Politics
How did ‘Mr Rules’ let the Mandelson scandal happen?
Now that the Peter Mandelson scandal has erupted back on to Britain’s front pages, can we once and for all dispense with the notion that Keir Starmer is a ‘forensic’ political operator who follows rules and procedure to the letter?
Starmer’s former UK ambassador to Washington was arrested yesterday on suspicion of misconduct in public office, allegedly for passing on financially sensitive information to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Mandelson himself denies any wrongdoing, and no one is suggesting that Starmer should have known about the precise contents of any private emails with Epstein. But shouldn’t our ex-prosecutor PM have asked a few more probing questions of Mandy before offering him one of the most coveted jobs in the British government?
What the prime minister surely knew when he appointed him last year was that Mandelson continued to have a relationship with Epstein, after his conviction for soliciting sex from a minor. It was public knowledge – indeed, published in the Financial Times – that Mandelson stayed in Epstein’s Manhattan apartment in 2009, during the financier’s first spell in prison. Starmer must also have known the Epstein Files were a bomb waiting to go off, with US president Donald Trump having campaigned for their release during the 2024 election.
And if the PM was unaware of any of that publicly available information, then he must at least have known that Mandelson was a magnet for sleaze scandals, having been sacked twice by Tony Blair and accused of dodgy dealings with a Russian oligarch when he was posted to Brussels as Britain’s European commissioner. Plus, there is the small fact that the man was literally nicknamed ‘the prince of darkness’…
Even if ‘forensic’ Keir somehow missed all of this himself, such things are supposed to be caught when the Foreign Office carries out due-diligence checks on appointees. Except, according to the i newspaper, vetting that would normally take months was carried out in weeks – fast-tracked under pressure from No10. Security-service insiders suggest that a ‘full and proper’ background check would have turned up some of the allegations that were later made public in the Epstein Files. But of course, that process was expedited to put ‘Petey’ in a plum job.
None of this is to suggest that we should overly fetishise bureaucratic hiring rules or vetting procedures. Who the PM should appoint as our man in Washington is a question of political judgement above all else. But isn’t ‘Mr Rules’ precisely what Keir Starmer promised he would be in Downing Street? Indeed, that cringe-inducing moniker was given to him by one of his own shadow ministers in 2020, for his apparently strict observance of the coronavirus regulations, in contrast with his cake-scoffing, Estrella-swigging opponent, Boris Johnson. Starmer was similarly hailed by pliant media for his ‘detailed and forensic’ questions at PMQs, for his ‘clinical’ and ruthless ‘cross-examinations’. Yes, the lawyerly Labour leader might be a bit dull and lacking ‘the vision thing’, Starmer’s fanboys might concede, but at least he would cross every procedural t, and dot every legal i. He would bring the eye for detail of the barrister, the ‘fearsome’, forensic acuity of the prosecutor to the job of prime minister.
The fact that Starmer can’t even get that right isn’t just a sign of his incompetence (although he certainly brings that in spades). It’s that those lofty appeals to ‘rules’ and ‘procedure’ have always been pure wibble. Rules are made to be broken, as the saying goes, and it is politics that dictates whether a rule breach is deemed a trifling non-event or a scandal that leads heads to roll.
We can see this most clearly in the civil service – the wing of the state that claims, quite implausibly, to stand above the political fray, bound only by hallowed rules and codes of conduct. Some of the recent scandals coming out of the Cabinet Office’s comically misnamed ‘ethics department’ would be considered too on the nose if they were written as satire.
The Sunday Times reported last weekend that Ellen Atkinson, the government’s head of propriety and ethics, was actually promoted to the job ‘in breach of its own ethics rules’ (the appointment was not advertised to any external candidates). Atkinson replaced Darren Tierney who, in 2022, is alleged to have ordered staff to break into a safe holding a copy of an investigation into alleged bullying by Dame Antonia Romeo, who Starmer appointed last week as his new cabinet secretary. The document said she had a ‘case to answer’. Tierney had the investigation and other files destroyed. Naturally, he says he acted within the rules – a claim dismissed as ‘extraordinary’ by a former civil servant speaking to The Times.
Before her appointment, Romeo was also accused of misusing taxpayer money for expenses and using her position to promote woke ideology. She reportedly told one underling to attend a ‘gender-nonconforming book club’ as part of a performance review. Which brings us back to Starmer who, just as when hiring Mandelson, is reported to have ‘forced through’ the process to give the cabinet secretary role to Romeo, his preferred candidate.
The picture that emerges here is one of fast-tracked appointments for me, ‘ethics’ and ‘procedure’ for thee. More often than not, rules, regulations and process matter only in as much as they advance or impede the interests of the Blob and its allies.
In the end, the Mandelson affair matters, not because Keir Starmer may have followed the ‘wrong’ processes in hiring his ambassador, but because he lacked the political nous to see why some sort of scandal involving the prince of darkness was inevitable. It is yet one more failing among many showing why he is so unsuited for high political office.
Fraser Myers is deputy editor at spiked and host of the spiked podcast. Follow him on X: @FraserMyers.
Israel has used the F-35 jet throughout the Gaza genocide, as well as in airstrikes against Iran, Lebanon and Yemen. And now Israel’s ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, has confirmed the number of flight hours Israeli pilots have on the Lockheed Martin stealth fighter:
is greater than that of all the pilots of the other foreign countries that were partners in developing the aircraft.
These comments are completely at odds with the UK government’s insistence that Israel is a “minor customer” of the global F-35 jet programme.
Valuable feedback for Lockheed Martin
In an interview Leiter said:
The feedback from our pilots reaches Lockheed Martin. When I visited there a few weeks ago, their CEO told me that Israel’s information and developments ‘are worth many billions to my company.’
Leiter was speaking with Israel Hayom daily, and the Times of Israel reported it on 16 February.
The UK makes 15% of the F-35 jet. The US is the lead partner and the UK is the only Tier 1 partner. The other partners to the programme are Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands and Norway.
Israel has 48 F-35I jets, with 27 more jets on order. On 20 January, the Canary shared news from Lakenheath Alliance for Peace that three new F-35Is left the UK air base, RAF Mildenhall, bound for Israel.
Israel is also involved in the production of the F-35 programme. In February 2026 Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) celebrated the delivery of its 350th fighter jet wings to Lockheed Martin for production of the F-35 fighter jet.
UK government comments
The UK government has been provided with extensive evidence of Israel’s use of the F-35Is by Al-Haq and GLAN throughout their legal case in the UK High Court.
Despite an Israeli ambassador and the CEO of Lockheed Martin confirming Israel’s central role in the F-35 programme – both as a user and developer of the F-35 jet – the UK government has repeatedly attempted to downplay Israel’s use of the jet and role in the programme.
In a letter to Dame Meg Hillier MP on 19 February, minister for the Middle East Hamish Falconer MP wrote:
The UK Government has stopped direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel. The only exception is for the global programme, of which Israel is a minor customer [emphasis added].
In a letter to Sarah Champion MP, chair of the International Development Committee, on 1 September 2025, former foreign secretary David Lammy wrote:
We are unaware of any possible breaches of IHL having been linked to the limited evidence of F-35 use in Gaza and it is worth remembering that, where UK-produced F-35 parts go to the global spares pool, Israel operate a very small proportion of over 1,000 F-35s in the global fleet [emphasis added].
Use of F-35s in Gaza
As early as November 2023 it was reported that Israel was making heavy use of its modified F-35I Adirs. Former IDF chief of staff Lt Gen Herzi Halevi confirmed F-35Is were providing close air support to ground troops 200 metres away in Gaza. He stated:
We never did anything like this. With very heavy munitions, a very good connection between what the [ground] force needs and what the plane knows to give.
In December 2023, US officials confirmed they were rushing spare parts and additional capabilities “at breakneck speed” for the F-35 to Israel from October 2023. Officials stated Israel’s F-35Is have performed “absolutely outstanding” in Gaza, and that the programme could “learn a lot” from seeing F-35s used in combat.
The Israeli Air Force has modified its F-35Is, in partnership with Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon’s F-35 programme, to operate in so-called “beast mode”, which allows them to carry four 2,000lb bombs. The IAF said that its aircraft are the “only F-35 to conduct strikes with this design.”
Danish NGO Danwatch revealed that in July 2024 an F-35 dropped three 2,000 lb bombs in an attack on a so-called “safe zone” on Al-Mawasi in Khan Younis, killing 90 Palestinians.
A spokesperson for Campaign Against Arms Trade said:
Israel is plainly not a minor customer for the F-35 programme, if it has flown more hours than any other partner country in the programme, and if the data it has generated though its genocide in Gaza is worth billions to Lockheed Martin. No other country has used the F-35 jet at near the rate that Israel has, let alone in two years of active combat. This cannot be overstated.
The comments made by Lockheed Martin and US and Israel officials over the last two and half years go beyond illustrating passive greed. Israel’s attack was immediately identified as an unprecedented opportunity by the F-35 programme to collaborate with the IDF and take the data generated by Palestinian suffering and death to test, develop, market and sell the jet.
We call on the UK government to correct the record, and admit that Israel is the key customer of the F-35 programme. We call on the government to immediately halt all transfers of F-35 parts to Israel.
Featured image via YouTube / Military Aviation Channel
In 2025 the disgraced, but still in place, US Homeland Security (DHS) boss Kristi Noem’s claimed on far-right Fox News that a victim of her and her boss Donald Trump’s deportation war on brown people was a cannibal. Not satisfied with that, she then claimed the man tried to eat himself as he was flown out of the US on an ‘ICE’ plane:
[This is the] kind of deranged individuals that are on our streets in America, that we’re trying to target and get out of our country. …You know, what bothered me the most is that this U.S. Marshal just said it like it was normal. He said he was literally eating his own arms. That is what he did. He called himself a cannibal and ate other people and ate himself that day.
It was a naked ploy to demonise the victims of the fascist regime’s purge – and has now been exposed as a complete fabrication. Or in plainer language, a total lie. No fewer than three federal law enforcement officials – including one from Noem’s own DHS – have confirmed that the whole thing was fiction. One, on condition of anonymity, said:
That is completely made up. That never happened.
Homeland Security boss Noem already faces widespread calls for her to resign or be sacked – and formally impeached – for smearing ICE’s murder victims Nicole Good and Alex Pretti as “domestic terrorists“. She has persisted in these smears despite abundant video evidence showing them to be lies as well.
Ardent Zionist Noem has clearly been taking lessons from the genocidal colony she loves in making up atrocity propaganda to justify evil. And, just like Israel, her lies have been quickly and completely debunked.
Featured image via the Canary
On 25 February 2026, Jewish anti-Zionist groups and other anti-genocide humanitarians will hold a demonstration outside Westminster Magistrates Court. The protest will be in support of three defendants charged with using the word ‘intifada‘. ‘Intifada’ is Arabic for ‘shaking off chains’, commonly translated in English as ‘uprising’.
Despite its ordinary meaning, the UK Israel lobby in and out of government is determined to present the word as an antisemitic call for the ‘killing of all Jews’ instead of a call for Palestinian freedom from occupation and self-determination. The ‘First Intifada’ was a campaign of non-violent resistance, but the deliberate misuse of the word is part of the Starmer regime’s ‘lawfare’ war against free speech on Israel’s crimes and the rights of Palestinian people.
Holocaust survivor descendant Mark Etkind said:
Where will this attack on free speech end? Will people next be arrested for using words like ‘democracy’ or ‘freedom’? With some countries already banning the slogan ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!’, the answer to that question is, probably: ‘yes’.
Claims by Keir Starmer and other politicians that such slogans are antisemitic have no basis in fact. They are just cynical inventions to justify repression of a pro-Palestine movement which has always had numerous Jewish participants.
Starmer’s other anti-democratic persecutions of anti-genocide activists and writers have mostly failed so far. For the sake of justice, this one must too – but given the reputation of magistrates as presiding over ‘kangaroo courts’, it may not.
The protest starts from 9.30am.
Featured image via the Canary
Quakers in Britain and the United States of America have nominated Concordis International for the Nobel Peace Prize. The nomination recognises two decades of community-led peacebuilding.
UK-based international NGO Concordis works in some of the world’s most fragile conflict zones. It aims to help people tackle the root causes of violence.
From Chad to South Sudan, it supports communities to rebuild, farm safely, and become resilient to famine, climate change, and war.
In their nomination, the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) and Quaker Peace & Social Witness (QPSW) praised Concordis’ humility, respect, and consistent promotion of local partners.
The nominating letter said:
Concordis International’s commitment to peace is not new, brief, or transactional… Unlike the adversarial justice of the western world, they seek the healing justice for all parties, typical in a relational world view…
Their humility, respect, enthusiasm, and consistent promotion of their local partners over themselves is an international model for this millennium.
Peter Marsden, chief executive of Concordis, said:
We are truly grateful for the trust in us that AFSC and QPSW have shown.
More importantly, we’re grateful for their commitment to highlighting and applauding the unsung work of awesome local peacebuilders. These are the bold souls who work for peace where conflict is fought and felt.
Concordis works to ensure that everyone impacted by a conflict has a voice. This includes people neglected due to age, gender, ethnicity, people who take up arms, and those who do not, as well as governments and civil society.
Oliver Robertson, head of witness and worship for Quakers in Britain, added:
We are delighted to nominate Concordis International for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Their work reminds us that true, lasting peace comes from the courageous, patient work of local people who heal wounds, build understanding, and bridge divides.
AFSC general secretary Joyce Ajlouny said:
We are honored to nominate Concordis International for the Nobel Peace Prize.
A century of experience has shown us, time and again, that peace does not come at the barrel of a gun.
And while diplomacy between world leaders is important, it is the tireless efforts of everyday people working to resolve conflicts and address injustices that truly builds lasting peace.
As former Nobel winners (laureates), AFSC and QPSW can make a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize every year.
Their 1947 prize recognised 300 years of Quaker opposition to war. And in particular the work done by AFSC and what is now QPSW during and after the two world wars to feed starving children and help Europe rebuild itself.
Featured image via the Canary
While Bad Al was visiting Ukraine when he was handed “an official EU folder for my work to get the UK back in” from EU ambassador Katarina Mathernova. What on earth are those trainers…
Whether you loved it or you hated it, Emerald Fennell’s sexually-charged reimagining of Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights – featuring a brooding Jacob Elordi – still has us all talking over a week after its cinematic release. While the original 1847 novel didn’t feature any sex scenes, Fennell’s film is far more ‘Heathcliff, it’s me, it’s Cathy, I’m horny.’
But for all the sneaking out of bedroom windows, romping in carriages, grinding in the moors, finger sucking and… puppy play that Fennell portrays in her take of Wuthering Heights, how much of this raunchery was actually going on during the period in which the original novel was set?
When you think of sexy periods of time in history, we tend to think of the promiscuity of the Ancient Romans or even the more recent free love movement of the 1970s – not the late Georgian era. So before we all start wishing that we could jump in a time machine to 1770 and find our own Heathcliff to romp about the moors with, we asked leading UK historians what sex and relationships back then were actually like.
Social Class Dictated Your Sex Life
Right from the first opening scene, Fennell’s version of Wuthering Heights features public hand jobs at the gallows and crowds snogging during a frenzied public hanging in an impoverished town centre – and you’ll be surprised to know the film was actually onto something historically accurate.
As the London Museum explains, public executions were more like a fair and a party atmosphere would be in the air as thousands of people gathered to watch someone’s final moments. Gruesome, we know – however, apparently it wouldn’t be enough to turn the Georgians off.
You see, according to Dr. Ruth Larsen, Senior Lecturer in History at the University of Derby, pre-marital sex was really common among poorer classes during the time in which Wuthering Heights was set (1770 to around 1801). “Poorer people tended to marry older and engage in sexual activity prior to that, especially those living in urban areas,” she tells HuffPost UK.
So: thousands of people, likely from poorer classes, gathering en masse in an urban area with drinking and partying going on? You do the math – it would appear that this is a big old tick for Fennell’s uninhibited Wuthering Heights adaptation.
But what about those lucky enough to be born into aristocracy? Unfortunately you wouldn’t be ‘getting lucky’ as often as your less well-off counterparts.
“For the wealthier classes, it was very unusual for women to have sexual relations before wedlock,” Dr. Larsen explains. For people like Cathy, pre-marital sex would be off the cards as “the usual form of courting would have been through assemblies, formal gathering and family acquaintances.”
The sense of familial obligation, to uphold the positive reputation of the family, was felt by many, not just the richest in society – and the film yet again gets this right with Edgar Linton, whom Cathy marries, despite her love for Heathcliff in order to improve her family’s social standing.
And her choice wouldn’t have been uncommon in the late Georgian era either. As Dr. Larsen adds: “For most young women, marriages were an opportunity to find their place in society, to become mistress of the house and, if they were landed, of the estate. To decide to take a different path would have been seen by most people as unwise.”
The Logistical Nightmare Of Affairs In Georgian Britain
Of course, the sauciness in Fennell’s Wuthering Heights really ramps up when Heathcliff and Cathy give up yearning and instead start a steamy affair (cue the famous sex scene montage).
However, as easy as the duo make it look, having an affair in the late 18th century was far from plain-sailing.
“The scenes where Heathcliff crawls in through Cathy’s window are very much representative of the literary tropes we love today, but this might have been difficult to pull off in historical reality,” Lauren Good, Senior Content Producer from HistoryExtra, tells HuffPost UK.
If you were rich enough, you’d be lucky enough to have a separate bedroom to that of your spouse (as Margot Robbie’s iteration of Cathy thoroughly enjoys), however your bedroom would be adjoined – which, as Good points out, “isn’t ideal in allowing for a quick exit from your illicit lover!”
And if you did manage to get some time alone with your ‘bit on the side’, trying to then have sex wasn’t straightforward thanks to the fashion of the era.
“Women’s dress of the era wouldn’t have been so easy to get into,” Nichi Hodgson, author of the Curious History of Dating: From Jane Austen to Tinder explains.
“Women typically wore a chemise, corset, under petticoat, hoop skirt or crinoline, over petticoat and long sleeved gown – plus gloves.” Good luck trying to remove all of that while your husband snores next door.
At least Cathy wouldn’t have had to try and get her knickers off, as Hodgson points out that drawers did not come into fashion until the 1870s: “If a hooped skirt tipped to one side, you may have got an eyeful!”
In fairness to Fennell, we don’t see a nude Cathy in any of the film as Heathcliff navigates her many, many layers of opulent clothing during the daytime sex scenes in the montage – so once again, we have another historical accuracy win!
The Surprising Sadomasochism Of The Late 18th Century
Excuse our phrasing but buckle up – this might be the most surprising historical accuracy of the entire film.
Arguably the most shocking portrayals of sex in Fennell’s film come in the shape of sadomasochistic relationships, namely two servants enjoying off screen flagellation in the stables and Isabella Linton’s submissive role to Heathcliff’s dominant. And it turns out, in the words of Hodgson, “bondage and kink were alive and well in the 18th century!”
“We often assume that the stricter societal expectations placed upon those who lived centuries before us translated into their intimate lives, but that wasn’t always the case,” Good explains.
“We might dismiss this as shock factor in Wuthering Heights but flagellation, as Hilary Mitchell told us at HistoryExtra, ‘played a prominent role in English sex work from about 1700 onwards’.”
But before we get ahead of ourselves, it’s worth noting that BSDM-inspired activities were most likely services that men paid for, or engaged in with women in their service (female maids were often treated as household sex workers) as Hodgson explains.
And as for Isabella panting on a lead, you can forget about it happening in real life she adds – “not because those sort of dynamics didn’t exist but because no middle class gentleman and woman would ever be that brazen in front of a visitor like Nelly Dean in the film.”
While the release of Wuthering Heights has us yearning for moody Georgian era romance, it’s surprising how much of it is rooted in reality. If we do hop in that time machine, we’ll just have to remember to pack easier to remove clothing.
According to Labour, the Greens never stood a chance in the Gorton & Denton by-election. What’s strange is Labour are now saying voters are switching from the Greens to Labour, suggesting they did actually abandon the incumbent Labour Party at some point, but have now switched back?
We’re unsure what Labour have done to convince people they can win besides shouting ‘ONLY WE CAN WIN‘, but apparently that is happening.
Unless, of course, this is all staged:
this feels so fucking staged lmao https://t.co/x0BEfcquwo
— Nat ✨ FREE 🇵🇸 (@loopzoooop) February 24, 2026
“So fucking staged”
Let’s do a detailed breakdown of the above video, shall we?
What seems to be happening is Labour candidate Angeliki Stogia is speaking with a resident on their doorstep. The camera person is standing behind some bushes for some reason, with their focus trained on the resident’s window. In said window there’s a flyer for the Green Party, and the video ends with the resident replacing it with a Labour flyer.
The problem is not everything adds up:
- For whatever reason, the audio isn’t aligned with the footage. You can tell this because Stogia walks away from the house while the resident is still speaking.
- The fact that the camera person is stood behind a bush suggests they were recording the scene without the resident’s knowledge.
- The camera person is focused on the window while Stogia was still speaking to the resident, suggesting they somehow knew what was going to happen with the flyer.
How did they know that the man would immediately replace the Green Party flyer with the Labour once? Unclear. But the simplest explanation is ‘it was staged – they faked that shit‘.
Others had similar suspicions:
I, for one, believe that this is completely authentic, and not at all staged.
Yes, this newly-converted Labour supporter doesn’t appear on camera, but that’s probably just down to shyness, and not because he’s a Labour councillor pretending to be a member of the public. https://t.co/6IcO6iJf4S
— Plutôt la Barbie (@plutotlabarbie) February 23, 2026
Labour’s entire campaign in Gorton and Denton is not “look at what great things we have done”, but instead “don’t vote for the scary Greens”.
— Robespierre (YouTube) 📢 (@MaxFRobespierre) February 24, 2026
If Labour have faked it, it’s another sign Labour are once again copying a Reform MP. As Emily Apple wrote for the Canary in 2019 on then-Conservative Lee Anderson:
Lee Anderson is running in the Tory/Labour marginal seat of Ashfield, in the East Midlands. Labour narrowly won the seat in 2017 by just over 400 votes. But Anderson’s dirty tactics should provide yet another reason why no one in Ashfield should vote for him.
She added:
Michael Crick from Mail Plus caught Anderson redhanded “setting up the apparently spontaneous doorstop encounter beforehand”. The reason Crick could do this? Anderson had seemingly forgotten he was wearing a radio mic!
Absolute scenes as @MichaelLCrick catches a candidate in the act of setting up a “friendly voter” on the doorstep. (Video credit @MailPlus_) pic.twitter.com/azdtVk20eA
— Dino Sofos (@dinosofos) November 25, 2019
TLDW
For a full 4 hour breakdown of the 10 second clip, be sure to check back in tomorrow.
If you want a TLDW on that – yeah – we also think Labour staged it.
Featured image via The Canary
After Rupert Lowe’s splashy launch of Restore Britain, the ex-Reform MP claims to now have north of 80,000 members. Some Reform HQ insiders are twitchy about Lowe peeling off chunks of the grassroot voters. One source admits Lowe is “extremely well connected” and, with serious donor cash, could snatch low single digits in the polls.…
4 min read
It may not be a huge vote-winner, but a safer prison estate benefits society as a whole.
The realities of prisoner ill health are shocking. You are much more likely to die young in prison: the average age of death in custody is 56, compared to 81 in the general population. Prisoners also experience a wide range of serious long-term conditions, including higher rates of infectious disease, respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease than the wider public. Substance use is widespread, as is gambling. Poor mental health is common.
Some groups face distinct health risks. Women have particular needs, including higher rates of self-harm and gender-specific gaps in care, and there have been reports that babies have died in prison after their mothers gave birth without medical assistance. All people face health risks as they age, and older prisoners – defined as those aged 50 and above, reflecting evidence that health problems appear around ten years earlier in prison – are no exception. Young people in custody also have disproportionately high health needs, often rooted in childhood adversity and abuse.
Part of the explanation is that people in prison often face complex needs before entering custody, shaped by deep-rooted societal inequalities. Just as deprivation, disadvantage and trauma drive crime, they also take a heavy toll on public health. Prisons inherit poor health and face significant challenges from the outset.
Another reason for prisoner ill health lies within the estate itself. Life in prison is brutal, and deteriorating facilities – HMP Wandsworth being a prime example – with cramped and dirty cells, failing sewage systems and rodent infestations compound existing problems. Overcrowding and staff shortages, a matter of considerable political attention under this Labour government, make it even more difficult to manage prisoners’ health and safety.
Healthcare in custody depends on a functioning prison regime, yet services are poorly equipped to meet prisoners’ needs. Public spending cuts under austerity, falling standards, and fragmented, siloed services mean the system is not working as effectively as it could. Continuity of care is crucial, but evidence shows post-release healthcare is often poor, with many people losing contact with treatment once in the community, perpetuating poor health.
‘Why should I care?’, some might ask. Prisoners, whatever their background or crime, are often seen as worthy of only punitive treatment, and investing in improving their conditions may not be, on the face of it, a vote-winning topic.
First and foremost, healthcare is a human right – and that includes prisoners. Even if your view is that prison should be punitive, not rehabilitative, its purpose is to restrict the liberty of those convicted of crimes, not to harm their health or deprive them of necessary care. Prisoners deserve and are entitled to medical treatment, and ensuring they receive it is the right thing to do.
Second, aside from questions of human rights, investment in prisoners carries public health dividends, shaping outcomes long after release. As isolated as they are, prisons are not sealed off from society. People enter custody from the community and return to it when their sentence ends. The burden of our collective healthcare falls on us all, so a healthier prisoner population is in society’s interest.
It can also help reduce reoffending. As the Chief Medical Officer for England, Professor Chris Whitty, has highlighted, offending and reoffending after release are closely linked to health. Access to good health services can support engagement with rehabilitation, delivering positive social and economic benefits in the long run. Less offending means less demand for costly prison places, freeing up public resources for more effective use elsewhere.
Crime, poverty and health are inextricably linked, and breaking this cycle benefits not only prisoners but society as a whole, including the taxpayer. If the government is serious about improving the health of people in prison – and realising the wider benefits this entails – action is needed, including greater investment in the deteriorating prison estate, support for prevention measures to address illness as early as possible, and improved coordination and integration across health services.
It is time to consign the appalling state of health in prisons to history, where it belongs.
Jake Shepherd is a senior researcher at the Social Market Foundation
We cover Reform UK a lot here at the Canary, and little would surprise us at this point. Saying that, politicians openly calling for MPs to be shot is a step up from what we’ve seen before:
Grim
Natalie Fleet responded to the post as follows:
Posts like this are so common I don’t bat an eyelid.
But they remind me why my husband & kids *begged* me not to stand.
I felt huge responsibility; last lab gov helped me, I wanted to help others.
But…we should be able to fight for our areas w/o death threats as standard. https://t.co/rygygMqikY
— Natalie Fleet MP (@NatalieFleetMP) February 24, 2026
Regardless of political differences, Facebook dipshits shouldn’t be calling for MPs to be shot. We watched a man gun down Jo Cox on the street in 2016, and it would be grim to see a repeat of that. There is a real risk that could happen, though, with politicians themselves riling up voters like this.
One outlet phrased the incident like this:
Reform UK deputy leader reshared social media post calling for Labour MP to be shothttps://t.co/kfsRAauS1E
— Reform Party UK Exposed 🇬🇧 (@reformexposed) February 24, 2026
Let’s be real, though; if you share a post calling for someone to be shot, then you are calling for that person to be shot.
Councillor Simon Evans has now responded with the following:
If Evans is telling the truth, what he’s saying is: ‘I’m a fucking idiot who will just share things without reading them or checking that they’re true‘.
In other words, whether he’s telling the truth or not, he’s clearly incompetent.
The account Reform Party UK Exposed said the following:
Reform UK’s Deputy Leader in Lancashire Simon Evans… has made a “sorry, not sorry if I caused offence” apology for reposting a post on Facebook calling for Natalie Fleet MP to be shot.
It’s not good enough. He let comments be posted, he had it there for a full day. She is a grooming and rape survivor.
A sincere apology would be resigning.
They added:
This comment and this reply were still live this morning. He only took action when we posted.
His excuse is ‘I didn’t notice the text’.
Not good enough, this man is responsible for a £1.2bn Lancashire budget and he is claiming he didn’t notice what he was posting to Facebook.
Ridiculous.
Violence
This is all happening at the same time that a Reform MP talked up the possibility of a civil war, and Nigel Farage threatened to bring ICE-style policing to the UK.
A new footage has been released, and it looks like the ICE agent Jonathan Ross was the agitator and called her a bitch after he shot her.
Renee Nicole Good engaged calmly and told him “I’m not mad to you, dude.” pic.twitter.com/Ozhjnn7MPx
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) January 9, 2026
Reform really are a gruesome lot.
Featured image via X
Man charged after person found injured in Haddington property later died in hospital
Ford Motor Company (F) Stock Holds Steady Near $14 Amid EV Pivot, Strong 2026 Guidance Offsets Q4 Miss
Lockheed Martin CEO confirms Israeli F-35 data is worth billions to the company
-
Video5 days agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Politics3 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Sports1 day agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Business7 days agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Entertainment6 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Politics1 day agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Tech6 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Sports6 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Business2 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Crypto World12 hours agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Business2 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Entertainment6 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Business6 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Tech2 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat1 day ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
NewsBeat2 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics2 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
Crypto World6 days agoWLFI Crypto Surges Toward $0.12 as Whale Buys $2.75M Before Trump-Linked Forum
-
Tech1 hour agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting