Politics

McDonnell claims Streeting leadership run is Mandelson-McSweeney’s revenge on Starmer

Published

on

Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell has said publicly that Wes Streeting’s bid to topple Keir Starmer – expected any minute – is “revenge”. He’s alleged revenge by Starmer’s former handlers Morgan McSweeney and his mentor and child-rapist fan Peter Mandelson. Both men were sacked or resigned over the scandal of Starmer’s appointment of Mandelson as ambassador to the US. Starmer has tried desperately to distance himself from Mandelson – completely unsuccessfully – and McDonnell says they’re now collecting payback:

Straight from one Mandelson-McSweeney puppet to another. That’s a grim prospect for a country desperate for real change and a halt to the march of fascism. It seems many agree:

Mandelson has groomed Streeting for years, many think. Certainly enough that Streeting confessed his fear of losing his parliamentary seat to the disgraced Blairite fixer:

Starmer clones

But not everyone agreed. Many think it’s a con – an attempt by the pair to convey an appearance of change while maintaining the same God-awful status quo – continuity kid-starver and genocide-enabler:

Maintenance of the ‘Epstein class’, in other words:

The Epstein links were a recurring theme:

Riding two horses

Others pointed out, accurately, how the ‘Labour Together’ saboteur squad is supporting both sides in the ‘contest’:

And some think it’s Israel’s revenge – though you could be excused for thinking that’s a fake distinction:

Certainly Israel and its lobby – and private healthcare – have just as big a piece of Streeting as they do of Starmer, as Green leader Zack Polanski has previously pointed out:

Streeting appears to have rushed his launch in order to prevent Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham getting into the contest. Certainly Burnham is no panacea, but Streeting and his supporters rightly recognise he’d have no chance against Burnham.

Whether McDonnell is right or wrong, Streeting in Number 10 would be just as appalling news for the many as Starmer has been. Has-been… – that seems very appropriate. If only both of them were ‘never-was’s.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Trending

Exit mobile version