Image credit: Ministry of Defence

Illy Andrews, Vice President – Defence International
| Amentum

Advertisement

What matters are the industrial capacities, skills, supply chains and trusted partnerships that give Britain the freedom to act independently

The UK Strategic Defence Review stressed the need to maintain sovereign capability, citing nuclear warheads, munitions factories and submarine production as critical areas. The focus on sovereign capability for national prosperity is essential, but manufacturing is only part of the national prosperity and resilience needed to deter the threats we face.

Advertisement

The Good Growth Foundation recently made an important contribution to this debate, arguing that defence investment must strengthen British businesses, support SMEs and deliver visible benefits for communities across the UK. But the reality of sovereignty is more complex than where a company is headquartered. The question is whether Britain retains the skills, industrial capacity, supply chain resilience and operational freedom required to act independently. That means buying British where it delivers the best capability, value and resilience. It also means working with trusted allies, at government and industry level, to access the best technology and innovation available.

Amentum’s UK scientists, technicians, programme managers and engineers are an essential part of the knowledge and skills base that underpins the defence enterprise, working at our offices and laboratories or on client sites critical to the UK’s nuclear deterrent. Our heritage in the UK defence sector stretches back more than 70 years, including involvement in every British nuclear submarine that has gone to sea and a key role in supporting procurement of facilities and equipment essential to the UK’s sovereign capability in all domains. To sustain our skilled workforce, we invest heavily in training graduates and apprentices. Our links with academia keep us at the forefront of technology.

Ukraine has shown that an adaptive, ingenious, homegrowndefence industry is critical to repelling an aggressor. The Strait of Hormuz has shown how conflict can disrupt long-distance supply chains. Sovereignty therefore depends not only on what Britain can build, but also on whether it can sustain, move and adapt capability under pressure.

Advertisement

That is why Amentum has formed the Torus Defence Supply Chain alliance with Accenture, GXO and Maersk: bringing together logistics scale, military expertise and defence-grade digital insights to strengthen supply chain resilience and sovereign operational capability.

In today’s interconnected world, sovereignty requires making the most of collaboration with allies. Amentum’s work on the UK’s hypersonics programme is reliant on two-way transfer of technology and intellectual property, requiring advanced systems engineering, propulsion integration, modelling and simulation, test design and operational understanding. It combines a UK delivery base with access to allied experience, reducing risk while keeping the programme focused on British sovereign requirements.

The UK participates in more US-led, military-related technology projects than any other country, while also seeking to do more with Nato allies. That should not be viewed as a compromise of sovereignty, it is one of its enablers.

As government develops its Defence Investment Plan, industry will look for a framework that aligns security with growth. With 6,000 people in the UK and a commitment to create 3,000 new highly skilled jobs by 2030, Amentum sees how defence investment can strengthen readiness while creating opportunity across the country.

Advertisement

Ultimately, sovereignty should be measured not simply by what is built in Britain, but by whether Britain has the skills, industrial capacity, resilient supply chains and trusted partnerships necessary to act independently when required. If we get that balance right, defence investment can strengthen our national security and prosperity while ensuring that we can overcome emerging challenges in a radically changing world.

Meet the Amentum team at Farnborough International Airshow 2026 from 20th – 24th July, Hall 3, Stand 3931.

Source link

Source link

Source link

Source link

Source link

President Donald Trump couldn’t avoid public wrath while attending Sunday’s World Cup final between Spain and Argentina.

As singer Jennifer Hudson wrapped a stirring rendition of the US national anthem, the Jumbotron at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium jumped to Trump, immediately inciting a blast of boos from the 82,500 other fans in attendance.

Verified by measurements shared with the presidential press pool, ambient crowd noise at the stadium clocked in around 78 decibels while jeers brought it to 84.

The US president was watching from a VIP suite along with his friend, FIFA President Gianni Infantino, first lady Melania Trump, and diplomatic rivals Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada and Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum.

Advertisement

Eva Marie Uzcategui – FIFA via Getty Images

Trump, who was on hand to present the winning team with the World Cup trophy, did not pick a favourite ahead of the game but did remark that it’d be difficult for Spain to reckon with Argentine star Lionel Messi’s talents.

Though the 2026 World Cup has been a historic success, drawing a record-breaking 6.6 million fans across 16 stadiums throughout North America’s three largest nations, the impact of the US president’s politics could not be avoided.

Scandal emerged over decisions to deny a respected referee from Somalia entry, as well as the US sharply curtailing visas for the Iranian delegation and forcing the team to keep their home base in Tijuana, Mexico.

Nevertheless, Trump celebrated the World Cup as an American success during a reception for FIFA at his New York City Trump Tower on Friday.

Advertisement

“It turned out we were a soccer country, and I think it’s going to remain,” he said of the once soccer-sceptical US. “This has really brought the world together.”

Source link

Source link

Los Angeles leaders are spending billions to make the 2028 Olympics a story of climate and environmental policy progress, reports Alex Nieves.

Transit and community groups want to know whether the investment will be part of the region’s Olympic legacy or just a flash in the pan.

The question of just how enduring their efforts will be was a throughline Tuesday and Wednesday at the Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator’s Road to 2028 summit — an event focused on leveraging the Olympic Games to accelerate clean energy and transportation development in the state’s most populous region.

The overall vibe of the conference was an optimistic one, as Los Angeles County and dozens of cities are hustling to secure hundreds of buses, plant trees and clean waterways before millions of people descend on the region in two years for the Games. But some attendees were already wondering what comes after the two-week mega event is over.

“When we look to the future, if once the games leave and we have not left communities better than the way we found them, then we have all lost,” said Cynthia Mitchell-Heard, CEO of the Los Angeles Urban League, speaking on a panel of grant recipients who’ve received funding from the LA Olympics organizing committee for environmental projects. (The Urban League received $100,000 to create a workforce development program for people affected by last year’s Altadena fire.)

Catherine Baltazar, associate director of advocacy and organizing at Climate Resolve, argued that throwing dollars at infrastructure projects won’t guarantee long-term progress in communities that have historically lacked resources and disproportionately borne the brunt of climate change.

“Investment should not end when the Games end,” Baltazar said. “We know that these communities will continue long after the Games, and so for me, that’s the legacy that I want.”

The focus on the post-2028 future comes in part because of what was seen as a successful test run during this summer’s World Cup. The region hosted eight matches at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, avoiding any major snafus while seeing a significant spike in public transit use.

While the Olympics will be far larger than the World Cup, the region has structural advantages over many past Olympic host cities, including enough existing venues to house every sporting event. Much of the preparation now is centered on buying and leasing roughly 1,700 buses — including 500 electric school buses — to shuttle fans to and from venues that will be transit-only.

Transit advocates argue that those investments, including recent expansions of Los Angeles’ light-rail system, don’t solve for structural budget deficits that could threaten service cuts — as bus and rail operators have already warned about farther north in the Bay Area.

Los Angeles’ legislative delegation has failed the last two years to secure a boost in the state budget for systems like LA Metro, which faces a $2.3 billion deficit through 2030. Metrolink, a commuter rail line that serves six counties across Southern California, has indefinitely extended a 20 percent reduction in weekday service amid a $30 million deficit.

Matt Petersen, CEO of the Cleantech Incubator, told POLITICO the budget challenge has only intensified under a Trump administration hostile toward clean transportation.

“Local governments are struggling, states are struggling on how to put the resources where they’re needed,” he said. “I think the bottom line is: Without the feds, it’s super hard.”

But he said he still believes that Los Angeles is “well on the way to being ready” for the Games and to leave a lasting benefit for the community.

“That’s really what we’re here to do,” he said. “Ten years after the Games, what will we have seen manifest because of this moment?”

Source link

CHICAGO — The United States’ third-largest city felt confident passing on this year’s World Cup in part because the city’s sports loyalty was well-scripted. The Bears owned Sundays. The Cubs and White Sox divided baseball fans. And the Bulls still carry the glow of the Jordan dynasty.

But a whole new generation of sports teams is betting Chicago’s appetite for sports is bigger than its traditional loyalties — and that fans are ready for something different.

The WNBA’s Chicago Sky is preparing to host the league’s All-Star weekend July 23-26. The Chicago Stars are trying to build a women’s soccer franchise in a city with deep youth participation and a growing appetite for the sport. And the Chicago Fire are planning a new privately financed stadium in the South Loop and are investing heavily in youth development and facilities.

The timing is notable.

The city’s newest teams are making their pitch at the same moment two of Chicago’s oldest franchises are asking for help building new homes.

The McCaskey family continues to pursue public assistance for a new Bears stadium, whether in Illinois or Indiana. White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf has sought public support for a proposed South Loop ballpark. Those requests have triggered a familiar debate: whether taxpayers should help finance stadium projects for billion-dollar sports franchises while governments struggle with schools, transit and other basic services.

The newer teams are offering a different message. Chicago Fire owner Joe Mansueto, another Chicago billionaire, privately funded the team’s $750 million stadium, though the Chicago City Council earlier this week approved a $425 million tax subsidy to fund the surrounding infrastructure. Their pitch is not built around nostalgia but around investing in communities.

At a sports and business forum at the Obama Presidential Center this week, Fire Chief Marketing Officer Dan Moriarty described a shift in how soccer is being consumed in Chicago. The sport’s audience is younger, more diverse and increasingly global, he said, with fans who already follow international clubs now looking for a local connection. He pointed to a simple sign of change: at Chicago farmers markets, soccer jerseys are increasingly common — even if many of them still carry the names of European clubs.

The challenge, he said, is turning those fans into supporters of Chicago teams.

“Soccer has this lifestyle aspect,” former U.S. women’s national team goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher said during the discussion. “It brings people together.”

That may be soccer’s biggest advantage in Chicago. The city is already a global crossroads, with neighborhoods shaped by generations of immigrants and communities that have long embraced the sport. The Fire are betting that global stars can accelerate that connection. The club recently signed Polish striker Robert Lewandowski, one of the world’s most accomplished players, as part of a broader effort to raise the team’s profile.

Women’s sports are riding a similar wave.

“Women’s sports generally, and particularly soccer, has seen an evolution in this country,” said Laura Ricketts, who is a bridge to the old and new in sports. She’s a co-owner of the Chicago Cubs, an investor in the WNBA’s Chicago Sky and executive director of the Chicago Stars women’s soccer team.

“What we’re now seeing [is] an explosion, especially in the NWSL,” she said of the National Women’s Soccer League. “We’re growing, and the best way [to see it is] our fan base is growing.”

She compares women’s soccer today to the NBA or Major League Baseball of the early 1980s. “There’s just so much opportunity,” said Ricketts. Women’s soccer, she said, has benefited from decades of investment in youth leagues and college programs. That foundation is now translating into a professional audience.

The growth is not just about attendance. It is about loyalty. Women’s sports fans, Ricketts said, tend to be younger and highly engaged, with a strong connection to the brands and communities supporting the teams.
With World Cup interest, “We’re just seeing the tip of the iceberg for soccer in this country.”

She said there’s been similar investment into basketball and she hopes Chicago sees the benefits of that as it hosts the WNBA All-Star weekend, marking three decades of the league.

“The momentum continues right here in Chicago,” Sky co-owner Nadia Rawlinson said, describing the event as a celebration of how far women’s basketball has come — and how much further it can go.

None of this means the Bears, Cubs, White Sox or Bulls are losing their place in Chicago’s sports hierarchy. But newer teams are making a case for a place alongside them.

Source link

Stories of fans left outside stadiums, duped by “ghost tickets” on resale platforms, were everywhere at this year’s World Cup. But advocates are hopeful the near-endless stream of negative headlines and angry supporters will spur long-sought-after laws to outlaw the practice of speculative ticket selling, when resellers put tickets they don’t yet have on the open market.

At the state level, it would seem they’re right.

Illinois, North Carolina and Washington, D.C. have all passed legislation banning speculative ticket sales since the beginning of the World Cup. Connecticut, Oregon and Vermont have also enacted ghost ticket bans this year. And Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey announced her intention to file a bill prohibiting ghost tickets — among other consumer-friendly initiatives — on Thursday.

“It’s definitely raising eyebrows in the state of politicians and legislators to really ban ghost ticketing, speculative ticketing,” said Scott Friedman, podcast host and co-founder of the Ticket Talk Network. “When you have it happen at this scale, that not just affects the United States, it’s a global tournament for heaven’s sake. Absolutely, change is coming.”

“You see dozens of these bills percolating around the country,” said John Breyault, vice president of public policy, telecommunications and fraud at the National Consumers League. “Most of which have some kind of ban on speculative tickets.”

There’s action at the federal level, too. Though advocacy groups aren’t exactly aligned on a path forward in Congress. Breyault and the NCL have been active in promoting the TICKET Act, which passed the House in April and moved through the Senate Commerce Committee in June.

Proponents say the bill would ban speculative ticket sales and safeguard consumers against fraudulent ticket websites.

“In this environment, where Republicans and Democrats can’t agree that the sky is blue on some days, that’s a rare occurrence,” Breyault said.

But Stephen Parker, the executive director of the National Independent Venue Association, said the “you could drive a Mack Truck” through the TICKET Act’s ghost ticketing provisions. Music groups, too, have panned the bill, arguing it would still allow speculative ticket sales by permitting sellers to advertise ticket procurement services for tickets they do not yet possess.

For now, Parker said, the most encouraging action is happening in the states.

“This is happening across the country, and ultimately, what we are seeing is state legislators from both parties saying enough is enough. If Congress isn’t going to do something, we are, and we couldn’t be more grateful for their work.”

Source link