Deranged and arrogant US president Donald Trump has demanded personal control over the choice of Iran’s ‘next’ leader.

Trump, who joined Israel in launching an illegal war on Iran on 28 February with the assassination of Iranian leader Ali Khamenei, has said publicly that he “refuses to accept” a successor for Khamenei who would “continue Khamenei’s policies”. In other words, one who would continue to resist Israel’s regional hegemony instead of capitulating like rebranded ISIS killer Ahmed al-Sharaa in Syria.

Trump went on:

They are wasting their time. Khamenei’s son [frontrunner Mojtaba Khamenei] is a lightweight. I have to be involved in the appointment, like with Delcy [Rodriguez] in Venezuela. Khamenei’s son is unacceptable to me. We want someone that will bring harmony and peace to Iran.

The idiot wants to ‘pick’ the new Supreme Leader as if it’s some beauty pageant.

Trump has continued to claim that Venezuela’s Rodriguez is now collaborating with him. However, Rodriguez insists that the Bolivarian revolution continues. She is considered an entrenched opponent of US domination — the old Venezuelan US puppet regime killed her father — and Trump’s posturing appears to be propaganda to cover the failure of his abduction of Nicolas Maduro to topple Maduro’s government.

Trump’s arrogance in assuming he can murder Iranians then decide who leads them is doubly arrogant given the Iranian military’s claim to have inflicted a loss of hundreds of sailors in a strike on a US aircraft carrier, and the massive damage Iran has inflicted on US military and commercial interests and its Israeli ally.

But if there’s anything Trump is known for beyond narcissism and Epstein-recorded paedophilia, it’s arrogance. So of course it’s no surprise.

Featured image via the Canary

A man nicknamed “Nasty” has been convicted of murder for delivering the blow that killed “bright” and “bubbly” Zahwa Mukhtar, 27, on a night out. Duane Owusu, 36, pleaded not guilty to both murder and manslaughter, claiming he shoved Zahwa with an open hand rather than a clenched fist and didn’t mean to hurt her.

He told jurors he acted in defence of other women they were with after several altercations between them and Zahwa on a car journey from Stoke Newington, east London, towards Dagenham last August.

Meanwhile,the prosecution called Owusu’s “assault” an “act of pure aggression”.

The jury sided with the prosecution returning an unanimous guilty verdict for murder after nearly 12 hours, following a two-week trial at The Old Bailey.

Detective Chief Inspector Phil Clarke, from Specialist Crime North, said:

Our thoughts today are with Zahwa’s family, who have demonstrated great dignity and patience after losing their daughter in such horrendous circumstances.

CCTV footage collected by the investigation team painted a damning picture of Owusu’s guilt. The evidence revealed him to be a remorseless killer, who acted with callous disregard towards his victim.

Zahwa suffered unsurvivable head injuries, the court heard.

Summarising the evidence, Judge Richard Marks KC described how Zahwa was struck by Owusu at the side of her neck “his arm coming almost in line with his head”.

He said:

She fell backwards on the ground, landing on her back, her arms flailing, making no attempt to break her fall.

She suffered a fractured skull and a bleed on the brain “which led to her tragic and untimely death”, Judge Marks said.

He went on to say the “traumatic brain injury” Zahwa sustained would not have been “survivable”, according to expert medical evidence given in the trial.

Zahwa Mukhtar was “kind and loving”

Known as “Zee” within east London’s Deaf community, Zahwa was a much-loved member of Hackney Deaf Club and a keen volunteer, including at Glastonbury music festival.

She became deaf in one ear after contracting meningitis at age three.

Henrietta Paget KC, prosecuting, described the financial assistant as “bright, bubbly, enthusiastic and very eager to learn”, during the opening of the murder trial.

A statement released by her “heartbroken” family last year said: “Zahwa was a kind and loving person with high aspirations in life and her presence brought warmth to those around her.

“She was dearly loved by her family and friends.”

In the early hours of Saturday 16 August 2025, Zahwa was killed outside Chadwell House care home by a single strike to the neck.

Once police officers had finished a nearly hour-long stop and search of Owusu and his five friends nearby, Zahwa was eventually found unresponsive at 5.31am.

Passersby who alerted police thought she was either drunk or had fallen asleep. Zahwa was pronounced dead at the scene within an hour of being discovered.

Speaking to Owusu, Ms Paget said:

You had lost your temper with Ms Mukhtar and was intent on giving her a beating. You kicked her and the second kick was aimed at her face. You missed because Ms Winter had arrived.

I suggest you were out of control and you wanted to do Ms Mukhtar some real damage. I suggest that your actions on that video had nothing to do with defending yourself or anybody else. This assault was an act of pure aggression.

How the night unfolded

Zahwa Mukhtar happened to meet Owusu and his group in Hackney a few hours earlier when the Mercedes he was in pulled into Palatine Road, near The Pubb. They continued to socialise in the street, taking nitrous oxide using balloons. The witnesses had taken other drugs that night, such as ecstasy, and had been drinking alcohol.

A toxicology report found Zahwa was two-times the legal drink driving limit when she died, which is 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood, and there was a small amount of cocaine in her blood.

Despite objections from best friends, Paige Allen and Abigail Winter, Zahwa got into the overcrowded car going back to Dagenham.

Fights erupted between all three women and verbal insults were exchanged. Tensions spilled outside of the car once before in Chadwell Heath before stopping outside the care home.

Inside the vehicle, Zahwa had allegedly threatened to harm the women and was seen scrolling through her contacts. Owusu started to think “the worst”, he told jurors when giving evidence.

Then Zahwa started filming from the back of the car. The video lasted just a few seconds.

Judge Marks said:

Ms Mukhtar started the video function on her mobile phone to which others in the car took exception and it was that, you may think, which finally triggered the tragic events which then rapidly unfolded.

Owusu demanded Zahwa leave the parked car and threw out her phone as bait so she’d leave. She refused and gripped on to his clothes, the court heard.

The judge continued:

She then ended up outside the car through the rear passenger door, ending up on her bottom…There followed two kicks from the defendant. The first as he’s in the process of getting out of the vehicle, followed by the second

Ms Paget rubbished Owusu’s claims that Zahwa fell from his lap instead of being pushed or he tried to sweep her legs away from the Mercedes rather than stamping down at her.

She stated Owusu had launched a “callous attack” and showed Zahwa “utter contempt”.

Owusu, of Althorne Way, Dagenham, will be sentenced on 12 March.

Featured image via Facebook

In an interview with BBC Newsnight, the Cypriot government have challenged the UK government’s response to drone strikes on the airbase on Monday 2nd March. The drone attack targeted an RAF base in Cyprus, RAF Akrotiri, a couple of days after US-Israel’s initial strikes on Iran on Saturday.

The base has long faced scrutiny for its involvement in Israel’s genocide on Gaza. Now it appears to be at odds with the British government, as Healey scrambles to address the collateral damage borne as a result of the US and Israel waging an illegal war of aggression on Iran.

Cyprus criticises UK response to drone strikes ahead of Healey visit https://t.co/GKukqNN9Z8

— BBC News (UK) (@BBCNews) March 5, 2026

Cyprus: “Disappointed”

Cypriot High Commissioner to the UK Dr Kyriacos Kouros spoke to BBC Newsnight and said Cypriots were “disappointed” with the quality of information the UK government shared with residents. Kouros said people in Cyprus were left “scared” and would “expect more” from the UK, adding that he would be grateful if UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer “paid attention to their worries”.

Home Office Minister Alex Norris told the BBC today that the UK was “resolute” in its commitment to protect our interests in the region and that “significant” efforts are being put into strengthening defensive capabilities in the Eastern Mediterranean.

According to the BBC:

Norris told BBC Breakfast on Thursday that defensive systems set up in the eastern Mediterranean have had a “really significant impact in recent days”.

The UK has announced that British warship HMS Dragon – which has air defence capabilities – will be deployed to Cyprus, although it is not due to sail until next week.

“We are absolutely resolute in protecting the nation’s interests – and that’s what we’re doing and we’re working of course with our partners of which Cyprus is obviously a really close one,” Norris said.

Advertisement

Following the drone attack at the weekend, Cyprus was quick to criticise Starmer’s government. They even refused to rule out going back to the table in deciding how the base can be used:

Cyprus today suggested that poor communication by the U.K. government led to the drone attack on the British airbase in Akrotiri, and didn’t rule out renegotiating the use of the base.https://t.co/x9EhthLcQs

— POLITICOEurope (@POLITICOEurope) March 2, 2026

UK Defence Secretary John Healey arrived in Cyprus today to meet with his counterparts and discuss potential UK air defence support:

BREAKING: Defence secretary John Healey has met with his Cypriot counterpart to discuss air defence support from the UK.
@AliBunkallSKY reports from Akrotiri, Cyprus ⬇️https://t.co/zXdxAhODKf

📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/qiEor0pnAQ

Advertisement

— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 5, 2026

“Strictly humanitarian role”

Our own Joe Glenton wrote about the issues being brought to surface between the UK and Cypriot counterparts. As divides are growing and consent on the island appears to be diminishing, Glenton wrote:

UK PM Keir Starmer effectively announced to parliament on 2 March that the UK would be a party to the war. He tried to insist the UK’s role would be defensive – but said the US would use British bases to hit Iran.

The UK has two bases in Cyprus at Akrotiri and Dhekelia. Britain has used the bases to launch hundreds of spy flights over Gaza over the course of Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.

Letymbiotis said the UK had failed to take into account Cyprus’s wish to be a humanitarian hub. He added that the UK had communicated poorly.

Advertisement

The damage inflicted is reported to be a little more than ‘minimal’, as the UK government have sought to convince the wider public. However, it also appears the attack was towards US military on the island. Simply highlighting the threat inherent in our support of the US-Israel flagrantly breaking international law:

🚨 SCOOP: Photo of damage to secret US spy site on RAF Akrotiri.

The drone hit a hangar for US U-2 spy planes on Operation Olive Harvest

Is this “minimal” as per John Healey?

UK Home Sec Yvette Cooper claimed the drone hit the runway. Not true.https://t.co/RsWYSDy9De

Advertisement

— Jerome Starkey (@jeromestarkey) March 5, 2026

RAF Akrotiri has long faced criticism for its use in the mass murder and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. Declassified UK’s Matt Kennard has investigated the flights from the base since the genocide began:

Labour sent this UK spy plane over Gaza for Israel yesterday

I propose we use same Shadow R1 (ZZ419) to take Starmer, Lammy, Healey, Sunak, Shapps, Cameron to The Hague when they are charged for Gaza war crimes

We should fly them from RAF Brize Norton via RAF Akrotiri on Cyprus pic.twitter.com/oPZcSk9Kl3

Advertisement

— Matt Kennard (@kennardmatt) July 24, 2025

Careful the company you keep

This escalating military situation has a common thread weaving throughout. This can be seen in the reports of attacks on Gulf states and those against the UK military base in Cyprus. Choosing to be bedfellows with genocidal war criminals and the compromised US president have understandably made those territories fair game in the eyes of Iran.

Under international humanitarian law, Iran’s response may be valid. After all, military bases that play a direct and active role in military operations against Iran may be considered legitimate military targets. Nevertheless, any attack by Iran must still comply with the principles of distinction, proportionality, and necessity.

However, the British government’s spineless refusal to prioritise international law is dangerous. It cannot be understated that our stance is making us a villain on the world stage.

Therefore, it cannot be clearer: breaking ties with the US and Israel will ultimately be safer for all involved.

Featured image via the Canary

Some Kurdish factions are going to start a popular uprising in Iran – least, that’s what Trump hopes – reimagining them as guerrilla shock troops for his aerial war against Iran. The CIA may have been organising them for months to storm Iran’s ramparts. The internet is abuzz with these rumours, so let’s unpack some of them.

Firstly, their accuracy so far is tenuous – something we’re accustomed to. In a fast-paced, rapidly globalising war mired in inaccuracy, rumour, propaganda, and outright bullshit, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.

The furore started with a CNN report by war correspondent Clarissa Ward, aired on 4 March. It’s worth noting that, in recent years, Ward has faced criticism over the veracity of reporting on Gaza and Syria.

CNN‘s piece opened with a weighty claim:

The CIA is working to arm Kurdish forces with the aim of fomenting a popular uprising in Iran, multiple people familiar with the plan told CNN.

The Trump administration has been in active discussions with Iranian opposition groups and Kurdish leaders in Iraq about providing them with military support.

The source? Well, they were on many occasions, they were literally just – nameless “sources”. And some key claims weren’t even attributed to ofifical agencies such as the CIA – but we appreciate these are “state secrets.”

The article, which can be accessed here, also claims that:

CIA support for Iranian Kurdish groups began several months before the war, one of the sources and a senior Kurdistan Regional Government official said.

A unnamed Kurdish official…well that narrows it down.

The anonymisation of security and military sources is, in itself, not uncommon. But CNN’s core assertions have been picked apart by journalists, experts and politicians with extensive knowledge of Kurdish politics.

Are they coming or not?

As rumours proliferate, journalist Mark Ames asked:

Never seen a covert CIA separatist military operation so heavily advertised as it’s happening, as widely and loudly as they can PR it. You’d almost think CIA was running a deception operation here, to stoke IRI paranoia and get them to massacre local Kurdshttps://t.co/Q00UC4isOM

— Mark Ames (@MarkAmesExiled) March 4, 2026

And he might have a point. It’s worth noting here that this isn’t the first time US President Donald Trump has publicly announced ‘covert’ operations.

He did the same ahead of the 3 January raid in Caracas, Venezuela.

Trump announced CIA were deploying inside Venezuela on 15 October 2025. https://t.co/7RZ8MMvr3x pic.twitter.com/YIqxZcMW1w

— the great Keithulhu (@jjgjourno) January 4, 2026

We can’t know if this was the US Yapper-in-Chief Trump running his mouth, again, or part of a planned strategy or a veiled threat. Nor do we know how Trump’s announcement was received by the CIA itself.

On X, the questions multiplied, with Journalist Afshin, engaging in on-the-ground fact checking efforts.

I spoke with four Iranian Kurdish officials, and they denied the report that any ground offensive started. https://t.co/EFPIDurpFa

— Afshin Ismaeli (@Afshin_Ismaeli) March 4, 2026

Wladimir van Wilgenburg, a Dutch reporter specialising in Kurdish affairs, suggested that while some Kurds have stated they may fight, mobilisation hadn’t commenced.

I spoke to senior PJAK official, who denied this.

“I think they are wrong when they say that we have already started the war now, but we are preparing for the right opportunity.” https://t.co/RjavebKOPs

— Wladimir van Wilgenburg (@vvanwilgenburg) March 4, 2026

Advertisement

Another Middle East-based US journalist Matthew Petti exposes similar gaps in US media coverage of Trump’s Kurdish shock troops.

Every American outlet is reporting based on “administration sources” that the Kurdish offensive has started while journalist who’s plugged into Kurdistan is denying it. Something’s up.

— Matthew Petti (@matthew_petti) March 4, 2026

So what is happening?

As one X wit put it, we’re faced with:

Schrödinger’s Kurdish militia

— Daniel Bordman (@DanielBordmanOG) March 4, 2026

Advertisement

Meanwhile ex-CIA director Mike Pompeo — who made unverified and inflammatory claims about Mossad being among the protestors during the January uprising in Iran — said:

The Kurds have been invaluable partners to the US in the fight against terrorism in the Middle East. It makes perfect sense for us to work with them to unseat this evil dictatorship. https://t.co/fTYeysSrfw

— Mike Pompeo (@mikepompeo) March 4, 2026

Anyone with the slightest knowledge of America’s long history of using and discarding the Kurds, like some burner phone, might disagree with Pompeo’s post.

As Drop Site News reporter Alexis Daloumis was not convinced that the Kurds were about to pull the trigger:

🚨NEW from @Dropsite: Kurdish, Iranian sources reject claims of incursion

Multiple media reports, including some citing anonymous U.S. officials, have indicated that Kurdish militants have now crossed from Iraq into Iran in order to seize Kurdish territory and spark an uprising.…

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) March 4, 2026

Drop Site News speculates that:

These reports may be aimed at sparking an uprising that is not yet happening. Reporters for CNN, Axios, and the Economist, some of whom are well sourced with the U.S. security establishment, have been leading sources of the claims. U.S. and Israeli officials have made no secret that they want to create conditions for an internal uprising to implement their regime change agenda on the ground.

Kurdish Peace Institute director Meghan Bodette was not convinced either:

The KDP and the PUK are, and I cannot stress this enough, never going to invade Iran. Let’s not comment on this if we can’t find Erbil on a map. https://t.co/cY9EXu3HUS

— Meghan Bodette (@_____mjb) March 5, 2026

Bodette also tweeted a useful explainer thread of Kurdish politics:

🧵Kurdish regional politics explainer, from someone who is based in the region and can speak the language.

— Meghan Bodette (@_____mjb) March 5, 2026

Breaking Points presenter Krystal Ball had a similar view, warning of ‘psy-ops’:

Very important reminder to beware of all the many psyops we are already being subjected to. https://t.co/JPW42zfBuU

— Krystal Ball (@krystalball) March 5, 2026

Ryan Grim, from Drop Site News, warned that the suggestion of Kurdish uprising might be a ploy to drag Iranian forces in a particular direction.

This is precisely what the CIA was hoping to provoke by leaking reports of an uprising and invasion that isn’t happening https://t.co/i9jNvcBmQ5

— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) March 4, 2026

Commenting on those strikes, Erbil-based member of Iraq’s Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), Hemn Hawrami said:

Reports about the Kurdistan Region of Iraq or the Iraqi Kurds being a part of a plan to arm & support the Iranian Kurdish opposition to cross the borders into Iran 4 an arm struggle is incorrect & false. We are not a part of this war & our goal is to preserve, maintain peace and security of our region & beyond.

In the meantime we condemn these unjustifiable attacks on Kurdistan & call on the international community to help us and stop this aggression and protect our region.

Adam Weinstein, deputy director of the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute, commenting on the pitfalls of a possible Kurdish-led revolt in Iran said:

An ethnic-based insurgency, however, is unlikely to attract broad support across Iran’s population. It will also raise immediate alarm in Ankara. Turkey has long opposed U.S. cooperation with Kurdish armed groups in Syria and will certainly view the emergence of a U.S.-backed Kurdish militant foothold inside Iran with equal concern.

Extreme caution advised

Misinformation, disinformation, and the language of ‘false flags’ and ‘psy-ops’ have become ubiquitous — especially on social media. The Canary previously wrote that there’s a delicate balance to be struck between citing and challenging state sources, especially “anonymous” security sources:

Anything uttered by unnamed ‘security sources’ must be taken with extreme caution.

We must always ask a crucial question when confronted with seductive ‘insider’ information:

It might not be the case here, but one of the key media stories of the War on Terror era is that journalists often fail to ask the key question: Why are spies telling me this?

The warning is clear:

Don’t be bedazzled, mainstream media journos. Intelligence agents, agencies and their spokespeople are not your friends. Contest everything they say.

Additionally, we should remember that Kurds in Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Turkey and a broader diaspora (who should never be flattened into a single political bloc) are once again caught up in an imperialist war they did not choose.

Let’s recall the US and Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

States, corporations, and political groups—all of them, even those we might feel some misguided affinity for—lie and deceive in peacetime, and even more so during war. In a situation as explosive as the one the US and Israel have thrust the world into, reporters have to take extra caution.

Anything can be newsworthy, even a rumour, but the basic rule still stands: if you can’t prove it, don’t report it as fact.

Featured image via the Canary

La Liga has launched an official investigation into allegations that Elche player Rafa Mir directed a racist remark at Espanyol’s Moroccan player Omar El Helali during their La Liga match on Sunday evening.

El Helali informed the referee that Mir had racially abused him, saying, “you came here on a dingy,” a phrase with obvious racist connotations.

Following El Helali’s complaint, the referee immediately activated the anti-racism protocol and temporarily halted play.

The referee included the incident in his official match report, prompting La Liga to refer the case to the relevant disciplinary bodies for review.

Espanyol’s stance

A source at the Spanish club added that midfielder Urco was next to Al-Hilali and heard the remark attributed to Rafa Mir.

The source also indicated that Al-Hilali trained normally the following day and is in good condition, emphasizing that the club fully supports its player.

As the BBC reported:

Espanyol later posted a picture of 22-year-old Spain-born Morocco international El Hilali on social media with the message “with you”.

The Moroccan Federation’s stance

Following the incident, the Moroccan Football Federation issued an official statement declaring its full support for Al-Hilali, considering what happened a “blatant violation of fair play principles.”

The Moroccan Federation is monitoring the investigations launched by La Liga to ensure the player receives justice and legal redress.

As of now, no official penalty has been issued. Spanish press reports indicate that the case has been referred to the Competition Committee and the Anti-Violence and Discrimination Committee, with a decision expected in the coming days.

The case is now before La Liga’s disciplinary bodies, with anticipation surrounding the nature of the decision, especially given the increasing strictness within Spanish football regarding discrimination and racism in stadiums.

Featured image via the Canary

US President Donald Trump said he doesn’t really care about the Iranian national team’s participation in the 2026 World Cup, which will be co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico this year.

Trump’s remarks came in an interview with Politico, where he was asked about Iran’s participation in the upcoming men’s football World Cup:

I really don’t care. I think Iran is a very badly defeated country. They’re running on fumes.

Whose fault is that, shithead?

Trump leads unprovoked attack on Iran

Trump’s statement coincided with the escalation of conflict in the Middle East following the US-Israeli attack on Iran last Saturday.

The Iranian national team had qualified for the World Cup for the fourth consecutive time. They will begin their campaign against New Zealand and Belgium in Los Angeles and conclude the group stage against Egypt in Seattle.

There has been no official announcement from Tehran regarding withdrawal from the tournament, despite the recent military developments. Iranian Football Federation President Mehdi Taj told Iranian state television:

 It is far from our expectations that we can look at the World Cup with hope.

However, a final decision has not yet been made. FIFA unveiled the official poster for the tournament on Tuesday, marking 100 days until its start, a move that underscores the ongoing organizational preparations for the edition to be hosted by 16 cities across the three countries.

Iran’s participation in the World Cup remains contingent on developments in the regional landscape in the coming days and the unfolding of the current conflict in the Middle East.

Featured image via the Canary

5 min read4 hr

Speaking at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank on Thursday, Mahmood said new rules for people coming to the UK sit between the “extremes” of the Greens and Reform UK.

She also warned Labour MPs who plan to oppose her reforms that failing to secure the borders will result in the “nightmare” of Nigel Farage’s Reform winning power.

“They [the reforms] are not an invitation to the fairytale of open borders as Zack Polanski’s revolutionary Green Party demands, and neither are they the nightmare of Nigel Farage pulling up the drawbridge and shutting out the world, narrowing our proud patriotism into crude ethno-nationalism,” she said in a speech.

As part of the reforms, Mahmood announced that earned settlement would increase from five years to 10, arguing that living in the UK should be a “privilege”. 

“For those who come to this country and want to contribute to our national life, I am clear they should have a path to settlement and ultimately citizenship. But it is essential that the privilege of living in this country is earned, not automatic.”

The Home Secretary also confirmed a series of changes to the asylum system, saying that the current regime  “encourages” asylum seekers to come to Britain. 

“Today, seeking refugee status in Britain is more attractive than other countries in Europe.

“The five-year initial period leads almost automatically to settled status. This means refugee status is in effect permanent from day one. This fact encourages other asylum seekers to pass through other safe countries in pursuit of asylum here.”

The government is using secondary legislation to remove the “duty” to provide asylum support. Refugee status will be reviewed every two and a half years, down from five, and if their home country is deemed safe, they will be returned, following the example of Denmark. 

Today, 100 Labour MPs have signed a letter to the Home Secretary expressing concern about the new restrictions around earned settlement and refugee status, suggesting a significant backbench rebellion is possible.

It was co-ordinated by Tony Vaughan, MP for Folkestone and Hythe, who said: “We can change our immigration system for the better without forgetting who we are as a Labour Party. You don’t win back public confidence in the asylum system by threatening to forcibly remove refugees who have lived here lawfully for 15 or 20 years. That just breeds insecurity and fractured communities.”

Mahmood announced that migrants seeking settlement must have a clean criminal record, no debt to the taxpayer, a history of work and paying taxes and high standards of English language before they can settle permanently in Britain.

She said that some migrants will be able to qualify for settlement “at or earlier than five years”, including public servants like doctors and nurses, and argued that failing to act would see a “£10bn drain on our public finances”.  

“That figure will be paid for by working people in this country. It will mean ever longer waits for three million people in this country on social housing lists and yet more pressure on our National Health Service. It is an affront to the idea of fairness in our migration system.”

Under the Home Secretary’s plans, families of failed asylum seekers will be paid up to £40,000 to leave the UK voluntarily within seven days or face forced removal. 

Around 150 families are expected to take part in a trial of this policy, with the aim of rolling it out more widely to save up to £20m. 

Mahmood also announced new safe and legal routes, including a “student refugee route” with the first arrivals in autumn 2027. 

“This will be the first in a series of new safe and legal routes, which will include a new work route and the expansion of community sponsorship.”

Mahmood also confirmed that she is suspending visa routes to four countries, Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Sudan, where abuse of visas “has been unacceptably high”.

Labour’s historic defeat to the Greens at last week’s Gorton and Denton by-election, which saw Keir Starmer’s party fall to third place in a seat it had controlled for over a century, has prompted calls by many Labour MPs for the government to be more progressive to help win back voters.

Some Labour MPs had wanted the government to dilute its planned package of reforms to the immigration system as a way of appealing to more left-wing voters.

However, Mahmood argued that the current asylum system is “eroding trust” with voters, and said that restoring order at the borders is necessary, “not a betrayal” of Labour values. 

“Hard-working people across this country engage in the daily struggle to make ends meet.

“They see a state that they pay taxes towards, yet it is unable to stop the flow of dinghies across the channel. They see a state that is paying billions towards hotels. It doesn’t look fair because it’s not fair, and it erodes their trust in government.”

She added: “It is our creed as a Labour Party that the states can and must be a force for good. Without the trust of citizens in the state, there is no space for Labour values in any part of government to be realised.

“Restoring order and control at the border is not a betrayal of Labour values; it is the necessary condition for a Labour government to achieve anything it hopes to.”

The lead negotiator from Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal told Sky News that there is no way Iran could have been two weeks away from developing a nuclear bomb.

‘This is not intelligence, this is fabrication’

Robert Malley, the lead negotiator on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, tells @SkyYaldaHakim: ‘There’s no way that Iran would have been two weeks away from developing a bomb’

Iran latest: https://t.co/fcwiwnqYSb

📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602 pic.twitter.com/zy4F7dLN2W

Advertisement

— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 4, 2026

He said:

It’s not intelligence, it’s pure fabrication.

He also said that Iran does not currently have a structured programme in place to build a bomb.

Then he added:

Even the most alarmist predictions before the 12-day war were that Iran was at least 6 months to a year away from having a bomb, and that was if they dashed to a bomb, and before Israel and the US had attacked.

It’s not intelligence, it’s a creation of American politicians’ minds.

It’s not uncommon for Western leaders to lie about their reasons for invading countries in the global majority.

So the serial warmongers and oil thieves lied again about their reasons for invading the country with the third highest oil reserves in the world? Very interesting list this. Seems to be a strong correlation between oil reserves & perceived threats from said state! pic.twitter.com/D02paVGBUC

— Lalo Escőbar (@razor5edge) March 4, 2026

Whether it’s lies about drugs in Venezuela, weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or now nuclear weapons in Iran – it’s all bullshit.

‘Fabrication’ folks. ‘FABRICATION’
Iraq weapons of mass destruction. Remember that? Did you fall for it again?
Are you scrambling for anything that might fill that gap in your internal narrative. You maybe suffering from
Donner-Kruger itis.
Your ignorance is murdering people. https://t.co/qlxB9Jccv8

— liam cunningham (@liamcunningham1) March 5, 2026

Zionists are good at two things and two things only – lying and playing the victim.

Not intelligence,it’s fabrication from Zionist mind https://t.co/54dNx92tNW

— uni 🕸 (@o1wa12) March 5, 2026

Israel has been telling us the same shit for years.

‘Iran is only 4 weeks 3 days away from nuclear bombs’ in 2003

‘Iran is only 8 days from nuclear bombs’ in 2018

‘Iran is only 2 months away from a nuclear bomb’ in 2026 https://t.co/YlAHcckaQw pic.twitter.com/YHmy1rraWY

— brown man (@AiemenRazieq) March 3, 2026

Of course, Iran is not close to building a nuclear weapon, like they haven’t been for the last 25 years. The US will take any excuse it can get to bully black and brown people.

We know – we’ve been hearing the same shit for decades. The US just needed to kill and bully ppl. https://t.co/HWz1Z738jf

— Oscar J (@OscarJ43943261) March 4, 2026

Iran is being made into Iraq 2.0

Remember when they told us the same lies about Iraq?

Well, that bullshit was made up by an Iraqi defector who wanted to bring down Saddam Hussein. The US then used those lies about ‘bioweapons’ to justify the large-scale and destructive invasion of Iraq.

Remember this?
“[Intelligence] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes.” https://t.co/WbQxrJ2viS

— gathara (@gathara) March 5, 2026

Advertisement

They use the same playbook every single time. They’re not even smart enough to come up with something new.

Same lies they told about Iraq https://t.co/AljCnfVVsW

— Chris87 (@ChrisATFC87) March 4, 2026

“WMD” all over again https://t.co/njj9NLtTUg

— Shant (@ShantDotMe) March 5, 2026

How many times is the US willing to go to war for Israel?

Once again the US is at war for Israel under a fake claim of weapons of mass destruction. https://t.co/O6zdJC7ivw

— Frank Wright (@frankwrighter) March 4, 2026

And why are we even surprised a pedophile is lying again?

So pedophile President @realDonaldTrump lied again https://t.co/HWQjvRI7zb

— Paul Dowson (@PaulDowson89788) March 5, 2026

Trump is full of shit. So is Netanyahu – and whilst some people are starting to see through the repeated lies and fabrications, a large proportion of the West is still believing every word that comes out of their genocidal mouths.

Of course, it doesn’t help that the mainstream media are parroting the lies of the US and Israel – but at this point, that’s what we expect. But until the media and Western politicians grow a backbone, nothing is going to change.

Featured image via Sky News/YouTube

Today, 5 March, home secretary Shabana Mahmood delivered a speech on immigration to left-leaning think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research. She sought to argue for the ‘Labour case’ for gutting the UK asylum system.

In amongst the now-typical guff about public fear over ‘uncontrolled’ immigration, Mahmood also slipped in a new escalation of her party’s racist anti-immigrant turn. Namely, if an asylum seeker works illegally, or otherwise breaks the law, Labour plans to remove support payments and turn them out of their accommodation.

Because a sudden increase in now-homeless asylum seekers will definitely reduce public fear.

Removing support

In amongst her boasts about Labour’s new visa pause and degrading refugee protections to a temporary status, Mahmood explained her newest plans:

So this government will today introduce new, secondary legislation which will remove the duty to provide asylum support, replacing it with a power to do so.

Those who require it, and play by the rules, will rightly continue to receive asylum support. But those who do not will have their support removed.

The generosity of the British people will become conditional on those seeking asylum following the law, living by our rules, and not working illegally.

Taxpayer-funded accommodation will be reserved for those who have no right to work, and will otherwise be destitute.

For context, we might want to take a look at why those asylum seekers are working illegally. After all, the home secretary has been banging on about how generous the government is with its handouts.

According to charity the Refugee Council:

So, asylum seekers will now be faced with a choice between trying to survive well below the poverty line in government accommodation, or turning to illegal work and potentially being thrown out altogether.

It obviously won’t work

Accordingly, the Refugee Council pointed out that this would lead to an increase in rough sleeping. As such, the cost of the accommodation would simply be shifted to local councils and the health service. This seems obvious, given that if you take away people’s homes, they become homeless people.

The charity’s director of external affairs, Imran Hussain, suggested that making asylum decisions faster would be “far more effective” in slashing costs. Again, this makes sense, given that, as Mahmood highlighted:

Last year alone, £4 billion was spent on asylum accommodation.

If only something could be done to make temporary asylum accommodations into a short-term solution, ay?

However, Labour aren’t actually looking to fix the UK’s broken asylum system. Rather, they’re trying to appear ‘tough on immigration’ in a futile attempt to court the far-right. 

Mahmood had the gall to state that:

And when fearful, people turn inwards. Their vision of this country narrows. Their patriotism turns into something smaller, something darker; an ethno-nationalism emerges. The idea of a greater Britain gives way to the lure of a littler England. And other voices […] take hold.

As if her party isn’t blatantly capitulating to that nationalism by joining in far-right rhetoric.

Swinging for the Greens

Speaking of which, the home secretary also used her speech as an opportunity to take another swing at the Greens. Because, you know, Labour genuinely have no other plan after getting their ass handed to them in Gorton and Denton.

A Green Party spokesperson pointed out that Mahmood was:

deliberately misrepresenting Green Party Policy and reducing it to cheap soundbites.

Now, the government’s website removes inter-party attacks from its records of officials’ speeches. This leaves us with some terribly on-the-nose lines like:

Our asylum system is [political content redacted].

It also means that we have to rely on the BBC for the content of the redactions. Fortunately, the state broadcaster informs us that:

Mahmood will use the speech to step up her attacks on the Greens, accusing the party of wanting to create “a world without borders” and calling for “the most expensive and expansive migration policies anywhere in the world”.

Hope is dangerous

The faithful stenographer of the state also helpfully points out that the Green website says it will “treat all migrants as if they are citizens” and “dismantle the Home Office”. It conveniently left out the other half of Mahmood’s creative quote:

The Green Party wants to see a world without borders, until this happens the Green Party will implement a fair and humane system of managed immigration where people can move if they wish to do so.

Fuck them for wanting to work toward a better world, am I right?

Mahmood’s speech today showed two things quite clearly. First and foremost, there is no depth to which Labour won’t stoop in order to try to woo the right.

And second, Labour is clearly rattled. Gorton and Denton shook them to the core, and they have no answers. The coming months will see more of this rightward swerve, and more desperate attacks on the left-wing alternative. And, just like the rest of Labour’s new plans – they won’t work.

Featured image via the Canary