Politics
The Trial of Majid Freeman, Day 2
When the judge entered the chamber at Birmingham Crown Court for day two of Majid Freeman’s trial, DC Sean Lambert was already waiting in the witness box.
Perhaps one of the most significant points of the day came in the afternoon, mentioned only as a passing thought.
Cellebrite
The prosecution’s lead counsel, Tom Williams, had handed over to his colleague Laura Jeffrey for a review of the “agreed-upon facts” of the trial. DC Lambert was being asked to confirm the details of a mobile phone that had been seized from Freeman’s room shortly after his arrest in July 2024.
Jeffrey asks:
It says ‘Cellebrite’ on the side [of this screenshot], but that’s just a reference to the software used to conduct the forensic examination [of the phone]. Is that correct?
“Yes”, Lambert replied.
What was not mentioned in the court room is that Cellebrite was founded by ex-IDF operative Yossi Carmil and is staffed by dozens of former Unit 8200 Israeli intelligence personnel.
This is something you’d think might be relevant in the case of a man facing up to ten years in a British jail, almost exclusively for social media posts related to the Gaza genocide.
The Universal Forensic Extraction Device, which extracts data including contacts, locations, deleted messages, and calls from smartphones and other devices, is Cellebrite’s “flagship tool”. Freedom of Information requests have previously revealed twenty-six of the UK’s forty-seven police forces admitting to using the technology, with others planning trials.
Cellebrite have not shied away from their own involvement in military operations in Gaza, either. The company has claimed that they have been “instrumental” in assisting Israeli intelligence with phone-hacking services.
Freeman’s online activity
On day two, the prosecution resumed on page 49 of the black evidence bundle – a so-called “timeline” of Freeman’s online activity.
At the beginning of day one, the jury were told that some messages presented to them would be taken from private message exchanges found on Freeman’s phone, rather than public posts. Some would pre-date the UK’s proscription of Hamas – a decision taken by then Home Secretary Priti Patel in November 2021.
In 2017, Patel had been forced to resign as international development secretary after conducting secret, unauthorised meetings with Israeli government officials including the now wanted fugitive Benjamin Netanyahu.
As reams of material were skimmed through, it became increasingly difficult to discern between the various categories the material was organized into. Whether this is deliberate is a matter of speculation, but many were simply reposts of major media organisations, including Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye.
Others seemed totally irrelevant to any accusations of illegality. Freeman posts a story about the ‘Fajr campaign’, where young people from across Palestine would take buses to al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem for early morning prayers. The campaign was a way of staking their continued claim to the sacred site.
In another public post, Freeman shares screenshots of a conversation with a friend in Gaza, wishing him an Eid Mubarak. He asks:
Are things still difficult there, or getting back to normal?
His friend replies:
It is air, land, and sea. 14 were killed today.
The brutal context
It was impossible to disconnect the social media timeline from the sheer brutality of the crimes Freeman was responding to. Strangely, this seemed to be the prosecution’s intention.
Other posts are certainly more impassioned in tone. One expressed hope that the Israeli war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu suffers “a slow, painful death.” Arguably, a view shared by many.
I wondered: is it illegal to express such an opinion? If not, why was it included in the evidence bundle?
Again, the prosecution were “building a narrative”. The defendant is not an ordinary person traumatised by a constant stream of the most brutal acts known to humanity, but a violent and radical “jihadi”.
Shared Twitter posts
A huge number of the posts are not Freeman’s own words, but shares of others’ content. This begs the question: does sharing a post equal endorsement and/or responsibility?
One Twitter post read:
The IOF have released documentation of some of the resistance fighters killed by an aircraft in Khan Yunis. May Allah accept their shahada [testimony of faith] and give them victory over the occupiers.
Another screenshot said:
If they claim to support Palestine but don’t support armed resistance then they are not our true friends. They want Palestinians to suffer in silence.
The post does not mention Hamas. So, is support for any armed resistance to military occupation now proscribed in Britain?
On my taxi journey home, I gave my driver a brief overview of Freeman’s case. He said:
But I support the Palestinians’ right to resist. I support anyone’s right to resist tyranny.
“Just don’t write that online”, I replied.
Featured image via CAGE International
By The Canary
Friendship is fine, love is divine and liquor is quicker, but there is nothing like a feud, especially when it’s between writers, who habitually hurl around words like nunchucks. Gore Vidal wrote that, ‘The three saddest words in the English language are Joyce Carol Oates’ and ‘My first impression – as I wasn’t wearing my glasses – was that it was a colourful ottoman. When I sat down on it, it squealed. It was Truman Capote.’ Truman Capote wrote that Jacqueline Susann looked like ‘a truck driver in drag’. ‘Every word she writes is a lie, including “and” and “the”’, said Mary McCarthy of Lillian Hellman. Flannery O’Connor on Ayn Rand: ‘She makes Mickey Spillane look like Dostoevsky.’ I’ve had some lovely feuds with fellow writers. I called Martin Amis ‘A small man in every way it is possible for a man to be small’, and told Camille Paglia to ‘Fuck off, you crazy old dyke!’.
But the trouble – and the real fun, the sadistic rather than the sporting kind – happens when a bad writer thinks they can ‘take on’ a good writer. It makes it especially entertaining if the first is a man and the latter a woman, due to the element of ‘mansplaining’, which we will see magnificently quashed. Even better if the woman is beautiful and the man unattractive, giving it a feeling of a troll trying to capture a warrior queen.
I’m describing, of course, the current ‘feud’ between JK Rowling – Saint Joanne, protector of tomboys and benefactor of homeless women – and Alastair Campbell, most famous as Tony Blair’s Groom of the Stool. Campbell, I’d wager, wanted to be known as a writer for a very long time, all those years when he was a liar-for-hire; his 2015 publication, Winners and How They Succeed, was swiftly available on Amazon for the poignant sum of 98p. Then, in 2024, after becoming a successful podcaster, he published his 18th book, But What Can I Do? Why Politics Has Gone So Wrong and How You Can Help Fix It, ‘A call to arms to people to get more engaged in politics and to fight back against the wave of populism, polarisation and post-truth’. Campbell is obviously blissfully unaware that he is part of the disease rather than the cure. Populism exists purely because elitists like him believe that they know better than the rest of us, and have been shoving their cock-eyed fantasies down our throats since the turn of the century. Still, the book became a Sunday Times No1 bestseller, which obviously convinced the man who started out his scribbling career as a grubby pornographer that he was up there with the best of them. And now he has picked a quarrel with the most successful writer of our time.
There’s been back and forth on X this week, but it seems increasingly likely at the time of writing that Campbell has retired to lick his wounds. He is humourless, like most dry drunks and all on the ‘progressive’ side (just listen to any Radio 4 ‘comedy’ show), whereas Rowling – who once seemed something of a po-faced swot – has become funnier the more successful she is. An early sign that she was determined to enjoy herself – and hopefully offend haters into the bargain – was when she pictured herself in April last year, drinking a cocktail and smoking a cigar on a yacht with the words, ‘I love it when a plan comes together #SupremeCourt #WomensRights’. She writes a cracking social-media post, too. She responded to the proposed book-burning of her Harry Potter bestsellers with ‘Whenever somebody burns a Potter book the royalties vanish from my bank account – and if the book’s signed, one of my teeth falls out’.
The social-media spat with Campbell is more serious – if one can apply that word to this man. After years of refusing to interact with any of us ‘unkind’ types on the gender-realist team, as is characteristic of people who know that they are doomed to lose any sensible argument, Campbell recently indicated that he and Rory Stewart would be ‘happy’ to welcome JKR to their podcast, The Rest Is Politics, just in case she could use the publicity, one supposes. This was after years of putting misters before sisters in the debate about whether transvestites should be given extra human rights to other men, and of only having transvestite-friendly guests on their show. More in sorrow than in anger (the same way he must have punched that journalist who dared to mock Robert Maxwell, his former employer), he added that ‘previous attempts’ to get her on the pod ‘have been rebuffed’.
A million memes bloomed showing unattractive men pressing their clammy attentions on attractive women who wanted none of it. And then JKR herself landed a sucker-punch: ‘That’s because I wasn’t interested in being used to boost the viewing figures of a pair of exceptionally arrogant men whose understanding of this issue drips with classism and misogyny.’ The three women known as For Women Scotland, who were in London last week marking the anniversary of their legal triumph at the Supreme Court, offered themselves up for a ‘grilling’ on The Rest Is Politics instead. ‘We are still in London’, they said on their X account. ‘He can ask us on the podcast and call us toxic to our faces. If he has the guts.’ Answer came there none. The groom was only interested in non-Transmaids if they brought the spotlight with them.
As an embarrassing addendum to this story, it also came to note this week that Campbell has raised a Groom of the Stool in his own image, when podcast footage emerged of his daughter, Grace, sucking up to a transvestite by calling the FWS gals ‘old’ and ‘ugly’. I say this in a caring way, as Dame Edna would put it, but could it be that poor Grace owns a Magic Mirror? Or is it that she herself looks so much like a bloke in a wig and falsies that she wants a world populated with such men, so she doesn’t feel left out? That she is seriously wanting in judgement is reflected in the way she talks about her ghastly father: ‘I desperately wanted his approval’, she once told the Standard. ‘I was obsessed with him and impressed by him.’
Which brings us back to her dear old dad’s weird would-be spat with JKR. Whatever one thinks of adults reading Harry Potter books (I believe that they should have their voting rights removed, but I understand that I’m an outlier here), there can be no doubt that it’s pointless to take their creator on – she will run rings around you. Which makes me wonder whether some fellows want something… weirder from their interactions with her than to come out on top. (Especially when taking into consideration that she’s also been the subject of weird online stalking this week by another transvestite fan, the lawyer Jolyon Maugham, who claimed a friendship with her which she understandably denied.) It’s a cliché that the kind of men who seek out a damn good thrashing from Miss Whiplash in a Bayswater basement are, in everyday life, arrogant types – judges and the like – but there’s definitely something to it. Do the men who seek to provoke her simply want to be put in their place by her?
I suppose we’ll never know, but one thing is sure: JKR keeps Campbell awake at night, whereas not a minute of her slumber is troubled by him. The words of Diana Vreeland – ‘Elegance is refusal’ – have never been more appropriate than they are when applied to this latest social-media spat between the queen of all she surveys and a man who will – no matter how many times he sells out the Albert Hall ‘faster than the Foo Fighters’ and mouths ‘Rock Star!’ to himself in the mirror of a morning – always have the tell-tale whiff of Groom of the Stool about him.
Julie Burchill is a spiked columnist. Follow her Substack, ‘Notes from the Naughty Step’, here.
From approximately 3am on Friday 24 April, People Against Genocide began occupying the roof of the Leicester factory of UAV Tactical Systems. Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest weapons maker, owns the company. UAV Tactical Systems produces drones for the Israeli military’s killer drone fleet, of which Elbit supplies over 85%.
Then at approximately 10am, an action taker from the group occupying the roof abseiled into the factory through a hole made with power tools. Whilst abseiling into the weapons factory, the action taker proceeded to damage the ceiling and air supply to the clean room.
The clean room is used to make essential components for Israeli military drones and, once contaminated, it could be out of use for several months.
The action involved four people from direct action group People Against Genocide. They successfully evaded recently-increased security patrols at the plant, and used 10m extension ladders to ascend over razor-wire fencing, gaining access to the factory roof. The team next began to use high-grade power tools to cut their way through the roof, to damage weaponry inside.
UAV Tactical Systems was originally a joint venture between Elbit and French arms giant Thales. But since January 2026, the Israeli weapons firm has owned the company entirely.
In addition to other military drones, UAV Tactical Systems is responsible for developing the Watchkeeper drone, based on Elbit’s Hermes 450 drone which has been central to the ongoing genocide in Gaza, and linked to the killing of seven aid workers from the World Central Kitchen in April 2024.
The UAV Tactical Systems plant has been the scene of numerous protests and actions over the years.
On today’s action, a spokesperson for People Against Genocide said:
Israel continues to slaughter people across West Asia, with weapons manufactured in the UK. We cannot stand idly by while Elbit continues to manufacture death and destruction here in Leicester.
Petitions, protests and lobbying decision makers who are actively involved in the Gaza genocide, has unsurprisingly, failed to create necessary change. Therefore, rather than appeal to politicians or the government, we’re bypassing the complicit decision makers and are taking direct action to shut Elbit down and disrupt the murderous Israeli war machine ourselves.
Elbit Systems markets its drones as “battle-tested” on Palestinians, and uses them to commit genocide in Palestine and to slaughter people across the region. For the people murdered by Elbit’s weaponry and for those whose lives are threatened everyday by Israeli military drones, today, we have shut Elbit down.
Featured image supplied
By The Canary
Politics
Three Palestinians have been murdered, in just over 24 hours, by illegal Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank
Early on Tuesday afternoon, 21 April, settlers were spotted near the school and houses in the Western area of al Mughayyir village, northeast of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. Shortly afterwards, an urgent appeal was put out on the residents’ WhatsApp groups for people to make their way to the boys’ school as settlers were gathering there and had started shooting.
School children in the West Bank
13 year old Aws Hamdi al-Naasan was fatally shot in the head outside his school, while he and others were trying to get out of harm’s way.
In 2019, Aws said farewell to his father, Hamdi al Naasan, also martyred by settlers bullets.
“Open the road.”
Palestinian children protest at barbed wire erected by Israeli settlers in occupied West Bank village of Um al-Khair—calling for their basic right to access their school, move freely, & live without occupation.
Imagine your child facing this on the way to class pic.twitter.com/UEYzUWQUbU
— PM of Palestine (@PalestinePMO) April 23, 2026
As 33 year old Jihad Marzouk Abu Naim was leading the schoolchildren to safety he too was shot, this time in the chest. He was also martyred. Abu Naim, whose wife is eight months pregnant, was about to become a father for the first time.
Settler colonialist murderers
Local residents say they have identified the murderer as illegal settler Shmuel Wendy, head of the Homesh Yeshiva “religious school”, a figure who is familiar to the community of al Mughayyir and the nearby al Khalil Valley (Hebron).
Unsurprisingly, Wendy, who calls for the “full normalisation of the settlement enterprise”, denies even being in al Mughayyir on that day. He’s said to be planning to file a “massive lawsuit” against the Arab-Jewish grassroots movement known as Standing Together which claimed, along with many others, that Wendy was responsible for the killing.
Here, a previous video shows an armed Wendy, who can be seen intimidating and assaulting Palestinians in the al Khaleel Valley, along with other young thugs. Abu Hammam, the uncle of the martyr Jihad Marzouk Abu Naim, is one of these Palestinians. Not long ago he was forcibly displaced from his land because of violence and threats from settlers and the occupation army,
Homesh Yeshiva, in the Northern West Bank, was established in May 2023 on the site of the formerly evacuated illegal West Bank outpost of Homesh. It is situated on stolen Palestinian land.
Covering the tracks
The same afternoon as Abu Naim and al Naasan were martyred, residents of the village witnessed the occupation’s military and intelligence walking around al Mughayyir, trying to tamper with evidence of the crime.
They can be seen here searching for spent bullet casings.
The following day, the IOF gave al Mughayyir residents no time to mourn their loss.
When the funeral procession was taking place, they fired tear gas at the crowds, and later let off toxic gas bombs throughout the village.
Then around two in the morning the house raids began.
On 22 April, settlers also murdered 26 year old Odeh Awawda, in Deir Dibwan, East of Ramallah. He saw settlers coming towards his house, on the outskirts of the village.
He went outside to protect his family, but was shot in the pelvis by one of the illegal colonists and died of an internal hemorrage.
Residents were responding to Awawda’s call for help, on the village’s WhatsApp group. But as they made their way to his house to help him, Israeli occupation forces turned up and arrested the residents.
Justice!
Of course, there is no hope of justice or accountability for Palestinians, as the Israeli occupation is again investigating its own crimes.This is nothing more than for show — to silence any international criticism there may be to the cold-blooded killings of yet more Palestinians. Instead, there is only a continuation of the endless cycle of violence Palestinians endure 24 hours of every day, with no hope of any protection from anyone, anywhere.
Shmuel Wendy actually the murderer of al Mughayyir’s most recent martyrs, true, but the occupation’s police, military, illegal settlers, legal system and government are all part of the same crime-ridden society.
The IOF account of the shooting spree in al Mughayyir on 21 April differs greatly from that of the local residents. The occupation’s story is that a reserve soldier on active duty left the vehicle he was driving and started shooting at suspects who supposedly threw stones at him. But footage from residents shows something completely different. Gunfire was in the area of the school, somewhere where there are no settler roads. There is also video footage of children taking cover in their school, to try and avoid the settler’s bullets.
Settlers and soldiers in the West Bank now indistinguishable
Settler attacks are well organised and coordinated. Very often the IOF are full participants in the violence, which has the full backing of the so-called “Israeli” state. Since 7 October 2023, there has been a huge intensification of the militarisation of the illegal terrorist settler movement — including the formation of armed regional settler reservist militias, known as Hagmar, to which thousands of settlers have already enlisted. There are also settlements’ “emergency response” squads known as Kitat Konenut, who are trained by the IOF and are given weapons by the occupation military as well. It is often impossible to tell the difference between illegal settler and the occupation’s military, as often both now wear uniform.
Since its creation in 1948, “Israel” has been treated by the West as something special. It is not. It is just another settler colony that systematically violates every law, with total impunity. But this terrorist state is only able to continue its genocide, forced displacement and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians because no meaningful action is ever taken against it.
It is time to end the hollow words of condemnation and do something. The Israeli occupation must face the consequences of its complete disregard for humanity, and so too must the governments who have aided and abetted its decades of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
‘They want to kill us by any means possible’
According to the Colonisation and Wall Resistance Commission, as of 22 April, 49 Palestinians have been murdered by illegal settlers in the West Bank since 7 October, 2023. 14 of these Palestinians lost their lives in 2025, while since 1 January, 2026, 15 Palestinians have been murdered by these colonists as of 22 April.
A resident of al Mughayyir told the Canary, “They want to kill us by any means or method possible”. Yet despite all the, harassment, violence, killing and trauma, Palestinians refuse to leave their land. Instead, they say the blood of their martyrs will not be in vain. It will only make their resistance stronger.
Featured image via the Canary
By Charlie Jaay
Politics
Politics Home | No 10 Has Created A Very Bad Relationship With Civil Service, Says Former Cabinet Secretary
The sacking of Olly Robbins has deepened the row between Downing Street and the civil service (Alamy)
3 min read
Downing Street has created a “very bad relationship” with Whitehall, which is making government “dysfunctional”, according to a former cabinet secretary.
Lord Robin Butler, who led the civil service for a decade until 1998, said the row between No 10 and Olly Robbins over the security vetting of Lord Mandelson had made him “very sad” about the state of the relationship between politicians and civil servants.
Last week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer sacked Robbins as the most senior civil servant in the Foreign Office, arguing that Robbins should have told him that UK Security Vetting (UKSV) had raised issues with Mandelson’s appointment as UK ambassador to the US.
Appearing before MPs earlier this week, Robbins confirmed that UKSV considered the case “borderline”, but stressed that Mandelson did not fail vetting. He went on to say that the Foreign Office faced “constant pressure” from No 10 to formalise Mandelson’s appointment quickly, and accused Downing Street of a “dismissive attitude” towards the vetting process.
The saga will continue next week, with both Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s former chief of staff, and Philip Barton, Robbins’ predecessor at the Foreign Office, both due to give evidence to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee about Mandelson’s appointment.
Speaking to this week’s episode of PoliticsHome podcast, The Rundown, Butler said the row “just made me very sad, actually”, adding: “Because what I remember was the civil service and the political advisors working harmoniously and with mutual respect, each doing their job but working together in the national interest, and that clearly hasn’t happened.”
He said the ongoing Mandelson row had exposed “very poor” communications between Starmer and Robbins, and described the relationship between Downing Street and Whitehall as “very ruptured”.
“The Prime Minister, and particularly No 10 and the political wing of No 10, have created a very bad relationship with the civil servants in No 10, with the Cabinet Office and with departments like the FCDO, and that, I would go so far as to say, makes the government dysfunctional.”
The former head of the civil service did strike a note of optimism, telling PoliticsHome that once the Mandelson affair subsides, the new Cabinet Secretary Antonia Romeo “has got an opportunity to make a fresh start”.
“It’s a question of leadership, and I think Antonia has got the qualities to give that leadership.
“I’m really hopeful that she’s going to make a difference.”
He added: “I’m sure she’ll be working on improving the relationships between the Cabinet Secretary and those in No 10 on the political side and with the Prime Minister, I think she’s going to be very good at that — and that needs to be done.”
Butler appeared on The Rundown alongside Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, Hannah Keenan, associate director at the Institute for Government think tank, and Suzannah Brecknell, co-editor of Civil Service World.
The Rundown is presented by Alain Tolhurst, and is produced by Nick Hilton and edited by Ewan Cameron for Podot
- Click here to listen to the latest episode of The Rundown, or search for ‘PoliticsHome’ wherever you get your podcasts.
Luke ‘The Nuke’ Littler gunning for glory
Luke Littler walked into Liverpool’s M&S Bank Arena on Thursday night knowing exactly what was coming. The jeers arrived on cue – loud, sharp, and predictable.
But the 17‑year‑old was unaffected by the noise. He has heard much worse recently, and especially after Rotterdam, everything else feels like background static.
He told Sky Sports afterwards:
It is what it is. I’ve won and we move on to next week.
If anything, the boos now seem to sharpen him.
Littler didn’t just survive the noise in Liverpool; he thrived in it, beating Luke Humphries, Michael van Gerwen, and Jonny Clayton to claim his fifth nightly win of the Premier League season.
It was a performance that felt less like defiance and more like inevitability. It was another reminder that the teenager who stunned the world at the World Championship is no fleeting phenomenon.
But to understand why Liverpool barely registered, you have to go back to Rotterdam.
Rotterdam: the cauldron
Littler has been booed before. Darts crowds are tribal, emotional, and often unforgiving. But Rotterdam was different. He said:
Rotterdam was way louder than this tonight. This week was nothing compared to last week.
The hostility stemmed from his now‑infamous spat with Dutch No. 1 Gian van Veen on Night Nine in Manchester, a match that ended with Littler bristling after Van Veen turned towards him while throwing match darts.
Van Veen later said Littler was “out of order” for celebrating toward the crowd.
That single moment ignited something. By the time the Premier League caravan rolled into Rotterdam, the Dutch crowd had made up its mind. Every walk‑on, every dart, every pause was met with a wall of noise.
Littler didn’t crumble. He didn’t even flinch. He reached the final.
This is perhaps his greatest asset: the boos don’t break his focus; they don’t breach his ability to win. They push him onwards.
Liverpool: a different kind of test
Liverpool’s reception was hostile, but not venomous. The boos were loud, but not personal.
After Rotterdam, Littler seemed almost amused by the idea that this was supposed to rattle him. He said:
I even proved to people last week that I can win games under those circumstances and I’ve done it again. There is no anxiety there. I just expect the worst.
Against Humphries, he was clinical. Against Van Gerwen, he was electric, roaring after pinning the final two legs.
Against Clayton, he was ruthless. By the end of the night, he had closed the gap at the top of the table to just three points.
The Van Veen question
Three weeks on from the original flashpoint, Littler and Van Veen still haven’t spoken. Littler admitted:
I’m not the type of person to go up and talk to him. Maybe he is waiting for me to go and talk to him, but I’m not [that] type of person.
Adding:
We can obviously settle it on the dartboard.
That quiet yet loud confidence will ensure the atmosphere will be electric when they next meet.
A teenager learning that’s here to stay
What’s striking about Littler’s rise is not just his talent – although it is extraordinary – but his temperament.
Most 17‑year‑olds struggle with exam stress, not 10,000 people booing them in unison. Littler seems to draw energy from it.
He doesn’t chase the crowd. He doesn’t try to win them back. He simply plays.
The road ahead
Littler is already a world champion. He is already a Premier League contender. He is already a threat to the established order. Crowds don’t boo irrelevance; they boo danger.
With four regular weeks remaining, Littler is within striking distance of top spot. He insists he won’t settle for a playoff place. He wants Clayton. He wants the summit. He wants to prove that Rotterdam wasn’t a fluke and Liverpool wasn’t a reprieve.
He wants to win everything.
Even if the boos follow him from city to city, Littler has already survived the worst. The rest is just noise.
By Faz Ali
Met police officers have arrested pensioner and activist Trudi Warner, handcuffing and forcing her into a police van.
Shrinking legal rights
Her supposed offence? Holding a placard citing the law outside Woolwich Crown Court. The placard told jurors of their legal right — and legal right it is — to choose to acquit defendants because of conscience.
The judge in the Woolwich retrial of anti-genocide activists has ordered that jurors should not be reminded of their legal rights. Presumably this is because they might be tempted to exercise it and acquit the defendants. The same defendant has already been acquitted once before — evidently not the first time a judge tries this tactic.
Ms Warner knows all about that law — having been prosecuted for doing the same outside another trial. At her own trial, the judge threw out the charges and derided the Crown Prosecution Service for bringing the case at all, intimating that it can’t be contempt of court to remind jurors of their legal rights.
Yet here we are again, watching the same activist handcuffed and hauled off for holding the same sign that can’t possibly be illegal:
View this post on Instagram
The right to a fair trial
Defend Our Juries commented:
“There’s a High Court Ruling about this law” – Trudi ought to know, because the case was “the Secretary General vs Trudi Warner”. She was arrested in 2023 for holding this exact sign outside the trial of Insulate Britain protesters in 2023, and she DEFEATED the accusation in the High Court, much to the embarrassment of the government.
Just as with Insulate Britain activists who took action to prevent unneccesary deaths in the face of a fuel crisis, calling on the UK government to take action to retrofit homes in order to save lives, the Filton 24 activists facing re-trial today in Woolwich Crown Court are being denied the chance to tell jurors the whole truth under threat of charges of contempt. The Filton 24 took action to prevent UK-produced weapons being used to commit the worst crimes against humanity.
It was this type of corrupting of the right to a fair trial that lead Trudi to hold her sign in 2023, which replicates a 1670 placard situated inside the Old Bailey. After a year-long ordeal being pursued by the highest legal authority in the UK government, she won her case and proved that it is not unlawful to hold a sign outside a court reminding jurors of their rights.
Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience.
Jurors deserve to hear the whole truth.
Damn right. The Starmer police state is a rogue state.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Politics Home Article | Greens Hopeful Of Taking On Reform To Make First Gains In Outer London
Green Party leader Zack Polanski (centre) with Lewisham mayoral candidate Liam Shrivastava and Hackney mayoral candidate Zoe Garbett (second right), at the launch of the party’s campaign for the May local elections, 9 April 2026 (PA Images / Alamy)
3 min read
The Greens are so optimistic about their prospects in the upcoming local elections that they are now diverting campaigning resources to outer London, where senior sources believe the party could make gains for the first time, PoliticsHome can reveal.
With two weeks to go until voting day, the Green Party, led by “eco-populist” London Assembly Member Zack Polanski, is increasing its activity in the outer London borough of Bromley.
Bromley has traditionally been safe ground for the Conservative Party, which currently controls the council. The borough is seen as a major target for Reform UK, with a YouGov poll published this week giving Nigel Farage’s party a narrow lead over the Tories.
However, while inner London is seen as more natural territory for the Polanski’s party, Green sources believe they can also make a breakthrough in outer areas like Bromley.
Their hope is based on party canvassing data that insiders claim shows undecideds and non-voters viewing the election there as a choice between Reform UK and the Greens. They have concluded that the Greens could take their first council seats in what would usually be considered a Tory or Reform stronghold.
A campaign source told PoliticsHome that in Bromley, as well as coastal areas and parts of the North East, swing voters, including those who typically do not vote, are “seeing the Greens as part of that anti-establishment choice that had been Reform’s original driver”.
Green insiders are calling it “the Hannah Spencer effect”, referring to the Green MP’s seismic victory in the recent Gorton and Denton by-election. Labour, which had controlled the Greater Manchester seat for over a century, was pushed into third place. Spencer is being credited with “helping to refresh the image of the Green Party”.
A Green source said: “They [voters] are not even talking about Mandelson anymore – they’re not talking about Labour at all.”
A campaign insider added: “For the best part of the last two years, Reform have owned the electoral narrative – it’s been about small boats and immigration. The Greens have fought back and placed the cost of living right up there, and it’s cutting through.
“For voters who want change, but also veer left on many issues, like economic injustice, the Greens are fighting Farage’s insurgency and creating one of our own.”
Scarlett Maguire, founder and director of polling firm Merlin Strategy, said: “The Greens are feeling increasingly confident in London. That they are now looking to areas like Bromley is telling. They are not just looking to take on progressive Labour voters but attempting to vie with Reform for disenfranchised working-class voters.
“Their win in Gorton and Denton points to some success with this demographic already. They could do well if they don’t focus on cultural issues and instead tap into the deep distrust of politicians and the widespread anxiety the cost of living crisis is causing to voters.”
A Reform UK spokesman said: “Councils across London have been run into the ground by decades of Labour and Conservative mismanagement. They simply cannot afford the Green Party.”
The same YouGov survey forecast that Labour would lose six of its 21 councils next month, with the Greens taking over four councils in the capital for the first time: Hackney, Lambeth, Lewisham and Waltham Forest.
PoliticsHome understands the Greens are also confident that they can help end Labour’s control of Newham, and win seats in the north London councils, Brent and Camden, the latter of which the Prime Minister’s parliamentary constituency is based, though they are not expecting to take overall control of those councils.
On Tuesday, PoliticsHome revealed that Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, widely seen as a leading candidate to succeed Starmer, will be campaigning in several London boroughs this week as the party tries to limit its losses on 7 May.
The European Council’s latest conclusions on Cyprus warrant close attention in Westminster.
In signalling its readiness to support Cyprus in discussions with the United Kingdom over the Sovereign Base Areas, the European Union has moved beyond observation into active involvement. That is not a neutral step. It is an attempt by an external bloc to insert itself into a matter of British sovereignty.
We should be clear about the facts. The Sovereign Base Areas at Akrotiri and Dhekelia are not leased, conditional, or subject to periodic review. They are sovereign British territory, established by treaty at independence in 1960, and they remain integral to the United Kingdom’s strategic posture.
They are not a bargaining chip.
MDU warns Chancellor clinical negligence system ‘not fit for purpose’
Northern Ireland RE curriculum is ‘indoctrination’ – Supreme Court
Recent commentary from within Cyprus suggests a hardening of position, with the bases increasingly characterised as “colonial remnants” and calls growing for discussions about their future. With the European Union now lending its weight to that direction of travel, this is no longer routine diplomatic noise. It is the early stage of a more coordinated effort to reopen a settled question.
The United Kingdom should approach this with caution. Experience shows how quickly issues framed as “dialogue” can evolve into expectation, and expectation into pressure. The trajectory is familiar: once a position is treated as open to discussion, it becomes vulnerable to incremental concession.
We have seen elements of this dynamic before. The recent history of the Chagos Islands illustrates how long-standing arrangements can come under sustained challenge once their permanence is called into question. Cyprus is not the same case, but the lesson is relevant: ambiguity invites pressure.
There is also a question of impartiality. In 2004, Turkish Cypriots supported the United Nations-backed Annan Plan for reunification, while it was rejected by the Greek Cypriot electorate. Yet Cyprus acceded to the European Union in a manner that entrenched division and left Turkish Cypriots effectively isolated. That episode raised legitimate doubts about the EU’s ability to act as a neutral actor in matters relating to the island.
Those doubts matter now.
The Sovereign Base Areas are not relics of a bygone era. They are a critical asset for the United Kingdom and its allies, supporting operations across the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East at a time of heightened geopolitical instability. Their value is strategic, operational and enduring.
Against that backdrop, the Government should not allow informal or exploratory discussions to evolve into a process that implicitly questions the United Kingdom’s legal position. Nor should it accept the premise that external actors have any standing in determining the future of British territory.
Clarity is essential. The UK’s position should be stated plainly: the Sovereign Base Areas are British; their status is settled; and their future is not open to negotiation with third parties.
Anything less risks ceding control of the process – and, ultimately, the outcome.
Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.
lead imagePolitics
Widespread political and sporting opposition in Italy to the proposal to replace Iran in the 2026 World Cup
The proposal put forward by Paolo Zamboli, an envoy linked to US President Donald Trump, to replace the Iranian national team with their Italian counterparts in the 2026 World Cup finals, has been met with widespread rejection and clear mockery within Italian political and sporting circles, amid assurances that qualification is not granted by political decisions.
The idea emerged against a backdrop of escalating political tensions resulting from the US-Israeli war on Iran, but it quickly met with a united Italian stance rejecting the politicisation of football and emphasising that participation in the World Cup is determined exclusively by on-pitch performance, according to Reuters.
Official rejection: ‘Qualification is decided on the pitch’
Italian Sports Minister Andrea Abodi confirmed in comments reported by The Guardian that the proposal was “completely inappropriate”, stressing that the qualification rules cannot be bypassed and that World Cup places must be decided solely on sporting results, not through external decisions.
The President of the Italian Olympic Committee, Giovanni Malagò, stressed his categorical rejection of the idea, arguing that accepting it would be “an insult to sport” and that World Cup qualification must come solely through merit on the pitch, according to Anadolu Agency.
Shameful proposal from Trump
On the political front, Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti described the proposal as “shameful”, referring to the Italian government’s rejection of any attempt to inject politics into international sporting competitions, according to Euronews.
The Associated Press reported that the proposal was met with derision within Italy, particularly as Zamboli holds no official position within FIFA or the football hierarchy, which rendered the proposal meaningless from the outset.
The Italian stance reflects a consensus among politicians and sports fans to reject the American proposal, stressing that the integrity of competition in the World Cup must remain free from any political interference, whilst clearly upholding the principle of sporting merit as the sole criterion for qualification.
Featured image via the Canary
By Alaa Shamali
SLB (SLB) Stock Tumbles as Middle East Turmoil Hammers Q1 Earnings
David Beckham Takes Aim At Victoria’s Habit Amid Family Drama
The arrogant Alastair Campbell was no match for the great JK Rowling
Manchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
US brings back mandatory military draft registration
Steven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Politics7 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Business5 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Entertainment5 days ago
NBA Analyst Charles Barkley Chimes in on Ice Spice McDonald’s Fiasco
-
Tech5 days agoAuto Enthusiast Scores Running Tesla Model 3 for Two Grand and Turns It Into Bare-Bones Go-Kart
-
Politics5 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Crypto World7 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics4 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Business2 days agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Politics2 days agoDisabled people challenge government SEND proposals over segregation concerns
-
Politics2 days agoMaking troops accountable for war crimes threatens US alliance, ex-SAS colonel warns
-
Crypto World7 days agoRussia Introduces Bill To Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics2 days agoStarmer handler McSweeney to be dragged from shadows by Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Politics2 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | How To Get Away With Crimes
-
Politics2 days agoZack Polanski responds to home secretary’s taser threat
-
Crypto World5 days agoKelp DAO rsETH Bridge Hack Drains $292M as DeFi Losses Top $600M in Two Weeks
-
Politics2 days ago‘Iran is still a nuclear threat’
-
Crypto World3 days agoNew York sues Coinbase, Gemini over prediction market offerings
-
Business2 days agoThe Job Benefits Most Men Don’t Know to Negotiate
-
Politics5 days agoReform investigating candidate who ‘hates’ the NHS
You must be logged in to post a comment Login