Connect with us

Politics

Trump failure in Iran forces South Korea’s hand

Published

on

Trump failure in Iran forces South Korea's hand

As the illegal US-Israeli war against Iran drags on, it seems clearer and clearer that Donald Trump either miscalculated or fell for the lies warhawk allies sold him. And it’s spreading the stocks of US forces and their allies thin. As a result, they’ve had to get backup from South Korea.

Trump has depleted military resources

Amid Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza and rampage through the Middle East in 2025, the US army had already:

redeployed two MIM-104 Patriot systems and approximately 500 personnel from South Korea to the Middle East, which reinforced defences at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

The US also took “over 1,000 guided bomb kits” from facilities in South Korea in December 2025, along with “AH-64 Apache attack helicopters” in January 2026.

But now, there are signs that the unprovoked US-Israeli assault on Iran has been seriously depleting the aggressors’ resources in the Middle East. For example, after around a decade in South Korea, the US has apparently started to move out parts of:

Advertisement

the US-made terminal high-altitude area defense (THAAD) missile-defence system

There are also reportedly discussions about:

the possible redeployment of some US Patriot missile defence systems to the Middle East. South Korean media carried unconfirmed reports that some missile batteries were likely to be redeployed to US bases in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates [UAE].

The UAE’s increasing understanding that its alliance with the US puts a real target on its back, meanwhile, has made future planning more important. And South Korea will soon help the Gulf regime:

build ⁠computing power and energy infrastructure for the world’s largest set of AI data centres outside the United States… [as part of the] U.S.-backed Stargate project

Additionally:

South Korea has conducted an emergency airlift of surface-to-air missiles… from the Cheongung-II air defence system to the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

South Korea took about “30 interceptor missiles” from its own operational reserves to send to the UAE after an urgent request. As Military Watch Magazine highlighted:

Advertisement

This is critical not only to… sustaining the U.S. Armed Forces’ and French Armed Forces ability to continue to wage war on Iran using military bases in the country, most notably Al Dhafra Air Base.

It added that:

It is notable that South Korea is the only country that is able to [deliver] high performing NATO-compatible air defences on such short notice, with European states’ own systems having very limited capabilities, while U.S. systems have seen stockpiles severely depleted primarily due to operations in the Middle East, but also due to large scale donations to Ukraine in preceding years.

South Korea and its increasingly unreliable superpower ally

Under Donald Trump, the US has increasingly been showing its allies how much of an unreliable partner it is. And while South Korea still has one of the highest defence budgets in the world, the flailing commitment of the US – whose presence has been at the centre of South Korean military policy for decades – has sparked concern.

South Korea has tried to navigate Trump’s tariff threats carefully. But liberal president Lee Jae Myung has signalled the importance of a “more self-reliant South Korean defence posture” that doesn’t depend so much on a volatile US government and can help to avoid “entanglement in international disputes”.

South Korea’s government is also ramping up efforts to shield itself from the energy crisis that the US-Israeli war on Iran has created.

Advertisement

The US isn’t abandoning South Korea, though. Because it’s too strategically important in Washington’s efforts to ‘contain’ China. And US-South Korean forces are currently undertaking:

their annual 10-day joint military exercises on the Korean Peninsula… [involving] 18,000 South Korean and US military personnel.

There will, however, be “fewer than half” the number of field training drills (22) that took place last year.

That doesn’t make North Korea feel any better. The dark history of US war crimes during the Korean War (1950-1953) regularly reminds the North that the superpower “killed as much as 20%” of its population (some believe one million people), before backing numerous “right-wing dictatorships in the South in the decades afterward”.

North Korea, which developed nuclear weapons as a deterrent in the wake of the devastating war, still condemns the “clear confrontational nature” of US-South Korean drills, routinely responding with weapons tests of its own.

Advertisement

If less US involvement in the Korean Peninsula reduces the likelihood of conflict there, that will be a good thing. The bad thing, however, seems to be that arms are shifting to the Middle East instead, fuelling a devastating mess that the US seemingly doesn’t plan to end any time soon.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

YesCymru responds to Keir Starmer’s leaked memo on bypassing the Senedd

Published

on

YesCymru responds to Keir Starmer's leaked memo on bypassing the Senedd

A Whitehall memo has emerged, as Whitehall memos do from time to time. But this one, which Keir Starmer wrote to his ministers, has provoked a furious response from Welsh independence organisation YesCymru. Plaid Cymru obtained the memo and discussed it in the Welsh Senedd on 10 March.

In the memo, Starmer appears to suggest that UK ministers shouldn’t feel “deferential” in their dealings with the Senedd. In fact, they should feel able to impose their plans directly on the people of Wales, even if there’s local opposition.

YesCymru chair Phyl Griffiths said:

This leaked memo from Keir Starmer to Cabinet ministers is deeply worrying for democracy in Wales.

The people of Wales voted for devolution in a democratic referendum. The Senedd represents the democratic will of the Welsh people and enshrines Wales’ right to make decisions in areas entrusted to its own national institutions.

Advertisement

The Senedd was not given to Wales as a gift from Westminster, and any attempt to erode or sideline the Senedd or the Welsh Government would be an abuse of power.

But that is exactly what this memo appears to suggest Keir Starmer is doing.

It says ministers should not ‘cede our responsibilities, or channel our relationships solely through the devolved governments’. It also says they should act directly in Wales, ‘including through direct spending, even when devolved governments may oppose this’.

Those are extraordinary words. They suggest that Westminster is prepared to bypass Wales’s elected institutions and impose its own priorities, even in areas where the people of Wales voted to have decisions made here in Wales.

Advertisement

The timing makes this even more concerning. The memo says that ‘The importance of… elections in Scotland and Wales cannot be underestimated’ while calling for greater UK Government activity and visibility in the devolved nations.

People in Wales are entitled to ask why Westminster is discussing how to expand its role here ahead of a Welsh election, while also making clear that it is prepared to act directly when the Welsh Government disagrees.

This gets to the heart of the problem with devolution. It leaves Wales vulnerable to interference from Westminster whenever it suits the government of the day. Powers that are supposed to belong to the people of Wales can still be ignored or worked around from London.

Wales should not have to rely on the goodwill of Westminster governments in order to exercise control over matters that affect our communities, our economy, and our future. Wales and the Senedd should not be vulnerable to the changing political priorities of another parliament.

Advertisement

That is not real self-government.

This is why the case for independence is so powerful, obvious and undeniable. The only way to guarantee that decisions about Wales are made in Wales, by the Welsh people, is for Wales to have the powers of an independent nation.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

READ IN FULL: The Mandelson Files Part One

Published

on

READ IN FULL: The Mandelson Files Part One

READ IN FULL: The Mandelson Files Part One

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Iran prisoners held without trial must be released, says Amnesty

Published

on

Iran prisoners held without trial must be released, says Amnesty

Human rights group Amnesty International has pointed out the danger to prison inmates from the US-Israel war of aggression and has called on Iran’s government to release any held without trial.

The US and some human rights groups claim Iran is holding tens of thousands of political prisoners. Difficulty in verifying this lies partly in US political motives for painting Iran as evil and partly in Iran’s unwillingness to release prisoners it considers to be agitators.

Amnesty wants those who have not been convicted to be released so they can seek shelter. In an announcement on its website, the group said:

Ongoing US and Israeli air strikes near prisons in Iran are placing prisoners – including children – at grave risk, Amnesty International said today, urging Iranian authorities to immediately release all those arbitrarily detained and grant humanitarian release to others imprisoned.

Air strikes near prisons and the targeting of security facilities where detainees are held are putting prisoners in danger of death or serious harm. Direct attacks on civilian objects such as prisons constitute serious violations of international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes.

Advertisement

Alarmingly, the organisation said it had received reports prisoners were being transferred to unidentified locations:

Amnesty has received reports that some prisoners have been transferred to unidentified locations or areas close to potential military objectives, intensifying concerns for their safety. Authorities have also subjected some detainees to enforced disappearance and denied prisoners access to adequate food and water, including the failure of electronic cards used to purchase food and water from prison shops.

Those at risk include thousands detained following nationwide protests between December 2025 and January 2026, including protesters, human rights defenders, lawyers, medical workers, university students and members of ethnic and religious minorities. Others at risk include individuals serving long prison sentences and those sentenced to death.

According to informed sources, officials told prisoners held on politically motivated charges at facilities including Evin prison and Urumieh prison in early March that they would not be eligible for release, while prisoners convicted of ordinary crimes could receive temporary release.

Iran’s internet shutdown imposed since 28 February has severely restricted access to information about prison conditions, and the number of detention facilities affected by nearby explosions may be significantly higher.In a letter dated 3 March to the Head of the Judiciary, human rights defender Reza Khandan, arbitrarily detained in Evin prison, warned about the risks facing prisoners amid ongoing air strikes. Referring to the Israeli military’s air strikes on Evin prison on 23 June 2025, which Amnesty has called to be investigated as a war crime, he wrote that previous warnings from prisoners had been ignored before dozens of prisoners, staff, and family members were killed.

Advertisement

Reza said:

It has now been four days since the US and Israeli attack on Iran, and today our warnings and reminders have not been effective. Thousands of unlawfully detained prisoners remain trapped in prisons under the threat of bombardment day and night, and many essential services to prisoners have been cut off. If immediate action is not taken to release prisoners and the horrific and criminal event of the 12-day war or worse and more severe than that occurs you must be held accountable before justice.

Amnesty continued:

According to informed sources, explosions from air strikes targeting buildings of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting near the Evin prison complex on 3 March were so powerful that prisoners feared the prison itself had been struck.

Following the Israeli military’s air strikes on Evin prison in June 2025, Iranian authorities transferred hundreds of prisoners to other facilities in Tehran province known for cruel and inhuman conditions, including Shahr-e Ray prison (Gharchak) and the Greater Tehran Central Penitentiary, where prisoners have reported severe overcrowding and denial of medical care.

Iranian authorities have arbitrarily detained thousands of protesters and dissidents since nationwide protests erupted on 28 December 2025. Amnesty has documented widespread due process violations, including denial of access to lawyers from the time of arrest, the use of torture-tainted “confessions” and summary trials.

Advertisement

On 28 February, the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran. According to Iranian state-affiliated media citing the Martyrs and Veterans Affairs Foundation, 1,230 people had been killed as of 5 March. On 4 March, an official from Iran’s Ministry of Health said at least 180 children had been killed since the attacks began.

The US-Israel attacks continue, often targeting schools and hospitals.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mandelson was a known problem to Starmer

Published

on

Mandelson was a known problem to Starmer

The latest paltry release of documents relating to Keir Starmer’s appointments of Epstein-pal Peter Mandelson has revealed – more accurately reconfirmed – two main facts.

First, Mandelson is greedy. After his ‘sacking’ as ambassador to the US, he demanded £547,000 in compensation – despite remaining on the payroll. Eventually he received £75k – still about £75k too much, to many observers.

Secondly and more significantly, the release again showed that Keir Starmer knew before appointing Mandelson that he had remained close to serial child-rapist and Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein. Not only that – he was explicitly warned that appointing Mandelson was a major risk of ‘reputational’ damage. And went ahead anyway.

Went ahead with ‘weird‘ speed, to boot – according to Starmer’s own national security adviser.

Advertisement

Zionist without qualification‘ Starmer ignoring warnings to ‘weirdly rush’ to appoint a fellow Zionist who fanboyed an Israeli spy running a paedophile ring. Who’d ever have thought it.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Queen Camilla defies ‘culture of silence’ whilst silent about Epstein

Published

on

Queen Camilla defies 'culture of silence' whilst silent about Epstein

Queen Camilla has sent a message to survivors of sexual abuse to mark International Women’s Day to address the ‘culture of silence’ around abuse. This striking message comes weeks after her disgraced brother-in-law Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested following revelations in the Epstein Files.

It has previously been reported that Camilla played a key role in sealing Andrew’s fate as she feared his ties to an elite sex ring might demolish her work in violence against women and girls. However, refusing to fully acknowledge the seriousness of the Epstein files and failing to use her influential platform to demand justice for the victims does not reflect well on someone who claims to advocate against violence toward women and girls.

Nevertheless, it appears Camilla is trying to repair the damage done to public trust. Although, her advocacy could go a lot further and potentially make an actual difference for victims and survivors of abuse inflicted by powerful men.

In her speech, Camilla said:

Advertisement

To every survivor of every kind of violence, many of whom have not been able to tell their stories or who have not been believed, please know that you are not alone. We stand with you and alongside you, today and every day, in solidarity, sorrow and sympathy.

We hope this is more than dishing out empty platitudes, which the Royal Family are renowned for.

If you truly care, use your pedestal, queen Camilla

The Epstein Files have revealed a deeply sinister and horrifying web of abuse against young girls inflicted by powerful men. A picture even surfaced of the disgraced ‘prince’ playing with a toddler, passing a ball shaped like a female breast. This has sparked terror across British society, especially women. As Camilla said in her speech, women often live in silence with their trauma as society does not actually protect the vulnerable. Instead, it only protects the powerful.

Advertisement

This has bred a culture of silence around the abuse that powerful men perpetrate. Grooming gangs rightly resulted in disgust and condemnation, with a dogged insistence that all involved be held to the full weight of the law. After all, we apparently care about our women and girls in Western society.

Why do investigations and society consistently fail to hold elite networks of powerful white men accountable?

Referring to her own experience of abuse, Camilla spoke to this silence in her speech, saying:

Advertisement

Every woman has a story. And these stories must be told. Because when we live in a culture of silence, we empower violence against women and girls. It is for this reason that, for 15 years, WOW has been sharing women’s experiences through their festivals, inspiring thousands of people across six continents to take action.

It should not be overlooked that authorities arrested Andrew on suspicion of misconduct in public office, not on suspicion of sexually abusing minors. If Camilla genuinely cared about victims, she would ensure that investigators fully examine all suspects tied to Epstein and hold them accountable for their actions.

However, that demand was notably absent from her speech.

Education: not accountability for suspected elite abusers

Instead, queen Camilla pointed to sexual abuse being ‘everyone’s problem’ stating that it is “unjust and untrue” to label this as a “woman problem”. She says that “this scourge” can be “eradicated for good” if all citizens take responsibility to tackle the root cause of rising misogyny and abuse amongst men and boys.

Pointing to schools and playgrounds, she says that boys:

Advertisement

should be taught to manage and to express their feelings healthily.

and:

all children must learn what constitutes consent – and what is assault.

Yet, the queen’s remarks appear to imply that men and boys who commit abuse lack guidance rather than responsibility. She does this by implying that men and boys who commit abuse have not learned the rules or how to regulate their emotions. This framing may deeply trigger many victims, because perpetrators often reinforce the ‘culture of silence’ by claiming they could not control their behaviour, while victims sometimes feel pressured to rationalise their trauma as something they must simply endure.

Once again, victims experience a deep sense of injustice, and society undermines women’s right to anger. To make matters worse, people place the burden on these victims to teach the next generation how not to repeat the abuses of the past. Ordinary people will have to fix the attitude problem in men and boys; powerful women clearly will do precious little.

Excuses for men; par for the course for women and girls

Furthermore, this speech came after a meeting with Gisèle Pelicot, whose memoire of a decade of sexual abuse left queen Camilla ‘speechless’. Nonetheless, it’s striking that Pelicot chose to sacrifice her privacy and comfort where the queen holds back.

Pelicot showed tremendous courage in pursuing transparent justice against the web of abusers orchestrated by her husband. Contrary to the Queen, she didn’t choose to take preventative action through educating children to remedy her trauma, she pursued accountability for abusive men. Don’t get us wrong, education is critical, but so too is bringing offenders to justice.

We wrote:

However, the hypocrisy at play is difficult to ignore. Camilla has made little effort to centre the victims connected to the so-called Epstein files or to address the role powerful men played in perpetrating such traumatic abuse against young girls and women. Perhaps she will draw inspiration from the courage of Gisèle Pelicot and begin speaking truth to powerful men while prioritising the suffering of their victims.

After all, both cases involve networks of men who believed they had the right to do whatever they wanted to their victims. The case draws clear parallels with the thousands of pages connected to the Epstein network of elites, which included her brother-in-law, the disgraced former prince Andrew.

Advertisement

We can only hope that Camilla, who has expressed concern about the silence surrounding violence against women and girls, goes further in her advocacy. Victims and survivors deserve to see justice, rather than being told once again that “he couldn’t help it”.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Greenpeace reacts to threat of Iran war on global food prices

Published

on

Greenpeace reacts to threat of Iran war on global food prices

The US / Israeli attack on Iran has had serious knock-on effects across the region. There are also many global consequences. The spike in oil and gas prices is relatively predictable. But there’s also a very direct impact on global food prices.

Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz is disrupting global fertiliser supply chains. And this in turn could lead to a surge in global food prices. Amanda Larsson is Global Big Ag project lead at Greenpeace Aotearoa. She said:

The crisis brought on by this illegal attack by the US and Israeli militaries reveals a systemic failure at the heart of our global food system.

Almost half of global food production now depends on synthetic fertilisers produced by a small number of fossil fuel and agrochemical giants, leaving families and farmers to pay the price the moment fragile supply chains break.

While the human cost of the conflict continues to mount, the geopolitical shock is hitting farmers at the peak of the spring application, threatening harvests across the Northern Hemisphere and knock-on effects on food prices.

Advertisement

The solution to food sovereignty, independence, and local resilience is the same as that needed to solve the climate and biodiversity crises: ecological farming. By working with nature to fix nutrients naturally in the soil, farmers can break the cycle of chemical dependence, slash costs, protect our rivers from toxic run-off, and ensure healthy, affordable food for generations to come.

Governments must stop propping up this fragile corporate model and redirect financial support away from resource-heavy, industrial agriculture. Food security cannot be bought on a volatile global chemical market; it must be grown from the ground up through healthy soil and local resilience.

It is time to fund the transition to self-sufficient, ecological practices that serve communities, not billionaires.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour is taking inspiration from the Taliban

Published

on

Labour is taking inspiration from the Taliban

We regularly hear the refrain that schools need to get back to ‘old-fashioned’ methods of teaching. But how far back should they go? And, while we’re at it, to which society? Labour councils in the north of England have attempted to clear up this confusion for us. Seventh-century Arabia, at the dawn of Islam, is their answer.

In a document titled ‘Sharing the Journey’, multiple Labour-run councils have told schools that drawing pictures of humans could be ‘idolatrous’ to ‘some Muslim’ pupils. Music lessons could also conflict with the religious injunctions of Islam, on the grounds that ‘music is traditionally limited to the human voice and non-tunable percussion instruments as in the days of the prophet, when they were only used in marriage ceremonies and on the battlefield’. Dancing and physical activities also need to be carefully policed so as to ensure there is no ‘physical contact between male and females’, nor ‘performing in a manner that might encourage immodesty or sexual feelings’.

This is, to put it mildly, disturbing. These councils – they include Leeds, Oldham, Tameside and Kirklees – are effectively advising schools to look to the Taliban for educational inspiration. They are also denying pupils the joys of drawing, music and dancing. Any adult who isn’t chronically maladjusted knows that these expressions of creativity and affection are vital to a human’s development – indeed, they are among the most important aspects of any child’s education.

Advertisement

Critics might point out that drawing attention to this advice is just ‘fearmongering’ from the usual right-wing suspects. They will say that schools are simply being ‘mindful’ of the multicultural nature of 21st-century England. Of course, no student would be punished for his blasphemous doodlings, they insist.

But this would be to ignore the ways in which blaspheming against Islam is already severely punished in Britain today. In recent years, we have seen just how seriously schools take the concerns of Islamic fundamentalists when rumours of blasphemy get about. Most notoriously, there was the teacher from Batley Grammar School in Yorkshire in 2021, which happens to be located in the Kirklees council boundary. After showing pupils a cartoon of the Muhammed in a religious-studies lesson, he was first suspended by his school and then forced into hiding following death threats from Islamists. In 2023, four students at Kettlethorpe High School in West Yorkshire were suspended for ‘desecrating’ the Koran. One of them had read passages from the holy book before a friend knocked it out of his hands on to the ground, where it got scuffed.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The response to both of these incidents was telling. If you removed the name and location of the schools, you would assume these events happened in Iran or Afghanistan. The schools immediately acted on the demands of those demanding ‘punishment’ for the teacher and the students. That Britain is supposed to be a secular country, where blasphemy laws were abolished long ago, didn’t cross school leaders’ minds. One of the parents of the Kettlethorpe children was even forced into a humiliating public apology, where she pleaded with Islamists not to harm her son. The police ignored the death threats sent to the child, but made sure to record his scuffing of the Islamic holy text as a non-crime hate incident.

The new guidance confirms that the Islamic bigots have won. Their rules – their censorious worldview – now reigns supreme in the classroom.

And this same spirit of appeasement now permeates public life, too. Indeed, just this week, the Labour government formally adopted its definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’. As has been pointed out on spiked, hostility can basically mean any form of disagreement with Islam. There is every reason to think, therefore, the definition will only embolden the forces of sectarianism that are throwing their weight around British society with increasing confidence.

Advertisement

This has to stop. Muslims are perfectly entitled to raise their children in accordance with their religion. They are also entitled to send their children to one of the many Islamic schools in the UK, where any bans on singing, dancing and drawing they might want to impose can be enforced uniformly. But to pressure all schools to police children in accordance with Islamic doctrine is an intolerable attack on secular principles and freedom of speech. This can go on no longer.

Hugo Timms is a staff writer at spiked.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ben-Gvir, notorious Zionist, arms settlers

Published

on

Ben-Gvir, notorious Zionist, arms settlers

Fascist Israeli security minister and would-be executer of Palestinian abductees Itamar Ben-Gvir has reportedly removed remaining constraints on Israeli settlers carrying guns in Jerusalem as part of his incitement to violence against indigenous Palestinians. But only Jewish Israelis, of course. Any Jewish residents can have a gun even if they have no experience or training. And just in case anyone was in doubt that the idea is to shoot Muslims, Ben-Gvir said the change is to:

[save] lives, especially during wartime and Ramadan.

What could possibly go wrong?

Ben-Gvir rumours

But where is Ben-Gvir? The racist horror has not been seen in a public setting for several days. Unfounded claims have since circulated on social media that his settler-colony home had been hit by an Iranian drone.

State-aligned ‘fact-checkers’ say the claims of his wounding or death are false.

Advertisement

And now, ‘his’ X account has released a video with the message:

I’m alive, blessed be the Lord. Go fuck yourselves.

However, the video raises more questions than it answers. Ben Gvir appears for only five seconds in total, split into three sections of only one or two seconds each. The audio also shows tell-tale modulation markers of artificially-constructed speech. It is embedded below so readers can select their preferred speed and more easily scrub back and forth:

A clip of the sections only showing Ben-Gvir:

Advertisement

 

So where is murderous ethno-fascist land-thief Itamar Ben-Gvir? Did the Iranians wound or kill him in retaliation for Israel’s murder of its leader Ali Khamenei?

Arming Zionist settlers is exactly what such a figure can be expected to do. After all, this is the same man who has been banned by multiple countries for his naked genocidal ambitions for Gaza. Famously, he said:

there are no uninvolved civilians in Gaza.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

HuffPost Headlines For March 11

Published

on

HuffPost Headlines For March 11

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”07e92437-722f-4231-b7c5-6b1e26568a90″}).render(“69b1952de4b035c83fff76c3”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Analysis: Mandelson Documents Leave Keir Starmer’s Reputation In Tatters

Published

on

The vetting document prepared for the PM.

Keir Starmer was given every excuse he needed not to make Peter Mandelson the UK’s ambassador to Washington, but did it anyway.

There are few fresh revelations contained within the 137 pages of documents released by the government about Mandelson’s appointment.

The biggest one – that the disgraced peer wanted a pay-off of more than half a million pounds for a job that he was sacked from – simply confirms what we already knew about his character.

In the end, he received £75,000 – a third of which was tax free.

Advertisement

However, it is the confirmation of what the prime minister was told by his own civil servants before appointing him which is most damning of all.

The Cabinet Office due diligence report presented to the PM on December 11, 2024, shortly before Mandelson’s appointment, is clear about the extent of his relationship with the convicted paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein.

It shows that a report commissioned by JP Morgan in 2019 found that Epstein “appeared to maintain a particularly close relationship” with Mandelson and the now-equally disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Most shockingly, that report found that Epstein and Mandelson relationship continued between 2009 and 2011, after the billionaire financier’s conviction for procuring an underage girl in 2008.

Advertisement

Mandelson also stayed at Epstein’s house in New York when he was still in jail.

In addition, Mandelson went on to become a “founding citizen” of an ocean conservation group funded by Epstein and founded by his close associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

The document says that Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein represented a “general reputational risk” for the government.

What more evidence did the PM need that he should give Mandelson a very wide berth?

Advertisement

However, on the advice of his chief of staff, Mandelson ally Morgan McSweeney, Starmer opted to ignore this warning and appoint him anyway.

The political decision was taken that Mandelson’s ability to curry favour with Donald Trump was more important than standing with Epstein’s victims.

McSweeney ultimately paid for that calculation with his job.

For now at least, Starmer remains in place. But his reputation as a cautious politician who, for all his faults, at least does things by the book, is in tatters.

Advertisement
The vetting document prepared for the PM.
The vetting document prepared for the PM.

By no means coincidentally, the Mandelson documents were not released until after prime minister’s questions, meaning Starmer could not be personally grilled about their contents.

Instead, chief secretary to the PM Darren Jones was sent out to face the music.

He claimed that the “due diligence process fell short of what is required”, which is undoubtedly true.

It is also the case that Mandelson was less than forthcoming about his links to Epstein when personally asked about them by the prime minister.

Nevertheless, this does not change the fact that the details which were already in the public domain should have been sufficient to bar him from the plum diplomatic role.

Advertisement

Jones told MPs that Epstein “was a despicable criminal who committed the most horrifying and disgusting crime that destroyed the lives of countless women and girls”.

And yet, knowing this, Starmer still opted to make his friend Mandelson the UK’s ambassador to Washington.

It is a decision which should haunt him for the remainder of his time in office, and beyond.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025