Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Zia Yusuf Embarrasses Robert Jenrick With Public Correction

Published

on

Zia Yusuf Embarrasses Robert Jenrick With Public Correction

Zia Yusuf has publicly accused Reform UK MP Robert Jenrick of falsely representing the party’s deportation policies.

Yusuf, Reform’s home affairs spokesperson, corrected his colleague on X by responding to a clip of Jenrick’s Sunday appearance on Sky News.

The MP for Newark and the party’s Treasury spokesperson told presenter Trevor Phillips that a foreign national would not be deported “exclusively” if they live in social housing under a Reform government.

Jenrick – who used to be the immigration minister under the Tories – said: “If they fail to meet our criteria because they’re not in work, or they’re not working as many hours, not earning enough money, then they won’t be able to renew their work visa because IRL [indefinite leave to remain] won’t exist and they’ll be asked to leave.”

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Yusuf – who is not an MP – hit back at the clip on X: “Robert’s answer is not Reform policy.

“As the person responsible for our deportation plan I want ensure people know where we stand: If a foreign national lives in social housing at taxpayer expense, they automatically fail our economic test and will be deported.”

Immigration minister Mike Tapp accused Reform’s front bench of “squabbling”.

He wrote on social media: “Reform don’t have a plan and while they squabble amongst themselves, the government is actually bringing down immigration.

Advertisement

“The Reform rag tag are in chaos, making it up as they go along.”

Yusuf’s clash with Jenrick comes amid growing scrutiny on the right-wing party.

Reform’s candidate in the Makerfield by-election, Robert Kenyon, has been widely criticised after his historic sexist remarks emerged.

The party are also at loggerheads with rival splinter group Restore Britain over fears they will split the right-wing vote in the crunch by-election.

Advertisement

Meanwhile Reform leader Nigel Farage is facing separate backlash after he took a £5 million donation from a crypto-billionaire shortly before running for parliament.

He is currently facing a sleaze probe over accusations he failed to declare the donation to parliament, though he has repeatedly insisted he has done nothing wrong.

Robert’s answer is not Reform policy.

As the person responsible for our deportation plan I want ensure people know where we stand:

If a foreign national lives in social housing at taxpayer expense, they automatically fail our economic test and will be deported. https://t.co/g7S7SmoDrJ

Advertisement

— Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) May 26, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Reform MP Accidentally Promotes Right-Wing Rivals

Published

on

Reform MP Accidentally Promotes Right-Wing Rivals

Sarah Pochin has been caught in a humiliating slip-up after accidentally promoting Reform UK’s right-wing rivals.

The Runcorn and Helsby MP was discussing the Makerfield by-election which is set to be a two-horse race between Reform UK and Labour.

It’s a seismic contest as Labour candidate, Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, intends to topple Keir Starmer as prime minister if he wins the seat.

One early poll from Survation for the Sunday Times found Burnham is on track to win with 43% of the vote, while Reform candidate Robert Kenyon will win 40%.

Advertisement

A further 7% of the vote looks like it will go towards Restore Britain, a splinter right-wing group led by ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe.

That has sparked speculation that the right-wing vote will be split when the Makerfield electorate head to the ballot box.

So it was unfortunate that Pochin had a bit of Freudian slip when she told TALK: “There’s so much going on with this by-election, it’s probably the most important by-election in British history almost, that we’re part of.

“And yes, it is a two-horse race between Restore – I’m sorry! Oh god!

Advertisement

“Between Reform and, oh god,” she laughed. “I’ll be sacked for saying that! Reform and Labour, that’s of no doubt.”

Reform UK declined to comment when approached on the rise of Restore.

Sarah Pochin(Reform MP) slips up & says the Makerfield by-election is between Restore & Labour.

“I’ll be sacked for saying that.” pic.twitter.com/GHO3cF3SGL

— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) May 26, 2026

Advertisement

Pochin’s comments come during a troublesome time for Reform UK.

Party leader Nigel Farage is currently facing scrutiny for failing to declare a £5 million donation from a crypto billionaire shortly before running for parliament.

He has denied any allegations of wrongdoing.

Meanwhile, the party’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf started a row with Reform’s Treasury spokesperson Robert Jenrick on X over their deportation policies.

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Migrants posing as children are pushing foster carers to breaking point

Published

on

Migrants posing as children are pushing foster carers to breaking point

As a foster carer, one of the first instructions we’re given in training is that we must not, under any circumstances, agree to collude in secrets with the children we care for. If a child I’m looking after asks me to keep a secret, I tell him or her gently that surprises are nice things to share, but secrets don’t keep us safe.

Yet when one of us accepts a new placement and the ‘boy’ joining the family has stubble, chest hair and a six-pack, we’re supposed to nod along. We’re supposed to accept that this physically mature, testosterone-fuelled young man is just 14. We’re not supposed to worry that he very likely comes from a culture that has vastly different attitudes to young women and girls to our own. Instead, we’re meant to simply ask, ‘How was your day at school?’. Any diversion from the script would likely be met with retraining, perhaps even disciplinary action. In other words, we are being asked to collude in a lie.

We sit there at the regular social events we organise so that the children can meet others in the same situation – a summer fair with a magician for entertainment, a barbecue with face-painting – and none of us dares pass comment that the lad on the bouncy castle looks like he might actually be someone’s dad. It’s only when the social workers are safely out of earshot that we might raise an eyebrow and whisper that the young man in question really shouldn’t be on a family placement, spending his mornings on a seat next to Year Nine girls.

Advertisement

I have no idea whether the 14-year-old Iranian placed in foster care in Bedfordshire last June after arriving via small boat was in fact that age, or whether he was merely claiming to be a minor to access the softer end of the system. What I do know is that three months after landing, he raped a 14-year-old girl, and then bragged about it on social media. The victim and her attacker went to the same school. He was convicted in January and, in March, he was spared jail. He was instead sentenced to a youth-rehabilitation order on the condition that he ‘learn about consent’.

We have a serious problem on our hands. On the weekend, GB News reported that 10 ‘child migrants’ under the care of the Kent County Council who were set to be sent to foster homes were, in fact, adults. An earlier investigation, also by GB News, revealed that thousands of illegal immigrants have lied about their age in order to be classified as ‘unaccompanied minors’. Even when local councils try to raise objections about the supposed age of migrants, they are often undermined by the courts.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Foster care in England is stretched to breaking point. As of the end of March 2025, there were 6,540 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) in the system, a decrease on the previous year, but still sharply up from the 5,080 in 2020. Unaccompanied minors make up eight per cent of the total looked-after population of 81,770, and two-thirds of those children are in foster care. Ninety-four per cent of UASC are male and most are older teenagers. Thirty-eight per cent are placed in foster families, one per cent in children’s homes, the rest in supported accommodation. Some older UASC are housed in hotels with social-worker oversight, and local authorities are breaking at the seams.

Meanwhile, the number of fostering households keeps falling, down seven per cent since 2021. Some might say foster carers have a choice as to whether to accept these placements. In theory, we do. But in practice, experienced carers are expected to take their turn on the emergency rota, providing 24/7 care so that when a distraught child is lifted from his or her bed at midnight by someone in uniform, there is somewhere safe to land. I’ve taken many children in those exact circumstances. Most of us are only too happy to help. But we have also been caught out, accepting placements that feel far too complex for a family home because, if you’re on the rota, you’re not allowed to say no.

Advertisement

Desperate social workers sometimes do what they can to game the system. I’ve refused a placement because a child’s needs simply wouldn’t fit with the other children in my house, only for a child with an identical profile to appear at 5pm on a Friday, when the emergency rota kicks in.

I became a foster carer because I wanted to help as many vulnerable children as possible. Increasingly, however, it feels as though we’re throwing the net ever wider, stretching finite resources to breaking point. There is something beautiful about a country with the compassion to wrap a stranger’s child in a blanket and offer them sanctuary. But there is a world of difference between taking in a terrified five-year-old and extending that same welcome to a strapping male who may be several years older than he claims.

The state has a duty of care to the children it removes from their birth families, to the girls across the country who have a right to feel safe at school, and to the foster carers who are burning out under the weight of unreasonable demands. The state does not have a duty of care to look after men who have arrived in Britain illegally and then claim to be children. Pretending otherwise isn’t compassionate, and we need to stop keeping secrets and say so.

Advertisement

We carers will keep opening our homes and hearts, listening out for the midnight knock on the door. But we shouldn’t have to pretend that every ‘14-year-old’ who arrives in Britain illegally is the same as the broken little boy who needs a mug of cocoa, a warm bath and a bedtime story.

Allowing young men into foster homes is betraying the goodwill and compassion of carers. We need another solution.

Rosie Lewis is a foster carer and writer. Read her Substack here.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Russell Crowe Slams ‘Clickbait’ Reports About Paris Hotel Incident

Published

on

Russell Crowe Slams 'Clickbait' Reports About Paris Hotel Incident

Russell Crowe has hit back at the suggestion he was “not having it” when greeted by autograph seekers outside of a hotel he was staying at in Paris.

On Monday evening, the gossip outlet TMZ posted footage recorded of the Oscar winner leaving a hotel, where autograph-hunters were waiting for him outside.

In the clip, he was seen calmly telling the crowd: “Stay where you are. Don’t fucking push in on me. I’ll come to you.

“Give everybody space, and as soon as somebody’s a dick, I’m going. Clear?”

Advertisement

He then proceeded to sign autographs for those outside his hotel, but drew the line at signing one as “Maximus”, his character from the hit film Gladiator.

In a post about the incident on X, TMZ claimed: “If you needed a reminder that fans are not always priority number one – turn to Russell Crowe – cause the guy was absolutely not having it outside of his Paris hotel.”

If you needed a reminder that fans are not always priority No. 1 — turn to Russell Crowe — cause the guy was absolutely not having it outside of his Paris hotel.

🎥 Backgrid pic.twitter.com/yCCErNOBQN

— TMZ (@TMZ) May 25, 2026

Advertisement

The Australian actor responded on Tuesday morning, branding the post “clickbait”.

“Everybody got their autograph and selfie, the passage to the hotel was kept free for guests, and I still got to the airport on time,” he insisted.

“One man, no security. Handled. What’s your problem?”

Clickbait. Everybody got their autograph and selfie, the passage to the hotel was kept free for guests, and I still got to the airport on time. One man, no security. Handled. What’s your problem ? https://t.co/Yxo2BIFSe9

— Russell Crowe (@russellcrowe) May 26, 2026

Advertisement

Over the years, Russell has been involved in several prolific spats and altercations that have contributed to his reputation for having a temper.

Perhaps most notably, in 2005, the Les Misérables actor was charged with and pleaded guilty to second-degree assault after an incident at a hotel in New York, in which he threw a phone at a concierge.

After reaching a settlement with the concierge in question, he described the incident aspossibly the most shameful situation that I’ve ever gotten myself in”, noting: “And I’ve done some pretty dumb things in my life.”

Russell currently has three films scheduled for release in 2026, with two more in post-production.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

11 Of The Best No-Cook Heatwave Dinner Ideas (Not Salad)

Published

on

11 Of The Best No-Cook Heatwave Dinner Ideas (Not Salad)

I have not forgotten the classic “slice of ham, pickled beetroot, coleslaw, and inexplicable spring onion” sunny day salads of my childhood, but I have forgiven them.

Sure, they seemed a bit chaotic at the time. But now I’m a full-grown adult in a blistering heatwave, cooking is the last thing on my mind, and I’ve been slapping together “girl dinner” concoctions of my own.

Nonetheless, I’m getting bored with endless butterhead lettuce and variously processed eggs. With the hot weather expected to last until at least the end of the working week, I preused Reddit’s r/EatCheapAndHealthy and r/Cooking fora to find the no-cook meals site users make on repeat:

1) Vietnamese summer rolls

Advertisement

“Fill with shrimp, julienned vegetables, herbs, chicken… so many possibilities,” u/114631 wrote.

This rice paper recipe takes minutes and is delicious with a peanut dipping sauce.

2) Rice noodles, and/or cold noodle salads

“Some brands of rice noodles just need to be soaked in hot water or microwaved for two to three minutes,” u/whatdoidonow37 wrote. “I top the noodles with whatever I have in my fridge ― frozen spinach or corn, shredded rotisserie chicken, cucumbers, julienned carrots, tomatoes, etc.”

Advertisement

If you want something even cooler, this 20-minute cold noodle salad recipe is crunchy, low-lift bliss.

3) A never-soggy bean mix

“Take chickpeas, black beans, or lentils… toss them with fresh lemon juice, lots of olive oil, some finely chopped garlic, and whatever fresh herbs you can find. Salt and pepper. This mix keeps in the fridge for approximately five days,” c-soup wrote.

I swear by my “never-soggy” pomegranate, feta, chickpea, and cucumber combo in climes like these. It lasts me a work week, provided I remove the slimy middle bit of the cucumbers (a trick Gordon Ramsay swears by, too).

Advertisement

4) Cowboy caviar

Multiple Redditors, including u/Esausta, swear by the American meal.

This salsa-adjacent mixture of corn, black beans, avocado, tomato, and red onion is best enjoyed with tortilla chips, all agree.

BBC Good Food adds that it’s not so much a strict recipe as it is a philosophy: whatever you can bring yourself to throw together in this heat will be fine, provided you get the starchy-fruity-crisp combo in there.

Advertisement

5) A sandwich

Last night, I had a crisp sandwich and hummus (don’t knock it ’til you’ve tried it) for dinner. And it seems I’m not the only one who reaches for bread in times of heat-induced fatigue.

“Look into Vietnamese Banh Mi, the cold cut version. All you need to do is assemble the ingredients,” u/UltraZulwarn wrote (this recipe takes minutes).

Others recommended simpler tuna or tomato sandwiches.

Advertisement

6) Anything involving a rotisserie chicken

It’d be inhumane to ask you to fire up your oven in the current 30-plus-degree weather.

But Redditor after Redditor swears by pre-cooked rotisserie chickens when it’s hot out. Strip them, “roughly chop [the meat], and make yourself chicken salads and BBQ sandwiches,” u/Cultjake wrote.

Other site users recommended burrito bowls and wraps.

Advertisement

7) Cereal

Everyone from u/Inevitable-Spite937 to u/Dngnb8 and u/mythisme said cereal is their go-to heatwave staple.

And u/mythisme added that they mix “two to three types of cereals and granola for varying crunch” and whacks some fruit and seeds on top for a “hearty meal”.

8) Smacked cucumbers

Advertisement

“All summer, I eat… Szechuan smacked cucumbers, which are super refreshing,” u/ttrockwood wrote.

“I use peeled regular cucumbers and just scoop out the seeds. Then I add in lots of edamame.”

And Sad-Database3677 said they “Use a mandoline or dice [cucumbers], add a little soy sauce, a little fish sauce, a few shakes of sesame seeds, maybe a little black vinegar, and a few spoonfuls of… crunchy garlic… Sometimes I’ll eat it with cold soft tofu”.

9) Gazpacho

Advertisement

“Gazpacho and ajo blanco are great, even better made and let sit a few hours in the fridge,” u/ttrockwood said.

Reviewers love this simple cold soup recipe, which derives a lot of its fresh and cooling flavour from juicy tomatoes and crisp cucumbers. As the Redditor said, it tastes better with added time in the fridge.

10) Ceviche

u/Quarantined_foodie recommended the classic cold fish dish, which only has two steps on BBC Good Food’s recipe.

Advertisement

11) Pita pockets

Fill these with mashed chickpeas, u/BigSerene wrote, or do as u/SassafrasTeaTime does and eat them with the aforementioned rotisserie chicken.

Others, like u/autonomouswriter, suggested dipping them into hummus.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform’s Makerfield candidate was a Remainer

Published

on

Nigel Farage and Robert Kenyon, both of Reform, sat in the front seats of a van

Nigel Farage and Robert Kenyon, both of Reform, sat in the front seats of a van

Robert Kenyon, Reform’s candidate in the Makerfield by-election, is reported to have voted to remain in the European Union. This could be something of a problem too because Reform wouldn’t exist if not for the campaign to leave the EU.

Reform Remainiac

As Skwawkbox reported for the Canary, Kenyon has links to known fascists and they’re not being exposed for the first time.

Kenyon stood, coming second, in the seat in the 2024 general election.

At that campaign, Searchlight Magazine pointed out his social media links to the leader of the British fascist movement.

Advertisement

Kenyon also made obscene comments about TV host Carol Vorderman.

Advertisement

Of course, the fact that Kenyon voted to remain in the EU doesn’t mean he still feels that way. The problem is Reform treats a vote for remain as the gravest of political sins, and it depicts everyone who sided with the EU as being forever tainted by that decision.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Nigel Farage has long sought to rid British politics of the Remainiacs. Now, he’s trying to force one upon the people of Makerfield. The constituency is a Brexiteer fortress too, with 66% having voted in favour of leaving.

We don’t know how he did it, but Farage managed to find one of the few people there who voted against him!

Freedom

Earlier this month, the Times’ Steven Swinford reported:

Reform UK will put Brexit at the heart of the Makerfield by-election campaign after interventions from Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting on rejoining the EU over the weekend

They will link it directly to free movement – accusing Burnham of wanting to ‘open the borders up to 500 million people’. This is a seat where two-thirds of voters backed Brexit at the EU referendum

Advertisement

This is awkward, it turns out, because Kenyon also praised freedom of movement.

We’re yet to see how Reform responds to this, but if Kenyon remains the candidate, it seems the party is now officially open to Remainers.

Featured image via X/ Nigel Farage

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Should I Water My Grass In A Heatwave?

Published

on

Should I Water My Grass In A Heatwave?

I know you know. You know I know you know. But it bears repeating anyway: phwoar, it’s hot at the minute, isn’t it?

Parts of the UK have just seen their hottest May day on record, with parts of London seeing highs of 34.8°C during the bank holiday weekend.

That, gardeners know, can wreak havoc on a previously flourishing backyard. Some plants, like hydrangeas, fuchsias, and even roses, can be especially susceptible to the glaring heat.

But expert after expert has warned not to water one of the most ubiquitous plants, even after they’ve turned brown: grass.

Advertisement

Why shouldn’t I water my grass in a heatwave?

It can be very worrying to see patches of your carefully-grown back garden turn brown and wilt in the heat. But luckily, the Royal Horticultural Society said, the plant is hardier than you might imagine.

During hot, dry weather, “lawns can turn brown and stop growing. Although this looks serious, the grass will green up once rain returns,” they explained.

And speaking to the BBC, Heather Taylor, also known as the “plant doctor”, also said we shouldn’t worry about the parched plant.

Advertisement

“If your grass is dry and parched, a bit of rain and it will be the first thing that will bounce back, don’t worry about it, it will be fine,” the expert said.

This isn’t to say yellowed or brown grass isn’t stressed – it is.

But, as Utah State University explained, “blades” of grass (the green part we see above ground) act as sacrificial lambs during tough periods, including drought.

These stop growing and become limp and discoloured in order to protect the “crown” of the plant, which lies just underneath the soil.

Advertisement

This is the node at which soil and root meet and is key to its survival: “As long as the crown remains alive, the grass has the capability to recover once temperature and moisture conditions improve”.

In fact, grass expert Richard Hull wrote for Turfgrass Trends, “The crown
literally is the turfgrass plant, or at least that which makes a turfgrass a perennial plant [a plant that grows back every year]”.

Often, he added, after periods of extreme drought or cold, it’s the only part of the plant that survives.

Unless that crown is damaged, your grass will likely be fine. And amidst increasingly common drought, some bodies like Scottish Water have called for gardeners to put the hosepipe down as water is “wasted” on grass.

Advertisement

What should I do with my grass during a heatwave?

Again, “Resist the temptation to water established lawns through the summer months, however brown they get, as the grass will send up new leaves once it rains,” the RHS warned.

New lawns may be the exception – use grey water or rainwater if they’re struggling.

They also advised against mowing your grass too short during hot weather, or doing so too often, because that can make the plant weaker and more susceptible to damage.

Advertisement

Stop mowing entirely if your grass has stopped growing. And if you can, keep your grass relatively long, “which should encourage deeper rooting”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Wings Over Scotland | No Money Back, No Guarantee

Published

on

Peter Murrell wasn’t even locked up in his cell at Saughton (we hope it’s the same one as Craig Murray’s) when the chump-suckering resumed.

And as the Nicola Sturgeon Loyal, led by her most faithful of lieutenants, set out to try to take control of the post-conviction narrative, let’s take a look at just what a boatload of bare-faced bullshit the above is.

Everyone in Scotland, not just the SNP’s members or independence supporters, was a victim of Peter Murrell’s crimes. For a start because Operation Branchform cost close to £3 million of public money, dwarfing the £400,000 Murrell pinched to spend on a houseful of frou-frou knick-knacks. (The police bill alone of over £2m does not include the Crown Office’s costs.)

But even the cash directly trousered by Murrell didn’t just belong to SNP members. The pot of party funds he pilfered it from was filled from three main revenue streams:

Advertisement

(1) SNP members’ membership fees and donations

(2) UK taxpayer funding, the large bulk of the SNP’s income

(3) Money donated by the wider independence movement to two fundraisers which ultimately triggered Murrell’s arrest, which were supposedly “ringfenced” for an “Independence Referendum Campaign Fund” but in fact just disappeared into the SNP’s general treasury and from there into Murrell’s pockets.

That last one, incidentally, remains an unanswered question. The two fundraisers combined raised almost £700,000 but Murrell only copped a plea for misappropriating £400,000 of it, and the rest remains unaccounted for.

Advertisement

We know it was spent years ago because as far back as October 2020 there was only £97,000 left in the party’s bank account, and the SNP has tried a whole string of absurd madcap excuses to explain away the fact that it was plainly, demonstrably and fraudulently frittered away on lavish and wasteful general party spending – the exact thing they angrily insisted WOULDN’T happen.

Operation Branchform started as an inquiry into the missing fundraiser cash but then morphed into a wider embezzlement one, leaving the original complaints unresolved. The former has a different and narrower group of victims to the latter, and they still deserve answers, not from Peter Murrell but from Nicola Sturgeon and her then-deputy John Swinney.

But it looks like they’re ontae plums.

Sturgeon’s girlboss fanclub have pulled out all the stops to excuse her.

Advertisement

But Sturgeon quite literally WAS responsible.

Not because she was Murrell’s wife and £80,000 of very pricey Amazon parcels were piling up, unnoticed by her, in the kitchen they ostensibly shared (although we’re told that their marriage was such a facade that neighbours referred to the house as “The Prop”), but because she was his boss – and as such had a direct fiduciary duty to party members to stop him doing what he did – and because she personally signed off the accounts from which hundreds of thousands of pounds were missing.

Sturgeon can’t even plead simple ignorance, because she didn’t just direct enquiries to the party’s auditors. She repeatedly, actively and personally asserted, in public and in private, that there was NO missing money and that the party’s finances were in rude health and anyone suggesting otherwise would be for the high jump.

?

Advertisement

?

Murrell’s activities might have gone unnoticed by the auditors (whose remit is very narrow and technical), but you didn’t need to be an accountant to see that the money simply wasn’t there, you only had to be able to read.

If Wings, a humble website run by an idiot, could spot it in 2020 – by the simple act of noticing that 97 is a smaller number than 700 – then the party’s leader, whose legal responsibility it was, certainly could and should have.

That is something that still needs explaining after Murrell’s conviction. Two people – Sturgeon and treasurer Colin Beattie – both signed off on accounts that were clearly and obviously dodgy to even an amateur eye, and it’s difficult to tell why neither has yet been charged with any crime.

Advertisement

The most plausible explanation – which came to us from a senior former SNP source yesterday – is that the Crown Office, having already suffered an embarrassing defeat over Alex Salmond, didn’t want to risk being seen to have mounted two expensive and unsuccessful prosecutions of SNP First Ministers in a row.

But even if we leave aside for a moment the questionable neutrality of an organisation headed by a person who is also a Scottish Government minister and answerable to the FM, the state of the Crown Office’s delicate ego is not an adequate reason to abandon valid complaints about serious crimes.

Yesterday morning Sturgeon – “The people’s QUEEN, living her best life” – affected a breezy air, posting holiday snaps on Instagram along with a personal statement about how sad and shocked and etc she was over Murrell’s crimes.

She ended the statement with the words “I will be making no further comment”. So anyone previously familiar with her track record on promises therefore wouldn’t have been surprised when it was followed just hours later with a further comment.

Advertisement

While the first had been in her own name, the second statement was lawyered up. It was issued by semi-celebrity lawyer, publicity aficionado and political activist Aamer Anwar, and backed up by a threatening email Anwar sent to much of Scotland’s media.

We say “threatening”, but on close inspection it’s got about as much legal menace as a TV Licence reminder. If the media fail to delete defamatory comments by readers or viewers, it says, Anwar is instructed to “consider” legal action or – oh no! – complaints to the toothless press watchdog IPSO.

Also, the threat carries with it a tantalising proposition – any legal action brought by Sturgeon for defamation would result in her having to appear in the witness box and be cross-examined in forensic detail by the defendant’s lawyer about what she did and didn’t know. You could make a fortune selling tickets to such an event, and Sturgeon’s usual “I don’t remember” approach to questioning, as seen during the Salmond and COVID inquiries, wouldn’t cut much ice.

Yesterday also revealed something we were told by an unimpeachable source two years ago, but couldn’t talk about while Sturgeon was still under investigation for fear of contempt charges – the fact that despite claiming to have “fully co-operated” with police when she was arrested, she in fact turned her chair to the wall and didn’t say a word for seven hours. She is of course legally entitled to remain silent, but it’s a very stretched definition of the word “co-operating”.

Advertisement

(Just as it had been when she publicly pledged to give the Salmond inquiry anything it asked for, and then, in conjunction with John Swinney, directly obstructed it and refused to hand over documents on almost 60 separate occasions.)

For the record, and for the reasons already stated above, it is absolutely this website’s belief that Nicola Sturgeon knew there was money missing from the SNP’s accounts, and that she was lying when she said otherwise, and furthermore that she dishonestly fronted a fundraising campaign while knowing that she had no intention whatsoever of “ringfencing” the resulting money. Mr Anwar knows where to find us.

Today, the SNP will attempt to deflect from the scandal with another performative vote in Holyrood about demanding a second indyref, secure in the certain knowledge that it’ll fail.  John Swinney will attempt to alchemise the Parliamentary arithmetic into the “100% guaranteed” referendum he said would result from an SNP majority, despite the fact that he didn’t achieve one.

He won’t have any more luck than Sturgeon did when she pulled the same stunt twice before (in 2017 and 2020) then quietly scuttled off when Westminster said no, and no more luck than donors to the SNP’s “ringfenced Independence Referendum Campaign Fund” will have at getting either their stolen money or their dreams back.

Advertisement

Although by this time next year, both he on his First Minister’s salary, and Sturgeon on her fat book advance and other lucrative income streams, will indeed be millionaires.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform’s Robert Kenyon: ‘Women get abortions for vanity’

Published

on

Robert Kenyon, Reform's candidate in the Makerfield by-election, sat at a kitchen counter

Robert Kenyon, Reform's candidate in the Makerfield by-election, sat at a kitchen counter

Reform’s Makerfield by-election candidate, Robert Kenyon, has claimed women get abortions for “vanity purposes” and boasted of being sexist.

Kenyon’s social media already linked him to far-right figures and extremist political views. Now, he’s been outed as anti-women too.

On a rugby discussion forum, Robert Kenyon said he was anti-abortion and mocked the idea of women’s and reproductive rights.

Reproductive rights? Women’s rights? They can dress it up all they want, they are deciding to kill a baby inside the womb…What they mean is they want to shag anyone they want and if they get caught they get a second chance and treat it [sic] as a secondary last chance form of contraception. They ain’t kidding anyone.

He went on:

Advertisement

I’d hazard a guess that the majority [of abortions] are for vanity purposes like unwanted pregnancies.

National pro-choice campaign, Abortion Rights, condemned his comments.

Chairperson, Kerry Abel, said:

Robert Kenyon’s comments are appalling and reveal a deeply harmful attitude towards women and abortion care. Suggesting that women lie about rape in order to access abortions is both dangerous and insulting to survivors of sexual violence.

Abortion is essential healthcare and the overwhelming majority of people in Britain support the right to choose. Candidates seeking public office should be challenged when they promote rhetoric that seeks to shame, stigmatise and undermine reproductive rights.

These comments also raise wider concerns about the kinds of extremism and intolerance being normalised in our political discourse. Everyone deserves access to safe, legal abortion without judgement, harassment or political point-scoring.

Advertisement

Featured image via X/ reformparty

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jacob Elordi Addresses Euphoria Season 3’s Shocking Nate Twist

Published

on

Nate met a grisly end in the latest episode of Euphoria

This article contains major spoilers for the most recent episode of Euphoria.

Euphoria actor Jacob Elordi has shared his take on how things played out in the latest episode of the hit US drama.

The Australian star has played Nate Jacobs in all three seasons of the award-winning series, with his character taking centre stage in the latest instalment in a big way.

We’re heading into serious territory now, so if you’ve not watched the episode yet, don’t say we didn’t warn you, alright?

Advertisement

In Monday’s episode, viewers saw Nate dying in pretty grim circumstances, first being buried alive due to his mounting debts before being stung by a rattlesnake and eventually found by his wife and ex, Cassie and Maddy, played by Sydney Sweeney and Alexa Demie.

While plenty of viewers were disturbed at watching Nate’s final scenes, Jacob himself had a very different response to finding himself “tucked in this box with dust falling on me and a snake coming down the pipe” to shoot the film’s practical effects.

Nate met a grisly end in the latest episode of Euphoria
Nate met a grisly end in the latest episode of Euphoria

“That’s a cool way to go,” he enthused in a behind-the-scenes video posted after the episode aired.

“Nate is someone who’s made so many mistakes and made so many dark choices, it’s cool to see it all come to what it’s come to.”

He continued: “I had to go into this coffin, my shoulders were touching the sides and I couldn’t move my arms. And then they would drill the lid on, and it would get dark.

Advertisement

“It was really nice, actually, it was quite peaceful in there.”

Creator Sam Levinson then explained that he couldn’t use a real poisonous rattlesnake in the coffin with Jacob, so a boa constrictor was used for the sequence instead.

“The snakes were rattling, which was really alarming when you’re locked in a box,” the Oscar nominee recalled. “They had a boa constrictor that they put a fake rattler on the end of [in the coffin]. And Sam was like, ‘we’re just going to drop the snake on you’.

“[The snake] was super cute. He was, like, real cuddly. He kind of just saddled up next to me, and it was nice. But he was real sleepy – sleepy snake. I had to kind of nudge him to get him to come up [to my face].”

Advertisement

“And that was it,” he added of his character’s fate. “It’s a bittersweet thing. This show is a massive part of not just my career, but my life. It’s been amazing and I’m so proud being a part of this.”

Jacob isn’t the only member of Euphoria’s A-list cast to be put through his paces while shooting season three, though.

Earlier this month, Zendaya opened up about shooting one memorable sequence that meant she had to spend “about three days buried up to her neck on the side of this hill”.

Advertisement

The Euphoria season finale – widely believed to be the last ever episode of the show – will premiere on Sky and Now in the UK on Monday 1 June.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sentences Of Teenage Rapists Who Dodged Jail Referred To Court Of Appeal, PM Says

Published

on

Keir Starmer speaking to Sky News
Keir Starmer speaking to Sky NewsKeir Starmer speaking to Sky News

Keir Starmer has announced that a particularly “distressing” rape case sentencing has been referred to the Court of Appeal.

Three boys were sentenced to youth rehabilitation orders and put on intensive supervision and surveillance after raping two girls in 2024 and 2025.

Footage of the attacks were later shared on social media.

The victims spoke out in a heartbreaking interview with the BBC’sLaura Kuenssberg and called on the government to intervene over the leniency of the sentences.

Chief secretary to the prime minister Darren Jones grew emotional watching the exchange at the weekend, telling the BBC: “No parent wants their daughter to be in those circumstances.”

Advertisement

Starmer confirmed on Tuesday morning that attorney general Lord Richard Hermer has now referred the case to the Court of Appeal.

The prime minister said: “It’s distressing for everybody to see, to hear about.

“The courage frankly of the girls to come forward is humbling. But it is distressing, I find it distressing as a politician, I find it distressing as a father.

“There are questions about the sentence. The Attorney General has power to refer a case to the Court of Appeal if the attorney general thinks the sentence was too lenient.”

Advertisement

He said it was “right” for the Court of Appeal to review the sentencing.

The Court can now change the sentence if it decides the judge in the case was too lenient, but it may also leave it, if it believes the sentence was reasonable.

The Attorney General Richard Hermer said: “There has understandably been a huge amount of public interest, and concern, at this horrific case.

“I directed my officials to work urgently, to allow me to consider this decision swiftly, and to begin to bring closure to the victims and their families.

Advertisement

“It is clear to me from their powerful personal statements, that these girls have displayed immense bravery in coming forward.

“There is an epidemic of violence against women and girls in this country, and this government will not hesitate in taking action to ensure all women and girls feel safe and have confidence in the justice system.” 

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025