. Our long-distance BDSM relationship became my first step into this new territory of grief and desire. The structured nature of it – the defined boundaries, the explicit communication, the psychological elements – provided a framework when everything else in my life felt structureless. The physical distance felt safe, allowing me to explore desire without the complication of actual physical intimacy before I was ready.

We talked on the phone and texted for several months. When I flew to meet him, I found him to be arrogant and unappealing in real life, and I ended things. However, my urge for touch continued, so I joined a dating app and began chatting with another man. Our weekend together still makes me smile, three days with someone who was absolutely, categorically wrong for me in every way except one: the chemistry was undeniable.

Our politics, temperaments, and what we wanted from life were diametrically opposed, but those 72 hours of passionate connection were profoundly healing. There was no pretense of a future, and no attempt to replace what I had lost. It was simply an affirmation that I was still capable of feeling, of desire, of pleasure – even in the midst of grief.

Advertisement

A few months later, when I felt open to something closer to an actual relationship, I knew my desperate lust might cloud my judgment about potential partners. A friend suggested I find a “friend with benefits” – someone I genuinely liked and respected, but with whom I shared no romantic future. This was unfamiliar territory for me, but again, the kink website delivered.

The arrangement was straightforward: companionship, physical connection, and no expectations beyond the present moment. It was exactly what I needed at that stage of my grief: a way to address my physical needs while giving myself the emotional space to navigate dating with greater clarity and presence.

I was selective about who I confided in during this period. My two closest friends knew everything, from my late-night loneliness to the details of my arrangements. They listened without judgment, occasionally checking in to ask if these encounters were helping or hurting my healing process. Two other friends, widows themselves, knew the broad strokes but not the specifics; I sensed they were uncomfortable with the idea of me seeking physical connection so soon after Tom’s death. Nobody else knew anything, but people regularly commented on my glow.

"I didn't have a roadmap for navigating this aspect of grief," the author writes.

Courtesy of Elizabeth Kleinfeld

“I didn’t have a roadmap for navigating this aspect of grief,” the author writes.

Navigating Without A Map

Advertisement

I didn’t have a roadmap for navigating this aspect of grief. Nobody had warned me, so I had to find my own way through research, through tentative conversations with other widows, through honest discussions with my therapist, and eventually, through my own experiences.

What I learned was that there’s no right way to handle widow’s fire. Some choose to channel that energy into physical activity or creative pursuits. Others explore self-pleasure as a way of reconnecting with their bodies. Some eventually pursue new relationships when they’re ready.

For all of us, though, it’s important to remember that grief isn’t linear. It can coexist with other feelings, even seemingly contradictory ones like desire. The heart is complex enough to hold both reverence for what’s lost and acknowledgment of continuing needs.

Grief and healing aren’t mutually exclusive. This was perhaps the most profound realisation in my journey that I could simultaneously miss my husband desperately and acknowledge my body’s continuing needs. But this understanding didn’t come easily.

Advertisement

For the first year after Tom died, I felt like I was cheating on him whenever I experienced desire, even though before his death, he had explicitly told me he wanted me to find love again and understood that would include physical intimacy. Despite his blessing, I felt ashamed, even slutty, for wanting to touch so soon, as if my physical longing dishonoured his memory.

The breakthrough came from an unexpected source. My friend with benefits, observing my internal conflict, simply said, “Of course, your body wants sex.” Those six words shifted something fundamental in my understanding. He wasn’t widowed, but somehow he grasped what I couldn’t yet see: my body’s needs weren’t in conflict with my grief, but existed alongside it, neither diminishing nor replacing my loss. My physical desires weren’t betraying my love for Tom; they were affirming that I was still alive, still human, still whole even while broken.

There’s something revolutionary about recognising that widowhood doesn’t require denying one’s sexuality, that honouring a lost love doesn’t mean living as if you too have died.

Each of my encounters taught me something different about the healing process. The long-distance relationship showed me I could be vulnerable again. My wild weekend reminded me that spontaneity and joy were still possible, and that passion was still available to me. The friend with benefits taught me that physical connection could exist without replacing the emotional bond I had with my husband.

Advertisement
The author with her dog Luna in 2025.

Courtesy of Elizabeth Kleinfeld

The author with her dog Luna in 2025.

Eventually, widow’s fire subsides, or at least becomes manageable. For me, it lasted about a year before settling into something less urgent and less all-consuming.

What remained was a recognition that I was still fully human with all the complex needs and desires that entail. I learned that healing includes reclaiming all parts of oneself, even those that seem at odds with grief. I discovered that there’s no contradiction in honouring what was lost while also honouring what remains: a body and spirit that continue to seek connection, pleasure, and life.

I write this now, years later, wishing someone had told me all of this then, wishing I hadn’t felt so alone, so confused, so ashamed of a perfectly natural response.

If you’re a new widow experiencing this, I want you to know you’re not alone. You’re not betraying your spouse. You’re not grieving “wrong.” Your body is responding to loss in one of the many complex ways humans respond to trauma and change.

Advertisement

And if you’re supporting someone through grief, understand that bereavement encompasses more than tears. It includes navigating identity, physicality, and yes, sexuality, in a new context.

Healing doesn’t mean forgetting or replacing. It means integrating the loss into a life that continues, a life that still contains joy, desire and connection.

Elizabeth Kleinfeld is a writer, professor, and end-of-life doula living in Denver, Colorado. She is writing a memoir about being her husband’s caregiver for the year before he died. Her work has been nominated for the Pushcart Prize, and she was named a best emerging writer by Masters Review. She blogs about grief and disability at https://elizabethkleinfeld.substack.com/.

This piece was previously published on HuffPost and is being shared again now as part of HuffPost Personal’s “Best Of” series.

Advertisement

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What’s New On Netflix In September 2026? 9 New Shows And Films To Stream

Published

on

What's New On Netflix In September 2026? 9 New Shows And Films To Stream

With the autumn months approaching, we’re reaching that point of the year when some of our favourite shows, from Strictly Come Dancing and the Great British Bake Off to Drag Race UK, all start returning to our screens.

But September has some promising new and returning shows coming to Netflix, too.

After two years away, one of the biggest hits in recent years, The Gentlemen, is finally back for new episodes, while Ryan Murphy’s always-controversial Monster anthology series is taking a very different approach with its latest offering.

Then, there’s a new binge-worthy reality show to sink your teeth into, as well as a feature-length outing for one of the 2020s’ biggest TV comedies and, Netflix being Netflix, plenty of true crime to get streaming, too.

Advertisement

Here are just nine of the shows and films we’ll be streaming in the coming weeks…

Raygun: Breaking Badly (Streaming now)

Tell me more: Australian break dancer Rachael Gunn, better known to her followers as Raygun, accidentally became one of the 2020s’ most talked-about Olympians when she made her debut in Paris and went viral for all the wrong reasons.

Advertisement

Looking back two years on, this documentary gives Rachael the chance to tell the story of her rise to infamy in her own words, not just looking back at the lighter moments of her meme-worthy performance, but the more serious allegations, misinformation and outright abuse that followed it.

Netflix says: “Nobody, least of all Rachael Gunn, expected to be an Olympian. But as Raygun’s performance at the 2024 Paris Olympics went viral overnight, so did an avalanche of memes, misinformation and conspiracy theories questioning how she ever got there.”

The Gentlemen (Streaming now)

Advertisement

Tell me more: Netflix might have kept fans waiting two years for the next instalment in Guy Ritchie’s unhinged crime drama, but if the early reviews are anything to go by, it was worth the wait.

Once again, Theo James and Kaya Scodelario are leading the star-studded cast that includes returning faces like Vinnie Jones, Ray Winstone and Giancarlo Esposito, as well as some intriguing new additions including Love Island host Maya Jama and Downton Abbey’s Hugh Bonneville.

Excitingly, much of the action this time around takes place in Italy, as Eddie and Susan’s work takes them even deeper into the criminal underworld.

Netflix says: “It’s been one year since Eddie and Susie joined forces to work together in Bobby’s criminal empire overseas. As they drive to expand their enterprise, the decisions Bobby is making seem to be increasingly unsound.

Advertisement

“Now Eddie and Susie must decide whether to take action or risk losing it all, but unfettered ambition never ends well…”

Instadocs: The Decoy Plane (Streaming now)

Tell me more: Alright, remember a couple of weeks ago when Donald Trump ducked out of Air Force One in a catering truck to quietly board another plane, leaving behind the secret service, the plane’s crew and his own staff.

Advertisement

Well, this one-off documentary is looking into exactly what that was all about, and what actually went on…

Netflix says: “This July, while flying back from a NATO summit in Turkey, President Trump slipped off Air Force One in a catering truck and secretly boarded a different aircraft – leaving traveling reporters to fly on, unaware the president was no longer with them.

“Instadocs: The Decoy Plane unpacks the incident through firsthand accounts from members of the press corps who were aboard Air Force One as well as a former Secret Service agent and a former Air Force One crew member.”

Why Did I Get Married Again? (9 September)

Advertisement

Tell me more: The latest offering to come from Tyler Perry’s Netflix deal is a new instalment in his Why Did I Get Married? series.

Almost 20 years on from the original film, the gang are back together to prepare for one of the couple’s nuptials, which naturally begins to raise questions among them about relationships, marriage and how far an apple ever falls from the tree.

Joining Tyler in the film are returning faces like Jill Scott and Richard T Jones (though, sadly, pop superstar Janet Jackson does not appear due to a scheduling conflict).

Advertisement

Netflix says: “In Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married Again?, the couples reunite in celebration as Marcus and Angela’s daughter prepares to tie the knot.

“After being apart for quite some time, they learn quickly that as much as things change, they stay the same. Realising their children have grown up to be so much like them, they must reflect on the examples they’ve set and ask themselves that age-old question, why did they get married… again?”

Call My Agent! The Movie (10 September)

Advertisement

Tell me more: Originally a hit among viewers in France, the French-language comedy Call My Agent! became an international hit when its final season premiered at a time when much of the world was in lockdown.

As the title suggests, the satirical showbiz series centres around a hapless pair of agents and their struggles to satisfy their many famous clients, with this new movie instalment picking up six years later.

This time around, the action takes us out of the agents’ offices and into the wider world, sending up the entire movie industry as Andréa takes a big leap into directing – which proves every bit as chaotic as fans might expect.

Netflix says: “Five years after the agency closed its doors, Andréa is finally ready to direct her first feature film.

Advertisement

“When her lead actor quits and she falls out with her producer, she joins forces with Noémie – now a reality TV producer – believing she can easily manipulate her. But as she faces a complete recasting, on-set disasters, and a legal battle threatening the custody of her daughter, everything begins to unravel.

“One by one, the former ASK colleagues converge on this high-tension film set. Each arrives with their own role, their ego, and a fair share of old grudges – little do they know what this reunion truly has in store for them.”

Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story (17 September)

Advertisement

Tell me more: OK, we’re going to be honest. Between the grisly and graphic violence and so many controversies casting such a long shadow over everything, Ryan Murphy’s Monster has never really been a project we’ve had much interest in sitting through – but with its latest iteration, he’s finally piqued our interest.

Much has already been made of the fact that season four centres around the “first female monster”, with Ella Beatty taking on the role of the acquitted axe murder suspect Lizzie Borden, but it’s also the first to take place so far in the past – with its period setting being one of the biggest draws.

Then, of course, there’s the cast, with Ella being joined by Rebecca Hall, Vicky Krieps and, in his return to Monster, Charlie Hunnam – and Sarah Paulson also set to appear as Aileen Wuornos in one of the show’s most intriguing casting decisions to date.

Netflix says: Lizzie Borden took an axe… The first female monster from Ryan Murphy’s famed anthology series.”

Advertisement

Wonka’s The Golden Ticket (23 September)

Tell me more: One for fans of Squid Game: The Challenge, Netflix’s new competition series brings Willy Wonka’s factory to life, with contestants being put through a series of bizarre games and challenges befitting of the iconic chocolatier.

Although the show looks to be as much of a visual feast as you’d imagine, Wonka’s The Golden Ticket has already left something of a sour taste for some, over its use of an AI-generated rendering of the late Gene Wilder’s voice to “host” the games.

Advertisement

Netflix says: Twelve lucky Golden Ticket winners, each with a partner of their choosing, will step through the gates of Wonka’s Chocolate Factory and into a world of pure imagination, delicious mischief, and unexpected challenges.

“Once inside, contestants must navigate a series of Wonka’s games, tests, and temptations designed to challenge them physically, mentally, and morally.

“In this high-stakes social experiment, players will journey through the factory’s wondrous and unpredictable landscape, adapting, strategizing, and withstanding the unknown while proving they have the instincts, resilience, and character to thrive in chaos. In the end, only one contestant will have what it takes to earn Wonka’s life-changing prize.”

Lego One Piece (29 September)

Advertisement

Tell me more: Just so we’ve got this clear… this is a Lego reimagining of a Netflix live-action series, inspired by the anime, which itself was adapted from the manga.

Convoluted though it may sound, anyone who has been gripped by the Straw Hats’ swashbuckling adventures will probably get a kick out of this two-part miniseries, which has rendered the story you already know in Lego form.

Netflix says: “Get ready to set sail! In this two-part animated Lego special, Usopp, the Straw Hats’ most reliably unreliable narrator, regales Chopper with the crew’s escapades across the East Blue and into the Grand Line, prior to him joining them in Drum Island. Usopp only tells the tallest of tales, and this action packed special is no different!”

Advertisement

The Widower: ’Til Death Do Us Part (30 September)

Tell me more: Over the last few years, Netflix has become synonymous with its true crime offerings, and whether you find them gripping, weirdly intriguing, distasteful or a complete turn-off, the service is ending the month with another one.

In this new offering, The Widower: ’Til Death Do Us Part, a detective and investigative journalist team up to get to the bottom of a story involving a Las Vegas man who has been married six times, four of which ended in his wife dying in mysterious circumstances.

Advertisement

Netflix says: In this documentary, a journalist and a detective uncover the truth about a killer whose charm masked a trail of failed marriages and suspicious deaths.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025