Connect with us

Politics

The House Article | Community Health is driving economic resilience in Winchester

Published

on

Community Health is driving economic resilience in Winchester
Community Health is driving economic resilience in Winchester


3 min read

Healthcare is nearly always discussed as a cost upon society. A cost which we must pay for by extracting the hard-earned income of the people and businesses of Britain.

Advertisement

A luxury we can only afford to improve if we achieve economic growth. A service for which we must make so-called “tough choices” and perhaps cut to make it more affordable.

I believe that this way of thinking is entirely back-to-front. Far from being a national luxury only afforded to a growing economy, our community mental health and social care services are key investments that create the very growth this government claims to seek. Paying to keep our people healthy is what saves us from the much greater costs of a society without quality healthcare for all.

When people get ill and need hospital treatment, we rightly focus on the personal impact that has on them and their family and the medical care they receive. But that can mean we overlook the impact on the wider community and the economy. When people become unwell over the long term, that means they can fall out of the workforce, they can struggle to pay bills, rent or their mortgage. They may come to rely on family members or state support to get by. It may have a knock-on effect and require families to reduce their hours or leave paid employment in order to provide care work to their loved one.

Advertisement

Without adequate support, what might have been a small or short-term financial difficulty for a family can escalate into major economic harm.

In Winchester, we’ve seen how much difference it makes when we join the dots properly. At Melbury Lodge, our local mental health hospital run by Hampshire & Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, staff work in partnership with Citizens Advice Winchester District to help inpatients manage their finances and practical affairs while they’re still in hospital. That means when someone is finally well enough to be discharged, they don’t go home to a pile of unopened bills, eviction notices or court letters they were in no state to deal with.

The project has now helped around 600 people across Hampshire, preparing them for life in the community, free from the stressors that had been impacting their mental health. The main advice areas were around finance and housing, but the holistic service provided by Citizens Advice meant people could address a wide range of issues affecting their lives.

The research on this project found that for every £1 spent, around £14 was saved for the hospital Trust largely from shorter lengths of stay, fewer readmissions, reduced medication and better engagement in community services. With this incredible return on investment, a service like this should stop being thought of as a luxury that would be unaffordable to fund publicly. It’s smart, evidence-driven policy that also treats people like human beings – and provides good value for public finances.

Advertisement

This government has been desperate to find economic growth under the difficult economic circumstances left to them by the Conservatives – limiting their ability to spend or borrow.

That’s why I believe we need to boost ‘Spend to Save’ solutions just like this, which both generate a strong economic return for the economy and do so while following a more affordable cost path than the alternative of allowing people to fall further into debt and economic hardship.

Debt and in-work poverty ruins lives. It saps the joy from life, puts strain on relationships, and contributes towards our growing economic and mental health crises. But by supporting initiatives like this across the country, we can begin to tackle both crises together.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Oscars 2026: Full Winners List At This Year’s Academy Winners

Published

on

Oscars 2026: Full Winners List At This Year's Academy Winners

Oscars history was made earlier this year, when Sinners became the most-nominated film since the awards show first got going almost a century ago.

Ryan Coogler’s game-changing musical vampire drama scooped 18 nominations in total, ahead of One Battle After Another’s 14 nods.

Film fans will finally find out which movie will come out on top on Sunday night, as the Academy Awards are held in California, with Hamnet, Marty Supreme, Frankenstein, Bugonia and yes even KPop Demon Hunters among the other movies to score multiple nominations.

Advertisement

Who were the winners of the top awards at the 2026 Oscars?

The full list of winners from the 2026 Academy Awards is as follows – and make sure you keep checking back over the course of the night, as we’ll be updating our list as more are announced over the course of the night…

The Girl Who Cried Pearls

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Oscars 2026: Amy Madigan In Weapons And 13 More Award-Worthy Horror Roles

Published

on

Oscars 2026: Amy Madigan In Weapons And 13 More Award-Worthy Horror Roles

Amy Madigan has gone and done the unthinkable – and actually won an Oscar for a horror movie performance.

The veteran actor well and truly stole the show in the 2025 horror film Weapons, creating an iconic and deeply sinister character in Aunt Gladys and inspiring no end of Halloween costumes in the process.

Following an awards season that’s seen Best Supporting Actress prizes going out in a variety of directions, Amy came out on top during Sunday night’s Oscars – joining a rare group of actors including Anthony Hopkins, Ruth Gordon and Kathy Bates who’ve picked up Academy Awards for their horror characters.

In the past, the Academy has been notoriously reluctant to recognise horror performances, with many undeservedly losing out on the night – and others failing to secure a nomination at all.

Advertisement

As we celebrate Amy’s success, here are 13 more performances that deserved more love from the Oscars…

Demi Moore (The Substance)

From the moment we first heard about Demi Moore’s performance in the graphic body horror The Substance, we were already intrigued, and when it finally hit cinemas last year, we couldn’t shout loud enough about how good she was in it.

Over 2025′s awards season, Demi won a Golden Globe, Actor Award and Critics’ Choice Award for her work in The Substance, before finally securing her first Oscar nomination more than 40 years into her career.

In the end, Demi’s work wound up being added to the long list of incredible performances that deserved an Oscar only to miss out – but there’s no question that her nomination marked a huge win for horror recognition at the Oscars.

Advertisement

Toni Collette (Hereditary)

This is the Oscars snub that horror fans will be banging on about for eternity – and with good reason.

Ari Aster’s first ever feature film Hereditary takes you on a truly wild ride (we’re still recovering from it seven years later, to be honest with you), and at the centre of it all is Toni Collette’s unbelievable performance.

With her role as tortured matriarch Annie Graham, she brings the deeply unsettling story to life, and showcases her unparalleled versatility as an actor with a performance that takes her character through every emotion under the sun, from unsettled to heartbroken to terrified to furious. And let’s not even talk about that iconic dinner party scene.

Frankly, Toni has been snubbed at the Oscars too many times to count at this point – but it’s interesting that her only nomination to date was actually for her performance in a horror film, when she was recognised for her work in The Sixth Sense.

Advertisement

Shelley Duvall and Jack Nicholson (The Shining)

Warner Bros/Hawk Films/Kobal/Shutterstock

Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall’s work in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining might now be widely considered two of the finest and most unnerving performances in horror history, but they weren’t so well-received at the time.

Though the reception to the Stephen King adaptation grew warmer as the years went on, critics were pretty lukewarm on it at the time, with Shelley even earning a Worst Actress nomination at the Razzies following its release.

In 2022, this was finally rescinded by the Razzies, who apologised publicly to Shelley Duvall, after learning of director Kubrick’s alleged treatment towards her on set.

Advertisement

Anthony Perkins (Psycho)

There are a few things we think of when someone mentions Psycho. Those infamous high-pitched strings during the iconic shower sequence. The image of the Bates Motel looming in the distance. And, of course, Anthony Perkins’ unsettling portrayal of serial killer Norman Bates.

While Psycho itself was nominated for a string of Oscars the year after its release – including an acting nod for Janet Leigh and Best Director recognition for Alfred Hitchcock – curiously, Anthony Perkins did not make the shortlist for his work in Psycho, despite his portrayal of the slowly unravelling Norman Bates playing such a part in what makes the movie so gripping.

Daniel Kaluuya (Get Out)

Daniel Kaluuya managed a rare feat for the lead in a horror film in 2017 and actually got nominated for an Oscar, which is a testament to the strength of both his performance and the strength of Get Out in general.

But despite getting awards love from the Golden Globes, Baftas, SAG Awards and Academy Awards, none of these translated to a win.

Advertisement

Absolutely no offence to Gary Oldman, or his performance as Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour, but as the years go on, it’s becoming clearer which performance is most likely to stand the test of time…

Daniel did eventually pick up an Oscar of his own just three years later, though, thanks to his work in Judas And The Black Messiah.

Sissy Spacek (Carrie)

United Artists/Kobal/Shutterstock

Like Daniel, both Sissy Spacek and her on-screen mum Piper Laurie were both nominated for Oscars for their work in the horror classic Carrie.

Advertisement

Neither of their nominations transferred into a win, but there’s no denying that with her performance, Sissy created an iconic movie character for the ages that we’re still talking about 50 years after the film’s original release.

Florence Pugh (Midsommar)

We’ve already touched on Toni Collette’s much-lauded performance in Hereditary, but there’s another female lead in an Ari Aster project that deserves to be shouted about, too.

In fact, Florence Pugh’s Midsommar performance could well be considered the “yin” to Toni in Hereditary’s “yang”. Both films centre around women who suffer traumatic life events, and struggle to cope as the world around them becomes increasingly more unsettling, although while the latter is shrouded in darkness and shadow, the former takes place in broad sunshine, making the unfolding horror all the more jarring.

The year after Midsommar, Florence did score an Oscar nomination for her performance in Greta Gerwig’s Little Women, which probably scuppered her chances of a Best Actress nod for the horror film, which is a bit of a shame, as her emotionally-charged work in Ari Aster’s film was every bit as deserving, if not more.

Advertisement

Mia Farrow (Rosemary’s Baby)

HAHA/Cinema Publishers/The Hollywood/Shutterstock

Often cited as one of the best horror films of all time, Rosemary’s Baby landed two Oscar nominations following its release, including a Best Supporting Actress win for Ruth Gordon.

But given everything she had to do in the title role, it feels a little surprising in the present day that the Academy would go as far as celebrating Rosemary’s Baby back in 1969, without actually giving its leading star Mia Farrow a nomination.

Lupita Nyong’o (Us)

Advertisement
Lupita Nyong'o in Us
Lupita Nyong’o in Us

C Barius/Universal/ILM/Kobal/Shutterstock

By the time Jordan Peele’s follow-up to Get Out came along, the world was ready for more from the Oscar-winning screenwriter, particularly as Oscar winner Lupita Nyong’o was on double duty playing two halves of the same whole.

Now, we appreciate that audiences and critics didn’t quite take to Us in the same way they did to Get Out, but we stand by it being an excellent film, and for everything Lupita was able to do with two completely opposing characters, we still think it’s a shame she never secured her second Oscar nomination for it.

Interestingly, her peers in the Screen Actors’ Guild did nominate for her performance that year, though the Best Actress title would ultimately end up going to Renée Zellweger for Judy, as did the Oscar.

Hugh Grant (Heretic)

Advertisement

Say what you want about Heretic (to be honest, we still think of it as one of our biggest cinema disappointments of 2024, after a trailer that promised so much), but there’s no arguing with Hugh Grant’s transformative performance as the chilling Mr Reed, putting his charm to work in ways we never saw in his many rom-coms of yore.

While Hugh did secure recognition at the Baftas and Golden Globes earlier this year, that Best Actor category was especially stacked in 2025, meaning plenty of deserving actors missed out on a place, including the former Love Actually star.

Jeff Goldblum (The Fly)

20th Century Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock

The Fly may have won an Oscar in the Best Makeup category back in 1987 (which, interestingly enough, was fellow sci-fi body horror The Substance’s only win in 2025), but its Saturn Award-winning lead performance from Jeff Goldblum did not transfer to an Oscar nomination.

We get it, a film about a half-man, half-fly was always going to be a hard sell to the Academy, but Jeff’s performance is still being talked about almost 40 years later.

Advertisement

Despite his expansive career, the Wicked star has, in fact, never been nominated for an Oscar for acting, although he was nominated as the director of the short film Little Surprises in the mid-1990s.

Tilda Swinton (Suspiria)

Tilda Swinton in Suspiria
Tilda Swinton in Suspiria

It’s been seven years, and we’re still not sure we understand exactly what went on in Luca Guadagnino’s remake of Suspiria. But what we do remember is that Tilda Swinton played about 20 different characters, disappearing into each role as flawlessly as you’d expect, and received absolutely zip the following awards season.

Despite four Golden Globe nods and three from the Baftas, Tilda has just one Oscar nomination to her name, which was the same year she won for Michael Clayton.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer Promises Aid To Working People During Iran Crisis

Published

on

Starmer Promises Aid To Working People During Iran Crisis

Keir Starmer will promise to support working people “whatever challenges lie ahead” amid rising economic pressure from the Iran war.

The government is facing pressure to step up and offer financial support to the general public while Donald Trump’s conflict with the Middle East continues to strain global oil supplies and rock international markets.

There are widespread fears that energy bills could skyrocket later in the year, affecting Britons’ cost of living.

“It’s moments like this that tell you what a government is about,” the prime minister is expected to say in a press conference on Monday.

Advertisement

“My answer is clear. Whatever challenges lie ahead, this government will always support working people.

“That is my first instinct – my first priority – to help you with the cost of living through this crisis.”

He will outline plans to help the public using heating oil to warm their homes.

The PM is expected to address concerns that suppliers are cancelling orders and increasing prices, too.

Advertisement

He is expected to say: “I will not tolerate companies trying to exploit this crisis to make money from working people.

“…if the companies have broken the law, there will be legal action.”

The government has also promised to work with international allies to try and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as Iran continues to block the major oil shipping lane.

The prime minister will say: “We will continue to work towards a swift resolution of the situation in the Middle East.

Advertisement

“Because there is no question that ending the war is the quickest way to reduce the cost of living.”

US president Donald Trump asked Britain and other allies to send warships to keep Hormuz open on Saturday.

The request was an unexpected U-turn from the president, who just last week claimed Starmer was “trying to join wars after we’re already won”.

He also claimed “we don’t need” British aircraft carriers in the region.

Advertisement

In response to Trump’s latest request, a Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “As we’ve said previously, we are currently discussing with our allies and partners a range of options to ensure the security of shipping in the region.”

On Sunday, energy secretary Ed Miliband was unable to say what the government thinks Trump’s war aims in the Middle East are.

He also distanced the UK from Trump’s decision to ease sanctions on Russia in a bid to help the global oil trade.

“We’ve not lifted our sanctions against Russia because it is very, very important that we continue to show solidarity with the Ukrainian people,” Miliband said.

Advertisement

“This was an illegal invasion launched more than four years ago. Our solidarity with the Ukrainian people has been incredibly important throughout these four years.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Oscars Red Carpet 2026: All The Celebrity Photos You Need To See

Published

on

Oscars Red Carpet 2026: All The Celebrity Photos You Need To See

After an especially jam-packed awards season that began way back in January, the biggest night in the Hollywood calendar has now arrived.

Yes, folks, it’s Oscars time.

Each year the Academy Awards affords the film industry the opportunity to recognise the biggest achievements of the last 12 months – but let’s face it, for many of us, the annual event is more about the red carpet than anything else.

Advertisement

And if that’s the category you fall into, you’ll be pleased to hear that between the nominees, presenters, performers and other famous guests who managed to sneak their way onto the guestlist, this year’s Oscars has proved to be as star-studded as ever.

Here are all the A-list photos you need to see from the 2026 Oscars red carpet – and make sure you keep checking back because we’ll be updating our round-up as more famous guests make their grand entrances…

Jessie Buckley

Nominated – Best Actress

Advertisement

Chase Infiniti

Rose Byrne

Nominated – Best Actress

Hudson Williams

Renate Reinsve

Nominated – Best Actress

Wagner Moura

Wagner Moura arrives at the Oscars on Sunday, March 15, 2026, at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles. (Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP)
Wagner Moura arrives at the Oscars on Sunday, March 15, 2026, at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles. (Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP)

Kieran Culkin

Felicity Jones

Jacobi Jupe

Alicia Silverstone

Heidi Klum

Charithra Chandran

Bella Thorne

Amelia Dimoldenberg

Shaboozey

Isabela Merced

Catherine and Brandi Carlile

Yvette Nicole Brown

Barbie Ferreira

Vicky Krieps

Ruth E Carter

Nominated – Best Costume Design

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

An Evening with Lord Ashcroft (And Elton John. Oh, and

Published

on

 

Dear all,

So there I was, catching snippets of the West Ham v Manchester City match on my phone, while also watching Kemi Badenoch and Theresa May strutting their funky stuff to a live performance by Nicole Scherzinger, followed by Rory Bremner playing Bruce Forsyth in PLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHT, ably assisted by Holly Willoughby. Could my life get any weirder?

The occasion was Lord Ashcroft’s eightieth birthday bash at the Grosvenor House hotel on London’s Park Lane. What an evening it turned out to be. I had been to three of these events before and the one thing I knew was to expect the unexpected. In previous years the cabaret live entertainment had included Kylie Minogue, the Jersey Boys, Lionel Ritchie., Michael Buble, Lulu, Cliff Richard, Denise Van Outen, Jasper Carrott, the Band of the Scots Guards, Tom Jones. I have a particular memory of being on the dance floor, boogying away to Kylie, when…. on second thoughts, you’ll have to wait for my autobiography for that particular juicy anecdote! Only a few months to wait!

Advertisement

I got up yesterday feeling terrible, and full of cold. But there was no way I was going to miss an Ashcroft party. So mid-afternoon on went the dinner suit, which for the first time was quite loose fitting. My friend Dan and his wife Laura were going to see COME ALIVE in Earls Court, so they drove me to the Grosvenor House and collected me afterwards. Here are Laura and I dressed up to the nines!

 

 

At the pre-dinner drinks reception I had some nice chats with various Tory luminaries including Sajid and Laura Javid, James and Susie Cleverly, Mark Francois and Mark Wallace who now runs Total Politics and Biteback. And then Liz Truss and her husband Hugh appeared, and we had a very entertaining exchange for quite some time. She was very relaxed and funny and declared I wasn’t right wing enough to appear on her Youtube show, and then tested me on my ‘soundness’. And with that we all trooped into the ballroom to sit down for dinner.

Advertisement

I was sitting far nearer the stage than on previous occasions, with Mark Wallace’s wife Isabella and Caroline Craig (wife of Sky News chief political correspondent, Jon) sitting either side of me. I first met Caroline back in 1985 when I was working in Parliament and she was working for Norfolk MP Richard Ryder. People tried to match us off. How different our lives might have been! She now runs Nigel Farage’s Westminster office and remains an absolute hoot.

Rory Bremner compered the whole evening and did a superb job, littered with impressions old and new. He does a brilliant takeoff of Donald Trump and was a master at judging how far he could push the audience’s boundaries. The highlight was a Peter O’Sullivan commentary of the first eighteen months of Labour in government. Political satire at its best.

Before the meal, Rory introduced the first, which we all assumed was a Queen tribute act, until an AI version of Michael Ashcroft appeared on screen singing ‘Don’t Stop Me Know’. It was a bit like the Abba Voyage holograms.

After the starter, we were entertained by a brilliant Ukrainian choir, who Michael has got to know, and help fund, on his various trips to Ukraine. They were then joined on stage by Katherine Jenkins. When the choir performed their first song, there wasn’t a dry eye in the house.

Advertisement

Next up was an audience participation game of ‘Play Your Cards Right’, with Rory Bremner becoming Bruce Forsyth with Holly Willoughby playing the role of glamorous assistant. You had to be there… She has some great comic timing.

After the main course, Nicole Scherzinger performed four songs including ‘Diamonds are Forever, a song from ‘Sunset Boulevard’ and the Pussycat Dolls classic ‘Don’t Cha’. Three tables over from me, I spied Kemi Badenoch on her feet dancing away, and two tables being me, Theresa May was also really giving it some! Kemi later told me the song was one of her favourites when she was at university, so she immediately leapt to her feet. Nigel Farage, who was on the same table, stayed resolutely in his seat!

A highlight of these events has always been a speech by William Hague, and again he lived up to expectations. He was followed by Michael himself, who was clearly quite moved by the occasion. He was also very funny, but had three important things to tell the audience. Firstly, that he had just been awarded the Ukraine Order of Merit for all his work supporting the cause of Ukrainian freedom. He worse the medal around his neck the whole evening. His support for various Ukrainian charities, both military and civilian, has helped thousands of Ukrainians survive the hell of the last four years. Indeed, the audience were urged to donate to Olena Zelenska’s Cayo Foundation, which distributes monies to charities all over Ukraine.

Michael went on to announced that General Keith Kellog would be publishing his book with Biteback, but left the best to last. Last year the Imperial War Museum announced that after 15 years, it would be closing the Lord Ashcroft Gallery, which has been displaying his unique collection of Victoria and George Crosses. Frankly, it was an outrageous decision by the IWM and made for the most woke of reasons – the collection wasn’t ‘diverse’ enough, and they wanted to use the space for things other than honouring bravery. Idiots. Anyway. last night Michael announced that the collection had found a new home – at the National Army Museum in Chelsea. The audience roared their approval.

Advertisement

After his speech there was a series of happy birthday video messages including from Olena Zelenska, General Kellogg, Scott Morrison, Stephen Harper and Tony Abbott, as well as a number of Ukrainian MPs including my friend Oleksei Gonchorenko.

And then it was time for us all to speculate on who the final act of the evening might be. When the curtain went back the shock throughout the ballroom was palpable. It was Sir Elton John! There. Live, a few feet from us. Yet another audience roar ensued, as the opening bars of SATURDAY NIGHT rang out. He is a master entertainer and we were all spellbound, as he sang Tiny Dancer, Benny and the Jets, Goodbye Yellow Brick Road, I Guess That’s Why They Call It The Blues, Candle in the Wind, and several more.

What a night. It was a truly unique experience, and I was honoured to have been invited.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jordan has detained a political activist with no explanation, again

Published

on

Jordan has detained a political activist with no explanation, again

Omar Awad — a member of the political bureau of the Communist Party in Jordan  — was arrested on 8 March 2026 after being snatched from the streets by security forces. Since then, he has been denied contact with both his family and his lawyers.

No warrant was presented, no formal charges have been announced. Authorities have provided no explanation for his detention.

The arrest comes as a shock for those who know Awad.

Jordan detains Omar Awad

A trained dentist, Awad first became known during his years as a student at a dental college in Ukraine. Even then, he stood out for his organising work among students. Colleagues recall a young activist who combined political conviction with an ability to build relationships across movements.

Advertisement

When he returned to Jordan after graduating, Awad brought the same energy with him. He quickly became active within the party’s youth sector, helping to organise political activity and grassroots campaigns. Over time, he rose through the ranks — first to the party’s Central Committee and eventually to its Political Bureau.

Those who have worked alongside him describe a leader who was both firm and approachable: someone capable of commanding respect while remaining deeply attentive to the people around him.

It is precisely this kind of political engagement that often attracts the attention of Jordan’s powerful security apparatus.

Jordan has long presented itself internationally as a stable ally of Western powers in a volatile region. But that stability has often relied on tight political control at home. Activists, journalists, and opposition figures have repeatedly faced detention, prosecution, and surveillance.

Advertisement

Such arrests are not isolated incidents. They form part of a broader pattern in which dissenting voices — particularly those critical of regional power structures or supportive of resistance movements — are treated as threats to state authority.

The detention of Awad appears to follow the same pattern.

Across the region, political repression has frequently accompanied geopolitical alignment with powerful Western allies. Governments that position themselves as pillars of “stability” often rely on security services to suppress political mobilisation that challenges the status quo.

And to be frank, it is getting wearying.

Advertisement

This is a fight no government can win

For Jordan’s ruling establishment, the arrest of a communist political leader may therefore be less about an individual activist and more about sending a message.

That message is: organised political opposition will not be tolerated.

Yet history shows that repression rarely silences movements for long. From anti-colonial struggles across the Arab world to labour and student movements in Jordan itself, political change has often been driven by individuals who refused to accept the limits imposed on them.

Omar Awad is known precisely for that kind of commitment — to social justice, political freedom and resistance against occupation.

Advertisement

One more time: if the authorities in Jordan think that they can separate us and hunt political activists down one by one, we at the Canary will use our platform and all the privilege afforded to us as a media organisation based in Britain to make sure this doesn’t happen.

We will be relentless. We will make sure that the state of Jordan’s repression does not go unnoticed in the West. Nothing can stand in the face of international solidarity. Just ask your mates west of the river.

Power and solidarity to Omar Awad.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Film helps to declassify government records of UK nuclear test vets

Published

on

Film helps to declassify government records of UK nuclear test vets

An experienced cinematographer’s directorial debut has been part of a campaign to declassify government blood records of nuclear test veterans. Previously held under the highest levels of security clearance, those records are now being released to veterans’ families for the first time, with the full archive scheduled to be made publicly accessible through The National Archives later this year.

Recognition for nuclear test veterans

Alan Owen is co-founder of LABRATS International and former chairman of the British Nuclear Test Veterans Association. Daniel Everitt-Lock’s film Our Planet, The People, My Blood follows Owen as he leads a landmark legal battle seeking recognition and compensation for the millions of people affected by nuclear weapons testing programs worldwide.

Check out the trailer:

Advertisement

Making the film took three years and 150,000km of travel by director Everitt-Lock and co-producer Rodrigo Borda. Journeying across four continents, they captured over 50 first-hand testimonies. These included people from Indigenous Marshallese communities (Marshall Islands), the Maralinga Tjarutja of Australia, the Spokane Nation of the United States and survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Everitt-Lock says:

Nine years ago, I watched a short film about nuclear test veterans and couldn’t believe that no one was talking about it. I set out to make a documentary that offered a deeply human account of the communities forgotten by the governments that harmed them.

Owen, from LABRATS International, comments:

This documentary shows the years of denial from one of the oldest establishments in the UK and across the world. The affected communities now have a voice through this incredible piece of work. My family’s story is just one of thousands which has been suppressed, it can now be heard.

The film premiered at the Prince Charles Cinema, Leicester Square, London, on 12 March. Following the world premiere, the feature documentary will have screenings in cinemas across the UK. Venues include London, Liverpool, Manchester, Birmingham and Brighton.

Advertisement

Everitt-Lock, adds:

I’m thrilled to share this story with the world as we continue to change the political agenda and fight for long-deserved justice for millions of victims and their families.

Details of other screening dates and tickets across the UK will appear here.

Everitt-Lock is a London-based director and cinematographer with a decade of professional credits across film and television. As a cinematographer, his work spans productions for Amazon, HBO, and the BBC across more than a dozen feature films and multiple television series.

Our Planet, The People, My Blood is his feature documentary debut. Since completion, it’s had endorsements from Nobel Peace Prize-winning International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), CND and UN House Scotland. A Parliamentary screening in January 2026 secured cross-party political support. Jambika Docs has acquired Our Planet, The People, My Blood for international distribution.

Advertisement

Featured image via True Perspective Films

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Settlers attack village in West Bank

Published

on

Settlers attack village in West Bank

On the evening of 10 March, masked Israeli colonial settlers carried out a violent attack in the village of Hamamat al Malih, in the Northern Jordan Valley.

They came back presumably to kidnap the residents

Journalist and human rights activist Andrey Khrzhanovskiy, better known as Andrey X, arrived in the village to find 70-year-old resident Abu Raed severely beaten and struggling to stand. Two hours earlier, settlers had stormed the place and found Abu Raed alone. So they viciously attacked him, then left the area. Abu Raed, like most of the Palestinians living there, has also previously been attacked by settlers. Just two nights before this attack, they also smashed the windows of his home and completely destroyed its contents.

The settlers returned, while Andrey X was still in the village. Armed with knives, sticks and rocks, they smashed the activists’ car, slashed all four tyres, and then chased them.

Andrey X, Abu Raed, and a 70-year-old solidarity activist, barricaded themselves in a house, but the settlers broke down the door and repeatedly attacked all three of them. Andrey X says he was thrown to the ground, then beaten and kicked in the face and head. He believes the settlers had other intentions when they returned to the village.

Advertisement

When they broke into the house and started attacking us, they had plastic zip ties in their hands, literally ready to use. My assumption is that they were planning  to kidnap the Palestinians. They saw there were no activists in the village two hours before, so they came back presumably to kidnap the residents. But I’m assuming that because we were there, they decided to just attack us instead.

Israeli occupation police claim, as always, there is no evidence the settlers have done anything wrong

The settlers then left the area, but not before taking Andrey X’s phone to ensure there would be no evidence of their attack. But shortly afterward, at around the same time as the police, they returned again, this time unmasked, and in different clothing. Unsurprisingly, the ‘Israeli’ occupation police did nothing, and said there was no evidence that the settlers carried out the attack. An Israeli ambulance also arrived, and at first refused to treat Abu Raed, saying “he is an Arab, what can we do.” Eventually it took him away, and transferred him to a Palestinian ambulance.

Settlers

Settlers

There is a military base next to the village and an outpost three kilometres away, to the north. According to Andrey X, that is where the settlers come from every day, to terrorise not only the residents of Hamamat al Malih, but also other nearby villages. While settlers in the Jordan Valley have historically been less physically violent towards Palestinians than in places such as Masafer Yatta, or East Ramallah, this is no longer true.

He says:

This changed instantly when the war with Iran started. There are now daily pogroms, with beatings and hospitalisation. They’ve been escalating their violence further and further, since the election of the current government. So when they see they can get away with more, then they escalate even further. Our activist colleagues who have infiltrated settler group chats say they’re openly saying to each other that now everyone’s distracted, this is their chance. They say they need to escalate and take as much as possible, while all attention is on the war with Iran.

Andrey X tells us that daily attacks occurred in Hamamat al Malih in the week leading up to this attack. And the day before, settlers had destroyed CCTV cameras, solar panels and windows in the village. He says it is no longer safe for Palestinians to stay there if there are no activists, or only a few residents present. The women, children, and livestock have already gone, because of the sustained violent attacks.

Advertisement

Commander of IOF Jordan Valley Brigade to Palestinians: ‘It’s better for you to leave than for us to expel you’

With their growing confidence, brought about by the inaction of the international community, attacks by these zionist colonisers have dramatically increased, and become more violent. According to a new report from 13 March, by the Colonisation and Wall Resistance Commission, settlers carried out 192 attacks during just the last two weeks of the Israel-US war on Iran. These actions are encouraged by the occupation. On 8 March, Gilad Shriki, Commander of the Jordan Valley division of the Israeli occupation forces (IOF), went to every remaining community in Area C of the Jordan Valley.

He threatened them, saying:

This is Area C, a military area, so you have to get out of here. It’s better for you to leave than for us to expel you.

More than 60 percent of the West Bank is in Area C. This means it is under complete “Israeli” control. The occupation is currently carrying out a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Palestinians living in this area. This includes those living in the Jordan Valley, 90 percent of which is in Area C.

These illegal settlers are aided and protected by the IOF, and armed by the Israeli occupation government. They work together for the benefit of the Jewish supremacist state of Israel, with the aim of ethnically cleansing the occupied Palestinian territory of all Palestinians. Not a day goes by that a Palestinian family is not displaced, a Palestinian home is not set alight or a Palestinian is not seriously injured or even killed. The forcible transfer of residents of an occupied territory is a war crime under international law. It is time the inaction of the international community came to an end, and the Israeli occupation is held to account for its countless crimes against Palestinians.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Canary catch up: momtok, manosphere and good old BBC homophobia

Published

on

bbc

bbc

Welcome back to Canary catch-up, your weekly natter about the most talked-about TV of the week. This week in between copious amounts of TV, I’ve also been enjoying some live music. Last Sunday, I saw Lily Allen perform her full West End Girl album, which was incredible, raw, feminine rage. It was also topped off by her opener, the Dallas Minor Trio performing her hits on strings. With all that’s going on in the world, I can’t tell you how much I needed to shout along to a classical version of Fuck You.

Anyway, on with what I’ve been watching!

Can Dadtok survive this? I fucking hope not

My guilty pleasure show, The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, is back! Make no mistake, TSLOMW is utter fucking trash, I know it, the producers know it, and Momtok knows it. There is nothing you can say that will convince me Layla isn’t a plant because that lass is just evil and not subtle. But I cannot get enough. This series, however, something gross has emerged – Dadtok.

“Oh I know what we need in this show about women breaking out of the patriarchal religious archetype, some sexist men!” said the producers, seemingly, because this series you cannot fucking get rid of these toxic men and their need for attention. Aside from this the other highlight of the series is Demi being desperate for clout but refusing to take any ownership by refusing to do interviews, so the producers decided to interview an empty chair. Which is even funnier when you realise the Wives are all executive producers now.

Advertisement

Louis Theroux’s ‘groundbreaking’ doc is old news for women

The internet has been abuzz this week over Louis Theroux’s new Netflix show Inside The Manosphere. The filmmaker delved into the murky world of male influencers who are all racist and massively misogynistic shitbags and exposed just how little they actually believe their own shit. But they portray themselves as wealthy with their pick of women, and young working-class boys look up to them.

The thing is, though, as bad as some of the shit in it was, it was nothing women didn’t already know. This is the shit we see and get thrown at us all the time. But it just didn’t go deep enough. As journalist Jess Davies pointed out, the show didn’t mention the patriarchy once. While much of the focus is on teenage boys, there’s also no mention of how teenage girls will have this harmful misogyny forced on them.

And that was where the show fell down for me. It didn’t do enough to address society, the media, and the government’s involvement.

The Walsh Sisters shines a light on family dynamics and addiction

I’ve been loving The Walsh Sisters on BBC iPlayer this week. The Irish family drama based on Marian Keyes’ books is a sharp look at family tensions and addiction. It’s the beauty and the brutal reality of adult sister relationships. They’re both your best friends and someone who knows exactly which button to press and when. Your co-conspirator with overbearing parents and the first one to slyly make a dig about you.

Advertisement

But all of this gets even more complicated when addiction is involved. When Rachel goes to rehab for her drug and alcohol addiction, some of her sisters are shocked. In particular, Claire, who questions her parents decision, mainly because she often drinks as much as Rachel, if not more. This was a common thing I got when I first got sober. Many were shocked as they drank more than me. But this really speaks to just how ingrained drinking culture is.

Good old BBC homophobia

The BBC announced this week that its flagship queer dating shows, I Kissed a Boy and I Kissed a Girl, had been axed. Hosted by Dannii Minogue, they were the first queer dating shows in the UK. but not anymore, apparently. The broadcaster said the decision was due to ‘funding challenges’:

Unfortunately, we have to make difficult choices in light of our funding challenges and there are no current plans for the show to return.

The BBC can blame funding all they want. But it’s interesting that of, all the shows they could’ve cut, they cut the only two specifically representing queer people and not Mrs Browns Boys isn’t it? After also airing racism, covering for genocide, and demonising benefit claimants recently, it looks like the BBC just got a full house.

Canary Catch Up will be taking a break next week as I’ll be flouncing about the Scottish Highlands, but join me back here on 28th for more telly talk

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour is manufacturing consent for digital ID

Published

on

Labour is manufacturing consent for digital ID

In the crass new Channel 4 show Handcuffed, hosted by Jonathan Ross, two strangers with wildly different lifestyles or views are manacled together. It invites us to wallow in the discomfort of two people who have nothing in common, and can’t get away from each other fast enough.

As political metaphors go, it’s quite brilliant. The public has found itself shackled to a Labour government it despises. Keir Starmer is the first prime minister in modern times to be met with hostile football chants. Labour now regularly polls fourth.

And the hostility is mutual: Labour holds the public in contempt, too. This is evident from small things, like the derisive messages posted in a private WhatsApp group by former MP Andrew Gwynne. ‘Dear resident, fuck your bins. I’m re-elected and without your vote. Screw you. PS: Hopefully you’ll have croaked it by the [local elections].’ Unsurprisingly, he resigned his seat after the messages were made public.

Advertisement

It’s even more evident in the big things, like ending inheritance tax relief for farmers, or imposing punitive expenses on pubs and small businesses, or its allergic reaction to displays of patriotism. While Labour wrapped itself in the Union Jack in the 2024 election, it now deems it a potential ‘tool of hate’ – at least according to its draft ‘social-cohesion strategy’, leaked earlier this month.

It’s most evident in all the ways Labour tries to avoid hearing from us. This week, the government finally launched a consultation into a national digital-ID scheme. This scheme entails a radical change in the relationship between the citizen and the state, and Labour’s attempt to introduce a single identifier – a plastic ID card – was scrapped in the face of huge public opposition in 2010. The fact that, this time around, Labour announced the policy first, before any consultation, is a bit of a giveaway. It doesn’t care what we think of it, as it’s going to do it anyway.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

But that’s only half of it. The consultation announcement this week introduces a novel proposal. This is a ‘People’s Panel on Digital ID’, described as ‘an in-depth deliberative engagement process with a broadly UK representative sample of 100 to 120 individuals to discuss the policy in detail. Individuals will be selected through sortition (civic lottery).’

There should be no mystery about what people think about digital ID. They have already spoken: last year, almost three million signed a petition opposing it, and MPs offices have been inundated with angry emails about it. So why continue?

Advertisement

The reason is that Labour believes that digital ID is so self-evidently good that any opposition must be wildly irrational. In November on spiked, I called digital ID an exercise in self-deception. Labour has convinced itself that it would be easy to develop and implement the scheme and that, soon, familiarity with it would overcome long-standing principled objections. Labour imagines that, aside from some noisy conspiracy theorists, who talk about the imminent imposition of social-credit systems or the end of anonymous cash transactions, the majority will soon see how brilliant a digital identity is.

But this dismisses many profound and rationally held concerns around the state imposing a unique digital identifier. This is not some fringe concern. As critics point out, it fundamentally changes the relationship we have with the state, turning us into a ‘papers, please’ society.

All this is before we get to the well-founded security fears, also documented here on spiked, over identity theft and fraud. Questions about the One Login system, designed to help citizens access government services online, have been raised in parliament after it was revealed that parts were developed in Romania – a known hotspot for cybercrime. Nothing here inspires trust.

Advertisement

But back to the so-called people’s panel. The idea that a tiny, selected subset of the public should be ventriloquised to speak on our behalf is disturbing. The idea of citizens’ assemblies has been applied to another unpopular, top-down set of ideas with which we must not disagree: climate mitigation. As Ben Pile wrote in 2020 and in 2021 on spiked, these are exercises in manufacturing consent.

Incredibly, the government is seeking to go even further in distancing itself from the public to which it finds itself manacled. It is reportedly attracted to the concept of synthetic focus groups, in which opinions are generated by AI chatbots. This is an idea championed by Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser. Indeed, Cummings’s favourite computer modeller, Ben Warner, has set up a new firm selling these machine-generated insights to marketing departments and political campaigns, called Electric Twin.

Its political appeal is tailor-made to a public that Labour finds mystifying. On its website, Electric Twin said: ‘Societies feel unknowable… leaders and teams are frequently blindsided’, although it removed the words after I drew attention to them in the Telegraph last year. Removing human feedback must be an attractive proposition for such an unpopular government.

Advertisement

Citizens assemblies, digital-ID workshops and synthetic focus groups are all an acknowledgement that top-down, unpopular ideas meet resistance from the public. But, such is the contempt of our elites, they want to sidestep us altogether.

‘Would it not be simpler if the government simply dissolved the people and elected another?’, asked Bertolt Brecht. Thanks to generative AI, the British government now thinks it can. But the real democratic reckoning on digital identity awaits. Labour won’t get off the hook that easily.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025