Politics
Waltham Forest Socialist Independents putting community first as they stand in Cathall
Cathall, London — A week and a half until local elections on 7 May, and communities across the country are seeing the widest array of candidates from across the political spectrum. With protest votes, apathy and anger becoming the main opposition to getting engagement from local voters, independent groups are making it clear they stand ready and committed to fill this void of neglect in their local communities.
One of those groups is Waltham Forest Independent Socialists, borne from the Your Party movement, who have been hard at work trying to bring people together and heal local divisions.
The Canary spoke to Connor Rosoman and Susan Catten who are standing for Cathall Ward. They told us about how it has been on the doors and how local people are feeling in light of the area’s traditional Labour heritage.
View this post on Instagram
Cathall candidate Catten: ‘A woman said, ‘at last, a party I can vote for”
First, Susan Catten told us how local people are feeling about politics and how engaged they are ahead of the locals:
Well, actually, I have found it quite invigorating. We’ve had a lot of support. People resonate with the issues, for example, over housing, about stronger licensing laws for landlords, the issue about the lack of council tax support.
These things resonate with people on the doorstep so actually, although we are quite a new organisation and we have to explain ourselves. I think one of the turning points for me was when we knocked on a door and a woman said, ‘at last a party I can vote for’, because it represented all the things that she felt needed doing.
It’s been quite exciting.
Rosoman added:
Yeah, that’s right. The campaign has been really positive at this stage. So, I mean, the context of it really is that, you know, In Cathall, previously, Labour won 70 plus percent of the vote. It’s a very, very strong Labour ward. But the mood on the doors has been, as you’d expect, one where loads of people are really questioning who they want to vote for this time around.
A lot of people that have voted Labour and been very, very disappointed in the current government. And there’s a bit of soul searching going on. There’s a lot of apathy. I think, especially because, like Cathall, it’s worth kind of saying, it’s pretty much the poorest ward in Waltham Forest.
Waltham Forest is an area with some of the highest wage inequality in London, so it’s an area of extremes, and Cathall’s definitely on the poorer end and it has a lot of social housing. So, there’s a lot of people that are very disappointed, very angry and are either looking for something different or they’re just kind of like ‘oh well they’re all the same, it’s not going to change anything’.
Sometimes it’s hard to break through that a lot of the time. But then we’ve been able to come along and we’ve been able to say ‘we’re very different that’s the whole reason we’re here and we’re also trying to build something that’s rooted in ordinary people standing up for what we see that we need around here’.
That’s really broken through with people and it’s meant that we’ve been able to have some really good conversations and the response has been really positive so far.
Cathall candidate Rosoman: ‘Even if people haven’t heard of us, they’re open to us’
We asked both Rosoman and Catten whether Reform are a threat in Cathall. They then told us how people are feeling on the doors about the prospect of a Reform councillor getting elected, with Rosoman saying:
We’ve not had a lot of opposition, Reform want, i think, they want to think that a ward like this is the sort of place that they could stand and win, but they’ve not really got any ground. It’s a very diverse kind of community, lots of immigrants and so on who can see right through that so the response that we’ve had if it’s not being just like ‘oh well you know, i don’t care they’re all the same i don’t want to talk’
It’s been really positive I would say that if you know even if people haven’t heard of us, they’re open to us and they’re following what we’re saying.
Catten agreed, telling us:
Some people might be looking at Reform, some people might be deadly afraid of them. Actually, some people have said they’ve had some Reform leaflets, and they’ve just torn them up or put them in the bin. I don’t think I’ve actually encountered anyone who admitted to saying they would vote reform.
I think, you know, when people open the door and you’re engaging with them, yeah, they might say they’re voting green, but they certainly are not saying they’re voting Reform.
That’s not to say they won’t get some votes. Of course they’ll pick up some votes. But, you know, I don’t get the feeling there’s a groundswell of support for them. So, I don’t see them as a real threat.
And to be quite honest, on the doorstep, I’d much rather concentrate on talking about what we can do in Cathall should we be elected.
View this post on Instagram
Catten: ‘People are tired of the same old, same old’
Discussing the appetite amongst voters for a different way of doing local politics, Catten told us:
It is a new way of doing politics because, you know, it’s not the same old, same old, is it? The thing is, people are tired of the same old, same old. And so our leaflets, our approach on the doorstep is about, look, give us a chance. You know, we’re a fresh organisation and we are committed.
And we’ve actually committed a policy of not taking the councillors’ allowances. That’s something no other party has done.
But actually, when we’ve had engagements with people, I think people are turning around. At the end of the day, we are a new organisation, but we are enthusiastic, we are committed, and I think that comes across well on the doorstep.
Going further, Rosoman also informed:
We’re registered as Waltham Forest Independent Socialists. What we’ve been saying is that we’re a new local political party. We’re rooted in these different community campaigns and local trade unionists and renters. And that does resonate with people.
I’ll use an example from yesterday that I was, like, so energised by. We were talking to this South Asian family who’d been clearly politicised over Palestine. We mentioned Starmer’s support for genocide as just an offhand thing. Their kids started chanting ‘free, free Palestine’. You could tell that they’d been out on the marches and stuff. And I think this is something that gets missed sometimes. Their politics didn’t end at Palestine. Even if Palestine was one of the things that was on their mind, they would be political people.
And I think that it’s hard not to, you know, look at what’s going on in the Middle East, in Gaza, and not draw, like, conclusions about everything else. And so, you know, they started then asking all these questions about, like, what would we do about, like, social behaviour and crime, homelessness, and housing and all of these sorts of things.
I think that people do join those dots. People see it from various starting points, don’t they? People are pissed off.
Rosoman then told us about how, like many across the country, local residents feel like they’ve been continually lied to and let down:
They build affordable housing which everyone knows is totally unaffordable, it’s only affordable to those with money, and the people that need affordable housing can’t get it. People really resonate on what we’ve said about the housing crisis, and it connects them to these issues of community as well. Like, people struggle to stay in the area, they struggle to stay around people they know, all of these things.
And we’ve connected that to two local community centres that have been closed in recent years. One of them just stands empty. There not being used for anything, and we’ve been talking about, well, why not reopen that, so that we can actually use it and it can be part of the community and it can keep people together and kind of re-establish some of that social life that’s just been kind of crushed and atomized over the last few years.
These sorts of points i think really resonate because we’re connected to the local area, we’re able to talk about these issues that directly connect to people’s lives, i think that has helped.
Rosoman: ‘They really bloody hate Kier Starmer’
Labour will undoubtedly face a kicking due to their cruel policies and continuation of Tory austerity across working class areas. Moreover, Rosoman has encountered considerable hostility towards Starmer specifically within the local community. This can only underscore how unhappy people in London are with the Westminster political elite:
A lot of people are going to vote against Labour not just because of the local council but because they really bloody hate Kier Starmer, and that is also perfectly valid and it’s important.
If we want to send a message to Labour you know on the national level well, seeing them lose all these seats in the council elections is one of the ways that we can do that. That’s been something that’s really connected with people, so I wouldn’t say that it’s like just the local thing, but I think that we’re very well placed being the ‘new kids on the block’, as independent socialists, that are able to really connect to that.
Speaking of Your Party and local engagement in active campaigning, Rosoman told us:
We’ve been a really strong proto-branch, I think, from the beginning. And our election launch campaign, even, you know, a few months ago, had, like, 65 people present. And then, since then, last weekend, just as a standard weekend canvassing session, we had 11 people come out. A couple of weeks before that we did this mega canvas and we had 30 plus people come out so you know we’ve had a real groundswell of people that are keen on doing this.
We’ve got like a real base of people on the ground that are really outstanding local activists and that want to build something and are seeing this election as a chance to kind of plant this flag you know and so it’s not just because of the hard work of a few I mean it’s been hard work I don’t want to understate that but it’s definitely been this huge collective effort and the fact that we’ve really had something like fireball on the ground that has allowed us to really get around.
You know, we’ve hit every door in the ward now going back over roads and trying to get people that didn’t answer last time and that sort of thing.
And locally, there’s like a really strong tradition of organising. Rothenstone in 2024 was, you know, the site of those like famous pictures, right, when the far right racist riots were happening. 10,000 people from the local community turned out on Walthamstow High Street to prevent them showing up and that was just an out of the woodwork, groundswell of people.
Those are the traditions that I think we have in this local area and so, people will show up and they will fight.
The left vote is at risk of a split due to the Green Party’s national pledge to stand in every ward. Subsequently, this led to backsliding on electoral agreements made with the local Green party in Cathall. However, Catten emphasised how local people seem to have had enough of political parties and are particularly resonating with independent politics:
There are a couple of Green Party candidates, but they’re only paper candidates. They’re not really standing with any policies.
I think when we’ve gone out, our leaflets have been very well received because they’re quite solid. They talk about what we want to do, what we’re aiming for and what we stand for, and that’s what I think is doing us favours on the doorstep. People are actually responding.
Yeah, there are some people who say, ‘oh, well, you know. you’re all the same’, or ‘I’m going to spoil my ballot paper’.
Nevertheless, Waltham Forest Independent Socialists continue to push forward, as Rosoman explains while describing his conversations with local voters:
The point that we’ve been making on the doors is that the Greens are basically letting us have this ward. They’re not doing a campaign. We’re knocking, you know, we’re doing this big campaign, knocking the doors. You know, the main place to put your vote, if you want to stick it to Labour, is with us. If you’re in Cathall, in many other places, even our supporters are going to be working for Greens.
But here in Cathall, the only place that we are standing in the borough, we’re the campaign on the ground, and that actually really do care.
‘I’m looking forward to having some tense conversations with Calvin Bailey, if I win’
If elected on May 7th, Rosoman outlined his first priorities and areas he intends to specifically focus on in Cathall:
Yeah, well, I mean… I think I’ve mentioned a couple of these things – community centres and the Queen Elizabeth Jubilee Centre. It’s one of the things we’ve really tried to point out. But also, as I say, this rent issue is hugely important. And we’ve got this specific issue in Walthamstow, where the council has announced a £30 million overspend – they’re looking to raise council tax and cut services. It’s the same picture you see everywhere, right?
I think that because we’ve been able to build a groundswell of support on the ground and so on, we’ll be in a good position, if we win, to come in and start speaking up about that immediately. That’s not something you can solve overnight, obviously, but the point we’ve been making is that every time you’re faced with a cut, you’re faced with a choice: do you just implement it, or do you try and fight it? And you can’t just fight it on your own – councils themselves have limited powers to do that – but we’re not coming at it as just me and Susan Katz and the other person standing in the ward. We’re coming at it with connections to local trade unions behind us.
Because we’ve got all of that behind us, I think we’re really in a position to speak against that, to connect with other people throughout London who are facing the same sorts of things, and to try and build a movement around it. And Starmer is going to be in such a weak position, if he even survives these local elections, so there’s a time to put demands on the national government for things like funding to councils. The government nationally will be in the weakest position they’ve been in yet coming out of these local elections, and that’s the time to keep up the fight, rather than say, ‘we’ve just been elected, so we can take a breather.’
Yeah, I’m looking forward to having some tough conversations with Calvin Bailey, if I win.
We at the Canary recognise that growing appetite for a new way of doing politics in our communities. After all, it is surely the only way to ensure that local people are truly at the heart of local policy.
We wish both Susan Catten and Connor Rosoman the best of luck for 7 May and urge local voters to choose candidates who actively show their commitment to really challenge the status quo.
Featured image provided via author
The refusal to allow the Iranian Football Federation delegation to enter Canada has led to an escalating crisis with FIFA, after it became clear that Tehran would be absent from the Congress, the most significant event bringing together all national associations to discuss global football matters and take crucial decisions.
According to Reuters, the Iranian delegation was unable to enter Canadian territory despite prior arrangements, amid allegations of “mistreatment” by immigration authorities, forcing it to withdraw from the event.
In contrast, Canadian officials reportedly confirming that entry procedures are subject to strict legal and security considerations, given potential restrictions on individuals suspected of links to designated entities, which explains the decision from an official standpoint.
This development places FIFA in an extremely delicate position, as it is required to ensure the neutrality of international competitions and events, whilst facing a political reality that directly affects the participation of certain federations.
The event takes on deeper dimensions, as it comes against a backdrop of escalating political and military tensions linked to Iran, transforming the crisis from a mere administrative issue into a matter with political ramifications that may cast a shadow over upcoming football events — most importantly those hosted by Canada.
Featured image via IRNA
By Alaa Shamali
As we all know, things are looking dire for Labour in the upcoming local elections. On a positive note, however, they may do so badly that they end up winning a Guinness World Record:
“Anything north of 1500 seats lost would trigger a collective nervous breakdown”
Exclusive data from Lord Hayward suggests Labour may lose 1850 English councils in the upcoming local elections, the worst midterm results by any modern government#Peston pic.twitter.com/0JXXTLrYMk — Peston (@itvpeston) April 29, 2026
EXCLUSIVE
Labour: record breakers
First things first, we want to apologise on behalf of Peston for the word ‘midterm’:
why is the phrase ‘midterm’ eeking its way into British politics pic.twitter.com/BbFnJhER4S
— DX (@diggingmad) April 29, 2026
They’re not ‘midterm elections’; they’re ‘local elections’. In the American midterms, they vote for national politicians; in the British locals, we vote for local politicians. You may not know this if you watch the mainstream news, of course, because they refuse to engage with local issues.
The Peston team made another mistake too – namely by stating Labour is set to lose 1,850 “councils”. There actually aren’t that many councils in the UK, and what they meant to say was ‘seats’. In other words, Labour are potentially set to lose 1,850 councillors.
In the clip at the top, Pippa Crerar says:
I want to show you a projection by the elections expert Robert Hayward shared exclusively with the Preston Show which shows just how bad it could get. Now he predicts… that Labour could lose as many as 1,850 seats. That’s of the 2,500 they’re defending so pretty terrible prediction.
And you can see also that the Tories lose almost half their seats that are up for grabs, with the Greens and Reform the big winners.
This is the poll in question:
Peston asked:
Now, Heywood has a formidable reputation for getting these things right. Now, this might be an occasion when he’s not, but if it were 1,850 losses for Labour, Is that worse than Labour campaigners’ fears?
Crerar responded:
I think, in short, yes. I mean, ministers tell me that anything north of 1,500 seats lost would trigger a collective nervous breakdown in the Cabinet and potentially a revolt. And that’s obviously very dangerous territory for Starmer.
. … This comes, of course, on top of results in Scotland and Wales, which are also expected to be pretty dire for the government, the UK government, and that inevitably creates yet more danger for Starmer.
Things look equally bad in other polls too (albeit better for the Greens):
Median estimate via @Moreincommon_, April '26 pic.twitter.com/OFxPMxmoUV
— Stats for Lefties
Projected net changes for local elections:
Ref +1,437
Grn +926
Lib +327
Con -627
Lab -1,738
(@LeftieStats) April 21, 2026
Median estimate via @Moreincommon_, April '26 pic.twitter.com/OFxPMxmoUV
— Stats for Lefties
Projected net changes for local elections:
Ref +1,437 Grn +926 Lib +327 Con -627 Lab -1,738
(@LeftieStats) April 21, 2026
Time to go
At this point, it seems that Starmer has to go after the local elections. The only reason it’s not entirely certain is because this current crop of Labour MPs are so weak and directionless that they might just go with the flow all the way down the electoral drain.
Featured image via Peston
By Willem Moore
Take Back Power supporters have been ‘taking over’ the playgrounds of the super-rich on the morning of 30 April. Take Back Power is a nonviolent campaign, demanding a tax on extreme wealth, to be decided by a ‘House of the People’.
At around 10am, 22 Take Back Power supporters occupied a Ferrari dealership in Berkeley Square. They chanted “WE DEMAND EQUALITY!” and “THE BILLIONAIRES HAVE GOT TO GO!”. By around 10.30am the group left the store.
At around 11.30am the group reconvened at Burlington Arcade, the world’s first modern shopping mall. It positions itself as an ‘elegant and exclusive upmarket shopping venue’. The group held signs which read “HOUSE OF THE PEOPLE” and “4 MILLION KIDS IN POVERTY”. Door staff quickly seized the placards.
By around 12.20pm the group had moved on to the food hall at luxury department store Harrod’s. Security was much more reactive, dragging Take Back Power supporters from the building.
A Take Back Power spokesperson said:
This country is in crisis and everyone knows it! The people to blame are the corporations and super-rich who are extracting every last penny from working people, and then using their ownership of the media to distract people into blaming the poor and migrants.
Nothing short of a massive transfer of wealth and power away from the 1% and back to working people can hope to fix Britain.
One of those taking action today is Robert Pembroke, 43, a builder and dad from Devon. He said:
It’s time ordinary people take back our power from the super-rich. Inequality is spiralling out of control, 50 families in the UK hold more wealth than 50% of the country. Around the world, it’s even worse with eight men holding more wealth than 50% of the world’s population!
It is obscene to allow this, people are dying. We need ordinary people, taking part in a permanent citizens’ assembly – a House of the People – deciding how to tackle this.
Also taking action today is Ana Heyatawin, 63, a grandmother from Somerset. She said:
Inequality, which is being imposed on ordinary people by big business, billionaires and the politicians who work for them, is killing people right now. More than a third of people in the UK now don’t earn enough to buy life’s essentials.
We need ordinary people at the heart of deciding how to tax extreme wealth to begin fixing this mess. This is why we are calling for a permanent citizen’s assembly, with the power to tax extreme wealth – a House of the People.
Take Back Power is demanding that the UK government establishes a permanent House of the People – a citizen’s assembly chosen by democratic lottery, that has the power to tax extreme wealth and fix Britain.
Until the government makes a meaningful statement in response to this demand, the group says it will undertake nonviolent action to resist the super-rich, who are driving us towards social collapse. Donate or sign up to take action at TakeBackPower.net.
Featured image via Take Back Power
By The Canary
Israel’s government has approved the construction of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish religious school on stolen Palestinian land.
View this post on Instagram
This decision only formalises the systemic takeover of Palestinian land through illegal Israeli settlement expansion. It comes only months after the Israeli government demolished the UNRWA headquarters in Sheikh Jarrah, an agency that served millions of Palestinian refugees.
The school is set to be built in the heart of Jerusalem’s Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood, across 5000 square metres. It will include housing for hundreds of students and residential units for the teaching staff.
The bigger picture
The plan is in conjunction with Israel’s “E1 Plan”. This paves the way for the construction of thousands of settlement units between East Jerusalem and Ma’ale Adumim – an illegal Israeli settlement in the West Bank.
According to the Institute for Middle East Understanding:
E1 (“East 1”) is the Israeli administrative name for an area in the occupied Palestinian West Bank east of occupied Palestinian East Jerusalem. It’s located inside the boundaries of the large illegal Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim. Israel is planning to expand the Ma’ale Adumim settlement into E1, including nearly 4,000 housing units for Jewish Israelis.
Around 3,700 Palestinians live in E1. These are mostly Bedouins who live in 18 different villages. The residents pursue a traditional way of life based on shepherding. This is despite their limited access to pastures and markets.
The E1 and the Ma’ale Adumim settlement cut deep into the West Bank, basically dividing it into two sections.
It is part of Israel’s plan to take full control over East Jerusalem in Occupied Palestine, by cutting it off from the West Bank with a ring of Jewish settlements in and around the city’s eastern perimeter.
Israel is aiming to make an independent Palestinian state physically impossible.
The approval of the school means that the Israeli government continues to facilitate the coercive transfer of Palestinians from East Jerusalem through land confiscation, increased settler harassment and terrorism.
As miftahpal said in a post on Instagram:
It is yet another systematic effort to erase the Palestinian presence by reshaping the land’s identity and forcing out its indigenous people.
Israel government policy
Occupation and stealing Palestinian land are a core part of Israeli government policy.
In December 2022, in a post on X, Benjamin Netanyahu stated:
These are the basic lines of the national government under my leadership:
The Jewish people has an exclusive and indisputable right to all spaces of the Land of Israel. The government will promote and develop settlement in all parts of the Land of Israel—in the Galilee, in the Negev, in the Golan, in Judea and Samaria.
There are currently more than 737,000 illegal Jewish settlers living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. They have the full backing of the state – both ideologically and materially. They are armed by the government and protected by the IOF and the Israeli police.
Only this week, Israel has illegally ordered 42 Palestinians to leave their homes in Batn al-Hawa, East Jerusalem, by May 17, so it can hand the homes to Israeli terrorist settlers.
As the Canary previously reported:
These settlers only aim is to force Palestinians off their land, so their colonial settlements can be built there instead, and they do this by storming villages and terrorising residents, burning homes, killing livestock, and destroying crops and trees.
Currently, Israel is perpetrating its biggest expansion of Jewish settlements in decades across the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Settlements are illegal under international law.
Article 49 of the Geneva Convention states:
The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Additionally, the Hague Regulations [1907] prohibit the seizure and destruction of private property. This means that both building and expanding settlements breach international humanitarian law.
Apartheid, ethnic cleansing, occupation, and settler violence are all war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has been committing these crimes since its creation in 1948 – and the international community has just stood by and let it.
The world should be holding Israel to account – but it has not up to this point. Unless that changes soon, Israel will continue to forcibly expel the indigenous people of Palestine and import its own imported settler-colonialists.
Feature image via Middle East Eye/YouTube
By HG
Wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu has appointed a far-right extremist to oversee the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza. Caroline Glick, his ‘international affairs adviser’, will be working with the Israeli military and a fake ‘Muslim’ group to push forward the ‘migration’ of Palestinians from the still-blockaded territory.
Netanyahu: unstoppable war criminal
According to Israeli paper Haaretz, Glick has already tried to persuade breakaway Somaliland to take Gaza’s Palestinians, but was rebuffed. Israel rushed to recognise Somaliland as a state in 2025 as part of Netanyahu’s attempts to neutralise Yemen’s Ansar Allah. Glick also tried to reach a deal with Congo-Kinshasa, but was similarly unsuccessful.
Tonight, in New York, I had the honour to meet and sit with President Donald Trump at @ZOA_National’s gala, where he received the richly deserved Theodore Herzl medal.
No US president has been a better friend to Israel, or American Jewry. pic.twitter.com/U4bchfih1W— Caroline Glick (@CarolineGlick) November 14, 2022
Despite this, she continues to work with the US on Trump’s criminal ‘Gaza Riviera‘ plan, which requires the removal of all but a small servant-class of Palestinians to wait on the rich and powerful. Glick has held presentations and discussions with the US embassy in Israel. According to a leaked diplomatic cable, Glick wants to:
translate the Trump plan to a concrete action plan, assuming that Trump had outlined the vision and direction, and now it was up to the Israelis to develop detailed plans and begin implementing them.
Glick has written about her “One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East”. A ‘one-state’ Israel usually means Israel as a nation in which Jews and Palestinians have equality in rights and voting, as opposed to the meaningless ‘two-state’ plan advocated by some Israel supporters to maintain Israel as an apartheid ethno-state. However, in Glick’s diseased thinking, the term is cover for Israel taking the whole of Palestine for the ethno-state. Supposedly, moving out all the indigenous people ensures ‘peace’ in western Asia.
Glick also lobbied the Trump government to sanction civil society groups that opposed Netanyahu’s attempt to subjugate Israel’s legal system to his political whims. Netanyahu’s attempted ‘judicial coup’ provoked massive protests across Israel.
Disgraceful
Israel is working with a shadowy ‘Muslim’ group to sanitise its ethnic cleansing. ‘Al-Majd‘ claims its mission it to provide “essential humanitarian aid, educational opportunities, and sustainable development projects to Palestinian communities”. However, a 2025 investigation found that the group is run by Estonian Israeli national Tomer Janar Lind.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Former German international and Arsenal player Mesut Ozil has revealed that his public stance on the issue of Uighur Muslims in China was one of the factors that negatively affected his career at the London club, confirming that he was aware beforehand that this stance might cause him trouble, but that he nevertheless has no regrets about what he said.
According to comments reported by the British media, including The Sun, Ozil explained that his public comments in 2019 regarding abuses against the Uighurs in the Xinjiang region had professional repercussions, noting that “after that, certain doors were closed to him and he no longer enjoyed the same opportunities within the team”.
The former German international added that he knew that getting involved in sensitive political or humanitarian issues might put him under significant pressure, but he felt that using his fame to express his stance was necessary for him, even if it came at a professional cost.
The story dates back to December 2019, when Ozil posted a message on his social media accounts criticising the situation of the Uighurs in China, prompting Arsenal at the time to distance themselves from his comments and emphasise that the club does not interfere in political issues, before his appearances for the team gradually declined, culminating in his departure in 2021.
Media reports, including The Guardian, suggest that the controversy following his remarks marked a turning point in his relationship with the club, given the political and commercial sensitivity of the issue.
Featured image via UEFA
By Alaa Shamali
The Ministry of Defence just released a new video of UK troops sheltering from Iranian missiles somewhere in the Middle East. What’s that I hear you say? British troops aren’t officially involved in a war. Wrong again, as it turns out.
Here’s the video published on 30 April that shows gunners from the RAF Regiment hiding as Iranian missiles come in:
Raw, unfiltered footage captured on the ground as our troops take cover from an aerial threat in The Middle East.
In the past few months, RAF Counter Uncrewed Aerial System teams, operating Rapid Sentry, have been actively shooting down drone threats using Lightweight… pic.twitter.com/w2syFQZNHf — Ministry of Defence
(@DefenceHQ) April 30, 2026
They are there because of their ‘expertise’ at shooting down drones. And you’ll see that the images look suspiciously like a group of men at war. They paint a very different picture to the official UK government line about Iran. For example only days ago, on 28 April, Defence Minister Luke Pollard said:
The Iran war is not our war but I’m very proud of the way our UK forces have protected British bases, British citizens and British allies and partners.
Pollard was echoing the official, ridiculous and widely debunked British position that the UK was only involved in ‘defensive action’.
It’s hard to know if the soldiers under fire feel the same way…
UK stance — a mass of contradictions
Pollard’s comments also contradicted his own boss, Defence Secretary John Healey. Healey said on 11 April:
Even in this current conflict, the basing permissions that we in the UK have agreed with the US have been invaluable to their military operations.
At the core of this bizarre situation is PM Keir Starmer’s patently false claim that the UK is only involved in ‘defensive’ action against Iran. Because whichever way you spin it, this bit of wordplay still means the UK is at war with Iran.
Also on 28 April, a different Defence Minister refused to acknowledge that US flights from British bases at home and from Diego Garcia were striking Iran.
Al Carns answered a question from Your Party leader Jeremy Corbyn:
For operational security reasons, we do not offer comment or information relating to foreign nations’ military operations.
Permissions to utilise UK military bases by foreign partners are considered on a case-by-case basis. All UK operational support to allies and partners is considered in terms of legality.
Again, this is despite UK support for the US-Israel war on Iran being public knowledge — to the degree that it has even become a tourist attraction for families who want to watch US bombers take off.
It cannot be claimed that the UK is not at war, or is only at war in some limited sense Starmer has dreamed up. And certainly not at the same time as a government department is literally posting video evidence to the contrary. This patronising charade has gone on long enough.
Featured image via the Canary
By Joe Glenton
DAYS THE BUDGET IS LATE: 30
ICE WATCH: Gov. Kathy Hochul wants assurances from President Donald Trump’s administration that a very specific federal immigration officer isn’t operating in New York: The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good.
The Democratic governor sent a letter this week to Trump border czar Tom Homan insisting he confirm whether the reportedly redeployed agent, Jonathan Ross, is now working in the Empire State.
“If Jonathan Ross has been reassigned to work in New York, I demand that he be immediately removed and not redeployed unless cleared after a full, independent investigation,” Hochul wrote in the previously unreported letter. “I have no confidence that Ross can be trusted to safely interact with the public. Nor should you.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The notice is the latest effort by Hochul to place guardrails around Trump’s sweeping deportation policies — a push that includes direct White House outreach and expected legislative action to limit the reach of federal immigration agencies like ICE.
The two-track approach underscores how New York officials, including the governor, have been desperate to avoid a potentially destabilizing surge of federal immigration officers in the five boroughs, home to an estimated 560,000 undocumented immigrants.
The push also highlights how Hochul stands to benefit politically from taking an assertive posture against Trump’s immigration policies as she runs for reelection. The president rode back to the White House pledging to remove millions of people living illegally in the United States, only for voter support to quickly erode following the deaths of Good and Alex Pretti during January’s Minnesota crackdown.
A Siena University poll in February found 67 percent of New York voters believe federal immigration tactics had gone too far. The same survey found 59 percent of voters did not want to see more ICE agents flow into New York City.
Trump has dialed back the publicly aggressive deportation effort, but that’s done little to assuage the Hochul administration. The February death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a blind refugee who was left in front of a Buffalo coffee shop by federal agents, further inflamed New York officials.
“I have repeatedly stated that any agents involved in these types of incidents must be properly investigated and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law — not simply reassigned to administrative or investigative duties or shuffled to other states,” Hochul wrote in the letter.
Homan, who has become the Trump administration’s blue state ambassador following the deadly unrest in Minneapolis, met privately with her in Albany last month, and the governor urged him to not conduct a similar operation in the Big Apple.
To that end, Hochul and Democratic state lawmakers are also on the verge of approving a package of sanctuary-like measures meant to erect legal barriers around federal immigration enforcement in New York.
The measures would prohibit federal authorities from carrying out civil deportation warrants in sensitive locations like education facilities and houses of worship. It would also ban formal agreements between agencies like ICE and local police departments from coordinating operations and sharing equipment. And New York is poised to make it easier to sue federal officers if a person believes their constitutional rights have been violated.
The expected package of protections amounts to a sweeping blue state rebuke of Trump’s immigration and deportation policies. It also marks a change for Hochul, a moderate who as a local official two decades ago opposed allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain state driver’s licenses.
Yet some left-leaning state lawmakers worry that Hochul’s opposition to a strict ban on local police communicating with federal immigration authorities will leave undocumented immigrants exposed even as existing sanctuary protections will remain in place.
One legislator, granted anonymity to speak frankly, said the likely agreement is “really inadequate, arguably harmful, because her proposal would create an illusion of legal protections while still proactively permitting law enforcement to share info.” — Nick Reisman
FROM CITY HALL
FARE-LY AUTOMATIC: A majority of City Council members are pushing Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration to automatically enroll low-income New Yorkers in the city’s transit discount program.
Currently, New Yorkers need to furnish proof of identity, age, residence and taxable income to enroll in Fair Fares, which offers a 50 percent discount on subway, bus and paratransit rides for those at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty level.
In a Wednesday letter to Erin Dalton, Mamdani’s social services commissioner, 28 of the Council’s 51 members wrote that the application requirements needlessly keep people out of the program.
The letter, obtained by Playbook, says only about 370,000 of the city’s 1.4 million eligible residents benefit from Fair Faires, largely because many don’t know of its existence.
The city lawmakers, led by progressive Council Member Crystal Hudson, wrote to Dalton that the disparity can be fixed by automatically enrolling all eligible residents by using application information they’ve already provided while applying for SNAP, Cash Assistance, Medicaid and other city-administered public benefits.
“The City of New York has the information on hand and could easily enact automatic enrollment,” wrote the Council members, who included democratic socialist allies of the mayor like Tiffany Cabán and more moderate colleagues like Eric Dinowitz.
“Affordability is a top concern for New York City residents, and one in five New Yorkers struggles to pay the fare,” the lawmakers also wrote. “In short, we can help lower costs for New Yorkers by making it easier to enroll in the Fair Fares program.”
Asked about the letter, Mamdani spokesperson Dora Pekec said Thursday that the administration is “reviewing the automatic Fair Fares enrollment proposal.”
“The mayor remains deeply committed to collaborating with our city and state partners to make transit more affordable for all New Yorkers,” Pekec said.
Mamdani campaigned last year on a promise to eliminate fares on city buses so riding them would become completely free. But he acknowledged in an interview with POLITICO earlier this month that he won’t be able to make good on that pledge this year.
In the meantime, transportation advocates are ramping up pressure on him to find other ways to make transit more affordable. The letter from the Council members comes after a coalition of transit advocates earlier this month called on the mayor to usher in automatic Fair Fares enrollment.
Such a measure would likely come with a cost increase for the city-funded program. And that could prove tricky for Mamdani, who’s scrambling to address a multibillion-dollar city budget deficit.
Council Speaker Julie Menin, who’s in negotiations with Mamdani on the budget, did not sign Wednesday’s letter. “She doesn’t always sign on to colleague letters as speaker, but she is on record supporting automatic enrollment for Fair Fares,” her spokesperson Henry Robins said. — Chris Sommerfeldt
PIED-À-TERREABLE MATH: City Comptroller Mark Levine released a reality check for the mayor and governor, who are hoping to raise $500 million annually through a pied-à-terre tax to help the city’s ailing budget.
Levine found by using past proposals as a rubric that the tax would only reach those heights under the most ideal of scenarios. When factoring in otherwise eligible properties that are rentals — meaning they would be exempt — and pied-à-terre owners who would either sell or rent to avoid the tax, the yearly take-home for the city would be between $340 million to $380 million.
“As we continue to work toward budget agreements at the City and State levels, it’s imperative that government leaders, advocates and New Yorkers know how major new revenue proposals might reliably impact our budget,” Levine said in a statement.
The mayor’s office countered that the proposal is not yet fully baked, and that it will be designed in concert with the governor in a way that ensures it nets at least $500 million.
“The Comptroller’s report makes one thing very clear: thoughtfully crafting and implementing this legislation will do exactly that,” a spokesperson said. — Joe Anuta
VOUCHER FIGHT: Menin is playing to both sides of the debate over the costly rental subsidy known as CityFHEPS.
She joined advocates and Council members at a rally Thursday morning to urge Mamdani to drop a lawsuit fighting a voucher expansion — which the mayor pledged to do on the campaign trail. But Menin also agreed the costs “are not sustainable” and said a settlement the council has offered will contain them, while still expanding the program in some form.
“We have come in, with the leadership of Council member [Pierina] Sanchez and the advocates, with a responsible, reasonable settlement,” Menin said at the rally, where Council members and advocates chanted, “Mayor Mamdani, keep your promise!”
Menin declined to elaborate on the specifics of the settlement proposal since talks are ongoing.
The vouchers are already growing in cost at a rate of 4 percent per month, and the laws to expand eligibility — which the Council approved in 2023 — are estimated to increase costs further by somewhere between $6 and $22 billion over five years, according to the city comptroller’s office.
“We do agree that there has to be a change to the cost structure,” Menin told reporters at a press conference later Thursday. “We have been working very closely with the advocates on that. We have put forward a reasonable settlement, which is why we believe that continuing to litigate delays our ability to reach the settlement.”
Hochul has reportedly asked the mayor to look at the rental subsidies as one place where the city can find savings. Asked whether she’s spoken to the governor about the program, Menin said “she and I both agree we need to have cost containment.”
“We recognize the cost has grown exponentially,” Menin said. “I think we’re in a very good place on cost containment that literally contains the cost but also protects vulnerable New Yorkers.”
Mamdani has argued that if the city were to drop its appeal, it would be on the hook for billions in additional costs over just the next few years.
“Mayor Mamdani has been clear that CityFHEPS is an invaluable tool to prevent homelessness and support homeless New Yorkers,” City Hall spokesperson Matt Rauschenbach said in a statement on Thursday’s rally. “That is why our team is working hard to ensure that it is fiscally sound and sustainable for the long-term.” — Janaki Chadha and Gelila Negesse
IN OTHER NEWS
— COMMUNITY SAFETY: Advocates are worried Mamdani’s police reform efforts in cases involving mentally ill people may sideline the anti-domestic violence office at City Hall. (The New York Times)
— BOARD OF REJECTIONS: A candidate for an Albany assembly district seat is contesting the state election board’s decision to reject his bid after he was disqualified for allegedly failing to meet residency and party enrollment requirements. (Times Union)
— BEHIND THE BARS: New York state prisons are seeing a sharp rise in violence with staff and incarcerated people both sounding the alarm of increased assault rates. (NY 1)
Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
Politics
The Palestinian Football Association appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport against FIFA’s decision not to sanction Israel
The Palestinian Football Association lodged a formal appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on the 20th of this month, having exhausted all available legal avenues within FIFA.
This comes as an escalatory move against FIFA’s decision not to impose any sanctions on the Israeli Football Association or its affiliated clubs in the West Bank settlements.
Suzan Shalabi, vice-president of the Palestinian Football Association, told the Canary that the Palestinian Association adheres to international laws and regulations, but considers FIFA’s decision to be completely unfair.
She added that the decision to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport came after exhausting all procedures within the international football system.
Shalabi explained that the issue centres on the participation of clubs operating in illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank in Israeli domestic competitions, at a time when Palestinians consider these territories part of a future state, emphasising that the Palestinian Football Association is demanding an end to this football representation in Israeli Football Association tournaments.
FIFA — ‘unresolved legal status’
Last month, FIFA announced that it would not take any action against the Israeli Football Association or the clubs concerned, justifying this by what it described as the “unresolved legal status” of the West Bank under international law. This of course is not true. Israeli settlements’ legal status is ‘fully resolved.’ They are illegal under international law.
In a related context, Shalabi noted that Palestinian football faces a “dire situation”, particularly in the Gaza Strip, with the continued suspension of many domestic leagues, alongside growing organisational difficulties due to the fallout from the war in Gaza and the occupation’s violations in the West Bank.
In her remarks, Shalabi also noted that the visa issues faced by several sports delegations ahead of the FIFA Annual Congress in Canada had contributed to heightened tensions surrounding the international football scene in recent times.
This is the first time the Palestinian Football Association delegation has been barred from participating in the FIFA Congress simply because it was denied visas, reinforcing the theory that this is backed by Israel and with the approval of FIFA, which does not wish to be embarrassed once again before the international community regarding Israel’s flagrant violations against Palestinian sport.
Shalabi revealed that the Palestinian delegation had recently obtained Canadian visas to attend the FIFA Congress, and that the Federation’s President, Jibril Rajoub, would deliver a speech during the event in which he would outline all the aforementioned facts to the member associations.
Featured image via Amnesty
By Alaa Shamali
The famously smart and efficient Met Police took it on themselves to amplify a Tommy Robinson tweet for no reason anyone can discern. Far-right grifter Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) was waffling about the horrific Golders Green attack at the time.
The Met, in their infinite wisdom, decided to comment on 29 April. And in doing so they dignified Tiny Tel Aviv Tommy’s far-right rant.
The Met Police posted:
Our brave officers confronted a man they believed to be a terrorist, who refused to show his hands, who was violent, and who continued to pose a clear threat. Using only their training, courage and tasers, they detained him while he continued to try to attack and stab them. This took true courage.
Our brave officers confronted a man they believed to be a terrorist, who refused to show his hands, who was violent, and who continued to pose a clear threat. Using only their training, courage and tasers, they detained him while he continued to try to attack and stab them. This…
— Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) April 29, 2026
Maybe it did “take courage”, as the Met said. But the question remains… why is an arm of the British state amplifying arguably the most prominent fascist in the land?
The move left many people stumped. Some people thought it was down to a similar far-right ideological lens:
The fact that @metpoliceuk is responding to a Nazi, racist, white supremacist Tommy Robinson shows how NAZI of an organization the Met Police actually is https://t.co/43MUisxwnw
— Tired Millennial (@_me_I_am_) April 30, 2026
Academic and campaigner Phil Proudfoot was similarly flabbergasted:
Sorry why is the Met replying to, and amplifying, Tommy Robinson!? https://t.co/zLqnIQAFjn
— Philip Proudfoot (@PhilipProudfoot) April 29, 2026
Other X users reported that the Met were replying to other far-right accounts — like @inevitablewest — which had been commenting on Golders Green:
The Met Police are now replying to every extreme hard right account on Twitter X to gain support for the questionable restraint tactics of their officers on the offender in the Golders Green stabbings
They’ve also responded to Tommy Robinson
I asked them directly – no reply https://t.co/7pfF2aByJW
— Stop The Bollocks with Mirabel (@MirabelTweets1) April 29, 2026
Another speculated that there might be a Tommy supporter on the comms team:
Sorry what the fuck is happening? Some social media manager is clearly a lover of the car right and wants to give em some attention https://t.co/qpz1sEdPn3
— solman (@ChatzSol) April 29, 2026
A ‘disturbing’ decision from the Met Police
Green Party candidate Jamie Strudwick called the move “disturbing”:
Why in the fuck is the Metropolitan Police amplifying a known criminal and far-right agitator? This is insanely disturbing and needs to be looked into. https://t.co/WiU20IoIRg
— Jamie Strudwick
(@JamieStrud) April 29, 2026
One X user pointed out Tommy’s thugs regularly fight the police. Usually at protests, when the fash can’t get hold of members of, for example, the marginalised groups they loathe:
@metpoliceuk why are you replying to a repeat offender whose ‘boys’ are regularly involved in violent attacks against the police? https://t.co/gYiDTtSCnC
— Greg Herriett (@greg_herriett) April 30, 2026
For the record, Tommy Robinson’s relationship to the police goes back a long way. He seems to spend half his time in a cell… As fact-checkers from Factually put it, he has a:
long, well-documented history of criminal convictions across violent, fraud, immigration and contempt-of-court offences, and his legal troubles have repeatedly intersected with his activism and media activities; these cases have produced both criminal sentences and political controversies at home and abroad.
All in all, not a bad day’s work for the Met. They’ve managed to alienate even more people than they usually do in the day-to-day grind of protecting property, harassing innocent people and generally hanging around the city like a bad smell.
Featured image via Novara
By Joe Glenton
Question Time laughs at Reform pothole success claim | News
How Southeast Asia Can Safeguard Nature While Unlocking $2 Trillion Annually
Anchorage Digital Partners with M0 on US Stablecoin Issuance Stack
Manchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
US brings back mandatory military draft registration
Steven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Tech3 days agoRegister Renaming | Hackaday
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World5 days agoHyperliquid $HYPE Rally Builds Momentum as AI Sector Enters Prove-It Phase
-
Politics3 days agoDrax board avoid their own AGM, accused of greenwashing & environmental racism
-
Business7 days agoPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
-
Sports4 days agoIPL 2026: Ruturaj Gaikwad registers slowest fifty of the season, enters all-time unwanted list | Cricket News
-
NewsBeat5 days agoLK Bennett closes all stores after entering administration
-
Crypto World6 days agoMichael Saylor says BTC winter is over. Market analyst disagrees, says bitcoin was in a pullback
-
Fashion2 days agoKylie Jenner’s KHY Enters a New Era with ‘Born in LA’
-
Tech4 days agoWhy Blue Badges Disappeared From Toyota Hybrids
-
Tech3 days agoImages of Samsung’s rumored smart glasses have leaked
-
Entertainment5 days agoMariah Carey Slams Deposition Claims In Brother’s Lawsuit
-
Business2 days agoMost Commercial Energy Audits Miss the Real Losses
-
Crypto World7 days ago
Is Algorand One of the Few Quantum-Resistant Blockchains? Here’s What the Data Shows
-
NewsBeat7 days agoTrump threatens to review UK’s claim to Falkland Islands and punish Nato allies over Iran war disagreement
-
Business6 days agoJeanine Pirro announces closure of Federal Reserve building cost probe
-
Business3 days ago(VIDEO) Charlize Theron Climbs Times Square Billboard to Promote New Netflix Thriller ‘Apex’
-
Tech5 days agoMicrosoft to roll out Entra passkeys on Windows in late April
-
Crypto World2 days agoCFTC’s AI will review U.S. crypto registration applications, chairman tells CoinDesk
-
Crypto World6 days agoNvidia (NVDA) Stock Jumps 5% as Intel Earnings Ignite Semiconductor Rally
You must be logged in to post a comment Login