Politics
Newslinks for Sunday 1st March 2026
Iran 1) Regime confirms Khamenei’s death
“Iranian state media has confirmed the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Tasnim and Fars news agencies have confirmed the death of the country’s leader, hours after President Trump said that he had been killed in US-Israeli strikes. “The Supreme Leader of Iran Has Reached Martyrdom,” state broadcaster IRIB reported on Sunday morning.” – Sunday Times
- How the US pulled off the assassination of the century – Sunday Telegraph
- Trump’s bet on Iranian regime change could be his biggest gamble yet – BBC
- Iranians rejoice at death of ‘the devil’ – Sunday Telegraph
- Panic at Dubai Airport as ‘it is hit by an Iranian suicide drone’ and passengers flee wrecked terminal – Mail on Sunday
- Inside Operation Epic Fury – Sunday Times
- Corbyn joins hundreds of pro-Iran protesters in London carrying banners of the Ayatollah – Mail on Sunday
- Why is the US attacking Iran? Trump’s ‘huge gamble’ explained – Mark Urban, Sunday Times
- How the world has reacted – BBC
>Today: ToryDiary: Iranian interventions are a tricky balance of the price, the prize, and the problem with the Prince of Persia
Iran 2) Starmer calls for diplomatic solution
“Sir Keir Starmer has spoken to Donald Trump following strikes that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader – as he urged against further escalation in the Middle East. A spokesperson for the Prime Minister said Sir Keir ‘set out that the UK was taking part in coordinated regional defensive operations to protect British people and regional partners following Iran’s indiscriminate retaliatory strikes on allies in the region’. The Prime Minister had earlier said that British planes are ‘in the sky’ to ‘protect our people, our interests and our allies’ after waves of missile attacks in countries across the region. He also spoke to European leaders – with whom he issued a joint statement calling for a diplomatic solution.” – Mail on Sunday
- Starmer blocked US from using British bases for Iran attack – Sunday Times
- The world’s most evil regime is on the brink – and Britain has nothing to do with it – Jake Wallis Simons, Sunday Telegraph
- UK forces must be ready to help US against Iran’s murderous terror-backing regime – Leader, The Sun on Sunday
- Shut down Iran propaganda machine operating in Britain, Starmer told – Sunday Telegraph
Iran 3) Bolton: Trump needs Iranian commanders to turn on the regime
“When an authoritarian government begins to come apart, it can be every man for himself, both at government’s highest levels, and among the rank and file. This potential is what the resistance must seek to exploit. Find commanders, especially in the regular military and police force, but perhaps even in the IRGC, willing to split from the ayatollahs. Find even a few ayatollahs willing to call for the country’s religious leaders to withdraw from politics and return to their true vocation. Those who abandon ship from the regime may not have the purest of motives but what matters is that they defect to what they should perceive as the winning side.” – John Bolton, Sunday Telegraph
Other comment
- I want a free Iran, but deep down I don’t trust Trump to do it – Matthew Syed, Sunday Times
- Trump has opened Pandora’s box but now is our chance to shape Iran’s future – Tobias Ellwood, Mail on Sunday
- Iran strikes were 47 years in the making. They must succeed. – Leader, Sunday Times
- With the regime teetering, Trump must now finish the job – Leader, Sunday Telegraph
Simons resigns as Cabinet Office Minister
“Josh Simons, the Cabinet Office minister engulfed in the Labour Together scandal, has resigned. Simons was cleared by Sir Laurie Magnus, the independent adviser to the prime minister on ministerial standards, of breaching the ministerial code. However, Magnus said there was a risk of “distraction and potential reputational damage” if he remained in the government.” – Sunday Times
Farage calls for an end to non-British citizens voting in UK elections
“Nigel Farage has sensationally claimed that Reform UK was robbed of victory by foreign-born voters in last week’s Manchester by-election. Amid mounting allegations that voter fraud and sectarianism contributed to the Green Party’s shock win, Mr Farage makes the incendiary assertion in the Mail on Sunday that ‘Reform UK won the Gorton and Denton by-election among British-born voters’. And he vowed that if he becomes Prime Minister he will rip up rules which allow non-British citizens to vote in UK elections. Zack Polanski’s Greens targeted the Muslim vote in Gorton and Denton, focusing their campaign on Gaza and accusing Israel of genocide. The party, which released leaflets and videos in Urdu, has been accused of ‘whipping up hatred’ and exploiting sectarianism to secure victory for their candidate, Hannah Spencer.” – Mail on Sunday
- A grave threat to our democracy – Leader, Mail on Sunday
- Family voting is a monstrous attack on our democracy – Nigel Farage, Sunday Telegraph
- The invisible man whose millions are transforming British politics – The Observer
- A culture war with the Greens will only harm Reform – James Frayne, Sunday Telegraph
- ‘Unlike the Tories, Reform MPs aren’t constantly at each others’ throats’ says Jenrick – Sunday Telegraph
Peers 1) Docherty suspended by Labour after sixth-form college group sexual liaisons
“One of Sir Keir Starmer’s new peers has been suspended by Labour after it emerged that he resigned from a sixth-form college group after conducting sexual liaisons during working hours. Joe Docherty became Lord Docherty of Milngavie last month after being nominated by the prime minister. He was stripped of the party whip on Saturday, pending an investigation.” – Sunday Times
Peers 2) Limb to delay taking up her seat
“One of Sir Keir Starmer’s new peers has said she will not take up her seat until revelations relating to her past are resolved. Dame Ann Limb, an education expert, admitted lying about having a PhD following a Sunday Times investigation last month. She now faces fresh allegations related to her time at City & Guilds, a historic charity which she chaired. She oversaw the sale of the charity’s assets in a secretive deal that saw two executive receive bonuses in excess of £1 million.” – Sunday Times
By-election 1) Starmer still “up for a fight”
“Starmer is certainly keen to project an image of being “up for a fight” with Reform, arguing that despite the Gorton & Denton result, when it comes to a general election the Greens will not be a serious proposition and Labour will still be the rallying point for the majority of the country that wants to stop Farage. “In the last few weeks we’ve seen Keir taking fights on,” says the person close to Starmer. “Taking on Jim Ratcliffe. Taking on Elon Musk. He feels this is the existential fight for our times and he’s at his best when his back is to the wall. This guy’s not going anywhere.” – Sunday Times
- Green surge at next General Election “will topple at least five Labour cabinet ministers” – The Sun on Sunday
- Starmer must now accept the game is up. Forget talk of another relaunch or how voters were duped by an alliance of hard Left activists and drug-addled eco-warriors – Dan Hodges, Mail on Sunday
- Labour must stop channelling Reform and unite with progressives. That’s the lesson from Gorton and Denton – Sadiq Khan, The Guardian
- Starmer’s response to the Gorton and Denton debacle should be a government that truly, finally, reflects him – Tom Baldwin, The Guardian
- Reeves wants her spring statement to calm Labour. Good luck. – Jason Cowley, Sunday Times
By-election 2) Colvile: The real winners may be Kemi Badenoch and Ed Davey
“The rise of the Greens will inevitably drag Labour to the left. Just as the by-election thumping in Chesham & Amersham in 2021 killed any pretence that Boris Johnson was leading a reforming government, so Gorton & Denton is likely push Sir Keir Starmer, or whoever succeeds him, down the same route of desperate and relentless pandering to activists and backbenchers. That, in turn, will open up space in the middle, because many of the things that Labour activists and backbenchers want to do are either bad or unpopular or both. Which could be good news for both the Tories and the Lib Dems, depending on whether Davey can peel off more disillusioned Labour voters than he loses to the Greens, as the new face of protest.” – Robert Colvile, Sunday Times
Ashcroft: Voters think Badenoch has earned the right to a hearing
“The unveiling of Nigel Farage’s senior team illustrated the issue. Some were not sure the line-up of familiar faces from the Johnson-Truss-Sunak years was the change they were looking for. ‘It wasn’t the original plan, was it, to be a load of failed Tories?’ one observed. But the exodus is also an ongoing headache for the Conservatives, signalling the defectors saw little prospect of imminent recovery. Though creeping slowly up, the numbers saying the Tories have changed since their electoral defenestration remain low. Here there is a contrast with Kemi Badenoch herself, who continues to gain recognition with her feisty performances in the Commons and elsewhere. With her most dangerous internal opponent gone, she has begun to rally disheartened Tories and pique the interest of the broader public. Voters think she has earned the right to a hearing. The question is what she is able to do with it.” – Lord Ashcroft, Mail on Sunday
Blair’s Institute warns of minimum wage rise increasing youth unemployment
“Sir Tony Blair’s institute has warned a Government plan to raise the minimum wage for youngsters would choke off the economy. Ministers want to remove age restrictions so that workers aged from 18 to 20 would earn the same as the over-21s. But the Tony Blair Institute says any changes in policy should be “explicitly conditional on economic conditions”. It predicted more rises could “choke off the churn that underpins economic dynamism”. And it claimed higher employer taxes and prioritising Net Zero targets over bills hurts growth. It comes amid warnings the Government’s policies are fuelling record youth unemployment.” – The Sun on Sunday
Poilievre says British Conservatives can learn from Canada
“I ask him about the big debate on the right of British politics: should Reform merge with the Conservatives in Britain, as they did in Canada in 2003 — a move that fundamentally shifted the country’s politics, and led to the new party’s leader Stephen Harper winning three consecutive elections? He pauses, saying he doesn’t want to cast himself as an “oracle that can dictate to our British friends what they should be doing”. He can, however, talk about the journey he was on, having joined Reform in his teens. How do two parties on the right come together? “You start with a Venn diagram of the things that you agree on, that across the coalition you have agreement on. Harper said, ‘Look, we all agree with lower taxes, smaller governments, balanced budgets, tougher criminal justice laws, a stronger military, and so let’s focus on those things as relentlessly as possible’.” By focusing on that, the “tribalism of the different parties kind of melted away … that’s what we did in Canada, and I would say that any conservative coalition today anywhere in the western world has to be very fiercely pro-worker and pro-working class.” – Interview with Pierre Poilievre, Sunday Times
Other political news
- Starmer’s Chagos deal facing legal challenge from Maldives – Sunday Telegraph
- Private schools lose legal challenge over VAT changes – BBC
- Can Anas Sarwar win the Holyrood election with ‘quiet optimism’? – Sunday Times
- Rayner to speak at landlords’ conference about property tax rules in move branded ‘wind up’ – The Sun on Sunday
- Britons in Gibraltar win back lost EU freedom of movement rights – Sunday Telegraph
- Professor who stopped Pathways puberty blocker trial recused over ‘bias’ – Sunday Times
- Man, 38, charged after vandalism of Winston Churchill statue – Sunday Telegraph
- Bank for ultra-rich warns Reeves over entrepreneur exodus – Sunday Telegraph
Hannan: Adam Smith started a revolution 250 years ago. There’s still time to rescue it.
“The best way to soothe these doubts is to read Smith’s book. If you don’t fancy taking on both volumes, Eamonn Butler of the Adam Smith Institute is marking the anniversary by bringing out a short, graphic version, like an Asterix book – which, trust me, is much more gripping than I have made it sound. Smith writes about the world as it is. His work, as we might pretentiously put it, is empirical rather than normative. He could not be less like Karl Marx who, while purporting to be scientific, wrote about an imaginary and, as we now know, impossible world. You have your book, comrades, and we have ours; and ours works in real life, as can be seen by comparing East and West Germany, or North and South Korea.” – Daniel Hannan, Sunday Telegraph
News in brief
- The Iran strikes might be Trump’s Sarajevo moment – Jacob Heilbrunn, The Spectator
- Will Iran’s Islamic Republic survive the US onslaught? – Nicholas Hopton, New Statesman
- Gorton and Denton has changed everything – William Atkinson, CapX
- How Poland forged its economic freedom – Harry Phibbs, Foundation for Economic Education
- Reform can’t make Britain Christian again – Jimmy Nicholls, The Critic
Politics
Why You Shouldn’t Grant Any App ‘Full Access’ To Your Phone Camera Roll
When you decide to upload a photo on to your Instagram or social media, you will face a choice: Are you going to let the app see your entire camera roll or not?
Many of the apps that we use every day will ask if you want to grant the app full access to your phone’s images and videos ― and you should think twice before permitting this, no matter how convenient it is, privacy experts say.
“When you limit access to only select photos, you’re both … protecting yourself from accidentally uploading multiple pictures you do not intend, and ensuring that the app can’t access more than you want, either by accident or malicious intent,” said Thorin Klosowski, a security and privacy activist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Your camera roll doesn’t just have fun photos from vacations and pictures of your families, it’s also a record of who you are and what you like. Many of us often take photos for verification that reveal our identities like passports and new credit cards. These are the kind of images scammers want to exploit. In 2023, researchers discovered that malicious apps were scanning users’ image galleries to hunt for crypto wallet access recovery phrases. Google and Apple later removed these apps from their stores.

milorad kravic via Getty Images
It’s definitely more inconvenient to search through albums to find that one photo you want to post instead of having the full library within an app, but that’s the point. That extra time you take to select one photo forces you to think about what exactly you want to share with an app that may compromise your privacy later.
Meta, in particular, has a long history of concerning privacy advocates. In 2022, Facebook gave police private messages of a mother and daughter facing criminal charges for allegedly carrying out an abortion.
“That’s an especially striking example of how Meta is willing to share data with law enforcement … to continue chipping away at Americans’ privacy and civil rights,” said Will Owen, communication director for the nonprofit Surveillance Technology Oversight Project.
Last year, a Facebook feature asked users to grant access to their phone’s camera roll in order to automatically suggest AI-edited versions of their photos. The pop-up prompt would ask: “Allow cloud processing to get creative ideas from your camera roll?” However, if users permitted this, they also opted into having their images and facial features analyzed by Meta’s AI ― which upset some users. This feature no longer appears available to users within Facebook. Meta did not respond to HuffPost questions about the status of this feature.
In general, you should always double-check what you’re letting an app see from your phone. On Facebook, you can do this by going to the Facebook app, choosing “Settings & Privacy” and then selecting “Camera roll sharing suggestions” within “Settings.” From there, you can toggle on or off the option to “Get camera roll suggestions when you’re browsing Facebook.”
Refusing to grant full access to any one app is one small way to stop yourself from sharing images you would regret later by accident or on purpose.
Klosowski said he’s seen “countless stories over the years of people just accidentally uploading their entire photo libraries to social media because of confusing prompts.”
When you refuse to grant your favourite social media app full access to your camera roll, it will take you more steps to find and select your preferred image, and this will be a bit more of a hassle. “I realise people find the photo picker cumbersome because the user experience is kind of awful,” Klosowski said.
“But a side effect is it also puts a little speed bump in front of you while you’re thinking about whether you should post that photo to begin with, which isn’t always a bad thing,” he continued.
Politics
backlash after interviewer asks why it’s attacking US bases
Social media users have responded with blistering incredulity, outrage and bitter mockery to a US interviewer asking a spokesman why Iran is bombing US bases. His response:
Um, because you’re bombing us from those bases? What do you want me to say?
NBC news anchors asked Iran why it’s justifying attacks on American bases in the region.
“Um, because you’re bombing us from those bases? What do you want me to say? ” pic.twitter.com/P8pZU4L5Ix
— ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ (@LePapillonBlu2) March 1, 2026
Could anything better sum up the dishonesty and stupidity of western media and the entitled arrogance of the US? Even US respondents thought so too:
OK, the person who asked that question – are they a certified fucking idiot? If not, they are a certified, fucking idiot! Lord help us from all these certified fucking idiots.
— IAmMe (@IAmINTJ1) March 1, 2026
Who writes these dumbass questions?
— Michael J Box (@okanaganchild) March 1, 2026
Which right wing oligarch owns NBC.
— Robert Beattie🇦🇺🌏🌊💙🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈🇪🇺🇨🇦🇵🇦 (@beattiers_1958) March 1, 2026
Seriously? That was a fucking question? I guess they think all countries should just let us bomb them and not fight back?
— Turboe4truth 🇺🇸🇺🇸🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🇺🇦🇺🇦 (@turboe4truth) March 1, 2026
Others pointed out how the idiot question entirely fits within the usual western ‘mainstream’ media framing of western imperialism and aggression:
— Varangian of the South Seas (@SouthVarangian) March 1, 2026
— V a n a m o n d e 🌙 (@Vanamonde5) March 1, 2026
Which right wing oligarch owns NBC.
— Robert Beattie🇦🇺🌏🌊💙🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈🇪🇺🇨🇦🇵🇦 (@beattiers_1958) March 1, 2026
They are pro-Israel just like our shitty government. What the fuck kind of question is that to even ask? Like, how can anyone watch this shit and take it seriously?
— Blayzn Baddie 💋🌹💨 (@BlazynBaddie) March 1, 2026
Teleprompter: why Iran attacks civilian targets in the region gaining new enemies while being totally hammered by 🇮🇱 🇺🇸?
Anchors….🤯 pic.twitter.com/jZbCM0iWQl— Don Pedro (@DonPedro_s) March 1, 2026
That news anchor is trying to whip up some manufactured consent. They know the truth but is trying to get Iran to say something they can spin. 🙄
— a succulent bread sandwich meal (@BeefFace80) March 1, 2026
The propaganda in the mainstream media is astounding.
— Alina 🌻 (@alinamercedes) March 1, 2026
But among the many sane respondents, just a few demonstrated that some parts of the US population are no less stupid or blinkered than the media that spoon-feeds them this nonsense. Some were outraged that a spokesman from Iran should be interviewed by US media at all.
Others thought they were being clever by claiming the bombers had come from ships, not from those US bases the ships use. As if in war, you only get to retaliate against the parts of your enemy that are directly involved.
Canary readers please, if you’re ever in a fight and someone punches you with their right hand, you can only hit back on that same right hand — anywhere else is not fair play.
Still others just demonstrated how lacking a gag reflex they are when it comes to swallowing MAGA BS:
That news anchor is trying to whip up some manufactured consent. They know the truth but is trying to get Iran to say something they can spin. 🙄
— a succulent bread sandwich meal (@BeefFace80) March 1, 2026
They’re not – the bombs came from the ships
— Sukicee88 (@sukicee8857454) March 1, 2026
The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.
— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026
And others pointed out how the US allows itself to be led by the nose by the one actual nuclear-armed rogue state in the region:
The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.
— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026
The US didn’t launch ANY of the attacks from bases in the region, because we were told a week ago we couldn’t use them by the countries they are located in.
— Steve Boyette (@im_plane_crazy) March 1, 2026
You can be anti-trump without necessarily siding with terrorist Iran
— kanagasomu (@gosumabrigade) March 1, 2026
Two corrupt states with nuclear weapons and idiots and liars for bosses and mouthpieces are threatening one that is trying to exist flanked by the nuclear armed idiot-liars. One televised interview question was all it took to (again) put a spotlight on it.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Healey Confirms UK Only Acting Defensively Despite Iranian Attacks on British Servicemen and Cyprus Base
Healey Confirms UK Only Acting Defensively Despite Iranian Attacks on British Servicemen and Cyprus Base
Politics
Healey: British Government Now Considering Raising Terrorist Threat Level
Healey: British Government Now Considering Raising Terrorist Threat Level
Politics
Exclusive footage shows Iranian missiles over Doha
Exclusive footage provided to Skwawkbox direct from migrant workers in Doha, Qatar shows large fires from Iranian missile strikes — and continuing barrages overnight from 28 February into the early hours of 1 March 2026.
Iran continues to strike US bases in Doha and Bahrain in retaliation for illegal and unprovoked US and Israeli attacks on its people:
While the air defences in Qatar appear to intercept some of the barrage, other missiles are clearly getting through. The US has tried to deny significant damage to its bases, but at least some of its radar facilities in the region have been destroyed.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Many of Trump’s own voters didn’t want to attack Iran. Now he has to win them over.
President Donald Trump’s overnight strikes are forcing a hypothetical debate into reality.
And a president with extraordinary control over his party’s base will test how far his supporters will follow him on an issue that polling showed divided his coalition.
Just half of 2024 Trump voters, 50 percent, supported military action in a POLITICO poll last month — but 30 percent opposed it. Those fractures, combined with largely unified opposition from Democrats, meant Americans broadly did not want an attack on Iran.
In the January POLITICO poll, nearly half of Americans, 45 percent, said the United States should not take military action in Iran; fewer than one-third, 31 percent, said it should. An Economist/YouGov poll conducted last weekend similarly found broad public opposition to military action in Iran.
The stakes are particularly high for a Republican Party already staring down a difficult midterm landscape, where even small defections from their winning 2024 coalition could carry outsized consequences.
Part of the challenge for Trump is that support for military intervention in Iran was strongest among Trump’s base — and far weaker outside of it. A 61 percent majority of Trump voters who self-identified as “MAGA Republicans” said they support military action, according to The POLITICO Poll conducted Jan. 16 to 19, when Trump was ramping up his rhetoric against Iran but an outright attack remained hypothetical. That’s much higher than the 42 percent of Trump voters who do not identify as “MAGA” who said the same.
That leaves Trump navigating an evolving issue where support within his coalition — at least before the strikes — was real but not overwhelming and where overall public opposition outweighed support.
Democrats were largely unified. Two-thirds of voters who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 said the U.S. should not intervene in Iran, while just 18 percent said it should, the POLITICO survey conducted by Public First found. The Economist/YouGov found 76 percent of Democrats opposed an attack. That Democratic unity is a warning sign for the GOP: It means that before the strikes, there were not enough pro-intervention Democrats to offset the anti-intervention Republicans.
Trump has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to reshape Republican public opinion, bringing his voters along on issues including trade and foreign policy. Whether that pattern holds here may depend on how the conflict unfolds.
“The political risk depends on the outcome,” Michigan-based Republican strategist Jason Roe told POLITICO. “If we break Iran without terrorist attacks coming to America or harm coming to allies in the region, it will be a political win for Trump. … If this expands into a protracted conflict, or ends up with troops on the ground, it will be a liability.”
That dynamic underscores the broader tension inside the modern GOP — a party base deeply loyal to the president and largely unified around an “America First” prerogative, now being tested by his own foreign policy decisions.
The divide also illustrates the longtime debate within the Republican Party between the hawks favoring a more aggressive posture on the world stage and those skeptical of intervention.
Mercedes Schlapp, a senior fellow at the Conservative Political Action Conference, said the length and severity of conflict could determine how Trump’s MAGA base responds.
“I think that the MAGA base will make it very loud and clear to the President that they will not necessarily agree, if it becomes a situation that it becomes a prolonged war,” she said on C-SPAN’s Ceasefire earlier this week.
Polling was already showing early signs of skepticism about overseas entanglements, including among Republicans. A February POLITICO Poll found that 47 percent of Americans said the U.S. government is too focused on international issues and not focused enough on domestic ones, while roughly one-quarter said it is striking the right balance.
The question did not reference Trump directly. Even so, 41 percent of his 2024 voters said the U.S. government is too focused on international issues, including about half — 49 percent — of Trump voters who do not consider themselves MAGA Republicans.
Those non-MAGA Trump voters are especially important for the GOP heading into November, and the president’s ability to overcome their initial opposition could prove crucial to maintaining control of Congress. Otherwise, if they swing back to Democrats — or sit out the midterms — Trump’s base alone is not enough to carry his party to midterm successes.
Politics
Why Does My Mind Race At Night? It Could Be Your Body Clock
Researchers increasingly think that our Circadian rhythm, or body clock, matters more to our sleep than we realise. In fact, one study suggested our internal rhythm might matter more than sleep duration when it comes to feeling rested.
And in an Australian paper, which was published in Sleep Medicine, researchers found that people who struggle with racing thoughts that keep them up at night seem to have differences in their Circadian rhythm.
“Unlike good sleepers, whose cognitive state shifted predictably from daytime problem-solving to nighttime disengagement, those with insomnia failed to downshift as strongly,” the study’s lead researcher, Professor Kurt Lushington, said.
Why might people with racing thoughts at night have different body clocks?
In this research, scientists placed 32 adults (half of whom had insomnia; the other half were healthy sleepers) in an environment with as few external body clock cues as possible.
They were placed in a bed in a dimly-lit room for 24 hours, with carefully-measured food and activity. This was done to isolate the participant’s Circadian rhythms.
The scientists noticed that, even with no factors like sunlight, most participants’ body clock worked roughly in tandem in the daytime: their mental acitivty was highest in the morning and tapered off in the afternoon.
But among the insomniacs, whose racing thoughts kept them up at night, some differences were noted later on.
Not only was their “cognitive peak” – the time at which their mind was busiest – 6.5 hours later, on average, than those without insomnia, but, Dr Lushington said, “Their thought patterns stayed more daytime-like in the nighttime hours when the brain should be quietening”.
Sleep, he added, is “about the brain disengaging from goal-directed thought and emotional involvement.
“Our study shows that in insomnia, this disengagement is blunted and delayed, likely due to circadian rhythm abnormalities. This means that the brain doesn’t receive strong signals to ‘power down’ at night.”
Is there anything I can do to stop my brain racing at night?
According to study co-author Professor Jill Dorrian, this research could help to guide insomnia treatments which focus on sufferers’ body clocks in the future.
“These include timed light exposure and structured daily routines that may restore the natural day-night variation in thought patterns,” she said (sleep experts have previously recommended getting some outdoor morning light if you can, as this helps to regulate our Circadian rhythm).
Additionally, Professor Dorrian ended, “Practising mindfulness may also help quieten the mind at night”.
Politics
UK Defence Secretary John Healey Silent On Iran Strikes Support
John Healey has refused to say whether the UK government backs the US and Israeli bombing of Iran which killed the country’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The defence secretary would only confirm that Britain “played no part” in the military action.
Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard confirmed in the early hours of Sunday that Khamenei had died, and said it would launch its “most-intense offensive operation” against American and Israeli targets in response.
That led to Donald Trump warning they “better not do that, because if they do we will hit them with a force that has never been seen before”.
Countries across the Middle East have already been attacked by Iran as tensions in the region threaten to explode into a full-blown war
Nevertheless, Healey refused to be drawn on the government’s position when asked by the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.
She asked the cabinet minister whether he thought the American and Israeli action was “reckless or do you think it was right”?
Healey said: “We played no part in these strikes as Britain.”
But Kuenssberg told him: “We know that, you’ve said that already. But this is a moment of history.
“Everyone watching this morning will want to know and expect to know from their government is Britain on the side of those two countries who have killed Iran’s Supreme Leader?”
Healey said: “I think people watching will want to know now, today, that Britain is on top of what’s necessary to do what we can to keep them safe, to reinforce regional stability, prevent further escalation, and that’s my task and that’s my priority as defence secretary of the UK.”
The US and Israel described Saturday’s attacks on Iran as a “pre-emptive” strike against a Tehran government intent on developing nuclear weapons.
It retaliation from Iran, with strikes reported in several Gulf countries including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.
In a statement from Downing Street on Saturday, Keir Starmer said the UK “played no role” in the strikes on Iran.
“But we have long been clear – the regime in Iran is utterly abhorrent,” he added.
“They have murdered thousands of their own people, brutally crushed dissent, and sought to destabilise the region.”
Starmer said Iran “must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon” and called for the resumption of diplomatic efforts to prevent that from happening.
He said: “Iran can end this now. They should refrain from further strikes, give up their weapons programmes, and cease the appalling violence and repression against the Iranian people – who deserve the right to determine their own future, in line with our longstanding position.
“That is the route to de-escalation and back to the negotiating table.”
Politics
“Few people will mourn the Ayatollah’s death” – Healey
‘Iran and the regime Ayatollah Khamenei has led for so long, it’s a source of evil’
Defence Secretary @JohnHealey_MP tells @TrevorPTweets: ‘Few people will mourn the Ayatollah’s death’
Latest: https://t.co/e3lpOq42Nx pic.twitter.com/6HPq8ZwtWk
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 1, 2026
Politics
Bahrain citizens cheer as Iranian missiles strike US base
Bahrainis have been filmed cheering “like it’s New Year’s fireworks” as a new barrage of Iranian missiles hit a US base in Bahrain:
The footage brings to mind scenes from the June 2025 ’12-day war’ in which Palestinians cheered as they watched Iranian missiles slam into their oppressor’s military facilities.
The small island in the Persian Gulf, which was a British protectorate (also read: colony) in the 19th century, has a majority Shia population and a Sunni king. In 2011, Bahrain saw a popular uprising violently crushed by an army from Saudi Arabia and its allies, which remain stationed (also read as occupying) on the island.
Iran’s strikes on the US and Israel are in retaliation for the axis’s unprovoked attacks on Iran, which murdered hundreds on 28 February 2026, including at least 85 schoolgirls and their teachers.
Featured image via the Canary
-
Sports6 days agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Iris Top
-
Politics6 days agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Business5 days agoTrue Citrus debuts functional drink mix collection
-
Politics3 days agoITV enters Gaza with IDF amid ongoing genocide
-
Sports1 day ago
The Vikings Need a Duck
-
Tech10 hours agoUnihertz’s Titan 2 Elite Arrives Just as Physical Keyboards Refuse to Fade Away
-
Crypto World5 days agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Tech5 days agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting
-
NewsBeat20 hours agoDubai flights cancelled as Brit told airspace closed ’10 minutes after boarding’
-
Business7 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
NewsBeat4 days agoCuba says its forces have killed four on US-registered speedboat | World News
-
NewsBeat1 day agoThe empty pub on busy Cambridge road that has been boarded up for years
-
NewsBeat4 days agoManchester Central Mosque issues statement as it imposes new measures ‘with immediate effect’ after armed men enter
-
NewsBeat6 days ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
Tech7 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat16 hours agoAbusive parents will now be treated like sex offenders and placed on a ‘child cruelty register’ | News UK
-
NewsBeat7 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics7 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
Business3 days agoDiscord Pushes Implementation of Global Age Checks to Second Half of 2026
