Connect with us

Politics

Newslinks for Thursday 5th February 2026

Published

on

Newslinks for Friday 30th January 2026

Starmer crisis 1) PM fights for his future over Mandelson scandal

“Sir Keir Starmer and his chief of staff are fighting for their political futures after the prime minister admitted he was warned about Lord Mandelson’s friendship with the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein before appointing him as ambassador to the US. Starmer told the Commons that he was aware of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein, including the fact that the peer stayed at the financier’s Manhattan apartment while he was in jail for child prostitution offences. Starmer claimed that Mandelson had “lied” about the depth and extent of his relationship with Epstein, but the prime minister faced a backlash from his own MPs. One cabinet minister said the appointment of Mandelson was “very hard to defend” and was “yet another self-inflicted wound”. – The Times

  • Starmer engulfed in leadership speculation as he backtracks over Mandelson papers – FT
  • Labour MPs say Starmer’s days are numbered amid fury over Mandelson – Guardian
  • Starmer in grave peril – Daily Mail
  • PM fights desperate last stand – Daily Express
  • Mutinous Labour MPs taking control of party – The Sun
  • Starmer ‘shakes’ with ‘anxiety’ – Daily Express
  • Pressure grows on McSweeney over Mandelson ambassador appointment – FT
  • How Mandelson’s protege became Starmer’s right-hand man – Daily Telegraph
  • The ex-minister in charge of the Mandelson files – Daily Telegraph
Comment

Starmer crisis 2) Rayner leads Labour MPs in revolt against Starmer

“Angela Rayner has forced Sir Keir Starmer into an about-turn over his handling of the Lord Mandelson scandal. The Prime Minister’s own MPs are calling for him to consider his position after the planned release of documents relating to Lord Mandelson’s appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the US descended into chaos. The files were set to be released by the Prime Minister’s most senior civil servant. But in a severe blow to Sir Keir’s authority, Downing Street was forced to hand the process to Parliament’s intelligence and security committee (ISC) after Ms Rayner and senior Labour MPs insisted No 10 should not decide what material is published.” – Daily Telegraph

  • Mandelson’s web of influence inside the Labour Party – The Times
  • Epstein told Mandelson he was hiring strippers to celebrate prison release – Daily Telegraph
  • What Starmer knew – The Times
  • Mandelson offered to help Epstein get Russian visa, documents suggest – BBC News
  • Farage calls for EU to investigate Mandelson’s time in Brussels – FT
>Yesterday:

No 10 confident Trump won’t block Chagos Islands deal

“Downing Street believes that it is close to securing renewed support from the US for its deal to hand back the Chagos Islands to Mauritius despite President Trump labelling the plan an “act of great stupidity”. The president appeared to withdraw his support for the proposal during the row over Greenland, despite having endorsed the plan last year. His change of heart threatened the future of the deal, and ministers privately conceded that the islands could not be returned without America’s blessing because of the importance of the Diego Garcia military base. The Tories have also been lobbying members of the administration to block the handover of the islands, warning that it could allow China a strategic foothold in the islands.” – The Times

Streeting to offer resident doctors bigger pay rise to end dispute

“Wes Streeting is to offer resident doctors a bigger pay rise than other NHS staff as part of a new package of measures to try to end their long-running dispute. The health secretary also plans to guarantee resident doctors in England that hospitals will be fined if they do not give them good working conditions, such as rest areas and access to hot food. Streeting is looking at making a series of improvements to previous offers he has made, which may persuade the British Medical Association (BMA) to call off its nearly three-year-long campaign of industrial action.” – Guardian

Ban on illegal migrants taking taxis to hospital comes into force

Illegal migrants have been banned from taking costly taxis to hospital — as Labour admits small boat numbers may still rise. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has put a stop to the cabs perk following a public outcry. But she was also forced to concede that there was no guarantee Channel small boat crossings would fall this year. Taxpayers are forking out £16 million a year on transport for hotel migrants on top of accommodation costs. One asylum seeker took a taxi 250 miles to see a GP. From today, cabs will be allowed only for the pregnant and those with physical disabilities and they will require sign-off from the Home Office.” – The Sun

Advertisement
  • Ban on asylum seekers taking taxis to medical appointments comes into force – Daily Mail

Farage’s two-day trip to Davos cost more than £50,000, documents reveal

“Nigel Farage’s two-day trip to Davos cost more than £50,000 after he was given two guest passes by an Iranian-born billionaire, documents show. The Reform UK leader officially declared his attendance at the conference on the register of MPs’ interests, after giving speeches at the Switzerland summit in which he pledged to “put the global elites on notice”. Despite previously having dismissed the World Economic Forum as a jaunt for “globalists”, Farage also accepted £1,100 of luxury hotel accommodation from the conference organisers.” – Guardian

  • Companies House should probe origins of £200,000 gift to Reform, senior MP says – FT
  • Reform councillor steps down as head of Kent’s cost-cutting drive – FT
Other political news
  • Connolly’s racial hatred charge was fast-tracked – Daily Telegraph
  • Palestine Action activists acquitted amid ‘jury tampering’ claims – The Times
  • Sanctions having ‘significant impact’ on Russian economy – Guardian

And finally, A mouse scurries behind Badenoch during Peston interview

“As the Mandelson scandal engulfs the Government, Kemi Badenoch had a prime moment on television to capitalise for the Tories. But it was a surprise guest who stole the show – a mouse scurrying in the background. The Conservative leader was caught unawares during an ITV interview with Robert Peston on Wednesday, when she demanded that Sir Keir Starmer release information about the appointment of Lord Mandelson as ambassador to the US. Mrs Badenoch appeared not to notice the rodent dashing out from behind a table in her Westminster office as she told Mr Peston that Labour “had to give in” over the fallout from a tranche of files detailing Lord Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.” – Daily Telegraph

News in Brief

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Zarah Sultana knows how to defeat Reform

Published

on

Zarah Sultana knows how to defeat Reform

Zarah Sultana has thrown her support behind the Green Party’s Gorton and Denton candidate, Hannah Spencer. In doing so, she’s demonstrated exactly how solidarity on the left should work. In a statement, Sultana said:

The candidate list is now published and it is clear that Hannah Spencer, a local plumber and trade unionist, is the strongest challenger to Labour and Reform. ​ I am, therefore, giving my personal critical support to her and the Green Party in this by-election, and I urge others to do the same.

I have always been clear that the left is strongest when it is united. ​ Our real opponents are not one another. ​ They are Reform and the far-right.

However, Sultana’s comments are unfortunately at odds with a statement from the Grassroots Left slate for Your Party – who she backs.

Zarah Sultana at odds with the Grassroots Left

Your Party (YP) had already issued a statement outlining that after deliberation with local members, it had decided that a YP candidacy would not serve their ‘collective goals’ of defeating Reform. But, the Grassroots Left (GL) slate subsequently stated that:

Advertisement

Grassroots Left will not lend unconditional support to the Green Party candidate, because the Greens are a pro-capitalist, pro-Nato party and have been enforcing cuts in councils all over the country.

Many people from across the leftist spectrum have, rightly, been pointing out this is an immature and short-sighted approach in the face of rising fascism.

Zarah Sultana’s statement came after the GL left one, and is interesting for outlining exactly why, on that statement, GL got it wrong:

In particular, it’s worth looking at one passage from Sultana:

Advertisement

As a young Muslim woman, I understand viscerally what it would mean for the far-right to gain power in this country. This is not an abstract debate for me, nor the millions of people across the country whose safety would be directly affected.

Ultimately, this is what the Gorton and Denton by-election has turned into: a testing ground that is an opportunity for the Green party to show that people are coming together to reject the fascism of Reform. And, Sultana’s comments show exactly what happens when a socialist who has lived experience of racism can do when understanding the very real cost of parties like Reform. This isn’t an abstract political debate for many people in this country.

It is a reality that has material consequences. In choosing to focus on other policy issues, rather than the much more immediate threat of Reform, GL have shown naive judgement that is disappointing to see.

No more ‘whip’: Pluralism strengthens movements – it doesn’t weaken them

However, this rather public disagreement is not a dramatic sign of a ‘rift.’ Instead, it is another sign that Sultana is well practiced at productive disagreements that make the movement stronger. Unity does not require uniformity. Leftists are not required to agree on every single point. Instead, we must be able to unite when necessary to resist racism and fascism.

In what many onlookers will probably view with understandable frustration, a heated battle of the factions will soon be underway with the Central Executive Elections (CEC) of Your Party due to take place on the 26th February. Apparent differences in mission have driven a divergence among members, signaling an existential moment for the movement. Namely, Jeremy Corbyn has endorsed the For the Many slate, while Sultana has endorsed the Grassroots Left slate.

Advertisement

Unity does not mean compliance

It is worth noting, the GL statement has faced pushback from within the group itself, with some members expressing dissatisfaction with the tone it adopted.

Chloe Walker, CEC Northwest candidate standing on the Grassroots Left slate shared her views on the difference in views amongst members in the community-grounded movement. She told the Canary:

Personally as I’ve stated previously, I think that the most prevalent sentiment amongst local members is correct – it would have been nice to back a candidate, Tony Wilson, but the party’s not in a place to be able to fight a campaign like this at present, because of how slow and disempowering the founding process has been. I don’t think we should be going out of our way to criticise the Greens or their candidate in this instance – she’s a strong candidate in any case and I’d obviously rather see them than Labour or Reform win here. But we don’t have to come out and back the Greens to the hilt, either. Individual YP members might choose to help out with their campaign, and that’s their prerogative. But we shouldn’t use party infrastructure to support them; we have to retain some independence while we try to carve out a political identity that is visibly distinct from that of GPEW. Our intervention should be limited to criticising the Labour and Reform candidates, if we feel inclined to make any statement on an election we’re not involved with.

Walker added:

specific views towards this by-election do vary amongst GL candidates, reflecting our commitment to a pluralistic and open party where members have the autonomy and mutual respect to disagree while still remaining committed to broader shared political goals.

Ashley Walker, a Grassroots Left member from Stockport also stated:

Advertisement

Despite what some people think the Grassroots Left does not belong to any one person alone, it belongs to every member of every group who is a part of it. And if we win this election the CEC we form, and the party it will help build, will belong not to us but to every member of this party. Because without true democracy there will never be socialism.

No more top-down control: Left unity in action

We published a piece on Monday on Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq’s plea to factions on the left to unite against the billionaire-funded fascist threats facing all of us. Alnaouq pleaded:

My friends, fascism is not at the doorsteps in the UK. It is here. And unless we join forces with each other, unless we hold hands, we will not be able to defeat it. And we don’t have the luxury for trial and waiting. We do not have time. We have to act. My friends, we have the numbers. We have the resources. We have the support of the people. What we don’t have is organisation. We need to learn how to work with each other in order to defeat fascism, in order to defeat far-right, in order to defeat Zionism. And we must never shy away from calling ourselves anti-Zionists because we are anti-Zionists.

Sultana has shown that unity does not require spoon-feeding members the statements they are permitted to make. Grassroots Left has demonstrated that it will not submit to control by powerful figures and will instead maintain autonomy over its messaging. They have also worked collaboratively and supportively with independent candidates to advance a shared mission for a transparent, democratic, and accountable political party.

While work remains to build robust democratic processes that ensure such statements genuinely reflect the will of its membership, a powerful movement is clearly emerging: one that challenges the dominance of privileged public figures and meaningfully empowers its members.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Hill: ‘In a democracy, the leaders you get are your fault’

Published

on

Hill: ‘In a democracy, the leaders you get are your fault’

The post Hill: ‘In a democracy, the leaders you get are your fault’ appeared first on Conservative Home.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

LIVE: Farage Makes ‘Special Announcement’ in Wales

Published

on

LIVE: Farage Makes ‘Special Announcement’ in Wales

Nigel Farage is in Newport this morning to make a ‘special announcement.’ He’s expected to unveil Reform’s Wales leader. 91 days until the Senedd elections…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Adolescence Writer Reacts To Stephen Graham’s Season 2 Comments

Published

on

Adolescence Writer Reacts To Stephen Graham's Season 2 Comments

After Stephen Graham teased fans with a recent update about a potential season two of Adolescence, his co-creator has added his thoughts to the topic.

Last month, after collecting the Golden Globe for his performance as father Eddie Miller in the Netflix drama, Stephen was asked about the chance of the show returning for a second series.

“I cannot answer that question because it’s somewhere in the deep recesses of my mind and Jack [Thorne, his co-creator]’s mind, and we’ll pull it out in three or four years,” he told reporters in the awards show’s press room.

Weeks later, during a recent appearance on The One Show, award-winning screenwriter Jack Thorne said there could likely be a second season of the Netflix drama, but fans might be in for a wait.

Advertisement

“There’s not going to be a second series that involves the Miller family,” he confirmed to presenters Alex Jones and Lauren Laverne.

“So, if we ever do anything else with the format, which we might do in years to come [it won’t involve the Millers]. But we’ve got nothing at the moment.”

He also admitted: “Stephen said there might be something at the back of our brains somewhere, there isn’t anything. I’ve got this brain and I know Stephen’s brain and there is nothing there at the moment, but give us time and there might be something else.”

Adolescence is the sixth project Stephen and Jack worked on together, and they are both keen that it won’t be the last.

Advertisement

“We love the one shot format, so if we were going to do something else using the one-shot format, that might be a sort of… at the moment, there’s nothing,” Jack told the BBC show.

It’s no surprise the writing duo keep getting asked about a second series.

Adolescence is one of Netflix’s highest rated and most-watched shows, making UK TV viewing history last year when it was watched by 6.45 million people in its first week, and was subsequently nominated for 13 Emmys, winning nine.

Not only did it make a star of its lead, Owen Cooper, who will next be seen in Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights as a young Heathcliff, but it also made Stephen and Jack two of the most in-demand creators in television.

Advertisement

Jack was appearing on the One Show couch to promote his new adaptation of Lord Of The Flies, which will air on BBC One on Sunday 8 February at 9pm.

All four episodes of Adolescence are streaming now on Netflix.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Noel Gallagher’s Special Brit Award Win Raises Eyebrows For 1 Reason

Published

on

Noel Gallagher's Special Brit Award Win Raises Eyebrows For 1 Reason

The news that Noel Gallagher is to receive a special award at this year’s Brits has left some music fans with questions.

On Wednesday night, the Brit Awards announced that during the 2026 ceremony, which is due to take place in Noel’s hometown of Manchester later this month, the Oasis singer will be picking up the Songwriter Of The Year Award, which has previously been given to the likes of Raye, Charli XCX and Ed Sheeran.

lyrics that have inspired generations of people@NoelGallagher is taking home Songwriter of the Year at The BRIT Awards 2026 🏆

Watch the show live Saturday 28th February on ITV1 & ITVX in the UK and on YouTube globally pic.twitter.com/p3AuAi5CRj

— BRIT Awards (@BRITs) February 4, 2026

Advertisement

Now, there’s no denying that Oasis had an absolutely epic year in 2025, with their sold-out reunion tour leading to a chart resurgence that at one point meant three of the band’s albums were all back in the UK top five at the same time.

As the primary songwriter in Oasis, he also penned hits like Live Forever, Wonderwall, Don’t Look Back In Anger and Champagne Supernova, and has gone on to enjoy success with his group Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds.

However, it still hasn’t escaped some people’s attention that Noel’s Songwriter Of The Year award comes at the end of a year in which he… well… hasn’t actually shared any new material…

but he didn’t write any songs in 2025 😂

— Allen Walton (@allenwalton) February 4, 2026

Advertisement

That being said, others were still thrilled to hear about Noel’s latest accolade…

How does this work, exactly?

Noel hasn’t released any new material in the past year, solo or Oasis.

Is this just off the back of the tour and people remembering he’s NOEL FUCKING GALLAGHER and therefore great? https://t.co/Zml3xiOwaK

— Benjamin (@BenBobBill) February 5, 2026

Advertisement

My man’s winning without releasing any new music. GOAT

— Francesca (@francesca_312) February 5, 2026

It’s also been pointed out that in 2013, Noel claimed he would not be attending the Brit Awards again unless he were to be recognised with an award for his songwriting.

Brit Awards committee chair Stacey Tang enthused: “For more than three decades, Noel has crafted songs that have become part of our collective story – bold, brilliant, and always recognisable.

“His songs have soundtracked memories for multiple generations and defined the spirit of British music globally. Honouring Noel as Songwriter Of The Year celebrates a remarkable body of work and a creative force that continues to connect and inspire artists and fans worldwide.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Mark Ronson is also set to receive the Outstanding Contribution prize at the upcoming Brits, where Jacob Alon will be awarded the Critics’ Choice title.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Peppa Pig’s New Deaf Storyline Hits Home For Parents Like Me

Published

on

Peppa Pig’s New Deaf Storyline Hits Home For Parents Like Me

When my son was born profoundly deaf, I suddenly understood how isolating it can feel when the world doesn’t reflect your experience.

As a parent, I wanted him to see that his hearing loss didn’t define him, but I didn’t know where to start. I’d grown up as a child of deaf parents, but television never showed families like mine.

We were invisible. And I feared my son would feel the same.

That’s why the new Peppa Pig storyline, in which George (Peppa’s younger brother) is revealed to be deaf, feels so powerful.

Advertisement

It’s the first time many children, and their parents, will see a character like George navigating hearing loss in a mainstream children’s show.

It’s not just entertainment; it’s representation that can reassure children that they belong, and that differences are normal.

Watching George go for a hearing test and start using a hearing aid is the kind of story I wish I’d had when my son was little.

The storyline makes it clear that hearing technology can help, but it doesn’t fully restore typical hearing, whilst also giving parents the language to start conversations and explain hearing loss in ways that are relatable and reassuring.

Advertisement

For parents who are just discovering their child may have hearing loss, it can feel overwhelming. You may notice signs like delayed speech, talking too loudly or too softly, difficulty responding to sounds, or watching closely what others are doing before doing it themselves.

My advice to parents is to trust your instincts. If something feels off, it’s always worth speaking to your GP. You can also contact us at the National Deaf Children’s Society for one-to-one advice and guidance, as well as local support in the heart of your community. Early support can make a huge difference in a child’s development, confidence and communication skills.

Storylines like George’s also make hearing technology visible. Many children wear hearing aids or other devices, and yet these are rarely seen in everyday media.

Seeing George explore the world with a hearing aid – splashing in puddles, going to the park, playing with Peppa – reinforces that deaf children can fully enjoy childhood experiences. Representation like this is not just comforting, it is empowering.

Advertisement

Of course, no single story can capture every experience, but authenticity matters. These new episodes were developed with guidance from our team at the National Deaf Children’s Society, and they reflect the realities of deaf children’s lives, from navigating appointments to adjusting to new sounds. That kind of insight makes the representation credible, relatable, and ultimately supportive for families.

For me, it’s deeply personal. As a parent, I want my son to grow up seeing himself reflected in the world around him, feeling confident that his deafness doesn’t set limits on what he can do. And as a child myself of deaf parents, I know that seeing stories like this could have helped my parents feel more visible when they were raising me.

Peppa Pig may be a cartoon, but for deaf children and their families, it sends a real-world message: you are seen, you are valued, and your experiences matter.

And for parents, it is a reminder that seeking support, trusting your instincts, and sharing stories with your children can help them feel safe, confident, and understood.

Advertisement

George Crockford is CEO at The National Deaf Children’s Society, which supports deaf children with any level of hearing loss, offering expert information, practical guidance and one-to-one support for families, as well as local support in communities across the UK.

The new Peppa Pig episodes will air on Milkshake from 9th March. For more information and to explore resources for deaf children and families, visit www.ndcs.org.uk/georgepig.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | Illegal gambling is a gift to criminals

Published

on

Illegal gambling is a gift to criminals
Illegal gambling is a gift to criminals

Credit: Adobe Stock

Keith Bristow, Chair of the Betting and Gaming Council’s Gambling Anti-Money Laundering Group (GAMLG)



Keith Bristow, Chair of the Betting and Gaming Council’s Gambling Anti-Money Laundering Group (GAMLG)
| Betting and Gaming Council

Advertisement

I have spent the vast majority of my career working to understand how criminals operate and protecting the public from their criminality.

Over the past decade, since leaving law enforcement and now chairing the Betting and Gaming Council’s Gambling Anti-Money Laundering Group (GAMLG), one trend has become increasingly clear to me: the illegal gambling market is getting worse, not better. 

Advertisement

I take no position for or against gambling. For many it is simply a lawful leisure activity. My concern is that gambling should not be used for illegal purposes, and the illegal black market crosses that line every day. 

Criminals weigh risk against reward when it comes to selecting the victims they wish to target and the methods they choose, and illegal gambling currently offers one of the most favourable balances they can find. Crucially, as the regulated sector has strengthened its compliance measures, the illegal market has grown more sophisticated. It has no age checks, no safer gambling protections, no anti-money-laundering controls and no tax contribution. It creates opportunities for criminals to move money with minimal challenge, and the nature and scale of associated offending is too often not understood or overlooked. 

Independent EY analysis, following last year’s Budget, shows the future consequences clearly: more than £6bn in stakes diverted to illegal operators and a 140 per cent increase in the size of the black market. This weakens the regulated sector and reduces long-term tax revenues. 

Advertisement

The UK already has a regulatory system designed to protect consumers and uphold integrity, and the licensed market plays its part in meeting those expectations. But no system is effective without robust enforcement and illegal operators are expanding with very little resistance from decision makers and those charged with enforcing the law. We should be asking what is being done to address this, where the money goes, what wider criminality it enables and why an unregulated market is being allowed to operate with so little scrutiny. 

The additional £26m for the Gambling Commission in the Budget is welcome and necessary. The key question now is what difference it will make in practice: how will this funding increase the risks for those who operate illegally and protect the public from them? 

Everyone should comply with the law and with the regulations designed to protect consumers. BGC members are already investing in compliance, strengthening controls and enforcing responsible standards. But their efforts are undermined if illegal operators continue to grow beyond the reach of effective enforcement. 

As long as the black market remains a low-risk and high-reward environment for criminals, it will continue to expand, and that must change. So I ask government and the Gambling Commission directly: what are you going to do to ensure the black market is not a risk-free enterprise? Unless that question is answered and action follows, the public will be exposed to harm while criminal activity continues unchecked. 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Greenlands PM Denies Talk Of Deal With Trump And Nato

Published

on

Greenlands PM Denies Talk Of Deal With Trump And Nato

Greenland’s prime minister has dismissed Donald Trump’s claims that he and Nato had discussed a deal over the Arctic island’s sovereignty.

The US president backed down over his demands to “control” the semi-autonomous Danish territory two weeks ago, claiming a “framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland” was on the table.

But Jens-Frederik Nielsen poured cold water on his Nato remarks last night.

Speaking to Piers Morgan Uncensored, he said: “It’s not my understanding that they’ve discussed a deal.”

Advertisement

However, he added: “We do agree on, we need to do more in a Nato frame in terms of security.

“They will talk about something that maybe could be a deal in some way but we have also said and emphasised we have some really important red lines from our side.”

Details about any Nato arrangement over the island remain unclear, although some reports claim Denmark could cede sovereignty over small parts of Greenland to allow America to build military bases.

Yet Nielsen said: “We have a clear red line, in terms of our borders, our integrity as a country, if somebody wants to push on those we can say that’s a clear red line for us. We are not giving an inch. We will never cede any sovereignty.”

Advertisement

Trump previously suggested paying the islanders or even using US military force to invade the territory last month.

He insisted the island was essential to America’s security amid growing threats from China and Russia within the Arctic Circle.

But his aggression sparked major backlash among Nato allies and European leaders – including British prime minister Keir Starmer – made it clear the territory’s future was up to Greenland and Denmark alone.

Trump furiously threatened to slap 10% import tariffs on the countries which did not allow the US to take over Greenland up until he struck his “framework of a future deal” with Nato chief Mark Rutte.

Advertisement

Nielsen rejected the idea of taking any payment from the US too, saying: “Our right to self-determination is not something we would want to gamble on. I think it’s outrageous if you think you can buy the Greenlandic people.”

The PM also criticised the White House after it circulated a meme of Trump holding the hand of a penguin through a snowy landscape, implied to be Greenland.

Nielsen said he thought they should stop promoting such images, adding: “We don’t have one single penguin in Greenland! I think it shows a lack of knowledge about Greenland, about Greenlandic people and the Greenlandic society… I think it’s unfortunate. When you keep mocking my people… I think it’s insulting.”

Watch the full interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored, YouTube.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saturday Night Live UK Cast: Full List Of Performers Confirmed

Published

on

The full cast of Saturday Night Live UK

The comedians forming the cast of the new British version of Saturday Night Live have been unveiled.

Just under a year ago, it was announced that SNL – which has been a staple of US screens for the last 50 years – would be getting its own British iteration for the first time in 2026.

As is the case with the American series, each week, the 11 cast members – made up of up-and-coming faces, some of whom you might recognise from comedy, acting or their social media pages – will be appearing on the live variety show alongside a different celebrity guest host.

Who is on the cast of Saturday Night Live UK?

Advertisement

The full cast list – who’ll be delivering the new tagline “live from London, it’s Saturday night” each week – is as follows:

  • Al Nash
  • Ania Magliano
  • Annabel Marlow
  • Ayoade Bamgboye
  • Celeste Dring
  • Emma Sidi
  • George Fouracres
  • Hammed Animashaun
  • Jack Shep
  • Larry Dean
  • Paddy Young

Lead producer James Longman enthused: “The UK is absolutely packed with incredible comedy talent right now and this cast represents the freshest voices we have, they’re bold, exciting and of course, incredibly funny.

“The chemistry between them is something special and we can’t wait to share this funny group of people with the world.”

The full cast of Saturday Night Live UK
The full cast of Saturday Night Live UK

Charlotte Rutherford/Sky UK

Meanwhile, more information on the show’s writing team will be announced in due course.

When does Saturday Night Live UK launch?

Advertisement

Saturday Night Live UK will film in London and air live on Sky, as well as being made available to stream on Now.

The UK version will feature the show’s staple topical monologue, a variety of comedy sketches, musical performances and a British twist on the popular Weekend Update satirical news segment, running for six weeks beginning on Saturday 21 March.

More information on upcoming guest hosts and musical guests will be announced closer to SNL UK’s launch next month.

Last week, the US version of SNL aired its milestone 1000th episode with guest host Alexander Skarsgård and musical performer Cardi B.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Ripped After Bragging He ‘Won A Lot Of Money’ From Taxpayers

Published

on

Trump Ripped After Bragging He 'Won A Lot Of Money' From Taxpayers

Donald Trump has claimed that at least one of his lawsuits against the US government was “essentially” over ― and he won.

NBC’s Tom Llamas asked the president about the $10 billion lawsuit against the Inland Revenue Service and Treasury Department that he filed last week.

“You can’t leak documents. And any money that I win, I’ll give it to charity, 100% to charities, charities that will be approved by government or whatever,” Trump said.

Trump filed the suit because a former IRS contractor leaked his tax returns to The New York Times and ProPublica during his first term, violating IRS confidentiality rules. Those returns showed that Trump, a billionaire with a massive real estate portfolio and other ventures, paid little to no federal income tax in a number of years.

Advertisement

Trump also spoke about another lawsuit he filed demanding $230 million from taxpayers for, among other things, the FBI’s search of his Mar-a-Lago home in 2022, where agents found classified documents.

“Essentially, the lawsuit’s been won,” Trump told Llamas. “I guess I won a lot of money.”

It’s not clear which lawsuit, specifically, he was referring to. However, both of them were against executive branch agencies, which he leads ― and he’s already said that means he can “work out a settlement with myself.”

Trump told Llamas that he would give the money he “won” in his lawsuit to charities such as the American Cancer Society, but the president’s critics don’t find that promise to be reassuring, given his history with nonprofits.

Advertisement

In 2018, the Trump Foundation shut down under judicial supervision amid allegations of self-dealing. He was later ordered to pay $2 million to settle a civil lawsuit brought by the state of New York against the charity.

Former New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said the charity had engaged in a “shocking pattern” of “repeated and willful self-dealing.” One example: buying a $10,000 portrait of Trump to hang at one of his golf courses.

The president’s critics responded on X:

Stealing taxpayer money to gift to causes of his choosing.

— Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) February 5, 2026

Advertisement

Trump is stealing $10 billion from taxpayers.

He’s inventing a lawsuit against his own administration for an absurd amount of money, then having them settle with him.

If you don’t understand this is a scam, then you’re not paying attention. https://t.co/rTfsuYfEpv

— Melanie D’Arrigo (@DarrigoMelanie) February 5, 2026

0% chance that Trump is giving ANY $$ to charity.

It’s a lie like all his other lies

Advertisement

He stole $10 billion US under a bogus lawsuit premise and is keeping it all

He doesn’t give to charities (his leaked taxes show this)
He’s not a Christian, a do gooder or a philanthropist https://t.co/Ytp26V1768

— West LA Résistance 🌊🇺🇸⚖️🗽 (@45bestwords) February 5, 2026

Let’s be clear about what this is: Trump is essentially planning to take $10 Billion from the American taxpayer and funnel it to himself.

Remember the Trump Foundation? His track record of making good on his promise to charities isn’t good. https://t.co/0c4zee8v34

Advertisement

— Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) February 5, 2026

Has it been “won” ? Who decided this case? Has Trump taken $10B ?? Which “charities” is he planning to donate it to? https://t.co/P6Kr8gHnyV

— David Clinch (@DavidClinchNews) February 5, 2026

No. The $10 billion isn’t “for charity.” It’s for Trump. He is stealing taxpayer money, smirking through it, and daring anyone to stop him. 😈 https://t.co/RA9HoBBD73

— Bucky (@BuckyNoseBest) February 5, 2026

Never forget when Donald Trump sued the government for $10 billion and then brokered his own settlement to himself. https://t.co/eLBtWkJO9a

— Andrew MacKenzie (@andrewmackenzie) February 5, 2026

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025