Connect with us

Politics

The House Opinion Article | Inside The Race To Mine The UK’s Critical Minerals

Published

on

Inside The Race To Mine The UK's Critical Minerals
Inside The Race To Mine The UK's Critical Minerals

Illustration: Tracy Worrall


10 min read

The UK has deposits of critical minerals but has stopped mining them. Sophie Church hears that, if we don’t take advantage of our assets, others are waiting

Advertisement

Cornish lads are fishermen, and Cornish lads are miners too. But when the fish and tin are gone what are the Cornish boys to do?

In 1994, Cornish shanty singer Roger Bryant wrote Cornish Boys, an ode to Cornwall’s dying mining industry. The price of tin was falling, and the mines that had supported Cornish communities for hundreds of years could not afford to stay open. Four years after Bryant wrote his shanty, the UK’s last remaining tin mine, South Crofty, closed. 

Yet pockets of critical minerals remain nestled across our Isles, from County Tyrone to the Highlands and down to Cornwall. The UK has some of the largest reserves of lithium in Europe, while Hemerdon Mine in Devon boasts the second-largest deposit of tungsten in the world. 

Advertisement

Used in many of the technologies we see today, from solar panels to mobile phones to jet engines, China has invested heavily in critical minerals and held prices low. China now produces more than 50 per cent of 17 of the top 27 critical mineral groups, and refines 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths. Xi Jinping’s ‘Belt and Road’ initiative has seen China control critical mineral extraction on five different continents.

South Crofty and other critical minerals mines around the world have been unable to compete. 

But as the world wakes up to its over-reliance on China for critical minerals, the UK is finally recognising its own value. In July, Rachel Reeves visited South Crofty, which has now reopened thanks to government funding. After speaking a few words in Cornish, in her hard hat and high-vis, the Chancellor went on to say that the £28.6m grant from the National Wealth Fund (NWF) could lead to the creation of 1,300 jobs. The team at South Crofty now hope to start commercial extraction of tin by mid-2028.

Advertisement

Chris understands the opportunity, but he also understands the requirement for investment in processing

In September, the NWF invested another £31m into Cornish Lithium alongside increased funding from Techmet, a critical minerals investor. Then-communities secretary Angela Rayner designated Cornish Lithium’s Trelavour Hard Rock plant a ‘Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project’. 

“It’s really hard to articulate this groundswell of hope that is coming back to communities that for decades have been deprived,” says Perran Moon, Labour’s MP for Camborne and Redruth. 

Advertisement

“We’re seeing record numbers of apprenticeships in some of our businesses. We’re seeing young people really engaging with geology. And we’re seeing our further education college maxed out in its number of construction workers and engineers.” 

The UK’s mining industry is also revelling in the government’s support.

“What projects internationally are competing for is capital, and that’s where, for instance, the NWF investment in Cornish Lithium – which was instrumental in attracting other funding from the private sector into the project – was so important,” says Mike King, business development and government relations vice president of Cornish Lithium.

Being made a ‘Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project’ helped “tremendously” in giving certainty to investors, King adds.

Advertisement

Strategic Minerals, which is exploring the Redmoor Tungsten-Tin-Copper project in Cornwall, has now unlocked over £750,000 in grant funding. The company matched this via its parent company to access a further £1.5m. 

“We’ve significantly increased our market cap through that positive news flow and showing how good a project we have here,” says Dennis Rowland, managing director at Cornwall Resources Limited, which is working on the project.

But financial support and photo opps for the Chancellor may be the simpler of government’s tasks. Now, all eyes are on its Critical Minerals Strategy (CMS), which, delayed since the spring, is expected to be published this month. 

Chris McDonald, industry minister in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (Desnz) and the Department for Business and Trade (DBT), is driving the strategy. Previously the chief executive officer of the Materials Processing Institute, McDonald is a welcoming face to those supporting UK critical minerals.

Advertisement
Illustration: Tracy Worrall
Illustration: Tracy Worrall

“Chris has got a lot of experience in this sector,” says Moon. “That really helps because he understands the opportunity, but he also understands the requirement for investment in processing. He’s in Stockton North; he understands the importance of the community side, of making sure there’s the right housing and social care.”

“We need the government to be ambitious and forward looking, and back the Cornish-Celtic Tiger – because we will roar if we’re given a chance,” he adds.

McDonald recently attended an event in No 11 hosted by Reeves, to which SMEs from the South West and North East were invited. Nick Pople, the managing director of Northern Lithium, who was also there, said McDonald showed he understands the UK must move at pace to secure its supply chain. 

“He agrees that we need – and I would hope that the government and Rachel would agree – to be producing as much lithium as we can domestically in the UK as quickly as we can,” Pople says, “to ensure that we’ve got security of supply within the UK for the UK industry.”

Working together, Northern Lithium and Cornish Lithium could produce 50 per cent of the UK’s demand for lithium – essential for electric vehicle batteries – by 2035, he adds.

Advertisement

The previous Conservative government published a critical minerals strategy in 2022, which was updated in 2023. But King says the Labour government – and Moon’s dogged Cornish MP colleagues, working from their shared Westminster office – have been more “politically active” in raising awareness of critical minerals.

However, Labour has prevaricated over the CMS – drafting the document, then drafting again – leaving a strategic vacuum for the sector.

“The critical mineral strategy suffers and benefits from a lot of the same things that have been there with other strategies with this government,” says Dan Marks, research fellow for energy security at think tank Rusi.

“They are thinking about it quite carefully, and have been moving in the right direction, making some sensible changes and putting some money behind it, but moving incredibly slowly and lacking the more radical changes or strategic thinking that would really move the dial.” 

Advertisement

Whitehall’s sluggishness is proving harmful. In October, UK-based mining company Pensana scrapped its £250m critical minerals processing plant beside the Humber – a project that promised to create 126 jobs – to move its refining operations to the US.

Either UK PLC takes advantage of the Cornish opportunity, or international investors will

“Europe and the UK have been talking about critical minerals for ages,” Pensana’s chairman, Paul Atherley said. “But when the Americans do it, they go big and hard, and make it happen. We don’t; we mostly just talk about it.”

Advertisement

For European countries firing up their defence industries, accessing secure sources of critical minerals has become vital. In July, the European Commission’s first ever stockpiling strategy concerned plans for food reserves and medical equipment – but also critical minerals.

Yet the UK defence industry has been left rudderless while it waits for the CMS.  Last week, The i reported that the UK risks falling behind in the race to access critical minerals used in F-35 fighter jets.

Marks thinks there has been a “massive oversight” in Keir Starmer’s government to incentivise the UK defence industry to secure its own critical minerals supply chains. “I don’t get the sense that defence industries are expecting to have to do anything about this any time soon,” he says. “If they’re not, then that’s a massive vulnerability.”

Of the drones currently being made in the UK, for instance, around 90 per cent of their flight controllers – the core electronic boards managing flight stability, sensors, and controls – are made in China, The House has found. 

Advertisement

As the UK slowly wakes up to the potential of mining its own underground stores of lithium, tin and copper, so too has China. 

While official Chinese delegations have previously visited the UK to learn about our critical minerals sector, China is now sending a delegation from its Sichuan Provincial Natural Resources Investment Group (SPNRIG) – a capital investment company focusing on the energy industry – to the UK, The House has learned.

The delegation comprises 11 senior representatives primarily responsible for investment and strategic development at the company. 

Bonjoe Education, a London-based company that specialises in such exchanges between the UK and China, will be hosting the group. Bonjoe Education’s programmes have fostered an “understanding of different cultures” and have had “great influence” on communities at home and abroad, its website reads. Bonjoe Education declined to comment.

Advertisement

SPNRIG has also been reaching out to specialist critical mineral organisations in the UK, The House understands. 

While the aims of the visit remain unclear, industry figures have reason to fear. Earlier this year, British-based Anglo American sold its Brazilian ferronickel operations in Brazil to MMG Singapore, whose largest shareholder is China Minmetals, a Chinese state-controlled company. Critics warned this would leave Beijing with greater control over critical minerals vital to the UK’s defence, clean energy and industrial sectors.

“Ultimately, either UK PLC takes advantage of the Cornish opportunity, or international investors will,” says Moon. 

“We have international visitors who come and look and talk to our businesses all the time. I’m very, very hopeful that the government is not going to take their eye onto other things and allow those international investors to dominate the Cornish critical minerals opportunity.”

Advertisement

Moon lists international investors from Singapore, China, America and Canada as those, “as sure as eggs is eggs”, who would raid our assets. 

“There’s not a massive appetite within Cornwall to sell out to Chinese investors. But ultimately, this is an area that has been deprived for a very long time, there is an opportunity to create jobs to make sure that we get some economic stability within Cornwall. It would be a mistake, in my view, to not be taking advantage of that and letting international players dominate.” 

“There is no western stage one processing capacity for tungsten from concentrate into the first stage of refined product,” says Mark Burnett, chief executive officer of Strategic Minerals. 

“[I’d be lying if I said] we hadn’t been contacted by a corporate party that is related in some way to China – but it’s rather inescapable. But to be clear, from a board, a company and a management and team perspective, we don’t want to take that route. We want to develop a tungsten mine in the UK that’s the highest-grade tungsten mine in Europe, and largely in the world.”

Advertisement

History has shown that when foreign investors buy domestic critical minerals assets, local communities can suffer.

Swiss mining company Xstrata took full control of the Windimurra Vanadium plant in Western Australia, for example, only to shut the mine down just months later in 2004. Hundreds of people were left jobless.

“They were protecting the South African market, the South African mines, so they didn’t want a new entrant into the market,” says Gavin Mudd, director of the Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre at the British Geological Survey. 

“There was an extension from the gas pipeline built for that, so it could actually have a gas fired power station and therefore, in theory, cheaper electricity. That was subsidised by something like $100m or $200m by the West Australian government. To have that facility mothballed was a huge waste of taxpayers’ money.”

Advertisement

For now, momentum is on the side of British miners. But while the UK may be seeing its own ‘gold rush’, the danger is that government funding “freezes up and dries up”, says Burnett.

As world powers race to secure their own critical minerals, Labour faces a choice: continue to invest in our own critical minerals and support our ‘Cornish boys’ or watch as others reap the rewards. 

A government spokesperson said: “Securing our supply of critical minerals, including nickel, is vital for our industrial strategy, economic growth and clean energy transition.

“We’re working with UK industry and G7 partners to develop plans that will reinforce our supply chains for the long term, increase the resilience of our economy and drive forward our Plan for Change.” 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Bridgerton star has praised season 4's uncomfortable sex scenes

Published

on

Bridgerton star has praised season 4's uncomfortable sex scenes

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”b4e438c3-3507-4762-913c-720170c1c80d”}).render(“69836f74e4b0926afe69db14”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | Charitable partnership enhances support to veterans

Published

on

Politics Home | BGC proud of members' role in hard-pressed high streets as government announces 'Pride in Place' programme

Veterans Aid (VA), the UK’s frontline charity for veterans in crisis, has become the latest charitable partner of the Honourable Artillery Company (HAC), the oldest regiment in the British Army.

VA has been operating since 1932 and enjoys an externally validated success rate of 90% in terms of transforming broken lives. For the next three years it will be the beneficiary of fundraising events and other support from the HAC in acknowledgement of the two organisations’ shared commitment to those who have served, and their families.

CEO of Veterans Aid Prof Hugh Milroy said, “We were delighted and honoured to have the value of our work acknowledged in this way by the HAC. VA deals with the consequences of crisis and poverty; issues that don’t sit comfortably with the public image of military heroism and glamour. In fact, we operate in the real world, practicing the real values of the military family where ‘man down’ is a call to immediate action. As an organisation that spends hardly anything on advertising or self-promotion, we are singularly mindful of how valuable support from organisations like the HAC can be in helping us reach donors and – more importantly – those who so desperately need our help.”

Advertisement

Marcus Simson, CE of the Honourable Artillery Company said, ‘’We are delighted to support Veterans Aid as our sponsored charity. We have a shared commitment to those who have served and value the vital and tailored services Veterans Aid provides. Many are not available elsewhere. They include mental health care, housing assistance, job training, and peer support. These programs restore dignity, stability, and purpose, helping veterans and their families thrive rather than merely survive. Too often they are the only thing that prevents tragedy. The HAC is clear that all of its support to Veterans Aid will go directly to helping those in need. For the HAC, contributing time or resources is a tangible way to express our gratitude, uphold our shared values and ensure that those who protected our freedoms are never left behind and remembered with respect – always, everywhere.’’

The two organisations also share a relationship with the church of St Botolph-without-Bishopsgate whose links with both are strong. St Botolph’s is home to the HAC’s Regimental Chapel, which commemorates members of the Company who died in conflicts. It also houses the engraving of Hogarth’s Good Samaritan gifted by Veterans Aid to the church, as a symbol of its own partnership with the church.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Water companies are taking us all for a ride

Published

on

Water companies are taking us all for a ride

Campaigner and singer Feargal Sharkey has, once again, dressed down the privatised water companies.

Water companies: taking the p*ss

On social media, Sharkey said:

You’ll want to be sitting down for this bit. Water companies are currently £82.7 billion in debt, have paid themselves £85 billion in dividends, leak over a trillion of litres of water per year, dump sewage for almost 4 million hours per year, have been convicted of over 1,200 criminal acts since 1989 and an average of 35% of your bill goes on nothing but paying more interest and yet more dividends. And not a single company has ever lost their operating licence.

When the water companies were privatised in 1989 under Margaret Thatcher, they were debt free. Since then, they have accumulated £82.7 billion in debt, as Sharkey notes. At the same time, they have failed to invest in infrastructure to fix our dated sewage system. Instead, they dump sewage in our rivers and the ocean for millions of hours a year. And they haven’t just creamed cash rather than investing. Water companies sold off 35 reservoirs in just five years, making £26 million from flogging what were public assets.

On top of that, as Sharkey points out, a University of Greenwich study for We Own It found a “privatisation tax” of 35% on our water bills. In other words, we’re spending over one-third more than we need to every time we turn on the taps.

Advertisement

Privatisation: 140 years into the past

Water was brought into public ownership in the late 1800s. Even back then, people knew it was a natural monopoly and a daily essential for all humans. Selling it off just means one then rents it at higher cost.

Thatcher’s government and then the neoliberals in Labour, Reform and the Tories maintaining privatisation of water, have brought us 140 years into the past.

Sharkey is spot on to take down the polluting profiteers.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Homeless children in Scotland pass 10,000 mark

Published

on

Homeless children in Scotland pass 10,000 mark

The number of children who are homeless and in temporary accommodation in Scotland has passed 10,000.

The latest figures from the Scottish Government show that, in the six months to 30 September 2025, 10,480 children were in temporary accommodation.

People experiencing homelessness increasing

In total, there were 18,092 households in temporary accommodation, a 9% increase from 16,634 in 2024. This is also a new record high. Households spent an average of 237 days in temporary accommodation.

There was also a 4% increase in the total open homeless applications. The figure now stands at 33,006.

Advertisement

The number of people sleeping rough has also reached its highest in over a decade – at 1,083. This means that one in 10 applicants was sleeping outside.

One notably higher figure is the number of households not being offered temporary accommodation. The number has risen from 7,565 in 2024 to 10,710 in 2025. Most of these were in Glasgow (6,815 out of 10,710). The local authority also reported high numbers in Edinburgh – with 3,585 instances over the six months.

A figure that has improved is the number of breaches of the unsuitable accommodation order. This states that:

the maximum number of days that local authorities can use unsuitable accommodation for any homeless person is 7 days and has the effect of ending stays in unsuitable accommodation, such as B&Bs, apart from in emergency situations.

In the last 6 months, there were 3,635 breaches, which is a 12% improvement.

Advertisement

Changing characteristics

Of the homeless applicants, 16% were from households that had been granted either refugee status or leave to remain. This allows non-UK nationals to stay lawfully in the UK following an application made from within the country.

In total, 2% of all applications cited “left asylum accommodation” as the reason for them being homeless.

There was also a decrease in the number of white applicants, specifically white Scottish applicants. Conversely, there was an increase in the number of African, Caribbean, Black, Asian, and Arab applicants.

This comes as the number of refugees experiencing homelessness across the UK has more than doubled in the last two years. In total, 4,434 refugees and migrants were accommodated from 2024-25, the largest number on record. Of these, 2,008 were refugees — a 106% increase on the previous year.

Advertisement

In September, Màiri McAllan, Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Housing, pledged funding for affordable housing, along with measures to support people in moving out of temporary housing.

Additionally, the Scottish government said it planned to invest up to £4.9bn over the next four years. This would help it achieve its target of delivering 36,000 affordable homes by 2030.

In a statement, McAllan said:

The figures do speak to the severe pressure that services are under due to the Home Office’s mismanagement of the asylum system, particularly in Glasgow.

Featured image via Centre for Homelessness Impact

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

ICE leave imperial ‘death cards’ behind

Published

on

ICE leave imperial 'death cards' behind

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) paramilitaries are leaving custom-made ace of spades ‘death cards’ at the scene of migrant snatch operations. The ghoulish practice has imperial origins. US troops used to stuff cards into the mouths of the Vietnamese dead. The practice – consider yourself trigger warned here, please – was even filmed for use in official military propaganda.

The truth is this isn’t the first example of long-ago wars inflecting US immigration policy. America’s imperial past and present is so deeply interwoven into Trumpian policy that we don’t always see it. Yet these cards are one of several crystal-clear examples lately.

ICE leave death cards

The Intercept’s Nick Turse picked up the story on 3 February. It appears to have originally been reported on 22 January 2025 by Latino community organisation Voces Unidas. After a snatch mission in Eagle Country, Colorado, relatives searching for their kidnapped family members found the cards at the scene:

After detaining 10 Latino community members, ICE agents left ace of spades cards—widely known as the “death card”—inside the abandoned vehicles. The cards, later found by family members, clearly identify ICE’s Denver Field Office.

The US used the ace of spades design because it supposedly had particular cultural power in Vietnam.

Advertisement

As Turse explained:

During the Vietnam War, U.S. troops regularly adorned Vietnamese corpses with “death cards” — either an ace of spades or a custom-printed business card claiming credit for their kills.

Adding:

1966 entry in the Congressional Record noted that due to supposed Vietnamese superstitions regarding the ace of spades, “the U.S. Playing Card Co. had been furnishing thousands of these cards free to U.S. servicemen in Vietnam who requested them.”

After Vietnam, as Voces Unidas pointed out, the cards were adopted:

by white supremacist groups to demean people of color.

On the face of it, this makes a lot of sense. ICE’s recruiting strategy is less about nods to racism and more about openly using fascist imagery, mottosm and even songs to attract recruits who align with a mission to ethnically purify the US.

Advertisement

Long history of racial violence

Alex Sánchez, president and CEO of Voces Unidas said:

We are disgusted by ICE’s actions in Eagle County. Leaving a racist death card behind after targeting Latino workers is deliberate intimidation rooted in a long history of racial violence.

He added:

This is an abuse of power, and it has no place in any society that claims to value human dignity.

Sanchez said family members of the disappeared had the cards in their possession. He confirmed they appeared custom-made and meant to terrify ICE’s targets:

These were not from a doctored deck of cards. These were designed with this legacy in mind. They were printed on some sort of stock paper and cut in the dimensions of a card.

Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security deigned to explain the cards.

Advertisement

The term ‘imperial boomerang’ has used liberally to describe what is happening in the US – and correctly so. Trump’s war on immigration is a cover for a war on the left and on migrant labour. He seeks to both create an enemy and eliminate rivals, not just at home but also abroad, as we’ve seen with Venezuela and Iran.

But there is more to it. Let’s not forget that a senior Border Patrol official invoked the Confederacy – the slave-owning losers of the Civil War – in a recently discovered email chain.

In truth, the whole spectacle is alive with fascist nostalgia about lost wars. It feels like fascists – many of whom are clearly now in ICE – are trying to correct various imperial and colonial emasculations through racist violence. Trump has given them the permission, the weapons and the authority to do so. At the very least, they are drawing on those vengeful energies.

From the War on Terror to the Confederate fantasy of a ‘lost cause’ and, now, Vietnam, the ghosts of America’s violent past are restless.

Advertisement

Featured image via Voces Unidas

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Palantir have major ties to Epstein

Published

on

Palantir have major ties to Epstein

Evil tech giant and NHS leech Palantir has links with wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. And Labour MP Dawn Butler has rightly called for scrutiny.

Butler insisted we should “not ignore” the connection between Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel and Epstein, particularly because it has infiltrated our public health system:

She had previously highlighted how the Conservatives let dodgy tech giants Palantir, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon get their grubby hands during the Covid-19 pandemic on our health data. In 2021, she expressed concern over the lack of transparency and the consequences for our data privacy.

Advertisement

Palantir embeds within the US, the UK, and Israel

As the Canary has reported, Palantir:

Neocolonialism

Palantir has latched onto the US imperial project and is now a prominent part of it. By extension, this means entering junior partners in the UK and Israel too. And apparent intelligence assets like Epstein helped to ensure companies like Palantir become part of this system of racist brutality and dominance.

Journalist Whitney Webb has written about:

The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein

And because of developments like artificial intelligence, mass surveillance, and drones, the baton has passed from people like Epstein to companies like Palantir. As Webb said in 2025:

you don’t really need Epstein in the Surveillance Era…

[Israel and others] don’t really need blackmail anymore…

Advertisement

Palantir, Peter Thiel’s company… that’s the new Jeffrey Epstein…

Countries around the world have already started to realise the importance of technological independence from the US and its dystopian corporations like Palantir. And if UK politicians don’t heed calls to do the same, they need to lose their jobs.

Because for the sake of humanity and our future, we should not only “not ignore” all of this, as Dawn Butler rightly said. We also need to actively campaign to kick companies like Palantir out once and for all.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Fox hunt ‘desecrates’ tranquil burial site

Published

on

Fox hunt 'desecrates' tranquil burial site

A pack of hounds from the Middleton fox hunt has run amok through a woodland burial site in North Yorkshire. The incident happened during the last week of January 2026.

Footage captured by national animal welfare charity the League Against Cruel Sports shows the hounds marauding through the Mowthorpe Garden of Rest within the Howardian Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The hounds ran across graves with the hunt failing to stop or divert them.

This is the same Middleton Hunt that the Canary witnessed a couple of weeks earlier. On that occasion, the hunt was behaving violently and showing no sign of laying a trail. Unless the law changes, and it may do before long, fox hunts can still ride out. But, legally, they can only ‘trail hunt’. This means following a scent trail, rather than actual foxes.

However, until the government moves decisively to ban them for good, fox hunts are continuing to cause havoc across the countryside.

Advertisement

The League’s chief executive Emma Slawinksi has slammed the hunt for its actions:

It beggars belief that the hunt would have laid a trail through a burial site so either the Middleton Hunt has no regard for the sanctity of this site or, as is more likely, the hounds were on the trail of a fox.

They have desecrated this burial site in a bid to carry on with a blood sport that was banned 20 years ago.

Hunts are behaving in an appalling way, intent on chasing and killing foxes and not caring about their anti-social behaviour and the impact they are having on local communities and the people who live in the countryside.

The hounds were also caught terrorising local wildlife with two deer filmed fleeing for their lives.

Advertisement

‘Trail hunting a smokescreen for fox hunts’

The footage of the Middleton Hunt is being released the day after Channel 4 News aired footage gathered by the League of the same hunt’s hounds chasing a fox on Christmas Eve 2025.

The League released figures ahead of Boxing Day showing an increase in the number of reports of hunts chasing foxes and wreaking havoc on rural communities.

Chief superintendent Matt Longman, the national lead on fox hunting crime, has described trail hunting as a “smokescreen for illegal fox hunting”. He also described illegal hunting as “prolific”.

The government has announced it will launch a consultation to ban trail hunting, though this has suffered delays.

Advertisement

Slawinksi added:

I would urge the public who are sick and tired of the behaviour of fox hunts to take part in the government’s hunting consultation.

The time for change is now. We want to see trail hunting banned, the loopholes in the law removed, the end of so-called ‘accidental’ hunting, and jail sentences introduced to act as a deterrent for those who would break new stronger fox hunting laws.

Find out more about how to take part in the consultation, and how people can make their voice heard, here.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Choppier seas await Mamdani-backed candidates after Diana Moreno's landslide win

Published

on

Choppier seas await Mamdani-backed candidates after Diana Moreno's landslide win

NEW YORK — New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s pick to succeed him in the state Assembly cruised to an easy victory Tuesday night. But Diana Moreno’s win in that Queens special election is likely the last cakewalk we’ll see from a Mamdani-backed candidate in the near future.

The new mayor has endorsed Brad Lander in his quest to unseat Rep. Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th Congressional District and Assemblymember Claire Valdez for the NY-07 seat being vacated by Rep. Nydia Velázquez.

The pair of Democratic congressional primaries is expected to be far more competitive than Moreno’s race, raising a central question: How far can a Mamdani endorsement get you?

“We’re testing that out,” said Grace Mausser, co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America’s New York City chapter, which has endorsed both Moreno and Valdez, but not Lander. “He has a lot of hard resources that come with an endorsement: his impressive volunteer and donor lists, his strong reach on social media … There’s also the soft power that we’re testing out now, right? Who is the leader of left and progressive politics in New York right now?”

Advertisement

Mamdani has so far been more involved in boosting Valdez than Lander.

The mayor appeared with Valdez — a Queens lawmaker, former United Auto Workers union organizer and the first elected official to stand with Mamdani in his campaign for mayor — at an event the day after she launched her bid. He also filmed a whimsical social media video set in a subway station to boost her fundraising.

Valdez is running against Antonio Reynoso, the Brooklyn borough president who Velázquez has endorsed as her preferred successor. Queens City Council Member Julie Won also recently entered the race in the progressive Brooklyn and Queens district.

The mayor has been largely hands-off in Lander’s campaign after endorsing the former city comptroller on the day of his launch for Congress. Lander, who cross-endorsed Mamdani in last year’s mayoral race, is running in Brooklyn and Manhattan against an incumbent with more than three times as much campaign cash on hand and the backing of Democratic House leadership, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

Advertisement

A political adviser to Mamdani said his team is still assessing how much to get involved in the two congressional contests and cautioned against reading anything into the fact that the mayor has been more involved in Valdez’s race so far. The adviser said the Mamdani team is waiting to make major moves in NY-10 pending the outcome of a court case that could scramble the lines of the district in such a way that Goldman may run in the neighboring 11th District instead.

Regardless, the Mamdani adviser, who was granted anonymity to discuss internal strategy, said the mayor simply lending his name to Lander and Valdez “already carries a lot of weight that these campaigns can make the most of.”

“His direct involvement is always going to be second to governing,” said the aide. “Ninety-nine percent of his energy is going to be focused on running the city.”

The politics-versus-governance balance is part of Mamdani’s clash with Velázquez, the highly respected progressive who effectively warned him in a New York Times interview to stay in his lane.

Advertisement

And the mayor does have a lot of work to do at the helm of the country’s largest city. June’s congressional primaries fall around the same time he and the City Council will be putting finishing touches on the city budget amid serious fiscal headwinds.

“I don’t know if that was the wisest thing for him to do because the job of being mayor is so big,” Democratic strategist Lupe Todd-Medina said, arguing Mamdani could end up in a situation where he’s not able to stump for Lander and Valdez as much as they want and need him to due to the sheer burden of governing New York City.

As June’s primaries still loom more than four months away, a Lander campaign official, granted anonymity to share sensitive considerations, said his team is also still waiting to see if a court decision could rip up the lines of NY-10.

But if the race ends up competitive, the Lander aide said his team is confident Mamdani will help fundraise and campaign for the former comptroller. The fact that Mamdani hasn’t done so yet, the aide said, is understandable since the mayor has been focused on governing in his first month in office.

Advertisement

The two House primaries have different dynamics but they’ll determine whether Mamdani can replicate the magic that catapulted him from relative obscurity to the nation’s second toughest job.

“He has a lot at stake by pushing in some chips on two fronts, but I think he has more at stake in the 7th District,” said Michael Lange, an analyst who specializes in progressive politics. Valdez “is a really close ally who comes from his political movement and his political home.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

LIVE: Commons Debates and Votes on Mandelson Files

Published

on

LIVE: Commons Debates and Votes on Mandelson Files

The latest: Labour is preparing an archaic last-minute manuscript amendment to its own amendment to cave in to some of its MPs’ demands with regard to how much information on Mandelson should be released. It’s bedlam behind the scenes…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why has Mandy been given such an easy ride in the media?

Published

on

Why has Mandy been given such an easy ride in the media?

UK prime minister Keir Starmer is far from the only one who stuck by Peter Mandelson long after the scandal surrounding him became impossible to ignore. In the past few weeks, despite new evidence of Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein being made public, the BBC continued to offer him a platform. And still today, even as the extent of Mandelson’s alleged corruption, betrayal of trust and potentially criminal activity is made clear, it seems that the commentariat is prepared to come to his defence in sympathetic tweets, interviews and newspaper columns.

Starmer appointed Mandelson British ambassador to the US in 2024, despite knowing that the architect of New Labour had twice been forced to resign in disgrace from cabinet posts and had maintained a close association with Epstein. It took until September last year for Starmer to finally give him the boot, after emails were published showing Mandelson urging Epstein to ‘fight for early release’ from jail, following his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

But while Starmer may have finally decided Mandelson was no longer fit for public life, the BBC took a different stance. Even after we had been treated to creepy photos of him in a bathrobe, casually chatting to his ‘best pal’ Epstein, Mandelson continued to be offered a cosy platform on the BBC. Just three weeks ago, on 11 January, he appeared on the BBC’s flagship Sunday morning politics show, where he was interviewed by presenter Laura Kuenssberg. Mandelson was given over half an hour to offer his take on the Trump administration, Greenland, Ukraine and the British government.

Advertisement

It was only in the final 10 minutes of the interview that Mandelson was asked about his relationship with Epstein. Even then, Kuenssberg threw him softball questions. This gave him a chance to offer a perfunctory apology to ‘the victims’, before giving his excuses. He told a credulous Kuenssberg that because he is gay, ‘he was kept separate from the sexual side of Epstein’s life’. Worse still, Mandelson – always the spin doctor – was able to present himself as a victim. He just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time as a maelstrom of sex and scandal happened all around him.

This interview was no one-off. Just days later, Mandelson was at Broadcasting House again, this time being interviewed by Sarah Montague for Radio 4’s World at One. Once again, Mandelson got to present himself as an elder statesman turned commentator on global events, with the promise of moral rehabilitation via apologies and disclaimers. We have to ask why. Why did BBC producers and presenters think Mandelson worthy of this reprieve?

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

But the media’s special treatment of Mandelson does not stop at the BBC. Even now, when we know that the real scandal in the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein was not sex but money, knowledge and power, he is being fawned over by some commentators. This week, the former Conservative MP turned Times columnist, Matthew Parris, has been gushing over Mandelson, describing him as ‘a man of wisdom and judgement in all but the conduct of his personal affairs’. ‘Within his party he has been a seminal influence for good’, Parris continues, ‘on the right side of every important argument in the politics of the left’.

Labour’s one-time spin doctor, Alastair Campbell, has been defending him as ‘talented’. ‘There’s no doubt. If you push to one side the reasons for his resignations, he was an effective cabinet minister,’ says Campbell on the latest edition of his Rest is Politics podcast. Despite Mandelson being implicated in the biggest scandal to hit the British government in decades – allegedly engaged in corruption that makes ‘partygate’ seem like the tea party it really was – neither Campbell nor Parris can summon up the words to wholeheartedly condemn him.

Advertisement

There’s a reason for this treatment of Mandelson. His role in orchestrating New Labour’s success under Tony Blair means that, even today, he is given a free pass by establishment centrists. They either refuse to believe he has done anything terribly wrong, or think that the sleaze, alleged corruption and seeming acts of treachery were a price worth paying for getting their men into power.

The Mandelson affair raises questions not just about the prime minister’s judgement but about Britain’s entire political and media class. Far too many decades-old stalwarts of the Westminster-media pipeline are implicated in defending Mandelson long after his failings were manifest. Either they have grown so used to shouting ‘scandal’ over every cake crumb and undeclared payment, that they can no longer spot the real thing. Or they so firmly believe in the moral rightness of the centrist, technocratic political project that they see corruption as a price worth paying. In either case, it’s not just Mandelson, Starmer and the Labour government that Britain needs to be shot of, but their sympathisers and hangers-on in the media, too.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025