Christophe Dubi, the IOC executive director for the Olympic Games, added: “We make a point to receive those petitions, and we have to recognise climate is a challenge for all of us.
“What we have to do as an organisation is to be at the forefront of sustainability, and our principles are very clear.”
One area the IOC is aiming to make the Olympics more sustainable is having Games take place over a wider area with more pre-existing facilities, and Coventry said Milan-Cortina is an acid test for whether this is a viable future.
Milan-Cortina takes place in three hubs spread across northern Italy – in Milan, Cortina and Livigno – with only two newly built sporting facilities: the Santagiulia ice hockey arena and Cortina Sliding Centre.
Advertisement
The next two Winter Olympics – French Alps 2030 and Utah 2034 – will also have sports spread more widely, while the 2032 Summer Olympics in Brisbane is will have venues across Queensland.
“We are really experiencing a spread out Games here for the first time – we are going to learn a lot,” Coventry said.
“We have taken this decision for sustainability reasons, climate and not having to have new venues. We are seeing there is an impact on National Olympic Committees because of the spreadness [sic], also for broadcast and media, making it harder to get around.
Advertisement
“What is really cool is that you get to see iconic venues in beautiful places – but now we have to weigh this up, the balance between a spread games for sustainability reasons but not shifting complexity and sustainability to different areas.”
While the action got underway on Wednesday with the start of the curling events, the 2026 Winter Olympics will officially start with the opening ceremony on Friday.
Coventry said she hoped all nations would be treated with respect by spectators, including the USA team amid criticism from Italian authorities about the presence of ICE agents in Milan.
“I hope the opening ceremony is seen by everyone as a chance to be respectful,” she said.
Advertisement
“For me, when we went to the Olympic village that is the best reminder of how the Games should be. I hope the opening ceremony will do that.”
Mandatory testing introduced last year to verify the sex of track and field athletes has been branded a “backwards step” and a “harmful anachronism” by a group of academics.
World Athletics implemented testing for the SRY gene last September, a measure designed to ensure that only biologically female athletes can compete in the female category at the elite level.
The governing body’s president, Sebastian Coe, stated at the time that the decision was taken to “protect and promote the integrity of women’s sport”.
However, 34 academics have now sharply criticised the testing in a report submitted to the British Journal of Sports Medicine and shared with the Press Association.
Advertisement
Sebastian Coe spoke out on the testing last year (Martin Rickett/PA) (PA Wire)
The group, which includes Professor Alun Williams from the Manchester Metropolitan University Institute for Performance Research, argues that the testing violates athletes’ human rights and risks creating significant stigma and psychological distress.
“These new regulations are an anachronism, and a harmful one,” the report authors wrote.
“They are a simplistic way of reducing a characteristic to a single gene, which does not reflect the complex nature of sex, and is couched in narratives of protecting the sanctity of fair competition in the women’s category that are not based in science and need to be challenged.”
The report further highlights an absence of robust data demonstrating that the presence of the SRY gene in individuals with a difference in sexual development (DSD) directly correlates with athletic performance advantages.
Advertisement
Professor Williams added separately: “There are already stigma and shame to people both inside and outside of sport arising from these regulations, and these consequences cannot be considered proportionate to the objective pursued by World Athletics.
“The longevity of the new regulations will probably be determined in court, but not before subjecting women and girl athletes to foreseeable and unjustifiable harm.”
The report also challenges World Athletics’ implication that genetic tests are straightforward, easy to administer, preserve dignity and privacy, and maintain confidentiality.
“These ostensibly reassuring words ignore the practical challenges, legal constraints, and huge ethical problems of implementing such tests across 214 member federations,” the report concluded.
Advertisement
In response, a spokesperson for World Athletics defended the policy, stating: “Biological men competing against biological women violates the human rights of thousands of female athletes who have the right to compete on a fair and level playing field. The expansive research on the performance advantage of biological men in sport is unequivocal.”
IOC president Kirsty Coventry is expected to explain how the female category at the Olympics can be best protected in the coming weeks (AP)
They added: “All athletes competing in the female category at the World Athletics Championships in Tokyo last year successfully took a once-in-a-lifetime low-invasive SRY test – an excellent example of global co-operation among our 214 member federations and World Athletics to ensure the protection of the female category.
“Our thanks go to them for having the passion and determination to make this happen.
Advertisement
“Clear and comprehensive communication, counselling if requested, complete confidentiality, and robust follow-up processes if test results are inconclusive are a critical and core part of World Athletics’ implementation of this test designed to protect and promote the integrity of women’s sport.”
The International Olympic Committee is expected to issue a consensus statement on how it believes the female category could be best protected in the first quarter of this year, according to its president Kirsty Coventry.
NEW DELHI: Speculation surfaced on social media after India’s win over West Indies that Sanju Samson could face disciplinary action — or even a ban — for his emotional on-field celebration in Kolkata. The rumours claimed that the Indian batter might miss the upcoming T20 World Cup 2026 semi-final against England on Thursday because he dropped his helmet to the ground after hitting the match-winning boundary.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!The moment came at the end of a tense chase when Samson sealed India’s victory with a boundary. As the ball raced away, the right-handed batter removed his helmet and dropped it onto the ground before falling to his knees and offering a prayer. The emotional celebration quickly went viral, with some observers suggesting the act might fall under the International Cricket Council’s Code of Conduct related to equipment abuse.
Why India vs England semi-final match will be a nightmare for bowlers | T20 World Cup 2026
Sanju Samson’s possible ban: What do the ICC rules say?
A closer look at the rules suggests that the fears of a suspension are largely misplaced. Under Article 2.2 of the ICC Code of Conduct, players can be penalised for “abuse of cricket equipment,” which includes actions such as throwing or striking items like helmets, bats, or stumps in frustration. The rule also covers deliberate damage to advertising boards, boundary fences, or dressing room fixtures.Even if Samson’s act were to be reviewed under this provision, it would most likely fall under a Level 1 offence — the lowest category of disciplinary breaches. Level 1 incidents typically attract fines or demerit points rather than suspensions.Former international umpire Anil Chaudhary also dismissed the speculation, explaining that Samson’s gesture appeared to be an emotional celebration rather than an act of anger or protest. According to him, such moments are common in high-pressure matches and are rarely treated as serious offences.Recent examples support this interpretation. Scotland’s George Munsey received only one demerit point earlier in the tournament after throwing his helmet in frustration following his dismissal.As things stand, there has been no official charge or complaint against Samson from match officials. India are scheduled to face England in the semi-final at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai on March 5, and the wicketkeeper-batter remains fully eligible to play.
India and England will face off in the semifinal of the T20 World Cup 2026 on Thursday, March 5. The Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai will play host to this contest.
India finished at the top of Group A in the initial round. In the Super 8s, they finished second in Group 1 and qualified for the semifinal. The Men in Blue made it to the top four for the sixth time in the history of the tournament.
On the other hand, England finished second in Group C to advance to the Super 8s. In the Super 8, they topped Group 2 and remained unbeaten. This is also England’s sixth semifinal appearance in the T20 World Cup.
Advertisement
While the Men in Blue are the defending champions, having won the previous edition in 2024, England won the tournament in the 2022 edition.
On that note, let us take a look at three players who could score the most runs in today’s clash between India and England.
#3 Jos Buttler
England opener and senior pro Jos Buttler has had a tournament to forget so far. Despite his experience, he has failed to get going at the top. In seven games, he has scored just 62 runs at an average of 8.85 and a strike rate of 106.89.
Advertisement
That said, England will back Buttler in a knockout game and expect him to come good under pressure. He is due for a big score and would like to deliver in the semifinal.
Buttler has played 27 T20Is against India and has scored 644 runs at an average of 32.30 and a strike rate of 143.75. Moreover, having played for the Mumbai Indians (MI) and a lot of IPL cricket, he will be aware of the conditions at the Wankhede Stadium as well. In 24 IPL games at the venue, he has scored 761 runs at an average of 34.59 and a strike rate of 141.19.
#2 Harry Brook
England captain Harry Brook has been in solid form for them in the tournament so far. He is their leading run-getter with 228 runs from seven games at an average of 32.57 and a strike rate of161.70 with a century and a half-century.
Brook has a decent record against India. In 10 T20Is, he has scored 171 runs at a strike rate of 140.16. In India, he has scored 179 runs from nine T20Is at a strike rate of 147.93 with two half-centuries.
Advertisement
At the Wankhede Stadium, Brook has played three T20Is, scoring 72 runs at a strike rate of 144.00 with a half-century. The England skipper will aim to lead from the front with the bat in a crucial game.
#1 Suryakumar Yadav
India skipper Suryakumar Yadav‘s form has been hot and cold in the tournament. He began on a brilliant note with an unbeaten 84 against the USA, but has not gotten a big score after that. However, he has been batting well, scoring 231 runs from seven games at an average of 38.50 and a strike rate of 135.88.
Against England, Suryakumar has scored 349 runs from 13 games at a strike rate of 171.92. In three T20Is at the Wankhede, he has scored 93 runs at an average of 43.50 and a strike rate of 150. Moreover, he has played 39 IPL games at the venue, piling on 1394 runs at an average of 43.56 and a strike rate of 165.36.
Playing domestic cricket for Mumbai and IPL for the Mumbai Indians (MI), he will be expected to do well with the bat in familiar conditions.
Arsenal toil to just about do enough, but it may mean an awful lot more.
Mikel Arteta’s minimalism led to what was almost the maximum outcome on the night at Brighton, as a 1-0 victory ensured they went seven points clear at the top with a game more played. The news that Manchester City had drawn 2-2 with Nottingham Forest was greeted by even greater celebration from the Arsenal travelling support than their own final whistle. Moments later, for the first time this season, they were singing “we’re gonna win the league”.
That might yet tempt fate but it’s hard to begrudge them given how big this felt for the season. There have nevertheless rarely been matches so potentially seismic that were so muted – at least until Fabian Hurzeler’s press conference started. “I will never be the type of manager who tries to win that way,” he said. It was still Arsenal that won, though.
The post-match theatre was consequently one of those where multiple things were party correct: Hurzeler had a point, but also missed the point, and yet Arsenal could also heed some of what he said, at least in terms of not wanting to live too many games like this. But then a win in these circumstances, to bring it full circle, may actually release Arsenal and prevent that.
It wasn’t a riproaring game.
Advertisement
Arsenal secured the lead from Bukayo Saka’s fortuitous opener… and that was pretty much that. Mikel Arteta’s side duly kept their first clean sheet in five, since the 7 February 3-0 win over Sunderland, which may also prove highly significant.
But that is important because it will go someway to ease all of this angst, still palpable throughout this match. City’s result instead means Arsenal are now also on the longest winning run in the Premier League, at three.
Not for the first time this season, mind, this one probably didn’t need to feel so tense.
When asked whether he remonstrated with Arteta about time-wasting, Hurzeler just said “there were so many”. He also repeatedly argued the Premier League need to look at the rules.
Arteta’s response was a simple and sarcastic: “What a surprise?”
When asked whether he cares what other managers say, the Basque simply said “depends”. On who? “Yeah. And the comments… and the purpose.”
Advertisement
Bukayo Saka gave Arsenal an early lead (Adam Davy/PA) (PA Wire)
Before debating the actual merits of such arguments and the mechanics of the game, the extra psychological layer of Wednesday’s results should be acknowledged.
This was probably the kind of night when it was expected that Arsenal might slip in an awkward away game as City won a forgiving home game, only for the reverse to happen. For Arteta, the damage of that 2-2 draw away to Wolves is undone. For now.
The night’s results should nevertheless remain a warning that this is highly unlikely to be a straight line to the end, in the way the 2018-19 season was, say. Arsenal have to be conscious of how the competitiveness of the Premier League brings a new and constant danger of dropping points, which is why they probably still have to be conscious of performance. While Hurzeler had that spiky comment on how he wouldn’t want to play that way – which Arteta refused to comment on – and there’s obviously been wider debate about whether you’d want to win to win the league that way, the Basque himself wouldn’t want to play every game like this.
It creates too much psychological toil, but that points to a wider pattern.
Advertisement
Mikel Arteta brushed off the frequent criticism of his side (Getty Images)
There have been times this season when Arsenal have anxiously toiled for a goal, which is why a fortuitous strike like Saka’s must feel like such a reprieve – and maybe like they were due. There are certainly those among Arteta’s staff who believe that the club have been unlucky in many games, where the scoreline has not reflected the xG.
So here was Saka suddenly cutting inside to try a surprise long shot – in the way some demand he should do more – that had an xG of 0.01. It duly took a deflection to wrong-foot Bart Verbruggen.
And yet, as has been the case in many recent games, Arsenal didn’t press on. Their next shot didn’t even come until the second half. Brighton were allowed to control play, if not quite force it. It was so familiar to so many recent Arsenal matches – but also familiar to so many recent Brighton matches. That Joao Pedro had a hat-trick performance for Chelsea against Aston Villa was so pointed, since he is one talent that the club have not managed to replace. Kaoru Mitoma was allowed to roam without doing much. Brighton are so well structured until the final third, which then gradually erodes some momentum. Hurzeler’s complaints sound a little more embittered when you consider Brighton only created 0.8xG themselves.
Advertisement
Maybe that’s why Arsenal let them have the ball, but recent patterns suggest there are other reasons. Arteta evidently doesn’t want this. He can often be seen urgently gesturing to his players to get up the pitch. While Arteta has rightly been criticised for a certain conservatism, his general ideology is fundamentally based on players taking the ball on in possession. That does involve some risk, or at least a willingness to constantly be proactive.
Defeat for Manchester City kept Arsenal a step ahead in the title race (Action Images via Reuters)
One of the things that visibly happens with Arsenal in such situations, however, is that too many players stop doing it. They don’t take the step up. It might be subtle, sometimes almost imperceptible, but the cumulative effect is that they become vulnerable. It seems obvious this is down to the psychology that comes with so badly desiring to win this first title in 22 years – which is where Hurzeler misses the point a bit. It’s now about how you prefer to win. It’s about winning.
That approach can still mean just one slip changes everything, which Arsenal now know all well – not least from this very fixture last season. Arsenal’s 2024-25 title challenger arguably first faltered when they went 1-0 up against Brighton early on only for a contentious penalty to bring a damaging 1-1 draw.
Advertisement
This has the potential to be similar. The feeling had been that Arsenal might get caught and, if they didn’t, too many needlessly contained performances like this would gradually erode their edge. This time, though, it didn’t happen. Arsenal beat Brighton.
And the manner in which last season’s situation was reversed may be symbolic, as well as significant. Crucially, it may also ease Arsenal and bolster reassurance to the point they may not suffer this type of game again soon.
The profile of attackers does help. Arsenal immediately looked more lively when Kai Havertz came on for Viktor Gyokeres. The German just offers more control.
Arsenal now have full control of the title race, for the first time in weeks. They did what they needed. They have just been given fair warning this isn’t a pattern to repeat.
People First Stadium will play host to Friday’s
Round 1 AFL game between Gold Coast SUNS and
Geelong Cats. The game kicks off at 8:05 pm with Gold Coast SUNS heading into the game as favourites with the bookmakers. Continue reading for our in-depth preview of the Gold Coast SUNS vs.
Geelong Cats
game and give you our free tips and bets.
Friday night at People First Stadium offers an early measuring stick for two clubs with genuine premiership ambitions. Gold Coast enters 2026 on the back of its most successful campaign to date and has doubled down on that momentum, recruiting Christian Petracca and Jamarra Ugle-Hagan while securing academy talents Zeke Uwland and Dylan Patterson inside the top five of the draft.
Geelong’s offseason was comparatively restrained after last year’s Grand Final defeat, missing out on Rowan Marshall and Charlie Curnow but bolstering its midfield with James Worpel.
The Cats had the upper hand when these sides last met, grinding out a 61-37 win in heavy conditions at GMHBA Stadium. Max Holmes was influential with 40 disposals and 10 clearances, while Tyson Stengle booted four goals. With Stengle sidelined, the Suns will sense an opportunity to turn the tables at home.
This is at least the ninth time Garrett has been cited for speeding in the Cleveland area since being drafted by the Browns back in 2017. It’s the second citation Garrett has received since he flipped his Porsche in 2023. Last summer, Garrett was cited for driving 100 mph in a 60 mph zone just hours after Cleveland’s preseason opener against the Carolina Panthers.
Garrett, 30, had been stopped for speeding at least seven other times since he was drafted by the Browns. He was once given multiple tickets within a 24-hour span after being clocked driving 120 mph and 105 mph. Garrett has also previously been charged with reckless operation of a motor vehicle.
In September 2022, Garrett was injured after his Porsche went airborne and rolled multiple times. Garrett and a passenger were treated at a local hospital following the accident.
“This will be definitely a wake-up call for me, just try to be smart overall with driving,” Garrett said after that incident. “Don’t take anything for granted. Be grateful that I’m still able to be here and just take my time.”
Advertisement
Garrett, who is just one year into his four-year, $160 million extension that he signed last offseason, recently won his second Defensive Player of the Year award after recording 23 sacks in 2025, an NFL record. He set the record after taking down Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow during the Browns’ Week 18 win over the Cincinnati.
Garrett’s 125.5 sacks since 2017 are the most in the NFL over that span. He’s currently tied with Hall of Famer Dwight Freeney for 28th on the NFL’s career sack list.
ENGIE Stadium will play host to Saturday’s
Round 1 AFL game between GWS Giants and
Hawthorn Hawks. The game kicks off at 4:15 pm with Hawthorn Hawks heading into the game as favourites with the bookmakers. Continue reading for our in-depth preview of the GWS Giants vs.
Hawthorn Hawks
game and give you our free tips and bets.
In a rematch of last season’s Elimination Final, GWS and Hawthorn launch their 2026 AFL campaigns at ENGIE Stadium on Saturday afternoon. The Giants enter the season under a cloud, with a lengthy injury list headlined by Tom Green’s ruptured ACL. Key contributors Josh Kelly, Sam Taylor and Brent Daniels are also sidelined, leaving Adam Kingsley’s side to test its depth early in the year.
Hawthorn arrives in far better shape, although star midfielder Will Day remains unavailable as he targets a mid-season return from a shoulder injury. The Hawks will, however, welcome Jai Newcombe after his preseason suspension was overturned. Newcombe starred the last time these sides met, collecting 32 disposals and 12 clearances in Hawthorn’s 107–88 finals victory, a performance that helped halt a late Giants surge. With momentum from that September clash, the Hawks will look to make another fast start.
Man Utd now have a 10-day break before they return to action and they will be licking their wounds after losing to Newcastle.
Defeat has become an unfamiliar sensation for Manchester United. Before Wednesday night on Tyneside, the last time they lost a Premier League game the Christmas presents were still unopened.
That was a 2-1 defeat to Aston Villa on December 21 and although the recovery began slowly under Ruben Amorim, it has accelerated since Michael Carrick took charge in January.
Advertisement
But it ground to a shuddering halt at St James’ Park. For the first time, Carrick felt what it was like to lose a game as United head coach, and what made it more painful was that the performance was so flat and they failed to take advantage of Newcastle being down to 10 men.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our United WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. You can also join our United Facebook page by clicking HERE and don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
In those circumstances, most managers would welcome another game quickly to put things right and get it out of the system. United don’t have that luxury.
They will be in at Carrington on Thursday but will have a few days off here and there as part of a 10-day break between games, before Aston Villa visit Old Trafford.
Advertisement
That game has taken on greater meaning as the battle for Champions League football becomes congested. United had the chance to give themselves breathing room this week, and although they remain third, there are only three points separating them from Liverpool in sixth.
With the stakes now raised, Carrick has issued a rallying cry, calling for his squad to learn the lessons of their painful defeat to Newcastle and come back stronger against Unai Emery’s side.
“We’ve got to make the best out of it, we’ve got to make it a help,” Carrick said of the break. “There’s no sense in not learning lessons and understanding why tonight was what it was and how it happened and developed. We’ve got to learn from that, so we look at it and we’ll learn from that.
“It’s an important game, it’s a big week for us, it’s one we look forward to. We’re in a position now that we’ve put ourselves in, the boys have put themselves in, that can be really exciting. So we’ve got to be really positive going into the next game and look forward to it, because there’s a lot to play for.”
Oleksandr Usyk became the first undisputed champion of the four-belt era back in 2024, and heavyweight rival Anthony Joshua has predicted how the Ukrainian would have fared against the most recent undisputed ruler before him, Lennox Lewis.
Back in 1999, WBC heavyweight champion Lewis collided with IBF and WBA titleholder Evander Holyfield in a memorable showdown at Madison Square Garden in New York.
Lewis should have made history that night in becoming the undisputed king, but a dubious decision on the scorecards meant Lewis was rewarded with only a draw.
Advertisement
Eight months later, Lewis and Holyfield ran it back and ‘The Lion’ came out on top with a unanimous decision win to take home all three belts – the crowning moment of his tremendous career.
It would take a quarter of a century for another undisputed heavyweight title contest to occur, largely due to the recognition of the WBO title and subsequent beginning of the four-belt era.
Another win in his rematch with Fury cemented Usyk as the standout heavyweight of this generation, and when asked whether the 39-year-old would have overcome Lewis, former world champion Joshua told Daily Mail Boxing that he would favour his former opponent.
Advertisement
“[Usyk vs. Lewis is a] 50/50. [I will edge towards] Oleksandr Usyk.”
Luke Donald said there are “always bumps in the road” on the way to the Ryder Cup. Rory McIlroy undoubtedly agrees. But the Northern Irishman believes the current issue facing Team Europe, as they turn their attention to 2027 with Donald back at the helm, is one with an easy solution.
It just takes one man to change his mind. At the moment, that solution seems unlikely to materialize.
On Tuesday, Jon Rahm refused to budge in his ongoing battle with the DP World Tour. The DP World Tour recently reached an agreement (independent of LIV Golf) with eight of its members to grant them conditional releases to compete in LIV events without accumulating further sanctions. Players, including Tyrrell Hatton, agreed to pay all outstanding fines, participate in additional stipulated DPWT tournaments and withdraw all pending appeals. Rahm declined the offer, saying the European Tour was “extorting” players by having them play in six events, two of which will be determined by the DP World Tour, instead of the four normally required to maintain membership.
“I don’t like what they’re doing currently with the contract they’re having us sign,” Rahm said. “I don’t like the conditions. They’re asking me to play a minimum of six events, and they dictate where two of those have to be, amongst other things that I don’t agree with.”
Rahm has challenged the DP World Tour’s conflicting events policy — which he says has resulted in over $3 million in fines — in arbitration court. He can remain a DP World Tour member until that case is heard. If he loses the case, he’ll need to pay his fines to remain a member, something he has said he won’t do, or he will be ineligible for the Ryder Cup.
On Wednesday, ahead of the Arnold Palmer Invitational, McIlroy said he believes the European Tour did everything possible to find a middle ground that would allow players to retain their membership while playing on LIV and benefiting the DP World Tour at the same time. A better deal is something McIlroy has trouble seeing coming down the pike.
“It’s a really generous deal,” McIlroy said. “Like it’s a much softer deal than what Brooks [Koepka] took to come back and play on the PGA Tour. Look, the European Tour can only do so much to accommodate these guys.
Advertisement
“There’s a reason eight of the nine guys took that deal, right? I think it’s a really good deal. Yeah, obviously Jon doesn’t think so, and he’s obviously well within his rights to think that way. But I just don’t see what more the European Tour can do to accommodate these guys to retain their membership.”
As Rahm explained his position on Tuesday in Hong Kong, he noted that the six-event requirement to drop the legal battle and settle all business wouldn’t work with his schedule. The two-time major winner said he’d be happy to play four events after the LIV schedule ends, but didn’t want the DP World Tour to dictate which two extra events he has to play. The irony in that complaint was not lost on McIlroy, given that Rahm already signed up to play on a league that gets to dictate the majority of his schedule. Those 14 LIV events are non-negotiable.
“[It] isn’t a heavy lift,” McIlroy said of the six-event ask from the Euro Tour. “Yes, okay, maybe the European Tour gets to have a say in where those two [additional] events are, but I mean, I’m sure Jon doesn’t want to go to [LIV] South Africa next week, but he’s going there. So, you know, like I don’t, again, like … He signed a contract for LIV, and he plays 14 events and the whole thing. Like I get all that. But the DP World Tour is well within its rights to protect itself as a members organization and as a business.”
As for Rahm’s murky Ryder Cup future, Donald said he hadn’t yet spoken to the Spaniard but planned to in the near future. DPWT CEO Guy Kinnings joined Donald for Wednesday’s press conference and was clear about where things stand with Rahm.
Advertisement
“I think it’s pretty straightforward,” Kinnings said. “You know, he either withdraws an appeal and settles fines or he goes through the appeal process, and that process is underway. And then we’ll obviously then have to go with whatever the decision is made in that appeal hearing.”
Rahm’s Ryder Cup status has been a constant topic since he bolted for LIV in 2023.
When the defection occurred, McIlroy was among the first to say that Team Europe needed Rahm and that there had to be a way to get him on the team in 2025. With Rahm’s court case still pending, he was able to maintain his DP World Tour membership and play at Bethpage despite not paying his outstanding fines.
In Dubai in January, McIlroy said Rahm and Hatton should pay their fines and prove they are willing to pay to play in the Ryder Cup, as was Europe’s rallying cry at Bethpage. After accepting the Euro Tour’s olive branch, Hatton is now a DP World Tour member in good standing as long as he meets the requirements. Rahm remains in limbo with 17 months until RC rosters are finalized. To McIlroy, the ramifications are what they are. The Ryder Cup exists above individuals and the current divide in professional golf.
Advertisement
“Look, the Ryder Cup is bigger than any one person,” McIlroy said. “It’s bigger than all of us. We come and go. Players are — we pass through the system. Like, it’s the platform that’s the big thing. I mean, I think we should all be grateful that we have a platform like the Ryder Cup that we can play on and that we can showcase our skills and be a part of something that’s obviously way bigger than ourselves. So at the end of the day, it’s about the team, and no one player is bigger than the team.
“I think at the end of the day we all see the opportunity for [Luke Donald] to go down as the greatest Ryder Cup captain ever, if we go on and win in Ireland,” McIlroy said later. “So I’m excited for him, I’m excited for the opportunity that he has, and obviously I just want to be a part of that team to help him try to make that history.”
;)
