Politics

Resistance forces Israel into 10-day ceasefire but much remains unclear in Lebanon

Published

on

Israel has agreed to a 10-day ceasefire in Lebanon, theoretically halting its war of aggression in the south. But we know Israeli ceasefires generally involved quire a lot of firing. And much is unclear about the parameters of the pause, which do not appear to demand Israeli withdrawal.

Al Jazeera reported:

Israel and Lebanon have agreed to a 10-day ceasefire starting at 21:00 GMT today, US President Donald Trump says after speaking to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.

However, Hezbollah officials have said the terms of the ceasefire must see Israeli troops removed:

Hezbollah has said the continued presence of Israeli troops on Lebanese territory gives Lebanon and its people “the right to resist”, as it outlined its position on a proposed ceasefire.

In its first public response to the truce, the group said any agreement must not allow Israeli forces freedom of movement inside Lebanon.

Advertisement

Lebanon beseiged

Despite the ceasefire the Lebanese army is telling the millions displaced from the south not to return home:

Advertisement

And Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf insisted any peace deal must include Lebanon:

Lebanon is an integral part of the comprehensive ceasefire.

Pakistan, which is brokering the deal, sent army chief Asim Munir to Tehran to negotiate. He reportedly said:

I understand the importance of the ceasefire in Lebanon and I will follow it.

Nobody trusts Israel

Cradle Media columnist Mohamad Sweidan explained some of the complexities of the situation on X on 16 April:

According to the information:

– There are Pakistani confirmations to Tehran that Tel Aviv will soon announce a ceasefire in Lebanon.

Advertisement

– If Tel Aviv is telling the truth, this comes after Iran’s insistence on not participating in any round of negotiations before a ceasefire in Lebanon.

– Over the past two days, the Lebanon file has been the focus of Iranian-Pakistani discussions.

– Naturally, the extent of “Israel’s” commitment cannot be trusted, but what is certain is Tehran’s position seeking to stop the war.

Adding that:

Advertisement

In a little while, we will publish all the details of the Iranian-American negotiations on the subject.

Even as the peace deal was being thrashed out, Israel took the chance to bomb the last bridge over the Litani river – a strategically important feature the settler-colonial forces had planned to use as a cordon for the time being:

Advertisement

Mohamad Sweidan pointed to some of the “constants” to keep in mind in regard to the ceasefire:

Advertisement

For example:

Trump is seeking to close the file on the war with Iran and push towards the success of the negotiating track. In return, the Iranians are insisting on the necessity of “Israel” committing to the ceasefire and implementing it in practice before completing the negotiations, which has prompted Trump to exert direct pressure on Netanyahu to force him to accept it.

Sweidan also said the resistance had been central to forcing a deal:

If Tel Aviv accepts the ceasefire, it will be due to the steadfastness of the resistance fighters on the front and the steadfastness of the Iranian negotiators in their position.

And he emphasised that the current deal meant a pause – not a withdrawal:

And naturally, even if Tel Aviv announces its commitment, we should not trust it.

The full text of the ceasefire has now been published by the US State Department:

Advertisement

Advertisement

As the Canary reported on 16 April, Israeli forces have demolishing 1400 homes in south Lebanon. This is in line with their explicitly genocidal scorched earth Dayiha doctrine. And as we argued in the same article, Israel’s ambitions to colonise Lebanon are unlikely to have dimmed.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Advertisement

Source link

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Trending

Exit mobile version