It makes for particularly interesting reading alongside comments made earlier this month by the Prevent assistant commissioner, Laurence Taylor. He claimed the counter-terrorism scheme was being overwhelmed by a massive influx of referrals.

Trends indicate that Prevent will receive more than 10,000 referrals in 2026, representing a 33% increase compared to 2024. However, Taylor argued that this doesn’t necessarily represent an uptick in the radical ideologies that Prevent was (nominally) set up to combat.

In fact, the majority of these referrals are apparently unrelated to extremist ideologies. Instead, they’re issued over concerns about people becoming interested in violence. As such, Taylor claimed that Prevent’s time is being wasted, leaving it less able to deal with actual threats.

We at the Canary phrased this another way:

That is, the UK has invested so much in the very idea that (Muslim) terrorism is the greatest threat to our safety that we’ve actively started to damage the capacity to respond to non-terror threats.

The Southport inquiry report has only added weight to that assertion.

‘Referrals ought to have been made’

The report’s foreword notes that no single agency was willing to “accept that it had the lead role in managing the risk” Rudakubana, referred to as “AR”, posed.

One of several examples of this failure, was that:

Prevent declined to refer AR’s case to a Channel panel on three occasions when, based on the information that should have been known to Counter Terrorism Policing North West (CTPNW), referrals ought to have been made.

However, it also makes clear that Prevent was the most likely candidate to take the lead.

While Prevent, by the nature of the cases which it routinely deals with, would have been the most likely framework to be able to address AR’s risk, none of these three frameworks [Prevent, Working Together to Safeguard Children, Early Help] was by any means a perfect fit. The risk of harm posed by AR fell between their respective remits.

Rudakubana’s school referred him to Prevent no less than three times. However, Prevent never escalated his case to Channel. Channel’s aim is to provide support to stop extremist ideology from developing into criminal behavior.

The teen, 17, ‘had not displayed any extremist views’

Of the three referrals, the report acknowledges the failure to escalate the first as the most fundamental failure.

One of the main reasons for this was that, during a visit from Prevent:

AR had not displayed any extremist views, or counter-terrorism or domestic extremism ideology during the conversation. He failed to demonstrate any interest in politics or religion, and he had not revealed grievances against particular groups.

The report earlier states that officers had searched actively for evidence of ideological motivations.

It is to be stressed that the police searched for and were unable to find any evidence of AR having pursued an ideological cause, whether political, religious or racial.

Although he had downloaded an image of the Twin Towers and an academic paper containing the Al-Qaeda training manual, these two items were patently insufficient to support a suggestion that he was motivated by Islamic fundamentalism when balanced against the remainder of the material in his possession.

To the contrary, Rudakubana reportedly possessed materials mocking various religions. Among these, Islam, Judaism and Christianity, were particularly prominent. However, the report stresses that the “significant quantity” of “grossly offensive” anti-Islamic material was of particular note.

‘Mixed, unstable or unclear’

It would be easy to dismiss Prevent’s failure here as a one-off incident, but the report shows that this sidelining of non-ideological motivations is a pervasive issue.

In 2017-18, 8% [of] individuals referred to Prevent due to concerns around Islamist extremism or right-wing extremism ultimately received support via Channel.

The corresponding figure for individuals referred due to concerns about ‘mixed, unstable or unclear’ ideologies was less than 1%.

Advertisement

While there are likely to be many reasons for this, as we have seen in recent tragic attacks, the motivations of the terrorists responsible sometimes remain unclear even after the event, so we need to pay due regard to this complex issue in order to better protect the public.

After Rudakubana’s attack, Prevent referrals started to rise dramatically. However, more than 50% of the individuals concerned had no clear ideological motivation. In a Guardian interview, Prevent’s assistant commissioner reasoned that this was because there’s simply nowhere else to report these kinds of concerns.

On this subject, the Canary previously argued:

Prevent, despite ostensibly being set up to target all extremist ideology, has disproportionately targeted Muslims from its outset. In fact, hundreds of babies and toddlers have been referred to the scheme, overwhelmingly due to “Islamist concerns”.

In 2022, the Shawcross review even had the nerve to call for a renewed focus on Islamic extremism, calling the definition of neo-Nazism has “expanded too widely”.

Advertisement

And now, we’re being told that non-ideological motivations are falling through the cracks precisely because of the state’s obsession with terrorist ideology? And, in fact, we have no real mechanisms in place for concerns of non-terrorist violence?

The phase one Southport inquiry report has shown this to be true in tragic detail. Officers searched and questioned Rudakubana for evidence of ideological motives — Islamist or otherwise. Finding none, they failed to escalate his case further.

Beyond that, no agency was a “perfect fit” for Rudakubana, so none stepped forward to take the lead. Because he wasn’t an obvious terrorist or a case for social care, mental health services, or some other agency, he fell through the cracks. As a result, three young girls are now dead.

Featured image via Peter Powell/ AFP/ Getty Images

The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians has written to the director of world heritage at UNESCO. It’s to raise concerns over the recent raiding of Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied East Jerusalem by Israeli settlers, alongside far-right Israeli minister and all-round nightmare Itamar Ben Gvir. This came at a time of rapidly increasing religious persecution of Palestinian Christians and Muslims in the occupied Palestinian territory by Israeli authorities.

Ben Gvir raiding Al-Aqsa again

This follows Israel’s increasing attempts to consolidate total sovereignty over Al-Aqsa, which is the third holiest site in Islam, and is emblematic of Israel’s primary aim of Judaisation of Muslim and Christian holy and heritage sites across the occupied Palestinian territory.

UNESCO’s role in safeguarding the protection of Palestinian cultural, historical, and religious heritage sites is of fundamental importance in the face of increasing Israeli attempts to erase Palestinian cultural heritage, which includes its continued weaponisation of archaeology to appropriate Palestinian land.

It is paramount that the UN strongly condemns the move by Ben-Gvir to consolidate Israeli control of Al-Aqsa, his unlawful raid of the compound, and for the UN and UNESCO to immediately take preventative measures that stop the Israeli authorities from deepening its persecution of Palestinian Muslims and Muslim holy sites across the occupied Palestinian territory.

In his capacity as minister for national security, Ben Gvir has also indicated his plans for Israeli authorities to oversee the admitting of up to 150 Israelis or Muslims at a time in the Al-Aqsa compound. This move would place Ben Gvir in effective control of the Mosque’s affairs, side-lining the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf, which holds recognised exclusive administrative authority, including control over access, and has done so for 839 years.

It is also profoundly concerning that Ben Gvir’s raid of Al-Aqsa Mosque was permitted at a time when the site remains unlawfully closed to Palestinian Muslims. The compound has now been inaccessible for over a month, including throughout the recent holy month of Ramadan, raising serious alarm. This development sets a dangerous precedent, further entrenching patterns of discrimination and exacerbating the risk of religious persecution against Palestinian Muslims.

Freedom of religion and belief

Ben Gvir has also pushed for the Knesset to introduce legislation to curtail the Muslim call to prayer. Meanwhile, on the recent Palm Sunday, the Archbishop of Jerusalem was denied access to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the holiest site in Christianity.

The prolonged and deliberate restriction of access to Al-Aqsa Mosque by Israeli authorities constitutes a grave breach of Israel’s obligations under international law. Such measures amount to religious persecution of Palestinian Muslims and impose unlawful restrictions on fundamental rights, including freedom of movement, freedom of religion, and the right to practice one’s faith.

These rights are firmly protected under international legal frameworks, rendering continued encroachment upon Palestinian religious and cultural sites across the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful under international humanitarian law.

Israel’s actions regarding Al-Aqsa follow a similar pattern to those seen following the progressive Judaisation of the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron. In January 2026, Israel barred the mosque’s Palestinian directors and seized planning rights over part of the site, in contravention to longstanding arrangements.

Despite its administration by Palestinians and use as a mosque for more than 1,400 years, Israel has continually increased Jewish access to the site in its attempts to consolidate Israeli and Jewish sovereignty over it, increasingly so after the 1994 massacre of Palestinian Muslims at the mosque by a Jewish settler.

Órlaith Roe, ICJP public affairs and communications, said:

It is paramount that the UN adopts the findings of its own special rapporteurs and recognises the apartheid system that Israel perpetuates, including a system of religious apartheid that violates international law.

The safeguarding of Palestinian cultural, historical, and religious sites from Israeli appropriation and attacks is a duty the UN cannot afford to fail in upholding.

Featured image via the Canary

The Southport Inquiry has highlighted the “fundamental failure” of authorities to prevent the horrific 2024 murder of Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar.

Inquiry chairperson, Adrian Fulford, began the report, released on Monday, by describing the events of 29 July 2024 as “one of the darkest moments in recent national memory”.

The report concluded by saying that authorities could have prevented the murderer, Axel Rudakubana, referred to as “AR”, from eventually killing Bebe, six; Elsie, seven; and Alice, nine at Hart Space dance studio in Southport.

Blame was also attributed to his parents.

Wholly separately, therefore, from my view that the attack would not have occurred had AR’s parents reported what they knew in late July 2024, if appropriate arrangements and reasonable resources had been in place to address the risk that AR posed to others from December 2019 onwards, it is highly likely that the tragedy of 29 July 2024 would not have occurred.

Southport inquiry: Authorities knew about the risk, but failed to intervene

The report went on to detail the woefully inadequate actions of authorities, insisting that:

There was a fundamental failure by any organisation, or multi-agency arrangement, to take ownership of the risk that AR posed.

Despite authorities having sufficient information to warrant close attention, it added, there was a “pervasive failure to act on AR’s dangerousness”. This was “significantly troubling”, it asserted.

Agencies from social services to the police and Prevent, the Government’s strategy to stop people becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism, tried on numerous occasions to explain away AR’s highly concerning behaviour as a “mental health” issue.

This reflected a poor understanding of both ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder] itself and a misunderstanding of the ability of mental health services to ‘treat’ or address it.

It should have already been clear for all agencies from 2019 that Rudakubana “posed a high risk of harm to others”.  

In October 2019, he repeatedly carried a knife to his former school with the intention to inflict serious harm.

Then in December of that year, he took weapons with him to kill a pupil he perceived had previously bullied him, the report shared. Instead, another student was assaulted at random.

Fulford said December 2019 was a “watershed event”.

As the subsequent narrative will reveal, nothing occurred during the next five years to indicate that this level of danger had diminished. To the contrary, as time passed the authorities, with certain minor exceptions, had an
ever‑reducing understanding of AR’s preoccupations and intentions. Interaction between AR and the relevant organisations became, at best, something of a token.

The report also criticised the:

• Severe lack of attention authorities have paid to “online knife and machete marketing” and “inadequate…enforcement of the existing law”.
• “Lack of provision” at Lancashire County Council (LCC) “for violence fixated young people who have been excluded either for acting violently or for carrying knives to school”, and “the impact of combined underfunding and underperformance at LCC which saw no meaningful intervention in alternative education provision for AR for the final two years before the attack”.
• Long waiting times for expert diagnoses.
• The failure of Rudakubana’s parents to fully share information that could have sparked stronger action from authorities.

Fundamental change to fix broken systems

Elsie’s parents, the report noted, have called for “systemic changes in order to prevent similar tragedies” alongside the parents of other survivors of the attack.

They stress that the incident should not be viewed merely as an example of ‘knife crime’ but rather a failure by the authorities to prevent an individual who was intent on harming children from committing these crimes.

Southport councillor, Sean Halsall, added to this message. He told the Canary:

We need to make sure that everything that comes out of this inquiry is implemented properly and properly resourced, that things aren’t done half-heartedly, that it isn’t a sticking plaster but the fundamental change that makes sure we fix these broken systems.

A key reflection from the inquiry is “the amount of times that stage agencies failed the family and those little girls”, he added.

[These authorities] passed the parcel until the parcel exploded, and we’re here with the aftermath of three families who will be forever grieving the loss of their daughters.

Apart from building state agencies that properly support families and individuals in need of special attention, he also insisted on paying attention to how a young person can get hold of a dangerous weapon in the first place. He said:

For any teenager to be able to get hold of these things, it’s incredibly worrying and tells me that we are not going anywhere near far enough at regulating these companies that profiteer off of these sales, profiteer off of putting human lives at risk.

He added:

We can’t look past austerity and the damage to the social fabric that’s done with removing the youth centres and youth clubs and mental health support services for young people.

There are indeed many lessons to learn, as the inquiry has shown. To truly honour the memories of Bebe, Elsie, and Alice, we need to demand the government learns those lessons and acts on them quickly.

Featured image via the Canary

As we reported on 13 April, Donald Trump posted a meme in which he was depicted as Jesus. Because this is what Christians consider a ‘sin’, the picture provoked backlash amongst his Christian followers. This led to the following:

It appears as if Trump has deleted his post portraying himself as Jesus after facing some backlash from his own supporters. pic.twitter.com/9ZpWXBgL9L

— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) April 13, 2026

Instead of apologising, however, Trump has opted to insult everyone’s intelligence:

Trump just said he thought this image is supposed to be him as a “doctor.” pic.twitter.com/eECb5mTxO2

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) April 13, 2026

Advertisement

Trump backlash

To be completely fair to Trump, he is very rich. Maybe when he goes to the hospital, he is treated by robed doctors with glowing gold hands. You’d certainly like to think that sort of wealth could buy you heaven on Earth; if not, what’s the point (besides rampant and un-Christ-like greed)?

To give you an idea of the backlash Trump received, this is how MAGA responded on Truth Social – his own personal social media site:

Trump’s followers on Truth Social are calling him the Antichrist after his post of an image depicting himself as Jesus pic.twitter.com/6qlxjxt7AJ

— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) April 13, 2026

If you’ve never visited Truth Social, it’s worth knowing that it’s the most heavily advertised-to social media site there is. If you go to Trump’s profile page, you get three ads before you get to his first post:

You get two more ads immediately after his first post:

You then get another two ads after every subsequent post.

The reason we’re pointing this out is so you understand that the people who post there are willing to ignore a lot to demonstrate their love for Trump.

Now, these same people think Trump is the anti-Christ.

Which, to be fair, he very well may be.

Trump also lost the support of Knights Templar International – a global movement of divorced religious supremacists:

🚨BREAKING The Knights Templar Order and its ruling Council demand that this offensive and blasphemous image be removed forthwith !
We supported President Trump in 2016 and 2024 (NY Times attributed our support in 2016 to be part of his victory)
However we are deeply offended… pic.twitter.com/l4Ql0MFYXF

— Knights Templar International (@KnightsTempOrg) April 13, 2026

People have pointed out that Trump’s supporters are funny when it comes to what they will or won’t tolerate:

pic.twitter.com/1pS5uowksl

— 679 Enthusiast (@marionumber4) April 14, 2026

“Only the fake news”

This is how Trump excused his deadly sin:

Reporter: Did you post that picture of yourself depicted as Jesus Christ?

Trump: It wasn’t a depiction. I did post it and I thought it was me as a doctor. And had to do with red cross as a red cross worker, which we support and only the fake news could come up with that one. pic.twitter.com/7Y1u86GjkP

— Acyn (@Acyn) April 13, 2026

Advertisement

When asked if posted a picture of himself as Jesus, Trump said:

I thought it was me as a doctor, and had to do with Red Cross – as a Red Cross worker there, which we support. And only the fake news could come up with that one. …

I just heard about it, and I said, how did they come up with that?

It’s supposed to be me as a doctor making people better, and I do make people better. I make people a lot better.

As an example, the 11,000, I understand your husband’s going through treatment.

Advertisement

The woman he asked responded “yes, sir”, with Trump continuing:

He’s going through some very serious cancer treatment, so this goes a long way.

Okay, so is it better that he thinks he’s responsible for medical treatments?

Because he quite obviously isn’t a doctor.

In fact, Trump is shaping up to be the worst thing for US healthcare since Covid, as we reported in September 2025:

Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’… has made “deep cuts to Medicaid and Medicare” among other areas. It’s expected these cuts will lead to the closure of many rural hospitals (300 were already at “immediate risk” of closure in July this year).

People are mocking Trump’s excuses, anyway:

pic.twitter.com/iVOYT3O7eY

— devon sawa (@DevonESawa) April 14, 2026

IS THERE A DOCTOR ON BOARD? pic.twitter.com/kYSpcVlEDC

— Britton Taylor (@brittontaylor) April 13, 2026

Secular Talk’s Kyle Kulinski, meanwhile, offered a more honest version of the original meme:

pic.twitter.com/8wo8ZiQIEQ

— Secular Talk ([email protected]) (@KyleKulinski) April 14, 2026

One nation under Trump

Trump’s war with Pope Leo has also continued, with JD Vance speaking out on behalf of his boss:

JD Vance advises the Vatican to stay out of US politics pic.twitter.com/s2SJTntivP

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 13, 2026

Advertisement

As he literally just depicted himself as Christ for political purposes, Trump isn’t best placed to ask religious figures to stay out of politics.

Featured image via Fox News

According to London Centric’s Jim Waterson, the Sun is in dire straits:

The Sun’s accounts are out and I haven’t seen anyone report on them so…*Pre-tax loss of £31m*Revenue down from £296m to £273m (Sub now in the same ballpark as the Guardian)*Phone hacking costs (now into its third decade) of £36.6m*Big fall in audience but still claim to be UK’s number one brand

— Jim Waterson (@jim.londoncentric.media) 2026-04-14T05:37:11.975Z

Of course, none of this means the rag is at risk of shutting down. As we all know, the Sun doesn’t exist to publish news or even make money; it exists to bully politicians into listening to owner Rupert Murdoch.

The Sun is a propaganda paper

Over on X/Twitter, the popular Flying Rodent account asked the following:

It’s been a long time since the Sun made a profit, which raises questions like “what is the paper’s actual purpose, if it isn’t for making money”.

As Waterson noted, the Sun has incurred phone hacking costs of £36.6m. This substantial figure makes it abundantly clear that something is not right in media land. Despite this, political scrutiny on the matter has dried up.

As we reported in November 2025:

The Sun newspaper has yet again agreed to pay through the nose because of its past reporting. In this instance, they’ve apologised to Christopher Jefferies and paid him “substantial damages”.

Despite this happening fairly frequently, Keir Starmer has abandoned completing the Leveson 2 inquiry into press standards. It would be pretty awkward if he didn’t, of course, given the fact that he occasionally writes for the Sun now.

Starmer began his Labour leadership campaign with a promise to never speak to the Sun. He would betray that promise as soon as he could, jumping into bed with the Sun at the first available opportunity.

He did this despite how unpopular the tabloid has always been with Labour members. Now, Labour have found themselves having to draft national MPs to canvass for London councils in the local elections because so many of their activists have moved on:

So hardly any volunteers left in Labour, they’re having to press gang MPs to save their council seats in London. This has been a long time coming. https://t.co/mfF8POIjec

— Cllr Alastair Binnie-Lubbock 💚🌍 🍉 (he/they) (@alastairis) April 10, 2026

The point we’re making is that it was never in Starmer’s political interests to ally himself with the Sun. Presumably, he felt like he would suffer more damage if he spurned the Murdoch rag. This ended up proving false, but it still demonstrates how well trained our politicians have become by the Sun.

Turning the page

We’re now in a moment where the British press aren’t just failing financially. The Greens have overtaken Labour in the polls, and leader Zack Polanski has shown you can stand up to the tabloids without suffering political consequences. If anything, it seems that pushing back against the billionaire-owned media is viewed as a selling point.

That future: Lower bills. Tax billionaires. End Rip off Britain.

Who’s in? pic.twitter.com/O7WnMH45Rn

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) April 14, 2026

In other words, Murdoch may be happy to lose money now, but that situation won’t last forever.

Featured image via Hudson Institute (Wikimedia)

Climate change is no longer just an environmental challenge far removed from the stadiums; it has become a direct threat to one of the world’s largest industries.

A recent report published by Reuters reveals that the global sports economy, valued at approximately $2.3 trillion annually, is facing risks that could derail its growth trajectory in the coming years.

The report paints a clear picture of a sector accustomed to rapid growth, with projections indicating its value will reach $3.7 trillion by 2030 and $8.8 trillion by 2050. However, these ambitious figures are now clashing with the volatile reality of climate change, which threatens to transform growth into losses.

$500 billion at risk

According to the data, extreme weather events, from heat waves to floods and snow shortages, could lead to losses exceeding $500 billion by 2030, resulting from the disruption of tournaments, declining attendance, and disruptions to broadcasting and sponsorship revenues.

The impact extends beyond direct losses, reaching supply chains and the sports equipment industry, highlighting the vulnerability of the sports economy to any climate disruption.

The report reveals that the economic power of sports lies not only in professional competitions but in a broader system. This system is spearheaded by sports tourism, valued at $672 billion, followed by merchandise and equipment at $612 billion, and professional sports at $140 billion.

Ironically, the fastest-growing sector, sports tourism, is also the most vulnerable to climate change. It is projected to account for approximately 60% of revenue growth until 2030, placing it squarely in danger.

Outdoor sports

The industry relies heavily on outdoor sports, which constitute more than 90% of television broadcasting revenue and around 76% of sponsorship revenue.

This dependence means that any climate disruption, even a temporary one, can trigger a cascade of losses that severely impacts the core of revenue.

From local losses to a global threat: The figures paint a clearer picture of the crisis, with estimates suggesting that bad weather costs community sport in Britain alone around $433 million annually.

Globally, losses could reach 14% of revenue by 2030, potentially reaching $1.6 trillion by 2050.

Featured image via the Canary

German coach Marie-Louise Eta quickly found herself embroiled in controversy just hours after being appointed head coach of Union Berlin, becoming the first woman to lead a team in Europe’s top five leagues. She was subjected to a barrage of sexist and abusive comments on social media.

The German club was quick to respond, issuing a firm statement on its official accounts, affirming that “the Union family stands behind its coach,” in a clear message rejecting any questioning of Etta’s competence based on her gender. The club emphasized that the criteria for employment within the team remain performance and technical ability, not background or gender.

Union Berlin head off ‘blatant sexism’

The criticism was particularly striking, with some users questioning the players’ ability to accept instructions from a female coach, while other comments went so far as to mock the idea of ​​male coaches losing to her. The club described this as “blatant sexism,” emphasizing its complete rejection of such rhetoric.

Eta, who rose through the ranks at Union Berlin, possesses a wealth of experience, having previously managed the under-19 team and served as an assistant coach for the first team. This strengthens the management’s confidence in her ability to lead the team through this current phase.

The new coach’s first test will be against Wolfsburg in the Bundesliga, a match with implications far exceeding the three points. It presents Eta with a dual challenge: doing her job on the field and effectively silencing the criticisms circulating off the pitch.

Eta will take over temporarily until the end of the season, as Union Berlin strives to secure its Bundesliga status. The team currently occupies a mid-table position, relatively clear of the relegation zone. She will then transition to managing the women’s team, as per the pre-established plan.

The affair, which began with a historic appointment, has quickly transformed into a true test of European football’s capacity to embrace change, amidst persistent discrimination and institutional efforts to establish clear boundaries: competence first.

Featured image via the Canary

Hundreds of anti-fascists will assemble at 11.30am on Saturday 18 April, in Manchester’s Piccadilly Gardens. They’ll be aiming to resist the presence of fascist group Britain First, which is coming to the city for a second ‘March for Remigration’.

Britain First is a fascist group looking to ‘remigrate’ people of colour and cut our already-failing state infrastructure by 50%. Their activities include harassing and intimidating asylum seekers at local hotels, attempting to force entry into the buildings, and organising transphobic protests in the town centre.

Resist Britain First brings Manchester activists together

In February, a coalition of community and left-wing groups from Manchester united under the banner ‘Resist Britain First’. This counter-protest brought in over 1,000 demonstrators, severely disrupting the Britain First march. It led the co-leader of Britain First, Paul Golding, to say he’d ‘never seen anything like it’.

This event, however, saw attendees of Britain First’s march take part in several racist attacks on members of the public, clearly proving that their platform is one of racism and violence. Nothing makes this clearer than the words of Britain First’s co-leader Ashlea Simon, who said in 2020: “English people can’t be black, English blood is white.”

The February mobilisation also raised serious concerns about the conduct of Greater Manchester Police. Officers ignored a young woman who raised concerns about fascist protesters threatening sexual violence. Anti-fascist protesters were also subjected to serious police violence, with at least three requiring A&E treatment, including one protester whose head was split open by a baton.

A spokesperson for Resist Britain First said:

Britain First’s march in February showed that Britain First are not the party of concerned ‘patriots’ they claim to be, but violent racists.

Their attendees engaged in multiple violent hate crimes, attacking non-white people they came across unprovoked and showing the nasty street presence of Britain First’s hatred.

Resist Britain First came together to show that Manchester will not allow the ongoing spread of fascism and hatred to continue on our streets. As long as fascists try to march here, the people of Manchester will rise up and oppose them to make it clear that they have no place in our city.

Advertisement

Celebrating that Manchester is a city united against fascism, the Resist Britain First coalition is calling for everyone who opposes racism, fascism and the rise of hatred to gather in Piccadilly Gardens at 11.30am on Saturday 18 April.

Resist Britain First includes:

• Salford Anti-Fascists.
• Manchester Feminist Coalition.
• No Borders Manchester.
• Young Struggle Manchester.
• Red Roots Collective.
• RS21 Manchester.
• Northern Police Monitoring Project.
• Anti-Fascist Action Manchester.
• Manchester Trans Liberation Assembly.
• South Asian Liberation Movement.
• Migrant Justice Manchester.

Fenna, from the Resist Britain First coalition, says:

As the child of a migrant, I am proud to live in a multiracial, working-class, and radical city like Manchester. We showed the fascists that they weren’t welcome in February, and we’ll show them again. Let’s all Resist Britain First.

Jai, from the Resist Britain First coalition, says:

The fascists like to pretend they represent us, but they don’t. I’m working class and proud to be part of the whole working class: that means people of all races and ethnicities. This April, we’ll show fascists Britain First exactly how class unity is the best defence against their racism and fascism.

Featured image via Resist Britain First

The 2026 FIFA World Cup represents an unprecedented economic milestone in the history of global tournaments, with total revenues expected to exceed $80 billion. This is driven by the expansion of the tournament to 48 teams and the accompanying surge in fan engagement and investment.

According to joint reports issued by FIFA and the World Trade Organization, the tournament is expected to attract approximately 6.5 million visitors to 16 cities across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with direct spending approaching $13.9 billion.

This spending will contribute an estimated $40.9 billion to global GDP, in addition to creating more than 824,000 full-time jobs in the tourism, transportation, retail, and service sectors.

The tournament kicks off on June 11 at the Azteca Stadium, with 104 matches scheduled – a historic first that reflects the scale of FIFA’s expansion.

US World Cup is money-making enterprise

Despite the shared nature of the event, the United States is projected to capture the largest share of the economic benefits, with an expected output of $17.2 billion, in addition to $3.4 billion in tax revenue and the creation of approximately 185,000 jobs.

Los Angeles stands out as one of the biggest beneficiaries, expected to generate $594 million from hosting eight games, surpassing the figures from Super Bowl 2022.

Meanwhile, the New York-New Jersey area will host the final on July 19.

High costs for fans

On the other hand, the tournament presents increasing financial challenges for fans, given the rising costs of travel, accommodation, and tickets. The average daily expenditure for an international visitor is estimated at $416, with an average stay of 12 days.

In Los Angeles, hotel prices are expected to jump by up to 90%, reaching approximately $480 per night, compared to normal rates.

The “dynamic pricing” system adopted by FIFA also contributes to raising ticket prices according to demand. Tickets for group stage matches start at around $700, while premium tickets for the final exceeded $10,000 during the final stages of sales.

While the 2026 World Cup represents a massive economic leap for the host countries, it also raises questions about the ability of fans to keep up with the escalating costs, which could reshape fan attendance at one of the world’s biggest sporting events.

In this context, FIFA President Gianni Infantino affirmed that this edition “will be the biggest in the tournament’s history, not only in terms of sporting impact, but also in terms of global economic impact,” noting that the World Cup represents “a real engine for growth, job creation, and strengthening interconnectedness between economies.”

Featured image via the Canary