Connect with us

Politics

Water price hikes will impact millions of UK consumers

Published

on

Water price hikes will impact millions of UK consumers

In a move that favours corporations over consumers, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has approved price hikes for four water companies. This comes despite a cap set by Ofwat to protect consumers during the cost-of-living crisis. Notably, this decision mirrors past attempts by water companies scrambling to offset costs resulting from their failure to maintain critical infrastructure.

According to the Guardian, five companies appealed to the CMA for approval of additional price hikes. Four appeals by Anglian, Southern, Wessex, and South East Water were granted. However, Northumbrian’s request was denied. Their customers won’t face further increases. In contrast, the companies that succeeded serve a whopping 14.7 million customers. This signals eye watering hikes for millions of billpayers who will bear the brunt.

The rising cost of greed

These appeals came after Ofwat allowed companies to hike consumer costs by 36 percent by 2030. However, only 17% of the £2.7bn extra revenue they’ll generate will be spent on repairing “creaking networks of pipes, sewers, and reservoirs.

Advertisement

Instead of cutting obscene bonuses to cover “shortfalls,” they’re boosting profits while allocating a meagre sum to urgently needed repairs. It’s clear these appeals were just a revenue-generating move.

Prioritising profits while punishing consumers is nothing new for our privatised water companies, as Prem Sikka pointed out on X:

Bailiffs for consumers, bonuses for bosses

Calls to re-nationalise essential services have long been ignored by Britain’s ruling elite, under Labour and the Tories.

When water company bosses demand higher profits, the CMA grants their requests. This stark imbalance leaves consumers trapped and unable to ‘shop around’. Every hard-earned penny is shaken from them to line the pockets of shareholders and executives.

We recently wrote about the bailiffs sent out to chase underpayments and overdue bills from struggling consumers:

Advertisement

Overall, Yorkshire Water, Southern Water, and South West Water (SWW) made the heaviest use of bailiffs, when the data is adjusted for population. Meanwhile, Wessex Water hasn’t used bailiffs for over a decade.

However, other companies also made massive use of debt collectors on specific years. For example, Severn Trent sent bailiffs out 11,574 times over 2022. Even more egregiously, Southern Water instructed bailiffs a staggering 15,707 times in 2019.

Labour MP John McDonnell highlighted the fact that water companies have broken the law hundreds of times in recent years, with little real backlash. He said that:

“Only five directors of water companies have been prosecuted in the last 30 years. Contrast that with the thousands of mainly poor people the water companies set the bailiffs on each year.

The system is more interested in prosecuting families that are struggling to pay their water bills than the company directors responsible for polluting our rivers and seas while lining their pockets from profiteering at the expense of both their customers and our environment.”

Advertisement

These appeals are about to make things significantly easier for one water company in particular, South East Water, currently facing a hefty £22m fine for supply failures. We’ll be watching closely to see if and when the fine is paid. In related news, the Guardian reported that Pennon Group, which owns South East Water, is likely to face further fines for power outages.

In the end, as these appeals make clear, it’s consumers who foot the bill, while executives find loopholes.

Punished for the sins of water giants

The Guardian also highlighted growing discontent among the British public over the value for money billpayers are receiving, writing:

The decision could prove a political headache for Emma Reynolds, the environment secretary, after the industry’s ratings hit rock bottom last October amid record levels of sewage spills.

The pollution scandal has returned to the spotlight in recent weeks after the Channel 4 drama Dirty Business told the story of how private companies have been allowed to contaminate Britain’s rivers and waterways.

They also inform that Kirsten Baker – chair of an independent group who approved the increase – attempted to justify the decision:

Advertisement

We’ve rejected most of the bill increases water companies asked for but allowed limited extra funding where that’s genuinely needed, balancing concerns about affordability with the need to secure our water supplies and cut pollution.

A significant part of this extra money reflects market movements since Ofwat’s decision.

However, the Guardian added:

Mike Keil, chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water, said the increases “may be less than what these five water companies wanted but they are still more than what many customers can afford or will consider fair”.

“We’ve seen almost a tripling in complaints brought to us about the affordability of water bills in the past year and further increases will add to the worries of some struggling households,” he said.

Consumers are not a magic money tree

Inequality is now wider than Dickensian Britain levels, and it is undeniable that ordinary people continue to bear the burdens created by the failures of the rich and powerful.

Advertisement

Inequality now surpasses even Dickensian levels, and it’s undeniable ordinary people shouldering the burden – punished for the dirty crimes of corporate offenders.

People are stuck, unable to switch suppliers, a harsh reality for families struggling as costs spiral due to corporate greed. Ofwat is meant to balance the interests of consumer and supplier, but have been bypassed by the CMA, failing the British public.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

DWP fails disabled people in Access to Work scheme

Published

on

DWP fails disabled people in Access to Work scheme

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted it knowingly leaves disabled people caught up in Access to Work delays with no support.

Access to Work in tatters

We all know that Access to Work has been ripped to shreds by the Labour government. Whilst eligibility is being silently cut, they’ve also completely lost control of the assessment and reassessment backlog.

As I previously revealed on The Canary, over 66,000 disabled people are still waiting for Access to Work support. Alongside that, 27,297 applications were denied during April to October 2025, representing 33% of claims to date. That’s just 7,000 less than the amount denied in the whole of the financial year ending April 2025.

Whilst there is such a horrific backlog, many will struggle to work and could end up losing work. Surely a department that’s hellbent on forcing disabled people into work will provide some sort of interim financial support, then?

Advertisement

Timms admitting to more DWP failures

Lib Dem MP Dr. Al Pinkerton submitted a a written question to the department regarding the issue.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether interim financial support is available to claimants while an Access to Work decision is under appeal.

As helpful as ever, Minister for Disabled People, Stephen Timms, answered:

The Access to Work Scheme provides grant funding and is not a benefit, so interim financial support is not available through the scheme while an appeal is progressing.

Instead, he, of course, put the responsibility on the employer:

We always encourage customers to speak to their employer about workplace adjustments in the first instance.

DWP ignoring why Access to Work exists

This ignorant answer ignores the fact that Access to Work exists so that disabled people have equal access to work. If an employer has a choice between a non-disabled employee and a disabled one, they would have to shell out more to employ the latter. The choice is obvious.

Advertisement

It also means smaller companies will not be able to employ disabled people, because the cost to do so will be too high for them.

Last month Graeae, a disabled led theatre company, revealed they covered £198,445 in access costs. Just £86,800 of this was able to be reclaimed from Access to Work. The irony in this situation is that the DWP justified cutting their director Jenny Sealey’s support, claiming Graeae weren’t doing enough to support her.

This is convenient for the DWP when their employment schemes, such as the Youth Guarantee, involve allowing multimillion-pound companies to pay disabled people peanuts for low-skilled jobs.

DWP is lying about supporting disabled people into work

This is just another example of how the DWP is continuing to push a narrative of “supporting” disabled people into work, whilst doing sweet fuck all to actually allow them to work.

Advertisement

At this point, the department is actively hindering disabled people from working, then blaming disabled people for not working. But thanks to their disgusting rhetoric working, they know the public will fall for it every time.

Featured image via We are Unlimited

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump tries desperately to please both oil execs and Israel

Published

on

Trump tries desperately to please both oil execs and Israel

Trump’s illegal and unprovoked attack on Iran is having a massive impact on oil and gas prices.

On 9 March, US president Donald Trump tried convincing the markets that his ‘Israel first’ war was “very complete” and would end “very soon”. The problem, which he does not see, is that you can’t please Israel AND the markets at the same time.

Iran, meanwhile, is intent on placing full blame for the price rises on the US and Israel, and pushing them to the point where they seriously regret waging this war of choice.

There’s no easy way out

Since 28 February, US-Israeli attacks have killed 1,255 people in Iran and injured 12,000. This includes an attack on a school which killed 165 schoolgirls that media investigations say the US was likely responsible for.

Advertisement

The offensive has set in motion a new Israeli invasion of Lebanon, killing around 400 people, including dozens of children.

As one might expect from a country committing genocide since 2023, human rights groups have documented Israel’s use of white phosphorus munitions against residential areas in southern Lebanon this past week.

Trump, meanwhile, has been laughing about unnecessarily attacking an Iranian ship that wasn’t posing a threat.

The attacks and attitudes of the US and Israel haven’t just upended the rules of war. Any effort to resume negotiations would be meaningless, as Iran’s foreign minister has said:

This suggests that Iran wants to ensure an eventual ceasefire doesn’t simply provide more time for the US and Israel prepare for another attack. As author Trita Parsi has insisted, Iran will:

likely demand some significant steps in order to accept a ceasefire… [and] likely require sanctions relief and release of its frozen funds abroad

Iran’s position has made it’s position clear – it won’t take instructions or bow to the demands of these aggressors.

Advertisement

As foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has asserted, there will be a “quagmire” unless there are significant concessions from the US and Israel.

Advertisement

Catastrophe brews

Araghchi has clarified that Iran is “not preventing” oil tankers from navigating the important Strait of Hormuz, whose traffic the US-Israeli assault has impacted significantly. Iran’s government has just called for waters and territories surrounding the country not to participate in US-Israeli attacks.

Iran also wants diplomatic consequences for the US and Israel in exchange for full movement in the strait:

Advertisement

As Trita Parsi suggested, Trump is clearly feeling the heat and trying to calm markets and prepare a path to retreat that doesn’t make him look a total failure. He knows how unpopular his war of choice is, gaining support only playing well with far-right warhawks, including Israeli war criminals.

In the US, only 29% of people support the illegal war. US allies in Gulf dictatorships, meanwhile, are very annoyed because Iran has responded by attacking US assets in their countries. And in the UK, the right-wing Labour government may be dancing to Trump’s tune, but 59% of people oppose his war and 67% are anti-Trump.

Even German chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has supported the US-Israeli war, has said:

Advertisement

there is apparently no common plan for how this war can be brought to a swift and convincing end.

Trump’s strategy isn’t working, and won’t

Trump is clearly a mess. He’s desperate to end the calamitous war of choice as soon as possible – particularly because of the oil chaos. But he also hates losing. So he has been doubling down on his undiplomatic tough talk, which is unlikely to spark any good will in Iran. The US, he insisted, will hit Iran “TWENTY TIMES HARDER” if it:

does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz

He added that the US would:

make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again — Death, Fire, and Fury will reign upon them

Considering that the US and Israel are nuclear powers and Iran isn’t, any threat like the above is serious. But further mass destruction in Iran would only spark much greater resistance to Trump’s regime back home.

The more Trump delays in ending the war, meanwhile, the greater the cost will be to the US. And Iran is in no mood to keep costs down or make it easy for him. So he needs to make a decision. What’s more important to him: bringing oil prices down, or serving Israel’s genocidal warmongers? Because he can’t have both.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Politics and Arkansas BBQ with Gov Sanders and Jonathan Martin

Published

on

Politics and Arkansas BBQ with Gov Sanders and Jonathan Martin

Politics and Arkansas BBQ with Gov Sanders and Jonathan Martin

lead image

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ted Cruz, Tucker Carlson reignite feud over Iran war

Published

on

Ted Cruz, Tucker Carlson reignite feud over Iran war

Sen. Ted Cruz and conservative pundit Tucker Carlson are again trading barbs over Israel and antisemitism, as they renew their feud over the war in Iran.

“I believe Tucker Carlson is the single most dangerous demagogue in this country,” the Texas Republican senator said Tuesday during an antisemitism symposium in Washington hosted by the Republican Jewish Coalition and National Review, before promising to directly take on the popular conservative podcast host.

“I have seen more antisemitism in the last 18 months on the right than at any point in my lifetime,” Cruz continued. “It is being spread by loud voices, the most consequential of whom is Tucker Carlson.”

Cruz’s remarks come after Carlson belittled Cruz and other Americans who trust Israeli military intelligence during his podcast last week.

Advertisement

“No offense to Ted Cruz or all the other dumbos who are always saying, ‘we get all this actionable intelligence, it’s so important, we need [Israel] so desperately,’” Carlson said in the March 2 episode. “Really? Let’s evaluate the quality of that intelligence.”

The ongoing feud between the two leading conservative figures — both podcast hosts and potential 2028 presidential candidates — represents the latest flare-up in a major schism within the party and a likely proxy battle ahead of the next Republican presidential primary, when discussions over the U.S.’ alliance with Israel and combating antisemitism domestically could be defining issues.

Carlson, arguably the most influential pundit on the conservative right, remains close to the White House and buzzed about as a potential presidential contender, even as many Republicans — including Cruz — denounce him. And Cruz, who finished second in the 2016 GOP presidential primary to Trump, is positioning himself ahead of a possible run in 2028.

When asked Tuesday about Cruz’s latest comments, Carlson offered a curt response. “Pretty funny,” he said via text. “He’s running for president against me, which I find amusing since I’m not in the race.”

Advertisement

Cruz has repeatedly criticized Carlson for hosting avowed white supremacist Nick Fuentes on his podcast and not challenging Fuentes’ claim that the “big challenge” to unifying the country is “organized Jewry.”

Cruz has signaled that fighting antisemitism and standing with Israel could be a central part of a potential 2028 bid. “I don’t want to wake up in five years and find myself in a country where both major political parties are unambiguously antisemitic,” Cruz said Tuesday. “I think that is a real possibility, if Tucker and his minions prevail.”

The two have long held differing views on the Middle East — and have been directly sparring for months.

In June 2025, Carlson hosted Cruz on an episode of the “Tucker Carlson Show,” which consistently ranks as one of the most-streamed podcasts on Spotify. The two sparred over Iran, and Carlson said Cruz didn’t “know anything” about “the country you seek to topple.” Cruz, in return, implied Carlson’s criticism of Israel was antisemitic.

Advertisement

“You’re not talking about the Chinese, you’re not talking about the Japanese, you’re not talking about the British, you’re not talking about the French,” Cruz told Carlson. “You’re asking, ‘why are the Jews controlling our foreign policy?’ That’s what you just asked.”

In a subsequent episode of his own podcast, “Verdict with Ted Cruz” — which was the most-streamed podcast of any sitting elected official in the U.S. last year — Cruz launched a defense of his interview with Carlson, saying Carlson was “off the rails.” Later, in November, during a speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition’s annual leadership summit in Las Vegas, Cruz denounced Carlson as a “coward”; at a Federalist Society event in Washington days later, Cruz said many of his Republican allies are “frightened” to call out Carlson because “he has one hell of a big megaphone.”

On Tuesday, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who spoke before Cruz at the symposium, seemed to downplay that concern. Though he didn’t say Carlson by name, he downplayed what he called “so-called influencers” who traffic in antisemitism. “They are not influential,” Cotton said. “They are at least not influential with Donald Trump, who continues to reject their kooky advice.”

Carlson’s anti-Israel ideas — which are the main subject of Cruz’s ire — have garnered increasing support, particularly among young Republicans. The latestYale Youth Poll found that Americans under the age of 35 are far more likely than older Americans to think that U.S. Jews “have too much power.” In the last three years, the share of Republicans under the age of 50 with a negative view of Israel jumped from 35 percent to 50 percent, pera Pew poll conducted last year.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

GB News guest defends channels extremist views

Published

on

GB News guest defends channels extremist views

Thomas Corbett-Dillon, former advisor to Boris Johnson, was invited onto right-wing GB News, to say that the channel is not extremist but a lovely, cuddly, and “really, really impartial.”

Barely a breath later, he was confidently telling his white, male GB News panellists that the UK is suffering a genocide from all the migrants coming in, especially the Muslims. Not a single one of them disagreed.

Corbett-Dillon apparently he did a ‘Tommy Robinson’ and changed it to something posher-sounding. He even went so far as to suggest, with horror, that if white people moved to the Pacific and became the majority there would be resistance in the UN.

Perhaps he’s never heard of Australia or New Zealand:

Full of ***t, and wrong about Germany

Racism is not the only kind of shit young Corbett-Dillon is full of.

His claim that Germany has “basically banned all the right-wing parties” is nonsense. Even the neo-Nazi ‘Alternative für Deutschland’ is not banned, despite being classified as “extremist.”

Advertisement

The only far-right parties Germany has banned are apparently Nazi party successor the “Socialist Reich Party” in 1952. More recently, the “Königreich Deutschland” cult was banned last year, only after it had been caught seizing rural land and trying to declare secessionist ‘Branch-Davidian’ Waco-style enclaves.

GB News amplifies hate

Not only was GB News unbothered by his remarks, they were eager to amplify them on X/Twitter:

Corbett-Dillon, who previously went by the name Craig, may have been some kind of Johnson adviser once, but he didn’t stay a fan. He went onto Fox News to complain that Johnson had gone ‘woke’:

Media cesspool

And Craig wasn’t done with his claims of ‘genocide.’ After appearing on GB News, he went straight onto another panel to spout the same racist nonsense:

Mr McGowan is right – what an absolute cesspit.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Wings Over Scotland | Looking up at the stars

Published

on

A fascinating line from the BBC this evening:

The number of parties who got MSPs elected at the last election is… five. (Though in fairness there are now six, Reform having a single MSP after Graham Simpson defected from the Tories. The Lib Dems are even outnumbered by independents, of whom there are seven.)

Also in arithmetic news, recent figures suggest that Labour and the Lib Dems will have a total of 23 seats combined, more than 40 short of the number required to elect a First Minister with a majority. So, y’know, good luck with that, lads.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Unions, Green Party and housing groups unite for National Housing Demonstration

Published

on

Unions, Green Party and housing groups unite for National Housing Demonstration

More than 50 organisations, including national trade unions, tenants’ unions and the Green Party, have announced the National Housing Demonstration in Central London on Saturday 18 April. They’re demanding urgent rent controls and a new generation of accessible council homes.

In what is set to be the largest coming-together of housing campaigners in a decade, thousands of tenants from across England and Wales are expected to take to the streets in protest of the government’s refusal to tackle runaway rents.

Major unions the National Education Union, Public and Commercial Services Union, Fire Brigades Union and others are joining forces with the Green Party, the London Renters Union, the Greater Manchester Tenants Union, Generation Rent and dozens of grassroots campaigns from across the country.

Housing developers first, tenants last

Asking rents for private tenants have risen by 44% since the pandemic, while social rents and service charges continue to climb. The consequences are stark.

Advertisement

Around one in three renters now struggle to afford essentials like food and heating. 330,000 households are currently facing homelessness. Many social tenants face above-inflation rent increases, while enduring unsafe conditions and years-long delays for repairs.

Despite the scale of the crisis, Keir Starmer’s government is prioritising private housing developers and institutional investors over working-class renters.

Instead of introducing rent controls or launching a serious programme of council housebuilding, ministers are focusing on market-rate developments. But these remain out of reach for those in greatest need and would fail to reverse recent price hikes.

The result is a system where working-class tenants are priced out and pushed into temporary housing while luxury flats rise in their neighbourhoods.

Advertisement

A united front on 18 April

On Saturday 18 April, tenants, trade unionists and housing activists will gather in central London to demand:

  • Immediate rent controls.
  • Mass investment in accessible and good-quality council homes.

Elyem Chej, spokesperson for London Renters Union, said:

Tenants need an alternative to our rigged housing system. Soaring rents are pushing us into poverty and out of our neighbourhoods while corporate giants build luxury flats we can’t afford.

Keir Starmer’s government is making the housing crisis worse, putting developer profits before our communities. That’s why unions and grassroots groups nationwide are uniting for housing justice on 18 April.

Rent controls would cut rents now and give ordinary people more control over our lives and our homes.

We had these rights before. Now it’s time for renters to take them back.

Advertisement

Grace Brown, spokesperson for Greater Manchester Tenants Union, said:

Tenants are in crisis. Areas of Greater Manchester have seen rents increase by more than 50% since 2016, and the developer-led investment model followed in our city, like many others, is hollowing out communities beyond recognition.

Across Greater Manchester, tenants are organising against estate demolition, against rent hikes and evictions. We demand justice for every tenant.

Martin Wicks, spokesperson for Defend Council Housing, said:

The government’s strategy of planning liberalisation and reliance on the large volume private builders is doomed to fail.

Home ownership is not an option for the more than 130,000 households in temporary accommodation, the 1.3 million households on the waiting lists, and many more imprisoned in the expensive and often poor quality private sector.

Advertisement

Social rent council housing is the key to resolving the housing crisis. The government needs to fund 100,000 social rent council homes a year and end Right to Buy. Market mechanisms will never resolve the housing crisis.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour MP Criticises Jury Trial Cuts After Rape Reveal

Published

on

Labour MP Criticises Jury Trial Cuts After Rape Reveal

A Labour MP has condemned David Lammy’s plan to scrap most jury trials after revealing for the first time that she had been raped.

Charlotte Nichols accused the justice secretary of using victims as a “cudgel” to force the controversial reforms through.

The government wants to get rid of juries in cases where the sentence is expected to be less than three years.

Ministers say the move is necessary to clear the huge backlog of court cases in England and Wales.

Advertisement

But critics say the planned reforms, contained in the Court and Tribunals Bill, will remove a fundamental right while not actually solving the problem.

During a Commons debate on the bill, Nichols said she had waited 1,088 days for her case to get to court.

The MP for Warrington North said: “Every single one of those days was agony, made worse by having a role in public life that meant that the mental health consequences of my trauma were played out in public, with the event that led to my eventual sectioning for my own safety still being something that I receive regular social media abuse from strangers about to this day.

“But here’s the kicker, in this debate, experiences like mine feel like they’ve been weaponised and are being used for rhetorical misdirection, for what this bill actually is.

Advertisement

“The violence against women and girls sector haven’t had the opportunity to come together to discuss it, and the government’s framing and narrative has been to pit survivors and defendants against each other in a way I think is deeply damaging.

“We have been told that if we have concerns about this bill, it is because we have not been raped or because we don’t care enough for rape victims.

“The opposite is true in my case, it is because I have been raped that I am as passionate as I am about what it means for a justice system to be truly victim focused.

“It is because I have endured every indignity that our broken criminal justice system could mete out that I care what kind of reform will actually deliver justice for survivors and victims of crime more widely.”

Advertisement

She added: “There is so much that we can be doing for rape victims that isn’t [David Lammy] using them as a cudgel to drive through reforms that aren’t directly relevant to them.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

London Mayor criticised for endorsing racist stop-and-search

Published

on

Zoe Garbett outside smiling at the camera for a professional headshot

A sitting member of the London Assembly – an elected body considered the ‘eyes and ears of Londoners‘ – delivered a blistering critique of London mayor Sadiq Khan. They have described him as “part of the problem” when it comes to racialised stop-and-search powers. Notably, these powers overwhelmingly target black Londonders.

“Vital policing tool,” Khan claims

New research from the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and King’s College London shows black people are up to 48 times more likely to be stopped and searched in London’s richest areas. The study — based on 150,000 Metropolitan Police interactions —  purports to be the largest-analysis of stop-and-search practices.

Khan has in fact rubber-stamped these very practices. In addition, Green Party councillor, Zoë Garbett, has spoken out against these double standards from the London mayor:

The Mayor has called stop and search a ‘vital policing tool’ despite its disproportionate targeting of Black Londoners, which makes him part of the problem by assuming that stop and search is an inevitable aspect of policing.

What we need to see is the Mayor ending the routine use of Section 60 powers, decriminalising cannabis to stop low-level drug searches that drive racial disparities and providing transparency around the use of live facial recognition.

Advertisement

Excusing white people

The MOPAC found strong evidence of racialised policing. They found that police officers had used “vague” grounds to justify stopping black Londoners, compared to the reasons given for white Londoners.

Black people were stopped for things like clothing or simply going about their business in high-crime areas. In contrast, white people were more likely to be stopped for stealing or admitting possession of drugs.

The report advised that improving the criteria for when people should (or should not) be stopped and searched would reduce racial disproportionality by 11 to 19 percent.

Zoe Garbett outside smiling at the camera for a professional headshot

Commenting on this the greens councillor, Garbett said:

Advertisement

Report after report has confirmed what many Black Londoners have known for decades: stop and search is an inherently racist and discriminatory policing power.

This latest research simply adds to the growing body of evidence showing the staggering scale of disproportionate policing in London, spanning a wide range of tools and tactics.

For example, research I disclosed revealed that over half of live facial recognition deployments were in areas with higher-than-average Black populations, including Thornton Heath, Croydon (40%), Northumberland Park, Haringey (36%), and Deptford High Street, Lewisham (34%).

We also know that Black Londoners are 5.1 times more likely to be stopped and searched for drug offences than white people highlighting how cannabis criminalisation is inherently discriminatory by design.

Punitive policing

King’s College researchers also found that Black Londoners are subjected to a troubling 4,300 extra stops by police each year – almost one every two hours. These statistics are difficult to square against Khan’s sheepish support for punitive policing practices.

Advertisement

Across 24 London wards (districts) with higher racial disproportionality, Black people could be up to 48 times more likely to be stopped and searched than White people.

These problem areas include Ealing, Hillingdon, and Hackney, where Garbett serves as a councillor for the Dalston ward.

She spoke about the human impact of these discriminatory practices, sanctioned by the mayor.

Constituents and community groups I’ve spoken to describe stop and search as an invasive and degrading tactic and they say it causes real and long-lasting harm that undermines trust and confidence in the police.

What we need is for the Met to genuinely listen to communities and take on board their input and act on it rather than pushing back or assuming they know better.

Advertisement

This is not the first time the Met Police have been called racist, with the studies and receipts backing up these claims. Despite Khan’s praise of London as a diverse “place for everyone,” he remains impotent in face of the Met police’s systemic and institutional racism.

 Featured image via Unsplash/Ethan Wilkinson

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

WATCH: Darren Jones Gives Live Demonstration of How StarmerCard Would Work

Published

on

WATCH: Darren Jones Gives Live Demonstration of How StarmerCard Would Work

Speaking at the usual Downing Street briefing room, Darren Jones is debuting Digital ID. Hope that goes well…

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025