A record number of groups are exploiting a gap in campaign finance law to flood this year’s primary elections with money — without disclosing their donors until long after the race is over.

More than $48 million has already been spent on House and Senate primaries this year by super PACs that did not have to reveal their donors before elections took place, according to a POLITICO analysis of data from the Federal Election Commission. That is more than double the total at this time in the 2024 cycle, and 10 times higher than in 2018.

The groups are taking advantage of the campaign finance calendar. A super PAC formed after the last pre-election FEC deadline can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money in the crucial final days of an election without disclosing its donors until afterward. The practice has been used for years, but never to the degree of this year’s midterms.

Roughly 1 in 10 dollars in outside spending that has flowed into primaries so far this year has been through these secretive groups.

In some cases, the pop-up super PAC spending has the characteristics of one political party meddling in another’s primary to help boost a candidate seen as more beatable in November, which is what happened in competitive races in Texas’ 35th District, Maine’s 2nd District and most recently New York’s 17th District. In other cases, groups sought to hide their connection to controversial sources, like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

“It’s certainly a very strategic effort to avoid providing transparency for voters,” said Saurav Ghosh, director of federal campaign finance reform at the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center. “So even if they’re acting within the letter of the law, they are ultimately undermining in spirit. Because disclosure requirements exist so that voters — when they’re deciding who to cast their ballot for — have the information about who has spent money backing these candidates.”

The path for secretive spending on primaries is relatively straightforward. New groups launch after a monthly or quarterly FEC deadline. They spend millions of dollars to support their preferred candidates, bombarding voters in the final days when they are most engaged with an election. And by the time they have to report their money, weeks after the end of the month or quarter, the election they were aiming to influence is already over.

The tactic is more common in primaries than general elections because outside groups have to file pre-general reports in mid-October, leaving only a relatively small window before the November election where they would be able to launch and spend without disclosing financial information.

The efforts to hide sources of funding have happened across the country this cycle and to support and oppose candidates of widely varying ideologies. More money has been spent in Democratic primaries than Republican ones so far.

Since the beginning of May, two super PACs widely suspected of being tied to Republicans — Lead Left and Real Change — have spent $4.3 million across Democratic primaries in five competitive House districts to boost progressive candidates that are seen as weaker in the general election. Neither group will have to reveal their donors until mid-July.

In Kentucky’s 4th District, where GOP Rep. Thomas Massie was seeking reelection after President Donald Trump endorsed his challenger Ed Gallrein, a newly created super PAC spent a whopping $6.7 million to attack Gallrein. The PAC shut itself down shortly after the primary, revealing only then that most of its funds came from a Texas-based firm. (The PAC is now facing an FEC complaint alleging it was a straw donor scheme.)

In Illinois’ March primaries, three newly created groups tied to AIPAC spent $16 million on House races. While news reports linked AIPAC to the groups throughout the primaries, it wasn’t revealed until afterward that United Democracy Project, AIPAC’s main super PAC, was the leading funder. That allowed AIPAC — which has become politically controversial in Democratic primaries — to attempt to influence the elections without officially declaring its involvement as ballots were being cast.

In the special primary election to replace the late Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) last year, a newly launched super PAC called Fight for Virginia’s Future backed Connolly’s former chief of staff, James Walkinshaw. After the election, which Walkinshaw won, it was revealed that the group’s funding was transferred from Connolly’s campaign account.

Not every newly launched super PAC is inherently secretive. In some cases, new groups are clear about their affiliations even if they don’t immediately report their donors to the FEC.

And there are other ways for super PACs to hide their sources of funding beyond taking advantage of the FEC’s timing. Many get transfers from 501(c)(4) nonprofits, which face far fewer disclosure requirements.

As the practice of pop-up super PACs has become more common, it’s also become more sophisticated.

In past cycles, new super PACs that hid their sources of funding were sometimes linked to existing interests through the little information they do have to share when they are formed or spend money: their vendors, address and treasurer name and contact info. But many groups have developed workarounds and now use unknown treasurers or new vendors that also popped up around the same time as the PACs themselves.

In a handful of Democratic primaries in competitive districts this year, pop-up super PACs that have been linked to Republicans through PO boxes and website metadata have run ads that closely mimic the logos and official materials of Democratic campaigns in the race.

In one case last month, the Republican-linked Lead Left PAC spent nearly $1 million backing Democrat Maureen Galindo over Johnny Garcia in Texas’ 35th District. Galindo had been widely condemned by her own party for calls to turn a local ICE detention center into a “prison for American Zionists.”

The spending on her behalf led to the moderate Blue Dog PAC leading a rescue mission for Garcia: It spent more than $1 million to boost the former Bexar County sheriff’s deputy.

Neither Real Change or Lead Left responded to requests for comment sent to the emails listed on FEC filings. Other groups, including Fight for Virginia’s Future, Kentucky 4th PAC and UDP also didn’t respond to requests for comment. Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC tied to House GOP leadership that is widely speculated to be behind some of the pop-up PACs, did not respond to a request for comment.

Phil Gardner, a senior adviser to the Blue Dog PAC, said the Lead Left ads were “literally trying to impersonate other campaigns.”

Garcia — who ultimately won his race by more than 20 points — said in an interview that news reports linking Lead Left to Republicans helped show voters the importance of the race.

“It showed just how scared they were of our campaign, that they were willing to invest in a candidate that was clearly antisemitic that they knew they would defeat very easily in the general election,” Garcia said.

A similar pop-up PAC also spent heavily for progressive Matt Dunlap over state Sen. Joe Baldacci in Maine’s battleground 2nd District, which Trump won in 2024 and is open this cycle because moderate Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) opted not to seek reelection.

Ian Russell, a national Democratic strategist who is working on Baldacci’s race, said the GOP-linked ads could trick voters who don’t realize they aren’t coming from Dunlap’s campaign.

“They’re literally running a positive ad for Matt Dunlap,” Russell said. “They’re using his campaign logo. They’re using B-roll off of his YouTube page.”

That race is still uncalled as it goes to a ranked-choice count this week.

In recent years, some Democratic and Republican lawmakers have pushed for tightening campaign finance law, saying sources of funding should be more readily disclosed. But there have not been meaningful advances in campaign finance legislation.

Just last week, Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) introduced a bill that would require super PACs to disclose every large donation they receive in the final 20 days of an election — which would make it harder for pop-up PACs to hide their sources of funding.

“All this dark spending money is just skyrocketing,” Crow said in an interview. “Super PACs, corporate donations, pop-up PACs. It’s out of control and it’s getting worse every cycle.”

Source link

INGLEWOOD, Calif. — Those in charge of SoFi Stadium have two days to clean out SoFi Stadium between the United States’ thumping of Paraguay on Friday and a face-off on Monday between Iran and New Zealand. They can count on the L.A. County Department of Health to help with the grossest part.

County health officials are already removing wastewater from the stadium before, during and after every match played at SoFi Stadium, to test for the presence of various viruses. The county health department — which is responsible for the well-being of ten million residents — developed its syndromic-surveillance capacity during the Covid pandemic, but is now deploying it for the first time it at a sports facility.

You can read more in a fascinating report from POLITICO health-care reporters from coast to coast, led by my Sacramento-based colleague Rachel Bluth, about how public-health authorities have prepared for a World Cup unfolding amid an Ebola outbreak, rising measles cases in the United States, and continued fears of hantavirus.

Click here for the whole story.

Source link

The British state’s war on UK rights and justice to protect Israel continues. Jewish protesters are demonstrating outside an event to sell stolen Palestinian land to colonisers today, 14 June 2026. But the Met Police is already arresting peaceful protesters — and appears to be targeting Jewish protesters for violent repression:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by @jewish_antizionist_action

The protesters have been loud, but entirely peaceful — Met Police are out of line:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by @jewish_antizionist_action

The event had already changed location trying to avoid the protests, after the first venue withdrew:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by PYM Britain (@pymbritain)

The Jewish Anti-Zionist Action group said:

Our protest was Immediately met with violent and disproportionate policing and counter demonstrations.

The outrageous sale of Palestinian land and property, including in illegal settlements in the West Bank, is not welcome in our Synagogues, or anywhere else.

We stand proud alongside over 100 other organisations, public figures and politicians, to demand that the Government take urgent action aganist this outrageous event, that very likely breaches UK and International law.

We know that during this same event in New York City only last month, land sales in Kfar Eldad, Karnei Shomron and other Israeli settlements in the occupied territories were advertised.

We will not stand by whilst this criminal activity now takes place in London.

Advertisement

The use of a synagogue for these events, as an attempt to shield themselves from rightful criticism and protest, is inexcusable, and as anti-zionist Jews we will defend our Synagogues from this exploitation.

We reject the use of our faith and culture as a justification for occupation, war crimes and the ongoing genocide.

We refuse the idea that our safety lies in the seizure of Palestinian land and the destruction of Palestinian life.

As British Jews we will resist any attempt to recruit us to the Israeli settler colonial project.

Advertisement

We affirm our rightful place here in the UK, standing in solidarity with our neighbours, and fighting for Palestinian and collective liberation.

END ALL LAND SALES NOW, FREE PALESTINE

The situation continues to develop. Solidarity with the people of Palestine and all those protesting peacefully against the theft of yet more of their land.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

According to former ministers like Al Carns, the UK is facing the imminent threat of war. In a sense, this is always true, because the UK and the US regularly initiate conflict. And while we could simply stop committing ourselves to these illegal wars of aggression, Labour MPs like Carns and Lisa Nandy are instead proposing a fresh round of austerity:

Nandy: "We've got to significantly increase the amount we're spending on defence"

Over the last several days I haven't seen a single interviewer question this claim. Instead the challenge to politicians making it is, are you increasing it fast enough/by enough? pic.twitter.com/H7OA0MHllf

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 14, 2026

Advertisement

Al Carns — Clearly made up danger

In the UK, there’s a cottage industry of ‘defence analysts’ who make the rounds arguing that the UK is on the verge of imminent war with Russia / China / ‘terror’ / etc. The only time they stop making this case is when they’re shilling for Trident, because the argument for nukes is that they’re supposed to make an invasion of the UK impossible.

Al Carns is one of the defence shills who promotes unchecked military expenditure from inside parliament. Carns resigned in spectacular fashion earlier this week, arguing that Britain should be siphoning more money off to the military industrial complex. Carns resignation was pretty much universally praised by the right, because they also want to give endless bungs to defence contractors (in addition to protecting British soldiers from consequences should they commit war crimes):

The focus today is on defence funding. It's clearly mental the PM won't cut welfare to fund our military.

But don't miss what Carns says about Northern Ireland.

The Government's Troubles Bill will see veterans dragged through the courts. If they had any shame, they'd scrap it. https://t.co/2yen2uViDK

— Katie Lam (@Katie_Lam_MP) June 11, 2026

People on the left had criticisms:

How about we owe them not to die in a trench in a foreign country, in a war with no end, and to no end? https://t.co/0POzmA1U5O

— Stop the War Coalition (@STWuk) June 11, 2026

Aaron Bastani of Novara argued your average voter is now mostly deaf to the sabre rattling that successfully riled people up during the Cold War or the War on Terror:

We spend £66 billion on defence, and £18 billion on policing.

Ask the average voter – in Al Carns’ or John Healey’s seat – which is in dire need of more money. Westminster journalists may be surprised! https://t.co/kv32v1H7wA

— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) June 11, 2026

Advertisement

At this point, the cat is out of the bag. People increasingly understand that the government is a machine which transfers wealth from the masses to corporate shareholders. They also know that every military conflict we’ve embroiled ourselves in over the past several decades has been a miserable embarrassment of avoidable slaughter.

We don’t need to spend more money on offshore military bases and deadly weapons; we need to stop pretending we’re a significant global power, because it’s coming at the expense of us being a functional mid-sized nation.

Austerity 3.0

If you’re wondering where the money for more war will come from, the answer is a fresh round of austerity:

Carns is asked where the extra £ for defence should come from.

".. I think there are places, such as moving welfare from hand outs to hand ups"

Describing welfare as hand outs tells us all about Carns politics & who he wants to target – the sick, disabled, low paid, pensioners pic.twitter.com/bfHscrkzCv

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 14, 2026

Advertisement

What’s the point of defending the country if it’s literally just an empty shell?

Carns also bragged about the UK military seizing control of a Russian tanker. As Saul Staniforth notes, we’re very opposed to this sort of thing when Iran does it:

Freedom of navigation must be protected, they say, the Strait of Hormuz must be re-opened, they demand.

Meanwhile in the Channel: pic.twitter.com/6L1yRk8ERl

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 14, 2026

WATCH: The moment Royal Marines board a shadow Russian oil tanker in the English Channel pic.twitter.com/6uLGfcqsl8

— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) June 14, 2026

Lisa Nandy was also at it:

Lisa Nandy boasting that Starmer cut the aid budget to fund more 'defence' spending & confirms we need to increase spending even more to "meet this moment"

The UK is already the 5th highest military spender in the world (only the US, China, Russia and Germany spend more than us) pic.twitter.com/cLCxwEKMEV

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 14, 2026

By population, the UK is the 22nd largest country in the world. Do we really need to be the fifth biggest spender on arms? How does that benefit us?

Let’s not forget, as much as these people cry about ‘defence’, we don’t use these weapons defensively; we use them offensively – and the reason we do so is to create an excuse to buy more weapons.

As Staniforth highlights, it’s austerity which is driving voters to the right. Labour’s solution to this is to implement more austerity:

Lisa Nandy condemns the nasty & divisive politics of Farage & says living standards haven't improved for too long & people want better, along with hope.

Moments before she was confirming the govt is going to make cuts across departments to fund more 'defence' spending. pic.twitter.com/dXtvAvVeFh

Advertisement

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 14, 2026

End of Empire

America and China aren’t laughing at us because we’re no longer a serious military power; they’re laughing because of guys like Al Carns who think we still could be.

Amazingly, this is all happening as Iran has shown you can counter the West’s endless military expenditure with much cheaper technology. And that’s the real threat, isn’t it? Because if you can outclass a multi-million pound missile with a £10k drone, the defence industry suddenly looks much larger than it has any right to be.

This is why the shills are going to scream louder, and why their protests are going to grow ever more ridiculous.

Featured image via Leon Neal (Getty Images) / Christopher Furlong (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

In a letter to Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch has urged Keir Starmer to enter into a pact with her Conservative Party. Her plan is to inflict more austerity on the British public for the sake of giving handouts to greedy defence contractors. And as she notes, Tony Blair is urging Starmer to do the same thing:

Our Armed Forces cannot defend Britain on empty promises and delayed plans.

Keir Starmer’s Defence Ministers resigned as his plan falls short. Their warnings are extremely serious.

I’ve written to the PM offering the support of my MPs to vote to cut welfare to fund defence. pic.twitter.com/aBTSVdOeV8

Advertisement

— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 14, 2026

The question is this: will Keir Starmer agree to work with the worst of all people for the worst possible reasons, or will he be kicked out of office before he gets chance?

Always money for war

By population, the UK is the 22nd largest country in the world; by defence spending, we’re the fifth. This is clearly a hangover from our time as a globe-spanning empire; a hangover which lumps us with a massive bill for unclear benefits. ‘Unclear benefits’ for the public, anyway. Obviously there’s a massive benefit to the arms companies – companies which use their ill-gotten gains to push for more bloodshed – bloodshed which stains the hands that sign the cheques which finance operators like Blair.

Appealing to Starmer, Badenoch penned the following:

Today’s world is more dangerous and threatening than we have known in our lifetimes. Britain and our allies are confronted by authoritarian states who want to destabilise and divide us. Yet in the space of 12 hours your Defence Secretary, Armed Forces Minister and two key Defence Department aides resigned from your Government. They raised extremely serious concerns about our national defence readiness, and the funding of our military. The former Defence Secretary repeated the warning that “if it is our intelligence assessment, and the assessment of other countries in NATO, that there could be an attack by Russia on NATO as soon as 2030”.

Let’s tackle these points in order:

Firstly, the world is definitely “more dangerous and threatening”, and while Russia has contributed to that, let’s not forget our ally Israel’s actions – whether it’s the genocide in Gaza, the war on Iran, or the ethnic cleansing we’re seeing in Lebanon. Buying more weapons won’t stop Israel from dragging us into conflict; it will simply encourage and reward them – especially as we buy from Israeli defence contractors like Elbit Systems.

Secondly, Russia is failing to win against Ukraine – a single nation which is not a nuclear power. The idea that Russia will be powerful enough to attack NATO and then survive the nuclear fallout is ridiculous, whether they attack us in 2030 or 2130.

You are not a serious person if you think otherwise.

Badenoch — The stench of Blair

Badenoch also said:

It is time to get serious. We cannot have our military inadequately funded at a time of growing threats. The funding must also not be backloaded, when the pressures are urgent.

I have made several offers to work with you in the national interest to reduce benefit spending so we can invest more in our defence. Sir Tony Blair, the longest serving Labour Prime Minister, has urged you to accept them.

Gee, we wonder why the disgraced war criminal Tony Blair would view endless conflict as more worthy than the welfare of British citizens?

Lest we forget, Labour didn’t back down on the welfare cuts because Starmer grew a conscious; it backed down because targeting sick and disabled people disgusted the public.

Keir Starmer would have to be entirely devoid of intelligence to sign up to a devil’s pact with Kemi Badenoch and Tony Blair. And that’s the problem; he is entirely devoid of intelligence, and so it seems is his most-likely replacement:

NEW | Andy Burnham confirms he will cut welfare benefits to pour billions into war spending.

The aspiring PM said “I am not squeamish about saying that the plan would be to reduce the welfare bill", insisting he'll slash benefits to "support people into work"

Advertisement

(Via @TheTimes) pic.twitter.com/5NDMVE9hmy

— Stats for Lefties (@LeftieStats) June 13, 2026

Paradoxical

Iran has shown that it’s possible to counter endless Western military expenditure with cheap and cheerful tech like drones, fast boats, and mines. This is an existential threat to the arms industry, because if missiles that cost millions apiece are now redundant, we don’t need to be spending so much on weapons, do we?

To counter this, the war cries are becoming ever more shrill and ever more preposterous.

In other words, expect to hear a lot more from Tony Blair and his apparent fangirl Kemi Badenoch over the coming months.

Featured image via Chris Somodevilla (Getty Images) / WPA Pool (Getty Images) / Carl Court (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

Two Middlesbrough women who set a car on fire in the street, stole property and intimidated innocent local people during far-right riots received jail term of 20 and 22 months. They are already back out on the streets. Anti-genocide protesters who damaged weapons used to murder Palestinian civilians have been jailed for 6 years or more despite being found to have no violent intent. They were held in prison for longer before trial than Megan Davison was sentenced to:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Scott (@thebearded_skot)

Far-right snowflakes

The far-right loves to moan about ‘two-tier policing’. It thinks its the victim. But the victims are those slaughtered and purged by the Israeli colony — and those the British state targets for opposing Israel’s crimes.

Featured image via Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Today, 14 June 2026, the Jewish Anti-Zionist Action (JAZA) group and others protested outside the so-called “Great Israeli Real Estate” event at Edgware United Synagogue. The event is selling off yet more stolen Palestinian land to would-be colonisers.

JAZA has joined hundreds of protestors from a variety of justice groups, including the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), in peaceful protest outside Edgware United Synagogue in London. The event was moved to the synagogue after a first venue pulled out.

Protesters held a prayer service in the street and held a banner stating ‘war crimes out of our synagogues’. Despite the peaceful, even sacred, nature of the demonstration, protesters were still attacked and violently arrested by the Met Police.

The event has generated widespread public opposition, along with condemnation even among MPs. Human rights organisations, legal experts, community groups and elected representatives called for its cancellation and for authorities to immediately investigate the legality of the event and those associated with the event under UK domestic law.

The group said, before beginning its protest, that it was “proud” to participate:

Alongside the more than 100 civil society organisations and the more than 100 MPs that have publicly opposed this event, we are proud to join the peaceful and public protest against the event this Sunday.

Jewish Anti-Zionists reject any attempt to provide a Jewish pretext or justification for these activities and refuse the use of our synagogues to legitimise them. JAZA are appalled that Edgware United Synagogue is hosting this event in the midst of the ongoing genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. That a synagogue would openly engage in enabling the further colonisation of Palestine by giving the event religious and cultural credence is unconscionable. We refuse to allow support for settlement expansion and land theft to be presented as a Jewish communal interest and we reject the conflation of Judaism with a political project built upon the dispossession of another people.

UN figures show that since October 2023, over 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank, 213 of whom were children, have been killed by Israeli settlers and military forces. Settler violence and access restrictions have also led to the displacement of over 1,750 Palestinians this year alone.

JAZA — Starmer targeting Jews

Following the usual pattern of the Starmer regime and its Israel lobbyists, anti-Zionist Jews were disproportionately targeted for arrest. Their prominent presence at anti-genocide and anti-apartheid protests disrupts the Israel lobby’s narrative that all Jews support Israel and its colonisation of Palestine.

Settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories are illegal under international law, and have been found by the ICJ to be in breach of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an occupying power from transferring parts of its civilian population into occupied territory, constituting a war crime.

JAZA’s Talia Woodin said:

As Jews, we are disgusted that companies involved in marketing and developing properties in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank are hosted by a synagogue. These settlements are outposts of extreme violence and exist to terrorise Palestinians and eliminate the possibility of a future Palestinian state.

We are here to fight the false narrative that dangerously conflates Judaism and Zionism, and seeks to weaponise antisemitism to suppress peaceful protests.

We stand in a long tradition of Jewish anti-Zionists who refuse to stand idly by as stolen Palestinian land is occupied, sold and promoted, from protests against settlement-linked property fairs in New York and Toronto to campaigns here in Britain. We are proud to uphold that tradition by joining the protest against the Great Israeli Real Estate Event.

Advertisement

Jewish Anti-Zionist Action is a group of UK-based anti-Zionist Jews acting in solidarity with the wider Palestinian liberation movement by taking direct action to dismantle Zionism.

Featured image via Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

By Skwawkbox

Source link

A massive crowd of around 20,000 people turned out in Belfast on Saturday June 13 to show support for people driven from their homes by racist mobs earlier in the week. The rally, entitled Together Against Hate, was organised by United Against Racism (UAR). Speaking on Instagram, the group said:

This was the biggest anti-racist mobilisation Belfast has ever seen. It reflects the revulsion felt at the 3rd consecutive year of racist pogroms.

Speakers from the trade union movement, community groups, anti-racist organisers and political parties addressed the crowd.

The riots that took place this week were encouraged by those at the top of society. The likes of Elon Musk and Nigel Farage were happy to stoke the flames of racism.

As we’ve already pointed out, the north of Ireland’s problems aren’t caused by immigrants and people of colour. They’re caused by billionaires and the politicians they are able to purchase under a grotesquely unequal and undemocratic political and economic system. UAR concurred, saying:

Migrants did not cause the housing crisis. Migrants did not cause the fuel crisis. Migrants did not defund the NHS. The government is responsible for these failures, and we should not allow ourselves to be fed misinformation which scapegoats the most vulnerable members of our society.

Activist slams PSNI response to pogroms

The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) must also account for their failures. Assistant director of Participation and the Practice of Rights (PPR) Marissa McMahon slammed the police for their response to the wave of ethnic cleansing. She described how a list of houses that were targets of the far-right had been seen online:

On Wednesday as many people know, a list of people’s addresses were circulated widely on the internet.

Rather than get people out, she said the PSNI simply called at people’s doors to:

…tell them that they weren’t safe. Vulnerable people left to fend for themselves.

McMahon went on to describe the heroic efforts of Belfast activists throughout the week, who did the police’s job for them. They entered loyalist areas where the violence was centred, then:

At absolute personal risk to themselves they went into houses, they got families out through back doors and into cars.

She described how PPR:

…worked with the likes of Unison, the Irish language community, the travelling community. These communities who know all too well what discrimination and persecution looks like. And with their help we were able to safely house over 200 families.

McMahon also said authorities should have foreseen the violence. She said PPR had been “mapping this racist violence since 2024”. This means a third summer in a row of racist pogroms should not have come as a surprise. The Guardian recently covered how the Accountability Project Northern Ireland, which tracks far-right activity:

…sent dozens of reports to the PSNI between November 2025 and June 2026.

The police service did not act on these, resulting in the carnage of the last week. Union leaders and political parties also spoke at the demonstration. Alliance, the Green Party, People Before Profit, the SDLP and Sinn Féin all sent representatives. No unionist party provided a speaker to denounce the shocking crimes committed by bigoted thugs.

Belfast Loyalist gang tortured man whose stabbing triggered riots

In other news related to the loyalist-driven riots, a judge refused bail for racist far-right agitator Stephen Baker. He was:

…among four men who appeared at Belfast Magistrates Court in connection with public disorder.

District judge Steven Keown had unusually strong words for Baker. He inverted the racists’ narrative by suggesting that it is the likes of Baker that need to go, rather than the immigrants his ilk want to purge:

People who involve themselves in this or support or encourage these outrageous attacks on our community, and including, as we’ve all seen, outrageous attacks on hard-working and valued members of our society, from all backgrounds and cultures, need to be removed from our society because they pose an existential threat to all of us.

Additionally, the Belfast Telegraph reported that Stephen Ogilvie, the victim of the knife attack which triggered the latest wave of white violence, had previously been tortured by a gang headed by loyalist hoods. The Telegraph says:

Gang member David McCleave ended up being jailed for 14 years for spiking the Rathcoole man [Ogilvie] with a date rape drug and putting lit cigarettes between his toes.

Ogilvie was then stripped, beaten with a baton, had aftershave poured on him and then set on fire.

Shankill Butcher William Moore was also connected to the gang. The Shankill Butchers were among the most notorious killers of the ‘Troubles’. In the 1970s and early ’80s they kidnapped Catholics around Belfast. Using bladed weapons, they subjected their victims to horrific torture before killing them.

The far-right have attempted to portray the attack on Ogilvie as an aberration in Belfast, a form of savagery “alien” to its culture. In reality, it turns out Ogilvie was already tormented by the very people who have always wielded barbaric violence for a supremacist agenda.

Featured image via Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

By Robert Freeman

Source link

Source link

According to one Labour politician, a Reform MP said the following about Makerfield candidate Rob Kenyon:

Chatting to a loose lipped Reform MP today who tells me that they've given up on Makerfield.

"An absolute sh*t candidate and no real understanding of how to tackle a by-election".

— Mike Reader MP (@mike_reader) June 13, 2026

Advertisement

On the one hand, Mike Reader would have every reason to lie about this. On the other, Reform MPs would have every reason to call Kenyon a “sh*t candidate”, because he is.

“No real understanding”

What is it that makes Kenyon such a bad candidate?

Firstly, there are the many controversial statements he’s made in the past that he’s refused to apologise for. As Reform Party UK Exposed summarised:

Rob Kenyon has still not apologised for his homophobic or sexist comments.#Makerfield pic.twitter.com/zg91qJf7eT

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) June 9, 2026

When they say he’s a “sexist”, they say that because Kenyon referred to himself as a “sexist”. He also speculated that:

the majority [of abortions] are for vanity purposes like unwanted pregnancies.

The second problem Kenyon has is that he’s not very good at speaking about or even understanding Reform’s policies:

This might be the worst performance from a political candidate I have ever seen in my life. pic.twitter.com/Kku1RecFJ0

— Ali Milani (@AliMilaniUK) June 2, 2026

This is a problem, because the worse your policies are, the better you need to be at selling them.

The third problem for Kenyon is that he seems to be clueless in general:

Hi @RobKenyonReform, Ashton Library was already saved thanks to the Labour MP Josh Simons (you might of heard of him) and Councillors.

Being that you’ve not bothered to even sign the paperwork for being a councillor, let alone attending your first meeting, it’s no surprise you… pic.twitter.com/kHFkM7zaNi

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) June 2, 2026

Hands and knees

Kenyon’s sexism seems to be a particular problem for voters. As it turns out, many women don’t want to vote for a guy who is prejudiced against women. And in an attempt to counter that, Reform is now begging female voters to get behind Mr Patriarchy:

An important letter to the women of Makerfield. pic.twitter.com/F9ohFne2uT

— Sarah Pochin MP (@SarahForRuncorn) June 13, 2026

Pochin’s post has provided an opportunity to share more of Kenyon’s past comments:

These are the statements you would get if you asked Chat GPT: ‘please provide the top 5 misogynistic comments spoken by dull men who have nothing to offer besides repeating the comments of other dull men‘. His opinions are so stereotypical, in fact, that it reads like he’s playing sexism bingo.

In the final push for Makerfield, Kenyon has also given voters new reasons to suspect him of sexism. Here he is with his “hero” Ant Middleton:

Great to have the endorsement of one of my heroes @antmiddleton pic.twitter.com/zoEq5gU90c

— Cllr Rob Kenyon (@RobKenyonReform) June 12, 2026

This is besides the point, but if you’re a 40-year-old man, your hero shouldn’t be another 40-year-old man; it should be someone you grew up admiring like Keanu Reeves or Mr Motivator.

Middleton is famous for spreading online misinformation — either on purpose or because he’s easily fooled:

Ant Middleton, who wants to be the next mayor of London, shared this AI slops. It's incredible how thick he is. pic.twitter.com/SKguHZy4xw

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) December 5, 2025

Ant Middleton is spreading misinformation and claimed that a church in Yorkshire was attacked.

What actually happened is that, during marches held in March in Mexico to mark International Women’s Day, three churches were vandalised because protesters opposed the Catholic…

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) May 20, 2026

To be fair to him, he has also spread facts; the problem is they were facts he wasn’t supposed to be spreading:

The Ministry of Defence is suing Ant Middleton for spilling secrets about the special forces on a series of social media posts. pic.twitter.com/N8JVqYGszY

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) October 10, 2025

The reason we’re bringing up Middleton in a conversation about sexism is because of his conviction for assaulting a female police officer:

.@UKLabour I would STRONGLY suggest that you remove this post immediately as your statement of myself ‘assaulting’ a female officer is highly misleading and completely false as I’ve never laid a finger on a woman let alone a female Police officer! However doesn’t Labour allow for… https://t.co/FVp4j9MHkZ

— Ant Middleton (@antmiddleton) June 12, 2026

Providing further context on the above, retired solicitor Clive Wismayer explained:

Learn some law. Common assault does not require contact. As I just saved you about £200,000 I’ll invoice you for half.

Also, I read that you later secured employment without disclosing your criminal convictions. If true, you may have committed the offence of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception. I suggest you surrender to the police & make a full confession. I’m only charging fifty quid for that.

Providing more detail on common assault, the Sentencing Council wrote:

A person is guilty of common assault if they either inflict violence on another person – however slight this might be – or make that person think they are about to be attacked.

They do not have to be physically violent – for example, threatening words or a raised fist could lead the victim to believe they are going to be attacked – and that is enough for the crime to have been committed. Other acts like spitting at someone may also classed as common assault.

So Middleton may not have ‘lain a finger’ on a female police officer, but he did do something akin to the above, and this was considered ‘assault’.

Reform — Not what they say they are

Reform wants you to believe that it’s pro-:

• Women.
• Defence.
• Policing.

The fact that they’re hanging out with Middleton shows the party is none of those things.

The fact that Kenyon is the candidate, meanwhile, shows Reform especially doesn’t care about women.

Featured image via Ryan Jenkinson (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link